2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
56 päivää sitten
‧55 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 169 | - | - | ||
| 1 831 | - | - | ||
| 4 810 | - | - | ||
| 167 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 12.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 12.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 14.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 7.8.2025 |
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·9 t sittenQEC value. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand what a solid foundation we are on now. And then I haven't included Utica. Questerre's Kakwa North Valuation Overview Questerre's retained 50% working interest in Kakwa North has an estimated implied asset value exceeding $139 million to $162 million, inferred directly from the recent Kakwa Central divestment metrics. This calculation is based on the sale of Kakwa Central. Then we have Saskatchewan: 100% working interest in 14,730 acres in Antler, Southeast Saskatchewan. International & Technology Assets United States: Oil shale leases and projects in the Uintah Basin, Utah, and Wyoming via equity investments in Red Leaf Resources. Brazil: Oil shale mining and resource interests located in São Mateus do Sul, Paraná. Jordan: Prospec-tier shale oil and energy assets in the Kingdom of Jordan. Clean Tech: Proprietary extraction methods like EcoShale and HCCO® technology testing. And now also Nova Scotia
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuThere has come a new independent survey of potential values in utica: United States Geological Survey published on September 30, 2026 a new geological assessment of Utica in eastern Canada. USGS estimates on average around 9 trillion cubic feet technically recoverable, hitherto undiscovered shale gas. It is thus a fresh, independent American governmental assessment confirming that the resource base is significant. USGS should there be extraction, the share values just from utica then: QGAS-37NOK - 600NOK QEC: 3,7NOK - 60NOK
·29.9.Something is afoot and these are good signs - semi-large blocks are being traded on the sly and it is a sign that someone knows something we don't!
Government shenanigans, they have lawyers to handle the case, and are now throwing a report into the mix right in the middle of it all. I hope they get double penalized for this dirty trick
·25.9.Thinking a bit about the mediation taking place and brainstorming about what I wish was on the table. This is solely based on loose thoughts, but as an opponent of bureaucracy and a supporter of pragmatic solutions, I hope they are reading the Nordnet forum. Alternatives: A: QEC/QGAS/owners of other licenses can start producing asap following environmental requirements, but in return there is a low compensation amount. Production for a period going forward. B: More compensation, but more time spent before production. C: No/microscopic test production and compensation after many years in the legal system. D: No production and no compensation, after years in the legal system. Quebec: "Since we need energy, we wonder; should we go for alternative A or alternative B?" How large can compensation in alternative A and B become? Dream post, with a touch of realism in it: Small, shared pot of 10MCAD Larger pot for those who have sold out: 50MCAD Production for 20 years. (These are numbers pulled out of thin air, but hopefully they are the ones they are discussing) Small pot is distributed based on ownership fraction when the restriction was introduced. Those who have sold out share a larger pot. Owners of rights today are pulled out of the fraction and do not get compensation from this pot. Those who own rights today start production asap following environmental requirements. Production applies for 20 years. Tax system for gas income is set up as in Norway. (Unsure about what the tax system is like in Quebec, but like the model with special tax for oil and gas at 71.8%.) Result: Everyone gets a little. Those who have sold out get a little more. Those who own today can produce asap. Quebec is done with the case for 60MCAD, gets large tax revenues in the time ahead and lots of energy. The money Quebec earns they can build solar cells, windmills and dams for, then they are ready for the transition in 20 years. In 20 years Trump is dead and the civil war in the US is over.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
56 päivää sitten
‧55 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·9 t sittenQEC value. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand what a solid foundation we are on now. And then I haven't included Utica. Questerre's Kakwa North Valuation Overview Questerre's retained 50% working interest in Kakwa North has an estimated implied asset value exceeding $139 million to $162 million, inferred directly from the recent Kakwa Central divestment metrics. This calculation is based on the sale of Kakwa Central. Then we have Saskatchewan: 100% working interest in 14,730 acres in Antler, Southeast Saskatchewan. International & Technology Assets United States: Oil shale leases and projects in the Uintah Basin, Utah, and Wyoming via equity investments in Red Leaf Resources. Brazil: Oil shale mining and resource interests located in São Mateus do Sul, Paraná. Jordan: Prospec-tier shale oil and energy assets in the Kingdom of Jordan. Clean Tech: Proprietary extraction methods like EcoShale and HCCO® technology testing. And now also Nova Scotia
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuThere has come a new independent survey of potential values in utica: United States Geological Survey published on September 30, 2026 a new geological assessment of Utica in eastern Canada. USGS estimates on average around 9 trillion cubic feet technically recoverable, hitherto undiscovered shale gas. It is thus a fresh, independent American governmental assessment confirming that the resource base is significant. USGS should there be extraction, the share values just from utica then: QGAS-37NOK - 600NOK QEC: 3,7NOK - 60NOK
- ·29.9.Something is afoot and these are good signs - semi-large blocks are being traded on the sly and it is a sign that someone knows something we don't!Government shenanigans, they have lawyers to handle the case, and are now throwing a report into the mix right in the middle of it all. I hope they get double penalized for this dirty trick
- ·25.9.Thinking a bit about the mediation taking place and brainstorming about what I wish was on the table. This is solely based on loose thoughts, but as an opponent of bureaucracy and a supporter of pragmatic solutions, I hope they are reading the Nordnet forum. Alternatives: A: QEC/QGAS/owners of other licenses can start producing asap following environmental requirements, but in return there is a low compensation amount. Production for a period going forward. B: More compensation, but more time spent before production. C: No/microscopic test production and compensation after many years in the legal system. D: No production and no compensation, after years in the legal system. Quebec: "Since we need energy, we wonder; should we go for alternative A or alternative B?" How large can compensation in alternative A and B become? Dream post, with a touch of realism in it: Small, shared pot of 10MCAD Larger pot for those who have sold out: 50MCAD Production for 20 years. (These are numbers pulled out of thin air, but hopefully they are the ones they are discussing) Small pot is distributed based on ownership fraction when the restriction was introduced. Those who have sold out share a larger pot. Owners of rights today are pulled out of the fraction and do not get compensation from this pot. Those who own rights today start production asap following environmental requirements. Production applies for 20 years. Tax system for gas income is set up as in Norway. (Unsure about what the tax system is like in Quebec, but like the model with special tax for oil and gas at 71.8%.) Result: Everyone gets a little. Those who have sold out get a little more. Those who own today can produce asap. Quebec is done with the case for 60MCAD, gets large tax revenues in the time ahead and lots of energy. The money Quebec earns they can build solar cells, windmills and dams for, then they are ready for the transition in 20 years. In 20 years Trump is dead and the civil war in the US is over.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 169 | - | - | ||
| 1 831 | - | - | ||
| 4 810 | - | - | ||
| 167 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 12.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 12.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 14.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 7.8.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
56 päivää sitten
‧55 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 12.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 12.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 14.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 7.8.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·9 t sittenQEC value. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to understand what a solid foundation we are on now. And then I haven't included Utica. Questerre's Kakwa North Valuation Overview Questerre's retained 50% working interest in Kakwa North has an estimated implied asset value exceeding $139 million to $162 million, inferred directly from the recent Kakwa Central divestment metrics. This calculation is based on the sale of Kakwa Central. Then we have Saskatchewan: 100% working interest in 14,730 acres in Antler, Southeast Saskatchewan. International & Technology Assets United States: Oil shale leases and projects in the Uintah Basin, Utah, and Wyoming via equity investments in Red Leaf Resources. Brazil: Oil shale mining and resource interests located in São Mateus do Sul, Paraná. Jordan: Prospec-tier shale oil and energy assets in the Kingdom of Jordan. Clean Tech: Proprietary extraction methods like EcoShale and HCCO® technology testing. And now also Nova Scotia
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuThere has come a new independent survey of potential values in utica: United States Geological Survey published on September 30, 2026 a new geological assessment of Utica in eastern Canada. USGS estimates on average around 9 trillion cubic feet technically recoverable, hitherto undiscovered shale gas. It is thus a fresh, independent American governmental assessment confirming that the resource base is significant. USGS should there be extraction, the share values just from utica then: QGAS-37NOK - 600NOK QEC: 3,7NOK - 60NOK
- ·29.9.Something is afoot and these are good signs - semi-large blocks are being traded on the sly and it is a sign that someone knows something we don't!Government shenanigans, they have lawyers to handle the case, and are now throwing a report into the mix right in the middle of it all. I hope they get double penalized for this dirty trick
- ·25.9.Thinking a bit about the mediation taking place and brainstorming about what I wish was on the table. This is solely based on loose thoughts, but as an opponent of bureaucracy and a supporter of pragmatic solutions, I hope they are reading the Nordnet forum. Alternatives: A: QEC/QGAS/owners of other licenses can start producing asap following environmental requirements, but in return there is a low compensation amount. Production for a period going forward. B: More compensation, but more time spent before production. C: No/microscopic test production and compensation after many years in the legal system. D: No production and no compensation, after years in the legal system. Quebec: "Since we need energy, we wonder; should we go for alternative A or alternative B?" How large can compensation in alternative A and B become? Dream post, with a touch of realism in it: Small, shared pot of 10MCAD Larger pot for those who have sold out: 50MCAD Production for 20 years. (These are numbers pulled out of thin air, but hopefully they are the ones they are discussing) Small pot is distributed based on ownership fraction when the restriction was introduced. Those who have sold out share a larger pot. Owners of rights today are pulled out of the fraction and do not get compensation from this pot. Those who own rights today start production asap following environmental requirements. Production applies for 20 years. Tax system for gas income is set up as in Norway. (Unsure about what the tax system is like in Quebec, but like the model with special tax for oil and gas at 71.8%.) Result: Everyone gets a little. Those who have sold out get a little more. Those who own today can produce asap. Quebec is done with the case for 60MCAD, gets large tax revenues in the time ahead and lots of energy. The money Quebec earns they can build solar cells, windmills and dams for, then they are ready for the transition in 20 years. In 20 years Trump is dead and the civil war in the US is over.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 169 | - | - | ||
| 1 831 | - | - | ||
| 4 810 | - | - | ||
| 167 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt