Q2-osavuosiraportti
54 päivää sitten‧32 min
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Stockholm
Määrä
Osto
364 983
Myynti
Määrä
391 673
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 098 | - | - | ||
| 896 | - | - | ||
| 918 | - | - | ||
| 3 268 | - | - | ||
| 896 | - | - |
Ylin
5,365VWAP
Alin
5,18VaihtoMäärä
9,8 1 865 955
VWAP
Ylin
5,365Alin
5,18VaihtoMäärä
9,8 1 865 955
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 23.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 22.7. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 14.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 6.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 5.2. | |
| 2024 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 23.10.2024 |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
2 päivää sitten · Muokattu2 päivää sitten · MuokattuI found this a few days ago. It's 3 months old now, but still interesting. It's the first recent, real interview I've seen with the new CEO. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=chKmwldOOuw&pp=ygURc3RpbGxmcm9udCBhbGV4aXM%3D
3.9. · Muokattu·Stillfront is seriously undervalued no matter what measure you look at. As a small calculation example, compare it with Paradox. They only bring in about 2 billion in turnover while Stillfront brings in 6 billion, that is 3 times more. Sure, Stillfront needs to slim down a bit and get in better shape, but they have so much to take off. Let's say they sell off a few businesses, the worst ones, and then get a turnover of 4 billion but with significantly better margins. Then they still have double the turnover compared to Paradox. And why shouldn't Stillfront be able to have similar margins as Paradox once they get in shape? As I said, they are in the same industry. If we now look at the valuation, Paradox is worth almost 19 billion while Stillfront is worth almost 3 billion. Stillfront should be worth at least what Paradox is worth, but probably double that once they get in shape. In that case, that would mean a market cap of 38 billion. Then we are talking about a market cap of at least x10, i.e. a price that is ten times what it is today. Now maybe not all my numbers are right, or something that I didn't think of or know about, but you get my point. This is a huge turnaround company that has a very good chance of succeeding in the future. Then it is also the case that the mobile gaming market is growing faster than the PC and console gaming market. The more developing countries that get better internet infrastructure, broadband, smartphones, etc. The more new players Stillfront will get. Especially since they have very solid titles in their portfolio. Personally, I think this company will be a very large company that will be on the large cap list in 10 years, but probably much sooner than that. A definite buy!
9.9.·This scam company was on the A list for a while so you could buy their shares for your pension savings too. Then of course they left the A list. They are just good at guessing wrong, buying expensively and making excuses. Of course the valuation is low, that's how it is when the talk doesn't get to the results.- 3.9.·A total transformation in less than two years We visited Stillfront yesterday and met with CEO Alexis Bonte, acting CFO Tim Holland and IR head Patrik Johannesson. The discussions focused on the strategic review. We left the meeting with the feeling that the company will look completely different, likely in less than two years, with higher margins, fewer but bigger games and a stronger balance sheet. The company is exploring closures and divestments, and all options are on the table. From an industry perspective, there are buyers for most assets, and there is ample financing. There are now two groups that own more than 10 percent of the shares, one based on the sellers of Goodgame and one on Jawaker. This is positive, as the board only owns 0.1 percent of the shares, and for most buyers interested in parts of the business, the current valuation suggests that it is more advantageous to buy the whole company. Our target price is based on a valuation where the value of the different parts is summed up. The company generates 1 billion SEK in cash flow per year (net!) but only has a market capitalization of 2.4 billion SEK and 5 billion SEK in total net debt (including additional purchase prices). The loans were recently renewed and are trading with a low spread. We reiterate our Buy recommendation and target price of 12 SEK.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q2-osavuosiraportti
54 päivää sitten‧32 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 2 päivää sitten · Muokattu2 päivää sitten · MuokattuI found this a few days ago. It's 3 months old now, but still interesting. It's the first recent, real interview I've seen with the new CEO. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=chKmwldOOuw&pp=ygURc3RpbGxmcm9udCBhbGV4aXM%3D
- 3.9. · Muokattu·Stillfront is seriously undervalued no matter what measure you look at. As a small calculation example, compare it with Paradox. They only bring in about 2 billion in turnover while Stillfront brings in 6 billion, that is 3 times more. Sure, Stillfront needs to slim down a bit and get in better shape, but they have so much to take off. Let's say they sell off a few businesses, the worst ones, and then get a turnover of 4 billion but with significantly better margins. Then they still have double the turnover compared to Paradox. And why shouldn't Stillfront be able to have similar margins as Paradox once they get in shape? As I said, they are in the same industry. If we now look at the valuation, Paradox is worth almost 19 billion while Stillfront is worth almost 3 billion. Stillfront should be worth at least what Paradox is worth, but probably double that once they get in shape. In that case, that would mean a market cap of 38 billion. Then we are talking about a market cap of at least x10, i.e. a price that is ten times what it is today. Now maybe not all my numbers are right, or something that I didn't think of or know about, but you get my point. This is a huge turnaround company that has a very good chance of succeeding in the future. Then it is also the case that the mobile gaming market is growing faster than the PC and console gaming market. The more developing countries that get better internet infrastructure, broadband, smartphones, etc. The more new players Stillfront will get. Especially since they have very solid titles in their portfolio. Personally, I think this company will be a very large company that will be on the large cap list in 10 years, but probably much sooner than that. A definite buy!9.9.·This scam company was on the A list for a while so you could buy their shares for your pension savings too. Then of course they left the A list. They are just good at guessing wrong, buying expensively and making excuses. Of course the valuation is low, that's how it is when the talk doesn't get to the results.
- 3.9.·A total transformation in less than two years We visited Stillfront yesterday and met with CEO Alexis Bonte, acting CFO Tim Holland and IR head Patrik Johannesson. The discussions focused on the strategic review. We left the meeting with the feeling that the company will look completely different, likely in less than two years, with higher margins, fewer but bigger games and a stronger balance sheet. The company is exploring closures and divestments, and all options are on the table. From an industry perspective, there are buyers for most assets, and there is ample financing. There are now two groups that own more than 10 percent of the shares, one based on the sellers of Goodgame and one on Jawaker. This is positive, as the board only owns 0.1 percent of the shares, and for most buyers interested in parts of the business, the current valuation suggests that it is more advantageous to buy the whole company. Our target price is based on a valuation where the value of the different parts is summed up. The company generates 1 billion SEK in cash flow per year (net!) but only has a market capitalization of 2.4 billion SEK and 5 billion SEK in total net debt (including additional purchase prices). The loans were recently renewed and are trading with a low spread. We reiterate our Buy recommendation and target price of 12 SEK.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Stockholm
Määrä
Osto
364 983
Myynti
Määrä
391 673
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 098 | - | - | ||
| 896 | - | - | ||
| 918 | - | - | ||
| 3 268 | - | - | ||
| 896 | - | - |
Ylin
5,365VWAP
Alin
5,18VaihtoMäärä
9,8 1 865 955
VWAP
Ylin
5,365Alin
5,18VaihtoMäärä
9,8 1 865 955
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 23.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 22.7. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 14.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 6.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 5.2. | |
| 2024 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 23.10.2024 |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Q2-osavuosiraportti
54 päivää sitten‧32 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 23.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 22.7. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 14.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 6.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 5.2. | |
| 2024 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 23.10.2024 |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 2 päivää sitten · Muokattu2 päivää sitten · MuokattuI found this a few days ago. It's 3 months old now, but still interesting. It's the first recent, real interview I've seen with the new CEO. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=chKmwldOOuw&pp=ygURc3RpbGxmcm9udCBhbGV4aXM%3D
- 3.9. · Muokattu·Stillfront is seriously undervalued no matter what measure you look at. As a small calculation example, compare it with Paradox. They only bring in about 2 billion in turnover while Stillfront brings in 6 billion, that is 3 times more. Sure, Stillfront needs to slim down a bit and get in better shape, but they have so much to take off. Let's say they sell off a few businesses, the worst ones, and then get a turnover of 4 billion but with significantly better margins. Then they still have double the turnover compared to Paradox. And why shouldn't Stillfront be able to have similar margins as Paradox once they get in shape? As I said, they are in the same industry. If we now look at the valuation, Paradox is worth almost 19 billion while Stillfront is worth almost 3 billion. Stillfront should be worth at least what Paradox is worth, but probably double that once they get in shape. In that case, that would mean a market cap of 38 billion. Then we are talking about a market cap of at least x10, i.e. a price that is ten times what it is today. Now maybe not all my numbers are right, or something that I didn't think of or know about, but you get my point. This is a huge turnaround company that has a very good chance of succeeding in the future. Then it is also the case that the mobile gaming market is growing faster than the PC and console gaming market. The more developing countries that get better internet infrastructure, broadband, smartphones, etc. The more new players Stillfront will get. Especially since they have very solid titles in their portfolio. Personally, I think this company will be a very large company that will be on the large cap list in 10 years, but probably much sooner than that. A definite buy!9.9.·This scam company was on the A list for a while so you could buy their shares for your pension savings too. Then of course they left the A list. They are just good at guessing wrong, buying expensively and making excuses. Of course the valuation is low, that's how it is when the talk doesn't get to the results.
- 3.9.·A total transformation in less than two years We visited Stillfront yesterday and met with CEO Alexis Bonte, acting CFO Tim Holland and IR head Patrik Johannesson. The discussions focused on the strategic review. We left the meeting with the feeling that the company will look completely different, likely in less than two years, with higher margins, fewer but bigger games and a stronger balance sheet. The company is exploring closures and divestments, and all options are on the table. From an industry perspective, there are buyers for most assets, and there is ample financing. There are now two groups that own more than 10 percent of the shares, one based on the sellers of Goodgame and one on Jawaker. This is positive, as the board only owns 0.1 percent of the shares, and for most buyers interested in parts of the business, the current valuation suggests that it is more advantageous to buy the whole company. Our target price is based on a valuation where the value of the different parts is summed up. The company generates 1 billion SEK in cash flow per year (net!) but only has a market capitalization of 2.4 billion SEK and 5 billion SEK in total net debt (including additional purchase prices). The loans were recently renewed and are trading with a low spread. We reiterate our Buy recommendation and target price of 12 SEK.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Stockholm
Määrä
Osto
364 983
Myynti
Määrä
391 673
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 098 | - | - | ||
| 896 | - | - | ||
| 918 | - | - | ||
| 3 268 | - | - | ||
| 896 | - | - |
Ylin
5,365VWAP
Alin
5,18VaihtoMäärä
9,8 1 865 955
VWAP
Ylin
5,365Alin
5,18VaihtoMäärä
9,8 1 865 955
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt