2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
10 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 230 | - | - | ||
| 82 | - | - | ||
| 300 | - | - | ||
| 12 | - | - | ||
| 26 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 3 495 | 3 495 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 3 495 | 3 495 | 0 | 0 |
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 14.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·22.4.Interestingly enough, the general meeting has given management authorization to buy shares for 50 million DKK until 2031, among other things with the possibility to cancel them. The CEO has stated several times that he is in favor of share buybacks when the solvency ratio is over 20%, which it reached in connection with Q4. It is important that the solvency ratio remains over 20% as it significantly impacts borrowing opportunities, including leasing of new cars, so we should not expect massive buybacks, but my primary scenario is now that the company will buy back shares for 5-10 million DKK this year. Not enough to make a huge difference, but a nice supplement to the expected growth.
·2 t sittenRight now, the chart is probably just following its pattern. Maybe it needs to go all the way down to 65 before it starts to move up again.·1 t sittenIn this context, I am now also thinking more 3+ years than 10 years. But if one wants to realize the profit before the share buybacks start, it is of course less optimal. (I myself am in my 40s so I have okay time).
·17.4.Less wild today :-(·17.4.Thanks for the info. For a new investor like me (approx. 2.5 years), such knowledge sharing is great.·17.4.You're welcome. Just remember that I, like everyone else here, am a stranger on an internet forum whom you don't know much about, so always critically evaluate everyone's posts. Some, like me (and you), choose to share our portfolios, which makes it possible to seem like we have reason to have bias due to an investment and whether we know enough about the market to be able to generate a reasonable return, but in the end, one should always evaluate our arguments. In that light, I will elaborate on what I wrote above: There are fundamentally two ways to make money on stocks: By the company developing and making money and therefore becoming more valuable, and by hoping to buy too cheap and sell too expensive because those you trade with misjudge the stock. The first is almost guaranteed to happen if one holds a broad selection of stocks for a long time. The second requires that one understands the stocks one trades with (or the market psychology around them) better than those one trades with, because one must always remember that if one buys a stock too cheap, others must have sold too cheap. Furthermore, every time you buy and sell, both you and the person you trade with pay brokerage fees and perhaps also tax. This means that not only does someone win and someone else lose every time, but if you add the gain and the loss together, you both end up having lost money on the trade due to brokerage fees and tax. You therefore have to be significantly better than the market to actually make money by trading, while you have to be much worse than the market to lose money by buying a broad selection of stocks and holding them for a long time. That being said, the potential gain from constantly trading is greater than from holding stocks for a long time, and this tempts many to gamble with trades rather than holding the stocks instead of investing in them.
·16.4.Wild development today!
·17.4.However, I think their CEO is extremely likable and has a lot of experience behind them - Has a price target of 50kr and hopes to be able to buy in there.·17.4.I have primarily used them for family moves and here cleanliness didn't matter that much either, so it wasn't something I was super focused on, but as I said, I would also rather look at the development in revenue than at my few own experiences. And for me, the secret behind my good return is largely to hold my shares for a long time and diversify quite a bit. I have also accounted for this in another post above.
·16.4.Find it a bit unambitious that expansion to more cities is not being considered, despite them having failed before. Odense must have potential. As well as the world. They should hire a globetrotter like me to scout demand, regulation, parking options etc. in European cities before others take them over. That said, well done in a difficult industry. They should also get cameras in the cabins so they can identify those who leave disgusting cars. Give them fines and suspensions / permanent ban = nice cars for the decent people instead of the disrespectful ones.·17.4.From what I understand from them, Aarhus doesn't perform as well as Kbh, so going to even smaller cities, I'm not sure it makes sense at the moment. With self-driving cars, this could easily change as they are less dependent on a new customer being right near where the last customer went, but until then, I can have my doubts. If they are to do something, in my eyes, they should try abroad again, but it requires them to find the right city: -The city should preferably be like Kbh or larger. -There should be many people who don't own a car close to each other. Here, Kbh is ideal as many people cycle and use public transport. -There shouldn't be too much competition already that pushes prices down and makes it difficult to acquire customers (why switch to GreenM if you already use others you are satisfied with). Conversely, it also takes many years to teach a population to use shared cars instead of owning their own cars, so it can easily take 5 years with a deficit before they get a profit if they start in an untried city. From my perspective, the ideal scenario is that a city with a good cycling culture (e.g., in Holland) has a car-sharing company that doesn't make money (which applies to many of them) and that gives up/goes bankrupt, where GREENM can then come in from the sidelines and take over the entire customer base and build upon that. But that kind of thing is very dependent on timing. They tried something similar before they chose to give up abroad, but it was somewhat spoiled by Covid-19.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
10 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·22.4.Interestingly enough, the general meeting has given management authorization to buy shares for 50 million DKK until 2031, among other things with the possibility to cancel them. The CEO has stated several times that he is in favor of share buybacks when the solvency ratio is over 20%, which it reached in connection with Q4. It is important that the solvency ratio remains over 20% as it significantly impacts borrowing opportunities, including leasing of new cars, so we should not expect massive buybacks, but my primary scenario is now that the company will buy back shares for 5-10 million DKK this year. Not enough to make a huge difference, but a nice supplement to the expected growth.·2 t sittenRight now, the chart is probably just following its pattern. Maybe it needs to go all the way down to 65 before it starts to move up again.·1 t sittenIn this context, I am now also thinking more 3+ years than 10 years. But if one wants to realize the profit before the share buybacks start, it is of course less optimal. (I myself am in my 40s so I have okay time).
- ·17.4.Less wild today :-(·17.4.Thanks for the info. For a new investor like me (approx. 2.5 years), such knowledge sharing is great.·17.4.You're welcome. Just remember that I, like everyone else here, am a stranger on an internet forum whom you don't know much about, so always critically evaluate everyone's posts. Some, like me (and you), choose to share our portfolios, which makes it possible to seem like we have reason to have bias due to an investment and whether we know enough about the market to be able to generate a reasonable return, but in the end, one should always evaluate our arguments. In that light, I will elaborate on what I wrote above: There are fundamentally two ways to make money on stocks: By the company developing and making money and therefore becoming more valuable, and by hoping to buy too cheap and sell too expensive because those you trade with misjudge the stock. The first is almost guaranteed to happen if one holds a broad selection of stocks for a long time. The second requires that one understands the stocks one trades with (or the market psychology around them) better than those one trades with, because one must always remember that if one buys a stock too cheap, others must have sold too cheap. Furthermore, every time you buy and sell, both you and the person you trade with pay brokerage fees and perhaps also tax. This means that not only does someone win and someone else lose every time, but if you add the gain and the loss together, you both end up having lost money on the trade due to brokerage fees and tax. You therefore have to be significantly better than the market to actually make money by trading, while you have to be much worse than the market to lose money by buying a broad selection of stocks and holding them for a long time. That being said, the potential gain from constantly trading is greater than from holding stocks for a long time, and this tempts many to gamble with trades rather than holding the stocks instead of investing in them.
- ·16.4.Wild development today!·17.4.However, I think their CEO is extremely likable and has a lot of experience behind them - Has a price target of 50kr and hopes to be able to buy in there.·17.4.I have primarily used them for family moves and here cleanliness didn't matter that much either, so it wasn't something I was super focused on, but as I said, I would also rather look at the development in revenue than at my few own experiences. And for me, the secret behind my good return is largely to hold my shares for a long time and diversify quite a bit. I have also accounted for this in another post above.
- ·16.4.Find it a bit unambitious that expansion to more cities is not being considered, despite them having failed before. Odense must have potential. As well as the world. They should hire a globetrotter like me to scout demand, regulation, parking options etc. in European cities before others take them over. That said, well done in a difficult industry. They should also get cameras in the cabins so they can identify those who leave disgusting cars. Give them fines and suspensions / permanent ban = nice cars for the decent people instead of the disrespectful ones.·17.4.From what I understand from them, Aarhus doesn't perform as well as Kbh, so going to even smaller cities, I'm not sure it makes sense at the moment. With self-driving cars, this could easily change as they are less dependent on a new customer being right near where the last customer went, but until then, I can have my doubts. If they are to do something, in my eyes, they should try abroad again, but it requires them to find the right city: -The city should preferably be like Kbh or larger. -There should be many people who don't own a car close to each other. Here, Kbh is ideal as many people cycle and use public transport. -There shouldn't be too much competition already that pushes prices down and makes it difficult to acquire customers (why switch to GreenM if you already use others you are satisfied with). Conversely, it also takes many years to teach a population to use shared cars instead of owning their own cars, so it can easily take 5 years with a deficit before they get a profit if they start in an untried city. From my perspective, the ideal scenario is that a city with a good cycling culture (e.g., in Holland) has a car-sharing company that doesn't make money (which applies to many of them) and that gives up/goes bankrupt, where GREENM can then come in from the sidelines and take over the entire customer base and build upon that. But that kind of thing is very dependent on timing. They tried something similar before they chose to give up abroad, but it was somewhat spoiled by Covid-19.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 230 | - | - | ||
| 82 | - | - | ||
| 300 | - | - | ||
| 12 | - | - | ||
| 26 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 3 495 | 3 495 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 3 495 | 3 495 | 0 | 0 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 14.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
10 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H1 -tulosraportti 14.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·22.4.Interestingly enough, the general meeting has given management authorization to buy shares for 50 million DKK until 2031, among other things with the possibility to cancel them. The CEO has stated several times that he is in favor of share buybacks when the solvency ratio is over 20%, which it reached in connection with Q4. It is important that the solvency ratio remains over 20% as it significantly impacts borrowing opportunities, including leasing of new cars, so we should not expect massive buybacks, but my primary scenario is now that the company will buy back shares for 5-10 million DKK this year. Not enough to make a huge difference, but a nice supplement to the expected growth.·2 t sittenRight now, the chart is probably just following its pattern. Maybe it needs to go all the way down to 65 before it starts to move up again.·1 t sittenIn this context, I am now also thinking more 3+ years than 10 years. But if one wants to realize the profit before the share buybacks start, it is of course less optimal. (I myself am in my 40s so I have okay time).
- ·17.4.Less wild today :-(·17.4.Thanks for the info. For a new investor like me (approx. 2.5 years), such knowledge sharing is great.·17.4.You're welcome. Just remember that I, like everyone else here, am a stranger on an internet forum whom you don't know much about, so always critically evaluate everyone's posts. Some, like me (and you), choose to share our portfolios, which makes it possible to seem like we have reason to have bias due to an investment and whether we know enough about the market to be able to generate a reasonable return, but in the end, one should always evaluate our arguments. In that light, I will elaborate on what I wrote above: There are fundamentally two ways to make money on stocks: By the company developing and making money and therefore becoming more valuable, and by hoping to buy too cheap and sell too expensive because those you trade with misjudge the stock. The first is almost guaranteed to happen if one holds a broad selection of stocks for a long time. The second requires that one understands the stocks one trades with (or the market psychology around them) better than those one trades with, because one must always remember that if one buys a stock too cheap, others must have sold too cheap. Furthermore, every time you buy and sell, both you and the person you trade with pay brokerage fees and perhaps also tax. This means that not only does someone win and someone else lose every time, but if you add the gain and the loss together, you both end up having lost money on the trade due to brokerage fees and tax. You therefore have to be significantly better than the market to actually make money by trading, while you have to be much worse than the market to lose money by buying a broad selection of stocks and holding them for a long time. That being said, the potential gain from constantly trading is greater than from holding stocks for a long time, and this tempts many to gamble with trades rather than holding the stocks instead of investing in them.
- ·16.4.Wild development today!·17.4.However, I think their CEO is extremely likable and has a lot of experience behind them - Has a price target of 50kr and hopes to be able to buy in there.·17.4.I have primarily used them for family moves and here cleanliness didn't matter that much either, so it wasn't something I was super focused on, but as I said, I would also rather look at the development in revenue than at my few own experiences. And for me, the secret behind my good return is largely to hold my shares for a long time and diversify quite a bit. I have also accounted for this in another post above.
- ·16.4.Find it a bit unambitious that expansion to more cities is not being considered, despite them having failed before. Odense must have potential. As well as the world. They should hire a globetrotter like me to scout demand, regulation, parking options etc. in European cities before others take them over. That said, well done in a difficult industry. They should also get cameras in the cabins so they can identify those who leave disgusting cars. Give them fines and suspensions / permanent ban = nice cars for the decent people instead of the disrespectful ones.·17.4.From what I understand from them, Aarhus doesn't perform as well as Kbh, so going to even smaller cities, I'm not sure it makes sense at the moment. With self-driving cars, this could easily change as they are less dependent on a new customer being right near where the last customer went, but until then, I can have my doubts. If they are to do something, in my eyes, they should try abroad again, but it requires them to find the right city: -The city should preferably be like Kbh or larger. -There should be many people who don't own a car close to each other. Here, Kbh is ideal as many people cycle and use public transport. -There shouldn't be too much competition already that pushes prices down and makes it difficult to acquire customers (why switch to GreenM if you already use others you are satisfied with). Conversely, it also takes many years to teach a population to use shared cars instead of owning their own cars, so it can easily take 5 years with a deficit before they get a profit if they start in an untried city. From my perspective, the ideal scenario is that a city with a good cycling culture (e.g., in Holland) has a car-sharing company that doesn't make money (which applies to many of them) and that gives up/goes bankrupt, where GREENM can then come in from the sidelines and take over the entire customer base and build upon that. But that kind of thing is very dependent on timing. They tried something similar before they chose to give up abroad, but it was somewhat spoiled by Covid-19.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 230 | - | - | ||
| 82 | - | - | ||
| 300 | - | - | ||
| 12 | - | - | ||
| 26 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 3 495 | 3 495 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 3 495 | 3 495 | 0 | 0 |