2026 H2 - tulosraportti
76 päivää sitten
‧1 t 3 min
0,7246 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2027 Q1 - tulosraportti 29.10. | 7 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H2 - tulosraportti 7.8. | ||
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 12.5. | ||
2026 H1 - tulosraportti 13.2. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 20.11.2025 | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 21.10.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·1 päivä sittenUp 7,5%. Anything new?
We cannot rely on US companies, but must develop technologies ourselves in Europe. Eutelsat is one of these. It is far too risky to have critical infrastructure that Trump or his successor can shut down at will.
3 päivää sittenInvesting.com -- Goldman Sachs message is clearly negative for Eutelsat Communications SA (ETL). Analysts argue that management’s FY27–FY29 growth targets are too optimistic, while the company has repeatedly disappointed since the OneWeb merger in 2023. What GS sees Guidance credibility: FY27 EBITDA guidance, issued in August, was 7% below consensus at that time. Growth hurdle: Mid-term guidance implies roughly 8%–9% revenue CAGR across FY27–FY29. Historical contrast: Revenue growth peaked at only 2% across FY20–FY26A. Near-term tension: Management expects only "slight" growth in FY27, making the later acceleration look demanding. Forecast gap: GS’s FY29 EBITDA forecast is 2% below consensus and 13% below the low end of management’s mid-term target. Why it matters The issue is not one weak quarter. It is a credibility gap between ambitious long-term targets and a history of negative guidance surprises. A simple way to read the argument: Eutelsat is being asked to move from roughly stagnant historical growth to high-single-digit growth, while near-term guidance still indicates only slight expansion. That makes the FY29 target particularly vulnerable if satellite connectivity demand, pricing, execution, or OneWeb integration progresses slowly. Bull versus bear Bull case: OneWeb integration could eventually unlock stronger broadband growth, improving the company’s revenue mix and operating leverage. Bear case: If FY27 remains weak, investors may reduce confidence in the entire mid-term plan. That could pressure valuation before the FY29 targets are even tested. Bottom line GS is effectively saying: the forecast recovery is too ambitious, and the downside risk comes from repeated guidance cuts rather than a single disappointing result. The most important monitoring point is whether Eutelsat delivers evidence of acceleration during FY27. Without that, the company’s 8%–9% revenue-growth assumption may look more like an aspiration than a forecast.- ·3 päivää sittenWallstreet online article from yesterday about etl: With a weekly increase of 27.5 percent, Eutelsat Communications ranks among the week's most notable stocks. In the community, it is being discussed what is driving the price increase and how long it might last. A 27.5 percent increase over the week has placed the Eutelsat Communications stock at the center of lively discussions on the wallstreetONLINE forum. The starting point was the news about restrictions on Starlink services for the Ukrainian army, which caused the share stock price to rise on Wednesday. The central question is: Can Eutelsat - via OneWeb - benefit from the hunt for a European alternative, or are market speculations getting ahead of the actual business opportunities? OneWeb: a quick replacement or a limited supplement? According to forum users, the strongest argument is the strategic importance of a satellite communication system that is less dependent on decisions made in the USA. Several posts suggest that the restrictions on Starlink could increase Europe's willingness to finance and use its own capabilities. Forum participants see Eutelsat as a potential winner, as they believe OneWeb can form the basis for additional communication services. This hope becomes more concrete when looking at a potential application in Ukraine. Discussions revolve around mobile terminals, military communication, and the transfer of control data. Some participants believe that a targeted supplement to Starlink is more realistic than a complete replacement. Press coverage mentioned in the forum – regarding European plans for additional capacity – supports this expectation, at least in the eyes of optimists. However, this is not a confirmed order or a measurable contribution to revenue. Assessments of the technical potential vary considerably. Proponents point out that, according to them, it is already possible to provide internet access to airplanes, and they infer from this that the technology is also suitable for other mobile applications. More skeptical observers, however, distinguish between specific communication tasks and the coverage of an entire war zone. Whether network capacity, terminals, and resistance to interference are sufficient for such purposes remains an open question in the debate. Furthermore, data transfer should not be equated with data acquisition through reconnaissance. Strategic importance is no guarantee of profit The primary economic counterargument is that a new political emergency does not automatically lead to short-term returns. Persistent doubts remain as to whether these expectations can be quickly translated into a profitable business. From the investors' perspective, there is also a need for significant capital requirements – not least in connection with the IRIS² program. The financing figures and implementation steps mentioned in the forum should not be regarded as verified corporate data. Another reservation relates to how long the current, news-driven momentum will last. If the restrictions on Starlink are lifted, some of the short-term optimism regarding a potential provider switch could wane. Political disagreements in Europe are likewise considered a potential obstacle. The share price has already exhibited significant volatility: Despite a strong weekly increase, the stock fell by 7.86 percent on October 15. A recent trading volume that is 2.3 times higher than the weekly average testifies to increased interest, but does not necessarily confirm a lasting change in market sentiment. Therefore, the focus in the coming week will be on concrete announcements regarding additional European capacity, potential contracts, and the financing thereof. As for the share price, the week's highest quotation of 1.858 euros acts as the next resistance level, while the week's lowest quotation of 1.3555 euros constitutes the relevant support level. The decisive question remains whether geopolitical attention will be followed by concrete business progress.
·16.10."Musk approached Trump to slow down Starlink in Ukraine SpaceX founder had publicly blamed president for chaos over restrictions, but sources say he initiated them" This just shows how necessary a European alternative is. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/10/16/musk-approached-trump-slow-down-starlink-help-ukraine/
17.10.Yep shouldnt be bad week for ETL coming. But doesnt feel right, very sorry for ukrainians.
·16.10.Can feel that I just need to follow this.... think it might have potential going forward!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 H2 - tulosraportti
76 päivää sitten
‧1 t 3 min
0,7246 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·1 päivä sittenUp 7,5%. Anything new?We cannot rely on US companies, but must develop technologies ourselves in Europe. Eutelsat is one of these. It is far too risky to have critical infrastructure that Trump or his successor can shut down at will.
- 3 päivää sittenInvesting.com -- Goldman Sachs message is clearly negative for Eutelsat Communications SA (ETL). Analysts argue that management’s FY27–FY29 growth targets are too optimistic, while the company has repeatedly disappointed since the OneWeb merger in 2023. What GS sees Guidance credibility: FY27 EBITDA guidance, issued in August, was 7% below consensus at that time. Growth hurdle: Mid-term guidance implies roughly 8%–9% revenue CAGR across FY27–FY29. Historical contrast: Revenue growth peaked at only 2% across FY20–FY26A. Near-term tension: Management expects only "slight" growth in FY27, making the later acceleration look demanding. Forecast gap: GS’s FY29 EBITDA forecast is 2% below consensus and 13% below the low end of management’s mid-term target. Why it matters The issue is not one weak quarter. It is a credibility gap between ambitious long-term targets and a history of negative guidance surprises. A simple way to read the argument: Eutelsat is being asked to move from roughly stagnant historical growth to high-single-digit growth, while near-term guidance still indicates only slight expansion. That makes the FY29 target particularly vulnerable if satellite connectivity demand, pricing, execution, or OneWeb integration progresses slowly. Bull versus bear Bull case: OneWeb integration could eventually unlock stronger broadband growth, improving the company’s revenue mix and operating leverage. Bear case: If FY27 remains weak, investors may reduce confidence in the entire mid-term plan. That could pressure valuation before the FY29 targets are even tested. Bottom line GS is effectively saying: the forecast recovery is too ambitious, and the downside risk comes from repeated guidance cuts rather than a single disappointing result. The most important monitoring point is whether Eutelsat delivers evidence of acceleration during FY27. Without that, the company’s 8%–9% revenue-growth assumption may look more like an aspiration than a forecast.
- ·3 päivää sittenWallstreet online article from yesterday about etl: With a weekly increase of 27.5 percent, Eutelsat Communications ranks among the week's most notable stocks. In the community, it is being discussed what is driving the price increase and how long it might last. A 27.5 percent increase over the week has placed the Eutelsat Communications stock at the center of lively discussions on the wallstreetONLINE forum. The starting point was the news about restrictions on Starlink services for the Ukrainian army, which caused the share stock price to rise on Wednesday. The central question is: Can Eutelsat - via OneWeb - benefit from the hunt for a European alternative, or are market speculations getting ahead of the actual business opportunities? OneWeb: a quick replacement or a limited supplement? According to forum users, the strongest argument is the strategic importance of a satellite communication system that is less dependent on decisions made in the USA. Several posts suggest that the restrictions on Starlink could increase Europe's willingness to finance and use its own capabilities. Forum participants see Eutelsat as a potential winner, as they believe OneWeb can form the basis for additional communication services. This hope becomes more concrete when looking at a potential application in Ukraine. Discussions revolve around mobile terminals, military communication, and the transfer of control data. Some participants believe that a targeted supplement to Starlink is more realistic than a complete replacement. Press coverage mentioned in the forum – regarding European plans for additional capacity – supports this expectation, at least in the eyes of optimists. However, this is not a confirmed order or a measurable contribution to revenue. Assessments of the technical potential vary considerably. Proponents point out that, according to them, it is already possible to provide internet access to airplanes, and they infer from this that the technology is also suitable for other mobile applications. More skeptical observers, however, distinguish between specific communication tasks and the coverage of an entire war zone. Whether network capacity, terminals, and resistance to interference are sufficient for such purposes remains an open question in the debate. Furthermore, data transfer should not be equated with data acquisition through reconnaissance. Strategic importance is no guarantee of profit The primary economic counterargument is that a new political emergency does not automatically lead to short-term returns. Persistent doubts remain as to whether these expectations can be quickly translated into a profitable business. From the investors' perspective, there is also a need for significant capital requirements – not least in connection with the IRIS² program. The financing figures and implementation steps mentioned in the forum should not be regarded as verified corporate data. Another reservation relates to how long the current, news-driven momentum will last. If the restrictions on Starlink are lifted, some of the short-term optimism regarding a potential provider switch could wane. Political disagreements in Europe are likewise considered a potential obstacle. The share price has already exhibited significant volatility: Despite a strong weekly increase, the stock fell by 7.86 percent on October 15. A recent trading volume that is 2.3 times higher than the weekly average testifies to increased interest, but does not necessarily confirm a lasting change in market sentiment. Therefore, the focus in the coming week will be on concrete announcements regarding additional European capacity, potential contracts, and the financing thereof. As for the share price, the week's highest quotation of 1.858 euros acts as the next resistance level, while the week's lowest quotation of 1.3555 euros constitutes the relevant support level. The decisive question remains whether geopolitical attention will be followed by concrete business progress.
- ·16.10."Musk approached Trump to slow down Starlink in Ukraine SpaceX founder had publicly blamed president for chaos over restrictions, but sources say he initiated them" This just shows how necessary a European alternative is. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/10/16/musk-approached-trump-slow-down-starlink-help-ukraine/17.10.Yep shouldnt be bad week for ETL coming. But doesnt feel right, very sorry for ukrainians.
- ·16.10.Can feel that I just need to follow this.... think it might have potential going forward!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2027 Q1 - tulosraportti 29.10. | 7 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H2 - tulosraportti 7.8. | ||
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 12.5. | ||
2026 H1 - tulosraportti 13.2. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 20.11.2025 | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 21.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 H2 - tulosraportti
76 päivää sitten
‧1 t 3 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2027 Q1 - tulosraportti 29.10. | 7 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H2 - tulosraportti 7.8. | ||
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 12.5. | ||
2026 H1 - tulosraportti 13.2. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 20.11.2025 | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 21.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
0,7246 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·1 päivä sittenUp 7,5%. Anything new?We cannot rely on US companies, but must develop technologies ourselves in Europe. Eutelsat is one of these. It is far too risky to have critical infrastructure that Trump or his successor can shut down at will.
- 3 päivää sittenInvesting.com -- Goldman Sachs message is clearly negative for Eutelsat Communications SA (ETL). Analysts argue that management’s FY27–FY29 growth targets are too optimistic, while the company has repeatedly disappointed since the OneWeb merger in 2023. What GS sees Guidance credibility: FY27 EBITDA guidance, issued in August, was 7% below consensus at that time. Growth hurdle: Mid-term guidance implies roughly 8%–9% revenue CAGR across FY27–FY29. Historical contrast: Revenue growth peaked at only 2% across FY20–FY26A. Near-term tension: Management expects only "slight" growth in FY27, making the later acceleration look demanding. Forecast gap: GS’s FY29 EBITDA forecast is 2% below consensus and 13% below the low end of management’s mid-term target. Why it matters The issue is not one weak quarter. It is a credibility gap between ambitious long-term targets and a history of negative guidance surprises. A simple way to read the argument: Eutelsat is being asked to move from roughly stagnant historical growth to high-single-digit growth, while near-term guidance still indicates only slight expansion. That makes the FY29 target particularly vulnerable if satellite connectivity demand, pricing, execution, or OneWeb integration progresses slowly. Bull versus bear Bull case: OneWeb integration could eventually unlock stronger broadband growth, improving the company’s revenue mix and operating leverage. Bear case: If FY27 remains weak, investors may reduce confidence in the entire mid-term plan. That could pressure valuation before the FY29 targets are even tested. Bottom line GS is effectively saying: the forecast recovery is too ambitious, and the downside risk comes from repeated guidance cuts rather than a single disappointing result. The most important monitoring point is whether Eutelsat delivers evidence of acceleration during FY27. Without that, the company’s 8%–9% revenue-growth assumption may look more like an aspiration than a forecast.
- ·3 päivää sittenWallstreet online article from yesterday about etl: With a weekly increase of 27.5 percent, Eutelsat Communications ranks among the week's most notable stocks. In the community, it is being discussed what is driving the price increase and how long it might last. A 27.5 percent increase over the week has placed the Eutelsat Communications stock at the center of lively discussions on the wallstreetONLINE forum. The starting point was the news about restrictions on Starlink services for the Ukrainian army, which caused the share stock price to rise on Wednesday. The central question is: Can Eutelsat - via OneWeb - benefit from the hunt for a European alternative, or are market speculations getting ahead of the actual business opportunities? OneWeb: a quick replacement or a limited supplement? According to forum users, the strongest argument is the strategic importance of a satellite communication system that is less dependent on decisions made in the USA. Several posts suggest that the restrictions on Starlink could increase Europe's willingness to finance and use its own capabilities. Forum participants see Eutelsat as a potential winner, as they believe OneWeb can form the basis for additional communication services. This hope becomes more concrete when looking at a potential application in Ukraine. Discussions revolve around mobile terminals, military communication, and the transfer of control data. Some participants believe that a targeted supplement to Starlink is more realistic than a complete replacement. Press coverage mentioned in the forum – regarding European plans for additional capacity – supports this expectation, at least in the eyes of optimists. However, this is not a confirmed order or a measurable contribution to revenue. Assessments of the technical potential vary considerably. Proponents point out that, according to them, it is already possible to provide internet access to airplanes, and they infer from this that the technology is also suitable for other mobile applications. More skeptical observers, however, distinguish between specific communication tasks and the coverage of an entire war zone. Whether network capacity, terminals, and resistance to interference are sufficient for such purposes remains an open question in the debate. Furthermore, data transfer should not be equated with data acquisition through reconnaissance. Strategic importance is no guarantee of profit The primary economic counterargument is that a new political emergency does not automatically lead to short-term returns. Persistent doubts remain as to whether these expectations can be quickly translated into a profitable business. From the investors' perspective, there is also a need for significant capital requirements – not least in connection with the IRIS² program. The financing figures and implementation steps mentioned in the forum should not be regarded as verified corporate data. Another reservation relates to how long the current, news-driven momentum will last. If the restrictions on Starlink are lifted, some of the short-term optimism regarding a potential provider switch could wane. Political disagreements in Europe are likewise considered a potential obstacle. The share price has already exhibited significant volatility: Despite a strong weekly increase, the stock fell by 7.86 percent on October 15. A recent trading volume that is 2.3 times higher than the weekly average testifies to increased interest, but does not necessarily confirm a lasting change in market sentiment. Therefore, the focus in the coming week will be on concrete announcements regarding additional European capacity, potential contracts, and the financing thereof. As for the share price, the week's highest quotation of 1.858 euros acts as the next resistance level, while the week's lowest quotation of 1.3555 euros constitutes the relevant support level. The decisive question remains whether geopolitical attention will be followed by concrete business progress.
- ·16.10."Musk approached Trump to slow down Starlink in Ukraine SpaceX founder had publicly blamed president for chaos over restrictions, but sources say he initiated them" This just shows how necessary a European alternative is. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/10/16/musk-approached-trump-slow-down-starlink-help-ukraine/17.10.Yep shouldnt be bad week for ETL coming. But doesnt feel right, very sorry for ukrainians.
- ·16.10.Can feel that I just need to follow this.... think it might have potential going forward!
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt