2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
59 päivää sitten
129,50 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
531,24%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·3 päivää sittenFor those following the Bruton thesis, updated information came today; Trøim's tanker shipping company splits – hires shipping top executive Tanker shipping company Bruton, where billionaire Tor Olav Trøim is the largest shareholder, announces several news items in a stock exchange announcement Tuesday evening. The biggest is that the shipping company will be split into two. The first four VLCC tankers, of which the first is now delivered, will be gathered in a separate company with the goal of monthly dividends to shareholders. At the same time, Bruton brings in a new CEO. Lars-Christian Svensen, who currently leads 2020 Bulkers, Himalaya Shipping and Andes Tankers, takes over temporarily. Who will succeed him, is not known. https://www.dn.no/investor/nyhetsstudio/177047
Have viewed this theory about a takeover of the listed shell as more amusing than practically relevant. But I agree that this week's stock exchange announcement about a demerger in Bruton, in isolation, makes it more relevant for Bruton's dividend company to have a quick transition to OB. But if there is a takeover, I don't believe much that it will be settled in Bruton shares. If I am to launch an alternative theory to @Buggie1971's theory, it is that Bruton's dividend company might make a bid in $ for 2020B's "platform" as an alternative to taking the small detour via expand for about a year before OB - as Himalaya did. This means avoiding settlement in Bruton shares. A settlement in Bruton shares becomes complicated for several reasons: -dilutes ownership in Bruton permanently for a small temporary advantage (a slightly faster listing on OB than if done like Himalaya did) -2020B can be owned in accounts where it is impossible to own Bruton -the valuation of the companies in today's stock market is very asynchronous. One company overpriced, while the other is underpriced -Bruton is in a demerger process that is challenging enough to ensure correct valuation for the two companies that are to separate and be listed individually. To mess up the 2020B listed shell (with unclear valuation) into this further complicates the picture. So if there is to be a takeover of 2020B's listed shell, I believe more in a settlement in $ rather than in Bruton shares. How much Bruton is willing to pay for this remains to be seen. The small advantage of a slightly faster OB listing must be weighed against the cost, and 2020B probably doesn't have many alternative buyers for its listed shell. We will know more within about a week 😀
·26.6.Can one assume that the price now corresponds to what it costs to get a company listed plus cash, meaning that we are at a 1:1 price? Downside risk should then be zero, I'm just wondering?
I consider the most likely scenario to be 50% down within the next months (read: new case with subsequent emission around net cash per share)
·23.6. · MuokattuHere is my contribution to the speculations about 2020 bulkers' future: In February this year, I formulated a hypothesis that Bruton would use the 2020 shell to get on the main list on Oslo Børs (RTO - reverse takeover). I have also expanded on the hypothesis in March and April in various posts. I have summarized the various events (and the lack thereof) and assessed each of the 6 possible fates of a shell company against the information that was available at different times on the following website, as it was a bit cumbersome to include everything in a Nordnet post. You can decide for yourselves whether my assessments are reasonable or not. https://rto-bayes-analyse-v2.netlify.app/ April 23 is the deadline for sending out information to shareholders prior to Bruton's AGM. If my hypothesis is correct, both Bruton and 2020 shareholders will receive information simultaneously, which includes information about the share exchange ratio etc., and voting on the merger of the companies, dilution etc. Now there are only a few weeks left until I either get it right or am thoroughly wrong. #not-investment-advice
I believe they have a plan going forward that does not concern 2020 Bulkers. They will follow their plan and take it easy and take one step at a time. They will take contracts for the vessels as it becomes relevant. I have bought a few Bruton on my capital endowment policy I have at Avanza and expect that we will need to inject more money going forward. Today I have the shares on watch so I don't miss anything.
·23.6.Hi everyone, a short summer greeting to all who have held the shares in 2020, now also 2026, which at least I would like to know more about. After we received the last dividend, it has been quiet, but it looks like the share is still alive and traded daily at prices significantly higher than the pecuniary values in the company, therefore we are waiting for news from the management, perhaps more bulk, which is a market they master.
·16.6.What do people think about this stock now? Do you think they can make a comeback and buy new ships?Poistettu·18.6.I like 2020 Bulkers as a dividend case, but from a speculator's perspective, it is precisely the rate picture and sentiment that make the stock interesting. I don't necessarily think the case is about them going out and buying a lot of new ships, but rather that a tighter dry bulk market can lead to higher rates, better dividends, and thus lift the stock. New ships can, of course, be positive, but then the timing and financing must be good. As someone else commented further up here, it's a fair point that any growth or new ships could quickly require more capital than the company currently possesses, and issuance risk is absolutely something one must account for. At the same time, it's not necessarily a given that the case for 2020 Bulkers is about aggressive expansion right now. One just has to wait and see, plain and simple :)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
59 päivää sitten
129,50 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
531,24%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenFor those following the Bruton thesis, updated information came today; Trøim's tanker shipping company splits – hires shipping top executive Tanker shipping company Bruton, where billionaire Tor Olav Trøim is the largest shareholder, announces several news items in a stock exchange announcement Tuesday evening. The biggest is that the shipping company will be split into two. The first four VLCC tankers, of which the first is now delivered, will be gathered in a separate company with the goal of monthly dividends to shareholders. At the same time, Bruton brings in a new CEO. Lars-Christian Svensen, who currently leads 2020 Bulkers, Himalaya Shipping and Andes Tankers, takes over temporarily. Who will succeed him, is not known. https://www.dn.no/investor/nyhetsstudio/177047Have viewed this theory about a takeover of the listed shell as more amusing than practically relevant. But I agree that this week's stock exchange announcement about a demerger in Bruton, in isolation, makes it more relevant for Bruton's dividend company to have a quick transition to OB. But if there is a takeover, I don't believe much that it will be settled in Bruton shares. If I am to launch an alternative theory to @Buggie1971's theory, it is that Bruton's dividend company might make a bid in $ for 2020B's "platform" as an alternative to taking the small detour via expand for about a year before OB - as Himalaya did. This means avoiding settlement in Bruton shares. A settlement in Bruton shares becomes complicated for several reasons: -dilutes ownership in Bruton permanently for a small temporary advantage (a slightly faster listing on OB than if done like Himalaya did) -2020B can be owned in accounts where it is impossible to own Bruton -the valuation of the companies in today's stock market is very asynchronous. One company overpriced, while the other is underpriced -Bruton is in a demerger process that is challenging enough to ensure correct valuation for the two companies that are to separate and be listed individually. To mess up the 2020B listed shell (with unclear valuation) into this further complicates the picture. So if there is to be a takeover of 2020B's listed shell, I believe more in a settlement in $ rather than in Bruton shares. How much Bruton is willing to pay for this remains to be seen. The small advantage of a slightly faster OB listing must be weighed against the cost, and 2020B probably doesn't have many alternative buyers for its listed shell. We will know more within about a week 😀
- ·26.6.Can one assume that the price now corresponds to what it costs to get a company listed plus cash, meaning that we are at a 1:1 price? Downside risk should then be zero, I'm just wondering?I consider the most likely scenario to be 50% down within the next months (read: new case with subsequent emission around net cash per share)
- ·23.6. · MuokattuHere is my contribution to the speculations about 2020 bulkers' future: In February this year, I formulated a hypothesis that Bruton would use the 2020 shell to get on the main list on Oslo Børs (RTO - reverse takeover). I have also expanded on the hypothesis in March and April in various posts. I have summarized the various events (and the lack thereof) and assessed each of the 6 possible fates of a shell company against the information that was available at different times on the following website, as it was a bit cumbersome to include everything in a Nordnet post. You can decide for yourselves whether my assessments are reasonable or not. https://rto-bayes-analyse-v2.netlify.app/ April 23 is the deadline for sending out information to shareholders prior to Bruton's AGM. If my hypothesis is correct, both Bruton and 2020 shareholders will receive information simultaneously, which includes information about the share exchange ratio etc., and voting on the merger of the companies, dilution etc. Now there are only a few weeks left until I either get it right or am thoroughly wrong. #not-investment-adviceI believe they have a plan going forward that does not concern 2020 Bulkers. They will follow their plan and take it easy and take one step at a time. They will take contracts for the vessels as it becomes relevant. I have bought a few Bruton on my capital endowment policy I have at Avanza and expect that we will need to inject more money going forward. Today I have the shares on watch so I don't miss anything.
- ·23.6.Hi everyone, a short summer greeting to all who have held the shares in 2020, now also 2026, which at least I would like to know more about. After we received the last dividend, it has been quiet, but it looks like the share is still alive and traded daily at prices significantly higher than the pecuniary values in the company, therefore we are waiting for news from the management, perhaps more bulk, which is a market they master.
- ·16.6.What do people think about this stock now? Do you think they can make a comeback and buy new ships?Poistettu·18.6.I like 2020 Bulkers as a dividend case, but from a speculator's perspective, it is precisely the rate picture and sentiment that make the stock interesting. I don't necessarily think the case is about them going out and buying a lot of new ships, but rather that a tighter dry bulk market can lead to higher rates, better dividends, and thus lift the stock. New ships can, of course, be positive, but then the timing and financing must be good. As someone else commented further up here, it's a fair point that any growth or new ships could quickly require more capital than the company currently possesses, and issuance risk is absolutely something one must account for. At the same time, it's not necessarily a given that the case for 2020 Bulkers is about aggressive expansion right now. One just has to wait and see, plain and simple :)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
59 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 |
129,50 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
531,24%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenFor those following the Bruton thesis, updated information came today; Trøim's tanker shipping company splits – hires shipping top executive Tanker shipping company Bruton, where billionaire Tor Olav Trøim is the largest shareholder, announces several news items in a stock exchange announcement Tuesday evening. The biggest is that the shipping company will be split into two. The first four VLCC tankers, of which the first is now delivered, will be gathered in a separate company with the goal of monthly dividends to shareholders. At the same time, Bruton brings in a new CEO. Lars-Christian Svensen, who currently leads 2020 Bulkers, Himalaya Shipping and Andes Tankers, takes over temporarily. Who will succeed him, is not known. https://www.dn.no/investor/nyhetsstudio/177047Have viewed this theory about a takeover of the listed shell as more amusing than practically relevant. But I agree that this week's stock exchange announcement about a demerger in Bruton, in isolation, makes it more relevant for Bruton's dividend company to have a quick transition to OB. But if there is a takeover, I don't believe much that it will be settled in Bruton shares. If I am to launch an alternative theory to @Buggie1971's theory, it is that Bruton's dividend company might make a bid in $ for 2020B's "platform" as an alternative to taking the small detour via expand for about a year before OB - as Himalaya did. This means avoiding settlement in Bruton shares. A settlement in Bruton shares becomes complicated for several reasons: -dilutes ownership in Bruton permanently for a small temporary advantage (a slightly faster listing on OB than if done like Himalaya did) -2020B can be owned in accounts where it is impossible to own Bruton -the valuation of the companies in today's stock market is very asynchronous. One company overpriced, while the other is underpriced -Bruton is in a demerger process that is challenging enough to ensure correct valuation for the two companies that are to separate and be listed individually. To mess up the 2020B listed shell (with unclear valuation) into this further complicates the picture. So if there is to be a takeover of 2020B's listed shell, I believe more in a settlement in $ rather than in Bruton shares. How much Bruton is willing to pay for this remains to be seen. The small advantage of a slightly faster OB listing must be weighed against the cost, and 2020B probably doesn't have many alternative buyers for its listed shell. We will know more within about a week 😀
- ·26.6.Can one assume that the price now corresponds to what it costs to get a company listed plus cash, meaning that we are at a 1:1 price? Downside risk should then be zero, I'm just wondering?I consider the most likely scenario to be 50% down within the next months (read: new case with subsequent emission around net cash per share)
- ·23.6. · MuokattuHere is my contribution to the speculations about 2020 bulkers' future: In February this year, I formulated a hypothesis that Bruton would use the 2020 shell to get on the main list on Oslo Børs (RTO - reverse takeover). I have also expanded on the hypothesis in March and April in various posts. I have summarized the various events (and the lack thereof) and assessed each of the 6 possible fates of a shell company against the information that was available at different times on the following website, as it was a bit cumbersome to include everything in a Nordnet post. You can decide for yourselves whether my assessments are reasonable or not. https://rto-bayes-analyse-v2.netlify.app/ April 23 is the deadline for sending out information to shareholders prior to Bruton's AGM. If my hypothesis is correct, both Bruton and 2020 shareholders will receive information simultaneously, which includes information about the share exchange ratio etc., and voting on the merger of the companies, dilution etc. Now there are only a few weeks left until I either get it right or am thoroughly wrong. #not-investment-adviceI believe they have a plan going forward that does not concern 2020 Bulkers. They will follow their plan and take it easy and take one step at a time. They will take contracts for the vessels as it becomes relevant. I have bought a few Bruton on my capital endowment policy I have at Avanza and expect that we will need to inject more money going forward. Today I have the shares on watch so I don't miss anything.
- ·23.6.Hi everyone, a short summer greeting to all who have held the shares in 2020, now also 2026, which at least I would like to know more about. After we received the last dividend, it has been quiet, but it looks like the share is still alive and traded daily at prices significantly higher than the pecuniary values in the company, therefore we are waiting for news from the management, perhaps more bulk, which is a market they master.
- ·16.6.What do people think about this stock now? Do you think they can make a comeback and buy new ships?Poistettu·18.6.I like 2020 Bulkers as a dividend case, but from a speculator's perspective, it is precisely the rate picture and sentiment that make the stock interesting. I don't necessarily think the case is about them going out and buying a lot of new ships, but rather that a tighter dry bulk market can lead to higher rates, better dividends, and thus lift the stock. New ships can, of course, be positive, but then the timing and financing must be good. As someone else commented further up here, it's a fair point that any growth or new ships could quickly require more capital than the company currently possesses, and issuance risk is absolutely something one must account for. At the same time, it's not necessarily a given that the case for 2020 Bulkers is about aggressive expansion right now. One just has to wait and see, plain and simple :)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt