2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
22 päivää sitten
11,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
2,39%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 13 | - | - | ||
| 28 | - | - | ||
| 106 | - | - | ||
| 18 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 |
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·15 t sittenWhat does the panel say...... Would SJF be an obvious acquisition candidate going forward? Personally, I think it could happen, that's naturally also why I'm in :)
Yes, they can either buy other banks (Lolland or Møn) or be bought themselves (Sydbank, Jyske Bank, Nykredit).- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI just increased a bit now too :) Good signal to send: SJF Bank's CEO buys shares for almost 400,000 kr. Close today at 09:51 ∙ MarketWire Lars Petersson, who is the CEO of SJF Bank, has bought shares in the bank for almost 400,000 kr. This is shown by a report from the bank to the stock exchange. The CEO has on September 1 bought a total of 852 shares at a total market value of 389,790 kr. This corresponds to a price per share of 457.50 kr. On Wednesday, a share in SJF Bank costs 455 kr. after a fall of 0.6 pct
·19.8.Great turnover yesterday: 36,700 units at closing time. Well above the average of the last three months (16,600 units/day). Today we are already at almost 11,000 units, less than an hour after the market opened. It looks like exciting things are happening, and it's surely not just private investors driving it? The number of owners in Nordnet has increased by 38 in the last month.Yes, a remarkable point. In fact, SJF is the Danish bank that has risen the most in the last 3 months. A full 37%. I think it will be a take-over prize......
·14.8.A long-awaited Q2 report for SJF was published today. First impression: The fantastic result from the Q1 report could not quite be followed up. Not a bad result in Q2 – just more average. While net interest income due to increased lending is developing positively, all other financial statement items are trending downwards compared to Q1. Nothing drastic – just a little less uplifting than Q1. However, there is one element that leaves me more positive than at first glance of the report – but it requires a bit of accounting acumen and patience to find. My approach is always to distinguish between one-off income and expenses and recurring income and expenses. While the profit before tax was 235 mio. kr. in Q1, the profit in Q2 was 193 mio. kr. I had hoped for and expected a profit on the good side of 200 mio. kr. in Q2. When this does not materialize, it is due, among other things, to a write-down of 26 mio. kr. on "Investment properties" in H1 (distributed with 9 mio. kr. in Q1 and 17 mio. kr. in Q2). This is a significant write-down on a total portfolio of approx. 300 mio. kr. And it is not mentioned with many words in the report. I strongly assume that a distinction is made between owner-occupied properties, which the bank itself uses, and investment properties, which are likely taken over from distressed customers. With an increase of 80 mio. kr. in H1 and a fair value adjustment of -26 mio. kr., I assume that the loss should have been recognized elsewhere in the financial statements if the properties had not been taken over. A loss just makes less noise when it is included in fair value adjustments than as a recognized loss on a customer relationship… Regardless, it would be reasonable to assume that the negative fair value adjustment on a total portfolio of 300 mio. kr. cannot continue at the same pace. In reality, it should be 0 kr. going forward, if adjustments have been made according to regulations. And then we will again be able to hit a profit before tax of 200+ mio. kr. The most positive element in the report is the increase in lending. This gives hope that top-line growth will continue. With a total profit before tax (despite these negative fair value adjustments) of 428 mio. kr. after H1, we can probably agree that it is not aggressive to maintain full-year expectations at 750-825 mio. kr… An upward adjustment should be expected in Q4. Overall, it is still my opinion that the share price (when not taking into account any sudden geopolitical conditions) should be heading towards 500First and foremost, it applies across the banks that there is typically a bit of "shopping" between comparing with the corresponding quarter last year, the previous quarter or the corresponding half-year last year. This provides a certain flexibility in terms of conjuring up the most favorable picture ;-) In this specific case, I read the numbers a bit differently (probably just because I compare with the corresponding half-year in 2025). Here one will be able to see that the other administrative costs, which are falling, are actually "under control", while it is salary costs that constitute the most significant increase. I don't think there's anything surprising about the cost increase in salaries in a situation where the business volume is increasing significantly. There are 27 more full-time employees hired over the past year. But it is clear that this increase puts pressure on it to also materialize on the revenue side. And here I think that several of the "growing" (I hate the word) banks still need to prove something. I am aware, however, that it takes time before new branches and employees can truly be spotted on the top line, but I expect SJF Bank and e.g. Skjern Bank will show increased earnings in Q3 and Q4.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
22 päivää sitten
11,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
2,39%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·15 t sittenWhat does the panel say...... Would SJF be an obvious acquisition candidate going forward? Personally, I think it could happen, that's naturally also why I'm in :)Yes, they can either buy other banks (Lolland or Møn) or be bought themselves (Sydbank, Jyske Bank, Nykredit).
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI just increased a bit now too :) Good signal to send: SJF Bank's CEO buys shares for almost 400,000 kr. Close today at 09:51 ∙ MarketWire Lars Petersson, who is the CEO of SJF Bank, has bought shares in the bank for almost 400,000 kr. This is shown by a report from the bank to the stock exchange. The CEO has on September 1 bought a total of 852 shares at a total market value of 389,790 kr. This corresponds to a price per share of 457.50 kr. On Wednesday, a share in SJF Bank costs 455 kr. after a fall of 0.6 pct
- ·19.8.Great turnover yesterday: 36,700 units at closing time. Well above the average of the last three months (16,600 units/day). Today we are already at almost 11,000 units, less than an hour after the market opened. It looks like exciting things are happening, and it's surely not just private investors driving it? The number of owners in Nordnet has increased by 38 in the last month.Yes, a remarkable point. In fact, SJF is the Danish bank that has risen the most in the last 3 months. A full 37%. I think it will be a take-over prize......
- ·14.8.A long-awaited Q2 report for SJF was published today. First impression: The fantastic result from the Q1 report could not quite be followed up. Not a bad result in Q2 – just more average. While net interest income due to increased lending is developing positively, all other financial statement items are trending downwards compared to Q1. Nothing drastic – just a little less uplifting than Q1. However, there is one element that leaves me more positive than at first glance of the report – but it requires a bit of accounting acumen and patience to find. My approach is always to distinguish between one-off income and expenses and recurring income and expenses. While the profit before tax was 235 mio. kr. in Q1, the profit in Q2 was 193 mio. kr. I had hoped for and expected a profit on the good side of 200 mio. kr. in Q2. When this does not materialize, it is due, among other things, to a write-down of 26 mio. kr. on "Investment properties" in H1 (distributed with 9 mio. kr. in Q1 and 17 mio. kr. in Q2). This is a significant write-down on a total portfolio of approx. 300 mio. kr. And it is not mentioned with many words in the report. I strongly assume that a distinction is made between owner-occupied properties, which the bank itself uses, and investment properties, which are likely taken over from distressed customers. With an increase of 80 mio. kr. in H1 and a fair value adjustment of -26 mio. kr., I assume that the loss should have been recognized elsewhere in the financial statements if the properties had not been taken over. A loss just makes less noise when it is included in fair value adjustments than as a recognized loss on a customer relationship… Regardless, it would be reasonable to assume that the negative fair value adjustment on a total portfolio of 300 mio. kr. cannot continue at the same pace. In reality, it should be 0 kr. going forward, if adjustments have been made according to regulations. And then we will again be able to hit a profit before tax of 200+ mio. kr. The most positive element in the report is the increase in lending. This gives hope that top-line growth will continue. With a total profit before tax (despite these negative fair value adjustments) of 428 mio. kr. after H1, we can probably agree that it is not aggressive to maintain full-year expectations at 750-825 mio. kr… An upward adjustment should be expected in Q4. Overall, it is still my opinion that the share price (when not taking into account any sudden geopolitical conditions) should be heading towards 500First and foremost, it applies across the banks that there is typically a bit of "shopping" between comparing with the corresponding quarter last year, the previous quarter or the corresponding half-year last year. This provides a certain flexibility in terms of conjuring up the most favorable picture ;-) In this specific case, I read the numbers a bit differently (probably just because I compare with the corresponding half-year in 2025). Here one will be able to see that the other administrative costs, which are falling, are actually "under control", while it is salary costs that constitute the most significant increase. I don't think there's anything surprising about the cost increase in salaries in a situation where the business volume is increasing significantly. There are 27 more full-time employees hired over the past year. But it is clear that this increase puts pressure on it to also materialize on the revenue side. And here I think that several of the "growing" (I hate the word) banks still need to prove something. I am aware, however, that it takes time before new branches and employees can truly be spotted on the top line, but I expect SJF Bank and e.g. Skjern Bank will show increased earnings in Q3 and Q4.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 13 | - | - | ||
| 28 | - | - | ||
| 106 | - | - | ||
| 18 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
22 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 13.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 4.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 |
11,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
2,39%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·15 t sittenWhat does the panel say...... Would SJF be an obvious acquisition candidate going forward? Personally, I think it could happen, that's naturally also why I'm in :)Yes, they can either buy other banks (Lolland or Møn) or be bought themselves (Sydbank, Jyske Bank, Nykredit).
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI just increased a bit now too :) Good signal to send: SJF Bank's CEO buys shares for almost 400,000 kr. Close today at 09:51 ∙ MarketWire Lars Petersson, who is the CEO of SJF Bank, has bought shares in the bank for almost 400,000 kr. This is shown by a report from the bank to the stock exchange. The CEO has on September 1 bought a total of 852 shares at a total market value of 389,790 kr. This corresponds to a price per share of 457.50 kr. On Wednesday, a share in SJF Bank costs 455 kr. after a fall of 0.6 pct
- ·19.8.Great turnover yesterday: 36,700 units at closing time. Well above the average of the last three months (16,600 units/day). Today we are already at almost 11,000 units, less than an hour after the market opened. It looks like exciting things are happening, and it's surely not just private investors driving it? The number of owners in Nordnet has increased by 38 in the last month.Yes, a remarkable point. In fact, SJF is the Danish bank that has risen the most in the last 3 months. A full 37%. I think it will be a take-over prize......
- ·14.8.A long-awaited Q2 report for SJF was published today. First impression: The fantastic result from the Q1 report could not quite be followed up. Not a bad result in Q2 – just more average. While net interest income due to increased lending is developing positively, all other financial statement items are trending downwards compared to Q1. Nothing drastic – just a little less uplifting than Q1. However, there is one element that leaves me more positive than at first glance of the report – but it requires a bit of accounting acumen and patience to find. My approach is always to distinguish between one-off income and expenses and recurring income and expenses. While the profit before tax was 235 mio. kr. in Q1, the profit in Q2 was 193 mio. kr. I had hoped for and expected a profit on the good side of 200 mio. kr. in Q2. When this does not materialize, it is due, among other things, to a write-down of 26 mio. kr. on "Investment properties" in H1 (distributed with 9 mio. kr. in Q1 and 17 mio. kr. in Q2). This is a significant write-down on a total portfolio of approx. 300 mio. kr. And it is not mentioned with many words in the report. I strongly assume that a distinction is made between owner-occupied properties, which the bank itself uses, and investment properties, which are likely taken over from distressed customers. With an increase of 80 mio. kr. in H1 and a fair value adjustment of -26 mio. kr., I assume that the loss should have been recognized elsewhere in the financial statements if the properties had not been taken over. A loss just makes less noise when it is included in fair value adjustments than as a recognized loss on a customer relationship… Regardless, it would be reasonable to assume that the negative fair value adjustment on a total portfolio of 300 mio. kr. cannot continue at the same pace. In reality, it should be 0 kr. going forward, if adjustments have been made according to regulations. And then we will again be able to hit a profit before tax of 200+ mio. kr. The most positive element in the report is the increase in lending. This gives hope that top-line growth will continue. With a total profit before tax (despite these negative fair value adjustments) of 428 mio. kr. after H1, we can probably agree that it is not aggressive to maintain full-year expectations at 750-825 mio. kr… An upward adjustment should be expected in Q4. Overall, it is still my opinion that the share price (when not taking into account any sudden geopolitical conditions) should be heading towards 500First and foremost, it applies across the banks that there is typically a bit of "shopping" between comparing with the corresponding quarter last year, the previous quarter or the corresponding half-year last year. This provides a certain flexibility in terms of conjuring up the most favorable picture ;-) In this specific case, I read the numbers a bit differently (probably just because I compare with the corresponding half-year in 2025). Here one will be able to see that the other administrative costs, which are falling, are actually "under control", while it is salary costs that constitute the most significant increase. I don't think there's anything surprising about the cost increase in salaries in a situation where the business volume is increasing significantly. There are 27 more full-time employees hired over the past year. But it is clear that this increase puts pressure on it to also materialize on the revenue side. And here I think that several of the "growing" (I hate the word) banks still need to prove something. I am aware, however, that it takes time before new branches and employees can truly be spotted on the top line, but I expect SJF Bank and e.g. Skjern Bank will show increased earnings in Q3 and Q4.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 13 | - | - | ||
| 28 | - | - | ||
| 106 | - | - | ||
| 18 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt