2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
2 päivää sitten
‧24 min
33,5905 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 19.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 13.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·6 t sittenWhat I struggle to understand is how this can be negative. 1. Have the Belgians bought 18% through a holding company, which means they won't get influence anyway, as the other owners are aligned and hold almost 2/3 of the votes. Then they should have received a discount. If they had owned 18% publicly and the Grieg familien had owned 33%, they would have had other opportunities to gain a majority. 2. If the Belgians have secured control through shareholder agreements, why would the Grieg familien invite them into the holding company at all? They could have sold down their stake in GSF directly and still maintained control over their own holding company. 3. If GSF wants to grow further with acquisitions/mergers, they must get the stock prices up. The low book value of concessions means that large borrowings will lead to high interest rates; a merger should require GSF to have a share price that reflects fundamental conditions. Acquisitions with settlement in shares will also depend on the "correct" share price, or they won't be able to buy for the "correct" price. Could it be that this Belgian company is taking on the role of increasing the share price through price support and a desire for a higher ownership stake? If they first conducted due dilligesns and found real values that make buying at nok 47,5 favorable, how can they then be buying more at under nok 35? I can't imagine that the price won't have to come up significantly now, and preferably over 50. Where are the analysts? Pareto probably set their target at 47,5 because they also calculated that was the price the Belgians paid, but shouldn't one see that they must have received a "discount" and that they see greater values than what they are paying for? Ergo, the price target should have been even higher. Are they buying at 47,5 and hoping to get 47,5 back in 4-5 years 🙃
·6 t sittenI would have liked to be bought out at 47.5kr too.. like the other half of the Grieg family..not fair.- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuNow this suddenly becomes exciting to follow in the weeks ahead🤩
·1 päivä sittenThe concessions are the great hidden value GSF has - 19 sea sites/licenses in Rogaland, with a total of 17,800 tonnes MAB. Of this, 12,340 tonnes are ordinary concessions and 5,460 tonnes are special concessions. Grieg himself has made a market-based valuation of these. They use recent auctions/transactions in PO2 and arrive at an implicit value of approx. 4.6 billion kroner for the Rogaland concessions. That corresponds to: 4.6 billion / 17,800 tonnes MAB = approx. 258,000 kr per tonne MAB Concession value per share With approximately 113.45 million shares, that gives: 4.6 billion / 113.45m = 40.5 kr per share The concessions alone thus correspond to around 40 kr/share according to this market-based method This is extracted from Chatgpt
If the value of the licenses alone is worth 4.6 billion, new owners have made a good deal. With stable good operation without major incidents like in April and one-off costs, this will be good in the somewhat longer term. Now new owners are coming in who have invested 1 billion equivalent to 47.5 per share for approx 18.8% of the company and see a potential. I believe and hope we will see a Grieg with a completely different mcap in 2-3 years. For that reason, I will remain invested. I don't understand those who sell at the bottom. But that's me.
·1 päivä sittenWith this volume, I reckon it's short covering that's happening. This also speaks for it when we see the development over the last 45 min.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
2 päivää sitten
‧24 min
33,5905 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenWhat I struggle to understand is how this can be negative. 1. Have the Belgians bought 18% through a holding company, which means they won't get influence anyway, as the other owners are aligned and hold almost 2/3 of the votes. Then they should have received a discount. If they had owned 18% publicly and the Grieg familien had owned 33%, they would have had other opportunities to gain a majority. 2. If the Belgians have secured control through shareholder agreements, why would the Grieg familien invite them into the holding company at all? They could have sold down their stake in GSF directly and still maintained control over their own holding company. 3. If GSF wants to grow further with acquisitions/mergers, they must get the stock prices up. The low book value of concessions means that large borrowings will lead to high interest rates; a merger should require GSF to have a share price that reflects fundamental conditions. Acquisitions with settlement in shares will also depend on the "correct" share price, or they won't be able to buy for the "correct" price. Could it be that this Belgian company is taking on the role of increasing the share price through price support and a desire for a higher ownership stake? If they first conducted due dilligesns and found real values that make buying at nok 47,5 favorable, how can they then be buying more at under nok 35? I can't imagine that the price won't have to come up significantly now, and preferably over 50. Where are the analysts? Pareto probably set their target at 47,5 because they also calculated that was the price the Belgians paid, but shouldn't one see that they must have received a "discount" and that they see greater values than what they are paying for? Ergo, the price target should have been even higher. Are they buying at 47,5 and hoping to get 47,5 back in 4-5 years 🙃
- ·6 t sittenI would have liked to be bought out at 47.5kr too.. like the other half of the Grieg family..not fair.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuNow this suddenly becomes exciting to follow in the weeks ahead🤩
- ·1 päivä sittenThe concessions are the great hidden value GSF has - 19 sea sites/licenses in Rogaland, with a total of 17,800 tonnes MAB. Of this, 12,340 tonnes are ordinary concessions and 5,460 tonnes are special concessions. Grieg himself has made a market-based valuation of these. They use recent auctions/transactions in PO2 and arrive at an implicit value of approx. 4.6 billion kroner for the Rogaland concessions. That corresponds to: 4.6 billion / 17,800 tonnes MAB = approx. 258,000 kr per tonne MAB Concession value per share With approximately 113.45 million shares, that gives: 4.6 billion / 113.45m = 40.5 kr per share The concessions alone thus correspond to around 40 kr/share according to this market-based method This is extracted from ChatgptIf the value of the licenses alone is worth 4.6 billion, new owners have made a good deal. With stable good operation without major incidents like in April and one-off costs, this will be good in the somewhat longer term. Now new owners are coming in who have invested 1 billion equivalent to 47.5 per share for approx 18.8% of the company and see a potential. I believe and hope we will see a Grieg with a completely different mcap in 2-3 years. For that reason, I will remain invested. I don't understand those who sell at the bottom. But that's me.
- ·1 päivä sittenWith this volume, I reckon it's short covering that's happening. This also speaks for it when we see the development over the last 45 min.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 19.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 13.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
2 päivää sitten
‧24 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 19.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 13.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 |
33,5905 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenWhat I struggle to understand is how this can be negative. 1. Have the Belgians bought 18% through a holding company, which means they won't get influence anyway, as the other owners are aligned and hold almost 2/3 of the votes. Then they should have received a discount. If they had owned 18% publicly and the Grieg familien had owned 33%, they would have had other opportunities to gain a majority. 2. If the Belgians have secured control through shareholder agreements, why would the Grieg familien invite them into the holding company at all? They could have sold down their stake in GSF directly and still maintained control over their own holding company. 3. If GSF wants to grow further with acquisitions/mergers, they must get the stock prices up. The low book value of concessions means that large borrowings will lead to high interest rates; a merger should require GSF to have a share price that reflects fundamental conditions. Acquisitions with settlement in shares will also depend on the "correct" share price, or they won't be able to buy for the "correct" price. Could it be that this Belgian company is taking on the role of increasing the share price through price support and a desire for a higher ownership stake? If they first conducted due dilligesns and found real values that make buying at nok 47,5 favorable, how can they then be buying more at under nok 35? I can't imagine that the price won't have to come up significantly now, and preferably over 50. Where are the analysts? Pareto probably set their target at 47,5 because they also calculated that was the price the Belgians paid, but shouldn't one see that they must have received a "discount" and that they see greater values than what they are paying for? Ergo, the price target should have been even higher. Are they buying at 47,5 and hoping to get 47,5 back in 4-5 years 🙃
- ·6 t sittenI would have liked to be bought out at 47.5kr too.. like the other half of the Grieg family..not fair.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuNow this suddenly becomes exciting to follow in the weeks ahead🤩
- ·1 päivä sittenThe concessions are the great hidden value GSF has - 19 sea sites/licenses in Rogaland, with a total of 17,800 tonnes MAB. Of this, 12,340 tonnes are ordinary concessions and 5,460 tonnes are special concessions. Grieg himself has made a market-based valuation of these. They use recent auctions/transactions in PO2 and arrive at an implicit value of approx. 4.6 billion kroner for the Rogaland concessions. That corresponds to: 4.6 billion / 17,800 tonnes MAB = approx. 258,000 kr per tonne MAB Concession value per share With approximately 113.45 million shares, that gives: 4.6 billion / 113.45m = 40.5 kr per share The concessions alone thus correspond to around 40 kr/share according to this market-based method This is extracted from ChatgptIf the value of the licenses alone is worth 4.6 billion, new owners have made a good deal. With stable good operation without major incidents like in April and one-off costs, this will be good in the somewhat longer term. Now new owners are coming in who have invested 1 billion equivalent to 47.5 per share for approx 18.8% of the company and see a potential. I believe and hope we will see a Grieg with a completely different mcap in 2-3 years. For that reason, I will remain invested. I don't understand those who sell at the bottom. But that's me.
- ·1 päivä sittenWith this volume, I reckon it's short covering that's happening. This also speaks for it when we see the development over the last 45 min.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt