Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Korkea: 6 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut1,40%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori arvometallit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- Lainoitusaste70%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The focus is on Global Precious Metal Mining Company with a special focus on transferable securities whose value development is affected by the market development for Silver.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Omistukset
Päivitetty 30.4.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet96,1%
- Muut3,5%
- Lyhyt korko0,4%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 6 t sitten · Muokattu6 t sitten · MuokattuNetanyahu says he wants to “crush” Hezbollah – orders escalation of strikes in Lebanon On Monday evening, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Telegram that the country remains at war with Hezbollah and that strikes in Lebanon will be intensified. The statement followed calls earlier that day from two ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, for an escalation — with Smotrich going as far as to demand that Beirut be bombed again. Israel has continued striking targets it links to the Hezbollah militia throughout the ceasefire reached on 16 April. According to Lebanese authorities, at least 3,123 people have been killed in Israeli strikes since 2 March, including at least 125 healthcare workers, with roughly 700 of those in the five weeks since the ceasefire took effect. Notably, when the ceasefire was reached, Trump stated that the US prohibits Israel from bombing Lebanon — so this escalation stands in clear tension with Washington’s line. For those of us tracking silver, it’s tempting to read this as a clean upside trigger, but the picture is more layered. Silver climbed toward $78 per ounce on Monday, up around 3% on the day, but the move was driven by optimism over a possible US–Iran deal — that is, by hope of de-escalation, not fear. That makes the rally fragile. It’s also crucial to remember that Netanyahu’s statement came after markets were closing on Monday evening, so we have not yet seen the actual price reaction to this specific piece of news. The figures above reflect pricing before the escalation order. The drivers pull in opposite directions. On one hand, escalation in the Middle East provides a safe-haven impulse that has historically lifted silver. On the other, the dominant dynamic throughout 2026 has been the reverse: silver has fallen on escalation when that escalation pushes oil prices higher, because energy-driven inflation fears reduce expectations of US rate cuts. Since the war began on 28 February, silver has dropped nearly 20% for precisely this reason. The question, then, is which of these forces wins out this time. This is the key insight. A Lebanon escalation that stays confined to Hezbollah — without threatening Hormuz or drawing Iran in directly — does not necessarily hit the oil market hard. The market has learned to distinguish between regional conflict and genuine supply risk. When an Israeli ground offensive in southern Lebanon was launched earlier, it had limited effect on the oil price. If the conflict stays within these bounds, the safe-haven impulse in silver could, for once, win out over the inflation-and-rate counterweight — the exact opposite of the pattern seen earlier this year. The major caveat is the Iran deal. Monday’s entire rally rests on the negotiating track staying alive, even as Rubio dampened expectations from New Delhi and Iran denied that anything was imminent. Trump has also made clear that the US will maintain the Hormuz blockade until a formal agreement is finalized. Should the Lebanon escalation contribute to the deal collapsing, the basis for Monday’s gain disappears, oil regains its risk premium, and silver lands back in the squeeze between safe-haven demand and rate/inflation fears. In that case, the same news flips from net positive to net negative. Citi has been clear that prices could rise further if the parties fail to reach a deal, and that Iran retains significant control over the timing of any reopening of Hormuz. The conclusion is therefore conditional, not directional: positive for silver if the conflict stays confined to Hezbollah and the negotiating track survives — negative if it spills over into the Iran talks or threatens Hormuz. Two opposite outcomes from the same event. What decides it is not the Lebanon statement itself, but what happens to the Iran deal over the coming days. The two things I’m watching above all in early trading are whether oil reacts (a sign of fear over Hormuz contagion) and whether signals emerge that the negotiating track is weakening. For the record: this is my own analysis of the drivers, not a recommendation to buy or sell. Sources: • VG/NTB: https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/gkLL1k/netanyahu-sier-han-vil-knuse-hizbollah-beordrer-opptrapping-av-angrepene-i-libanon • Trading Economics (silver): https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/silver • CNBC (oil, Iran war): https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/05/11/oil-price-today-brent-wti-iran-war-trump.html • goldsilver.com (analyst targets): https://goldsilver.com/industry-news/article/silver-price-outlook-may-2026-stop-chasing-the-number/
- ·16 t sittenSolar cells, which now take approx.20 % of silver production per year, will increase relative to the forecasts set for 2026. This is due to the crisis in Iran. Shows how vulnerable countries are that have oil as an energy source. These countries will increase their investment because of this. Has anyone seen any numbers on this?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Korkea: 6 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut1,40%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori arvometallit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- Lainoitusaste70%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The focus is on Global Precious Metal Mining Company with a special focus on transferable securities whose value development is affected by the market development for Silver.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Omistukset
Päivitetty 30.4.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet96,1%
- Muut3,5%
- Lyhyt korko0,4%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 6 t sitten · Muokattu6 t sitten · MuokattuNetanyahu says he wants to “crush” Hezbollah – orders escalation of strikes in Lebanon On Monday evening, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Telegram that the country remains at war with Hezbollah and that strikes in Lebanon will be intensified. The statement followed calls earlier that day from two ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, for an escalation — with Smotrich going as far as to demand that Beirut be bombed again. Israel has continued striking targets it links to the Hezbollah militia throughout the ceasefire reached on 16 April. According to Lebanese authorities, at least 3,123 people have been killed in Israeli strikes since 2 March, including at least 125 healthcare workers, with roughly 700 of those in the five weeks since the ceasefire took effect. Notably, when the ceasefire was reached, Trump stated that the US prohibits Israel from bombing Lebanon — so this escalation stands in clear tension with Washington’s line. For those of us tracking silver, it’s tempting to read this as a clean upside trigger, but the picture is more layered. Silver climbed toward $78 per ounce on Monday, up around 3% on the day, but the move was driven by optimism over a possible US–Iran deal — that is, by hope of de-escalation, not fear. That makes the rally fragile. It’s also crucial to remember that Netanyahu’s statement came after markets were closing on Monday evening, so we have not yet seen the actual price reaction to this specific piece of news. The figures above reflect pricing before the escalation order. The drivers pull in opposite directions. On one hand, escalation in the Middle East provides a safe-haven impulse that has historically lifted silver. On the other, the dominant dynamic throughout 2026 has been the reverse: silver has fallen on escalation when that escalation pushes oil prices higher, because energy-driven inflation fears reduce expectations of US rate cuts. Since the war began on 28 February, silver has dropped nearly 20% for precisely this reason. The question, then, is which of these forces wins out this time. This is the key insight. A Lebanon escalation that stays confined to Hezbollah — without threatening Hormuz or drawing Iran in directly — does not necessarily hit the oil market hard. The market has learned to distinguish between regional conflict and genuine supply risk. When an Israeli ground offensive in southern Lebanon was launched earlier, it had limited effect on the oil price. If the conflict stays within these bounds, the safe-haven impulse in silver could, for once, win out over the inflation-and-rate counterweight — the exact opposite of the pattern seen earlier this year. The major caveat is the Iran deal. Monday’s entire rally rests on the negotiating track staying alive, even as Rubio dampened expectations from New Delhi and Iran denied that anything was imminent. Trump has also made clear that the US will maintain the Hormuz blockade until a formal agreement is finalized. Should the Lebanon escalation contribute to the deal collapsing, the basis for Monday’s gain disappears, oil regains its risk premium, and silver lands back in the squeeze between safe-haven demand and rate/inflation fears. In that case, the same news flips from net positive to net negative. Citi has been clear that prices could rise further if the parties fail to reach a deal, and that Iran retains significant control over the timing of any reopening of Hormuz. The conclusion is therefore conditional, not directional: positive for silver if the conflict stays confined to Hezbollah and the negotiating track survives — negative if it spills over into the Iran talks or threatens Hormuz. Two opposite outcomes from the same event. What decides it is not the Lebanon statement itself, but what happens to the Iran deal over the coming days. The two things I’m watching above all in early trading are whether oil reacts (a sign of fear over Hormuz contagion) and whether signals emerge that the negotiating track is weakening. For the record: this is my own analysis of the drivers, not a recommendation to buy or sell. Sources: • VG/NTB: https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/gkLL1k/netanyahu-sier-han-vil-knuse-hizbollah-beordrer-opptrapping-av-angrepene-i-libanon • Trading Economics (silver): https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/silver • CNBC (oil, Iran war): https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/05/11/oil-price-today-brent-wti-iran-war-trump.html • goldsilver.com (analyst targets): https://goldsilver.com/industry-news/article/silver-price-outlook-may-2026-stop-chasing-the-number/
- ·16 t sittenSolar cells, which now take approx.20 % of silver production per year, will increase relative to the forecasts set for 2026. This is due to the crisis in Iran. Shows how vulnerable countries are that have oil as an energy source. These countries will increase their investment because of this. Has anyone seen any numbers on this?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Korkea: 6 / 7
Huomioi, että vaikka osakerahastoihin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut1,40%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori arvometallit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaEUR
- Lainoitusaste70%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The focus is on Global Precious Metal Mining Company with a special focus on transferable securities whose value development is affected by the market development for Silver.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 6 t sitten · Muokattu6 t sitten · MuokattuNetanyahu says he wants to “crush” Hezbollah – orders escalation of strikes in Lebanon On Monday evening, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Telegram that the country remains at war with Hezbollah and that strikes in Lebanon will be intensified. The statement followed calls earlier that day from two ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, for an escalation — with Smotrich going as far as to demand that Beirut be bombed again. Israel has continued striking targets it links to the Hezbollah militia throughout the ceasefire reached on 16 April. According to Lebanese authorities, at least 3,123 people have been killed in Israeli strikes since 2 March, including at least 125 healthcare workers, with roughly 700 of those in the five weeks since the ceasefire took effect. Notably, when the ceasefire was reached, Trump stated that the US prohibits Israel from bombing Lebanon — so this escalation stands in clear tension with Washington’s line. For those of us tracking silver, it’s tempting to read this as a clean upside trigger, but the picture is more layered. Silver climbed toward $78 per ounce on Monday, up around 3% on the day, but the move was driven by optimism over a possible US–Iran deal — that is, by hope of de-escalation, not fear. That makes the rally fragile. It’s also crucial to remember that Netanyahu’s statement came after markets were closing on Monday evening, so we have not yet seen the actual price reaction to this specific piece of news. The figures above reflect pricing before the escalation order. The drivers pull in opposite directions. On one hand, escalation in the Middle East provides a safe-haven impulse that has historically lifted silver. On the other, the dominant dynamic throughout 2026 has been the reverse: silver has fallen on escalation when that escalation pushes oil prices higher, because energy-driven inflation fears reduce expectations of US rate cuts. Since the war began on 28 February, silver has dropped nearly 20% for precisely this reason. The question, then, is which of these forces wins out this time. This is the key insight. A Lebanon escalation that stays confined to Hezbollah — without threatening Hormuz or drawing Iran in directly — does not necessarily hit the oil market hard. The market has learned to distinguish between regional conflict and genuine supply risk. When an Israeli ground offensive in southern Lebanon was launched earlier, it had limited effect on the oil price. If the conflict stays within these bounds, the safe-haven impulse in silver could, for once, win out over the inflation-and-rate counterweight — the exact opposite of the pattern seen earlier this year. The major caveat is the Iran deal. Monday’s entire rally rests on the negotiating track staying alive, even as Rubio dampened expectations from New Delhi and Iran denied that anything was imminent. Trump has also made clear that the US will maintain the Hormuz blockade until a formal agreement is finalized. Should the Lebanon escalation contribute to the deal collapsing, the basis for Monday’s gain disappears, oil regains its risk premium, and silver lands back in the squeeze between safe-haven demand and rate/inflation fears. In that case, the same news flips from net positive to net negative. Citi has been clear that prices could rise further if the parties fail to reach a deal, and that Iran retains significant control over the timing of any reopening of Hormuz. The conclusion is therefore conditional, not directional: positive for silver if the conflict stays confined to Hezbollah and the negotiating track survives — negative if it spills over into the Iran talks or threatens Hormuz. Two opposite outcomes from the same event. What decides it is not the Lebanon statement itself, but what happens to the Iran deal over the coming days. The two things I’m watching above all in early trading are whether oil reacts (a sign of fear over Hormuz contagion) and whether signals emerge that the negotiating track is weakening. For the record: this is my own analysis of the drivers, not a recommendation to buy or sell. Sources: • VG/NTB: https://www.vg.no/nyheter/i/gkLL1k/netanyahu-sier-han-vil-knuse-hizbollah-beordrer-opptrapping-av-angrepene-i-libanon • Trading Economics (silver): https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/silver • CNBC (oil, Iran war): https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/05/11/oil-price-today-brent-wti-iran-war-trump.html • goldsilver.com (analyst targets): https://goldsilver.com/industry-news/article/silver-price-outlook-may-2026-stop-chasing-the-number/
- ·16 t sittenSolar cells, which now take approx.20 % of silver production per year, will increase relative to the forecasts set for 2026. This is due to the crisis in Iran. Shows how vulnerable countries are that have oil as an energy source. These countries will increase their investment because of this. Has anyone seen any numbers on this?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Omistukset
Päivitetty 30.4.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet96,1%
- Muut3,5%
- Lyhyt korko0,4%



