2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
63 päivää sitten
‧8 min
0,10 USD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
12,68%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 200 | - | - | ||
| 82 | - | - | ||
| 318 | - | - | ||
| 56 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·2 päivää sittenIs there any point in entering here, now?
·2 päivää sitten · Muokattutzen, they have written in the annual report for 2025 that they have Going concern, and therefore have no plans to wind up. They could not have written that if they had liquidation plans within the next 12 months. Then they would have had to write in the annual report that the plan is to liquidate the company.·1 päivä sittenI have a hypothesis that Bruton will take over 2020 bulkers and use 2020 bulkers to get on the main list (see post further down for more on that hypothesis)
·11.4.Is it approximately the 10th of the month the dividend is decided?
·1 päivä sitten150 kr in dividend, then the price usually falls by the same amount, so subsequently would shares be worth approximately 0 kr? Or?
·1 päivä sittenWell, the value is then approximately 45 skr per share.- ·10.4. · MuokattuWe have previously had some speculations about what will happen with the 2020 Bulkers shell after the dividend from the vessel sales has been distributed. I have a hypothesis that I think is worth considering, and which I have not seen clearly formulated in previous posts (if someone has put forward the hypothesis earlier and I have overlooked it, then I apologize): 2020B has written in its directors report for Q4 2025 "The current intention is to return the net proceeds from the sale to shareholders following completion of the vessel sales, while retaining some cash on the balance sheet to enable the Company to capitalize on its platform and pursue potential strategic or other opportunities" They have also written a paragraph about going concern in their annual report for 2025, which one could not have written if the plan was liquidation. So 2020 Bulkers clearly intends to use the platform for something. If we read Bruton's reports and presentations, we find that they want a listing on a reputable international stock exchange closer to the time when the first vessels are delivered ("Bruton’s strategy is to explore a potential listing at a reputable international stock exchange closer to delivery of its vessels") Bruton lacks some points on the criteria for an independent listing on Oslo Børs, and could certainly save a year or more, if they can use the 2020 Bulkers shell for a reverse takeover, to get Bruton listed on Oslo Børs. There are several advantages with 2020 Bulkers as a shell for Bruton: * long stock exchange history on Oslo børs * good shareholder dispersion * common management * many shareholders who are already familiar with 2020 and HSHP, and who may therefore consider joining Bruton, if the offer is good enough. So, my hypothesis is that Bruton will send (or perhaps has already sent) an offer to 2020 Bulkers for a Reverse Takeover (RTO), which will then be voted on at the GF of both companies. Thereafter, The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway and Oslo Børs must approve the RTO. If I am right, we will probably get some information about this around April 20-25 so that shareholders will have been notified well in advance before the GF on May 12. What do you think about the hypothesis?
·1 päivä sittenThis does not appear to be a good scenario for Bruton's shareholders, so I don't have much faith in it. There were some 2020B shareholders who speculated on a merger with HIM even after 2020B started selling off some of its ships. What one «forgets» a bit in such analyses is to look at why the owners of the other company should accept dilution to merge with what is practically an empty shell from 2020B. I doubt that Trøim is interested in such a dilution for his part Bruton has already bought into 2020B management together with Himalaya. In practice, Bruton ig Himalaya will own 2020B management together. What the CEO of Bruton has actually stated directly in an interview with Finansavisen is that they are looking at reusing the strategy from Himalaya regarding an IPO on another exchange and specifically mentioned New York. HIM did this successfully some time ago. 
·8.4. · MuokattuUSA IS IN A PROXY WAR AGAINST CHINA, OIL AND SHIPPING ARE THE WEAPON AS OF NOW!! It is important to look up and see connections, and the headline is my go-to macro answer. For my own part, I am now taking out 50% in FRO, and 100% out of silver to secure profit. 2020 is now in practice a shell with high values, but will eventually be less affected by rates. OBX will most likely be more indicative for the price than the TACO-train riding shipping. The goal is to build capital for the next round where I envision the following. USA’s overarching goal is not oil for themselves, but to prevent China's access. Venezuela, Iran and Cuba have close to 70-90% of their oil exports to China and there is a 3-5 year window before China is self-sufficient. Analysts from Seeking Alpha estimate that the loss of cheap sanctioned oil could shave 0.4 % to 1 % off China's GDP growth due to increased production costs. USA is in reality in a proxy war against China, and this is supported by the countries they have attacked, the desire to allocate their defense to the Pacific, verbal attacks and taunts against NATO and the later messages where Trump increases the war chest by 350 billion dollars. The increase of «Yes, Oh great leader»-puppets in administration and advisory where correct worship is more important than truth, is a sure sign of collapse further ahead. At the same time, if one looks at previous «despots» they rarely fall quietly, so in my small world I think it's fine with moderate exposure and cash on account when the shit hits the fan. THIS IS MY THOUGHT!! YOU ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS AND ANALYSES IN BUYING AND SELLING.
·9.4.When will figures & dividend from March month come?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
63 päivää sitten
‧8 min
0,10 USD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
12,68%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 päivää sittenIs there any point in entering here, now?·2 päivää sitten · Muokattutzen, they have written in the annual report for 2025 that they have Going concern, and therefore have no plans to wind up. They could not have written that if they had liquidation plans within the next 12 months. Then they would have had to write in the annual report that the plan is to liquidate the company.·1 päivä sittenI have a hypothesis that Bruton will take over 2020 bulkers and use 2020 bulkers to get on the main list (see post further down for more on that hypothesis)
- ·11.4.Is it approximately the 10th of the month the dividend is decided?·1 päivä sitten150 kr in dividend, then the price usually falls by the same amount, so subsequently would shares be worth approximately 0 kr? Or?·1 päivä sittenWell, the value is then approximately 45 skr per share.
- ·10.4. · MuokattuWe have previously had some speculations about what will happen with the 2020 Bulkers shell after the dividend from the vessel sales has been distributed. I have a hypothesis that I think is worth considering, and which I have not seen clearly formulated in previous posts (if someone has put forward the hypothesis earlier and I have overlooked it, then I apologize): 2020B has written in its directors report for Q4 2025 "The current intention is to return the net proceeds from the sale to shareholders following completion of the vessel sales, while retaining some cash on the balance sheet to enable the Company to capitalize on its platform and pursue potential strategic or other opportunities" They have also written a paragraph about going concern in their annual report for 2025, which one could not have written if the plan was liquidation. So 2020 Bulkers clearly intends to use the platform for something. If we read Bruton's reports and presentations, we find that they want a listing on a reputable international stock exchange closer to the time when the first vessels are delivered ("Bruton’s strategy is to explore a potential listing at a reputable international stock exchange closer to delivery of its vessels") Bruton lacks some points on the criteria for an independent listing on Oslo Børs, and could certainly save a year or more, if they can use the 2020 Bulkers shell for a reverse takeover, to get Bruton listed on Oslo Børs. There are several advantages with 2020 Bulkers as a shell for Bruton: * long stock exchange history on Oslo børs * good shareholder dispersion * common management * many shareholders who are already familiar with 2020 and HSHP, and who may therefore consider joining Bruton, if the offer is good enough. So, my hypothesis is that Bruton will send (or perhaps has already sent) an offer to 2020 Bulkers for a Reverse Takeover (RTO), which will then be voted on at the GF of both companies. Thereafter, The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway and Oslo Børs must approve the RTO. If I am right, we will probably get some information about this around April 20-25 so that shareholders will have been notified well in advance before the GF on May 12. What do you think about the hypothesis?·1 päivä sittenThis does not appear to be a good scenario for Bruton's shareholders, so I don't have much faith in it. There were some 2020B shareholders who speculated on a merger with HIM even after 2020B started selling off some of its ships. What one «forgets» a bit in such analyses is to look at why the owners of the other company should accept dilution to merge with what is practically an empty shell from 2020B. I doubt that Trøim is interested in such a dilution for his part Bruton has already bought into 2020B management together with Himalaya. In practice, Bruton ig Himalaya will own 2020B management together. What the CEO of Bruton has actually stated directly in an interview with Finansavisen is that they are looking at reusing the strategy from Himalaya regarding an IPO on another exchange and specifically mentioned New York. HIM did this successfully some time ago.
- ·8.4. · MuokattuUSA IS IN A PROXY WAR AGAINST CHINA, OIL AND SHIPPING ARE THE WEAPON AS OF NOW!! It is important to look up and see connections, and the headline is my go-to macro answer. For my own part, I am now taking out 50% in FRO, and 100% out of silver to secure profit. 2020 is now in practice a shell with high values, but will eventually be less affected by rates. OBX will most likely be more indicative for the price than the TACO-train riding shipping. The goal is to build capital for the next round where I envision the following. USA’s overarching goal is not oil for themselves, but to prevent China's access. Venezuela, Iran and Cuba have close to 70-90% of their oil exports to China and there is a 3-5 year window before China is self-sufficient. Analysts from Seeking Alpha estimate that the loss of cheap sanctioned oil could shave 0.4 % to 1 % off China's GDP growth due to increased production costs. USA is in reality in a proxy war against China, and this is supported by the countries they have attacked, the desire to allocate their defense to the Pacific, verbal attacks and taunts against NATO and the later messages where Trump increases the war chest by 350 billion dollars. The increase of «Yes, Oh great leader»-puppets in administration and advisory where correct worship is more important than truth, is a sure sign of collapse further ahead. At the same time, if one looks at previous «despots» they rarely fall quietly, so in my small world I think it's fine with moderate exposure and cash on account when the shit hits the fan. THIS IS MY THOUGHT!! YOU ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS AND ANALYSES IN BUYING AND SELLING.·9.4.When will figures & dividend from March month come?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 200 | - | - | ||
| 82 | - | - | ||
| 318 | - | - | ||
| 56 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
63 päivää sitten
‧8 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 12.2.2025 |
0,10 USD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
12,68%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 päivää sittenIs there any point in entering here, now?·2 päivää sitten · Muokattutzen, they have written in the annual report for 2025 that they have Going concern, and therefore have no plans to wind up. They could not have written that if they had liquidation plans within the next 12 months. Then they would have had to write in the annual report that the plan is to liquidate the company.·1 päivä sittenI have a hypothesis that Bruton will take over 2020 bulkers and use 2020 bulkers to get on the main list (see post further down for more on that hypothesis)
- ·11.4.Is it approximately the 10th of the month the dividend is decided?·1 päivä sitten150 kr in dividend, then the price usually falls by the same amount, so subsequently would shares be worth approximately 0 kr? Or?·1 päivä sittenWell, the value is then approximately 45 skr per share.
- ·10.4. · MuokattuWe have previously had some speculations about what will happen with the 2020 Bulkers shell after the dividend from the vessel sales has been distributed. I have a hypothesis that I think is worth considering, and which I have not seen clearly formulated in previous posts (if someone has put forward the hypothesis earlier and I have overlooked it, then I apologize): 2020B has written in its directors report for Q4 2025 "The current intention is to return the net proceeds from the sale to shareholders following completion of the vessel sales, while retaining some cash on the balance sheet to enable the Company to capitalize on its platform and pursue potential strategic or other opportunities" They have also written a paragraph about going concern in their annual report for 2025, which one could not have written if the plan was liquidation. So 2020 Bulkers clearly intends to use the platform for something. If we read Bruton's reports and presentations, we find that they want a listing on a reputable international stock exchange closer to the time when the first vessels are delivered ("Bruton’s strategy is to explore a potential listing at a reputable international stock exchange closer to delivery of its vessels") Bruton lacks some points on the criteria for an independent listing on Oslo Børs, and could certainly save a year or more, if they can use the 2020 Bulkers shell for a reverse takeover, to get Bruton listed on Oslo Børs. There are several advantages with 2020 Bulkers as a shell for Bruton: * long stock exchange history on Oslo børs * good shareholder dispersion * common management * many shareholders who are already familiar with 2020 and HSHP, and who may therefore consider joining Bruton, if the offer is good enough. So, my hypothesis is that Bruton will send (or perhaps has already sent) an offer to 2020 Bulkers for a Reverse Takeover (RTO), which will then be voted on at the GF of both companies. Thereafter, The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway and Oslo Børs must approve the RTO. If I am right, we will probably get some information about this around April 20-25 so that shareholders will have been notified well in advance before the GF on May 12. What do you think about the hypothesis?·1 päivä sittenThis does not appear to be a good scenario for Bruton's shareholders, so I don't have much faith in it. There were some 2020B shareholders who speculated on a merger with HIM even after 2020B started selling off some of its ships. What one «forgets» a bit in such analyses is to look at why the owners of the other company should accept dilution to merge with what is practically an empty shell from 2020B. I doubt that Trøim is interested in such a dilution for his part Bruton has already bought into 2020B management together with Himalaya. In practice, Bruton ig Himalaya will own 2020B management together. What the CEO of Bruton has actually stated directly in an interview with Finansavisen is that they are looking at reusing the strategy from Himalaya regarding an IPO on another exchange and specifically mentioned New York. HIM did this successfully some time ago.
- ·8.4. · MuokattuUSA IS IN A PROXY WAR AGAINST CHINA, OIL AND SHIPPING ARE THE WEAPON AS OF NOW!! It is important to look up and see connections, and the headline is my go-to macro answer. For my own part, I am now taking out 50% in FRO, and 100% out of silver to secure profit. 2020 is now in practice a shell with high values, but will eventually be less affected by rates. OBX will most likely be more indicative for the price than the TACO-train riding shipping. The goal is to build capital for the next round where I envision the following. USA’s overarching goal is not oil for themselves, but to prevent China's access. Venezuela, Iran and Cuba have close to 70-90% of their oil exports to China and there is a 3-5 year window before China is self-sufficient. Analysts from Seeking Alpha estimate that the loss of cheap sanctioned oil could shave 0.4 % to 1 % off China's GDP growth due to increased production costs. USA is in reality in a proxy war against China, and this is supported by the countries they have attacked, the desire to allocate their defense to the Pacific, verbal attacks and taunts against NATO and the later messages where Trump increases the war chest by 350 billion dollars. The increase of «Yes, Oh great leader»-puppets in administration and advisory where correct worship is more important than truth, is a sure sign of collapse further ahead. At the same time, if one looks at previous «despots» they rarely fall quietly, so in my small world I think it's fine with moderate exposure and cash on account when the shit hits the fan. THIS IS MY THOUGHT!! YOU ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS AND ANALYSES IN BUYING AND SELLING.·9.4.When will figures & dividend from March month come?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 200 | - | - | ||
| 82 | - | - | ||
| 318 | - | - | ||
| 56 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt