Q3-osavuosiraportti
22 päivää sitten‧41 min
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
35 790
Myynti
Määrä
9 008
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 591 | - | - | ||
| 1 728 | - | - | ||
| 7 790 | - | - | ||
| 3 877 | - | - | ||
| 2 843 | - | - |
Ylin
1,788VWAP
Alin
1,76VaihtoMäärä
2,3 1 272 887
VWAP
Ylin
1,788Alin
1,76VaihtoMäärä
2,3 1 272 887
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 5.11. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 12.8. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 23.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 7.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 25.2. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·9 t sittenThere is no doubt that it wears on the average shareholder to hold shares in KOA, because when I look at the order book now, some are starting to get tired, or take profit already at 1.80. I wonder what their gain was when someone dumps out 100 - 300k shares at 1.80, because there is more than one seller 🤔 What their gain was, one must wonder, and what was an intended goal, because surely there can't be many who had 1.80 in mind when they bought, but nevertheless there are some sellers, and they influence each other by suddenly lowering the price a bit now and then. Monday there was big downward pressure, but the closing price wasn't completely crazy when the stock exchange closed. That day, much indicated that short sellers pressured and worked to keep the price down, but when the investor lists appeared and showed, if nothing else a tiny bit of the truth, the selling side that day was dominated by private individuals or small companies; not quite as expected. I once learned that 10 øre here and 10 øre there; that adds up to money, but I prefer "one krone here and one krone there", and for me with KOA, kroner pieces are probably closer to reality, unless one consciously goes for the ten-øre coin then🤔 I'm more inclined towards tens then, and the kroner pieces can come as dividends. I feel a bit excited thinking about the development I expect to experience with KOA 🥂 CMD 🎵 CMD 🎶 So far green and good, and I wish you a continued good day 🤝🤗
·9 t sittenI have placed a buy order now at 17K, so we'll see if the seller agrees to the price:)- ·9 t sittenIncreased a little today. I think we are in a trend.
·10 t sittenSoon, the 1.xxx price will be history. Those who sell now don't understand what they might miss out on. Next is CMD: Looking forward to it. Have increased my holdings in recent months as I have more faith in it now than before (been a shareholder for almost 6 years).
·12 t sittenCan DNB use multiple accounts to hide that they are trying to cover the short?
·11 t sittenPasted your question to chatgbt **Can DNB use multiple accounts that “hide” short covering? → Theoretical scenarios (from mild to more advanced)** 1. Prime broker structure – multiple client accounts behind one actor DNB (or another major bank) can act as a prime broker for funds and large investors. Theory: • The real shorters are behind it, but the trades are shown on different client accounts, not in DNB's name. • The system can automatically split positions between different funds, sub-accounts, and omnibus accounts. • Outwardly, it looks like “many players are buying/selling”, while in practice it can be one source reducing risk. This happens completely legally and is common in the market. ⸻ 2. Internal “intermediate accounts” in the bank – settlement, liquidity, hedge Banks have many technical accounts: • Hedge account • Market making account • Intraday trading account • Internal crossing account Theory: 👉 Short covering can be done via internal settlement accounts before it is made visible in the register. This allows the market to interpret it as “many small buyers” covering, even though it is technically one internal process. ⸻ 3. Dark pools / internal matching Large banks can match buyers and sellers internally, without it being directly visible in the order book. Theory: • DNB provides the short seller with shares via a dark pool to cover their position. • Outsiders believe no activity is occurring, but internal trading gradually covers the short positions. This is used in practice for large trades. ⸻ 4. Use of external intermediaries (other banks) Banks cooperate. Theory: • DNB can use Nordea, JP Morgan, UBS or Morgan Stanley as an “execution agent”. • Orders are split through algorithms (VWAP, TWAP) and reported under multiple names. • Covering occurs, but it doesn't look like it's a single actor. ⸻ 5. Securities lending masking short movement If DNB borrows shares from: • Pension funds • Index funds • Own lending portfolio …covering can look like regular trading, not short covering. Theory: 👉 The bank borrows shares via one account, covers the short on another, and sends them back via a third. From the outside, it is difficult to see the structure. ⸻ 6. Accounts in clients' names, but managed by the same asset manager A fund, brokerage firm or DNB Asset Management can have: • 20 different funds • 50 discretionary portfolios • 200 professional clients Theory: ➡️ These can trade coordinated through one algorithm. Result: It seems like many actors are covering the short – while it is actually one system doing the job. ⸻ 7. Algorithmic splitting of orders → many small “accounts” High-frequency and algorithmic trading automatically splits orders: • 1 order of 500,000 shares → split into 2,500 small orders of 200 units each → distributed through various venues/channels/accounts Theory: 👉 This can give the impression of “many small buyers catching a falling price”, while in reality it is one actor covering their position extremely cleverly. ⸻ 8. Clearing house (Euronext VPS / Euroclear) hides account structure If DNB uses a clearing house: • VPS only shows the nominee account • Underlying funds or banks are invisible Theory: ➡️ Short covering through a nominee account looks like “regular turnover”, not like a large actor panic-buying. ⸻ 9. Net shorting hidden by long hedges Big trick in the market: • Account A shorts • Account B buys the same amount long (hedge) • Account C uses derivatives (CFD/option) to balance Theory: 👉 Outwardly, it looks like “regular volume”, but in reality, these are coordinated transactions to cover a short. ⸻ 10. Trading via ETF arbitrage / market makers ETFs containing the stock can be used: • ETF creates buying pressure • Market maker must balance the position by buying the stock • This purchase can indirectly cover a short Theory: ➡️ Short covering is hidden behind “ETF balancing”. ⸻ Conclusion Yes – theoretically there are many mechanisms where DNB can use multiple accounts that make short covering “invisible” to ordinary investors. And many of these happen completely legally through: • Prime broking • Nominee accounts • Algorithmic order splitting • Clearing houses • Internal accounts • Dark pools
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q3-osavuosiraportti
22 päivää sitten‧41 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenThere is no doubt that it wears on the average shareholder to hold shares in KOA, because when I look at the order book now, some are starting to get tired, or take profit already at 1.80. I wonder what their gain was when someone dumps out 100 - 300k shares at 1.80, because there is more than one seller 🤔 What their gain was, one must wonder, and what was an intended goal, because surely there can't be many who had 1.80 in mind when they bought, but nevertheless there are some sellers, and they influence each other by suddenly lowering the price a bit now and then. Monday there was big downward pressure, but the closing price wasn't completely crazy when the stock exchange closed. That day, much indicated that short sellers pressured and worked to keep the price down, but when the investor lists appeared and showed, if nothing else a tiny bit of the truth, the selling side that day was dominated by private individuals or small companies; not quite as expected. I once learned that 10 øre here and 10 øre there; that adds up to money, but I prefer "one krone here and one krone there", and for me with KOA, kroner pieces are probably closer to reality, unless one consciously goes for the ten-øre coin then🤔 I'm more inclined towards tens then, and the kroner pieces can come as dividends. I feel a bit excited thinking about the development I expect to experience with KOA 🥂 CMD 🎵 CMD 🎶 So far green and good, and I wish you a continued good day 🤝🤗
- ·9 t sittenI have placed a buy order now at 17K, so we'll see if the seller agrees to the price:)
- ·9 t sittenIncreased a little today. I think we are in a trend.
- ·10 t sittenSoon, the 1.xxx price will be history. Those who sell now don't understand what they might miss out on. Next is CMD: Looking forward to it. Have increased my holdings in recent months as I have more faith in it now than before (been a shareholder for almost 6 years).
- ·12 t sittenCan DNB use multiple accounts to hide that they are trying to cover the short?·11 t sittenPasted your question to chatgbt **Can DNB use multiple accounts that “hide” short covering? → Theoretical scenarios (from mild to more advanced)** 1. Prime broker structure – multiple client accounts behind one actor DNB (or another major bank) can act as a prime broker for funds and large investors. Theory: • The real shorters are behind it, but the trades are shown on different client accounts, not in DNB's name. • The system can automatically split positions between different funds, sub-accounts, and omnibus accounts. • Outwardly, it looks like “many players are buying/selling”, while in practice it can be one source reducing risk. This happens completely legally and is common in the market. ⸻ 2. Internal “intermediate accounts” in the bank – settlement, liquidity, hedge Banks have many technical accounts: • Hedge account • Market making account • Intraday trading account • Internal crossing account Theory: 👉 Short covering can be done via internal settlement accounts before it is made visible in the register. This allows the market to interpret it as “many small buyers” covering, even though it is technically one internal process. ⸻ 3. Dark pools / internal matching Large banks can match buyers and sellers internally, without it being directly visible in the order book. Theory: • DNB provides the short seller with shares via a dark pool to cover their position. • Outsiders believe no activity is occurring, but internal trading gradually covers the short positions. This is used in practice for large trades. ⸻ 4. Use of external intermediaries (other banks) Banks cooperate. Theory: • DNB can use Nordea, JP Morgan, UBS or Morgan Stanley as an “execution agent”. • Orders are split through algorithms (VWAP, TWAP) and reported under multiple names. • Covering occurs, but it doesn't look like it's a single actor. ⸻ 5. Securities lending masking short movement If DNB borrows shares from: • Pension funds • Index funds • Own lending portfolio …covering can look like regular trading, not short covering. Theory: 👉 The bank borrows shares via one account, covers the short on another, and sends them back via a third. From the outside, it is difficult to see the structure. ⸻ 6. Accounts in clients' names, but managed by the same asset manager A fund, brokerage firm or DNB Asset Management can have: • 20 different funds • 50 discretionary portfolios • 200 professional clients Theory: ➡️ These can trade coordinated through one algorithm. Result: It seems like many actors are covering the short – while it is actually one system doing the job. ⸻ 7. Algorithmic splitting of orders → many small “accounts” High-frequency and algorithmic trading automatically splits orders: • 1 order of 500,000 shares → split into 2,500 small orders of 200 units each → distributed through various venues/channels/accounts Theory: 👉 This can give the impression of “many small buyers catching a falling price”, while in reality it is one actor covering their position extremely cleverly. ⸻ 8. Clearing house (Euronext VPS / Euroclear) hides account structure If DNB uses a clearing house: • VPS only shows the nominee account • Underlying funds or banks are invisible Theory: ➡️ Short covering through a nominee account looks like “regular turnover”, not like a large actor panic-buying. ⸻ 9. Net shorting hidden by long hedges Big trick in the market: • Account A shorts • Account B buys the same amount long (hedge) • Account C uses derivatives (CFD/option) to balance Theory: 👉 Outwardly, it looks like “regular volume”, but in reality, these are coordinated transactions to cover a short. ⸻ 10. Trading via ETF arbitrage / market makers ETFs containing the stock can be used: • ETF creates buying pressure • Market maker must balance the position by buying the stock • This purchase can indirectly cover a short Theory: ➡️ Short covering is hidden behind “ETF balancing”. ⸻ Conclusion Yes – theoretically there are many mechanisms where DNB can use multiple accounts that make short covering “invisible” to ordinary investors. And many of these happen completely legally through: • Prime broking • Nominee accounts • Algorithmic order splitting • Clearing houses • Internal accounts • Dark pools
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
35 790
Myynti
Määrä
9 008
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 591 | - | - | ||
| 1 728 | - | - | ||
| 7 790 | - | - | ||
| 3 877 | - | - | ||
| 2 843 | - | - |
Ylin
1,788VWAP
Alin
1,76VaihtoMäärä
2,3 1 272 887
VWAP
Ylin
1,788Alin
1,76VaihtoMäärä
2,3 1 272 887
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 5.11. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 12.8. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 23.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 7.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 25.2. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Q3-osavuosiraportti
22 päivää sitten‧41 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 5.11. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 12.8. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 23.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 7.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 25.2. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenThere is no doubt that it wears on the average shareholder to hold shares in KOA, because when I look at the order book now, some are starting to get tired, or take profit already at 1.80. I wonder what their gain was when someone dumps out 100 - 300k shares at 1.80, because there is more than one seller 🤔 What their gain was, one must wonder, and what was an intended goal, because surely there can't be many who had 1.80 in mind when they bought, but nevertheless there are some sellers, and they influence each other by suddenly lowering the price a bit now and then. Monday there was big downward pressure, but the closing price wasn't completely crazy when the stock exchange closed. That day, much indicated that short sellers pressured and worked to keep the price down, but when the investor lists appeared and showed, if nothing else a tiny bit of the truth, the selling side that day was dominated by private individuals or small companies; not quite as expected. I once learned that 10 øre here and 10 øre there; that adds up to money, but I prefer "one krone here and one krone there", and for me with KOA, kroner pieces are probably closer to reality, unless one consciously goes for the ten-øre coin then🤔 I'm more inclined towards tens then, and the kroner pieces can come as dividends. I feel a bit excited thinking about the development I expect to experience with KOA 🥂 CMD 🎵 CMD 🎶 So far green and good, and I wish you a continued good day 🤝🤗
- ·9 t sittenI have placed a buy order now at 17K, so we'll see if the seller agrees to the price:)
- ·9 t sittenIncreased a little today. I think we are in a trend.
- ·10 t sittenSoon, the 1.xxx price will be history. Those who sell now don't understand what they might miss out on. Next is CMD: Looking forward to it. Have increased my holdings in recent months as I have more faith in it now than before (been a shareholder for almost 6 years).
- ·12 t sittenCan DNB use multiple accounts to hide that they are trying to cover the short?·11 t sittenPasted your question to chatgbt **Can DNB use multiple accounts that “hide” short covering? → Theoretical scenarios (from mild to more advanced)** 1. Prime broker structure – multiple client accounts behind one actor DNB (or another major bank) can act as a prime broker for funds and large investors. Theory: • The real shorters are behind it, but the trades are shown on different client accounts, not in DNB's name. • The system can automatically split positions between different funds, sub-accounts, and omnibus accounts. • Outwardly, it looks like “many players are buying/selling”, while in practice it can be one source reducing risk. This happens completely legally and is common in the market. ⸻ 2. Internal “intermediate accounts” in the bank – settlement, liquidity, hedge Banks have many technical accounts: • Hedge account • Market making account • Intraday trading account • Internal crossing account Theory: 👉 Short covering can be done via internal settlement accounts before it is made visible in the register. This allows the market to interpret it as “many small buyers” covering, even though it is technically one internal process. ⸻ 3. Dark pools / internal matching Large banks can match buyers and sellers internally, without it being directly visible in the order book. Theory: • DNB provides the short seller with shares via a dark pool to cover their position. • Outsiders believe no activity is occurring, but internal trading gradually covers the short positions. This is used in practice for large trades. ⸻ 4. Use of external intermediaries (other banks) Banks cooperate. Theory: • DNB can use Nordea, JP Morgan, UBS or Morgan Stanley as an “execution agent”. • Orders are split through algorithms (VWAP, TWAP) and reported under multiple names. • Covering occurs, but it doesn't look like it's a single actor. ⸻ 5. Securities lending masking short movement If DNB borrows shares from: • Pension funds • Index funds • Own lending portfolio …covering can look like regular trading, not short covering. Theory: 👉 The bank borrows shares via one account, covers the short on another, and sends them back via a third. From the outside, it is difficult to see the structure. ⸻ 6. Accounts in clients' names, but managed by the same asset manager A fund, brokerage firm or DNB Asset Management can have: • 20 different funds • 50 discretionary portfolios • 200 professional clients Theory: ➡️ These can trade coordinated through one algorithm. Result: It seems like many actors are covering the short – while it is actually one system doing the job. ⸻ 7. Algorithmic splitting of orders → many small “accounts” High-frequency and algorithmic trading automatically splits orders: • 1 order of 500,000 shares → split into 2,500 small orders of 200 units each → distributed through various venues/channels/accounts Theory: 👉 This can give the impression of “many small buyers catching a falling price”, while in reality it is one actor covering their position extremely cleverly. ⸻ 8. Clearing house (Euronext VPS / Euroclear) hides account structure If DNB uses a clearing house: • VPS only shows the nominee account • Underlying funds or banks are invisible Theory: ➡️ Short covering through a nominee account looks like “regular turnover”, not like a large actor panic-buying. ⸻ 9. Net shorting hidden by long hedges Big trick in the market: • Account A shorts • Account B buys the same amount long (hedge) • Account C uses derivatives (CFD/option) to balance Theory: 👉 Outwardly, it looks like “regular volume”, but in reality, these are coordinated transactions to cover a short. ⸻ 10. Trading via ETF arbitrage / market makers ETFs containing the stock can be used: • ETF creates buying pressure • Market maker must balance the position by buying the stock • This purchase can indirectly cover a short Theory: ➡️ Short covering is hidden behind “ETF balancing”. ⸻ Conclusion Yes – theoretically there are many mechanisms where DNB can use multiple accounts that make short covering “invisible” to ordinary investors. And many of these happen completely legally through: • Prime broking • Nominee accounts • Algorithmic order splitting • Clearing houses • Internal accounts • Dark pools
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
35 790
Myynti
Määrä
9 008
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 591 | - | - | ||
| 1 728 | - | - | ||
| 7 790 | - | - | ||
| 3 877 | - | - | ||
| 2 843 | - | - |
Ylin
1,788VWAP
Alin
1,76VaihtoMäärä
2,3 1 272 887
VWAP
Ylin
1,788Alin
1,76VaihtoMäärä
2,3 1 272 887
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt