2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 14.11.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·18.4.Stablecoin transaction volume reached $33 trillion last year — more than both Visa and Mastercard combined. Enormous demand for digital dollars. But a dilemma is emerging: how can holders earn yield? The CLARITY Act is expected to prohibit stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to holders. The result? Users are forced into complex DeFi vaults just to earn yield on their base holdings. Mike Cagney and Figure have a simpler solution: YLDS. YLDS functions like USDT or USDC — pegged 1:1 to the dollar — but with a crucial difference. Figure has worked directly with the SEC for several years to register YLDS as a security. This classification makes it possible to pass on yield directly to holders, paid out in the same asset, without giving up peer-to-peer transfers on-chain. If the CLARITY Act passes as expected, YLDS will be the only regulated stablecoin that can legally pass on yield. A natural default choice for on-chain users. From $0 to ~$600 million in market cap in under a year. More is yet to come.- ·11.2.Technical debt as a prison Banks cannot "add blockchain" – their core systems are designed for incremental processing, isolated databases, and manual reconciliations. Building programmable assets and real-time settlement requires tearing up the foundation. Figure started with a blank slate. Concrete efficiency gains 100+ basis points in cost reduction by eliminating intermediaries and manual steps 5 minutes → 5 days (compared to 2–6 weeks) for mortgage loans = 10 times faster capital rotation Same-day settlement instead of 2–5 days = frees up capital that would otherwise be locked up Network effects on the horizon Every borrower, service provider, and investor connected to Provenance makes it more expensive for the next player not to join. If Figure reaches critical mass before banks can rebuild, they win the standard. But the moat is attackable The banks' three weapons Capital: Figure's balance sheet is small. Banks can flood the market with capital when interest rates allow Reach: Millions of existing customers compared to Figure's organic growth Regulatory influence: Banks write standards through lobbying and and can get regulations that favor their infrastructure The window of opportunity is closing Fintechs must grow 5–10 times faster than banks' modernization pace If banks succeed in separating customer interfaces from the backend (modern core banking as a service), they can adopt the blockchain rail without tearing everything down When cloud services launch managed blockchain services for finance, the technology becomes a commodity Critical questions for Figure's defense Can they achieve network effects before 2027? If 30 percent or more of US mortgage servicing runs on Provenance, it becomes the de facto standard. Below that, they are vulnerable. Are they building lock-in or an open standard? The paradox: closed systems provide a shorter moat, but open standards risk banks copying and running them themselves. What is the exit strategy? Likely: become infrastructure that banks must buy or license (like SWIFT), or be sold to a major bank as a modernization shortcut. Conclusion: Figure has 3–5 years to transform its technological lead into a structural monopoly. After that, blockchain rail becomes a commodity, and then the one with the cheapest capital and largest reach wins – which are banks.
·7.2. · MuokattuPrice 55.5 definitely did not hold, but was brutally broken, as part of the general de-leveraging event. Next week will be exciting, as the price is balancing right around a pretty large volume shelf. A close above 42.5 will be good, whereas a close below 40 and then 39 is pretty bad.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·18.4.Stablecoin transaction volume reached $33 trillion last year — more than both Visa and Mastercard combined. Enormous demand for digital dollars. But a dilemma is emerging: how can holders earn yield? The CLARITY Act is expected to prohibit stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to holders. The result? Users are forced into complex DeFi vaults just to earn yield on their base holdings. Mike Cagney and Figure have a simpler solution: YLDS. YLDS functions like USDT or USDC — pegged 1:1 to the dollar — but with a crucial difference. Figure has worked directly with the SEC for several years to register YLDS as a security. This classification makes it possible to pass on yield directly to holders, paid out in the same asset, without giving up peer-to-peer transfers on-chain. If the CLARITY Act passes as expected, YLDS will be the only regulated stablecoin that can legally pass on yield. A natural default choice for on-chain users. From $0 to ~$600 million in market cap in under a year. More is yet to come.
- ·11.2.Technical debt as a prison Banks cannot "add blockchain" – their core systems are designed for incremental processing, isolated databases, and manual reconciliations. Building programmable assets and real-time settlement requires tearing up the foundation. Figure started with a blank slate. Concrete efficiency gains 100+ basis points in cost reduction by eliminating intermediaries and manual steps 5 minutes → 5 days (compared to 2–6 weeks) for mortgage loans = 10 times faster capital rotation Same-day settlement instead of 2–5 days = frees up capital that would otherwise be locked up Network effects on the horizon Every borrower, service provider, and investor connected to Provenance makes it more expensive for the next player not to join. If Figure reaches critical mass before banks can rebuild, they win the standard. But the moat is attackable The banks' three weapons Capital: Figure's balance sheet is small. Banks can flood the market with capital when interest rates allow Reach: Millions of existing customers compared to Figure's organic growth Regulatory influence: Banks write standards through lobbying and and can get regulations that favor their infrastructure The window of opportunity is closing Fintechs must grow 5–10 times faster than banks' modernization pace If banks succeed in separating customer interfaces from the backend (modern core banking as a service), they can adopt the blockchain rail without tearing everything down When cloud services launch managed blockchain services for finance, the technology becomes a commodity Critical questions for Figure's defense Can they achieve network effects before 2027? If 30 percent or more of US mortgage servicing runs on Provenance, it becomes the de facto standard. Below that, they are vulnerable. Are they building lock-in or an open standard? The paradox: closed systems provide a shorter moat, but open standards risk banks copying and running them themselves. What is the exit strategy? Likely: become infrastructure that banks must buy or license (like SWIFT), or be sold to a major bank as a modernization shortcut. Conclusion: Figure has 3–5 years to transform its technological lead into a structural monopoly. After that, blockchain rail becomes a commodity, and then the one with the cheapest capital and largest reach wins – which are banks.
- ·7.2. · MuokattuPrice 55.5 definitely did not hold, but was brutally broken, as part of the general de-leveraging event. Next week will be exciting, as the price is balancing right around a pretty large volume shelf. A close above 42.5 will be good, whereas a close below 40 and then 39 is pretty bad.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 14.11.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Uutiset
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 14.11.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·18.4.Stablecoin transaction volume reached $33 trillion last year — more than both Visa and Mastercard combined. Enormous demand for digital dollars. But a dilemma is emerging: how can holders earn yield? The CLARITY Act is expected to prohibit stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to holders. The result? Users are forced into complex DeFi vaults just to earn yield on their base holdings. Mike Cagney and Figure have a simpler solution: YLDS. YLDS functions like USDT or USDC — pegged 1:1 to the dollar — but with a crucial difference. Figure has worked directly with the SEC for several years to register YLDS as a security. This classification makes it possible to pass on yield directly to holders, paid out in the same asset, without giving up peer-to-peer transfers on-chain. If the CLARITY Act passes as expected, YLDS will be the only regulated stablecoin that can legally pass on yield. A natural default choice for on-chain users. From $0 to ~$600 million in market cap in under a year. More is yet to come.
- ·11.2.Technical debt as a prison Banks cannot "add blockchain" – their core systems are designed for incremental processing, isolated databases, and manual reconciliations. Building programmable assets and real-time settlement requires tearing up the foundation. Figure started with a blank slate. Concrete efficiency gains 100+ basis points in cost reduction by eliminating intermediaries and manual steps 5 minutes → 5 days (compared to 2–6 weeks) for mortgage loans = 10 times faster capital rotation Same-day settlement instead of 2–5 days = frees up capital that would otherwise be locked up Network effects on the horizon Every borrower, service provider, and investor connected to Provenance makes it more expensive for the next player not to join. If Figure reaches critical mass before banks can rebuild, they win the standard. But the moat is attackable The banks' three weapons Capital: Figure's balance sheet is small. Banks can flood the market with capital when interest rates allow Reach: Millions of existing customers compared to Figure's organic growth Regulatory influence: Banks write standards through lobbying and and can get regulations that favor their infrastructure The window of opportunity is closing Fintechs must grow 5–10 times faster than banks' modernization pace If banks succeed in separating customer interfaces from the backend (modern core banking as a service), they can adopt the blockchain rail without tearing everything down When cloud services launch managed blockchain services for finance, the technology becomes a commodity Critical questions for Figure's defense Can they achieve network effects before 2027? If 30 percent or more of US mortgage servicing runs on Provenance, it becomes the de facto standard. Below that, they are vulnerable. Are they building lock-in or an open standard? The paradox: closed systems provide a shorter moat, but open standards risk banks copying and running them themselves. What is the exit strategy? Likely: become infrastructure that banks must buy or license (like SWIFT), or be sold to a major bank as a modernization shortcut. Conclusion: Figure has 3–5 years to transform its technological lead into a structural monopoly. After that, blockchain rail becomes a commodity, and then the one with the cheapest capital and largest reach wins – which are banks.
- ·7.2. · MuokattuPrice 55.5 definitely did not hold, but was brutally broken, as part of the general de-leveraging event. Next week will be exciting, as the price is balancing right around a pretty large volume shelf. A close above 42.5 will be good, whereas a close below 40 and then 39 is pretty bad.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt