2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
26 päivää sitten
0,01 CAD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | - | - | ||
| 9 | - | - | ||
| 9 | - | - | ||
| 150 | - | - | ||
| 3 776 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 7.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·3 t sittenAI summary: The article describes how Québec's former premier François Legault in 2021 advocated for a strong climate policy and made Québec one of the founders of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance. In 2022, the government subsequently adopted a ban on oil and gas extraction in the province and annulled the licenses of companies that wished to develop the Utica shale gas. One of these companies, Questerre Energy Corporation, rejected Québec's compensation offer and sued the province for approximately 18 billion dollars. The article argues that the situation has changed significantly since 2022: * Europe has gained a greater focus on energy security after the war in Ukraine and the conflicts in the Middle East. * Federal policy under Mark Carney is described as more focused on economy and energy supply. * Québec's new premier Christine Fréchette has opened up discussions on whether the ban on oil and gas extraction should be reconsidered. * Danielle Smith actively supports Québec developing its own gas resources. * Several analyses show that Québec may have natural gas reserves that could cover its own consumption for several decades and create significant economic value. The article also points out that both Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador are now opening up for more gas development, and that Québec may come under pressure to do the same. ⸻ What does this mean for QEC? For Questerre Energy Corporation, the article is clearly positive. 1. The political climate is changing Just a few years ago, it was almost unthinkable that a Québec government would discuss lifting the ban on gas extraction. Now the sitting premier says the matter can be reconsidered. This means that QEC's main argument – that Québec should develop its own gas resources rather than import American gas – gains greater political legitimacy. 2. QEC's negotiating position is strengthened If Québec itself begins to see value in the Utica gas, it will be more difficult for the province to argue that the resources have no value. This could be beneficial for QEC in the ongoing legal process concerning Bill 21 and the expropriation of the licenses. 3. Increased likelihood of a political solution If public opinion continues to move towards energy security and economic development, pressure may arise for: * repeal of the ban, * exceptions for certain projects, * or a negotiated settlement with QEC. There is still a long way to go, but the probability seems higher now than at any time since 2022. 4. Supports QEC's long-term strategy QEC has consistently argued that: * Québec needs its own energy, * natural gas can reduce imports from the USA, * local production can provide jobs and tax revenues. The article shows that these arguments are now being discussed much more openly in the political debate. 5. No immediate change It is important to emphasize that: * The 2022 ban is still in effect. * Parti Québécois and Québec solidaire are still strongly opposed to gas extraction. * There are elections in October, and the sovereignty question may dominate the election campaign. Thus, this is currently a signal of a changed mood, not a concrete political decision. ⸻ My assessment For QEC shareholders, this is one of the most interesting political comments published in 2026 so far. The article shows that the topic “Utica gas” has moved from being politically dead to once again being a legitimate part of the public debate in Québec. If this development continues through the election campaign and into 2027, the probability increases for both: 1. a stronger compensation claim against Québec, and/or 2. that the Utica project may eventually receive a new political assessment. For QEC, this is therefore a clearly positive signal, even if it does not yet change the legal realities.- 4 t sitten4 t sitten
·4 t sitten 
·3.6.So far, I have not seen a joint statement or official announcement of the meeting's outcome. The latest information circulating is still limited to what Danielle Smith hoped to address during the meeting, not what was actually agreed upon. One point, however, remains very important for Quebec: Danielle Smith stated before the meeting that she had repeatedly discussed with Quebec's leaders the development of Quebec's natural gas resources to achieve self-sufficiency and expand export capacity to Europe. She also said that Christine Fréchette had expressed willingness to reopen this discussion. Fréchette herself described the meeting as "exploratory", expressed interest in an east-west energy corridor, and stated that Quebecers' views on certain energy issues have changed in recent months, and that the province must adapt to the new circumstances. Honestly, for Questerre Energy's supporters: There is no announced breakthrough yet. But there are no negative signs either. The matter is still being discussed at the highest political level, which in itself would not have been normal a few years ago. I feel that the coming hours, or tomorrow morning (depending on when the data is released), will be more important than anything else. If the meeting concludes without a clear statement on energy, the market will perceive it as just a political gathering. But if there is an official discussion about the development of domestic resources, energy security, or policy reviews, this will have a completely different weight for QEC.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
26 päivää sitten
0,01 CAD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·3 t sittenAI summary: The article describes how Québec's former premier François Legault in 2021 advocated for a strong climate policy and made Québec one of the founders of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance. In 2022, the government subsequently adopted a ban on oil and gas extraction in the province and annulled the licenses of companies that wished to develop the Utica shale gas. One of these companies, Questerre Energy Corporation, rejected Québec's compensation offer and sued the province for approximately 18 billion dollars. The article argues that the situation has changed significantly since 2022: * Europe has gained a greater focus on energy security after the war in Ukraine and the conflicts in the Middle East. * Federal policy under Mark Carney is described as more focused on economy and energy supply. * Québec's new premier Christine Fréchette has opened up discussions on whether the ban on oil and gas extraction should be reconsidered. * Danielle Smith actively supports Québec developing its own gas resources. * Several analyses show that Québec may have natural gas reserves that could cover its own consumption for several decades and create significant economic value. The article also points out that both Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador are now opening up for more gas development, and that Québec may come under pressure to do the same. ⸻ What does this mean for QEC? For Questerre Energy Corporation, the article is clearly positive. 1. The political climate is changing Just a few years ago, it was almost unthinkable that a Québec government would discuss lifting the ban on gas extraction. Now the sitting premier says the matter can be reconsidered. This means that QEC's main argument – that Québec should develop its own gas resources rather than import American gas – gains greater political legitimacy. 2. QEC's negotiating position is strengthened If Québec itself begins to see value in the Utica gas, it will be more difficult for the province to argue that the resources have no value. This could be beneficial for QEC in the ongoing legal process concerning Bill 21 and the expropriation of the licenses. 3. Increased likelihood of a political solution If public opinion continues to move towards energy security and economic development, pressure may arise for: * repeal of the ban, * exceptions for certain projects, * or a negotiated settlement with QEC. There is still a long way to go, but the probability seems higher now than at any time since 2022. 4. Supports QEC's long-term strategy QEC has consistently argued that: * Québec needs its own energy, * natural gas can reduce imports from the USA, * local production can provide jobs and tax revenues. The article shows that these arguments are now being discussed much more openly in the political debate. 5. No immediate change It is important to emphasize that: * The 2022 ban is still in effect. * Parti Québécois and Québec solidaire are still strongly opposed to gas extraction. * There are elections in October, and the sovereignty question may dominate the election campaign. Thus, this is currently a signal of a changed mood, not a concrete political decision. ⸻ My assessment For QEC shareholders, this is one of the most interesting political comments published in 2026 so far. The article shows that the topic “Utica gas” has moved from being politically dead to once again being a legitimate part of the public debate in Québec. If this development continues through the election campaign and into 2027, the probability increases for both: 1. a stronger compensation claim against Québec, and/or 2. that the Utica project may eventually receive a new political assessment. For QEC, this is therefore a clearly positive signal, even if it does not yet change the legal realities.
- 4 t sitten4 t sitten·4 t sitten
- ·3.6.So far, I have not seen a joint statement or official announcement of the meeting's outcome. The latest information circulating is still limited to what Danielle Smith hoped to address during the meeting, not what was actually agreed upon. One point, however, remains very important for Quebec: Danielle Smith stated before the meeting that she had repeatedly discussed with Quebec's leaders the development of Quebec's natural gas resources to achieve self-sufficiency and expand export capacity to Europe. She also said that Christine Fréchette had expressed willingness to reopen this discussion. Fréchette herself described the meeting as "exploratory", expressed interest in an east-west energy corridor, and stated that Quebecers' views on certain energy issues have changed in recent months, and that the province must adapt to the new circumstances. Honestly, for Questerre Energy's supporters: There is no announced breakthrough yet. But there are no negative signs either. The matter is still being discussed at the highest political level, which in itself would not have been normal a few years ago. I feel that the coming hours, or tomorrow morning (depending on when the data is released), will be more important than anything else. If the meeting concludes without a clear statement on energy, the market will perceive it as just a political gathering. But if there is an official discussion about the development of domestic resources, energy security, or policy reviews, this will have a completely different weight for QEC.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | - | - | ||
| 9 | - | - | ||
| 9 | - | - | ||
| 150 | - | - | ||
| 3 776 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 7.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
26 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 11.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 31.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 7.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 |
0,01 CAD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·3 t sittenAI summary: The article describes how Québec's former premier François Legault in 2021 advocated for a strong climate policy and made Québec one of the founders of the Beyond Oil and Gas Alliance. In 2022, the government subsequently adopted a ban on oil and gas extraction in the province and annulled the licenses of companies that wished to develop the Utica shale gas. One of these companies, Questerre Energy Corporation, rejected Québec's compensation offer and sued the province for approximately 18 billion dollars. The article argues that the situation has changed significantly since 2022: * Europe has gained a greater focus on energy security after the war in Ukraine and the conflicts in the Middle East. * Federal policy under Mark Carney is described as more focused on economy and energy supply. * Québec's new premier Christine Fréchette has opened up discussions on whether the ban on oil and gas extraction should be reconsidered. * Danielle Smith actively supports Québec developing its own gas resources. * Several analyses show that Québec may have natural gas reserves that could cover its own consumption for several decades and create significant economic value. The article also points out that both Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador are now opening up for more gas development, and that Québec may come under pressure to do the same. ⸻ What does this mean for QEC? For Questerre Energy Corporation, the article is clearly positive. 1. The political climate is changing Just a few years ago, it was almost unthinkable that a Québec government would discuss lifting the ban on gas extraction. Now the sitting premier says the matter can be reconsidered. This means that QEC's main argument – that Québec should develop its own gas resources rather than import American gas – gains greater political legitimacy. 2. QEC's negotiating position is strengthened If Québec itself begins to see value in the Utica gas, it will be more difficult for the province to argue that the resources have no value. This could be beneficial for QEC in the ongoing legal process concerning Bill 21 and the expropriation of the licenses. 3. Increased likelihood of a political solution If public opinion continues to move towards energy security and economic development, pressure may arise for: * repeal of the ban, * exceptions for certain projects, * or a negotiated settlement with QEC. There is still a long way to go, but the probability seems higher now than at any time since 2022. 4. Supports QEC's long-term strategy QEC has consistently argued that: * Québec needs its own energy, * natural gas can reduce imports from the USA, * local production can provide jobs and tax revenues. The article shows that these arguments are now being discussed much more openly in the political debate. 5. No immediate change It is important to emphasize that: * The 2022 ban is still in effect. * Parti Québécois and Québec solidaire are still strongly opposed to gas extraction. * There are elections in October, and the sovereignty question may dominate the election campaign. Thus, this is currently a signal of a changed mood, not a concrete political decision. ⸻ My assessment For QEC shareholders, this is one of the most interesting political comments published in 2026 so far. The article shows that the topic “Utica gas” has moved from being politically dead to once again being a legitimate part of the public debate in Québec. If this development continues through the election campaign and into 2027, the probability increases for both: 1. a stronger compensation claim against Québec, and/or 2. that the Utica project may eventually receive a new political assessment. For QEC, this is therefore a clearly positive signal, even if it does not yet change the legal realities.
- 4 t sitten4 t sitten·4 t sitten
- ·3.6.So far, I have not seen a joint statement or official announcement of the meeting's outcome. The latest information circulating is still limited to what Danielle Smith hoped to address during the meeting, not what was actually agreed upon. One point, however, remains very important for Quebec: Danielle Smith stated before the meeting that she had repeatedly discussed with Quebec's leaders the development of Quebec's natural gas resources to achieve self-sufficiency and expand export capacity to Europe. She also said that Christine Fréchette had expressed willingness to reopen this discussion. Fréchette herself described the meeting as "exploratory", expressed interest in an east-west energy corridor, and stated that Quebecers' views on certain energy issues have changed in recent months, and that the province must adapt to the new circumstances. Honestly, for Questerre Energy's supporters: There is no announced breakthrough yet. But there are no negative signs either. The matter is still being discussed at the highest political level, which in itself would not have been normal a few years ago. I feel that the coming hours, or tomorrow morning (depending on when the data is released), will be more important than anything else. If the meeting concludes without a clear statement on energy, the market will perceive it as just a political gathering. But if there is an official discussion about the development of domestic resources, energy security, or policy reviews, this will have a completely different weight for QEC.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | - | - | ||
| 9 | - | - | ||
| 9 | - | - | ||
| 150 | - | - | ||
| 3 776 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt