2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
41 päivää sitten
‧34 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 390 | - | - | ||
| 2 198 | - | - | ||
| 262 | - | - | ||
| 390 | - | - | ||
| 279 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·8 t sittenWonder who took 500k at 1,988 🫶
- ·1 päivä sittenMany in the KOA forums still refer to the stock as a pure turnaround-case and often criticize those who sell or lose patience. But from an investor's perspective, opportunity cost is important to consider. An example: A hypothetical purchase of 100,000 kr in KOA in the autumn of 2020 at GAV 2.32 is today worth approx. 87,000 kr at a price of 2.02. Adjusted for inflation (CPI 25-26 %) the investment would have had to be around 126,000 kr just to preserve purchasing power. At the same time, Oslo Børs has risen around 75–80 % in the same period. In order to: • break even nominally, KOA must return to 2.32 • preserve purchasing power, it must reach approx. 2.9 • match broad market returns, it must approach 4 kr+ It is therefore fully legitimate to consider other investments rather than waiting for years for a turnaround to perhaps materialize. I myself hold shares in KOA, having been invested for over 6 years. I blame myself for only partially selling down and not everything. I feel that I have not been rational here and that I should have taken an earlier and more drastic solution. However, I think I will hold onto the stock and see what happens until 2026. I am cautiously hopeful.·2 t sittenThe stock split proposal should be something that comes up for consideration as daily penny changes are not positive for the stock. It can also get more small shareholders out and more serious players in. The remarkable thing here, otherwise, is that the price regularly was in the price range 2,5-3,0 and had some movements up towards 4 kr earlier in the pandemic period. Considering "all the positive" that has happened in the last couple of years, the price is now +- 2, after having fluctuated between 1,80-2,30, with 1,90-2,10 as the median. This is of course far too weak considering the stock market's development in the same period, and has contributed little to much "return" for any of the shareholders who have been with the stock for longer periods. So we'll have to wait and see what meaning the company attaches to creating shareholder value.....this has probably been on the company's website for 10 years and if there's one thing the company hasn't managed....it's precisely creating shareholder value. Therefore, it is important now that this is truly focused on by management/owners. It is more than astonishing that this company cannot manage to materialize greater value creation for shareholders than what has been delivered over many years. I believe that the company, upon a sale, will achieve a clearly greater value than the company itself can generate, but it is probably possible that AF and the largest shareholders must have another round with management and the board. As far as I can recall, the shareholder settlement at that time was dissatisfied with the price when it was +- 2,50.....now 2-3 years later the price is 20-25 % lower. This cannot continue if the company is to have any future on the stock exchange.
- ·2 päivää sittenFeel sorry for those who sold for under 2 kr. This one will go up. A bit of an overreaction today. The biggest have bought more, as several have pointed out. Oh well.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
41 päivää sitten
‧34 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·8 t sittenWonder who took 500k at 1,988 🫶
- ·1 päivä sittenMany in the KOA forums still refer to the stock as a pure turnaround-case and often criticize those who sell or lose patience. But from an investor's perspective, opportunity cost is important to consider. An example: A hypothetical purchase of 100,000 kr in KOA in the autumn of 2020 at GAV 2.32 is today worth approx. 87,000 kr at a price of 2.02. Adjusted for inflation (CPI 25-26 %) the investment would have had to be around 126,000 kr just to preserve purchasing power. At the same time, Oslo Børs has risen around 75–80 % in the same period. In order to: • break even nominally, KOA must return to 2.32 • preserve purchasing power, it must reach approx. 2.9 • match broad market returns, it must approach 4 kr+ It is therefore fully legitimate to consider other investments rather than waiting for years for a turnaround to perhaps materialize. I myself hold shares in KOA, having been invested for over 6 years. I blame myself for only partially selling down and not everything. I feel that I have not been rational here and that I should have taken an earlier and more drastic solution. However, I think I will hold onto the stock and see what happens until 2026. I am cautiously hopeful.·2 t sittenThe stock split proposal should be something that comes up for consideration as daily penny changes are not positive for the stock. It can also get more small shareholders out and more serious players in. The remarkable thing here, otherwise, is that the price regularly was in the price range 2,5-3,0 and had some movements up towards 4 kr earlier in the pandemic period. Considering "all the positive" that has happened in the last couple of years, the price is now +- 2, after having fluctuated between 1,80-2,30, with 1,90-2,10 as the median. This is of course far too weak considering the stock market's development in the same period, and has contributed little to much "return" for any of the shareholders who have been with the stock for longer periods. So we'll have to wait and see what meaning the company attaches to creating shareholder value.....this has probably been on the company's website for 10 years and if there's one thing the company hasn't managed....it's precisely creating shareholder value. Therefore, it is important now that this is truly focused on by management/owners. It is more than astonishing that this company cannot manage to materialize greater value creation for shareholders than what has been delivered over many years. I believe that the company, upon a sale, will achieve a clearly greater value than the company itself can generate, but it is probably possible that AF and the largest shareholders must have another round with management and the board. As far as I can recall, the shareholder settlement at that time was dissatisfied with the price when it was +- 2,50.....now 2-3 years later the price is 20-25 % lower. This cannot continue if the company is to have any future on the stock exchange.
- ·2 päivää sittenFeel sorry for those who sold for under 2 kr. This one will go up. A bit of an overreaction today. The biggest have bought more, as several have pointed out. Oh well.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 390 | - | - | ||
| 2 198 | - | - | ||
| 262 | - | - | ||
| 390 | - | - | ||
| 279 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
41 päivää sitten
‧34 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·8 t sittenWonder who took 500k at 1,988 🫶
- ·1 päivä sittenMany in the KOA forums still refer to the stock as a pure turnaround-case and often criticize those who sell or lose patience. But from an investor's perspective, opportunity cost is important to consider. An example: A hypothetical purchase of 100,000 kr in KOA in the autumn of 2020 at GAV 2.32 is today worth approx. 87,000 kr at a price of 2.02. Adjusted for inflation (CPI 25-26 %) the investment would have had to be around 126,000 kr just to preserve purchasing power. At the same time, Oslo Børs has risen around 75–80 % in the same period. In order to: • break even nominally, KOA must return to 2.32 • preserve purchasing power, it must reach approx. 2.9 • match broad market returns, it must approach 4 kr+ It is therefore fully legitimate to consider other investments rather than waiting for years for a turnaround to perhaps materialize. I myself hold shares in KOA, having been invested for over 6 years. I blame myself for only partially selling down and not everything. I feel that I have not been rational here and that I should have taken an earlier and more drastic solution. However, I think I will hold onto the stock and see what happens until 2026. I am cautiously hopeful.·2 t sittenThe stock split proposal should be something that comes up for consideration as daily penny changes are not positive for the stock. It can also get more small shareholders out and more serious players in. The remarkable thing here, otherwise, is that the price regularly was in the price range 2,5-3,0 and had some movements up towards 4 kr earlier in the pandemic period. Considering "all the positive" that has happened in the last couple of years, the price is now +- 2, after having fluctuated between 1,80-2,30, with 1,90-2,10 as the median. This is of course far too weak considering the stock market's development in the same period, and has contributed little to much "return" for any of the shareholders who have been with the stock for longer periods. So we'll have to wait and see what meaning the company attaches to creating shareholder value.....this has probably been on the company's website for 10 years and if there's one thing the company hasn't managed....it's precisely creating shareholder value. Therefore, it is important now that this is truly focused on by management/owners. It is more than astonishing that this company cannot manage to materialize greater value creation for shareholders than what has been delivered over many years. I believe that the company, upon a sale, will achieve a clearly greater value than the company itself can generate, but it is probably possible that AF and the largest shareholders must have another round with management and the board. As far as I can recall, the shareholder settlement at that time was dissatisfied with the price when it was +- 2,50.....now 2-3 years later the price is 20-25 % lower. This cannot continue if the company is to have any future on the stock exchange.
- ·2 päivää sittenFeel sorry for those who sold for under 2 kr. This one will go up. A bit of an overreaction today. The biggest have bought more, as several have pointed out. Oh well.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 390 | - | - | ||
| 2 198 | - | - | ||
| 262 | - | - | ||
| 390 | - | - | ||
| 279 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt






