2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
41 päivää sitten
‧18 min
Tarjoustasot
First North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | - | - | ||
| 509 | - | - | ||
| 15 | - | - | ||
| 570 | - | - | ||
| 1 086 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 409 866 | 409 866 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 409 866 | 409 866 | 0 | 0 |
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 29.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 28.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·6 t sittenThe KPI, it should come soon, very likely this week! I have no idea what the Basis perf and AUM increase will be….BUT for sure, that the KPI didn't come today 11/5 doesn't mean they are bad figures! That's just overinterpretation now that everyone is nervous! March and April will be similar! April: - Basis up 0.4-0.5 would be extremely good in this climate. Up 0.6-1.0 would be enormously impressive. I believe and hope for 0.5 - AUM is difficult, hope we don't see withdrawals. If we get 5% which I believe, then this is very good! Between 5-10% would be great. If "these 20M" don't come now either..so what, then they will come later! However, I think it was clumsily communicated. - Pipe might have increased 20-25M..pipe is not as sensitive If we get this I'm super happy: - Basis 0.5 up - AUM 5M up - Pipe 20M up
·1 t sittenNot everyone is nervous. Mostly just some fools who are badmouthing the forums with a lot of crap, frankly :)
·7 t sittenYou write the longest texts about how good this is but the facts are that it has fallen constantly for a very long time and pretty much does so every single day. Probably my worst investment so far apart from Fisker. Why are people so confident or is it just a handful of optimists or someone with something at stake.
·2 t sittenI strongly agree. It seems like people either bought the crap for 1,- or that they are bots with stakes in Hilbert, But yes, I went in with 30k and they have become 13k in four months.
·2 päivää sittenHere is a slightly longer post that I think many will be interested in reading. First, I recommend reading the post and the discussion published by Danlars (it's right below this one). There are good discussions there showing that there are several different opinions about the company, its valuation, and what AUM has actually come in for the 2-20 model. It's good to have discussions about such things. For my part, I believe that stocks should be priced at least one year into the future and will therefore show my calculation for why I conclude that the pricing should have been different from today's. The most important thing for the company is to grow AUM. And yes, I agree that a %-wise increase of an unknown number gives us nothing to relate to. But (!), the company has published its pipeline in total AUM for the 2-20 model, and it is over 330 MUSD. This gives us a basis for calculation. The pipeline does not apply to Syntetika and has an average time of 9mths before the capital is allocated. It can take both longer and shorter time, but this is what the company estimates. I believe Hilbert currently has approximately 100MUSD. That is my assessment, and we will get the answer when the Q1 report comes out in a few weeks. If they manage 60% of their pipeline (approx. 200MUSD) by the end of 2026, then they will have 300MUSD under management for the entire year 2027. 60% allows for some to withdraw, some to postpone until later, and for management to have been too optimistic with 330MUSD. OBS! Here, it is converted from USD to SEK. A 2% management fee on this yields 60M SEK in revenue. This is around what Hilbert itself believes is enough to finance the company, and that is before performance fee. This is important so that the company's survival is not dependent on performance, but rather has operations that run even if bad times come. With a performance of 10-25%, they will receive an additional 2-5%, i.e., 60-150M SEK in additional revenue. At today's share price, this would mean that the company is valued at a future earning of between P/E 3,5-8 based on the difference in performance. Stocks with such potential as Hilbert has, should have been priced at a P/E between 20-40 in my opinion. That would correspond to around 20 SEK per share, and I believe that is "fair value", neither overpriced nor cheap. To emphasize my point and bring in what Danlars has discussed about Syntetika, I want to stress that this calculation is based on figures that do not include Syntetika. If the platform is delayed even more, I don't think it should affect the share price because it is mathematically already calculated as 0 (given that one does not believe it will become a cost sink). I view Syntetika as an AUM option that can bring much more AUM under management, but for now, it is not something that "must" be in place. The traditional management can justify much more than today's valuation. For those of you who are not so fond of calculating or want to change some numbers and see what it does to the price per share, I recommend copying the post into ChatGPT and having it show the potential of the stock. The numbers are approximate because almost everything is based on estimates, and therefore there won't be much point in going down to decimal places. Feel free to comment if you have other viewpoints. I would like to hear what others think.
·9 t sitten · MuokattuBe a bit wary of the 1 krone far down there. A disappointment at the end of May and this crashes. Purely technically, there are no support levels before 1.5 kr if 3.8 is broken. I wouldn't bet a single krone on the support level holding. Pull the orders down
·3 päivää sittenI've taken another journey through my own notes and quarterly reports over the last year, and looked specifically at Syntetika, and the company: Broadly, it seems like retail is utterly fed up with waiting for this exciting product that was supposed to be launched first in September 2025 (ref Q2 report and PR with roadmap from 16 May 2025), in the Q3 report it said launch Q1 2026, and now at Q4 it says Q2 launch. The same is repeated: everything is ready, pipeline Syntetika 250 musd (ref Q3 report). This has also been talked up and up in various podcasts as "potentially stratospheric". That's all well and good, but where is the hype? And before it's mentioned "it has to happen at the right time", "crypto winter", "the stars must be aligned" etc... What about an actual, sober update on it from the company, which provides the conditions for launch, why it has been postponed for so long. I would personally have "bought" that much more than postponements and repeated launch dates that don't happen. It fits into a long series of poor and misleading information strongly characterized by hype beyond the company's PR (various podcasts and more). Beyond Syntetika, I found "expected inflow" of 60 musd (2/20) AUM from Q2 2025 (with a conversion window of 3 months). I don't quite find that this matches revenues, so I assume this didn't fully materialize, and had it been, with the KPI % increases we have seen from October 2025 to date, AUM at 2/20 should have been over 230 musd. So something has happened/not happened here. Good to keep in mind that not everything goes according to plan, and in a startup, that's fine. But it makes good sense that they are not providing any absolute AUM figures yet. They do not reflect what has been previously communicated, and are probably quite a way from break even. I think. The share price seems retail-driven, and there are certainly several who have dived a bit deeper into the matter, who are also, to put it bluntly, sick and tired of this waiting for break even, Syntetika and more. It's great with a CIO who shoots from the hip and hypes things up, but it should be backed by facts and good figures, not just narrative, because that's getting old. It was also mentioned by the same guy that AUM with absolute figures (from the podcast Noterat) will become visible "after the Q1 report", to quote. So we'll see if they manage to deliver on at least that, or if it becomes yet another statement that gets postponed, and again joins the ranks of poor communication. Long rant, or "analysis", as some might call it, this here. Currently little hard facts to buy/sell on, but the lack of absolutes and postponements is information, too. And just to emphasize: an increase in % is not impressive, unless there is an absolute figure at the base one can calculate with. Had the absolute been close to break even, it would probably have been reported quite quickly in the market, if they follow previously hyped communication?! Hilbert has a lot to prove and deliver, and they should start doing that quite soon. I'm betting they focus exclusively on delivery, now that the platform is fully built. Too many moving parts are not necessarily good, no matter how great the potential is in each part. Thoughts?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
41 päivää sitten
‧18 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenThe KPI, it should come soon, very likely this week! I have no idea what the Basis perf and AUM increase will be….BUT for sure, that the KPI didn't come today 11/5 doesn't mean they are bad figures! That's just overinterpretation now that everyone is nervous! March and April will be similar! April: - Basis up 0.4-0.5 would be extremely good in this climate. Up 0.6-1.0 would be enormously impressive. I believe and hope for 0.5 - AUM is difficult, hope we don't see withdrawals. If we get 5% which I believe, then this is very good! Between 5-10% would be great. If "these 20M" don't come now either..so what, then they will come later! However, I think it was clumsily communicated. - Pipe might have increased 20-25M..pipe is not as sensitive If we get this I'm super happy: - Basis 0.5 up - AUM 5M up - Pipe 20M up·1 t sittenNot everyone is nervous. Mostly just some fools who are badmouthing the forums with a lot of crap, frankly :)
- ·7 t sittenYou write the longest texts about how good this is but the facts are that it has fallen constantly for a very long time and pretty much does so every single day. Probably my worst investment so far apart from Fisker. Why are people so confident or is it just a handful of optimists or someone with something at stake.·2 t sittenI strongly agree. It seems like people either bought the crap for 1,- or that they are bots with stakes in Hilbert, But yes, I went in with 30k and they have become 13k in four months.
- ·2 päivää sittenHere is a slightly longer post that I think many will be interested in reading. First, I recommend reading the post and the discussion published by Danlars (it's right below this one). There are good discussions there showing that there are several different opinions about the company, its valuation, and what AUM has actually come in for the 2-20 model. It's good to have discussions about such things. For my part, I believe that stocks should be priced at least one year into the future and will therefore show my calculation for why I conclude that the pricing should have been different from today's. The most important thing for the company is to grow AUM. And yes, I agree that a %-wise increase of an unknown number gives us nothing to relate to. But (!), the company has published its pipeline in total AUM for the 2-20 model, and it is over 330 MUSD. This gives us a basis for calculation. The pipeline does not apply to Syntetika and has an average time of 9mths before the capital is allocated. It can take both longer and shorter time, but this is what the company estimates. I believe Hilbert currently has approximately 100MUSD. That is my assessment, and we will get the answer when the Q1 report comes out in a few weeks. If they manage 60% of their pipeline (approx. 200MUSD) by the end of 2026, then they will have 300MUSD under management for the entire year 2027. 60% allows for some to withdraw, some to postpone until later, and for management to have been too optimistic with 330MUSD. OBS! Here, it is converted from USD to SEK. A 2% management fee on this yields 60M SEK in revenue. This is around what Hilbert itself believes is enough to finance the company, and that is before performance fee. This is important so that the company's survival is not dependent on performance, but rather has operations that run even if bad times come. With a performance of 10-25%, they will receive an additional 2-5%, i.e., 60-150M SEK in additional revenue. At today's share price, this would mean that the company is valued at a future earning of between P/E 3,5-8 based on the difference in performance. Stocks with such potential as Hilbert has, should have been priced at a P/E between 20-40 in my opinion. That would correspond to around 20 SEK per share, and I believe that is "fair value", neither overpriced nor cheap. To emphasize my point and bring in what Danlars has discussed about Syntetika, I want to stress that this calculation is based on figures that do not include Syntetika. If the platform is delayed even more, I don't think it should affect the share price because it is mathematically already calculated as 0 (given that one does not believe it will become a cost sink). I view Syntetika as an AUM option that can bring much more AUM under management, but for now, it is not something that "must" be in place. The traditional management can justify much more than today's valuation. For those of you who are not so fond of calculating or want to change some numbers and see what it does to the price per share, I recommend copying the post into ChatGPT and having it show the potential of the stock. The numbers are approximate because almost everything is based on estimates, and therefore there won't be much point in going down to decimal places. Feel free to comment if you have other viewpoints. I would like to hear what others think.·9 t sitten · MuokattuBe a bit wary of the 1 krone far down there. A disappointment at the end of May and this crashes. Purely technically, there are no support levels before 1.5 kr if 3.8 is broken. I wouldn't bet a single krone on the support level holding. Pull the orders down
- ·3 päivää sittenI've taken another journey through my own notes and quarterly reports over the last year, and looked specifically at Syntetika, and the company: Broadly, it seems like retail is utterly fed up with waiting for this exciting product that was supposed to be launched first in September 2025 (ref Q2 report and PR with roadmap from 16 May 2025), in the Q3 report it said launch Q1 2026, and now at Q4 it says Q2 launch. The same is repeated: everything is ready, pipeline Syntetika 250 musd (ref Q3 report). This has also been talked up and up in various podcasts as "potentially stratospheric". That's all well and good, but where is the hype? And before it's mentioned "it has to happen at the right time", "crypto winter", "the stars must be aligned" etc... What about an actual, sober update on it from the company, which provides the conditions for launch, why it has been postponed for so long. I would personally have "bought" that much more than postponements and repeated launch dates that don't happen. It fits into a long series of poor and misleading information strongly characterized by hype beyond the company's PR (various podcasts and more). Beyond Syntetika, I found "expected inflow" of 60 musd (2/20) AUM from Q2 2025 (with a conversion window of 3 months). I don't quite find that this matches revenues, so I assume this didn't fully materialize, and had it been, with the KPI % increases we have seen from October 2025 to date, AUM at 2/20 should have been over 230 musd. So something has happened/not happened here. Good to keep in mind that not everything goes according to plan, and in a startup, that's fine. But it makes good sense that they are not providing any absolute AUM figures yet. They do not reflect what has been previously communicated, and are probably quite a way from break even. I think. The share price seems retail-driven, and there are certainly several who have dived a bit deeper into the matter, who are also, to put it bluntly, sick and tired of this waiting for break even, Syntetika and more. It's great with a CIO who shoots from the hip and hypes things up, but it should be backed by facts and good figures, not just narrative, because that's getting old. It was also mentioned by the same guy that AUM with absolute figures (from the podcast Noterat) will become visible "after the Q1 report", to quote. So we'll see if they manage to deliver on at least that, or if it becomes yet another statement that gets postponed, and again joins the ranks of poor communication. Long rant, or "analysis", as some might call it, this here. Currently little hard facts to buy/sell on, but the lack of absolutes and postponements is information, too. And just to emphasize: an increase in % is not impressive, unless there is an absolute figure at the base one can calculate with. Had the absolute been close to break even, it would probably have been reported quite quickly in the market, if they follow previously hyped communication?! Hilbert has a lot to prove and deliver, and they should start doing that quite soon. I'm betting they focus exclusively on delivery, now that the platform is fully built. Too many moving parts are not necessarily good, no matter how great the potential is in each part. Thoughts?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | - | - | ||
| 509 | - | - | ||
| 15 | - | - | ||
| 570 | - | - | ||
| 1 086 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 409 866 | 409 866 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 409 866 | 409 866 | 0 | 0 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 29.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 28.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
41 päivää sitten
‧18 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 29.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 30.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 28.2.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenThe KPI, it should come soon, very likely this week! I have no idea what the Basis perf and AUM increase will be….BUT for sure, that the KPI didn't come today 11/5 doesn't mean they are bad figures! That's just overinterpretation now that everyone is nervous! March and April will be similar! April: - Basis up 0.4-0.5 would be extremely good in this climate. Up 0.6-1.0 would be enormously impressive. I believe and hope for 0.5 - AUM is difficult, hope we don't see withdrawals. If we get 5% which I believe, then this is very good! Between 5-10% would be great. If "these 20M" don't come now either..so what, then they will come later! However, I think it was clumsily communicated. - Pipe might have increased 20-25M..pipe is not as sensitive If we get this I'm super happy: - Basis 0.5 up - AUM 5M up - Pipe 20M up·1 t sittenNot everyone is nervous. Mostly just some fools who are badmouthing the forums with a lot of crap, frankly :)
- ·7 t sittenYou write the longest texts about how good this is but the facts are that it has fallen constantly for a very long time and pretty much does so every single day. Probably my worst investment so far apart from Fisker. Why are people so confident or is it just a handful of optimists or someone with something at stake.·2 t sittenI strongly agree. It seems like people either bought the crap for 1,- or that they are bots with stakes in Hilbert, But yes, I went in with 30k and they have become 13k in four months.
- ·2 päivää sittenHere is a slightly longer post that I think many will be interested in reading. First, I recommend reading the post and the discussion published by Danlars (it's right below this one). There are good discussions there showing that there are several different opinions about the company, its valuation, and what AUM has actually come in for the 2-20 model. It's good to have discussions about such things. For my part, I believe that stocks should be priced at least one year into the future and will therefore show my calculation for why I conclude that the pricing should have been different from today's. The most important thing for the company is to grow AUM. And yes, I agree that a %-wise increase of an unknown number gives us nothing to relate to. But (!), the company has published its pipeline in total AUM for the 2-20 model, and it is over 330 MUSD. This gives us a basis for calculation. The pipeline does not apply to Syntetika and has an average time of 9mths before the capital is allocated. It can take both longer and shorter time, but this is what the company estimates. I believe Hilbert currently has approximately 100MUSD. That is my assessment, and we will get the answer when the Q1 report comes out in a few weeks. If they manage 60% of their pipeline (approx. 200MUSD) by the end of 2026, then they will have 300MUSD under management for the entire year 2027. 60% allows for some to withdraw, some to postpone until later, and for management to have been too optimistic with 330MUSD. OBS! Here, it is converted from USD to SEK. A 2% management fee on this yields 60M SEK in revenue. This is around what Hilbert itself believes is enough to finance the company, and that is before performance fee. This is important so that the company's survival is not dependent on performance, but rather has operations that run even if bad times come. With a performance of 10-25%, they will receive an additional 2-5%, i.e., 60-150M SEK in additional revenue. At today's share price, this would mean that the company is valued at a future earning of between P/E 3,5-8 based on the difference in performance. Stocks with such potential as Hilbert has, should have been priced at a P/E between 20-40 in my opinion. That would correspond to around 20 SEK per share, and I believe that is "fair value", neither overpriced nor cheap. To emphasize my point and bring in what Danlars has discussed about Syntetika, I want to stress that this calculation is based on figures that do not include Syntetika. If the platform is delayed even more, I don't think it should affect the share price because it is mathematically already calculated as 0 (given that one does not believe it will become a cost sink). I view Syntetika as an AUM option that can bring much more AUM under management, but for now, it is not something that "must" be in place. The traditional management can justify much more than today's valuation. For those of you who are not so fond of calculating or want to change some numbers and see what it does to the price per share, I recommend copying the post into ChatGPT and having it show the potential of the stock. The numbers are approximate because almost everything is based on estimates, and therefore there won't be much point in going down to decimal places. Feel free to comment if you have other viewpoints. I would like to hear what others think.·9 t sitten · MuokattuBe a bit wary of the 1 krone far down there. A disappointment at the end of May and this crashes. Purely technically, there are no support levels before 1.5 kr if 3.8 is broken. I wouldn't bet a single krone on the support level holding. Pull the orders down
- ·3 päivää sittenI've taken another journey through my own notes and quarterly reports over the last year, and looked specifically at Syntetika, and the company: Broadly, it seems like retail is utterly fed up with waiting for this exciting product that was supposed to be launched first in September 2025 (ref Q2 report and PR with roadmap from 16 May 2025), in the Q3 report it said launch Q1 2026, and now at Q4 it says Q2 launch. The same is repeated: everything is ready, pipeline Syntetika 250 musd (ref Q3 report). This has also been talked up and up in various podcasts as "potentially stratospheric". That's all well and good, but where is the hype? And before it's mentioned "it has to happen at the right time", "crypto winter", "the stars must be aligned" etc... What about an actual, sober update on it from the company, which provides the conditions for launch, why it has been postponed for so long. I would personally have "bought" that much more than postponements and repeated launch dates that don't happen. It fits into a long series of poor and misleading information strongly characterized by hype beyond the company's PR (various podcasts and more). Beyond Syntetika, I found "expected inflow" of 60 musd (2/20) AUM from Q2 2025 (with a conversion window of 3 months). I don't quite find that this matches revenues, so I assume this didn't fully materialize, and had it been, with the KPI % increases we have seen from October 2025 to date, AUM at 2/20 should have been over 230 musd. So something has happened/not happened here. Good to keep in mind that not everything goes according to plan, and in a startup, that's fine. But it makes good sense that they are not providing any absolute AUM figures yet. They do not reflect what has been previously communicated, and are probably quite a way from break even. I think. The share price seems retail-driven, and there are certainly several who have dived a bit deeper into the matter, who are also, to put it bluntly, sick and tired of this waiting for break even, Syntetika and more. It's great with a CIO who shoots from the hip and hypes things up, but it should be backed by facts and good figures, not just narrative, because that's getting old. It was also mentioned by the same guy that AUM with absolute figures (from the podcast Noterat) will become visible "after the Q1 report", to quote. So we'll see if they manage to deliver on at least that, or if it becomes yet another statement that gets postponed, and again joins the ranks of poor communication. Long rant, or "analysis", as some might call it, this here. Currently little hard facts to buy/sell on, but the lack of absolutes and postponements is information, too. And just to emphasize: an increase in % is not impressive, unless there is an absolute figure at the base one can calculate with. Had the absolute been close to break even, it would probably have been reported quite quickly in the market, if they follow previously hyped communication?! Hilbert has a lot to prove and deliver, and they should start doing that quite soon. I'm betting they focus exclusively on delivery, now that the platform is fully built. Too many moving parts are not necessarily good, no matter how great the potential is in each part. Thoughts?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 | - | - | ||
| 509 | - | - | ||
| 15 | - | - | ||
| 570 | - | - | ||
| 1 086 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 409 866 | 409 866 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 409 866 | 409 866 | 0 | 0 |