2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
86 päivää sitten
‧1 t 1 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
17.7. · MuokattuReading the Avanza post on a "wishlist" for communication from the company. I can't post there, so will post here in hopes someone can relay it. I have three requests: 1. They said they would open up some of their internal KPI's, since they were seeing an increase in activity that had not translated into income yet. Capacity utilization, traffic on the platform, number of projects created etc. They did, briefly, share "beneficial" snapshots of some KPI's, but did it- it seems- to obscure transparency (making look good), instead of actually being transparent. I want frequent updates on relevant KPI's, at regular (once a month) intervals, at least until they have delivered what they said they would 1.5 years ago. 2. I want to hear from their technical staff (CTO, Lucy Linder, or someone else in Switzerland, who is directly/closely involved in the platform and day-to-day operations) what they are doing in terms of adapting the platform for the agency strategy. What are the new functions or the new design choices, and why/what about it will be appealing (irresistible) to agencies? 3. I want to hear if they are exploring additional opportunities stemming from the fact that they now have a network of 50+ agencies attached. Surely, there must be ideas about other benefits they could offer to- or garner from this network. The network is a growing number of agencies with Divio at the centre. That is clearly a resource. For example: A "specialist surplus capacity hub" is one idea. Divio could probably quite easily facilitate a marketplace- formal or informal- that could beneift all members/users of the platform. Smaller agencies- who might often find themselves "out of work", between projects, and have spare DEV-capacity- could post their availability, CV's and rates, and/or larger agencies could outsource non-sensitive tasks/assignments, at fixed prices, to relieve periodic overburden, and increase capacity/efficiency in their busiest periods. Idea is a "matchmaker" between agencies that in a given period have too much to do, with agencies that in the same period have too little to do. "Worksharing" like this could probably work for some projects/functions, and especially when most users of the Divio platform are Django specialists, right? Not saying that this particular idea is a good one, because I really don't know if it's practically viable, or something the partners would actually want/use. I'm merely pointing out what should be obvious- that there is sure to be plenty of ways to add value to a network like the one that is forming, and that they should look into unlocking more of it. Technical staff with backgrounds working in/for agencies could probably drum up plenty of good ideas! Some such initiative could be a win/win for all parties involved, offer extra incentive to signing up with Divio and cement the active usage of the platform, while also bolstering and increasing the relevance of the whole little "ecosystem" that might form (and is more and more likely to form) through any additional added benefit. Again, from the template I hope that Divio will adapt: The more success Divio can unlock for their clients/partners, the more success that unlocks for Divio. The network is already forming, and that network is/can be/should be a resource! Offer something more to pick up pace and to make sure it grows! Thanks in advance for relaying my ramblings under the Avanza post, if you will bother.20.7.Thanks, Vinfredag, for realying to avanza forum, and thanks to Bastionen for initiating communication on the topic!- 26.6. · Muokattu"They do the work, and we do the complaining".. Regarding the incentives-program for management: The pie is still shrinking(!) and they are setting up to award themselves a bigger piece of that shrinking pie(!) How about the inverse- an incentives-program for investors, i.e. a dividend? Off course that is untinkable and undoable while the company is still unprofitable. Underperforming, repeatedly missing the targets they outline (and damned near promise/guarantee) in their communication to investors should not award anything, IMO. So I think that both the optics, and the practical outcomes of this decision are quite bad, whilst the company is still burning cash, and whilst the stock is still in severe depression. For me it's also another sign that there's a lack of accountability here. Mgmt., board and the Levin family (largest shareholders) decoupled from- and out of sync with the rest of the shareholder base. Grumpy, sulky grievance posted on here is about all I can do about it.2.7.Come to think of it, JL joining the board, and this incentives initiative might be clues that they are looking for a new CEO, with him taking on more of an administrative/advisory role. If that is the case, these developments make much more sense. We'll see.
- 18.5.Did some follow-up reading on the state of the Heroku PAAS. Seems Salesforce did quite a poor job at maintaining it's appeal post acquisition. An interesting read detailing some pretty clear pitfalls that Divio should seek to learn from in the linked article. Hoping Divio stay true to their slogan "by developers for developers" and prioritize a "no nonsense, pure function"-strategy for developing and marketing the platform. There will definitely be a lot of companies looking for a new PAAS-home. https://medium.com/tech-stackups/heroku-was-already-dead-a-study-in-bad-ux-51180bc698e2
Upsun (platform.sh) seems to have been heavily inspired by Divio (?) 🤔 when they carried out their rebranding last year; the same/similar strong lime/neon color and website appearance. https://upsun.com/ There are a lot of competitors with financial muscle out there, so it's good and important that Divio has a focused and niche strategy now. - 15.5.Good interview, IMO. A decent first step to regaining credibility. https://open.spotify.com/episode/31jQFyEXoHeGFRKNk9QyCb?si=b4e96e8e3a7b47cf&nd=1&dlsi=d8630e2096e244ec
- 14.5.Just a reflection on the price-games being played: If someone could disincentivize competition for subscription of the MANY MILLION shares issued at 0.62 by selling a FEW MILLION shares at 0.58, that would likely be quite a profitable idea. I.e. sell a few million shares at 0.58 to keep others off the subscription, then subscribe for the many million shares yourself. Likely some big long term investor who wants to average down bigly doing this. What's clear is that a company with an anual revenue of 34m SEK and an EPS of -0.01 SEK can not stay valued at a mcap of 36m SEK after this dilution is done, when they will also have 15-20m SEK cash on hand. This large price dip and the dilution (share capital bloat) was in no way what I wanted. J.L. has been telling straightfaced lies about outlook to profitability for the better part of 2 years, and we're quite right to begrudge it. But none of that changes the fact that the stock- through that same period- has (rightly) been severely discounted due to dilution risk. That risk is now gone, and so- we should assume- will be the discount... Assuming J.L. was telling the truth with regards to a Fidelity contract renewal, price appreciation should be sure to follow when this subscription period ends. That in mind, I'm buying what I can of these "price games" and telling friends to either do the same, or to seek subscription for as many shares as possible. You do you.15.5.More cheap shares available through the emission than from sale in the open market. But buying wherever one can get one's fill for cheapest.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
86 päivää sitten
‧1 t 1 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 17.7. · MuokattuReading the Avanza post on a "wishlist" for communication from the company. I can't post there, so will post here in hopes someone can relay it. I have three requests: 1. They said they would open up some of their internal KPI's, since they were seeing an increase in activity that had not translated into income yet. Capacity utilization, traffic on the platform, number of projects created etc. They did, briefly, share "beneficial" snapshots of some KPI's, but did it- it seems- to obscure transparency (making look good), instead of actually being transparent. I want frequent updates on relevant KPI's, at regular (once a month) intervals, at least until they have delivered what they said they would 1.5 years ago. 2. I want to hear from their technical staff (CTO, Lucy Linder, or someone else in Switzerland, who is directly/closely involved in the platform and day-to-day operations) what they are doing in terms of adapting the platform for the agency strategy. What are the new functions or the new design choices, and why/what about it will be appealing (irresistible) to agencies? 3. I want to hear if they are exploring additional opportunities stemming from the fact that they now have a network of 50+ agencies attached. Surely, there must be ideas about other benefits they could offer to- or garner from this network. The network is a growing number of agencies with Divio at the centre. That is clearly a resource. For example: A "specialist surplus capacity hub" is one idea. Divio could probably quite easily facilitate a marketplace- formal or informal- that could beneift all members/users of the platform. Smaller agencies- who might often find themselves "out of work", between projects, and have spare DEV-capacity- could post their availability, CV's and rates, and/or larger agencies could outsource non-sensitive tasks/assignments, at fixed prices, to relieve periodic overburden, and increase capacity/efficiency in their busiest periods. Idea is a "matchmaker" between agencies that in a given period have too much to do, with agencies that in the same period have too little to do. "Worksharing" like this could probably work for some projects/functions, and especially when most users of the Divio platform are Django specialists, right? Not saying that this particular idea is a good one, because I really don't know if it's practically viable, or something the partners would actually want/use. I'm merely pointing out what should be obvious- that there is sure to be plenty of ways to add value to a network like the one that is forming, and that they should look into unlocking more of it. Technical staff with backgrounds working in/for agencies could probably drum up plenty of good ideas! Some such initiative could be a win/win for all parties involved, offer extra incentive to signing up with Divio and cement the active usage of the platform, while also bolstering and increasing the relevance of the whole little "ecosystem" that might form (and is more and more likely to form) through any additional added benefit. Again, from the template I hope that Divio will adapt: The more success Divio can unlock for their clients/partners, the more success that unlocks for Divio. The network is already forming, and that network is/can be/should be a resource! Offer something more to pick up pace and to make sure it grows! Thanks in advance for relaying my ramblings under the Avanza post, if you will bother.20.7.Thanks, Vinfredag, for realying to avanza forum, and thanks to Bastionen for initiating communication on the topic!
- 26.6. · Muokattu"They do the work, and we do the complaining".. Regarding the incentives-program for management: The pie is still shrinking(!) and they are setting up to award themselves a bigger piece of that shrinking pie(!) How about the inverse- an incentives-program for investors, i.e. a dividend? Off course that is untinkable and undoable while the company is still unprofitable. Underperforming, repeatedly missing the targets they outline (and damned near promise/guarantee) in their communication to investors should not award anything, IMO. So I think that both the optics, and the practical outcomes of this decision are quite bad, whilst the company is still burning cash, and whilst the stock is still in severe depression. For me it's also another sign that there's a lack of accountability here. Mgmt., board and the Levin family (largest shareholders) decoupled from- and out of sync with the rest of the shareholder base. Grumpy, sulky grievance posted on here is about all I can do about it.2.7.Come to think of it, JL joining the board, and this incentives initiative might be clues that they are looking for a new CEO, with him taking on more of an administrative/advisory role. If that is the case, these developments make much more sense. We'll see.
- 18.5.Did some follow-up reading on the state of the Heroku PAAS. Seems Salesforce did quite a poor job at maintaining it's appeal post acquisition. An interesting read detailing some pretty clear pitfalls that Divio should seek to learn from in the linked article. Hoping Divio stay true to their slogan "by developers for developers" and prioritize a "no nonsense, pure function"-strategy for developing and marketing the platform. There will definitely be a lot of companies looking for a new PAAS-home. https://medium.com/tech-stackups/heroku-was-already-dead-a-study-in-bad-ux-51180bc698e2Upsun (platform.sh) seems to have been heavily inspired by Divio (?) 🤔 when they carried out their rebranding last year; the same/similar strong lime/neon color and website appearance. https://upsun.com/ There are a lot of competitors with financial muscle out there, so it's good and important that Divio has a focused and niche strategy now.
- 15.5.Good interview, IMO. A decent first step to regaining credibility. https://open.spotify.com/episode/31jQFyEXoHeGFRKNk9QyCb?si=b4e96e8e3a7b47cf&nd=1&dlsi=d8630e2096e244ec
- 14.5.Just a reflection on the price-games being played: If someone could disincentivize competition for subscription of the MANY MILLION shares issued at 0.62 by selling a FEW MILLION shares at 0.58, that would likely be quite a profitable idea. I.e. sell a few million shares at 0.58 to keep others off the subscription, then subscribe for the many million shares yourself. Likely some big long term investor who wants to average down bigly doing this. What's clear is that a company with an anual revenue of 34m SEK and an EPS of -0.01 SEK can not stay valued at a mcap of 36m SEK after this dilution is done, when they will also have 15-20m SEK cash on hand. This large price dip and the dilution (share capital bloat) was in no way what I wanted. J.L. has been telling straightfaced lies about outlook to profitability for the better part of 2 years, and we're quite right to begrudge it. But none of that changes the fact that the stock- through that same period- has (rightly) been severely discounted due to dilution risk. That risk is now gone, and so- we should assume- will be the discount... Assuming J.L. was telling the truth with regards to a Fidelity contract renewal, price appreciation should be sure to follow when this subscription period ends. That in mind, I'm buying what I can of these "price games" and telling friends to either do the same, or to seek subscription for as many shares as possible. You do you.15.5.More cheap shares available through the emission than from sale in the open market. But buying wherever one can get one's fill for cheapest.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
86 päivää sitten
‧1 t 1 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 17.7. · MuokattuReading the Avanza post on a "wishlist" for communication from the company. I can't post there, so will post here in hopes someone can relay it. I have three requests: 1. They said they would open up some of their internal KPI's, since they were seeing an increase in activity that had not translated into income yet. Capacity utilization, traffic on the platform, number of projects created etc. They did, briefly, share "beneficial" snapshots of some KPI's, but did it- it seems- to obscure transparency (making look good), instead of actually being transparent. I want frequent updates on relevant KPI's, at regular (once a month) intervals, at least until they have delivered what they said they would 1.5 years ago. 2. I want to hear from their technical staff (CTO, Lucy Linder, or someone else in Switzerland, who is directly/closely involved in the platform and day-to-day operations) what they are doing in terms of adapting the platform for the agency strategy. What are the new functions or the new design choices, and why/what about it will be appealing (irresistible) to agencies? 3. I want to hear if they are exploring additional opportunities stemming from the fact that they now have a network of 50+ agencies attached. Surely, there must be ideas about other benefits they could offer to- or garner from this network. The network is a growing number of agencies with Divio at the centre. That is clearly a resource. For example: A "specialist surplus capacity hub" is one idea. Divio could probably quite easily facilitate a marketplace- formal or informal- that could beneift all members/users of the platform. Smaller agencies- who might often find themselves "out of work", between projects, and have spare DEV-capacity- could post their availability, CV's and rates, and/or larger agencies could outsource non-sensitive tasks/assignments, at fixed prices, to relieve periodic overburden, and increase capacity/efficiency in their busiest periods. Idea is a "matchmaker" between agencies that in a given period have too much to do, with agencies that in the same period have too little to do. "Worksharing" like this could probably work for some projects/functions, and especially when most users of the Divio platform are Django specialists, right? Not saying that this particular idea is a good one, because I really don't know if it's practically viable, or something the partners would actually want/use. I'm merely pointing out what should be obvious- that there is sure to be plenty of ways to add value to a network like the one that is forming, and that they should look into unlocking more of it. Technical staff with backgrounds working in/for agencies could probably drum up plenty of good ideas! Some such initiative could be a win/win for all parties involved, offer extra incentive to signing up with Divio and cement the active usage of the platform, while also bolstering and increasing the relevance of the whole little "ecosystem" that might form (and is more and more likely to form) through any additional added benefit. Again, from the template I hope that Divio will adapt: The more success Divio can unlock for their clients/partners, the more success that unlocks for Divio. The network is already forming, and that network is/can be/should be a resource! Offer something more to pick up pace and to make sure it grows! Thanks in advance for relaying my ramblings under the Avanza post, if you will bother.20.7.Thanks, Vinfredag, for realying to avanza forum, and thanks to Bastionen for initiating communication on the topic!
- 26.6. · Muokattu"They do the work, and we do the complaining".. Regarding the incentives-program for management: The pie is still shrinking(!) and they are setting up to award themselves a bigger piece of that shrinking pie(!) How about the inverse- an incentives-program for investors, i.e. a dividend? Off course that is untinkable and undoable while the company is still unprofitable. Underperforming, repeatedly missing the targets they outline (and damned near promise/guarantee) in their communication to investors should not award anything, IMO. So I think that both the optics, and the practical outcomes of this decision are quite bad, whilst the company is still burning cash, and whilst the stock is still in severe depression. For me it's also another sign that there's a lack of accountability here. Mgmt., board and the Levin family (largest shareholders) decoupled from- and out of sync with the rest of the shareholder base. Grumpy, sulky grievance posted on here is about all I can do about it.2.7.Come to think of it, JL joining the board, and this incentives initiative might be clues that they are looking for a new CEO, with him taking on more of an administrative/advisory role. If that is the case, these developments make much more sense. We'll see.
- 18.5.Did some follow-up reading on the state of the Heroku PAAS. Seems Salesforce did quite a poor job at maintaining it's appeal post acquisition. An interesting read detailing some pretty clear pitfalls that Divio should seek to learn from in the linked article. Hoping Divio stay true to their slogan "by developers for developers" and prioritize a "no nonsense, pure function"-strategy for developing and marketing the platform. There will definitely be a lot of companies looking for a new PAAS-home. https://medium.com/tech-stackups/heroku-was-already-dead-a-study-in-bad-ux-51180bc698e2Upsun (platform.sh) seems to have been heavily inspired by Divio (?) 🤔 when they carried out their rebranding last year; the same/similar strong lime/neon color and website appearance. https://upsun.com/ There are a lot of competitors with financial muscle out there, so it's good and important that Divio has a focused and niche strategy now.
- 15.5.Good interview, IMO. A decent first step to regaining credibility. https://open.spotify.com/episode/31jQFyEXoHeGFRKNk9QyCb?si=b4e96e8e3a7b47cf&nd=1&dlsi=d8630e2096e244ec
- 14.5.Just a reflection on the price-games being played: If someone could disincentivize competition for subscription of the MANY MILLION shares issued at 0.62 by selling a FEW MILLION shares at 0.58, that would likely be quite a profitable idea. I.e. sell a few million shares at 0.58 to keep others off the subscription, then subscribe for the many million shares yourself. Likely some big long term investor who wants to average down bigly doing this. What's clear is that a company with an anual revenue of 34m SEK and an EPS of -0.01 SEK can not stay valued at a mcap of 36m SEK after this dilution is done, when they will also have 15-20m SEK cash on hand. This large price dip and the dilution (share capital bloat) was in no way what I wanted. J.L. has been telling straightfaced lies about outlook to profitability for the better part of 2 years, and we're quite right to begrudge it. But none of that changes the fact that the stock- through that same period- has (rightly) been severely discounted due to dilution risk. That risk is now gone, and so- we should assume- will be the discount... Assuming J.L. was telling the truth with regards to a Fidelity contract renewal, price appreciation should be sure to follow when this subscription period ends. That in mind, I'm buying what I can of these "price games" and telling friends to either do the same, or to seek subscription for as many shares as possible. You do you.15.5.More cheap shares available through the emission than from sale in the open market. But buying wherever one can get one's fill for cheapest.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt