2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
81 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.7. | 2 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
8 t sittenWhy the sudden drop?
They have issued a downgrade (see news). Personally, I think it's an overreaction: yes, they are downgrading top-line guidance but maintaining their EBITDA guidance. It is naturally negative, but they are still guiding for 5-9% top-line growth this year, which most companies can only dream of, and their 112% bottom-line growth is really, really impressive - especially since it is now compared to a period where their focus on Copenhagen was implemented. Part of that growth is due to initiatives from last year, so unfortunately we probably won't see the same rates in H2, but even less would be acceptable. I think it's mostly a reaction to greenm having gone from upgrading 4 times last year to downgrading once so far this year, and that creates some nervousness. That said, they mention 4 things that went wrong and still maintain EBITDA guidance, which strengthens my belief that their original guidance was probably a bit conservative and that there could have been room for an upgrade of it if fewer things had gone wrong.
·2.7.Now I have tried to buy into this one. All the numbers look good to me - but I have a single hypothesis that I want to hear what you think about? What can GM do that Google, Tesla or Uber cannot just go in and do?They already have the customers, they already have data on where and how the cars should be distributed at different times of day/year and they have experience maintaining a free-floating fleet in Copenhagen. Yes, some already have some of it and all of that is naturally something a competitor can learn/build up but it will take years to match GreenM and the question is whether it wouldn't be better to buy GreenM and gain a head start on the other international competitors? GreenM has competed with several other significantly larger companies and in DK, GreenM has currently won every time. That's not to say they can't lose in the future and that a large international company beats them in connection with the transition to self-driving cars is also what I see as the biggest risk in the case.
·30.6. · MuokattuReally mamge freemobility trips lately! Among others from Bryggen and Hedegaardsvej. What's the point? How are we supposed to make money by letting people drive for free for a whole hour and on top of that give them 100 top-up kroner? It's perfectly fine that they park where they do, there are surely massere who will gladly pay for the trip from Bryggen later after they've enjoyed themselves and after the national matches they're watching there. Just don't understand it. Hope it's due to an automatic, but flawed system, that does it because mamge cars are in the area. It then doesn't understand the dynamics and what people are doing in Kbh, but perhaps just relies on previously unreliable data. Otherwise, it's just me who doesn't understand it. Just my 2 Cents rage.- ·29.6.Do you think they earn a lot from so many people taking cars to Roskilde Festival? I experience the city very empty of cars and wonder if they even earn anything from, for example, the flat 249 dkk package for Roskilde they have running VS having cars in Kbh, which are used 2-3 times per day. I think they must be standing very still in Roskilde for that week and I can see they have insanely many freemobility cars from Roskilde now, so if people also use that offer, they lose further earnings from those trips as well as the 100 top up kroner they get for the freemobility trip.I generally believe they know what they are doing. They generally have lower turnover on their cars during the summer holiday period than outside of it, so for that reason alone it can make sense even if they earn less than they would on a car in Copenhagen outside the holiday period. Furthermore, it can also be a good way to introduce new people to the concept, and once they have registered in the system, they are more likely to use it in the future.
- ·16.6. · MuokattuIt's a bit strange that there is no recommendation for this company here on NN. Is it because the company is a very niche-oriented business, and the wise oracle-men don't dare to say anything?
I always start with the chart. If there has been activity in it, and it has been steadily moving upwards for a while. Yes, then I take a closer look at it.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
81 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 8 t sittenWhy the sudden drop?They have issued a downgrade (see news). Personally, I think it's an overreaction: yes, they are downgrading top-line guidance but maintaining their EBITDA guidance. It is naturally negative, but they are still guiding for 5-9% top-line growth this year, which most companies can only dream of, and their 112% bottom-line growth is really, really impressive - especially since it is now compared to a period where their focus on Copenhagen was implemented. Part of that growth is due to initiatives from last year, so unfortunately we probably won't see the same rates in H2, but even less would be acceptable. I think it's mostly a reaction to greenm having gone from upgrading 4 times last year to downgrading once so far this year, and that creates some nervousness. That said, they mention 4 things that went wrong and still maintain EBITDA guidance, which strengthens my belief that their original guidance was probably a bit conservative and that there could have been room for an upgrade of it if fewer things had gone wrong.
- ·2.7.Now I have tried to buy into this one. All the numbers look good to me - but I have a single hypothesis that I want to hear what you think about? What can GM do that Google, Tesla or Uber cannot just go in and do?They already have the customers, they already have data on where and how the cars should be distributed at different times of day/year and they have experience maintaining a free-floating fleet in Copenhagen. Yes, some already have some of it and all of that is naturally something a competitor can learn/build up but it will take years to match GreenM and the question is whether it wouldn't be better to buy GreenM and gain a head start on the other international competitors? GreenM has competed with several other significantly larger companies and in DK, GreenM has currently won every time. That's not to say they can't lose in the future and that a large international company beats them in connection with the transition to self-driving cars is also what I see as the biggest risk in the case.
- ·30.6. · MuokattuReally mamge freemobility trips lately! Among others from Bryggen and Hedegaardsvej. What's the point? How are we supposed to make money by letting people drive for free for a whole hour and on top of that give them 100 top-up kroner? It's perfectly fine that they park where they do, there are surely massere who will gladly pay for the trip from Bryggen later after they've enjoyed themselves and after the national matches they're watching there. Just don't understand it. Hope it's due to an automatic, but flawed system, that does it because mamge cars are in the area. It then doesn't understand the dynamics and what people are doing in Kbh, but perhaps just relies on previously unreliable data. Otherwise, it's just me who doesn't understand it. Just my 2 Cents rage.
- ·29.6.Do you think they earn a lot from so many people taking cars to Roskilde Festival? I experience the city very empty of cars and wonder if they even earn anything from, for example, the flat 249 dkk package for Roskilde they have running VS having cars in Kbh, which are used 2-3 times per day. I think they must be standing very still in Roskilde for that week and I can see they have insanely many freemobility cars from Roskilde now, so if people also use that offer, they lose further earnings from those trips as well as the 100 top up kroner they get for the freemobility trip.I generally believe they know what they are doing. They generally have lower turnover on their cars during the summer holiday period than outside of it, so for that reason alone it can make sense even if they earn less than they would on a car in Copenhagen outside the holiday period. Furthermore, it can also be a good way to introduce new people to the concept, and once they have registered in the system, they are more likely to use it in the future.
- ·16.6. · MuokattuIt's a bit strange that there is no recommendation for this company here on NN. Is it because the company is a very niche-oriented business, and the wise oracle-men don't dare to say anything?I always start with the chart. If there has been activity in it, and it has been steadily moving upwards for a while. Yes, then I take a closer look at it.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.7. | 2 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
81 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 9.7. | 2 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 17.4. | ||
2025 H2 -tulosraportti 24.3. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 19.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 10.10.2025 | ||
2025 H1 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 8 t sittenWhy the sudden drop?They have issued a downgrade (see news). Personally, I think it's an overreaction: yes, they are downgrading top-line guidance but maintaining their EBITDA guidance. It is naturally negative, but they are still guiding for 5-9% top-line growth this year, which most companies can only dream of, and their 112% bottom-line growth is really, really impressive - especially since it is now compared to a period where their focus on Copenhagen was implemented. Part of that growth is due to initiatives from last year, so unfortunately we probably won't see the same rates in H2, but even less would be acceptable. I think it's mostly a reaction to greenm having gone from upgrading 4 times last year to downgrading once so far this year, and that creates some nervousness. That said, they mention 4 things that went wrong and still maintain EBITDA guidance, which strengthens my belief that their original guidance was probably a bit conservative and that there could have been room for an upgrade of it if fewer things had gone wrong.
- ·2.7.Now I have tried to buy into this one. All the numbers look good to me - but I have a single hypothesis that I want to hear what you think about? What can GM do that Google, Tesla or Uber cannot just go in and do?They already have the customers, they already have data on where and how the cars should be distributed at different times of day/year and they have experience maintaining a free-floating fleet in Copenhagen. Yes, some already have some of it and all of that is naturally something a competitor can learn/build up but it will take years to match GreenM and the question is whether it wouldn't be better to buy GreenM and gain a head start on the other international competitors? GreenM has competed with several other significantly larger companies and in DK, GreenM has currently won every time. That's not to say they can't lose in the future and that a large international company beats them in connection with the transition to self-driving cars is also what I see as the biggest risk in the case.
- ·30.6. · MuokattuReally mamge freemobility trips lately! Among others from Bryggen and Hedegaardsvej. What's the point? How are we supposed to make money by letting people drive for free for a whole hour and on top of that give them 100 top-up kroner? It's perfectly fine that they park where they do, there are surely massere who will gladly pay for the trip from Bryggen later after they've enjoyed themselves and after the national matches they're watching there. Just don't understand it. Hope it's due to an automatic, but flawed system, that does it because mamge cars are in the area. It then doesn't understand the dynamics and what people are doing in Kbh, but perhaps just relies on previously unreliable data. Otherwise, it's just me who doesn't understand it. Just my 2 Cents rage.
- ·29.6.Do you think they earn a lot from so many people taking cars to Roskilde Festival? I experience the city very empty of cars and wonder if they even earn anything from, for example, the flat 249 dkk package for Roskilde they have running VS having cars in Kbh, which are used 2-3 times per day. I think they must be standing very still in Roskilde for that week and I can see they have insanely many freemobility cars from Roskilde now, so if people also use that offer, they lose further earnings from those trips as well as the 100 top up kroner they get for the freemobility trip.I generally believe they know what they are doing. They generally have lower turnover on their cars during the summer holiday period than outside of it, so for that reason alone it can make sense even if they earn less than they would on a car in Copenhagen outside the holiday period. Furthermore, it can also be a good way to introduce new people to the concept, and once they have registered in the system, they are more likely to use it in the future.
- ·16.6. · MuokattuIt's a bit strange that there is no recommendation for this company here on NN. Is it because the company is a very niche-oriented business, and the wise oracle-men don't dare to say anything?I always start with the chart. If there has been activity in it, and it has been steadily moving upwards for a while. Yes, then I take a closer look at it.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt