Q3-osavuosiraportti
Vain PDF
25 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
First North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
100 000
Myynti
Määrä
123 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 30 000 | - | - | ||
| 68 000 | - | - | ||
| 12 263 | - | - | ||
| 12 737 | - | - |
Ylin
0,085VWAP
Alin
0,077VaihtoMäärä
0,4 4 798 817
VWAP
Ylin
0,085Alin
0,077VaihtoMäärä
0,4 4 798 817
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 6.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| Merkintäoikeusanti | 11.11. | |
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 24.10. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.8. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 23.5. | |
| 2024 Ylimääräinen yhtiökokous | 23.5. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·3 päivää sittenI have 25,000 of this small stock, so full participation costs me approx 300 kr. That's money I can do without, so because of FOMO I participate fully if they were to succeed. If they do, it could certainly take off properly. Otherwise, I'll just have to pause my Netflix subscription for 2 months
·13.11.1. Burn-rate – how long will the money last? We base this on the company's latest quarterly report (Q3 2025), which shows: Operating profit per quarter: approx. –9.5 MSEK Cash flow/liquidity consumption (burn rate): approx. –7 to –10 MSEK per quarter We calculate with –9 MSEK/Q as an average. After the issue, Terranet receives: 18.5 MSEK (rights issue) ≈ 26.75 MSEK (directed issue, previously announced) Total: ≈ 45 MSEK before costs Net after costs: approx. 41 MSEK 👉 41 MSEK / 9 MSEK per quarter = approx. 4.5 quarters of financing. 📌 Translated into calendar This is roughly enough for: ≈ 15–18 months Thus, financing until Q1/Q2 2027, which the company itself also states. This is not long, but not critical either. ⚠️ 2. Scenario analysis – what happens if the issue is not fully subscribed? A. Full subscription (best realistic scenario) Terranet receives 18.5 MSEK Gets peace of mind for 15–18 months Can conduct customer tests and pitch BlincVision Probably requires a new issue in 2027 if no revenues come in The share price is kept down due to dilution, but the company lives on → This scenario is stable, not bullish. B. Partial subscription (most common in today's market) If, for example, 50 % is subscribed: Terranet only receives 9–10 MSEK Burn-rate lasts for 6–9 months The company needs a new issue already by the end of 2026 Risk that the share price continues to be low due to recurring issues → This is the most likely scenario unless larger investors step in. C. Failed issue (worst case) If the issue is very weakly subscribed: Terranet receives <30 % of the capital The money lasts for 3–5 months The company is forced to: reduce staff negotiate bridge loans do another issue quickly (at an even lower price) Increased risk of customers hesitating → In this scenario, the share price drops further and the company struggles. 🚗 3. Decisive factor: Will OEM agreements come? This is what the strategic reality looks like: Terranet does not need: ❌ self-driving systems ❌ large-scale series production immediately ❌ a massive factory Terranet only needs ONE thing: 👉 An OEM/Tier-1 agreement or “proof-of-concept deployment” This can provide: milestone revenues upfront payment financing through partners instead of shareholders This is all that is needed to break the financing dependency. 🧠 4. What does this mean for you as an investor? Here is the honest picture: 🔵 Neutral/Reasonable interpretation Terranet is a typical deeptech-case: the share price is extremely low due to historical issues the technology is promising but untested on a commercial scale the issue gives the company time but doesn't solve everything if OEM agreements come → potential multibagger if no agreement comes → more issues, lower price It is high risk – high reward. 🟢 Bull case (optimistic but realistic) Assume Terranet gets: an evaluation agreement a test in a car model revenues 2026/2027 a new patent approved regulatory requirements that favor hyperspeed detection Then the share price can: 📈 rise 200–500 % in a few weeks This has happened in similar companies with the first OEM news. 🔴 Bear case (negative scenario) issue weakly subscribed no OEM announcements new issue at the end of 2026 price around 0.02–0.05 SEK continued dilution This is the risk picture you must be aware of. 🎯 Conclusion: What does this mean for your decision? This is a speculative tech play – not a stable investment. But: ✔ If the technology works → the company can become much more valuable ✔ The issue buys time ✔ The share price is pressed to extremely low levels ✔ The potential remains ✔ The risks are clear It is a position one takes with a small part of the capital, not large sums, if one wants to participate in a possible tech breakthrough.- ·13.11.Why the stock looks the way it does It is typical for a development company: 7–10 years of development → low or no revenue many share issues the share price is pushed down 90–99 % then when the first order comes everything turns around This is a common pattern in deeptech: Company Before breakthrough After breakthrough Smart Eye –95 % +2000 % after BMW-agreement Fingerprint Cards –90 % +3000 % at mobile breakthrough Veoneer –80 % acquired for billions Autoliv loss-making company for 10 years global safety dominance Terranet is in the same phase: the technology is ready – commercialization remains.
- ·13.11.Is the stock in line with the development? Yes – it is actually ahead of the development. The price reflects high risk, no revenue, share issues It does not reflect the technology that has been completed The market has not priced in the sensor revolution No OEM announcement is in the price No license revenues are in the price This is a “pre-repricing stadium”. So: yes, the stock is in line – but investor-sentiment is lagging. This means: ✔ The price is pressured ✔ Technology ready ✔ Commercialization ahead ✔ Risk–reward high ✔ News can cause an upward overreaction Conclusion The stock has historically collapsed, but is now in the right position for the technology shift. What is now driving value is: customer tests OEM agreements licenses validated demonstrators regulatory requirements for faster sensors If Terranet achieves a breakthrough, the price can move very quickly. If a breakthrough fails to materialize → the company can remain at a low level for a long time.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q3-osavuosiraportti
Vain PDF
25 päivää sitten
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenI have 25,000 of this small stock, so full participation costs me approx 300 kr. That's money I can do without, so because of FOMO I participate fully if they were to succeed. If they do, it could certainly take off properly. Otherwise, I'll just have to pause my Netflix subscription for 2 months
- ·13.11.1. Burn-rate – how long will the money last? We base this on the company's latest quarterly report (Q3 2025), which shows: Operating profit per quarter: approx. –9.5 MSEK Cash flow/liquidity consumption (burn rate): approx. –7 to –10 MSEK per quarter We calculate with –9 MSEK/Q as an average. After the issue, Terranet receives: 18.5 MSEK (rights issue) ≈ 26.75 MSEK (directed issue, previously announced) Total: ≈ 45 MSEK before costs Net after costs: approx. 41 MSEK 👉 41 MSEK / 9 MSEK per quarter = approx. 4.5 quarters of financing. 📌 Translated into calendar This is roughly enough for: ≈ 15–18 months Thus, financing until Q1/Q2 2027, which the company itself also states. This is not long, but not critical either. ⚠️ 2. Scenario analysis – what happens if the issue is not fully subscribed? A. Full subscription (best realistic scenario) Terranet receives 18.5 MSEK Gets peace of mind for 15–18 months Can conduct customer tests and pitch BlincVision Probably requires a new issue in 2027 if no revenues come in The share price is kept down due to dilution, but the company lives on → This scenario is stable, not bullish. B. Partial subscription (most common in today's market) If, for example, 50 % is subscribed: Terranet only receives 9–10 MSEK Burn-rate lasts for 6–9 months The company needs a new issue already by the end of 2026 Risk that the share price continues to be low due to recurring issues → This is the most likely scenario unless larger investors step in. C. Failed issue (worst case) If the issue is very weakly subscribed: Terranet receives <30 % of the capital The money lasts for 3–5 months The company is forced to: reduce staff negotiate bridge loans do another issue quickly (at an even lower price) Increased risk of customers hesitating → In this scenario, the share price drops further and the company struggles. 🚗 3. Decisive factor: Will OEM agreements come? This is what the strategic reality looks like: Terranet does not need: ❌ self-driving systems ❌ large-scale series production immediately ❌ a massive factory Terranet only needs ONE thing: 👉 An OEM/Tier-1 agreement or “proof-of-concept deployment” This can provide: milestone revenues upfront payment financing through partners instead of shareholders This is all that is needed to break the financing dependency. 🧠 4. What does this mean for you as an investor? Here is the honest picture: 🔵 Neutral/Reasonable interpretation Terranet is a typical deeptech-case: the share price is extremely low due to historical issues the technology is promising but untested on a commercial scale the issue gives the company time but doesn't solve everything if OEM agreements come → potential multibagger if no agreement comes → more issues, lower price It is high risk – high reward. 🟢 Bull case (optimistic but realistic) Assume Terranet gets: an evaluation agreement a test in a car model revenues 2026/2027 a new patent approved regulatory requirements that favor hyperspeed detection Then the share price can: 📈 rise 200–500 % in a few weeks This has happened in similar companies with the first OEM news. 🔴 Bear case (negative scenario) issue weakly subscribed no OEM announcements new issue at the end of 2026 price around 0.02–0.05 SEK continued dilution This is the risk picture you must be aware of. 🎯 Conclusion: What does this mean for your decision? This is a speculative tech play – not a stable investment. But: ✔ If the technology works → the company can become much more valuable ✔ The issue buys time ✔ The share price is pressed to extremely low levels ✔ The potential remains ✔ The risks are clear It is a position one takes with a small part of the capital, not large sums, if one wants to participate in a possible tech breakthrough.
- ·13.11.Why the stock looks the way it does It is typical for a development company: 7–10 years of development → low or no revenue many share issues the share price is pushed down 90–99 % then when the first order comes everything turns around This is a common pattern in deeptech: Company Before breakthrough After breakthrough Smart Eye –95 % +2000 % after BMW-agreement Fingerprint Cards –90 % +3000 % at mobile breakthrough Veoneer –80 % acquired for billions Autoliv loss-making company for 10 years global safety dominance Terranet is in the same phase: the technology is ready – commercialization remains.
- ·13.11.Is the stock in line with the development? Yes – it is actually ahead of the development. The price reflects high risk, no revenue, share issues It does not reflect the technology that has been completed The market has not priced in the sensor revolution No OEM announcement is in the price No license revenues are in the price This is a “pre-repricing stadium”. So: yes, the stock is in line – but investor-sentiment is lagging. This means: ✔ The price is pressured ✔ Technology ready ✔ Commercialization ahead ✔ Risk–reward high ✔ News can cause an upward overreaction Conclusion The stock has historically collapsed, but is now in the right position for the technology shift. What is now driving value is: customer tests OEM agreements licenses validated demonstrators regulatory requirements for faster sensors If Terranet achieves a breakthrough, the price can move very quickly. If a breakthrough fails to materialize → the company can remain at a low level for a long time.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
100 000
Myynti
Määrä
123 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 30 000 | - | - | ||
| 68 000 | - | - | ||
| 12 263 | - | - | ||
| 12 737 | - | - |
Ylin
0,085VWAP
Alin
0,077VaihtoMäärä
0,4 4 798 817
VWAP
Ylin
0,085Alin
0,077VaihtoMäärä
0,4 4 798 817
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 6.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| Merkintäoikeusanti | 11.11. | |
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 24.10. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.8. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 23.5. | |
| 2024 Ylimääräinen yhtiökokous | 23.5. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Q3-osavuosiraportti
Vain PDF
25 päivää sitten
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 6.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| Merkintäoikeusanti | 11.11. | |
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 24.10. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.8. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 23.5. | |
| 2024 Ylimääräinen yhtiökokous | 23.5. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenI have 25,000 of this small stock, so full participation costs me approx 300 kr. That's money I can do without, so because of FOMO I participate fully if they were to succeed. If they do, it could certainly take off properly. Otherwise, I'll just have to pause my Netflix subscription for 2 months
- ·13.11.1. Burn-rate – how long will the money last? We base this on the company's latest quarterly report (Q3 2025), which shows: Operating profit per quarter: approx. –9.5 MSEK Cash flow/liquidity consumption (burn rate): approx. –7 to –10 MSEK per quarter We calculate with –9 MSEK/Q as an average. After the issue, Terranet receives: 18.5 MSEK (rights issue) ≈ 26.75 MSEK (directed issue, previously announced) Total: ≈ 45 MSEK before costs Net after costs: approx. 41 MSEK 👉 41 MSEK / 9 MSEK per quarter = approx. 4.5 quarters of financing. 📌 Translated into calendar This is roughly enough for: ≈ 15–18 months Thus, financing until Q1/Q2 2027, which the company itself also states. This is not long, but not critical either. ⚠️ 2. Scenario analysis – what happens if the issue is not fully subscribed? A. Full subscription (best realistic scenario) Terranet receives 18.5 MSEK Gets peace of mind for 15–18 months Can conduct customer tests and pitch BlincVision Probably requires a new issue in 2027 if no revenues come in The share price is kept down due to dilution, but the company lives on → This scenario is stable, not bullish. B. Partial subscription (most common in today's market) If, for example, 50 % is subscribed: Terranet only receives 9–10 MSEK Burn-rate lasts for 6–9 months The company needs a new issue already by the end of 2026 Risk that the share price continues to be low due to recurring issues → This is the most likely scenario unless larger investors step in. C. Failed issue (worst case) If the issue is very weakly subscribed: Terranet receives <30 % of the capital The money lasts for 3–5 months The company is forced to: reduce staff negotiate bridge loans do another issue quickly (at an even lower price) Increased risk of customers hesitating → In this scenario, the share price drops further and the company struggles. 🚗 3. Decisive factor: Will OEM agreements come? This is what the strategic reality looks like: Terranet does not need: ❌ self-driving systems ❌ large-scale series production immediately ❌ a massive factory Terranet only needs ONE thing: 👉 An OEM/Tier-1 agreement or “proof-of-concept deployment” This can provide: milestone revenues upfront payment financing through partners instead of shareholders This is all that is needed to break the financing dependency. 🧠 4. What does this mean for you as an investor? Here is the honest picture: 🔵 Neutral/Reasonable interpretation Terranet is a typical deeptech-case: the share price is extremely low due to historical issues the technology is promising but untested on a commercial scale the issue gives the company time but doesn't solve everything if OEM agreements come → potential multibagger if no agreement comes → more issues, lower price It is high risk – high reward. 🟢 Bull case (optimistic but realistic) Assume Terranet gets: an evaluation agreement a test in a car model revenues 2026/2027 a new patent approved regulatory requirements that favor hyperspeed detection Then the share price can: 📈 rise 200–500 % in a few weeks This has happened in similar companies with the first OEM news. 🔴 Bear case (negative scenario) issue weakly subscribed no OEM announcements new issue at the end of 2026 price around 0.02–0.05 SEK continued dilution This is the risk picture you must be aware of. 🎯 Conclusion: What does this mean for your decision? This is a speculative tech play – not a stable investment. But: ✔ If the technology works → the company can become much more valuable ✔ The issue buys time ✔ The share price is pressed to extremely low levels ✔ The potential remains ✔ The risks are clear It is a position one takes with a small part of the capital, not large sums, if one wants to participate in a possible tech breakthrough.
- ·13.11.Why the stock looks the way it does It is typical for a development company: 7–10 years of development → low or no revenue many share issues the share price is pushed down 90–99 % then when the first order comes everything turns around This is a common pattern in deeptech: Company Before breakthrough After breakthrough Smart Eye –95 % +2000 % after BMW-agreement Fingerprint Cards –90 % +3000 % at mobile breakthrough Veoneer –80 % acquired for billions Autoliv loss-making company for 10 years global safety dominance Terranet is in the same phase: the technology is ready – commercialization remains.
- ·13.11.Is the stock in line with the development? Yes – it is actually ahead of the development. The price reflects high risk, no revenue, share issues It does not reflect the technology that has been completed The market has not priced in the sensor revolution No OEM announcement is in the price No license revenues are in the price This is a “pre-repricing stadium”. So: yes, the stock is in line – but investor-sentiment is lagging. This means: ✔ The price is pressured ✔ Technology ready ✔ Commercialization ahead ✔ Risk–reward high ✔ News can cause an upward overreaction Conclusion The stock has historically collapsed, but is now in the right position for the technology shift. What is now driving value is: customer tests OEM agreements licenses validated demonstrators regulatory requirements for faster sensors If Terranet achieves a breakthrough, the price can move very quickly. If a breakthrough fails to materialize → the company can remain at a low level for a long time.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
100 000
Myynti
Määrä
123 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 000 | - | - | ||
| 30 000 | - | - | ||
| 68 000 | - | - | ||
| 12 263 | - | - | ||
| 12 737 | - | - |
Ylin
0,085VWAP
Alin
0,077VaihtoMäärä
0,4 4 798 817
VWAP
Ylin
0,085Alin
0,077VaihtoMäärä
0,4 4 798 817
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt