2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
3 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | - | - | ||
| 29 | - | - | ||
| 18 | - | - | ||
| 170 | - | - | ||
| 45 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 8 383 | 8 383 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 8 383 | 8 383 | 0 | 0 |
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 14.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·3 päivää sittenLess wild today :-(
·3 päivää sittenThanks for the info. For a new investor like me (approx. 2.5 years), such knowledge sharing is great.
·3 päivää sittenYou're welcome. Just remember that I, like everyone else here, am a stranger on an internet forum whom you don't know much about, so always critically evaluate everyone's posts. Some, like me (and you), choose to share our portfolios, which makes it possible to seem like we have reason to have bias due to an investment and whether we know enough about the market to be able to generate a reasonable return, but in the end, one should always evaluate our arguments. In that light, I will elaborate on what I wrote above: There are fundamentally two ways to make money on stocks: By the company developing and making money and therefore becoming more valuable, and by hoping to buy too cheap and sell too expensive because those you trade with misjudge the stock. The first is almost guaranteed to happen if one holds a broad selection of stocks for a long time. The second requires that one understands the stocks one trades with (or the market psychology around them) better than those one trades with, because one must always remember that if one buys a stock too cheap, others must have sold too cheap. Furthermore, every time you buy and sell, both you and the person you trade with pay brokerage fees and perhaps also tax. This means that not only does someone win and someone else lose every time, but if you add the gain and the loss together, you both end up having lost money on the trade due to brokerage fees and tax. You therefore have to be significantly better than the market to actually make money by trading, while you have to be much worse than the market to lose money by buying a broad selection of stocks and holding them for a long time. That being said, the potential gain from constantly trading is greater than from holding stocks for a long time, and this tempts many to gamble with trades rather than holding the stocks instead of investing in them.
·16.4.Wild development today!
·3 päivää sittenHowever, I think their CEO is extremely likable and has a lot of experience behind them - Has a price target of 50kr and hopes to be able to buy in there.·3 päivää sittenI have primarily used them for family moves and here cleanliness didn't matter that much either, so it wasn't something I was super focused on, but as I said, I would also rather look at the development in revenue than at my few own experiences. And for me, the secret behind my good return is largely to hold my shares for a long time and diversify quite a bit. I have also accounted for this in another post above.
·16.4.Find it a bit unambitious that expansion to more cities is not being considered, despite them having failed before. Odense must have potential. As well as the world. They should hire a globetrotter like me to scout demand, regulation, parking options etc. in European cities before others take them over. That said, well done in a difficult industry. They should also get cameras in the cabins so they can identify those who leave disgusting cars. Give them fines and suspensions / permanent ban = nice cars for the decent people instead of the disrespectful ones.·3 päivää sittenFrom what I understand from them, Aarhus doesn't perform as well as Kbh, so going to even smaller cities, I'm not sure it makes sense at the moment. With self-driving cars, this could easily change as they are less dependent on a new customer being right near where the last customer went, but until then, I can have my doubts. If they are to do something, in my eyes, they should try abroad again, but it requires them to find the right city: -The city should preferably be like Kbh or larger. -There should be many people who don't own a car close to each other. Here, Kbh is ideal as many people cycle and use public transport. -There shouldn't be too much competition already that pushes prices down and makes it difficult to acquire customers (why switch to GreenM if you already use others you are satisfied with). Conversely, it also takes many years to teach a population to use shared cars instead of owning their own cars, so it can easily take 5 years with a deficit before they get a profit if they start in an untried city. From my perspective, the ideal scenario is that a city with a good cycling culture (e.g., in Holland) has a car-sharing company that doesn't make money (which applies to many of them) and that gives up/goes bankrupt, where GREENM can then come in from the sidelines and take over the entire customer base and build upon that. But that kind of thing is very dependent on timing. They tried something similar before they chose to give up abroad, but it was somewhat spoiled by Covid-19.
·16.4.Car-sharing service Greenmobility continued its solid growth and sustained earnings improvements in the first quarter, which secured black figures on the bottom line for the first time in the company's history in the full year 2025. In the quarter, revenue grew by 8 pct. to DKK 35.5 million from DKK 32.8 million in the first three months of last year, and at the same time, earnings increased significantly, as the operating result before depreciation, amortization, interest, and taxes (EBITDA) advanced to DKK 11.0 million from DKK 6.9 million in the first quarter of 2025. This corresponds to an EBITDA margin of 31 pct. against 21.1 pct. in the first quarter last year. In the first quarter 2026, which is seasonally the weakest quarter for Greenmobility, operations have continued to show a significant month-on-month improvement, which underlines that Greenmobility is on track to meet our expectations for 2026, the company writes in a brief interim report. For the full year 2026, the company still expects revenue growth of 8-12 pct. and growth in operating result (EBITDA) of 12-16 pct. Table of Greenmobility's financial results for the first quarter of 2026: Million DKK Q1 '26: Q1 '25: FY '25: Revenue 35.5 32.8 153.9 EBITDA 11.0 6.9 54.0
·16.4.That need is still there, the trip to Aunt Oda.... more the everyday need I'm thinking of. When I bought, I wondered if it would be bought up by a private equity fund. What does the sharp panel say to that thought?·3 päivää sittenI certainly hope they are not sold to a private equity fund: Private equity funds very often buy companies very cheaply and I have no interest in selling too cheaply. Should a large transport giant come along who would like to get hold of what is perhaps the best-performing car-sharing company in Europe, that would be a different matter as they would be able to get a lot of synergies out of it, and that means they would be able to pay a high price for the company. However, it is harder to see the synergies a private equity fund could get out of the company: -They cannot do a turnaround because it has already been done, so now things are going really well. -They cannot add money as operations generate profit and they largely do not need to spend money on their growth. -They could in principle use it to expand out of DK, but that is neither easy nor cheap to do, so there are probably limits to how much they will pay for it. I still see a quite significant upside in GREENM even after today's development and would rather have it than a low bid from a private equity fund that cannot get much extra value out of the company.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
3 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenLess wild today :-(·3 päivää sittenThanks for the info. For a new investor like me (approx. 2.5 years), such knowledge sharing is great.·3 päivää sittenYou're welcome. Just remember that I, like everyone else here, am a stranger on an internet forum whom you don't know much about, so always critically evaluate everyone's posts. Some, like me (and you), choose to share our portfolios, which makes it possible to seem like we have reason to have bias due to an investment and whether we know enough about the market to be able to generate a reasonable return, but in the end, one should always evaluate our arguments. In that light, I will elaborate on what I wrote above: There are fundamentally two ways to make money on stocks: By the company developing and making money and therefore becoming more valuable, and by hoping to buy too cheap and sell too expensive because those you trade with misjudge the stock. The first is almost guaranteed to happen if one holds a broad selection of stocks for a long time. The second requires that one understands the stocks one trades with (or the market psychology around them) better than those one trades with, because one must always remember that if one buys a stock too cheap, others must have sold too cheap. Furthermore, every time you buy and sell, both you and the person you trade with pay brokerage fees and perhaps also tax. This means that not only does someone win and someone else lose every time, but if you add the gain and the loss together, you both end up having lost money on the trade due to brokerage fees and tax. You therefore have to be significantly better than the market to actually make money by trading, while you have to be much worse than the market to lose money by buying a broad selection of stocks and holding them for a long time. That being said, the potential gain from constantly trading is greater than from holding stocks for a long time, and this tempts many to gamble with trades rather than holding the stocks instead of investing in them.
- ·16.4.Wild development today!·3 päivää sittenHowever, I think their CEO is extremely likable and has a lot of experience behind them - Has a price target of 50kr and hopes to be able to buy in there.·3 päivää sittenI have primarily used them for family moves and here cleanliness didn't matter that much either, so it wasn't something I was super focused on, but as I said, I would also rather look at the development in revenue than at my few own experiences. And for me, the secret behind my good return is largely to hold my shares for a long time and diversify quite a bit. I have also accounted for this in another post above.
- ·16.4.Find it a bit unambitious that expansion to more cities is not being considered, despite them having failed before. Odense must have potential. As well as the world. They should hire a globetrotter like me to scout demand, regulation, parking options etc. in European cities before others take them over. That said, well done in a difficult industry. They should also get cameras in the cabins so they can identify those who leave disgusting cars. Give them fines and suspensions / permanent ban = nice cars for the decent people instead of the disrespectful ones.·3 päivää sittenFrom what I understand from them, Aarhus doesn't perform as well as Kbh, so going to even smaller cities, I'm not sure it makes sense at the moment. With self-driving cars, this could easily change as they are less dependent on a new customer being right near where the last customer went, but until then, I can have my doubts. If they are to do something, in my eyes, they should try abroad again, but it requires them to find the right city: -The city should preferably be like Kbh or larger. -There should be many people who don't own a car close to each other. Here, Kbh is ideal as many people cycle and use public transport. -There shouldn't be too much competition already that pushes prices down and makes it difficult to acquire customers (why switch to GreenM if you already use others you are satisfied with). Conversely, it also takes many years to teach a population to use shared cars instead of owning their own cars, so it can easily take 5 years with a deficit before they get a profit if they start in an untried city. From my perspective, the ideal scenario is that a city with a good cycling culture (e.g., in Holland) has a car-sharing company that doesn't make money (which applies to many of them) and that gives up/goes bankrupt, where GREENM can then come in from the sidelines and take over the entire customer base and build upon that. But that kind of thing is very dependent on timing. They tried something similar before they chose to give up abroad, but it was somewhat spoiled by Covid-19.
- ·16.4.Car-sharing service Greenmobility continued its solid growth and sustained earnings improvements in the first quarter, which secured black figures on the bottom line for the first time in the company's history in the full year 2025. In the quarter, revenue grew by 8 pct. to DKK 35.5 million from DKK 32.8 million in the first three months of last year, and at the same time, earnings increased significantly, as the operating result before depreciation, amortization, interest, and taxes (EBITDA) advanced to DKK 11.0 million from DKK 6.9 million in the first quarter of 2025. This corresponds to an EBITDA margin of 31 pct. against 21.1 pct. in the first quarter last year. In the first quarter 2026, which is seasonally the weakest quarter for Greenmobility, operations have continued to show a significant month-on-month improvement, which underlines that Greenmobility is on track to meet our expectations for 2026, the company writes in a brief interim report. For the full year 2026, the company still expects revenue growth of 8-12 pct. and growth in operating result (EBITDA) of 12-16 pct. Table of Greenmobility's financial results for the first quarter of 2026: Million DKK Q1 '26: Q1 '25: FY '25: Revenue 35.5 32.8 153.9 EBITDA 11.0 6.9 54.0·16.4.That need is still there, the trip to Aunt Oda.... more the everyday need I'm thinking of. When I bought, I wondered if it would be bought up by a private equity fund. What does the sharp panel say to that thought?·3 päivää sittenI certainly hope they are not sold to a private equity fund: Private equity funds very often buy companies very cheaply and I have no interest in selling too cheaply. Should a large transport giant come along who would like to get hold of what is perhaps the best-performing car-sharing company in Europe, that would be a different matter as they would be able to get a lot of synergies out of it, and that means they would be able to pay a high price for the company. However, it is harder to see the synergies a private equity fund could get out of the company: -They cannot do a turnaround because it has already been done, so now things are going really well. -They cannot add money as operations generate profit and they largely do not need to spend money on their growth. -They could in principle use it to expand out of DK, but that is neither easy nor cheap to do, so there are probably limits to how much they will pay for it. I still see a quite significant upside in GREENM even after today's development and would rather have it than a low bid from a private equity fund that cannot get much extra value out of the company.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | - | - | ||
| 29 | - | - | ||
| 18 | - | - | ||
| 170 | - | - | ||
| 45 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 8 383 | 8 383 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 8 383 | 8 383 | 0 | 0 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 14.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
3 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 14.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenLess wild today :-(·3 päivää sittenThanks for the info. For a new investor like me (approx. 2.5 years), such knowledge sharing is great.·3 päivää sittenYou're welcome. Just remember that I, like everyone else here, am a stranger on an internet forum whom you don't know much about, so always critically evaluate everyone's posts. Some, like me (and you), choose to share our portfolios, which makes it possible to seem like we have reason to have bias due to an investment and whether we know enough about the market to be able to generate a reasonable return, but in the end, one should always evaluate our arguments. In that light, I will elaborate on what I wrote above: There are fundamentally two ways to make money on stocks: By the company developing and making money and therefore becoming more valuable, and by hoping to buy too cheap and sell too expensive because those you trade with misjudge the stock. The first is almost guaranteed to happen if one holds a broad selection of stocks for a long time. The second requires that one understands the stocks one trades with (or the market psychology around them) better than those one trades with, because one must always remember that if one buys a stock too cheap, others must have sold too cheap. Furthermore, every time you buy and sell, both you and the person you trade with pay brokerage fees and perhaps also tax. This means that not only does someone win and someone else lose every time, but if you add the gain and the loss together, you both end up having lost money on the trade due to brokerage fees and tax. You therefore have to be significantly better than the market to actually make money by trading, while you have to be much worse than the market to lose money by buying a broad selection of stocks and holding them for a long time. That being said, the potential gain from constantly trading is greater than from holding stocks for a long time, and this tempts many to gamble with trades rather than holding the stocks instead of investing in them.
- ·16.4.Wild development today!·3 päivää sittenHowever, I think their CEO is extremely likable and has a lot of experience behind them - Has a price target of 50kr and hopes to be able to buy in there.·3 päivää sittenI have primarily used them for family moves and here cleanliness didn't matter that much either, so it wasn't something I was super focused on, but as I said, I would also rather look at the development in revenue than at my few own experiences. And for me, the secret behind my good return is largely to hold my shares for a long time and diversify quite a bit. I have also accounted for this in another post above.
- ·16.4.Find it a bit unambitious that expansion to more cities is not being considered, despite them having failed before. Odense must have potential. As well as the world. They should hire a globetrotter like me to scout demand, regulation, parking options etc. in European cities before others take them over. That said, well done in a difficult industry. They should also get cameras in the cabins so they can identify those who leave disgusting cars. Give them fines and suspensions / permanent ban = nice cars for the decent people instead of the disrespectful ones.·3 päivää sittenFrom what I understand from them, Aarhus doesn't perform as well as Kbh, so going to even smaller cities, I'm not sure it makes sense at the moment. With self-driving cars, this could easily change as they are less dependent on a new customer being right near where the last customer went, but until then, I can have my doubts. If they are to do something, in my eyes, they should try abroad again, but it requires them to find the right city: -The city should preferably be like Kbh or larger. -There should be many people who don't own a car close to each other. Here, Kbh is ideal as many people cycle and use public transport. -There shouldn't be too much competition already that pushes prices down and makes it difficult to acquire customers (why switch to GreenM if you already use others you are satisfied with). Conversely, it also takes many years to teach a population to use shared cars instead of owning their own cars, so it can easily take 5 years with a deficit before they get a profit if they start in an untried city. From my perspective, the ideal scenario is that a city with a good cycling culture (e.g., in Holland) has a car-sharing company that doesn't make money (which applies to many of them) and that gives up/goes bankrupt, where GREENM can then come in from the sidelines and take over the entire customer base and build upon that. But that kind of thing is very dependent on timing. They tried something similar before they chose to give up abroad, but it was somewhat spoiled by Covid-19.
- ·16.4.Car-sharing service Greenmobility continued its solid growth and sustained earnings improvements in the first quarter, which secured black figures on the bottom line for the first time in the company's history in the full year 2025. In the quarter, revenue grew by 8 pct. to DKK 35.5 million from DKK 32.8 million in the first three months of last year, and at the same time, earnings increased significantly, as the operating result before depreciation, amortization, interest, and taxes (EBITDA) advanced to DKK 11.0 million from DKK 6.9 million in the first quarter of 2025. This corresponds to an EBITDA margin of 31 pct. against 21.1 pct. in the first quarter last year. In the first quarter 2026, which is seasonally the weakest quarter for Greenmobility, operations have continued to show a significant month-on-month improvement, which underlines that Greenmobility is on track to meet our expectations for 2026, the company writes in a brief interim report. For the full year 2026, the company still expects revenue growth of 8-12 pct. and growth in operating result (EBITDA) of 12-16 pct. Table of Greenmobility's financial results for the first quarter of 2026: Million DKK Q1 '26: Q1 '25: FY '25: Revenue 35.5 32.8 153.9 EBITDA 11.0 6.9 54.0·16.4.That need is still there, the trip to Aunt Oda.... more the everyday need I'm thinking of. When I bought, I wondered if it would be bought up by a private equity fund. What does the sharp panel say to that thought?·3 päivää sittenI certainly hope they are not sold to a private equity fund: Private equity funds very often buy companies very cheaply and I have no interest in selling too cheaply. Should a large transport giant come along who would like to get hold of what is perhaps the best-performing car-sharing company in Europe, that would be a different matter as they would be able to get a lot of synergies out of it, and that means they would be able to pay a high price for the company. However, it is harder to see the synergies a private equity fund could get out of the company: -They cannot do a turnaround because it has already been done, so now things are going really well. -They cannot add money as operations generate profit and they largely do not need to spend money on their growth. -They could in principle use it to expand out of DK, but that is neither easy nor cheap to do, so there are probably limits to how much they will pay for it. I still see a quite significant upside in GREENM even after today's development and would rather have it than a low bid from a private equity fund that cannot get much extra value out of the company.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86 | - | - | ||
| 29 | - | - | ||
| 18 | - | - | ||
| 170 | - | - | ||
| 45 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 8 383 | 8 383 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 8 383 | 8 383 | 0 | 0 |