Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.

Skjern Bank

Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
16 päivää sitten
3,50 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,85%Tuotto/v

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMäärä
15
10
4
8
13

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta

Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti
5.2.2027
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
29.10.
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
14.8.
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti
7.5.
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti
6.2.
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti
30.10.2025

Uutiset

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    31.10.
    ·
    Q3 BANK REPORTS - WHAT TRENDS CAN BE SPOTTED? This is neither a recommendation nor a complete analysis - rather just some observations based on the reported Q3 bank reports for Danske Bank, Nordea, Jyske Bank and Skjern Bank. The observations are made at a time when tech stocks are falling sharply - and the doomsday prophets have started to appear. I may well have an opinion on this dimension, but it is no more qualified than your own, so the below is solely based on the Q3 reports of the mentioned banks. Despite all market participants emphasizing the fierce competition among banks at the moment (and I have no basis to doubt this), it surprisingly appears that net interest income has bottomed out for this time. Danske Bank's net interest income is all-time high, Skjern Bank has historically only had one quarter that was better (Q4 2023), while the turnaround is also clear at Jyske Bank. Nordea's development is lagging slightly behind, but the turnaround has happened. With continued rising lending (though stagnating at Jyske Bank), it must be expected that the coming quarters will be quite favorable for us bank investors on the top line of the income statement. The interest rate hike that has already taken place is expected to begin hitting harder in the coming period. Note by the way that the analysis published by Danske Bank last Thursday on SJF Bank (which resulted in a nice increase for SJF Bank) has built-in an estimate with an increase in net interest income of 23.7% from 2026 to 2027. We naturally cannot use isolated analyses to conclude on the entire industry - but I believe there is consensus on higher top lines. Here it is worth noting a single factor: While high interest rates are intuitively favorable for the result, the movement from low interest rates to high interest rates costs in the banks' income statements. The banks' fair value adjustments of interest-bearing assets thus weigh heavily down in a quarter where interest rates have been rising. For Jyske Bank, the fair value adjustments have "cost" approx. 300 million DKK on the result in Q3 2026 compared to Q2 2026 or Q3 2025. This is therefore not an insignificant factor when the total profit of 1,727 million DKK for Q3 is assessed. Even though the value adjustment is real enough, it is one of the factors that I would like to have normalized in my calculations of expected future earnings. As you might know, one of my favorite topics is management judgement ("post-model adjustments"), which the managements of the Danish banks have approached quite differently - and not surprisingly, as the concept itself is fluffy. It is the dummy variable that managements have to adjust for Corona, Ukraine, agricultural packages or... As an analyst (and auditor) and investor, it is frustrating that this opportunity is given without us getting further insight into how the amount is determined. Furthermore, we typically really have to scrutinize the reports to get the figure established. Currently, Jyske Bank, for example, in Q3 has provisioned an additional 119 million DKK for losses in "post-model adjustments" with the justification "reflecting among other things, risks involved in the expected economic development". This is not an accusation against Jyske Bank, as they are neither worse nor better than the other banks, but it is again clear that management judgement is a black box for us investors and owners. However, in my attempt to deduce a normalized earnings for Jyske Bank, I can conclude again that I must adjust for the 119 million DKK in Q3. So when I adjust for the fair value adjustments and the increased loss provisions due to management judgements, I will actually almost be disappointed if the profit before tax in Q4 does not exceed 2 billion DKK. "All other things being equal" (and I know this is a heavy assumption in a changing world), I look forward with confidence to the coming quarters as a bank investor.
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    26.10.
    ·
    Exciting that it is on its way up 🤓
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    22.10.
    ·
    It is quite wild that it is falling almost 5%, what is the reason for that?
    Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    26.10. · Muokattu
    ·
    It is quite wild that it is rising almost 5%. I wonder what is causing that? Let's just hope there isn't a nervous investor considering buying/selling due to confusion.
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    19.10.
    ·
    hope the support holds at kurs 400. RSI stabilizes above 40 The price takes back 410
    Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    19.10.
    ·
    But why has it fallen almost 10% in the last month?
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    12.10.
    ·
    Question: The 20-day and 50-day SMA (Simple Moving Average) charts change values (trajectory) depending on how long a period is used. For example, the trajectory of the last month on the 3-month charts is completely different than on the 1-month chart. Why?
    Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    16.10.
    ·
    because it is based on the resolution in the graph
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
16 päivää sitten
3,50 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,85%Tuotto/v

Uutiset

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    31.10.
    ·
    Q3 BANK REPORTS - WHAT TRENDS CAN BE SPOTTED? This is neither a recommendation nor a complete analysis - rather just some observations based on the reported Q3 bank reports for Danske Bank, Nordea, Jyske Bank and Skjern Bank. The observations are made at a time when tech stocks are falling sharply - and the doomsday prophets have started to appear. I may well have an opinion on this dimension, but it is no more qualified than your own, so the below is solely based on the Q3 reports of the mentioned banks. Despite all market participants emphasizing the fierce competition among banks at the moment (and I have no basis to doubt this), it surprisingly appears that net interest income has bottomed out for this time. Danske Bank's net interest income is all-time high, Skjern Bank has historically only had one quarter that was better (Q4 2023), while the turnaround is also clear at Jyske Bank. Nordea's development is lagging slightly behind, but the turnaround has happened. With continued rising lending (though stagnating at Jyske Bank), it must be expected that the coming quarters will be quite favorable for us bank investors on the top line of the income statement. The interest rate hike that has already taken place is expected to begin hitting harder in the coming period. Note by the way that the analysis published by Danske Bank last Thursday on SJF Bank (which resulted in a nice increase for SJF Bank) has built-in an estimate with an increase in net interest income of 23.7% from 2026 to 2027. We naturally cannot use isolated analyses to conclude on the entire industry - but I believe there is consensus on higher top lines. Here it is worth noting a single factor: While high interest rates are intuitively favorable for the result, the movement from low interest rates to high interest rates costs in the banks' income statements. The banks' fair value adjustments of interest-bearing assets thus weigh heavily down in a quarter where interest rates have been rising. For Jyske Bank, the fair value adjustments have "cost" approx. 300 million DKK on the result in Q3 2026 compared to Q2 2026 or Q3 2025. This is therefore not an insignificant factor when the total profit of 1,727 million DKK for Q3 is assessed. Even though the value adjustment is real enough, it is one of the factors that I would like to have normalized in my calculations of expected future earnings. As you might know, one of my favorite topics is management judgement ("post-model adjustments"), which the managements of the Danish banks have approached quite differently - and not surprisingly, as the concept itself is fluffy. It is the dummy variable that managements have to adjust for Corona, Ukraine, agricultural packages or... As an analyst (and auditor) and investor, it is frustrating that this opportunity is given without us getting further insight into how the amount is determined. Furthermore, we typically really have to scrutinize the reports to get the figure established. Currently, Jyske Bank, for example, in Q3 has provisioned an additional 119 million DKK for losses in "post-model adjustments" with the justification "reflecting among other things, risks involved in the expected economic development". This is not an accusation against Jyske Bank, as they are neither worse nor better than the other banks, but it is again clear that management judgement is a black box for us investors and owners. However, in my attempt to deduce a normalized earnings for Jyske Bank, I can conclude again that I must adjust for the 119 million DKK in Q3. So when I adjust for the fair value adjustments and the increased loss provisions due to management judgements, I will actually almost be disappointed if the profit before tax in Q4 does not exceed 2 billion DKK. "All other things being equal" (and I know this is a heavy assumption in a changing world), I look forward with confidence to the coming quarters as a bank investor.
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    26.10.
    ·
    Exciting that it is on its way up 🤓
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    22.10.
    ·
    It is quite wild that it is falling almost 5%, what is the reason for that?
    Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    26.10. · Muokattu
    ·
    It is quite wild that it is rising almost 5%. I wonder what is causing that? Let's just hope there isn't a nervous investor considering buying/selling due to confusion.
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    19.10.
    ·
    hope the support holds at kurs 400. RSI stabilizes above 40 The price takes back 410
    Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    19.10.
    ·
    But why has it fallen almost 10% in the last month?
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    12.10.
    ·
    Question: The 20-day and 50-day SMA (Simple Moving Average) charts change values (trajectory) depending on how long a period is used. For example, the trajectory of the last month on the 3-month charts is completely different than on the 1-month chart. Why?
    Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    16.10.
    ·
    because it is based on the resolution in the graph
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMäärä
15
10
4
8
13

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta

Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti
5.2.2027
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
29.10.
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
14.8.
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti
7.5.
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti
6.2.
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti
30.10.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
16 päivää sitten

Uutiset

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti
5.2.2027
Menneet tapahtumat
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
29.10.
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
14.8.
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti
7.5.
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti
6.2.
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti
30.10.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

3,50 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,85%Tuotto/v

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    31.10.
    ·
    Q3 BANK REPORTS - WHAT TRENDS CAN BE SPOTTED? This is neither a recommendation nor a complete analysis - rather just some observations based on the reported Q3 bank reports for Danske Bank, Nordea, Jyske Bank and Skjern Bank. The observations are made at a time when tech stocks are falling sharply - and the doomsday prophets have started to appear. I may well have an opinion on this dimension, but it is no more qualified than your own, so the below is solely based on the Q3 reports of the mentioned banks. Despite all market participants emphasizing the fierce competition among banks at the moment (and I have no basis to doubt this), it surprisingly appears that net interest income has bottomed out for this time. Danske Bank's net interest income is all-time high, Skjern Bank has historically only had one quarter that was better (Q4 2023), while the turnaround is also clear at Jyske Bank. Nordea's development is lagging slightly behind, but the turnaround has happened. With continued rising lending (though stagnating at Jyske Bank), it must be expected that the coming quarters will be quite favorable for us bank investors on the top line of the income statement. The interest rate hike that has already taken place is expected to begin hitting harder in the coming period. Note by the way that the analysis published by Danske Bank last Thursday on SJF Bank (which resulted in a nice increase for SJF Bank) has built-in an estimate with an increase in net interest income of 23.7% from 2026 to 2027. We naturally cannot use isolated analyses to conclude on the entire industry - but I believe there is consensus on higher top lines. Here it is worth noting a single factor: While high interest rates are intuitively favorable for the result, the movement from low interest rates to high interest rates costs in the banks' income statements. The banks' fair value adjustments of interest-bearing assets thus weigh heavily down in a quarter where interest rates have been rising. For Jyske Bank, the fair value adjustments have "cost" approx. 300 million DKK on the result in Q3 2026 compared to Q2 2026 or Q3 2025. This is therefore not an insignificant factor when the total profit of 1,727 million DKK for Q3 is assessed. Even though the value adjustment is real enough, it is one of the factors that I would like to have normalized in my calculations of expected future earnings. As you might know, one of my favorite topics is management judgement ("post-model adjustments"), which the managements of the Danish banks have approached quite differently - and not surprisingly, as the concept itself is fluffy. It is the dummy variable that managements have to adjust for Corona, Ukraine, agricultural packages or... As an analyst (and auditor) and investor, it is frustrating that this opportunity is given without us getting further insight into how the amount is determined. Furthermore, we typically really have to scrutinize the reports to get the figure established. Currently, Jyske Bank, for example, in Q3 has provisioned an additional 119 million DKK for losses in "post-model adjustments" with the justification "reflecting among other things, risks involved in the expected economic development". This is not an accusation against Jyske Bank, as they are neither worse nor better than the other banks, but it is again clear that management judgement is a black box for us investors and owners. However, in my attempt to deduce a normalized earnings for Jyske Bank, I can conclude again that I must adjust for the 119 million DKK in Q3. So when I adjust for the fair value adjustments and the increased loss provisions due to management judgements, I will actually almost be disappointed if the profit before tax in Q4 does not exceed 2 billion DKK. "All other things being equal" (and I know this is a heavy assumption in a changing world), I look forward with confidence to the coming quarters as a bank investor.
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    26.10.
    ·
    Exciting that it is on its way up 🤓
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    22.10.
    ·
    It is quite wild that it is falling almost 5%, what is the reason for that?
    Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    26.10. · Muokattu
    ·
    It is quite wild that it is rising almost 5%. I wonder what is causing that? Let's just hope there isn't a nervous investor considering buying/selling due to confusion.
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    19.10.
    ·
    hope the support holds at kurs 400. RSI stabilizes above 40 The price takes back 410
    Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    19.10.
    ·
    But why has it fallen almost 10% in the last month?
  • Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    12.10.
    ·
    Question: The 20-day and 50-day SMA (Simple Moving Average) charts change values (trajectory) depending on how long a period is used. For example, the trajectory of the last month on the 3-month charts is completely different than on the 1-month chart. Why?
    Käyttäjän profiilikuva
    16.10.
    ·
    because it is based on the resolution in the graph
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMäärä
15
10
4
8
13

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta

Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt
© 2026 Nordnet Bank AB.
Nordnet | Alvar Aallon katu 5 C, 3. krs | FI-00100 Helsinki