2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
39 päivää sitten
‧44 min
66,82 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
34,20%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 10.7.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·2 t sittenA post for you if you wish to vote on the merger of BlueNord and Vår. Here's how I proceeded: 1. Log in to Euronext VPS 2. Select BlueNord 3. Select "Events" --> General Assembly 4. Select "Advance vote" and tick your choices. Good luck with the vote!
- ·9 t sittenFor me, as a BlueNord owner, to find the deal truly attractive, I would therefore like to see an improved cash consideration of at least 50–75 NOK additional per BlueNord share. Then the risk reduction, Vår Energi's dividends, and the synergies would start to outweigh giving up BlueNord's very strong cash flow just as Tyra has gotten up to speed. That also explains the strange stock market reaction: Vår Energi rose over 5 % when the deal was presented. The market thus seems to consider that Vår Energi is making a good deal.
Has none of the larger owners of BlueNord commented on the "bad" deal? I find it hard to believe that they would agree to a sale that is obviously, according to most, a bad arrangement, or do they see other benefits with the deal? - ·10 t sittenMy friend Chat GPT finds the following analyst's viewpoint: What can be gathered from the analyst reactions is still quite clear: the deal is considered industrially logical, but the price BlueNord owners receive is not obviously generous. Before the deal, analysts' valuations of BlueNord were significantly higher. On July 19, the consensus target price was around 745 NOK, while after the bid/deal it has been sharply adjusted downwards. The latest compilation I find indicates around 602 NOK on average for five analysts. So vote no, for a better bid!
·2 päivää sittenIf it's voted yes at the GM now in August, how quickly can such a thing proceed? I actually imagine it will be lengthy and December is most likely? Could it drag out until next summer if unlucky as well?
·2 päivää sittenIt seems a bit like everyone wants to vote no, why ??
1. Bad timing. It is now that the cash flow is at its highest and the dividend is at its juiciest. The tax increase next year will dampen the dividend somewhat, but not enough to scare me away. 2. Bad bid. The bid has virtually 0 premium. If we had received a 15-20% premium on the sale, most of us would probably have said yes. 3. Personally, I think it has been a far too poor and under-communicated process from the board regarding what they have based it on and why they believe the merger is the best for the company. 4. Personally, I am in here for "high risk - high reward". If I wanted stability, I would have bought VAR/EQNR instead of BNOR. I myself stopped buying more BNOR when the news came and have instead loaded up on PEN.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
39 päivää sitten
‧44 min
66,82 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
34,20%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenA post for you if you wish to vote on the merger of BlueNord and Vår. Here's how I proceeded: 1. Log in to Euronext VPS 2. Select BlueNord 3. Select "Events" --> General Assembly 4. Select "Advance vote" and tick your choices. Good luck with the vote!
- ·9 t sittenFor me, as a BlueNord owner, to find the deal truly attractive, I would therefore like to see an improved cash consideration of at least 50–75 NOK additional per BlueNord share. Then the risk reduction, Vår Energi's dividends, and the synergies would start to outweigh giving up BlueNord's very strong cash flow just as Tyra has gotten up to speed. That also explains the strange stock market reaction: Vår Energi rose over 5 % when the deal was presented. The market thus seems to consider that Vår Energi is making a good deal.Has none of the larger owners of BlueNord commented on the "bad" deal? I find it hard to believe that they would agree to a sale that is obviously, according to most, a bad arrangement, or do they see other benefits with the deal?
- ·10 t sittenMy friend Chat GPT finds the following analyst's viewpoint: What can be gathered from the analyst reactions is still quite clear: the deal is considered industrially logical, but the price BlueNord owners receive is not obviously generous. Before the deal, analysts' valuations of BlueNord were significantly higher. On July 19, the consensus target price was around 745 NOK, while after the bid/deal it has been sharply adjusted downwards. The latest compilation I find indicates around 602 NOK on average for five analysts. So vote no, for a better bid!
- ·2 päivää sittenIf it's voted yes at the GM now in August, how quickly can such a thing proceed? I actually imagine it will be lengthy and December is most likely? Could it drag out until next summer if unlucky as well?
- ·2 päivää sittenIt seems a bit like everyone wants to vote no, why ??1. Bad timing. It is now that the cash flow is at its highest and the dividend is at its juiciest. The tax increase next year will dampen the dividend somewhat, but not enough to scare me away. 2. Bad bid. The bid has virtually 0 premium. If we had received a 15-20% premium on the sale, most of us would probably have said yes. 3. Personally, I think it has been a far too poor and under-communicated process from the board regarding what they have based it on and why they believe the merger is the best for the company. 4. Personally, I am in here for "high risk - high reward". If I wanted stability, I would have bought VAR/EQNR instead of BNOR. I myself stopped buying more BNOR when the news came and have instead loaded up on PEN.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 10.7.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
39 päivää sitten
‧44 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 10.7.2025 |
66,82 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
34,20%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenA post for you if you wish to vote on the merger of BlueNord and Vår. Here's how I proceeded: 1. Log in to Euronext VPS 2. Select BlueNord 3. Select "Events" --> General Assembly 4. Select "Advance vote" and tick your choices. Good luck with the vote!
- ·9 t sittenFor me, as a BlueNord owner, to find the deal truly attractive, I would therefore like to see an improved cash consideration of at least 50–75 NOK additional per BlueNord share. Then the risk reduction, Vår Energi's dividends, and the synergies would start to outweigh giving up BlueNord's very strong cash flow just as Tyra has gotten up to speed. That also explains the strange stock market reaction: Vår Energi rose over 5 % when the deal was presented. The market thus seems to consider that Vår Energi is making a good deal.Has none of the larger owners of BlueNord commented on the "bad" deal? I find it hard to believe that they would agree to a sale that is obviously, according to most, a bad arrangement, or do they see other benefits with the deal?
- ·10 t sittenMy friend Chat GPT finds the following analyst's viewpoint: What can be gathered from the analyst reactions is still quite clear: the deal is considered industrially logical, but the price BlueNord owners receive is not obviously generous. Before the deal, analysts' valuations of BlueNord were significantly higher. On July 19, the consensus target price was around 745 NOK, while after the bid/deal it has been sharply adjusted downwards. The latest compilation I find indicates around 602 NOK on average for five analysts. So vote no, for a better bid!
- ·2 päivää sittenIf it's voted yes at the GM now in August, how quickly can such a thing proceed? I actually imagine it will be lengthy and December is most likely? Could it drag out until next summer if unlucky as well?
- ·2 päivää sittenIt seems a bit like everyone wants to vote no, why ??1. Bad timing. It is now that the cash flow is at its highest and the dividend is at its juiciest. The tax increase next year will dampen the dividend somewhat, but not enough to scare me away. 2. Bad bid. The bid has virtually 0 premium. If we had received a 15-20% premium on the sale, most of us would probably have said yes. 3. Personally, I think it has been a far too poor and under-communicated process from the board regarding what they have based it on and why they believe the merger is the best for the company. 4. Personally, I am in here for "high risk - high reward". If I wanted stability, I would have bought VAR/EQNR instead of BNOR. I myself stopped buying more BNOR when the news came and have instead loaded up on PEN.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt