2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
82 päivää sitten
‧27 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | - | - | ||
| 100 | - | - | ||
| 100 | - | - | ||
| 825 | - | - | ||
| 3 245 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 22.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 16.7. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 30.4. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 12.8.2025 |
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·2 t sitten · MuokattuWhat do you know about the company 🤔 We are soon under 20.000 shareholders in KOA. In November 2021 we were 32.500 and yes, I understand that many have given up along the way from there, because back then there was corona and a completely different goal for the company that formed the basis of the activity. If one is to talk about a shift, it must be from when the shareholder revolt took place and a year or so forward where a lot tipped and the shareholders had to evaluate the company against the numbers. Most saw the numbers and not the company and the drop in shareholders continued, and was large. The last two years were a fight for credibility and to rebuild trust, but the numbers still spoke stronger than the company and the shareholders continued to flee. The last year the company's turnaround and cleanup has really shown results and we see results that we have to go far back in time to find corresponding ones, even though revenue has decreased significantly. Dataset numbers still speak, and even though the trend is incredibly positive and the numbers can easily be calculated to a potential dividend for the year, the trend is still that shareholders are selling out. The numbers and money rule and what people know about the company becomes almost unbelievable reading in certain posts, which are clearly written in frustration on the forum. If someone has bet 10.000 kr with the goal of a 5-10 % gain I understand them well when we see periods of the price development, but then they have bet on the price and not the company, which they know very little about. A strange post from me this, but found this article in the morning and thought to myself that this is a variant of KOA, in the article for those who thought and believed to invest in a green company, (here in KOA only the share price and bottom fishing) and know more or nothing about the company, for KOA, just something with cars (lies in the name), for Equinor, something with oil and gas, and a green shift. 🤔 https://www.nrk.no/artikkel/fasiten-om-oljegiganten-far-folk-til-a-mape-hva-tipper-du-1527152
Good point. Probably very many who know little about companies they have shares in. I myself have a few companies that I look into, e.g. KA. Some sectors I bet on, e.g. savings banks. And 1 % deep-sea fishing which is as much gambling as investment.
·17 t sittenExciting development, the share price is STABLE and the number of shareholders is going down 🥳🥳🥳
·3 päivää sittenThe sales side is in the plus. This despite positive signals from the company. Why one is interested in a sale is hard to understand. This results in many shareholders getting caught up in the frustrating drag....
·1.10.A somewhat interesting contrast regarding KOA's Steer-by-Wire.. If I remember correctly- At the Capital Markets Day in December 2025, CEO Trond Fiskum stated that there was still "quite some development" left before a complete system could go into series production, and that 3–4 years was a realistic time horizon for SOP – meaning around 2029–2030ish. Today, KOA describes the SBW solution as ready for series production. That is quite a big development in under a year.🤔 Of course, there might be a difference between the RWA product itself being production-ready and a complete OEM-integrated system being ready for SOP. But then I think a natural question is: Has the market received sufficient information about what has actually happened with the SBW development since December 2025? Has KOA significantly accelerated the development, or are we now talking about two different milestones? It would be interesting to get this clearly explained by the company.
An easy-to-understand review using AI about this, and must therefore be taken for what it is: What you are pointing out is a classic distinction in the automotive industry between how ready the supplier is versus when a car project actually rolls off the factory floor. 1. "Ready for series production" (The product's technological maturity): When KOA/Chassis Autonomy states that the RWA solution is "ready for series production", it means that the design, architecture, safety features (fail-operational) and component-level testing are fully developed and validated. The product is industrially ready to be built on a production line and meets the requirements for mass production. 2. SOP (Start of Production) in 2029–2030 (The customer's integration cycle): Even though KOA has its product "ready", the automotive industry requires long integration runs: A car manufacturer (OEM) must first select KOA as a supplier (contract award / Nomination). The system must be adapted to the specific car model (chassis, software, crash tests and functional safety). The car manufacturer must conduct several years of winter testing, endurance testing and certification of the entire vehicle. Conclusion regarding the communication It is primarily about two different milestones: Technological/Product milestone: The product has gone from being a prototype/concept under development at Chassis Autonomy to becoming a fully industrialized, production-ready product in KOA's portfolio. Commercial SOP milestone: The timeline of 3–4 years (approx. 2029–2030) that Trond Fiskum mentioned applies to the actual start-up phase for volume delivery to specific car models, as the OEMs' own car platforms require this lead time before series production starts in the car factories.
·1.10.Time for a reverse stock split of e.g. 1 for 10 so we can get rid of this 0.001 øre penny stock triplet. They should also hire a media advisor before this stock gets hidden away in a pitch-black cellar. If I mention to anyone that I own shares in KOA, very few have a clue who they are and what they do.As a point of interest here, it can be mentioned that KOA in 2020 and early 2021 was one of the favorites among retail investors, and was often found among the five most traded shares on the Oslo Stock Exchange.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
82 päivää sitten
‧27 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·2 t sitten · MuokattuWhat do you know about the company 🤔 We are soon under 20.000 shareholders in KOA. In November 2021 we were 32.500 and yes, I understand that many have given up along the way from there, because back then there was corona and a completely different goal for the company that formed the basis of the activity. If one is to talk about a shift, it must be from when the shareholder revolt took place and a year or so forward where a lot tipped and the shareholders had to evaluate the company against the numbers. Most saw the numbers and not the company and the drop in shareholders continued, and was large. The last two years were a fight for credibility and to rebuild trust, but the numbers still spoke stronger than the company and the shareholders continued to flee. The last year the company's turnaround and cleanup has really shown results and we see results that we have to go far back in time to find corresponding ones, even though revenue has decreased significantly. Dataset numbers still speak, and even though the trend is incredibly positive and the numbers can easily be calculated to a potential dividend for the year, the trend is still that shareholders are selling out. The numbers and money rule and what people know about the company becomes almost unbelievable reading in certain posts, which are clearly written in frustration on the forum. If someone has bet 10.000 kr with the goal of a 5-10 % gain I understand them well when we see periods of the price development, but then they have bet on the price and not the company, which they know very little about. A strange post from me this, but found this article in the morning and thought to myself that this is a variant of KOA, in the article for those who thought and believed to invest in a green company, (here in KOA only the share price and bottom fishing) and know more or nothing about the company, for KOA, just something with cars (lies in the name), for Equinor, something with oil and gas, and a green shift. 🤔 https://www.nrk.no/artikkel/fasiten-om-oljegiganten-far-folk-til-a-mape-hva-tipper-du-1527152Good point. Probably very many who know little about companies they have shares in. I myself have a few companies that I look into, e.g. KA. Some sectors I bet on, e.g. savings banks. And 1 % deep-sea fishing which is as much gambling as investment.
- ·17 t sittenExciting development, the share price is STABLE and the number of shareholders is going down 🥳🥳🥳
- ·3 päivää sittenThe sales side is in the plus. This despite positive signals from the company. Why one is interested in a sale is hard to understand. This results in many shareholders getting caught up in the frustrating drag....
- ·1.10.A somewhat interesting contrast regarding KOA's Steer-by-Wire.. If I remember correctly- At the Capital Markets Day in December 2025, CEO Trond Fiskum stated that there was still "quite some development" left before a complete system could go into series production, and that 3–4 years was a realistic time horizon for SOP – meaning around 2029–2030ish. Today, KOA describes the SBW solution as ready for series production. That is quite a big development in under a year.🤔 Of course, there might be a difference between the RWA product itself being production-ready and a complete OEM-integrated system being ready for SOP. But then I think a natural question is: Has the market received sufficient information about what has actually happened with the SBW development since December 2025? Has KOA significantly accelerated the development, or are we now talking about two different milestones? It would be interesting to get this clearly explained by the company.An easy-to-understand review using AI about this, and must therefore be taken for what it is: What you are pointing out is a classic distinction in the automotive industry between how ready the supplier is versus when a car project actually rolls off the factory floor. 1. "Ready for series production" (The product's technological maturity): When KOA/Chassis Autonomy states that the RWA solution is "ready for series production", it means that the design, architecture, safety features (fail-operational) and component-level testing are fully developed and validated. The product is industrially ready to be built on a production line and meets the requirements for mass production. 2. SOP (Start of Production) in 2029–2030 (The customer's integration cycle): Even though KOA has its product "ready", the automotive industry requires long integration runs: A car manufacturer (OEM) must first select KOA as a supplier (contract award / Nomination). The system must be adapted to the specific car model (chassis, software, crash tests and functional safety). The car manufacturer must conduct several years of winter testing, endurance testing and certification of the entire vehicle. Conclusion regarding the communication It is primarily about two different milestones: Technological/Product milestone: The product has gone from being a prototype/concept under development at Chassis Autonomy to becoming a fully industrialized, production-ready product in KOA's portfolio. Commercial SOP milestone: The timeline of 3–4 years (approx. 2029–2030) that Trond Fiskum mentioned applies to the actual start-up phase for volume delivery to specific car models, as the OEMs' own car platforms require this lead time before series production starts in the car factories.
- ·1.10.Time for a reverse stock split of e.g. 1 for 10 so we can get rid of this 0.001 øre penny stock triplet. They should also hire a media advisor before this stock gets hidden away in a pitch-black cellar. If I mention to anyone that I own shares in KOA, very few have a clue who they are and what they do.As a point of interest here, it can be mentioned that KOA in 2020 and early 2021 was one of the favorites among retail investors, and was often found among the five most traded shares on the Oslo Stock Exchange.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | - | - | ||
| 100 | - | - | ||
| 100 | - | - | ||
| 825 | - | - | ||
| 3 245 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 22.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 16.7. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 30.4. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 12.8.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
82 päivää sitten
‧27 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 22.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 16.7. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 30.4. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 5.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 12.8.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·2 t sitten · MuokattuWhat do you know about the company 🤔 We are soon under 20.000 shareholders in KOA. In November 2021 we were 32.500 and yes, I understand that many have given up along the way from there, because back then there was corona and a completely different goal for the company that formed the basis of the activity. If one is to talk about a shift, it must be from when the shareholder revolt took place and a year or so forward where a lot tipped and the shareholders had to evaluate the company against the numbers. Most saw the numbers and not the company and the drop in shareholders continued, and was large. The last two years were a fight for credibility and to rebuild trust, but the numbers still spoke stronger than the company and the shareholders continued to flee. The last year the company's turnaround and cleanup has really shown results and we see results that we have to go far back in time to find corresponding ones, even though revenue has decreased significantly. Dataset numbers still speak, and even though the trend is incredibly positive and the numbers can easily be calculated to a potential dividend for the year, the trend is still that shareholders are selling out. The numbers and money rule and what people know about the company becomes almost unbelievable reading in certain posts, which are clearly written in frustration on the forum. If someone has bet 10.000 kr with the goal of a 5-10 % gain I understand them well when we see periods of the price development, but then they have bet on the price and not the company, which they know very little about. A strange post from me this, but found this article in the morning and thought to myself that this is a variant of KOA, in the article for those who thought and believed to invest in a green company, (here in KOA only the share price and bottom fishing) and know more or nothing about the company, for KOA, just something with cars (lies in the name), for Equinor, something with oil and gas, and a green shift. 🤔 https://www.nrk.no/artikkel/fasiten-om-oljegiganten-far-folk-til-a-mape-hva-tipper-du-1527152Good point. Probably very many who know little about companies they have shares in. I myself have a few companies that I look into, e.g. KA. Some sectors I bet on, e.g. savings banks. And 1 % deep-sea fishing which is as much gambling as investment.
- ·17 t sittenExciting development, the share price is STABLE and the number of shareholders is going down 🥳🥳🥳
- ·3 päivää sittenThe sales side is in the plus. This despite positive signals from the company. Why one is interested in a sale is hard to understand. This results in many shareholders getting caught up in the frustrating drag....
- ·1.10.A somewhat interesting contrast regarding KOA's Steer-by-Wire.. If I remember correctly- At the Capital Markets Day in December 2025, CEO Trond Fiskum stated that there was still "quite some development" left before a complete system could go into series production, and that 3–4 years was a realistic time horizon for SOP – meaning around 2029–2030ish. Today, KOA describes the SBW solution as ready for series production. That is quite a big development in under a year.🤔 Of course, there might be a difference between the RWA product itself being production-ready and a complete OEM-integrated system being ready for SOP. But then I think a natural question is: Has the market received sufficient information about what has actually happened with the SBW development since December 2025? Has KOA significantly accelerated the development, or are we now talking about two different milestones? It would be interesting to get this clearly explained by the company.An easy-to-understand review using AI about this, and must therefore be taken for what it is: What you are pointing out is a classic distinction in the automotive industry between how ready the supplier is versus when a car project actually rolls off the factory floor. 1. "Ready for series production" (The product's technological maturity): When KOA/Chassis Autonomy states that the RWA solution is "ready for series production", it means that the design, architecture, safety features (fail-operational) and component-level testing are fully developed and validated. The product is industrially ready to be built on a production line and meets the requirements for mass production. 2. SOP (Start of Production) in 2029–2030 (The customer's integration cycle): Even though KOA has its product "ready", the automotive industry requires long integration runs: A car manufacturer (OEM) must first select KOA as a supplier (contract award / Nomination). The system must be adapted to the specific car model (chassis, software, crash tests and functional safety). The car manufacturer must conduct several years of winter testing, endurance testing and certification of the entire vehicle. Conclusion regarding the communication It is primarily about two different milestones: Technological/Product milestone: The product has gone from being a prototype/concept under development at Chassis Autonomy to becoming a fully industrialized, production-ready product in KOA's portfolio. Commercial SOP milestone: The timeline of 3–4 years (approx. 2029–2030) that Trond Fiskum mentioned applies to the actual start-up phase for volume delivery to specific car models, as the OEMs' own car platforms require this lead time before series production starts in the car factories.
- ·1.10.Time for a reverse stock split of e.g. 1 for 10 so we can get rid of this 0.001 øre penny stock triplet. They should also hire a media advisor before this stock gets hidden away in a pitch-black cellar. If I mention to anyone that I own shares in KOA, very few have a clue who they are and what they do.As a point of interest here, it can be mentioned that KOA in 2020 and early 2021 was one of the favorites among retail investors, and was often found among the five most traded shares on the Oslo Stock Exchange.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | - | - | ||
| 100 | - | - | ||
| 100 | - | - | ||
| 825 | - | - | ||
| 3 245 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt