2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
88 päivää sitten
11,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
2,63%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 1.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·17 t sittenONLY A FOOL IGNORES A SHARE BUYBACK PROGRAM Before the earnings season for the Danish listed banks truly begins – and before the summer holiday completely runs out – I have spent some time looking more closely at what influence the initiated share buyback programs have had on share prices relative to the general price development for the banks. And before anyone comes after me with accusations of scientific dishonesty, I will lay bare the very simple premises: I have looked at seven banks with buyback programs: AL Sydbank Danske Bank Djurslands Bank Jyske Bank Ringkjøbing Landbobank SJF Bank Skjern Bank I have looked at the share price development for the period 01-03-2026 – 31-07-2026. And yes, I know that SJF Bank and Ringkjøbing Landbobank initiated their programs later – and Djurslands Bank's program dates back to autumn 2025. So it's a short period – and if I had more time, I would have extended my small study to also examine previous years. "The Finance Index" has risen by 8.5% in the period from March 1st until today – and the OMX index has risen by 6.4%. The seven mentioned banks have on average risen by 15.1% over the five months of the period. I.e., a significant outperformance – also when compared to peers. If one instead only looks at the current periods of the share buyback programs and annualizes the returns, the seven banks show an annual return of between 24% and 146% – with an average of 61%. This has been during a period where banks generally have performed well, so this should also be remembered before overanalyzing the simple conclusions. Nevertheless, the results support the assumptions I myself have had. It also appears – not surprisingly – that the effects of the share buybacks are greatest among banks where share turnover is lowest – even when adjusted for the share buyback program's relative size to equity. In the name of simplification, this leaves stakeholders with some considerations: If you are an investor: Then in my analyses, I would consider attributing very high value to share buyback programs If you are part of bank management: I have previously argued that the best defense against takeover attempts is a high share price. If you have been in doubt, I have given you the recipe for a better defense above. Now I just look forward to the upcoming earnings reports.
·24.7.The number of owners has increased by 40% of Nordnet's customers in one year. One must also expect that very many of the shares are lying in dusty depots, mine have at least been lying there for +9 years. The company itself buys 16-25% of the shares daily - there can soon not be more shares to buy 😀
With a forward P/E of 11 it is certainly not expensive, But it is also not ridiculously cheap..
·14.7.ATH - and room for much more... If we set profit to top estimate 825 mio and buyback 125 mio at average price 425 and share price at 425, the P/E will be 8.2... If we set buyback to price 450 and share price to 450, the P/E will be 8.7... These are. numbers that speak for themselves...buy aggressively or be bought out...which banks hold shares in SJF?
- ·10.7.2026 has so far been a quiet year compared to the consolidation that has been a natural part of the Danish banking market since the financial crisis 18 years ago. The number of banks – listed and unlisted – has steadily decreased. And there is a consensus that the trend will continue – even among the directors. It's just that no one sees themselves as the leader of the bank being acquired. Obviously, the likelihood of further consolidations is greatest in times of crisis, as a merger can become an urgent necessity. Despite geopolitical unrest, Danish banks are in calm waters, although I personally can be nervous about the smallest banks' inability to create better results in the current economic environment where no significant losses are realized. I would therefore be surprised (read: disappointed) if no considerations are being made in the executive and board rooms about what should happen if a larger bank comes calling. We know that some of the small banks have historically defended their independence through voting restrictions, i.e., a defensive tactic where the indirect intention is to make the bank as unattractive as possible to suitors. The disadvantage of this tactic was highlighted in connection with the saga of Nordfyns Bank, where it was established that the voting restrictions were not applicable in termination situations. We know the voting restrictions from, for example, Lollands Bank and Møns Bank. And it has worked – so far. However, it is my assessment that a more positive and offensive approach would be more obvious in keeping suitors at bay: Why not instead focus on increasing the price of an acquisition so much that no one would genuinely make advances? It is well-known – especially in non-crisis times – that a premium must be paid to convince current shareholders of a merger. If I were the CEO of one of the smaller banks, where my most distinguished task was to ensure the continued independence of the bank, I would think that the current share price should go so high that the premium (additional price) would become too high for acquiring banks to pay. I.e., a diametrically opposite direction than voting restrictions, which, all else being equal, lead to a lower share price. So, in addition to the very obvious task of ensuring the bank is run soundly financially, I would make sure to look in the toolbox for shareholder-friendly initiatives. There are actually a couple that are so obvious it almost screams to high heaven. So obvious, in fact, that even banks not "at risk" of acquisition should use them if they care about their shareholders' interests. First, the least effective: It is obvious to ensure the highest possible liquidity in the stock, so both small and large shareholders can get in and out. I myself am a shareholder in Berkshire Hathaway (primarily just to honor a great idol) and yes, there can certainly be a snob effect in a high share price. But I don't think that's a factor for a shareholder in Kreditbanken. So why not arrange a stock split when the price at the time of writing is 8.800 kr.? In my view, Kreditbanken is in every way a very, very soundly managed bank – but why not pick the low-hanging fruit on behalf of the shareholders? I hold shares in the bank worth approx. 2,5 mio. kr. But just as long as it took to get in, it will take just as long to get out if one doesn't want to shake the price. This leads me to the tool that more and more have chosen to use in recent years: Share buybacks. I admit the counter-intuitive nature that a reduction in the number of shares would make it harder for a competing bank with good or bad intentions to take over power, but the decisive factor for the acquiring bank is not the number of shares or the price – it is the product of these, i.e., the total value of the bank. So if buybacks lead to a higher total value of the bank via a higher share price, it will not only be shareholder-friendly but also leave the acquiring bank less room to offer a reasonable "premium". A large part of my investments are in banks that currently use share buybacks. I can see in my data how significant an impact it has on the share price. Therefore, the initiation of a large share buyback program is the very best buy signal. Therefore: @ Kreditbanken: You will be able to deliver a stock split and a buyback program when the annual report for 2026 is submitted (you are actually the only one on Bankdata not currently doing so) @ Jyske Bank: A stock split is also approaching for you. I think, however, that you, better than most, have understood the value of share buybacks – thank you for that. @ SJF Bank: Good to see you getting started with the share buyback. The question is, isn't there room for a larger program next year? @ Møns Bank and Lollands Bank: Voting restrictions alone will not be enough the day the economic cycle turns @ My fellow investors: Enjoy the summerI also think there are still some cost percentages around that could be trimmed a bit - that would mean a lot.
- ·6.7.Price 400 - so there are only 100 price points up to a reasonably fair value...
They need to get the share price up to maintain independence. Otherwise, they will be acquired. So yes - 500 should be the minimum we need to reach for DKs best-run bank. RIBA though perhaps even a notch better?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
88 päivää sitten
11,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
2,63%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·17 t sittenONLY A FOOL IGNORES A SHARE BUYBACK PROGRAM Before the earnings season for the Danish listed banks truly begins – and before the summer holiday completely runs out – I have spent some time looking more closely at what influence the initiated share buyback programs have had on share prices relative to the general price development for the banks. And before anyone comes after me with accusations of scientific dishonesty, I will lay bare the very simple premises: I have looked at seven banks with buyback programs: AL Sydbank Danske Bank Djurslands Bank Jyske Bank Ringkjøbing Landbobank SJF Bank Skjern Bank I have looked at the share price development for the period 01-03-2026 – 31-07-2026. And yes, I know that SJF Bank and Ringkjøbing Landbobank initiated their programs later – and Djurslands Bank's program dates back to autumn 2025. So it's a short period – and if I had more time, I would have extended my small study to also examine previous years. "The Finance Index" has risen by 8.5% in the period from March 1st until today – and the OMX index has risen by 6.4%. The seven mentioned banks have on average risen by 15.1% over the five months of the period. I.e., a significant outperformance – also when compared to peers. If one instead only looks at the current periods of the share buyback programs and annualizes the returns, the seven banks show an annual return of between 24% and 146% – with an average of 61%. This has been during a period where banks generally have performed well, so this should also be remembered before overanalyzing the simple conclusions. Nevertheless, the results support the assumptions I myself have had. It also appears – not surprisingly – that the effects of the share buybacks are greatest among banks where share turnover is lowest – even when adjusted for the share buyback program's relative size to equity. In the name of simplification, this leaves stakeholders with some considerations: If you are an investor: Then in my analyses, I would consider attributing very high value to share buyback programs If you are part of bank management: I have previously argued that the best defense against takeover attempts is a high share price. If you have been in doubt, I have given you the recipe for a better defense above. Now I just look forward to the upcoming earnings reports.
- ·24.7.The number of owners has increased by 40% of Nordnet's customers in one year. One must also expect that very many of the shares are lying in dusty depots, mine have at least been lying there for +9 years. The company itself buys 16-25% of the shares daily - there can soon not be more shares to buy 😀With a forward P/E of 11 it is certainly not expensive, But it is also not ridiculously cheap..
- ·14.7.ATH - and room for much more... If we set profit to top estimate 825 mio and buyback 125 mio at average price 425 and share price at 425, the P/E will be 8.2... If we set buyback to price 450 and share price to 450, the P/E will be 8.7... These are. numbers that speak for themselves...buy aggressively or be bought out...which banks hold shares in SJF?
- ·10.7.2026 has so far been a quiet year compared to the consolidation that has been a natural part of the Danish banking market since the financial crisis 18 years ago. The number of banks – listed and unlisted – has steadily decreased. And there is a consensus that the trend will continue – even among the directors. It's just that no one sees themselves as the leader of the bank being acquired. Obviously, the likelihood of further consolidations is greatest in times of crisis, as a merger can become an urgent necessity. Despite geopolitical unrest, Danish banks are in calm waters, although I personally can be nervous about the smallest banks' inability to create better results in the current economic environment where no significant losses are realized. I would therefore be surprised (read: disappointed) if no considerations are being made in the executive and board rooms about what should happen if a larger bank comes calling. We know that some of the small banks have historically defended their independence through voting restrictions, i.e., a defensive tactic where the indirect intention is to make the bank as unattractive as possible to suitors. The disadvantage of this tactic was highlighted in connection with the saga of Nordfyns Bank, where it was established that the voting restrictions were not applicable in termination situations. We know the voting restrictions from, for example, Lollands Bank and Møns Bank. And it has worked – so far. However, it is my assessment that a more positive and offensive approach would be more obvious in keeping suitors at bay: Why not instead focus on increasing the price of an acquisition so much that no one would genuinely make advances? It is well-known – especially in non-crisis times – that a premium must be paid to convince current shareholders of a merger. If I were the CEO of one of the smaller banks, where my most distinguished task was to ensure the continued independence of the bank, I would think that the current share price should go so high that the premium (additional price) would become too high for acquiring banks to pay. I.e., a diametrically opposite direction than voting restrictions, which, all else being equal, lead to a lower share price. So, in addition to the very obvious task of ensuring the bank is run soundly financially, I would make sure to look in the toolbox for shareholder-friendly initiatives. There are actually a couple that are so obvious it almost screams to high heaven. So obvious, in fact, that even banks not "at risk" of acquisition should use them if they care about their shareholders' interests. First, the least effective: It is obvious to ensure the highest possible liquidity in the stock, so both small and large shareholders can get in and out. I myself am a shareholder in Berkshire Hathaway (primarily just to honor a great idol) and yes, there can certainly be a snob effect in a high share price. But I don't think that's a factor for a shareholder in Kreditbanken. So why not arrange a stock split when the price at the time of writing is 8.800 kr.? In my view, Kreditbanken is in every way a very, very soundly managed bank – but why not pick the low-hanging fruit on behalf of the shareholders? I hold shares in the bank worth approx. 2,5 mio. kr. But just as long as it took to get in, it will take just as long to get out if one doesn't want to shake the price. This leads me to the tool that more and more have chosen to use in recent years: Share buybacks. I admit the counter-intuitive nature that a reduction in the number of shares would make it harder for a competing bank with good or bad intentions to take over power, but the decisive factor for the acquiring bank is not the number of shares or the price – it is the product of these, i.e., the total value of the bank. So if buybacks lead to a higher total value of the bank via a higher share price, it will not only be shareholder-friendly but also leave the acquiring bank less room to offer a reasonable "premium". A large part of my investments are in banks that currently use share buybacks. I can see in my data how significant an impact it has on the share price. Therefore, the initiation of a large share buyback program is the very best buy signal. Therefore: @ Kreditbanken: You will be able to deliver a stock split and a buyback program when the annual report for 2026 is submitted (you are actually the only one on Bankdata not currently doing so) @ Jyske Bank: A stock split is also approaching for you. I think, however, that you, better than most, have understood the value of share buybacks – thank you for that. @ SJF Bank: Good to see you getting started with the share buyback. The question is, isn't there room for a larger program next year? @ Møns Bank and Lollands Bank: Voting restrictions alone will not be enough the day the economic cycle turns @ My fellow investors: Enjoy the summerI also think there are still some cost percentages around that could be trimmed a bit - that would mean a lot.
- ·6.7.Price 400 - so there are only 100 price points up to a reasonably fair value...They need to get the share price up to maintain independence. Otherwise, they will be acquired. So yes - 500 should be the minimum we need to reach for DKs best-run bank. RIBA though perhaps even a notch better?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 1.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
88 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 1.5.2025 |
11,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
2,63%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·17 t sittenONLY A FOOL IGNORES A SHARE BUYBACK PROGRAM Before the earnings season for the Danish listed banks truly begins – and before the summer holiday completely runs out – I have spent some time looking more closely at what influence the initiated share buyback programs have had on share prices relative to the general price development for the banks. And before anyone comes after me with accusations of scientific dishonesty, I will lay bare the very simple premises: I have looked at seven banks with buyback programs: AL Sydbank Danske Bank Djurslands Bank Jyske Bank Ringkjøbing Landbobank SJF Bank Skjern Bank I have looked at the share price development for the period 01-03-2026 – 31-07-2026. And yes, I know that SJF Bank and Ringkjøbing Landbobank initiated their programs later – and Djurslands Bank's program dates back to autumn 2025. So it's a short period – and if I had more time, I would have extended my small study to also examine previous years. "The Finance Index" has risen by 8.5% in the period from March 1st until today – and the OMX index has risen by 6.4%. The seven mentioned banks have on average risen by 15.1% over the five months of the period. I.e., a significant outperformance – also when compared to peers. If one instead only looks at the current periods of the share buyback programs and annualizes the returns, the seven banks show an annual return of between 24% and 146% – with an average of 61%. This has been during a period where banks generally have performed well, so this should also be remembered before overanalyzing the simple conclusions. Nevertheless, the results support the assumptions I myself have had. It also appears – not surprisingly – that the effects of the share buybacks are greatest among banks where share turnover is lowest – even when adjusted for the share buyback program's relative size to equity. In the name of simplification, this leaves stakeholders with some considerations: If you are an investor: Then in my analyses, I would consider attributing very high value to share buyback programs If you are part of bank management: I have previously argued that the best defense against takeover attempts is a high share price. If you have been in doubt, I have given you the recipe for a better defense above. Now I just look forward to the upcoming earnings reports.
- ·24.7.The number of owners has increased by 40% of Nordnet's customers in one year. One must also expect that very many of the shares are lying in dusty depots, mine have at least been lying there for +9 years. The company itself buys 16-25% of the shares daily - there can soon not be more shares to buy 😀With a forward P/E of 11 it is certainly not expensive, But it is also not ridiculously cheap..
- ·14.7.ATH - and room for much more... If we set profit to top estimate 825 mio and buyback 125 mio at average price 425 and share price at 425, the P/E will be 8.2... If we set buyback to price 450 and share price to 450, the P/E will be 8.7... These are. numbers that speak for themselves...buy aggressively or be bought out...which banks hold shares in SJF?
- ·10.7.2026 has so far been a quiet year compared to the consolidation that has been a natural part of the Danish banking market since the financial crisis 18 years ago. The number of banks – listed and unlisted – has steadily decreased. And there is a consensus that the trend will continue – even among the directors. It's just that no one sees themselves as the leader of the bank being acquired. Obviously, the likelihood of further consolidations is greatest in times of crisis, as a merger can become an urgent necessity. Despite geopolitical unrest, Danish banks are in calm waters, although I personally can be nervous about the smallest banks' inability to create better results in the current economic environment where no significant losses are realized. I would therefore be surprised (read: disappointed) if no considerations are being made in the executive and board rooms about what should happen if a larger bank comes calling. We know that some of the small banks have historically defended their independence through voting restrictions, i.e., a defensive tactic where the indirect intention is to make the bank as unattractive as possible to suitors. The disadvantage of this tactic was highlighted in connection with the saga of Nordfyns Bank, where it was established that the voting restrictions were not applicable in termination situations. We know the voting restrictions from, for example, Lollands Bank and Møns Bank. And it has worked – so far. However, it is my assessment that a more positive and offensive approach would be more obvious in keeping suitors at bay: Why not instead focus on increasing the price of an acquisition so much that no one would genuinely make advances? It is well-known – especially in non-crisis times – that a premium must be paid to convince current shareholders of a merger. If I were the CEO of one of the smaller banks, where my most distinguished task was to ensure the continued independence of the bank, I would think that the current share price should go so high that the premium (additional price) would become too high for acquiring banks to pay. I.e., a diametrically opposite direction than voting restrictions, which, all else being equal, lead to a lower share price. So, in addition to the very obvious task of ensuring the bank is run soundly financially, I would make sure to look in the toolbox for shareholder-friendly initiatives. There are actually a couple that are so obvious it almost screams to high heaven. So obvious, in fact, that even banks not "at risk" of acquisition should use them if they care about their shareholders' interests. First, the least effective: It is obvious to ensure the highest possible liquidity in the stock, so both small and large shareholders can get in and out. I myself am a shareholder in Berkshire Hathaway (primarily just to honor a great idol) and yes, there can certainly be a snob effect in a high share price. But I don't think that's a factor for a shareholder in Kreditbanken. So why not arrange a stock split when the price at the time of writing is 8.800 kr.? In my view, Kreditbanken is in every way a very, very soundly managed bank – but why not pick the low-hanging fruit on behalf of the shareholders? I hold shares in the bank worth approx. 2,5 mio. kr. But just as long as it took to get in, it will take just as long to get out if one doesn't want to shake the price. This leads me to the tool that more and more have chosen to use in recent years: Share buybacks. I admit the counter-intuitive nature that a reduction in the number of shares would make it harder for a competing bank with good or bad intentions to take over power, but the decisive factor for the acquiring bank is not the number of shares or the price – it is the product of these, i.e., the total value of the bank. So if buybacks lead to a higher total value of the bank via a higher share price, it will not only be shareholder-friendly but also leave the acquiring bank less room to offer a reasonable "premium". A large part of my investments are in banks that currently use share buybacks. I can see in my data how significant an impact it has on the share price. Therefore, the initiation of a large share buyback program is the very best buy signal. Therefore: @ Kreditbanken: You will be able to deliver a stock split and a buyback program when the annual report for 2026 is submitted (you are actually the only one on Bankdata not currently doing so) @ Jyske Bank: A stock split is also approaching for you. I think, however, that you, better than most, have understood the value of share buybacks – thank you for that. @ SJF Bank: Good to see you getting started with the share buyback. The question is, isn't there room for a larger program next year? @ Møns Bank and Lollands Bank: Voting restrictions alone will not be enough the day the economic cycle turns @ My fellow investors: Enjoy the summerI also think there are still some cost percentages around that could be trimmed a bit - that would mean a lot.
- ·6.7.Price 400 - so there are only 100 price points up to a reasonably fair value...They need to get the share price up to maintain independence. Otherwise, they will be acquired. So yes - 500 should be the minimum we need to reach for DKs best-run bank. RIBA though perhaps even a notch better?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt