2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
14 päivää sitten
‧44 min
66,82 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
26,13%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 10.7.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·8 t sittenhttps://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2026/07/22/8367536/smasparere-i-nordnet-maker-ut-oljeaksjer This is interesting! I'm holding on, but I must admit that it makes me feel a bit uncertain if that's actually the smartest thing I can do.
I assume one makes money regardless. The only possibility to lose money is if Vår Energi were to go down and Bluenord were to go up, or that Bluenord will go so high in relation to Vår that we hit or pass the sum that is calculated (as of now 550), but these will probably follow each other going forward?? What is interesting is the cash component that has been offered. Many say this should/ought to have been larger. I have so few shares and understand that, as @BBBTRH also says in here, it will be as the big players figure out how this deal ultimately turns out. I am staying because I believe I will make money regardless, the question is whether it will be more than what we envision today. I am curious about that.
·10 t sittenSince BlueNord is entering into Vår Energi, it is in our (BlueNord's) interest that the agreement is gold for Vår Energi and not for BlueNord. The agreement could have looked more golden for BlueNord, but then we would have gotten a weakened Vår Energi. Now it's win-win.
·10 t sittenIs it profitable to leave the money invested, or will there continue to be a rather flat increase?
·11 t sittenMany of us are frustrated with the BlueNord/Vår deal. That is completely legitimate. But now it's important to remember one thing: It helps little to be angry at Nordnet, in comment sections and on forums if one doesn't actually vote when the EGF comes. It is the general meeting that decides. Not the Nordnet thread. Not Facebook. Not Discord. Not small talk between shareholders. EGF. If you believe the offer is too low, you must use your voting right. If you cannot attend yourself, then give proxy to someone who can vote on your behalf. Do not let your shares remain passive. Passive shares practically help the side that manages to mobilize best. This is actually now or never. If the agreement goes through as it stands, the standalone case is gone. Then it won't help afterwards to say that the offer was too low, that the premium was ridiculous, that the board lacked ownership feeling, or that we should have been better paid for the cash flow. Then the ship has sailed. So my appeal is simple: Pay attention when the notice for the EGF comes. Find out how to vote via your broker. Vote yourself, vote in advance if possible, or give proxy to someone you trust. If you are dissatisfied with the offer, you must actually vote no. It is not enough to make noise. Noise must be converted into votes. Vote no.
The battle is lost, el-grico. You cannot prevent Vår from buying up to 89.9 percent of Bnor. The only thing you can do is to prevent Vår from buying from 90 percent. If Vår gets 90 percent acceptances, then they can compulsorily redeem the remaining 10 percent. You can only block this by 10.1 percent of the votes refusing to sell their shares. That means you must mobilize over 2,556,721 shares at an extraordinary general meeting. That corresponds to a market value of 1.34 billion kroner. Most Bnor shareholders in Nordnet have 100-10,000 shares. If we assume that a typical Bnor shareholder in Nordnet has 250 shares on average, then you must get 10,227 shareholders to join you at the EGM and get all of them to vote no. Good luck.
·11 t sittenThe news about this merger stings very hard, especially when this merger is more like an acquisition than a merger. Where Bluenord shareholders who have followed for a long time and invested money in a company that has finally gotten the Tyra field to yield a gas production record. And pays down loans and refinances. I just want to say, even as a shareholder who loves Bluenord's dividends. So they are very high and unstable. I think that the previous dividend and earnings during this Iran-USA, Isreal war should be used to provide stable dividends long-term (15% I think), pay down loans and to develop better facilities. According to a German financial newspaper that I will find the link to again. So this acquisition will be very unfavorable for Blurnord shareholders, VAR shareholders will own 91% of the company (VAR) while Bluenord will end up with 9%. If someone can help double check that info, that would be cool👍. I will vote NO. But I agree that Bluenord must cut dividends to (example) 15-20% or 100kr per year with a share price of 500kr. And build up money buffers when oil and gas prices will fall. To continue to provide juicy but stable dividends.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
14 päivää sitten
‧44 min
66,82 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
26,13%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·8 t sittenhttps://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2026/07/22/8367536/smasparere-i-nordnet-maker-ut-oljeaksjer This is interesting! I'm holding on, but I must admit that it makes me feel a bit uncertain if that's actually the smartest thing I can do.I assume one makes money regardless. The only possibility to lose money is if Vår Energi were to go down and Bluenord were to go up, or that Bluenord will go so high in relation to Vår that we hit or pass the sum that is calculated (as of now 550), but these will probably follow each other going forward?? What is interesting is the cash component that has been offered. Many say this should/ought to have been larger. I have so few shares and understand that, as @BBBTRH also says in here, it will be as the big players figure out how this deal ultimately turns out. I am staying because I believe I will make money regardless, the question is whether it will be more than what we envision today. I am curious about that.
- ·10 t sittenSince BlueNord is entering into Vår Energi, it is in our (BlueNord's) interest that the agreement is gold for Vår Energi and not for BlueNord. The agreement could have looked more golden for BlueNord, but then we would have gotten a weakened Vår Energi. Now it's win-win.
- ·10 t sittenIs it profitable to leave the money invested, or will there continue to be a rather flat increase?
- ·11 t sittenMany of us are frustrated with the BlueNord/Vår deal. That is completely legitimate. But now it's important to remember one thing: It helps little to be angry at Nordnet, in comment sections and on forums if one doesn't actually vote when the EGF comes. It is the general meeting that decides. Not the Nordnet thread. Not Facebook. Not Discord. Not small talk between shareholders. EGF. If you believe the offer is too low, you must use your voting right. If you cannot attend yourself, then give proxy to someone who can vote on your behalf. Do not let your shares remain passive. Passive shares practically help the side that manages to mobilize best. This is actually now or never. If the agreement goes through as it stands, the standalone case is gone. Then it won't help afterwards to say that the offer was too low, that the premium was ridiculous, that the board lacked ownership feeling, or that we should have been better paid for the cash flow. Then the ship has sailed. So my appeal is simple: Pay attention when the notice for the EGF comes. Find out how to vote via your broker. Vote yourself, vote in advance if possible, or give proxy to someone you trust. If you are dissatisfied with the offer, you must actually vote no. It is not enough to make noise. Noise must be converted into votes. Vote no.The battle is lost, el-grico. You cannot prevent Vår from buying up to 89.9 percent of Bnor. The only thing you can do is to prevent Vår from buying from 90 percent. If Vår gets 90 percent acceptances, then they can compulsorily redeem the remaining 10 percent. You can only block this by 10.1 percent of the votes refusing to sell their shares. That means you must mobilize over 2,556,721 shares at an extraordinary general meeting. That corresponds to a market value of 1.34 billion kroner. Most Bnor shareholders in Nordnet have 100-10,000 shares. If we assume that a typical Bnor shareholder in Nordnet has 250 shares on average, then you must get 10,227 shareholders to join you at the EGM and get all of them to vote no. Good luck.
- ·11 t sittenThe news about this merger stings very hard, especially when this merger is more like an acquisition than a merger. Where Bluenord shareholders who have followed for a long time and invested money in a company that has finally gotten the Tyra field to yield a gas production record. And pays down loans and refinances. I just want to say, even as a shareholder who loves Bluenord's dividends. So they are very high and unstable. I think that the previous dividend and earnings during this Iran-USA, Isreal war should be used to provide stable dividends long-term (15% I think), pay down loans and to develop better facilities. According to a German financial newspaper that I will find the link to again. So this acquisition will be very unfavorable for Blurnord shareholders, VAR shareholders will own 91% of the company (VAR) while Bluenord will end up with 9%. If someone can help double check that info, that would be cool👍. I will vote NO. But I agree that Bluenord must cut dividends to (example) 15-20% or 100kr per year with a share price of 500kr. And build up money buffers when oil and gas prices will fall. To continue to provide juicy but stable dividends.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 10.7.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
14 päivää sitten
‧44 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 10.7.2025 |
66,82 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
26,13%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·8 t sittenhttps://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2026/07/22/8367536/smasparere-i-nordnet-maker-ut-oljeaksjer This is interesting! I'm holding on, but I must admit that it makes me feel a bit uncertain if that's actually the smartest thing I can do.I assume one makes money regardless. The only possibility to lose money is if Vår Energi were to go down and Bluenord were to go up, or that Bluenord will go so high in relation to Vår that we hit or pass the sum that is calculated (as of now 550), but these will probably follow each other going forward?? What is interesting is the cash component that has been offered. Many say this should/ought to have been larger. I have so few shares and understand that, as @BBBTRH also says in here, it will be as the big players figure out how this deal ultimately turns out. I am staying because I believe I will make money regardless, the question is whether it will be more than what we envision today. I am curious about that.
- ·10 t sittenSince BlueNord is entering into Vår Energi, it is in our (BlueNord's) interest that the agreement is gold for Vår Energi and not for BlueNord. The agreement could have looked more golden for BlueNord, but then we would have gotten a weakened Vår Energi. Now it's win-win.
- ·10 t sittenIs it profitable to leave the money invested, or will there continue to be a rather flat increase?
- ·11 t sittenMany of us are frustrated with the BlueNord/Vår deal. That is completely legitimate. But now it's important to remember one thing: It helps little to be angry at Nordnet, in comment sections and on forums if one doesn't actually vote when the EGF comes. It is the general meeting that decides. Not the Nordnet thread. Not Facebook. Not Discord. Not small talk between shareholders. EGF. If you believe the offer is too low, you must use your voting right. If you cannot attend yourself, then give proxy to someone who can vote on your behalf. Do not let your shares remain passive. Passive shares practically help the side that manages to mobilize best. This is actually now or never. If the agreement goes through as it stands, the standalone case is gone. Then it won't help afterwards to say that the offer was too low, that the premium was ridiculous, that the board lacked ownership feeling, or that we should have been better paid for the cash flow. Then the ship has sailed. So my appeal is simple: Pay attention when the notice for the EGF comes. Find out how to vote via your broker. Vote yourself, vote in advance if possible, or give proxy to someone you trust. If you are dissatisfied with the offer, you must actually vote no. It is not enough to make noise. Noise must be converted into votes. Vote no.The battle is lost, el-grico. You cannot prevent Vår from buying up to 89.9 percent of Bnor. The only thing you can do is to prevent Vår from buying from 90 percent. If Vår gets 90 percent acceptances, then they can compulsorily redeem the remaining 10 percent. You can only block this by 10.1 percent of the votes refusing to sell their shares. That means you must mobilize over 2,556,721 shares at an extraordinary general meeting. That corresponds to a market value of 1.34 billion kroner. Most Bnor shareholders in Nordnet have 100-10,000 shares. If we assume that a typical Bnor shareholder in Nordnet has 250 shares on average, then you must get 10,227 shareholders to join you at the EGM and get all of them to vote no. Good luck.
- ·11 t sittenThe news about this merger stings very hard, especially when this merger is more like an acquisition than a merger. Where Bluenord shareholders who have followed for a long time and invested money in a company that has finally gotten the Tyra field to yield a gas production record. And pays down loans and refinances. I just want to say, even as a shareholder who loves Bluenord's dividends. So they are very high and unstable. I think that the previous dividend and earnings during this Iran-USA, Isreal war should be used to provide stable dividends long-term (15% I think), pay down loans and to develop better facilities. According to a German financial newspaper that I will find the link to again. So this acquisition will be very unfavorable for Blurnord shareholders, VAR shareholders will own 91% of the company (VAR) while Bluenord will end up with 9%. If someone can help double check that info, that would be cool👍. I will vote NO. But I agree that Bluenord must cut dividends to (example) 15-20% or 100kr per year with a share price of 500kr. And build up money buffers when oil and gas prices will fall. To continue to provide juicy but stable dividends.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt