2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
32 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 813 | - | - | ||
| 24 096 | - | - | ||
| 20 576 | - | - | ||
| 100 000 | - | - | ||
| 55 328 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 |
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·3 päivää sittenThere isn't much time left of Q3 if they are to launch the demo platform. Are they again too optimistic or do we believe that they are on track? I must honestly say that I will be disappointed if they don't deliver on this as it was their very clear goal.
They have already launched the demo, haven't they? They said so in the report, didn't they?
13.8. · MuokattuThe commentary by Impala Nordic (this time by a senior writer) is a good writeup of our current scenario, IMO. Concise, balanced and on point.1 päivä sittenWe should at least meet the CTO and hear what he/they are developing. C-suite have failed to sell the product with sufficient progress as is, and the investement-case now rests largely on CTO and technical staff, and their ability to innovate/adapt. I don't listen much to anything out of JL anyomre. He has shown repeatedly that he has no aptitude for predicting outcomes relating to this product or this sector. I still think he's been chaos-piloting this company while wearing a blindfold.- 12.8.Wasn't expecting much from the quarter, so not surprised. Stagnant, and with normal fluctuations. As far as changes to the platform, I'll be very curious about what and why: What are thehy changing, and why are they changing it? Is this another "bait and switch", dangling more "shiny" around the corner to distract from the lack of anything shiny now, or do they actually have firm, sensible, intelligent reasoning behind the changes they are making? Couldn't sell if I wanted to, so will be around to find out :(Impala Nordic's report commentary was nuanced and worth reading. Among other things, the following is summarized and commented on: "What is required for black figures With a gross margin of around 55 percent, approximately 0.9 MSEK in additional quarterly revenue is required to reach adjusted EBITDA break-even at an unchanged cost base, about 31 KUSD higher MRR, or a level around 236 KUSD. If capitalized work is excluded, the requirement rises to approximately 315 KUSD. The range shows how much of the profitability narrative rests on capitalization, and why MRR is the report's most important line." "Cash, burn rate and runway Cash and cash equivalents amounted to 7.8 MSEK, adjusted by the Company to 9 MSEK for LEO liquidity and a customer payment in July. The adjustment is reasonable but should be read for what it is, funds that were not yet available on the balance sheet date. Cash flow from operating activities was -5.9 MSEK, but the majority is working capital. Cleared for working capital, the result and non-cash flow affecting items yield -1.2 MSEK, and with investments of -1.4 MSEK, costs land around 0.9 MSEK per month, a runway of approximately eleven months on adjusted cash. However, this pace is not representative. If only indirect emission costs are normalized, costs decrease to 0.80 MSEK per month, and if the abnormal personnel item is also normalized to 0.65 MSEK, this gives a runway of 12 to 15 months. The counterweight is that platform consultants remain into Q3 and that capitalized development increased from 0.9 to 1.3 MSEK between quarters. The income statement's cost pace falls faster than the cash's." "Valuation, triggers and conclusion With an ARR around 24 MSEK and a market capitalization of 32 MSEK, today's share price corresponds to a valuation of approximately 24 MSEK after net cash, or approximately 1.0 times ARR, a level that prices in that growth will not materialize. Every öre in share price change moves EV/ARR by approximately 0.25 times, which makes the valuation sensitive in a thinly traded stock. Our conclusion is that the quarter was operationally weak but financially crucial. Divio has bought itself 12 to 15 months and during that time has three things to prove: that the demo is launched in Q3, that MRR turns upwards, and that the cost base normalizes when emission items fall away. If the first two are delivered, there is significant revaluation potential; if they are not, the next financing question quickly approaches."
- 17.7. · MuokattuReading the Avanza post on a "wishlist" for communication from the company. I can't post there, so will post here in hopes someone can relay it. I have three requests: 1. They said they would open up some of their internal KPI's, since they were seeing an increase in activity that had not translated into income yet. Capacity utilization, traffic on the platform, number of projects created etc. They did, briefly, share "beneficial" snapshots of some KPI's, but did it- it seems- to obscure transparency (making look good), instead of actually being transparent. I want frequent updates on relevant KPI's, at regular (once a month) intervals, at least until they have delivered what they said they would 1.5 years ago. 2. I want to hear from their technical staff (CTO, Lucy Linder, or someone else in Switzerland, who is directly/closely involved in the platform and day-to-day operations) what they are doing in terms of adapting the platform for the agency strategy. What are the new functions or the new design choices, and why/what about it will be appealing (irresistible) to agencies? 3. I want to hear if they are exploring additional opportunities stemming from the fact that they now have a network of 50+ agencies attached. Surely, there must be ideas about other benefits they could offer to- or garner from this network. The network is a growing number of agencies with Divio at the centre. That is clearly a resource. For example: A "specialist surplus capacity hub" is one idea. Divio could probably quite easily facilitate a marketplace- formal or informal- that could beneift all members/users of the platform. Smaller agencies- who might often find themselves "out of work", between projects, and have spare DEV-capacity- could post their availability, CV's and rates, and/or larger agencies could outsource non-sensitive tasks/assignments, at fixed prices, to relieve periodic overburden, and increase capacity/efficiency in their busiest periods. Idea is a "matchmaker" between agencies that in a given period have too much to do, with agencies that in the same period have too little to do. "Worksharing" like this could probably work for some projects/functions, and especially when most users of the Divio platform are Django specialists, right? Not saying that this particular idea is a good one, because I really don't know if it's practically viable, or something the partners would actually want/use. I'm merely pointing out what should be obvious- that there is sure to be plenty of ways to add value to a network like the one that is forming, and that they should look into unlocking more of it. Technical staff with backgrounds working in/for agencies could probably drum up plenty of good ideas! Some such initiative could be a win/win for all parties involved, offer extra incentive to signing up with Divio and cement the active usage of the platform, while also bolstering and increasing the relevance of the whole little "ecosystem" that might form (and is more and more likely to form) through any additional added benefit. Again, from the template I hope that Divio will adapt: The more success Divio can unlock for their clients/partners, the more success that unlocks for Divio. The network is already forming, and that network is/can be/should be a resource! Offer something more to pick up pace and to make sure it grows! Thanks in advance for relaying my ramblings under the Avanza post, if you will bother.20.7.Thanks, Vinfredag, for realying to avanza forum, and thanks to Bastionen for initiating communication on the topic!
- 26.6. · Muokattu"They do the work, and we do the complaining".. Regarding the incentives-program for management: The pie is still shrinking(!) and they are setting up to award themselves a bigger piece of that shrinking pie(!) How about the inverse- an incentives-program for investors, i.e. a dividend? Off course that is untinkable and undoable while the company is still unprofitable. Underperforming, repeatedly missing the targets they outline (and damned near promise/guarantee) in their communication to investors should not award anything, IMO. So I think that both the optics, and the practical outcomes of this decision are quite bad, whilst the company is still burning cash, and whilst the stock is still in severe depression. For me it's also another sign that there's a lack of accountability here. Mgmt., board and the Levin family (largest shareholders) decoupled from- and out of sync with the rest of the shareholder base. Grumpy, sulky grievance posted on here is about all I can do about it.2.7.Come to think of it, JL joining the board, and this incentives initiative might be clues that they are looking for a new CEO, with him taking on more of an administrative/advisory role. If that is the case, these developments make much more sense. We'll see.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
32 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenThere isn't much time left of Q3 if they are to launch the demo platform. Are they again too optimistic or do we believe that they are on track? I must honestly say that I will be disappointed if they don't deliver on this as it was their very clear goal.They have already launched the demo, haven't they? They said so in the report, didn't they?
- 13.8. · MuokattuThe commentary by Impala Nordic (this time by a senior writer) is a good writeup of our current scenario, IMO. Concise, balanced and on point.1 päivä sittenWe should at least meet the CTO and hear what he/they are developing. C-suite have failed to sell the product with sufficient progress as is, and the investement-case now rests largely on CTO and technical staff, and their ability to innovate/adapt. I don't listen much to anything out of JL anyomre. He has shown repeatedly that he has no aptitude for predicting outcomes relating to this product or this sector. I still think he's been chaos-piloting this company while wearing a blindfold.
- 12.8.Wasn't expecting much from the quarter, so not surprised. Stagnant, and with normal fluctuations. As far as changes to the platform, I'll be very curious about what and why: What are thehy changing, and why are they changing it? Is this another "bait and switch", dangling more "shiny" around the corner to distract from the lack of anything shiny now, or do they actually have firm, sensible, intelligent reasoning behind the changes they are making? Couldn't sell if I wanted to, so will be around to find out :(Impala Nordic's report commentary was nuanced and worth reading. Among other things, the following is summarized and commented on: "What is required for black figures With a gross margin of around 55 percent, approximately 0.9 MSEK in additional quarterly revenue is required to reach adjusted EBITDA break-even at an unchanged cost base, about 31 KUSD higher MRR, or a level around 236 KUSD. If capitalized work is excluded, the requirement rises to approximately 315 KUSD. The range shows how much of the profitability narrative rests on capitalization, and why MRR is the report's most important line." "Cash, burn rate and runway Cash and cash equivalents amounted to 7.8 MSEK, adjusted by the Company to 9 MSEK for LEO liquidity and a customer payment in July. The adjustment is reasonable but should be read for what it is, funds that were not yet available on the balance sheet date. Cash flow from operating activities was -5.9 MSEK, but the majority is working capital. Cleared for working capital, the result and non-cash flow affecting items yield -1.2 MSEK, and with investments of -1.4 MSEK, costs land around 0.9 MSEK per month, a runway of approximately eleven months on adjusted cash. However, this pace is not representative. If only indirect emission costs are normalized, costs decrease to 0.80 MSEK per month, and if the abnormal personnel item is also normalized to 0.65 MSEK, this gives a runway of 12 to 15 months. The counterweight is that platform consultants remain into Q3 and that capitalized development increased from 0.9 to 1.3 MSEK between quarters. The income statement's cost pace falls faster than the cash's." "Valuation, triggers and conclusion With an ARR around 24 MSEK and a market capitalization of 32 MSEK, today's share price corresponds to a valuation of approximately 24 MSEK after net cash, or approximately 1.0 times ARR, a level that prices in that growth will not materialize. Every öre in share price change moves EV/ARR by approximately 0.25 times, which makes the valuation sensitive in a thinly traded stock. Our conclusion is that the quarter was operationally weak but financially crucial. Divio has bought itself 12 to 15 months and during that time has three things to prove: that the demo is launched in Q3, that MRR turns upwards, and that the cost base normalizes when emission items fall away. If the first two are delivered, there is significant revaluation potential; if they are not, the next financing question quickly approaches."
- 17.7. · MuokattuReading the Avanza post on a "wishlist" for communication from the company. I can't post there, so will post here in hopes someone can relay it. I have three requests: 1. They said they would open up some of their internal KPI's, since they were seeing an increase in activity that had not translated into income yet. Capacity utilization, traffic on the platform, number of projects created etc. They did, briefly, share "beneficial" snapshots of some KPI's, but did it- it seems- to obscure transparency (making look good), instead of actually being transparent. I want frequent updates on relevant KPI's, at regular (once a month) intervals, at least until they have delivered what they said they would 1.5 years ago. 2. I want to hear from their technical staff (CTO, Lucy Linder, or someone else in Switzerland, who is directly/closely involved in the platform and day-to-day operations) what they are doing in terms of adapting the platform for the agency strategy. What are the new functions or the new design choices, and why/what about it will be appealing (irresistible) to agencies? 3. I want to hear if they are exploring additional opportunities stemming from the fact that they now have a network of 50+ agencies attached. Surely, there must be ideas about other benefits they could offer to- or garner from this network. The network is a growing number of agencies with Divio at the centre. That is clearly a resource. For example: A "specialist surplus capacity hub" is one idea. Divio could probably quite easily facilitate a marketplace- formal or informal- that could beneift all members/users of the platform. Smaller agencies- who might often find themselves "out of work", between projects, and have spare DEV-capacity- could post their availability, CV's and rates, and/or larger agencies could outsource non-sensitive tasks/assignments, at fixed prices, to relieve periodic overburden, and increase capacity/efficiency in their busiest periods. Idea is a "matchmaker" between agencies that in a given period have too much to do, with agencies that in the same period have too little to do. "Worksharing" like this could probably work for some projects/functions, and especially when most users of the Divio platform are Django specialists, right? Not saying that this particular idea is a good one, because I really don't know if it's practically viable, or something the partners would actually want/use. I'm merely pointing out what should be obvious- that there is sure to be plenty of ways to add value to a network like the one that is forming, and that they should look into unlocking more of it. Technical staff with backgrounds working in/for agencies could probably drum up plenty of good ideas! Some such initiative could be a win/win for all parties involved, offer extra incentive to signing up with Divio and cement the active usage of the platform, while also bolstering and increasing the relevance of the whole little "ecosystem" that might form (and is more and more likely to form) through any additional added benefit. Again, from the template I hope that Divio will adapt: The more success Divio can unlock for their clients/partners, the more success that unlocks for Divio. The network is already forming, and that network is/can be/should be a resource! Offer something more to pick up pace and to make sure it grows! Thanks in advance for relaying my ramblings under the Avanza post, if you will bother.20.7.Thanks, Vinfredag, for realying to avanza forum, and thanks to Bastionen for initiating communication on the topic!
- 26.6. · Muokattu"They do the work, and we do the complaining".. Regarding the incentives-program for management: The pie is still shrinking(!) and they are setting up to award themselves a bigger piece of that shrinking pie(!) How about the inverse- an incentives-program for investors, i.e. a dividend? Off course that is untinkable and undoable while the company is still unprofitable. Underperforming, repeatedly missing the targets they outline (and damned near promise/guarantee) in their communication to investors should not award anything, IMO. So I think that both the optics, and the practical outcomes of this decision are quite bad, whilst the company is still burning cash, and whilst the stock is still in severe depression. For me it's also another sign that there's a lack of accountability here. Mgmt., board and the Levin family (largest shareholders) decoupled from- and out of sync with the rest of the shareholder base. Grumpy, sulky grievance posted on here is about all I can do about it.2.7.Come to think of it, JL joining the board, and this incentives initiative might be clues that they are looking for a new CEO, with him taking on more of an administrative/advisory role. If that is the case, these developments make much more sense. We'll see.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 813 | - | - | ||
| 24 096 | - | - | ||
| 20 576 | - | - | ||
| 100 000 | - | - | ||
| 55 328 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
32 päivää sitten
‧1 t 0 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 4.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenThere isn't much time left of Q3 if they are to launch the demo platform. Are they again too optimistic or do we believe that they are on track? I must honestly say that I will be disappointed if they don't deliver on this as it was their very clear goal.They have already launched the demo, haven't they? They said so in the report, didn't they?
- 13.8. · MuokattuThe commentary by Impala Nordic (this time by a senior writer) is a good writeup of our current scenario, IMO. Concise, balanced and on point.1 päivä sittenWe should at least meet the CTO and hear what he/they are developing. C-suite have failed to sell the product with sufficient progress as is, and the investement-case now rests largely on CTO and technical staff, and their ability to innovate/adapt. I don't listen much to anything out of JL anyomre. He has shown repeatedly that he has no aptitude for predicting outcomes relating to this product or this sector. I still think he's been chaos-piloting this company while wearing a blindfold.
- 12.8.Wasn't expecting much from the quarter, so not surprised. Stagnant, and with normal fluctuations. As far as changes to the platform, I'll be very curious about what and why: What are thehy changing, and why are they changing it? Is this another "bait and switch", dangling more "shiny" around the corner to distract from the lack of anything shiny now, or do they actually have firm, sensible, intelligent reasoning behind the changes they are making? Couldn't sell if I wanted to, so will be around to find out :(Impala Nordic's report commentary was nuanced and worth reading. Among other things, the following is summarized and commented on: "What is required for black figures With a gross margin of around 55 percent, approximately 0.9 MSEK in additional quarterly revenue is required to reach adjusted EBITDA break-even at an unchanged cost base, about 31 KUSD higher MRR, or a level around 236 KUSD. If capitalized work is excluded, the requirement rises to approximately 315 KUSD. The range shows how much of the profitability narrative rests on capitalization, and why MRR is the report's most important line." "Cash, burn rate and runway Cash and cash equivalents amounted to 7.8 MSEK, adjusted by the Company to 9 MSEK for LEO liquidity and a customer payment in July. The adjustment is reasonable but should be read for what it is, funds that were not yet available on the balance sheet date. Cash flow from operating activities was -5.9 MSEK, but the majority is working capital. Cleared for working capital, the result and non-cash flow affecting items yield -1.2 MSEK, and with investments of -1.4 MSEK, costs land around 0.9 MSEK per month, a runway of approximately eleven months on adjusted cash. However, this pace is not representative. If only indirect emission costs are normalized, costs decrease to 0.80 MSEK per month, and if the abnormal personnel item is also normalized to 0.65 MSEK, this gives a runway of 12 to 15 months. The counterweight is that platform consultants remain into Q3 and that capitalized development increased from 0.9 to 1.3 MSEK between quarters. The income statement's cost pace falls faster than the cash's." "Valuation, triggers and conclusion With an ARR around 24 MSEK and a market capitalization of 32 MSEK, today's share price corresponds to a valuation of approximately 24 MSEK after net cash, or approximately 1.0 times ARR, a level that prices in that growth will not materialize. Every öre in share price change moves EV/ARR by approximately 0.25 times, which makes the valuation sensitive in a thinly traded stock. Our conclusion is that the quarter was operationally weak but financially crucial. Divio has bought itself 12 to 15 months and during that time has three things to prove: that the demo is launched in Q3, that MRR turns upwards, and that the cost base normalizes when emission items fall away. If the first two are delivered, there is significant revaluation potential; if they are not, the next financing question quickly approaches."
- 17.7. · MuokattuReading the Avanza post on a "wishlist" for communication from the company. I can't post there, so will post here in hopes someone can relay it. I have three requests: 1. They said they would open up some of their internal KPI's, since they were seeing an increase in activity that had not translated into income yet. Capacity utilization, traffic on the platform, number of projects created etc. They did, briefly, share "beneficial" snapshots of some KPI's, but did it- it seems- to obscure transparency (making look good), instead of actually being transparent. I want frequent updates on relevant KPI's, at regular (once a month) intervals, at least until they have delivered what they said they would 1.5 years ago. 2. I want to hear from their technical staff (CTO, Lucy Linder, or someone else in Switzerland, who is directly/closely involved in the platform and day-to-day operations) what they are doing in terms of adapting the platform for the agency strategy. What are the new functions or the new design choices, and why/what about it will be appealing (irresistible) to agencies? 3. I want to hear if they are exploring additional opportunities stemming from the fact that they now have a network of 50+ agencies attached. Surely, there must be ideas about other benefits they could offer to- or garner from this network. The network is a growing number of agencies with Divio at the centre. That is clearly a resource. For example: A "specialist surplus capacity hub" is one idea. Divio could probably quite easily facilitate a marketplace- formal or informal- that could beneift all members/users of the platform. Smaller agencies- who might often find themselves "out of work", between projects, and have spare DEV-capacity- could post their availability, CV's and rates, and/or larger agencies could outsource non-sensitive tasks/assignments, at fixed prices, to relieve periodic overburden, and increase capacity/efficiency in their busiest periods. Idea is a "matchmaker" between agencies that in a given period have too much to do, with agencies that in the same period have too little to do. "Worksharing" like this could probably work for some projects/functions, and especially when most users of the Divio platform are Django specialists, right? Not saying that this particular idea is a good one, because I really don't know if it's practically viable, or something the partners would actually want/use. I'm merely pointing out what should be obvious- that there is sure to be plenty of ways to add value to a network like the one that is forming, and that they should look into unlocking more of it. Technical staff with backgrounds working in/for agencies could probably drum up plenty of good ideas! Some such initiative could be a win/win for all parties involved, offer extra incentive to signing up with Divio and cement the active usage of the platform, while also bolstering and increasing the relevance of the whole little "ecosystem" that might form (and is more and more likely to form) through any additional added benefit. Again, from the template I hope that Divio will adapt: The more success Divio can unlock for their clients/partners, the more success that unlocks for Divio. The network is already forming, and that network is/can be/should be a resource! Offer something more to pick up pace and to make sure it grows! Thanks in advance for relaying my ramblings under the Avanza post, if you will bother.20.7.Thanks, Vinfredag, for realying to avanza forum, and thanks to Bastionen for initiating communication on the topic!
- 26.6. · Muokattu"They do the work, and we do the complaining".. Regarding the incentives-program for management: The pie is still shrinking(!) and they are setting up to award themselves a bigger piece of that shrinking pie(!) How about the inverse- an incentives-program for investors, i.e. a dividend? Off course that is untinkable and undoable while the company is still unprofitable. Underperforming, repeatedly missing the targets they outline (and damned near promise/guarantee) in their communication to investors should not award anything, IMO. So I think that both the optics, and the practical outcomes of this decision are quite bad, whilst the company is still burning cash, and whilst the stock is still in severe depression. For me it's also another sign that there's a lack of accountability here. Mgmt., board and the Levin family (largest shareholders) decoupled from- and out of sync with the rest of the shareholder base. Grumpy, sulky grievance posted on here is about all I can do about it.2.7.Come to think of it, JL joining the board, and this incentives initiative might be clues that they are looking for a new CEO, with him taking on more of an administrative/advisory role. If that is the case, these developments make much more sense. We'll see.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 813 | - | - | ||
| 24 096 | - | - | ||
| 20 576 | - | - | ||
| 100 000 | - | - | ||
| 55 328 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt