2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
81 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
1 000
Myynti
Määrä
21 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 2 003 | - | - | ||
| 15 238 | - | - | ||
| 2 491 | - | - | ||
| 1 652 | - | - |
Ylin
2,035VWAP
Alin
1,96VaihtoMäärä
0,8 422 363
VWAP
Ylin
2,035Alin
1,96VaihtoMäärä
0,8 422 363
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 12.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 8.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 14.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 12.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenEurope wants to secure Canadian gas!!!!!!! Is this news true? The EU seeks gas from Canada – does geopolitics meet realism in the energy sector? Yes, this news is accurate and up-to-date. In fact, significant diplomatic activity in January 2026 confirmed this trend, as European ambitions transformed from mere "discussions" into an urgent "geopolitical necessity". Here are the details of the new energy reality: 1. An American "wake-up call" In late January 2026, EU Energy Commissioner Dan Jørgensen described the excessive reliance on American liquefied natural gas (LNG), which accounts for more than 50 % of Europe's imports, as a growing concern. This concern was amplified by statements from the American administration (under the new Donald Trump administration) which raised Brussels' fears about the reliability of supplies and the use of energy as a tool for political pressure. 2. Canada as a "realistic" alternative Europe pursued a strategy of "geopolitical realism" by initiating formal talks with Canada to become a major supplier. The rationale is: Political compatibility: Canada is considered a "democratic and reliable" partner, unlike other unreliable suppliers. Infrastructure: Canada has already begun operating its long-awaited liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals (such as the Canada LNG project), making them technically capable of exporting directly to Europe. Canada's desire for diversification: In January 2026, Canadian Energy Minister Tim Hodgson stated that Canada sought to reduce its reliance on the American market (which consumed 98 % of its exports) and shift its focus to global markets. 3. Broader diversification (Qatar and North Africa): In addition to Canada, the EU seeks to strengthen its agreements with Qatar and North African countries (such as Algeria and Egypt) to create a diversified supply basket that prevents a single country from dominating European energy security. Summary of the current situation (2026): Influencing factors: The impact of EU decisions; tensions with Washington; efforts to reduce reliance on American gas; the Russian gas embargo; the commitment to completely eliminate Russian gas by 2027 necessitates finding immediate alternatives; geopolitical realism; the alliance with Canada to ensure stable supplies free from political blackmail. More information on specific Canadian gas projects expected to serve the European market? Yes, this news is accurate and reflects a significant strategic shift in European energy policy for 2026. It is no longer just about finding suppliers; it has become a matter of "geopolitical realism" aimed at reducing over-reliance on American gas (which has reached record levels) and avoiding future political pressure. Here are the main points supporting this approach based on the latest developments: 1. Finding a "reliable partner" (Canada) 2. Overcoming technical obstacles: Canada has already begun exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminals along the Pacific coast (under the name "Canadian LNG"), and there is European pressure to accelerate the connection along the East Coast to facilitate direct shipping to Europe. 3. Geopolitical compatibility: The EU views Canada as a "stable and democratic" partner capable of securing energy flows isolated from fluctuations in international politics that could affect supplies from other regions. 4.2. Motivations for European action in 2026 1. Reducing reliance on the USA: Following statements from European officials in January 2026, concerns arose regarding Europe's dependence on American gas, which exceeded 50 %, prompting Brussels to pursue "true diversification" that includes Canada, Qatar, and North African countries. 2. Reaction to Russian threats: Russian warnings of supply cuts or the use of energy as leverage (as reflected in recent statements from the Kremlin in January 2026) made it a security imperative to secure long-term alternatives from Canada. 3. The "Energy Realism" strategy: This term refers to Europe's move away from reliance on the spot market and a return to long-term contracts with allied countries like Canada to ensure price stability and the flow of necessary quantities over the next decade. Conclusion: This is a highly accurate assessment, representing a shift from "total dependence on the USA" to "risk diversification" through a strategic partnership with Canada, which international reports currently describe as a convergence of geopolitics and economic realism.
·1 päivä sitten · Muokattu1015: Strange, there is no one on the shareholder lists that matches your claim of almost 5 million shares. I myself have a 7-digit number of shares, (not 5 million, but...) and a 7-digit number of preference shares. Unfortunately, currently also with a 7-digit amount in loss. Have been involved for almost 20 years with ups and downs. I am now holding completely steady going forward and saving these for my pension.·1 päivä sittenASK is only within the EEA, QEC is Canadian.
·1 päivä sittenYou are right regarding ASK. For IPS and different types of capital insurance (Zero, Investeringskonto, ...) the same applies.
·2 päivää sittenTaken from FA forum EU seeks gas from Canada – geopolitics meets energy realism The EU is now considering increased imports of natural gas from Canada and Qatar to reduce its growing dependence on American LNG. This is evident from a recent article from Bloomberg (28. January 2026): https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-28/eu-eyes-gas-from-qatar-and-canada-to-reduce-reliance-on-us-lng The background is clearly geopolitical. Following the loss of Russian gas and a significant scaling up of LNG imports from the USA, the EU has in practice exchanged one strategic dependency for another. American LNG now accounts for over half of the EU's LNG imports, which in Brussels is perceived as a vulnerability – especially in light of increased political unpredictability in the USA. In this context, Canada appears as an attractive alternative supplier: politically stable, resource-rich, and without the same geopolitical baggage as the Middle East or Russia. At the same time, Canada itself has signaled a desire to reduce its almost total energy export dependence on the American market. This is happening in parallel with the Carney government in Ottawa having highlighted energy security, economic robustness, and strategic independence as central political goals. The recently held Cabinet Planning Forum in Québec City, focusing on economy, affordability, and security, fits directly into this picture. The contrast to Quebec's own policy is striking. As EnergyNow recently pointed out, Quebec has significant gas resources – especially in the St. Lawrence Lowlands – but has nevertheless chosen a political total ban on exploration and production. The result is that the province imports nearly 100 % of its natural gas consumption, largely from the USA: https://energynow.ca/2026/01/natural-gas-development-potential-in-quebec-resources-challenges-and-current-supply-dynamics/ As the EU now actively demands non-American gas, and Canada wishes to diversify its export markets, this inconsistency becomes increasingly difficult to ignore. The question is no longer whether gas is needed, but where it will come from – and on what political terms. The development underscores that energy policy is increasingly security and trade policy. For Canada – and for provinces like Quebec – the pressure for more pragmatic solutions thus increases, whether in the form of production, export infrastructure, or economic settlements with existing actors.- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuBased on Questerre Energy Corporation's recent restructuring (approved January 15, 2026), these shares will appear in your account as follows: 1. Will they be "separate" or included with the rest of your shares? The answer is both. You will see them in the same investment account, but with a separate trading symbol (new symbol/new line). New common shares: These will continue to trade with the same trading symbol and ISIN/CUSIP number. Preferred shares (Class 2): These will appear as a completely new item in your account, with their own ISIN number (CA74836K3082). 2. Trading method (important point) Although you can buy and sell common shares as usual, preferred shares are not currently listed on the stock exchange (they are illiquid). This means: You will see them in your account as a quantity (e.g., one preferred share for each common share you own). The market value may appear as "zero" or a very low estimated value (around CAD 0.01) because it is not yet listed on the stock exchange. The company is currently exploring opportunities for a future stock exchange listing (IPO) so that the shares can be traded.
·1 päivä sittenI see these at Nordnet, both on AF and IKZ accounts: QUESTERRE ENERGY CORPORATION PREFERRED
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
81 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenEurope wants to secure Canadian gas!!!!!!! Is this news true? The EU seeks gas from Canada – does geopolitics meet realism in the energy sector? Yes, this news is accurate and up-to-date. In fact, significant diplomatic activity in January 2026 confirmed this trend, as European ambitions transformed from mere "discussions" into an urgent "geopolitical necessity". Here are the details of the new energy reality: 1. An American "wake-up call" In late January 2026, EU Energy Commissioner Dan Jørgensen described the excessive reliance on American liquefied natural gas (LNG), which accounts for more than 50 % of Europe's imports, as a growing concern. This concern was amplified by statements from the American administration (under the new Donald Trump administration) which raised Brussels' fears about the reliability of supplies and the use of energy as a tool for political pressure. 2. Canada as a "realistic" alternative Europe pursued a strategy of "geopolitical realism" by initiating formal talks with Canada to become a major supplier. The rationale is: Political compatibility: Canada is considered a "democratic and reliable" partner, unlike other unreliable suppliers. Infrastructure: Canada has already begun operating its long-awaited liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals (such as the Canada LNG project), making them technically capable of exporting directly to Europe. Canada's desire for diversification: In January 2026, Canadian Energy Minister Tim Hodgson stated that Canada sought to reduce its reliance on the American market (which consumed 98 % of its exports) and shift its focus to global markets. 3. Broader diversification (Qatar and North Africa): In addition to Canada, the EU seeks to strengthen its agreements with Qatar and North African countries (such as Algeria and Egypt) to create a diversified supply basket that prevents a single country from dominating European energy security. Summary of the current situation (2026): Influencing factors: The impact of EU decisions; tensions with Washington; efforts to reduce reliance on American gas; the Russian gas embargo; the commitment to completely eliminate Russian gas by 2027 necessitates finding immediate alternatives; geopolitical realism; the alliance with Canada to ensure stable supplies free from political blackmail. More information on specific Canadian gas projects expected to serve the European market? Yes, this news is accurate and reflects a significant strategic shift in European energy policy for 2026. It is no longer just about finding suppliers; it has become a matter of "geopolitical realism" aimed at reducing over-reliance on American gas (which has reached record levels) and avoiding future political pressure. Here are the main points supporting this approach based on the latest developments: 1. Finding a "reliable partner" (Canada) 2. Overcoming technical obstacles: Canada has already begun exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminals along the Pacific coast (under the name "Canadian LNG"), and there is European pressure to accelerate the connection along the East Coast to facilitate direct shipping to Europe. 3. Geopolitical compatibility: The EU views Canada as a "stable and democratic" partner capable of securing energy flows isolated from fluctuations in international politics that could affect supplies from other regions. 4.2. Motivations for European action in 2026 1. Reducing reliance on the USA: Following statements from European officials in January 2026, concerns arose regarding Europe's dependence on American gas, which exceeded 50 %, prompting Brussels to pursue "true diversification" that includes Canada, Qatar, and North African countries. 2. Reaction to Russian threats: Russian warnings of supply cuts or the use of energy as leverage (as reflected in recent statements from the Kremlin in January 2026) made it a security imperative to secure long-term alternatives from Canada. 3. The "Energy Realism" strategy: This term refers to Europe's move away from reliance on the spot market and a return to long-term contracts with allied countries like Canada to ensure price stability and the flow of necessary quantities over the next decade. Conclusion: This is a highly accurate assessment, representing a shift from "total dependence on the USA" to "risk diversification" through a strategic partnership with Canada, which international reports currently describe as a convergence of geopolitics and economic realism.
- ·1 päivä sitten · Muokattu1015: Strange, there is no one on the shareholder lists that matches your claim of almost 5 million shares. I myself have a 7-digit number of shares, (not 5 million, but...) and a 7-digit number of preference shares. Unfortunately, currently also with a 7-digit amount in loss. Have been involved for almost 20 years with ups and downs. I am now holding completely steady going forward and saving these for my pension.·1 päivä sittenASK is only within the EEA, QEC is Canadian.·1 päivä sittenYou are right regarding ASK. For IPS and different types of capital insurance (Zero, Investeringskonto, ...) the same applies.
- ·2 päivää sittenTaken from FA forum EU seeks gas from Canada – geopolitics meets energy realism The EU is now considering increased imports of natural gas from Canada and Qatar to reduce its growing dependence on American LNG. This is evident from a recent article from Bloomberg (28. January 2026): https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-28/eu-eyes-gas-from-qatar-and-canada-to-reduce-reliance-on-us-lng The background is clearly geopolitical. Following the loss of Russian gas and a significant scaling up of LNG imports from the USA, the EU has in practice exchanged one strategic dependency for another. American LNG now accounts for over half of the EU's LNG imports, which in Brussels is perceived as a vulnerability – especially in light of increased political unpredictability in the USA. In this context, Canada appears as an attractive alternative supplier: politically stable, resource-rich, and without the same geopolitical baggage as the Middle East or Russia. At the same time, Canada itself has signaled a desire to reduce its almost total energy export dependence on the American market. This is happening in parallel with the Carney government in Ottawa having highlighted energy security, economic robustness, and strategic independence as central political goals. The recently held Cabinet Planning Forum in Québec City, focusing on economy, affordability, and security, fits directly into this picture. The contrast to Quebec's own policy is striking. As EnergyNow recently pointed out, Quebec has significant gas resources – especially in the St. Lawrence Lowlands – but has nevertheless chosen a political total ban on exploration and production. The result is that the province imports nearly 100 % of its natural gas consumption, largely from the USA: https://energynow.ca/2026/01/natural-gas-development-potential-in-quebec-resources-challenges-and-current-supply-dynamics/ As the EU now actively demands non-American gas, and Canada wishes to diversify its export markets, this inconsistency becomes increasingly difficult to ignore. The question is no longer whether gas is needed, but where it will come from – and on what political terms. The development underscores that energy policy is increasingly security and trade policy. For Canada – and for provinces like Quebec – the pressure for more pragmatic solutions thus increases, whether in the form of production, export infrastructure, or economic settlements with existing actors.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuBased on Questerre Energy Corporation's recent restructuring (approved January 15, 2026), these shares will appear in your account as follows: 1. Will they be "separate" or included with the rest of your shares? The answer is both. You will see them in the same investment account, but with a separate trading symbol (new symbol/new line). New common shares: These will continue to trade with the same trading symbol and ISIN/CUSIP number. Preferred shares (Class 2): These will appear as a completely new item in your account, with their own ISIN number (CA74836K3082). 2. Trading method (important point) Although you can buy and sell common shares as usual, preferred shares are not currently listed on the stock exchange (they are illiquid). This means: You will see them in your account as a quantity (e.g., one preferred share for each common share you own). The market value may appear as "zero" or a very low estimated value (around CAD 0.01) because it is not yet listed on the stock exchange. The company is currently exploring opportunities for a future stock exchange listing (IPO) so that the shares can be traded.·1 päivä sittenI see these at Nordnet, both on AF and IKZ accounts: QUESTERRE ENERGY CORPORATION PREFERRED
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
1 000
Myynti
Määrä
21 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 2 003 | - | - | ||
| 15 238 | - | - | ||
| 2 491 | - | - | ||
| 1 652 | - | - |
Ylin
2,035VWAP
Alin
1,96VaihtoMäärä
0,8 422 363
VWAP
Ylin
2,035Alin
1,96VaihtoMäärä
0,8 422 363
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 12.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 8.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 14.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 12.11.2024 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
81 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 12.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 8.8.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 14.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.3.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 12.11.2024 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenEurope wants to secure Canadian gas!!!!!!! Is this news true? The EU seeks gas from Canada – does geopolitics meet realism in the energy sector? Yes, this news is accurate and up-to-date. In fact, significant diplomatic activity in January 2026 confirmed this trend, as European ambitions transformed from mere "discussions" into an urgent "geopolitical necessity". Here are the details of the new energy reality: 1. An American "wake-up call" In late January 2026, EU Energy Commissioner Dan Jørgensen described the excessive reliance on American liquefied natural gas (LNG), which accounts for more than 50 % of Europe's imports, as a growing concern. This concern was amplified by statements from the American administration (under the new Donald Trump administration) which raised Brussels' fears about the reliability of supplies and the use of energy as a tool for political pressure. 2. Canada as a "realistic" alternative Europe pursued a strategy of "geopolitical realism" by initiating formal talks with Canada to become a major supplier. The rationale is: Political compatibility: Canada is considered a "democratic and reliable" partner, unlike other unreliable suppliers. Infrastructure: Canada has already begun operating its long-awaited liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals (such as the Canada LNG project), making them technically capable of exporting directly to Europe. Canada's desire for diversification: In January 2026, Canadian Energy Minister Tim Hodgson stated that Canada sought to reduce its reliance on the American market (which consumed 98 % of its exports) and shift its focus to global markets. 3. Broader diversification (Qatar and North Africa): In addition to Canada, the EU seeks to strengthen its agreements with Qatar and North African countries (such as Algeria and Egypt) to create a diversified supply basket that prevents a single country from dominating European energy security. Summary of the current situation (2026): Influencing factors: The impact of EU decisions; tensions with Washington; efforts to reduce reliance on American gas; the Russian gas embargo; the commitment to completely eliminate Russian gas by 2027 necessitates finding immediate alternatives; geopolitical realism; the alliance with Canada to ensure stable supplies free from political blackmail. More information on specific Canadian gas projects expected to serve the European market? Yes, this news is accurate and reflects a significant strategic shift in European energy policy for 2026. It is no longer just about finding suppliers; it has become a matter of "geopolitical realism" aimed at reducing over-reliance on American gas (which has reached record levels) and avoiding future political pressure. Here are the main points supporting this approach based on the latest developments: 1. Finding a "reliable partner" (Canada) 2. Overcoming technical obstacles: Canada has already begun exporting liquefied natural gas (LNG) from its terminals along the Pacific coast (under the name "Canadian LNG"), and there is European pressure to accelerate the connection along the East Coast to facilitate direct shipping to Europe. 3. Geopolitical compatibility: The EU views Canada as a "stable and democratic" partner capable of securing energy flows isolated from fluctuations in international politics that could affect supplies from other regions. 4.2. Motivations for European action in 2026 1. Reducing reliance on the USA: Following statements from European officials in January 2026, concerns arose regarding Europe's dependence on American gas, which exceeded 50 %, prompting Brussels to pursue "true diversification" that includes Canada, Qatar, and North African countries. 2. Reaction to Russian threats: Russian warnings of supply cuts or the use of energy as leverage (as reflected in recent statements from the Kremlin in January 2026) made it a security imperative to secure long-term alternatives from Canada. 3. The "Energy Realism" strategy: This term refers to Europe's move away from reliance on the spot market and a return to long-term contracts with allied countries like Canada to ensure price stability and the flow of necessary quantities over the next decade. Conclusion: This is a highly accurate assessment, representing a shift from "total dependence on the USA" to "risk diversification" through a strategic partnership with Canada, which international reports currently describe as a convergence of geopolitics and economic realism.
- ·1 päivä sitten · Muokattu1015: Strange, there is no one on the shareholder lists that matches your claim of almost 5 million shares. I myself have a 7-digit number of shares, (not 5 million, but...) and a 7-digit number of preference shares. Unfortunately, currently also with a 7-digit amount in loss. Have been involved for almost 20 years with ups and downs. I am now holding completely steady going forward and saving these for my pension.·1 päivä sittenASK is only within the EEA, QEC is Canadian.·1 päivä sittenYou are right regarding ASK. For IPS and different types of capital insurance (Zero, Investeringskonto, ...) the same applies.
- ·2 päivää sittenTaken from FA forum EU seeks gas from Canada – geopolitics meets energy realism The EU is now considering increased imports of natural gas from Canada and Qatar to reduce its growing dependence on American LNG. This is evident from a recent article from Bloomberg (28. January 2026): https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-28/eu-eyes-gas-from-qatar-and-canada-to-reduce-reliance-on-us-lng The background is clearly geopolitical. Following the loss of Russian gas and a significant scaling up of LNG imports from the USA, the EU has in practice exchanged one strategic dependency for another. American LNG now accounts for over half of the EU's LNG imports, which in Brussels is perceived as a vulnerability – especially in light of increased political unpredictability in the USA. In this context, Canada appears as an attractive alternative supplier: politically stable, resource-rich, and without the same geopolitical baggage as the Middle East or Russia. At the same time, Canada itself has signaled a desire to reduce its almost total energy export dependence on the American market. This is happening in parallel with the Carney government in Ottawa having highlighted energy security, economic robustness, and strategic independence as central political goals. The recently held Cabinet Planning Forum in Québec City, focusing on economy, affordability, and security, fits directly into this picture. The contrast to Quebec's own policy is striking. As EnergyNow recently pointed out, Quebec has significant gas resources – especially in the St. Lawrence Lowlands – but has nevertheless chosen a political total ban on exploration and production. The result is that the province imports nearly 100 % of its natural gas consumption, largely from the USA: https://energynow.ca/2026/01/natural-gas-development-potential-in-quebec-resources-challenges-and-current-supply-dynamics/ As the EU now actively demands non-American gas, and Canada wishes to diversify its export markets, this inconsistency becomes increasingly difficult to ignore. The question is no longer whether gas is needed, but where it will come from – and on what political terms. The development underscores that energy policy is increasingly security and trade policy. For Canada – and for provinces like Quebec – the pressure for more pragmatic solutions thus increases, whether in the form of production, export infrastructure, or economic settlements with existing actors.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuBased on Questerre Energy Corporation's recent restructuring (approved January 15, 2026), these shares will appear in your account as follows: 1. Will they be "separate" or included with the rest of your shares? The answer is both. You will see them in the same investment account, but with a separate trading symbol (new symbol/new line). New common shares: These will continue to trade with the same trading symbol and ISIN/CUSIP number. Preferred shares (Class 2): These will appear as a completely new item in your account, with their own ISIN number (CA74836K3082). 2. Trading method (important point) Although you can buy and sell common shares as usual, preferred shares are not currently listed on the stock exchange (they are illiquid). This means: You will see them in your account as a quantity (e.g., one preferred share for each common share you own). The market value may appear as "zero" or a very low estimated value (around CAD 0.01) because it is not yet listed on the stock exchange. The company is currently exploring opportunities for a future stock exchange listing (IPO) so that the shares can be traded.·1 päivä sittenI see these at Nordnet, both on AF and IKZ accounts: QUESTERRE ENERGY CORPORATION PREFERRED
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
1 000
Myynti
Määrä
21 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 2 003 | - | - | ||
| 15 238 | - | - | ||
| 2 491 | - | - | ||
| 1 652 | - | - |
Ylin
2,035VWAP
Alin
1,96VaihtoMäärä
0,8 422 363
VWAP
Ylin
2,035Alin
1,96VaihtoMäärä
0,8 422 363
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt