2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
97 päivää sittenTarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
10 000
Myynti
Määrä
5 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 904 | - | - | ||
| 1 096 | - | - | ||
| 2 259 | - | - | ||
| 150 | - | - | ||
| 20 000 | - | - |
Ylin
7,701VWAP
Alin
7,5VaihtoMäärä
0,3 37 150
VWAP
Ylin
7,701Alin
7,5VaihtoMäärä
0,3 37 150
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 20.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·16.2. · MuokattuI have investigated Solgrid's assets in recent days, and found that Solgrid only owns 10% of Mörghult, 13.7mW, which is the most well-built, and will soon visit the park for inspection. In Sweden, concessions are not needed for solar parks; simply put, it is a free market for building. Solgrid's two parks in Sweden are in a price zone with an average spot price in 2024 of 40.88 öre (SEK), and I would guess the price in practice might have been even lower for solar power. Wind power also creates prominent price bottoms, so I don't have high confidence on the latter point; the solar price might have been higher than 40 öre too. In summary, it is therefore doubtful in my view that a merged company should focus heavily on building parks in Sweden, where the duck curve causes prominent price cannibalization. It is thus Solgrid's Norwegian concessions, applications, and preliminary notifications that I consider as assets in the financial statements. Concessions in Norway are more valuable than the freedom to build in Sweden, because the concession process creates a moat. We nevertheless hope that the concessions progress faster, and just have to accept the loss we've had with the slow concession rounds up until now.- ·12.2.I am for a merger, we are stronger together, but EVERYTHING is about the price. I believe a merger could hypothetically allocate 25% Solgrid, 75% Energeia. I have looked at the two Swedish solar parks Solgrid owns. My considerations are absolutely not to be taken as gospel, it's just a perspective on a hypothetical merger! Mörghult in Västervik 13.7mW single axis tracker (good!). And Varberg Norra (fixed tilt, bifacial, not ideal stand, something we can improve with batteries). The downsides of the parks are that they are both located in SE3, just north of the southern price area, SE4, which is clearly the most favorable market in Sweden. Both parks are in SE3, where the average price in 2024 was 40.88 öre, compared to 56.85 öre in SE4. Electricity prices are volatile now, Norway has had a larger price increase this year than the certain price increase Sweden has had, but without predicting prices, it has for me been a firm benchmark that solar sales in SE4 are much more attractive than SE3. Honestly, if I had built a solar park in SE3, near the border to SE4, I would have thought "damn it, I missed that one". Sweden, like Norway, sends electricity surplus southwards. SE4 has much more electricity shortage, more volatility, massive electricity exchange with Denmark, and thus more value creation for solar park developers. It's impossible to predict, SE3 will probably have good price development over the parks' lifespan, just as I would guess for the zones relevant for Energeia in Norway, NO1 and NO2 (Ålamoen).* Solgrid still has a bit of bad luck with the parks in SE3, but it's not something they need to settle for. Energeia has a lot to contribute to Solgrid in our battery strategy, since the duck curve is much more pronounced in Sweden than in Norway. This summer, Swedes hypothetically got by shifting sales from zenith to evening - very often a one krona higher sales price, on sunny summer days this year, 2025. Solgrid had a 59 million kr deficit in 2024, three times as large a deficit as Energeia. We need to look closely at Solgrid's assets and finances, it's important not to bid too much for a potential merger with Solgrid.. There are many technical professional questions at the center of value creation for Energeia and Solgrid. We need to figure out the 59 million in minus 2024 at Solgrid, they do have producing parks, and a smaller project portfolio than us, which can now be applied for from the municipalities, without concession from NVE. And then we must ensure that a merged company is well managed. Just an observation from Sweden!
·12.2.February 12, 2026 The Board of Directors of Energeia received yesterday evening a proposal for a transaction with Solgrid whereby the companies merge. The Board will use the coming period to evaluate the proposal and will revert to the market with updated information once the offer has been reviewed. For further information, please contact: Jarl Egil Markussen, CEO, e-mail: jarl@energeia.no , tlf: 480 23 214, or Stig Myrseth, Board member, e-mail: stigmyrseth@gmail.com , tlf: 404 02 808 This information is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to the Continuing Obligations and the Securities Trading Act § 5-12.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
97 päivää sittenUutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·16.2. · MuokattuI have investigated Solgrid's assets in recent days, and found that Solgrid only owns 10% of Mörghult, 13.7mW, which is the most well-built, and will soon visit the park for inspection. In Sweden, concessions are not needed for solar parks; simply put, it is a free market for building. Solgrid's two parks in Sweden are in a price zone with an average spot price in 2024 of 40.88 öre (SEK), and I would guess the price in practice might have been even lower for solar power. Wind power also creates prominent price bottoms, so I don't have high confidence on the latter point; the solar price might have been higher than 40 öre too. In summary, it is therefore doubtful in my view that a merged company should focus heavily on building parks in Sweden, where the duck curve causes prominent price cannibalization. It is thus Solgrid's Norwegian concessions, applications, and preliminary notifications that I consider as assets in the financial statements. Concessions in Norway are more valuable than the freedom to build in Sweden, because the concession process creates a moat. We nevertheless hope that the concessions progress faster, and just have to accept the loss we've had with the slow concession rounds up until now.
- ·12.2.I am for a merger, we are stronger together, but EVERYTHING is about the price. I believe a merger could hypothetically allocate 25% Solgrid, 75% Energeia. I have looked at the two Swedish solar parks Solgrid owns. My considerations are absolutely not to be taken as gospel, it's just a perspective on a hypothetical merger! Mörghult in Västervik 13.7mW single axis tracker (good!). And Varberg Norra (fixed tilt, bifacial, not ideal stand, something we can improve with batteries). The downsides of the parks are that they are both located in SE3, just north of the southern price area, SE4, which is clearly the most favorable market in Sweden. Both parks are in SE3, where the average price in 2024 was 40.88 öre, compared to 56.85 öre in SE4. Electricity prices are volatile now, Norway has had a larger price increase this year than the certain price increase Sweden has had, but without predicting prices, it has for me been a firm benchmark that solar sales in SE4 are much more attractive than SE3. Honestly, if I had built a solar park in SE3, near the border to SE4, I would have thought "damn it, I missed that one". Sweden, like Norway, sends electricity surplus southwards. SE4 has much more electricity shortage, more volatility, massive electricity exchange with Denmark, and thus more value creation for solar park developers. It's impossible to predict, SE3 will probably have good price development over the parks' lifespan, just as I would guess for the zones relevant for Energeia in Norway, NO1 and NO2 (Ålamoen).* Solgrid still has a bit of bad luck with the parks in SE3, but it's not something they need to settle for. Energeia has a lot to contribute to Solgrid in our battery strategy, since the duck curve is much more pronounced in Sweden than in Norway. This summer, Swedes hypothetically got by shifting sales from zenith to evening - very often a one krona higher sales price, on sunny summer days this year, 2025. Solgrid had a 59 million kr deficit in 2024, three times as large a deficit as Energeia. We need to look closely at Solgrid's assets and finances, it's important not to bid too much for a potential merger with Solgrid.. There are many technical professional questions at the center of value creation for Energeia and Solgrid. We need to figure out the 59 million in minus 2024 at Solgrid, they do have producing parks, and a smaller project portfolio than us, which can now be applied for from the municipalities, without concession from NVE. And then we must ensure that a merged company is well managed. Just an observation from Sweden!
- ·12.2.February 12, 2026 The Board of Directors of Energeia received yesterday evening a proposal for a transaction with Solgrid whereby the companies merge. The Board will use the coming period to evaluate the proposal and will revert to the market with updated information once the offer has been reviewed. For further information, please contact: Jarl Egil Markussen, CEO, e-mail: jarl@energeia.no , tlf: 480 23 214, or Stig Myrseth, Board member, e-mail: stigmyrseth@gmail.com , tlf: 404 02 808 This information is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to the Continuing Obligations and the Securities Trading Act § 5-12.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
10 000
Myynti
Määrä
5 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 904 | - | - | ||
| 1 096 | - | - | ||
| 2 259 | - | - | ||
| 150 | - | - | ||
| 20 000 | - | - |
Ylin
7,701VWAP
Alin
7,5VaihtoMäärä
0,3 37 150
VWAP
Ylin
7,701Alin
7,5VaihtoMäärä
0,3 37 150
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 20.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2024 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
97 päivää sittenUutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 20.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2024 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·16.2. · MuokattuI have investigated Solgrid's assets in recent days, and found that Solgrid only owns 10% of Mörghult, 13.7mW, which is the most well-built, and will soon visit the park for inspection. In Sweden, concessions are not needed for solar parks; simply put, it is a free market for building. Solgrid's two parks in Sweden are in a price zone with an average spot price in 2024 of 40.88 öre (SEK), and I would guess the price in practice might have been even lower for solar power. Wind power also creates prominent price bottoms, so I don't have high confidence on the latter point; the solar price might have been higher than 40 öre too. In summary, it is therefore doubtful in my view that a merged company should focus heavily on building parks in Sweden, where the duck curve causes prominent price cannibalization. It is thus Solgrid's Norwegian concessions, applications, and preliminary notifications that I consider as assets in the financial statements. Concessions in Norway are more valuable than the freedom to build in Sweden, because the concession process creates a moat. We nevertheless hope that the concessions progress faster, and just have to accept the loss we've had with the slow concession rounds up until now.
- ·12.2.I am for a merger, we are stronger together, but EVERYTHING is about the price. I believe a merger could hypothetically allocate 25% Solgrid, 75% Energeia. I have looked at the two Swedish solar parks Solgrid owns. My considerations are absolutely not to be taken as gospel, it's just a perspective on a hypothetical merger! Mörghult in Västervik 13.7mW single axis tracker (good!). And Varberg Norra (fixed tilt, bifacial, not ideal stand, something we can improve with batteries). The downsides of the parks are that they are both located in SE3, just north of the southern price area, SE4, which is clearly the most favorable market in Sweden. Both parks are in SE3, where the average price in 2024 was 40.88 öre, compared to 56.85 öre in SE4. Electricity prices are volatile now, Norway has had a larger price increase this year than the certain price increase Sweden has had, but without predicting prices, it has for me been a firm benchmark that solar sales in SE4 are much more attractive than SE3. Honestly, if I had built a solar park in SE3, near the border to SE4, I would have thought "damn it, I missed that one". Sweden, like Norway, sends electricity surplus southwards. SE4 has much more electricity shortage, more volatility, massive electricity exchange with Denmark, and thus more value creation for solar park developers. It's impossible to predict, SE3 will probably have good price development over the parks' lifespan, just as I would guess for the zones relevant for Energeia in Norway, NO1 and NO2 (Ålamoen).* Solgrid still has a bit of bad luck with the parks in SE3, but it's not something they need to settle for. Energeia has a lot to contribute to Solgrid in our battery strategy, since the duck curve is much more pronounced in Sweden than in Norway. This summer, Swedes hypothetically got by shifting sales from zenith to evening - very often a one krona higher sales price, on sunny summer days this year, 2025. Solgrid had a 59 million kr deficit in 2024, three times as large a deficit as Energeia. We need to look closely at Solgrid's assets and finances, it's important not to bid too much for a potential merger with Solgrid.. There are many technical professional questions at the center of value creation for Energeia and Solgrid. We need to figure out the 59 million in minus 2024 at Solgrid, they do have producing parks, and a smaller project portfolio than us, which can now be applied for from the municipalities, without concession from NVE. And then we must ensure that a merged company is well managed. Just an observation from Sweden!
- ·12.2.February 12, 2026 The Board of Directors of Energeia received yesterday evening a proposal for a transaction with Solgrid whereby the companies merge. The Board will use the coming period to evaluate the proposal and will revert to the market with updated information once the offer has been reviewed. For further information, please contact: Jarl Egil Markussen, CEO, e-mail: jarl@energeia.no , tlf: 480 23 214, or Stig Myrseth, Board member, e-mail: stigmyrseth@gmail.com , tlf: 404 02 808 This information is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to the Continuing Obligations and the Securities Trading Act § 5-12.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Euronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
10 000
Myynti
Määrä
5 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 904 | - | - | ||
| 1 096 | - | - | ||
| 2 259 | - | - | ||
| 150 | - | - | ||
| 20 000 | - | - |
Ylin
7,701VWAP
Alin
7,5VaihtoMäärä
0,3 37 150
VWAP
Ylin
7,701Alin
7,5VaihtoMäärä
0,3 37 150
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt