2026 H1 -tulosraportti
31 päivää sitten
‧28 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 8.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 10.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·3.8.Exciting with WeRide partnership! What do you think about it?
Absolutely terrible idea. GreenMobility is, in my opinion, forced to enter into an unequal partnership with a Chinese company, which will probably itself have difficulty quickly building a customer base in DK. However, unlike GM, they have money from home and an eagerness to take over what they can take over. From a societal perspective, it is quite concerning that Danish customers must hand over their data to a Chinese company. It is equally concerning that GM customers and shareholders are slowly becoming involved in a Chinese story. If one looks objectively at GM, their real chance of survival is continued strong growth. A growth that is currently stalled, which means they will now be caught up by large expenses for leasing agreements, damages, etc. That GM lets 17-year-olds rent their cars is, in my opinion, a sign of greed or panic in a company that is only interested in growth. They will pay a price for that. Young people who get into their vehicles while under the influence of drugs and alcohol will be left with a huge debt to GM, which they probably cannot pay off if caught in the act. The GM concept is a super good idea, which unfortunately has proven in practice to be associated with major challenges. When you read how many minutes a vehicle is rented on average, you can see that something is wrong. The company has to pay for leasing, insurance, parking, and all the other fixed expenses of the company. I am periodically a user of the GM concept and think it's an easy and smart way to rent a car. But when I see a vehicle on the street and see all the scrapes, dents, and scratches, I doubt whether the company has the robustness required to keep a company running in the long term. As a user, one often experiences missing lights, tire pressure, etc., conditions that should have been fixed. Furthermore, most of the cars are dirty both outside and inside. It is difficult as an honest renter to determine if one will be blamed for damages after the trip because it is impossible to oversee the amount that is already there.
·24.7.Exciting with the new taxi company GREEN in Denmark/Copenhagen, can't help but think it would be interesting to acquire/collaborate with GM.
7.7.Why the sudden drop?
They have issued a downgrade (see news). Personally, I think it's an overreaction: yes, they are downgrading top-line guidance but maintaining their EBITDA guidance. It is naturally negative, but they are still guiding for 5-9% top-line growth this year, which most companies can only dream of, and their 112% bottom-line growth is really, really impressive - especially since it is now compared to a period where their focus on Copenhagen was implemented. Part of that growth is due to initiatives from last year, so unfortunately we probably won't see the same rates in H2, but even less would be acceptable. I think it's mostly a reaction to greenm having gone from upgrading 4 times last year to downgrading once so far this year, and that creates some nervousness. That said, they mention 4 things that went wrong and still maintain EBITDA guidance, which strengthens my belief that their original guidance was probably a bit conservative and that there could have been room for an upgrade of it if fewer things had gone wrong.
·2.7.Now I have tried to buy into this one. All the numbers look good to me - but I have a single hypothesis that I want to hear what you think about? What can GM do that Google, Tesla or Uber cannot just go in and do?They already have the customers, they already have data on where and how the cars should be distributed at different times of day/year and they have experience maintaining a free-floating fleet in Copenhagen. Yes, some already have some of it and all of that is naturally something a competitor can learn/build up but it will take years to match GreenM and the question is whether it wouldn't be better to buy GreenM and gain a head start on the other international competitors? GreenM has competed with several other significantly larger companies and in DK, GreenM has currently won every time. That's not to say they can't lose in the future and that a large international company beats them in connection with the transition to self-driving cars is also what I see as the biggest risk in the case.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 H1 -tulosraportti
31 päivää sitten
‧28 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·3.8.Exciting with WeRide partnership! What do you think about it?Absolutely terrible idea. GreenMobility is, in my opinion, forced to enter into an unequal partnership with a Chinese company, which will probably itself have difficulty quickly building a customer base in DK. However, unlike GM, they have money from home and an eagerness to take over what they can take over. From a societal perspective, it is quite concerning that Danish customers must hand over their data to a Chinese company. It is equally concerning that GM customers and shareholders are slowly becoming involved in a Chinese story. If one looks objectively at GM, their real chance of survival is continued strong growth. A growth that is currently stalled, which means they will now be caught up by large expenses for leasing agreements, damages, etc. That GM lets 17-year-olds rent their cars is, in my opinion, a sign of greed or panic in a company that is only interested in growth. They will pay a price for that. Young people who get into their vehicles while under the influence of drugs and alcohol will be left with a huge debt to GM, which they probably cannot pay off if caught in the act. The GM concept is a super good idea, which unfortunately has proven in practice to be associated with major challenges. When you read how many minutes a vehicle is rented on average, you can see that something is wrong. The company has to pay for leasing, insurance, parking, and all the other fixed expenses of the company. I am periodically a user of the GM concept and think it's an easy and smart way to rent a car. But when I see a vehicle on the street and see all the scrapes, dents, and scratches, I doubt whether the company has the robustness required to keep a company running in the long term. As a user, one often experiences missing lights, tire pressure, etc., conditions that should have been fixed. Furthermore, most of the cars are dirty both outside and inside. It is difficult as an honest renter to determine if one will be blamed for damages after the trip because it is impossible to oversee the amount that is already there.
- ·24.7.Exciting with the new taxi company GREEN in Denmark/Copenhagen, can't help but think it would be interesting to acquire/collaborate with GM.
- 7.7.Why the sudden drop?They have issued a downgrade (see news). Personally, I think it's an overreaction: yes, they are downgrading top-line guidance but maintaining their EBITDA guidance. It is naturally negative, but they are still guiding for 5-9% top-line growth this year, which most companies can only dream of, and their 112% bottom-line growth is really, really impressive - especially since it is now compared to a period where their focus on Copenhagen was implemented. Part of that growth is due to initiatives from last year, so unfortunately we probably won't see the same rates in H2, but even less would be acceptable. I think it's mostly a reaction to greenm having gone from upgrading 4 times last year to downgrading once so far this year, and that creates some nervousness. That said, they mention 4 things that went wrong and still maintain EBITDA guidance, which strengthens my belief that their original guidance was probably a bit conservative and that there could have been room for an upgrade of it if fewer things had gone wrong.
- ·2.7.Now I have tried to buy into this one. All the numbers look good to me - but I have a single hypothesis that I want to hear what you think about? What can GM do that Google, Tesla or Uber cannot just go in and do?They already have the customers, they already have data on where and how the cars should be distributed at different times of day/year and they have experience maintaining a free-floating fleet in Copenhagen. Yes, some already have some of it and all of that is naturally something a competitor can learn/build up but it will take years to match GreenM and the question is whether it wouldn't be better to buy GreenM and gain a head start on the other international competitors? GreenM has competed with several other significantly larger companies and in DK, GreenM has currently won every time. That's not to say they can't lose in the future and that a large international company beats them in connection with the transition to self-driving cars is also what I see as the biggest risk in the case.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 8.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 10.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
2026 H1 -tulosraportti
31 päivää sitten
‧28 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 8.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 10.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·3.8.Exciting with WeRide partnership! What do you think about it?Absolutely terrible idea. GreenMobility is, in my opinion, forced to enter into an unequal partnership with a Chinese company, which will probably itself have difficulty quickly building a customer base in DK. However, unlike GM, they have money from home and an eagerness to take over what they can take over. From a societal perspective, it is quite concerning that Danish customers must hand over their data to a Chinese company. It is equally concerning that GM customers and shareholders are slowly becoming involved in a Chinese story. If one looks objectively at GM, their real chance of survival is continued strong growth. A growth that is currently stalled, which means they will now be caught up by large expenses for leasing agreements, damages, etc. That GM lets 17-year-olds rent their cars is, in my opinion, a sign of greed or panic in a company that is only interested in growth. They will pay a price for that. Young people who get into their vehicles while under the influence of drugs and alcohol will be left with a huge debt to GM, which they probably cannot pay off if caught in the act. The GM concept is a super good idea, which unfortunately has proven in practice to be associated with major challenges. When you read how many minutes a vehicle is rented on average, you can see that something is wrong. The company has to pay for leasing, insurance, parking, and all the other fixed expenses of the company. I am periodically a user of the GM concept and think it's an easy and smart way to rent a car. But when I see a vehicle on the street and see all the scrapes, dents, and scratches, I doubt whether the company has the robustness required to keep a company running in the long term. As a user, one often experiences missing lights, tire pressure, etc., conditions that should have been fixed. Furthermore, most of the cars are dirty both outside and inside. It is difficult as an honest renter to determine if one will be blamed for damages after the trip because it is impossible to oversee the amount that is already there.
- ·24.7.Exciting with the new taxi company GREEN in Denmark/Copenhagen, can't help but think it would be interesting to acquire/collaborate with GM.
- 7.7.Why the sudden drop?They have issued a downgrade (see news). Personally, I think it's an overreaction: yes, they are downgrading top-line guidance but maintaining their EBITDA guidance. It is naturally negative, but they are still guiding for 5-9% top-line growth this year, which most companies can only dream of, and their 112% bottom-line growth is really, really impressive - especially since it is now compared to a period where their focus on Copenhagen was implemented. Part of that growth is due to initiatives from last year, so unfortunately we probably won't see the same rates in H2, but even less would be acceptable. I think it's mostly a reaction to greenm having gone from upgrading 4 times last year to downgrading once so far this year, and that creates some nervousness. That said, they mention 4 things that went wrong and still maintain EBITDA guidance, which strengthens my belief that their original guidance was probably a bit conservative and that there could have been room for an upgrade of it if fewer things had gone wrong.
- ·2.7.Now I have tried to buy into this one. All the numbers look good to me - but I have a single hypothesis that I want to hear what you think about? What can GM do that Google, Tesla or Uber cannot just go in and do?They already have the customers, they already have data on where and how the cars should be distributed at different times of day/year and they have experience maintaining a free-floating fleet in Copenhagen. Yes, some already have some of it and all of that is naturally something a competitor can learn/build up but it will take years to match GreenM and the question is whether it wouldn't be better to buy GreenM and gain a head start on the other international competitors? GreenM has competed with several other significantly larger companies and in DK, GreenM has currently won every time. That's not to say they can't lose in the future and that a large international company beats them in connection with the transition to self-driving cars is also what I see as the biggest risk in the case.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt