2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
3 päivää sitten
20,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
2,13%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 2 | - | - | ||
| 5 | - | - | ||
| 4 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 21.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 7.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·2 päivää sittenThis is indeed a fantastic announcement, I believe the annual expectation was et. Ca. Minus 25% and now the expectations are in the upper part of minus??? Djurslands Bank maintains its expectations for the financial year 2026 of a pre-tax profit in the range of 240-280 mio. kr. It is, however, expected that the result will be in the upper part of the announced interval, according to the bank's financial report for the first quarter of 2026.- ·7.3.Lollands Bank closed the round of listed banks' submission of annual reports for 2025 on Tuesday. It has generally been an uneventful round, where the feeling is that one needs to get out the magnifying glass to find anything surprising. In a world that in many ways geopolitically suffers from unpredictability, a lack of drama is actually quite a fine scenario. Especially when it comes on top of some historically good years for the banks. The general increases in bank share prices in 2025 have put a damper on speculations about further current mergers for the time being – but we all know they are coming. And perhaps even when one least expects it? I paint with a very broad brush when I claim that a large part of the banks in recent years with tailwind have neglected to streamline their organizations. This is probably not how it is perceived by either employees or management or Finansforbundet. And I fully understand that. But data simply says something else. Banks have, quite simply, two sources of income: Net interest income and net fee income. While the former is determined by the interest rate level and does not require more employees with higher earnings, fee income is naturally the staff-dependent variable. More loan cases require more employees (this hypothesis, however, will probably soon be challenged by AI). The net fee income per employee-krone over the past 12 quarters is falling for most banks (with four exceptions) – and this in a scenario with falling interest rates. All else being equal, there should be more activity in fee-related matters in a low-interest rate environment. Banks will naturally justify this with increasing compliance requirements. I myself work in an industry where annual efficiencies are a given (and where compliance requirements have also been sharply increasing for many years). These efficiencies have been a natural part of everyday life long before the advent of AI. I don't know many other industries where, in these years, one would be content with a continued deterioration of “productivity”. Management naturally walks a thin line in relation to Finansforbundet, so there are limits to how explicit one can be in strategies and announcements. And here we come to the most interesting moment in the annual reports (and the upcoming quarterly reports): Who can deliver on efficiencies when a tailwind from AI inevitably begins to emerge. The banks that succeed will not only be best positioned in direct daily competition – they will also be best positioned for survival in the continued consolidation. Not surprisingly, size is a decisive factor in the development of new processes. Not only is there more money to invest, there is also more money to be gained from larger volumes. Personally, I look forward to seeing if the strengthening of Bankdata after the indirect incorporation of Vestjysk Bank and Arbejdernes Landsbank via AL Sydbank, can lead to better solutions and perhaps even savings. So I remain optimistic about the industry in general and the larger banks in particular. Therefore, I am not selling out due to the current market turmoil. My experience tells me that it can easily get worse before it gets better – but I have not yet seen anything that questions the long-term attractiveness of Danish banks. PS. If any of you lacked further explanation of which Danish banks had actually made progress in the ratio between net fee income per employee-krone over the past 12, these confirm that size matters (in this context): Danske Bank, Jyske Bank, Sydbank and Djurslands Bank! Note that my analyses do not include Nordea and Ringkjøbing Landbobank.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
3 päivää sitten
20,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
2,13%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 päivää sittenThis is indeed a fantastic announcement, I believe the annual expectation was et. Ca. Minus 25% and now the expectations are in the upper part of minus??? Djurslands Bank maintains its expectations for the financial year 2026 of a pre-tax profit in the range of 240-280 mio. kr. It is, however, expected that the result will be in the upper part of the announced interval, according to the bank's financial report for the first quarter of 2026.
- ·7.3.Lollands Bank closed the round of listed banks' submission of annual reports for 2025 on Tuesday. It has generally been an uneventful round, where the feeling is that one needs to get out the magnifying glass to find anything surprising. In a world that in many ways geopolitically suffers from unpredictability, a lack of drama is actually quite a fine scenario. Especially when it comes on top of some historically good years for the banks. The general increases in bank share prices in 2025 have put a damper on speculations about further current mergers for the time being – but we all know they are coming. And perhaps even when one least expects it? I paint with a very broad brush when I claim that a large part of the banks in recent years with tailwind have neglected to streamline their organizations. This is probably not how it is perceived by either employees or management or Finansforbundet. And I fully understand that. But data simply says something else. Banks have, quite simply, two sources of income: Net interest income and net fee income. While the former is determined by the interest rate level and does not require more employees with higher earnings, fee income is naturally the staff-dependent variable. More loan cases require more employees (this hypothesis, however, will probably soon be challenged by AI). The net fee income per employee-krone over the past 12 quarters is falling for most banks (with four exceptions) – and this in a scenario with falling interest rates. All else being equal, there should be more activity in fee-related matters in a low-interest rate environment. Banks will naturally justify this with increasing compliance requirements. I myself work in an industry where annual efficiencies are a given (and where compliance requirements have also been sharply increasing for many years). These efficiencies have been a natural part of everyday life long before the advent of AI. I don't know many other industries where, in these years, one would be content with a continued deterioration of “productivity”. Management naturally walks a thin line in relation to Finansforbundet, so there are limits to how explicit one can be in strategies and announcements. And here we come to the most interesting moment in the annual reports (and the upcoming quarterly reports): Who can deliver on efficiencies when a tailwind from AI inevitably begins to emerge. The banks that succeed will not only be best positioned in direct daily competition – they will also be best positioned for survival in the continued consolidation. Not surprisingly, size is a decisive factor in the development of new processes. Not only is there more money to invest, there is also more money to be gained from larger volumes. Personally, I look forward to seeing if the strengthening of Bankdata after the indirect incorporation of Vestjysk Bank and Arbejdernes Landsbank via AL Sydbank, can lead to better solutions and perhaps even savings. So I remain optimistic about the industry in general and the larger banks in particular. Therefore, I am not selling out due to the current market turmoil. My experience tells me that it can easily get worse before it gets better – but I have not yet seen anything that questions the long-term attractiveness of Danish banks. PS. If any of you lacked further explanation of which Danish banks had actually made progress in the ratio between net fee income per employee-krone over the past 12, these confirm that size matters (in this context): Danske Bank, Jyske Bank, Sydbank and Djurslands Bank! Note that my analyses do not include Nordea and Ringkjøbing Landbobank.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 2 | - | - | ||
| 5 | - | - | ||
| 4 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 21.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 7.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
3 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 21.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 7.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 |
20,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
2,13%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 päivää sittenThis is indeed a fantastic announcement, I believe the annual expectation was et. Ca. Minus 25% and now the expectations are in the upper part of minus??? Djurslands Bank maintains its expectations for the financial year 2026 of a pre-tax profit in the range of 240-280 mio. kr. It is, however, expected that the result will be in the upper part of the announced interval, according to the bank's financial report for the first quarter of 2026.
- ·7.3.Lollands Bank closed the round of listed banks' submission of annual reports for 2025 on Tuesday. It has generally been an uneventful round, where the feeling is that one needs to get out the magnifying glass to find anything surprising. In a world that in many ways geopolitically suffers from unpredictability, a lack of drama is actually quite a fine scenario. Especially when it comes on top of some historically good years for the banks. The general increases in bank share prices in 2025 have put a damper on speculations about further current mergers for the time being – but we all know they are coming. And perhaps even when one least expects it? I paint with a very broad brush when I claim that a large part of the banks in recent years with tailwind have neglected to streamline their organizations. This is probably not how it is perceived by either employees or management or Finansforbundet. And I fully understand that. But data simply says something else. Banks have, quite simply, two sources of income: Net interest income and net fee income. While the former is determined by the interest rate level and does not require more employees with higher earnings, fee income is naturally the staff-dependent variable. More loan cases require more employees (this hypothesis, however, will probably soon be challenged by AI). The net fee income per employee-krone over the past 12 quarters is falling for most banks (with four exceptions) – and this in a scenario with falling interest rates. All else being equal, there should be more activity in fee-related matters in a low-interest rate environment. Banks will naturally justify this with increasing compliance requirements. I myself work in an industry where annual efficiencies are a given (and where compliance requirements have also been sharply increasing for many years). These efficiencies have been a natural part of everyday life long before the advent of AI. I don't know many other industries where, in these years, one would be content with a continued deterioration of “productivity”. Management naturally walks a thin line in relation to Finansforbundet, so there are limits to how explicit one can be in strategies and announcements. And here we come to the most interesting moment in the annual reports (and the upcoming quarterly reports): Who can deliver on efficiencies when a tailwind from AI inevitably begins to emerge. The banks that succeed will not only be best positioned in direct daily competition – they will also be best positioned for survival in the continued consolidation. Not surprisingly, size is a decisive factor in the development of new processes. Not only is there more money to invest, there is also more money to be gained from larger volumes. Personally, I look forward to seeing if the strengthening of Bankdata after the indirect incorporation of Vestjysk Bank and Arbejdernes Landsbank via AL Sydbank, can lead to better solutions and perhaps even savings. So I remain optimistic about the industry in general and the larger banks in particular. Therefore, I am not selling out due to the current market turmoil. My experience tells me that it can easily get worse before it gets better – but I have not yet seen anything that questions the long-term attractiveness of Danish banks. PS. If any of you lacked further explanation of which Danish banks had actually made progress in the ratio between net fee income per employee-krone over the past 12, these confirm that size matters (in this context): Danske Bank, Jyske Bank, Sydbank and Djurslands Bank! Note that my analyses do not include Nordea and Ringkjøbing Landbobank.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | - | - | ||
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 2 | - | - | ||
| 5 | - | - | ||
| 4 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt