2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
35 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 7 500 | - | - | ||
| 7 499 | - | - | ||
| 12 109 | - | - | ||
| 486 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenIt may seem that some on this forum are of the opinion that this is a rocket stock, it definitely is not. If the first quarter had been good, insider buying would have abounded, in my opinion this is still a stock to put in the drawer for 3 to .5 years. The communication to us owners is, to say the least, a total fiasco, they could have informed about contracts and not least informed that the entire eventual profit in 2026 will be paid out as a dividend, they have cash flow good enough for that. After having worked 30 years in this industry, my opinion is that they should soon have adults at home, good top management but unsure if the rest are good enough for the first team.
·12 t sittenRead this again: Posting this from @carrlo - so everyone sees: KOA has been in a truly extraordinary situation where a hedge fund almost succeeded in taking KOA private. The cost structure was, to put it mildly, out of balance; 26% of salary costs went to administration in an industrial company. It goes without saying that this was not a sustainable situation. It paints a skewed picture to use this period as a reference for “normal” value creation. What is more relevant to look at is what has actually happened since we got the good old management back: KOA has long-term relationships with leading OEMs, and the company itself has stated that they have not lost a single contract through a very demanding period. That in itself is a quality stamp. KOA has delivered the best cash flow in four years, despite lower revenue. In other words, better operational control. In addition, parts of the cash flow are still not visible, due to expenses related to customs duties that will be reimbursed. Operations are positive, and liquidity is under control, which was far from a given a few years ago. KOA has increased its focus on motion control, electrification, and energy-efficient technology. This is technology that is directly exposed to the vehicles of the future. A concrete example is that Volvo now has a demo car with steer-by-wire from Chassis Autonomy. Not everything is “solved” – but there is actually a real turnaround underway. Regarding the alternative of sale/structural changes: yes, it is always a possibility, and the board should, of course, continuously consider this. But a sale at today's level could also mean realizing values before the improvements in operations and technology portfolio actually materialize in the market. Perhaps it's better to let the turnaround have time to impact margins and valuation. KOA today is something completely different from what it was just a few years ago.
·1 päivä sittenThe sharply rising American stock futures indicate there's a de-escalation coming in Iran, I think.. That can provide good tailwind leading up to the next earnings report, where we can expect KA to reconfirm the direction set in December, positively…
·1 päivä sitten0,002 øre UP and 0,1% on a new record day on Osebx............If positive things are to be sought here, it must be that the stock, purely technically, is still established at the very bottom of a medium-term upward trend channel......and should there be any positive news/messages from the company, it's not a long way up to the 2,0-2,10 level which gives more robust technical signals.- ·1 päivä sittenPosting this from @carrlo - so everyone can see: KOA has been in a truly extraordinary situation where a hedge fund almost succeeded in taking KOA off the stock exchange. The cost structure was, to put it mildly, out of balance; 26% of salary costs went to administration in an industrial company. It goes without saying that this was not a sustainable situation. It gives a skewed picture to use this period as a reference for “normal” value creation. What is more relevant to look at is what has actually happened after we got the good old ones back in management: KOA has long-term relationships with leading OEMs, and the company itself has stated that they have not lost a single contract through a very demanding period. That in itself is a mark of quality. KOA has delivered the best cash flow in four years, despite lower revenue. In other words, better operational control. In addition, parts of the cash flow are still not visible, due to expenses related to customs duties that will be reimbursed. Operations are positive, and liquidity is under control, which was far from a given a few years ago. KOA has increased its focus on motion control, electrification, and energy-efficient technology. This is technology that is directly exposed to the vehicles of the future. A concrete example is that Volvo now has a demo car with steer-by-wire from Chassis Autonomy. Everything is not “solved” – but there is actually a real turnaround underway. Regarding the alternative of sales/structural changes: yes, it is always a possibility, and the board should, of course, continuously consider this. But a sale at today's level could also mean realizing values before the improvements in operations and the technology portfolio actually materialize in the market. Perhaps it's better to let the turnaround have time to manifest in margins and valuation. KOA today is something completely different from what it was just a few years ago.
- ·1 päivä sittenNew quarter ended and it can be "interesting" to look at the "return" in KOA over the last 5 years (will not go further back as it does not give a better impression cf. above). But if we consider the last 5-year period where the company has changed CEO 3 times (!), where all new ones have been praised for their competence before the next one arrived, where the person in question is supposed to be of a different caliber than the previous one........what has the company actually achieved....? "Return" over the last 5 years is approx - 31 %......Osebx is up + 90% in the same period! That is a differential return of approx 120 %.....to put this a bit into perspective. If one adds lost alternative return for the invested amount in the period, the numbers do not get better........ It is not very impressive.... in a period where the company itself has consistently marketed itself on its website with creating shareholder value "Create shareholder value". That would have been a libelous claim in most other contexts. It is simply quite incredible. The stock exchange has in the same period set new record highs between 80-90 times just since 2024, where the stock exchange has had its best period in modern times (2024-2026). So when will KOA actually deliver returns? I am now aware that the last year in isolation does not look too bad for Fiskum, who came in at a bottom level for the share.....but significant improvements are needed in future returns for there to be stable shareholder returns. The question is, from a shareholder perspective, whether KOA`s shareholders can to a much greater extent realize values beyond today's share price by a sale of all/parts of the company and/or a merger with other companies in the same industry. Should we wait for years for the company to be turned around and with all possible uncertainties that are constantly highlighted by the company itself (there is apparently more of this in KOA than in all other companies....) and continue this desert wandering? A sale of the company today will and should be able to provide a premium of at least 40 % on today's price, and that means a share price level of 2,75 >3,00 per share should be achievable. It is a good distance from what most believe the company should be worth, but one sees daily that the company is unable to bring forth shareholder values through ongoing stock exchange listing. The company falls when the market rises and falls much more than the market when it falls. This has been the essence throughout this 5-year period. I now expect the board to take action and actually address alternative strategies so that shareholders actually get something back for years of negative returns. There is - even in KOA - a limit to how long one can continue to talk about shareholder values without delivering anything close to this?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
35 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenIt may seem that some on this forum are of the opinion that this is a rocket stock, it definitely is not. If the first quarter had been good, insider buying would have abounded, in my opinion this is still a stock to put in the drawer for 3 to .5 years. The communication to us owners is, to say the least, a total fiasco, they could have informed about contracts and not least informed that the entire eventual profit in 2026 will be paid out as a dividend, they have cash flow good enough for that. After having worked 30 years in this industry, my opinion is that they should soon have adults at home, good top management but unsure if the rest are good enough for the first team.·12 t sittenRead this again: Posting this from @carrlo - so everyone sees: KOA has been in a truly extraordinary situation where a hedge fund almost succeeded in taking KOA private. The cost structure was, to put it mildly, out of balance; 26% of salary costs went to administration in an industrial company. It goes without saying that this was not a sustainable situation. It paints a skewed picture to use this period as a reference for “normal” value creation. What is more relevant to look at is what has actually happened since we got the good old management back: KOA has long-term relationships with leading OEMs, and the company itself has stated that they have not lost a single contract through a very demanding period. That in itself is a quality stamp. KOA has delivered the best cash flow in four years, despite lower revenue. In other words, better operational control. In addition, parts of the cash flow are still not visible, due to expenses related to customs duties that will be reimbursed. Operations are positive, and liquidity is under control, which was far from a given a few years ago. KOA has increased its focus on motion control, electrification, and energy-efficient technology. This is technology that is directly exposed to the vehicles of the future. A concrete example is that Volvo now has a demo car with steer-by-wire from Chassis Autonomy. Not everything is “solved” – but there is actually a real turnaround underway. Regarding the alternative of sale/structural changes: yes, it is always a possibility, and the board should, of course, continuously consider this. But a sale at today's level could also mean realizing values before the improvements in operations and technology portfolio actually materialize in the market. Perhaps it's better to let the turnaround have time to impact margins and valuation. KOA today is something completely different from what it was just a few years ago.
- ·1 päivä sittenThe sharply rising American stock futures indicate there's a de-escalation coming in Iran, I think.. That can provide good tailwind leading up to the next earnings report, where we can expect KA to reconfirm the direction set in December, positively…
- ·1 päivä sitten0,002 øre UP and 0,1% on a new record day on Osebx............If positive things are to be sought here, it must be that the stock, purely technically, is still established at the very bottom of a medium-term upward trend channel......and should there be any positive news/messages from the company, it's not a long way up to the 2,0-2,10 level which gives more robust technical signals.
- ·1 päivä sittenPosting this from @carrlo - so everyone can see: KOA has been in a truly extraordinary situation where a hedge fund almost succeeded in taking KOA off the stock exchange. The cost structure was, to put it mildly, out of balance; 26% of salary costs went to administration in an industrial company. It goes without saying that this was not a sustainable situation. It gives a skewed picture to use this period as a reference for “normal” value creation. What is more relevant to look at is what has actually happened after we got the good old ones back in management: KOA has long-term relationships with leading OEMs, and the company itself has stated that they have not lost a single contract through a very demanding period. That in itself is a mark of quality. KOA has delivered the best cash flow in four years, despite lower revenue. In other words, better operational control. In addition, parts of the cash flow are still not visible, due to expenses related to customs duties that will be reimbursed. Operations are positive, and liquidity is under control, which was far from a given a few years ago. KOA has increased its focus on motion control, electrification, and energy-efficient technology. This is technology that is directly exposed to the vehicles of the future. A concrete example is that Volvo now has a demo car with steer-by-wire from Chassis Autonomy. Everything is not “solved” – but there is actually a real turnaround underway. Regarding the alternative of sales/structural changes: yes, it is always a possibility, and the board should, of course, continuously consider this. But a sale at today's level could also mean realizing values before the improvements in operations and the technology portfolio actually materialize in the market. Perhaps it's better to let the turnaround have time to manifest in margins and valuation. KOA today is something completely different from what it was just a few years ago.
- ·1 päivä sittenNew quarter ended and it can be "interesting" to look at the "return" in KOA over the last 5 years (will not go further back as it does not give a better impression cf. above). But if we consider the last 5-year period where the company has changed CEO 3 times (!), where all new ones have been praised for their competence before the next one arrived, where the person in question is supposed to be of a different caliber than the previous one........what has the company actually achieved....? "Return" over the last 5 years is approx - 31 %......Osebx is up + 90% in the same period! That is a differential return of approx 120 %.....to put this a bit into perspective. If one adds lost alternative return for the invested amount in the period, the numbers do not get better........ It is not very impressive.... in a period where the company itself has consistently marketed itself on its website with creating shareholder value "Create shareholder value". That would have been a libelous claim in most other contexts. It is simply quite incredible. The stock exchange has in the same period set new record highs between 80-90 times just since 2024, where the stock exchange has had its best period in modern times (2024-2026). So when will KOA actually deliver returns? I am now aware that the last year in isolation does not look too bad for Fiskum, who came in at a bottom level for the share.....but significant improvements are needed in future returns for there to be stable shareholder returns. The question is, from a shareholder perspective, whether KOA`s shareholders can to a much greater extent realize values beyond today's share price by a sale of all/parts of the company and/or a merger with other companies in the same industry. Should we wait for years for the company to be turned around and with all possible uncertainties that are constantly highlighted by the company itself (there is apparently more of this in KOA than in all other companies....) and continue this desert wandering? A sale of the company today will and should be able to provide a premium of at least 40 % on today's price, and that means a share price level of 2,75 >3,00 per share should be achievable. It is a good distance from what most believe the company should be worth, but one sees daily that the company is unable to bring forth shareholder values through ongoing stock exchange listing. The company falls when the market rises and falls much more than the market when it falls. This has been the essence throughout this 5-year period. I now expect the board to take action and actually address alternative strategies so that shareholders actually get something back for years of negative returns. There is - even in KOA - a limit to how long one can continue to talk about shareholder values without delivering anything close to this?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 7 500 | - | - | ||
| 7 499 | - | - | ||
| 12 109 | - | - | ||
| 486 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
35 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 7.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenIt may seem that some on this forum are of the opinion that this is a rocket stock, it definitely is not. If the first quarter had been good, insider buying would have abounded, in my opinion this is still a stock to put in the drawer for 3 to .5 years. The communication to us owners is, to say the least, a total fiasco, they could have informed about contracts and not least informed that the entire eventual profit in 2026 will be paid out as a dividend, they have cash flow good enough for that. After having worked 30 years in this industry, my opinion is that they should soon have adults at home, good top management but unsure if the rest are good enough for the first team.·12 t sittenRead this again: Posting this from @carrlo - so everyone sees: KOA has been in a truly extraordinary situation where a hedge fund almost succeeded in taking KOA private. The cost structure was, to put it mildly, out of balance; 26% of salary costs went to administration in an industrial company. It goes without saying that this was not a sustainable situation. It paints a skewed picture to use this period as a reference for “normal” value creation. What is more relevant to look at is what has actually happened since we got the good old management back: KOA has long-term relationships with leading OEMs, and the company itself has stated that they have not lost a single contract through a very demanding period. That in itself is a quality stamp. KOA has delivered the best cash flow in four years, despite lower revenue. In other words, better operational control. In addition, parts of the cash flow are still not visible, due to expenses related to customs duties that will be reimbursed. Operations are positive, and liquidity is under control, which was far from a given a few years ago. KOA has increased its focus on motion control, electrification, and energy-efficient technology. This is technology that is directly exposed to the vehicles of the future. A concrete example is that Volvo now has a demo car with steer-by-wire from Chassis Autonomy. Not everything is “solved” – but there is actually a real turnaround underway. Regarding the alternative of sale/structural changes: yes, it is always a possibility, and the board should, of course, continuously consider this. But a sale at today's level could also mean realizing values before the improvements in operations and technology portfolio actually materialize in the market. Perhaps it's better to let the turnaround have time to impact margins and valuation. KOA today is something completely different from what it was just a few years ago.
- ·1 päivä sittenThe sharply rising American stock futures indicate there's a de-escalation coming in Iran, I think.. That can provide good tailwind leading up to the next earnings report, where we can expect KA to reconfirm the direction set in December, positively…
- ·1 päivä sitten0,002 øre UP and 0,1% on a new record day on Osebx............If positive things are to be sought here, it must be that the stock, purely technically, is still established at the very bottom of a medium-term upward trend channel......and should there be any positive news/messages from the company, it's not a long way up to the 2,0-2,10 level which gives more robust technical signals.
- ·1 päivä sittenPosting this from @carrlo - so everyone can see: KOA has been in a truly extraordinary situation where a hedge fund almost succeeded in taking KOA off the stock exchange. The cost structure was, to put it mildly, out of balance; 26% of salary costs went to administration in an industrial company. It goes without saying that this was not a sustainable situation. It gives a skewed picture to use this period as a reference for “normal” value creation. What is more relevant to look at is what has actually happened after we got the good old ones back in management: KOA has long-term relationships with leading OEMs, and the company itself has stated that they have not lost a single contract through a very demanding period. That in itself is a mark of quality. KOA has delivered the best cash flow in four years, despite lower revenue. In other words, better operational control. In addition, parts of the cash flow are still not visible, due to expenses related to customs duties that will be reimbursed. Operations are positive, and liquidity is under control, which was far from a given a few years ago. KOA has increased its focus on motion control, electrification, and energy-efficient technology. This is technology that is directly exposed to the vehicles of the future. A concrete example is that Volvo now has a demo car with steer-by-wire from Chassis Autonomy. Everything is not “solved” – but there is actually a real turnaround underway. Regarding the alternative of sales/structural changes: yes, it is always a possibility, and the board should, of course, continuously consider this. But a sale at today's level could also mean realizing values before the improvements in operations and the technology portfolio actually materialize in the market. Perhaps it's better to let the turnaround have time to manifest in margins and valuation. KOA today is something completely different from what it was just a few years ago.
- ·1 päivä sittenNew quarter ended and it can be "interesting" to look at the "return" in KOA over the last 5 years (will not go further back as it does not give a better impression cf. above). But if we consider the last 5-year period where the company has changed CEO 3 times (!), where all new ones have been praised for their competence before the next one arrived, where the person in question is supposed to be of a different caliber than the previous one........what has the company actually achieved....? "Return" over the last 5 years is approx - 31 %......Osebx is up + 90% in the same period! That is a differential return of approx 120 %.....to put this a bit into perspective. If one adds lost alternative return for the invested amount in the period, the numbers do not get better........ It is not very impressive.... in a period where the company itself has consistently marketed itself on its website with creating shareholder value "Create shareholder value". That would have been a libelous claim in most other contexts. It is simply quite incredible. The stock exchange has in the same period set new record highs between 80-90 times just since 2024, where the stock exchange has had its best period in modern times (2024-2026). So when will KOA actually deliver returns? I am now aware that the last year in isolation does not look too bad for Fiskum, who came in at a bottom level for the share.....but significant improvements are needed in future returns for there to be stable shareholder returns. The question is, from a shareholder perspective, whether KOA`s shareholders can to a much greater extent realize values beyond today's share price by a sale of all/parts of the company and/or a merger with other companies in the same industry. Should we wait for years for the company to be turned around and with all possible uncertainties that are constantly highlighted by the company itself (there is apparently more of this in KOA than in all other companies....) and continue this desert wandering? A sale of the company today will and should be able to provide a premium of at least 40 % on today's price, and that means a share price level of 2,75 >3,00 per share should be achievable. It is a good distance from what most believe the company should be worth, but one sees daily that the company is unable to bring forth shareholder values through ongoing stock exchange listing. The company falls when the market rises and falls much more than the market when it falls. This has been the essence throughout this 5-year period. I now expect the board to take action and actually address alternative strategies so that shareholders actually get something back for years of negative returns. There is - even in KOA - a limit to how long one can continue to talk about shareholder values without delivering anything close to this?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 7 500 | - | - | ||
| 7 499 | - | - | ||
| 12 109 | - | - | ||
| 486 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt