2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
7 päivää sitten
‧56 min
Tarjoustasot
First North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 406 | - | - | ||
| 26 787 | - | - | ||
| 11 737 | - | - | ||
| 1 524 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 40 454 | 40 454 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 40 454 | 40 454 | 0 | 0 |
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
1 t sitten · Muokattu1 t sitten · MuokattuSo, I had a friend test the platform. He had some good things to say: It's modern, intuitive, comfortable and very easy to use. (He was using it straight away, and didn't need to read up, look for guides, or experiment to understand the functions.) It saved him lots of time making some simple applications for his hobby-projects. My friend thinks the Divio-platform easily measures up to Heroku, "back when Heroku was good" (his words, not mine.) Asked if he would use it for his own applications, his answer was "probably not". Mainly because the $25 p/month entry-level subscription is pricey compared to alternatives he can use, when his hobby projects are not intended to ever generate revenue. Asked if he would have reccommended it for use for companies where he has worked, his answer was "no", citing a specific security-concern that he encountered as reason. I relayed that issue to management two days ago. Haven't heard back from them, but we'll see if they deem it relevant. So all in all, a bit of a mixed bag for our review.- 12.3. · Muokattu12.3. · MuokattuJust reviewed the quarterly, after work. Not enthused by the writedown or the shareprice-response, but I believe in the current strategy and the adjustments that have been made to adapt to our current market circumstances. Adaptations to that market were a bit too slow, but I understand why: You have lots of sunk costs- time, money, effort and intentions- connected to the AWS pipeline, and you wouldn't want it to go to waste. So you stuck to it while the world changed rapidly, and unpredictably. The company, with limited resources- and while onboarding Roche- were only sligthly slow to adjust to these swiftly changing realities, and now stands to gain from the adjustments they've made. Also, the "accelerated partner"-status with AWS- achieved through the former strategy- is still there, and will likely yield better at a later point, when U.S. policy regains some reliability/sanity- if "adults in the room" (U.S. congress) face up to what their actual responsibilities are- something they will likely have to do shortly, since a new war was initiated without national/international legal merit, without congressional support, and since the U.S. constitution demands that congress evaluate and judge predicaments like this within 60 days. (There's very little public support for what is happening, and each member of congress has to choose: Stand with the delusional moron who made the abysmal decision, or face the consequences, and public backlash, come midterm elections in November.) Also blowing my horn a bit with the following, but as the current market discussion and my history of posting/predicting these issues might indicate: I've been on to something relevant with most of my posts here. I think I'm still on to something now, and I'm not going to be shy or modest about it: I know buyers are needed to provide liquidity/support the share price, but I also think buying these levles will be profitable. Divio have faced the abyss on multiple fronts- and one after the other- since their IPO: Deterioration of the financial markets and their acess to capital (as an immature growth-company), and then the consecutive deterioration of their actual market- the transatlantic cloud market- after. Yet they have pulled through and still achieved an EPS of -0.01 SEK, and a positive EBIT for 2025. Growth has occurred- and is occurring. Transparency has increased, at least partially, and the company's strategy makes sense for what is happening politically (U.S. tensions) and technologically (Vibe coding etc.) The past is all at a loss for any/all shareholders of Divio, but I still think we'll be gainers from where we are now. I had- and still have- reservations about the C-suite and board + their communication to investors, but I will still be a buyer of the stock, with the uncertainties that likely follow from the Q4 2025 report. I hope you will be too, to make the journey somewhat smoother price-wise. (It's just us: Market makers and retail investors trading in the stock- until a larger mcap and an eventual uplisting might be achieved.) I'll also be speaking to my friend, who is reviewing the platform's functionality, this weekend, and will provide you with an update from that conversation soon. Todeloo!13.3.13.3.Sorry for being sloppy on the details in this post. *Meant EBITDA positive, not EBIT, and EPS is -0.02, not - 0.01, which I wrote.
·10.3.I asked a SaaS owner what he thought about Divio technology, as I was concerned if it was truly cutting-edge. Here's what he answered, and it confirms to me once again that AI does not threaten Divio but rather helps them. Answer: Regarding Divio, I don't know the company that well, but technologically it makes sense. Divio is like sitting on the infrastructure layer beneath web apps, and that means the AI wave actually creates more demand for exactly that. Everyone building AI-driven apps needs scalable cloud infrastructure, and that's Divio's core competence as I read it. The risk is more competition than tech development. Microsoft, AWS, Google and IBM dominate the PaaS market for AI workloads!!! But yes, good spot, I shouldn't give investment advice though - so whether it's a good or bad investment, I'll stay far away from advising on that 😅😁10.3.10.3.I'm getting a review of the platform also, from a childhood friend who is a high level developer. I'll post when he's done some testing.·10.3.I look forward to reading it. Always good with new input from credible sources who actually know what they're talking about. (I have a pretty good grasp of accounts and numbers, but know nothing about AI, saas, PaaS etc.) but I have been confirmed by the partnerships they have made so far.- ·3.3.In 1 month, a gain of 2000usd has been delivered. Conservatively estimated, they will therefore grow with this new strategy alone by 24000usd per year. This is going to be good!·4.3.I need to just adjust my very quick assumptions on the agency growth. My assumption is that they increase around 2000usd every month. If this increase continues throughout all of 2026, it will mean an additional growth of 150.000usd. Corresponding to an MRR growth (and not ARR as mentioned further up) at the end of the year of a total of 24.000usd. I certainly don't think that's unlikely.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
7 päivää sitten
‧56 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 1 t sitten · Muokattu1 t sitten · MuokattuSo, I had a friend test the platform. He had some good things to say: It's modern, intuitive, comfortable and very easy to use. (He was using it straight away, and didn't need to read up, look for guides, or experiment to understand the functions.) It saved him lots of time making some simple applications for his hobby-projects. My friend thinks the Divio-platform easily measures up to Heroku, "back when Heroku was good" (his words, not mine.) Asked if he would use it for his own applications, his answer was "probably not". Mainly because the $25 p/month entry-level subscription is pricey compared to alternatives he can use, when his hobby projects are not intended to ever generate revenue. Asked if he would have reccommended it for use for companies where he has worked, his answer was "no", citing a specific security-concern that he encountered as reason. I relayed that issue to management two days ago. Haven't heard back from them, but we'll see if they deem it relevant. So all in all, a bit of a mixed bag for our review.
- 12.3. · Muokattu12.3. · MuokattuJust reviewed the quarterly, after work. Not enthused by the writedown or the shareprice-response, but I believe in the current strategy and the adjustments that have been made to adapt to our current market circumstances. Adaptations to that market were a bit too slow, but I understand why: You have lots of sunk costs- time, money, effort and intentions- connected to the AWS pipeline, and you wouldn't want it to go to waste. So you stuck to it while the world changed rapidly, and unpredictably. The company, with limited resources- and while onboarding Roche- were only sligthly slow to adjust to these swiftly changing realities, and now stands to gain from the adjustments they've made. Also, the "accelerated partner"-status with AWS- achieved through the former strategy- is still there, and will likely yield better at a later point, when U.S. policy regains some reliability/sanity- if "adults in the room" (U.S. congress) face up to what their actual responsibilities are- something they will likely have to do shortly, since a new war was initiated without national/international legal merit, without congressional support, and since the U.S. constitution demands that congress evaluate and judge predicaments like this within 60 days. (There's very little public support for what is happening, and each member of congress has to choose: Stand with the delusional moron who made the abysmal decision, or face the consequences, and public backlash, come midterm elections in November.) Also blowing my horn a bit with the following, but as the current market discussion and my history of posting/predicting these issues might indicate: I've been on to something relevant with most of my posts here. I think I'm still on to something now, and I'm not going to be shy or modest about it: I know buyers are needed to provide liquidity/support the share price, but I also think buying these levles will be profitable. Divio have faced the abyss on multiple fronts- and one after the other- since their IPO: Deterioration of the financial markets and their acess to capital (as an immature growth-company), and then the consecutive deterioration of their actual market- the transatlantic cloud market- after. Yet they have pulled through and still achieved an EPS of -0.01 SEK, and a positive EBIT for 2025. Growth has occurred- and is occurring. Transparency has increased, at least partially, and the company's strategy makes sense for what is happening politically (U.S. tensions) and technologically (Vibe coding etc.) The past is all at a loss for any/all shareholders of Divio, but I still think we'll be gainers from where we are now. I had- and still have- reservations about the C-suite and board + their communication to investors, but I will still be a buyer of the stock, with the uncertainties that likely follow from the Q4 2025 report. I hope you will be too, to make the journey somewhat smoother price-wise. (It's just us: Market makers and retail investors trading in the stock- until a larger mcap and an eventual uplisting might be achieved.) I'll also be speaking to my friend, who is reviewing the platform's functionality, this weekend, and will provide you with an update from that conversation soon. Todeloo!13.3.13.3.Sorry for being sloppy on the details in this post. *Meant EBITDA positive, not EBIT, and EPS is -0.02, not - 0.01, which I wrote.
- ·10.3.I asked a SaaS owner what he thought about Divio technology, as I was concerned if it was truly cutting-edge. Here's what he answered, and it confirms to me once again that AI does not threaten Divio but rather helps them. Answer: Regarding Divio, I don't know the company that well, but technologically it makes sense. Divio is like sitting on the infrastructure layer beneath web apps, and that means the AI wave actually creates more demand for exactly that. Everyone building AI-driven apps needs scalable cloud infrastructure, and that's Divio's core competence as I read it. The risk is more competition than tech development. Microsoft, AWS, Google and IBM dominate the PaaS market for AI workloads!!! But yes, good spot, I shouldn't give investment advice though - so whether it's a good or bad investment, I'll stay far away from advising on that 😅😁10.3.10.3.I'm getting a review of the platform also, from a childhood friend who is a high level developer. I'll post when he's done some testing.·10.3.I look forward to reading it. Always good with new input from credible sources who actually know what they're talking about. (I have a pretty good grasp of accounts and numbers, but know nothing about AI, saas, PaaS etc.) but I have been confirmed by the partnerships they have made so far.
- ·3.3.In 1 month, a gain of 2000usd has been delivered. Conservatively estimated, they will therefore grow with this new strategy alone by 24000usd per year. This is going to be good!·4.3.I need to just adjust my very quick assumptions on the agency growth. My assumption is that they increase around 2000usd every month. If this increase continues throughout all of 2026, it will mean an additional growth of 150.000usd. Corresponding to an MRR growth (and not ARR as mentioned further up) at the end of the year of a total of 24.000usd. I certainly don't think that's unlikely.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 406 | - | - | ||
| 26 787 | - | - | ||
| 11 737 | - | - | ||
| 1 524 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 40 454 | 40 454 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 40 454 | 40 454 | 0 | 0 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
7 päivää sitten
‧56 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 12.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 13.2.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 1 t sitten · Muokattu1 t sitten · MuokattuSo, I had a friend test the platform. He had some good things to say: It's modern, intuitive, comfortable and very easy to use. (He was using it straight away, and didn't need to read up, look for guides, or experiment to understand the functions.) It saved him lots of time making some simple applications for his hobby-projects. My friend thinks the Divio-platform easily measures up to Heroku, "back when Heroku was good" (his words, not mine.) Asked if he would use it for his own applications, his answer was "probably not". Mainly because the $25 p/month entry-level subscription is pricey compared to alternatives he can use, when his hobby projects are not intended to ever generate revenue. Asked if he would have reccommended it for use for companies where he has worked, his answer was "no", citing a specific security-concern that he encountered as reason. I relayed that issue to management two days ago. Haven't heard back from them, but we'll see if they deem it relevant. So all in all, a bit of a mixed bag for our review.
- 12.3. · Muokattu12.3. · MuokattuJust reviewed the quarterly, after work. Not enthused by the writedown or the shareprice-response, but I believe in the current strategy and the adjustments that have been made to adapt to our current market circumstances. Adaptations to that market were a bit too slow, but I understand why: You have lots of sunk costs- time, money, effort and intentions- connected to the AWS pipeline, and you wouldn't want it to go to waste. So you stuck to it while the world changed rapidly, and unpredictably. The company, with limited resources- and while onboarding Roche- were only sligthly slow to adjust to these swiftly changing realities, and now stands to gain from the adjustments they've made. Also, the "accelerated partner"-status with AWS- achieved through the former strategy- is still there, and will likely yield better at a later point, when U.S. policy regains some reliability/sanity- if "adults in the room" (U.S. congress) face up to what their actual responsibilities are- something they will likely have to do shortly, since a new war was initiated without national/international legal merit, without congressional support, and since the U.S. constitution demands that congress evaluate and judge predicaments like this within 60 days. (There's very little public support for what is happening, and each member of congress has to choose: Stand with the delusional moron who made the abysmal decision, or face the consequences, and public backlash, come midterm elections in November.) Also blowing my horn a bit with the following, but as the current market discussion and my history of posting/predicting these issues might indicate: I've been on to something relevant with most of my posts here. I think I'm still on to something now, and I'm not going to be shy or modest about it: I know buyers are needed to provide liquidity/support the share price, but I also think buying these levles will be profitable. Divio have faced the abyss on multiple fronts- and one after the other- since their IPO: Deterioration of the financial markets and their acess to capital (as an immature growth-company), and then the consecutive deterioration of their actual market- the transatlantic cloud market- after. Yet they have pulled through and still achieved an EPS of -0.01 SEK, and a positive EBIT for 2025. Growth has occurred- and is occurring. Transparency has increased, at least partially, and the company's strategy makes sense for what is happening politically (U.S. tensions) and technologically (Vibe coding etc.) The past is all at a loss for any/all shareholders of Divio, but I still think we'll be gainers from where we are now. I had- and still have- reservations about the C-suite and board + their communication to investors, but I will still be a buyer of the stock, with the uncertainties that likely follow from the Q4 2025 report. I hope you will be too, to make the journey somewhat smoother price-wise. (It's just us: Market makers and retail investors trading in the stock- until a larger mcap and an eventual uplisting might be achieved.) I'll also be speaking to my friend, who is reviewing the platform's functionality, this weekend, and will provide you with an update from that conversation soon. Todeloo!13.3.13.3.Sorry for being sloppy on the details in this post. *Meant EBITDA positive, not EBIT, and EPS is -0.02, not - 0.01, which I wrote.
- ·10.3.I asked a SaaS owner what he thought about Divio technology, as I was concerned if it was truly cutting-edge. Here's what he answered, and it confirms to me once again that AI does not threaten Divio but rather helps them. Answer: Regarding Divio, I don't know the company that well, but technologically it makes sense. Divio is like sitting on the infrastructure layer beneath web apps, and that means the AI wave actually creates more demand for exactly that. Everyone building AI-driven apps needs scalable cloud infrastructure, and that's Divio's core competence as I read it. The risk is more competition than tech development. Microsoft, AWS, Google and IBM dominate the PaaS market for AI workloads!!! But yes, good spot, I shouldn't give investment advice though - so whether it's a good or bad investment, I'll stay far away from advising on that 😅😁10.3.10.3.I'm getting a review of the platform also, from a childhood friend who is a high level developer. I'll post when he's done some testing.·10.3.I look forward to reading it. Always good with new input from credible sources who actually know what they're talking about. (I have a pretty good grasp of accounts and numbers, but know nothing about AI, saas, PaaS etc.) but I have been confirmed by the partnerships they have made so far.
- ·3.3.In 1 month, a gain of 2000usd has been delivered. Conservatively estimated, they will therefore grow with this new strategy alone by 24000usd per year. This is going to be good!·4.3.I need to just adjust my very quick assumptions on the agency growth. My assumption is that they increase around 2000usd every month. If this increase continues throughout all of 2026, it will mean an additional growth of 150.000usd. Corresponding to an MRR growth (and not ARR as mentioned further up) at the end of the year of a total of 24.000usd. I certainly don't think that's unlikely.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Sweden
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 406 | - | - | ||
| 26 787 | - | - | ||
| 11 737 | - | - | ||
| 1 524 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Ostaneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 40 454 | 40 454 | 0 | 0 |
Myyneet eniten
| Välittäjä | Ostettu | Myyty | Netto | Sisäinen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anonyymi | 40 454 | 40 454 | 0 | 0 |