2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten
‧16 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | - | - | ||
| 6 702 | - | - | ||
| 427 | - | - | ||
| 339 | - | - | ||
| 79 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 30.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 31.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 29.8.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·6 t sittenHilbert Group — Who Should Actually Allocate? I have reviewed the Q2 2026 report from Hilbert Group, and I am left with one overarching question: who should actually allocate to these strategies, and why now? The math starts with Hilbert's annual revenue being around 14 MSEK, while they burn 66 MSEK per year. To close that gap solely with AUM growth and fee scaling, they need either 1.5–2 billion in AUM or a 5–6 percent fee rate. Both are unrealistic. No serious players are willing to pay so much fees on seed classes. Hilbert's argument is that "institutional allocators" are investing. But who are these? They mention Helena Global, which is a venture fund that invests in their shares, not in the strategies. They mention a "crypto-native foundation" that allocated USD 10 million. That's it. I see no tier-1 European pension funds, no American endowments, no sovereign wealth funds. I don't even see established hedge-of-funds that would normally go through three to five years of track record before allocating. AUM growth of 136 percent in Q1 and 8.5 percent in Q2 — where does that come from? Most likely small allocators and crypto-native capital, not institutional mainstream that needs diversification from stocks and bonds. Basis+ which gave 2.36 percent in a bear market is interesting for some, but it does not solve a European pension fund's strategic needs. You can get this yield in other safer placements. Furthermore, Hilbert doesn't just sell strategy. They sell the integration of five acquired companies. Enigma is still burning money. Nordark is waiting for MiCA approval which is not certain. Syntetika received USD 10 million post-period — that is not scaling. Since H1 2026, they have increased by 19 percent dilution. The next emission comes Q4 2026, probably at a lower price. The pattern is clear: each emission is less attractive than the previous one. For me, this is not about Hilbert being a stupid investment. It's about it being a venture-scale growth story, not an operational business. If you believe crypto-institutional adoption explodes and MiCA opens the doors massively, the shares might be reasonable. But if you believe AUM growth is crypto-native and venture-driven, and that revenue will not scale with costs for several years, then the share has asymmetric downside risk. Wait until Q4 2026. If they haven't received MiCA approval, Enigma to breakeven or clear institutional AUM-allocations of 50 MSEK from named sources, then the cash position is critical and the next raise will be bad.
There are many errors here and this post of yours has not been fact-checked. You show that you don't understand the case here! Hilbert has an SWF that has allocated multiple times, so there's your proof. Due diligence takes time and large tranches can come when it does, so that 150m USD is unrealistic shows that you don't know what clients they have. Basis pluss is on top of bitcoin and has nothing to do with a risk-free rate. You don't understand this case, so take your math elsewhere and see if you can factor in the future in other stocks. Discussion is fine, but spreading misinformation as if it were facts is truly too stupid!
·11 t sittenFor the first time today at 4 PM, I have received a good email from Hilbert's "Investor relations". Perhaps the need is gradually becoming clear to them.
- ·13 t sittenFrom today's PM: "Hilbert believes that current cash and planning assumptions provide sufficient financial endurance to implement the current plan, even in a scenario where assets under management (AUM) do not grow from current levels, the company writes" Isn't the plan based on increasing AUM and thereby achieving profitability? Can someone explain?
I understood it very well, at 10. Others didn't even understand it at 15. The valuation was completely wild, as if everything was on track in a best-case scenario- Now at 1/5 - 1/8 of the 1-year-old price, this is starting to become much much more interesting. Now this actually has potentially great upside potential The stock has come down sharply; everything one needs to know about what will happen here in the next 6 months, no one knows and no answers are given. Sitting and chatting on a forum is a waste of time and hardly makes anyone rich. Buy near ATL, when others have waited 3-4 years without return, dump their shares and take losses. It is now that there is potential here 
·19 t sitten · MuokattuSee today's PR. The company would not have arranged this if they didn't have a clear conviction that they are delivering as they should and that costs are being cut and the cash balance is sufficient until CBE. Want to emphasize: You must join this Q&A. I guarantee that everyone here and on other forums will see the case for what they actually deliver. So share further outside Nordnet. Many relevant questions are being submitted, everything will be answered. Hilbert invites shareholders and investors to an open Q&A next Wednesday, 9 September. The key message: The company is now moving from a heavy investment phase into monetization. After significant investments over the past 12 months, the setup is increasingly geared towards higher revenues and lower costs going forward. Importantly, Hilbert highlights that the recent recovery in Bitcoin prices has meaningful positive implications for both AUM pipeline conversion and realized fee revenue already in the current quarter, with further details to be presented next week. Conclusion: The 45% share price decline over the past month appears increasingly disconnected from the underlying trajectory of the business. The market has been concerned about slower AUM growth, but this largely coincides with the traditionally quiet July/August period when institutional allocators are on holiday. Hilbert is now signaling that AUM conversion is expected to accelerate, while the company is entering the monetization phase with a much more favorable revenue/cost profile. The fund itself is also performing exceptionally well, ranking in the top 1% of its hedge-fund peer group YTD. For context, asset managers/hedge funds can trade at roughly 10–15% of AUM, depending on growth, performance and fee potential. Applying this framework to Hilbert's fund AUM alone, excluding the value of its other businesses, implies a potential equity value of approximately USD 60–90m. In other words, the market is currently pricing Hilbert as if growth is slowing just as the company is telling investors that AUM conversion is about to accelerate and the monetization phase is beginning. Next week's update could therefore be an important catalyst for a significant re-rating.
·1 päivä sittenI believe: - Hilbert has understood the importance of this and will clarify/calm the market - We want Basis to make 25% per year but just breaking even in 2026 is good..now we're ramping up and will increase - Enigma, Hilbert Finance and Syntetika are doing great. Hilbert's management must announce this - A pipeline of 300m will probably materialize soon. June was terrible.."BTC 58k..are we going down to 40k first" and much hesitation and then came summer and vacation..but now BTC has turned up and I think we're soon in a bull run..AUM will flow in These days have been extremely tough and difficult…but I believe and hope we've bottomed out here! In the long run…I hope this can be a lesson for Hilbert and their TERRIBLE comms..this must be improved! The company is really really doing well! Their IR and PRs are worthless! I would have done the job 100 times better!! Explain ALL figures in detail etc etc
Hopefully this means that someone in management has called Barnali to account to take her responsibility and communicate with us shareholders. Or even better, if she herself has gotten her act together... And what I hope for most is that they have muzzled Russel Thompson! The slightly arrogant and nonchalant British superior tone has evidently not landed well with us Scandinavians. Yes, yes, he was very good with Liberty Road, but now it's a new deal, a new time, and a new company.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten
‧16 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenHilbert Group — Who Should Actually Allocate? I have reviewed the Q2 2026 report from Hilbert Group, and I am left with one overarching question: who should actually allocate to these strategies, and why now? The math starts with Hilbert's annual revenue being around 14 MSEK, while they burn 66 MSEK per year. To close that gap solely with AUM growth and fee scaling, they need either 1.5–2 billion in AUM or a 5–6 percent fee rate. Both are unrealistic. No serious players are willing to pay so much fees on seed classes. Hilbert's argument is that "institutional allocators" are investing. But who are these? They mention Helena Global, which is a venture fund that invests in their shares, not in the strategies. They mention a "crypto-native foundation" that allocated USD 10 million. That's it. I see no tier-1 European pension funds, no American endowments, no sovereign wealth funds. I don't even see established hedge-of-funds that would normally go through three to five years of track record before allocating. AUM growth of 136 percent in Q1 and 8.5 percent in Q2 — where does that come from? Most likely small allocators and crypto-native capital, not institutional mainstream that needs diversification from stocks and bonds. Basis+ which gave 2.36 percent in a bear market is interesting for some, but it does not solve a European pension fund's strategic needs. You can get this yield in other safer placements. Furthermore, Hilbert doesn't just sell strategy. They sell the integration of five acquired companies. Enigma is still burning money. Nordark is waiting for MiCA approval which is not certain. Syntetika received USD 10 million post-period — that is not scaling. Since H1 2026, they have increased by 19 percent dilution. The next emission comes Q4 2026, probably at a lower price. The pattern is clear: each emission is less attractive than the previous one. For me, this is not about Hilbert being a stupid investment. It's about it being a venture-scale growth story, not an operational business. If you believe crypto-institutional adoption explodes and MiCA opens the doors massively, the shares might be reasonable. But if you believe AUM growth is crypto-native and venture-driven, and that revenue will not scale with costs for several years, then the share has asymmetric downside risk. Wait until Q4 2026. If they haven't received MiCA approval, Enigma to breakeven or clear institutional AUM-allocations of 50 MSEK from named sources, then the cash position is critical and the next raise will be bad.There are many errors here and this post of yours has not been fact-checked. You show that you don't understand the case here! Hilbert has an SWF that has allocated multiple times, so there's your proof. Due diligence takes time and large tranches can come when it does, so that 150m USD is unrealistic shows that you don't know what clients they have. Basis pluss is on top of bitcoin and has nothing to do with a risk-free rate. You don't understand this case, so take your math elsewhere and see if you can factor in the future in other stocks. Discussion is fine, but spreading misinformation as if it were facts is truly too stupid!
- ·11 t sittenFor the first time today at 4 PM, I have received a good email from Hilbert's "Investor relations". Perhaps the need is gradually becoming clear to them.
- ·13 t sittenFrom today's PM: "Hilbert believes that current cash and planning assumptions provide sufficient financial endurance to implement the current plan, even in a scenario where assets under management (AUM) do not grow from current levels, the company writes" Isn't the plan based on increasing AUM and thereby achieving profitability? Can someone explain?I understood it very well, at 10. Others didn't even understand it at 15. The valuation was completely wild, as if everything was on track in a best-case scenario- Now at 1/5 - 1/8 of the 1-year-old price, this is starting to become much much more interesting. Now this actually has potentially great upside potential The stock has come down sharply; everything one needs to know about what will happen here in the next 6 months, no one knows and no answers are given. Sitting and chatting on a forum is a waste of time and hardly makes anyone rich. Buy near ATL, when others have waited 3-4 years without return, dump their shares and take losses. It is now that there is potential here
- ·19 t sitten · MuokattuSee today's PR. The company would not have arranged this if they didn't have a clear conviction that they are delivering as they should and that costs are being cut and the cash balance is sufficient until CBE. Want to emphasize: You must join this Q&A. I guarantee that everyone here and on other forums will see the case for what they actually deliver. So share further outside Nordnet. Many relevant questions are being submitted, everything will be answered. Hilbert invites shareholders and investors to an open Q&A next Wednesday, 9 September. The key message: The company is now moving from a heavy investment phase into monetization. After significant investments over the past 12 months, the setup is increasingly geared towards higher revenues and lower costs going forward. Importantly, Hilbert highlights that the recent recovery in Bitcoin prices has meaningful positive implications for both AUM pipeline conversion and realized fee revenue already in the current quarter, with further details to be presented next week. Conclusion: The 45% share price decline over the past month appears increasingly disconnected from the underlying trajectory of the business. The market has been concerned about slower AUM growth, but this largely coincides with the traditionally quiet July/August period when institutional allocators are on holiday. Hilbert is now signaling that AUM conversion is expected to accelerate, while the company is entering the monetization phase with a much more favorable revenue/cost profile. The fund itself is also performing exceptionally well, ranking in the top 1% of its hedge-fund peer group YTD. For context, asset managers/hedge funds can trade at roughly 10–15% of AUM, depending on growth, performance and fee potential. Applying this framework to Hilbert's fund AUM alone, excluding the value of its other businesses, implies a potential equity value of approximately USD 60–90m. In other words, the market is currently pricing Hilbert as if growth is slowing just as the company is telling investors that AUM conversion is about to accelerate and the monetization phase is beginning. Next week's update could therefore be an important catalyst for a significant re-rating.
- ·1 päivä sittenI believe: - Hilbert has understood the importance of this and will clarify/calm the market - We want Basis to make 25% per year but just breaking even in 2026 is good..now we're ramping up and will increase - Enigma, Hilbert Finance and Syntetika are doing great. Hilbert's management must announce this - A pipeline of 300m will probably materialize soon. June was terrible.."BTC 58k..are we going down to 40k first" and much hesitation and then came summer and vacation..but now BTC has turned up and I think we're soon in a bull run..AUM will flow in These days have been extremely tough and difficult…but I believe and hope we've bottomed out here! In the long run…I hope this can be a lesson for Hilbert and their TERRIBLE comms..this must be improved! The company is really really doing well! Their IR and PRs are worthless! I would have done the job 100 times better!! Explain ALL figures in detail etc etcHopefully this means that someone in management has called Barnali to account to take her responsibility and communicate with us shareholders. Or even better, if she herself has gotten her act together... And what I hope for most is that they have muzzled Russel Thompson! The slightly arrogant and nonchalant British superior tone has evidently not landed well with us Scandinavians. Yes, yes, he was very good with Liberty Road, but now it's a new deal, a new time, and a new company.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | - | - | ||
| 6 702 | - | - | ||
| 427 | - | - | ||
| 339 | - | - | ||
| 79 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 30.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 31.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 29.8.2025 |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten
‧16 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 30.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 31.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 29.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·6 t sittenHilbert Group — Who Should Actually Allocate? I have reviewed the Q2 2026 report from Hilbert Group, and I am left with one overarching question: who should actually allocate to these strategies, and why now? The math starts with Hilbert's annual revenue being around 14 MSEK, while they burn 66 MSEK per year. To close that gap solely with AUM growth and fee scaling, they need either 1.5–2 billion in AUM or a 5–6 percent fee rate. Both are unrealistic. No serious players are willing to pay so much fees on seed classes. Hilbert's argument is that "institutional allocators" are investing. But who are these? They mention Helena Global, which is a venture fund that invests in their shares, not in the strategies. They mention a "crypto-native foundation" that allocated USD 10 million. That's it. I see no tier-1 European pension funds, no American endowments, no sovereign wealth funds. I don't even see established hedge-of-funds that would normally go through three to five years of track record before allocating. AUM growth of 136 percent in Q1 and 8.5 percent in Q2 — where does that come from? Most likely small allocators and crypto-native capital, not institutional mainstream that needs diversification from stocks and bonds. Basis+ which gave 2.36 percent in a bear market is interesting for some, but it does not solve a European pension fund's strategic needs. You can get this yield in other safer placements. Furthermore, Hilbert doesn't just sell strategy. They sell the integration of five acquired companies. Enigma is still burning money. Nordark is waiting for MiCA approval which is not certain. Syntetika received USD 10 million post-period — that is not scaling. Since H1 2026, they have increased by 19 percent dilution. The next emission comes Q4 2026, probably at a lower price. The pattern is clear: each emission is less attractive than the previous one. For me, this is not about Hilbert being a stupid investment. It's about it being a venture-scale growth story, not an operational business. If you believe crypto-institutional adoption explodes and MiCA opens the doors massively, the shares might be reasonable. But if you believe AUM growth is crypto-native and venture-driven, and that revenue will not scale with costs for several years, then the share has asymmetric downside risk. Wait until Q4 2026. If they haven't received MiCA approval, Enigma to breakeven or clear institutional AUM-allocations of 50 MSEK from named sources, then the cash position is critical and the next raise will be bad.There are many errors here and this post of yours has not been fact-checked. You show that you don't understand the case here! Hilbert has an SWF that has allocated multiple times, so there's your proof. Due diligence takes time and large tranches can come when it does, so that 150m USD is unrealistic shows that you don't know what clients they have. Basis pluss is on top of bitcoin and has nothing to do with a risk-free rate. You don't understand this case, so take your math elsewhere and see if you can factor in the future in other stocks. Discussion is fine, but spreading misinformation as if it were facts is truly too stupid!
- ·11 t sittenFor the first time today at 4 PM, I have received a good email from Hilbert's "Investor relations". Perhaps the need is gradually becoming clear to them.
- ·13 t sittenFrom today's PM: "Hilbert believes that current cash and planning assumptions provide sufficient financial endurance to implement the current plan, even in a scenario where assets under management (AUM) do not grow from current levels, the company writes" Isn't the plan based on increasing AUM and thereby achieving profitability? Can someone explain?I understood it very well, at 10. Others didn't even understand it at 15. The valuation was completely wild, as if everything was on track in a best-case scenario- Now at 1/5 - 1/8 of the 1-year-old price, this is starting to become much much more interesting. Now this actually has potentially great upside potential The stock has come down sharply; everything one needs to know about what will happen here in the next 6 months, no one knows and no answers are given. Sitting and chatting on a forum is a waste of time and hardly makes anyone rich. Buy near ATL, when others have waited 3-4 years without return, dump their shares and take losses. It is now that there is potential here
- ·19 t sitten · MuokattuSee today's PR. The company would not have arranged this if they didn't have a clear conviction that they are delivering as they should and that costs are being cut and the cash balance is sufficient until CBE. Want to emphasize: You must join this Q&A. I guarantee that everyone here and on other forums will see the case for what they actually deliver. So share further outside Nordnet. Many relevant questions are being submitted, everything will be answered. Hilbert invites shareholders and investors to an open Q&A next Wednesday, 9 September. The key message: The company is now moving from a heavy investment phase into monetization. After significant investments over the past 12 months, the setup is increasingly geared towards higher revenues and lower costs going forward. Importantly, Hilbert highlights that the recent recovery in Bitcoin prices has meaningful positive implications for both AUM pipeline conversion and realized fee revenue already in the current quarter, with further details to be presented next week. Conclusion: The 45% share price decline over the past month appears increasingly disconnected from the underlying trajectory of the business. The market has been concerned about slower AUM growth, but this largely coincides with the traditionally quiet July/August period when institutional allocators are on holiday. Hilbert is now signaling that AUM conversion is expected to accelerate, while the company is entering the monetization phase with a much more favorable revenue/cost profile. The fund itself is also performing exceptionally well, ranking in the top 1% of its hedge-fund peer group YTD. For context, asset managers/hedge funds can trade at roughly 10–15% of AUM, depending on growth, performance and fee potential. Applying this framework to Hilbert's fund AUM alone, excluding the value of its other businesses, implies a potential equity value of approximately USD 60–90m. In other words, the market is currently pricing Hilbert as if growth is slowing just as the company is telling investors that AUM conversion is about to accelerate and the monetization phase is beginning. Next week's update could therefore be an important catalyst for a significant re-rating.
- ·1 päivä sittenI believe: - Hilbert has understood the importance of this and will clarify/calm the market - We want Basis to make 25% per year but just breaking even in 2026 is good..now we're ramping up and will increase - Enigma, Hilbert Finance and Syntetika are doing great. Hilbert's management must announce this - A pipeline of 300m will probably materialize soon. June was terrible.."BTC 58k..are we going down to 40k first" and much hesitation and then came summer and vacation..but now BTC has turned up and I think we're soon in a bull run..AUM will flow in These days have been extremely tough and difficult…but I believe and hope we've bottomed out here! In the long run…I hope this can be a lesson for Hilbert and their TERRIBLE comms..this must be improved! The company is really really doing well! Their IR and PRs are worthless! I would have done the job 100 times better!! Explain ALL figures in detail etc etcHopefully this means that someone in management has called Barnali to account to take her responsibility and communicate with us shareholders. Or even better, if she herself has gotten her act together... And what I hope for most is that they have muzzled Russel Thompson! The slightly arrogant and nonchalant British superior tone has evidently not landed well with us Scandinavians. Yes, yes, he was very good with Liberty Road, but now it's a new deal, a new time, and a new company.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | - | - | ||
| 6 702 | - | - | ||
| 427 | - | - | ||
| 339 | - | - | ||
| 79 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt