2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
123 päivää sitten
0,01 CAD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 768 | - | - | ||
| 2 231 | - | - | ||
| 1 000 | - | - | ||
| 4 922 | - | - | ||
| 500 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 8.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.3.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·7 t sittenHi there, I've been playing around a bit with AI and have come up with a calculation based on an oil price of 80, and looked a bit at the price in relation to EBITA. It would be interesting if someone who can do the math could review if this looks logical. If we compare Questerre (QEC) with the big giants on the Oslo Stock Exchange, such as Aker BP and Vår Energi, we see an enormous difference in how the market values every krone the companies earn. Large, established companies are priced with a "premium" because they have stable operations and pay fixed dividends. Small companies like QEC are priced with a "discount" due to higher risk. Here is the calculation if QEC were priced with the same multiples as the big guys (based on figures from March 2026): 1. Comparison of multiples (EV/EBITDA) This figure tells how many years of operating profit (EBITDA) the market is willing to pay for the entire company including debt. | Company | EV/EBITDA (Est. 2026) | Comment | |---|---|---| | Aker BP | ~2.5x – 3.0x | High confidence, enormous dividends, low risk. | | Vår Energi | ~2.2x – 2.4x | Stable growth, focus on dividends. | | Questerre (Now) | ~0.7x – 1.0x | Extremely low priced (high risk-discount). | 2. What would the QEC share be worth? If we use our estimates for QEC ($125m EBITDA v/$80 oil) and give them the same valuation as the large companies, the share price would look like this: Scenario A: Priced like Vår Energi (2.3x EBITDA) * Enterprise Value: $125m x 2.3 = $287 million * Minus net debt: $287m - $35m = $252 million (Equity value) * Share price: ~5.80 NOK * (Upside from today's price: +175 %) Scenario B: Priced like Aker BP (2.8x EBITDA) * Enterprise Value: $125m x 2.8 = $350 million * Minus net debt: $350m - $35m = $315 million (Equity value) * Share price: ~7.20 NOK * (Upside from today's price: +240 %) 3. Why is there such a big gap? Even though the calculation above shows a theoretical price of over 7 kroner, there are several reasons why QEC is not traded there today: * Size and Liquidity: Large funds can easily buy into Aker BP. QEC is too small for the largest investors, which keeps the price down. * Dividend: Aker BP and Vår Energi send billions back to shareholders every quarter. QEC must first prove that they can pay down the debt and be left with cash. * Jurisdiction: Norway (NCS) is considered one of the safest places in the world for oil production. Brazil has higher political risk, which requires a higher "risk premium" (lower price). In summary: If QEC manages to deliver stable figures through 2026 and eliminate the debt, it is natural that their multiples approach the rest of the sector. Even a moderate repricing to 1.5x EBITDA (which is still far below Aker BP) would send the share price closer to 3.50 – 4.00 NOK.
·1 päivä sittenThe sale of motney as well as escalation in the Middle East. Very strange that this isn't shooting up today. For some reason, everything happens on weekends😂
·1 päivä sittenYes, very strange indeed 🤡·10 t sittenSo you, odeand😂 get out into nature a bit, breathe in the beautiful Norwegian mountain scent. It will be exciting with the oil price on Monday, in short good luck with the algo🤣 px is hoarding money now. The so-called debt you refer to all the time is soon paid 😊 I wonder what you will be able to complain about then.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
123 päivää sitten
0,01 CAD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·7 t sittenHi there, I've been playing around a bit with AI and have come up with a calculation based on an oil price of 80, and looked a bit at the price in relation to EBITA. It would be interesting if someone who can do the math could review if this looks logical. If we compare Questerre (QEC) with the big giants on the Oslo Stock Exchange, such as Aker BP and Vår Energi, we see an enormous difference in how the market values every krone the companies earn. Large, established companies are priced with a "premium" because they have stable operations and pay fixed dividends. Small companies like QEC are priced with a "discount" due to higher risk. Here is the calculation if QEC were priced with the same multiples as the big guys (based on figures from March 2026): 1. Comparison of multiples (EV/EBITDA) This figure tells how many years of operating profit (EBITDA) the market is willing to pay for the entire company including debt. | Company | EV/EBITDA (Est. 2026) | Comment | |---|---|---| | Aker BP | ~2.5x – 3.0x | High confidence, enormous dividends, low risk. | | Vår Energi | ~2.2x – 2.4x | Stable growth, focus on dividends. | | Questerre (Now) | ~0.7x – 1.0x | Extremely low priced (high risk-discount). | 2. What would the QEC share be worth? If we use our estimates for QEC ($125m EBITDA v/$80 oil) and give them the same valuation as the large companies, the share price would look like this: Scenario A: Priced like Vår Energi (2.3x EBITDA) * Enterprise Value: $125m x 2.3 = $287 million * Minus net debt: $287m - $35m = $252 million (Equity value) * Share price: ~5.80 NOK * (Upside from today's price: +175 %) Scenario B: Priced like Aker BP (2.8x EBITDA) * Enterprise Value: $125m x 2.8 = $350 million * Minus net debt: $350m - $35m = $315 million (Equity value) * Share price: ~7.20 NOK * (Upside from today's price: +240 %) 3. Why is there such a big gap? Even though the calculation above shows a theoretical price of over 7 kroner, there are several reasons why QEC is not traded there today: * Size and Liquidity: Large funds can easily buy into Aker BP. QEC is too small for the largest investors, which keeps the price down. * Dividend: Aker BP and Vår Energi send billions back to shareholders every quarter. QEC must first prove that they can pay down the debt and be left with cash. * Jurisdiction: Norway (NCS) is considered one of the safest places in the world for oil production. Brazil has higher political risk, which requires a higher "risk premium" (lower price). In summary: If QEC manages to deliver stable figures through 2026 and eliminate the debt, it is natural that their multiples approach the rest of the sector. Even a moderate repricing to 1.5x EBITDA (which is still far below Aker BP) would send the share price closer to 3.50 – 4.00 NOK.
- ·1 päivä sittenThe sale of motney as well as escalation in the Middle East. Very strange that this isn't shooting up today. For some reason, everything happens on weekends😂·1 päivä sittenYes, very strange indeed 🤡·10 t sittenSo you, odeand😂 get out into nature a bit, breathe in the beautiful Norwegian mountain scent. It will be exciting with the oil price on Monday, in short good luck with the algo🤣 px is hoarding money now. The so-called debt you refer to all the time is soon paid 😊 I wonder what you will be able to complain about then.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 768 | - | - | ||
| 2 231 | - | - | ||
| 1 000 | - | - | ||
| 4 922 | - | - | ||
| 500 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 8.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.3.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2024 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
123 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.3. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 8.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 14.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.3.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 12.11.2024 |
0,01 CAD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·7 t sittenHi there, I've been playing around a bit with AI and have come up with a calculation based on an oil price of 80, and looked a bit at the price in relation to EBITA. It would be interesting if someone who can do the math could review if this looks logical. If we compare Questerre (QEC) with the big giants on the Oslo Stock Exchange, such as Aker BP and Vår Energi, we see an enormous difference in how the market values every krone the companies earn. Large, established companies are priced with a "premium" because they have stable operations and pay fixed dividends. Small companies like QEC are priced with a "discount" due to higher risk. Here is the calculation if QEC were priced with the same multiples as the big guys (based on figures from March 2026): 1. Comparison of multiples (EV/EBITDA) This figure tells how many years of operating profit (EBITDA) the market is willing to pay for the entire company including debt. | Company | EV/EBITDA (Est. 2026) | Comment | |---|---|---| | Aker BP | ~2.5x – 3.0x | High confidence, enormous dividends, low risk. | | Vår Energi | ~2.2x – 2.4x | Stable growth, focus on dividends. | | Questerre (Now) | ~0.7x – 1.0x | Extremely low priced (high risk-discount). | 2. What would the QEC share be worth? If we use our estimates for QEC ($125m EBITDA v/$80 oil) and give them the same valuation as the large companies, the share price would look like this: Scenario A: Priced like Vår Energi (2.3x EBITDA) * Enterprise Value: $125m x 2.3 = $287 million * Minus net debt: $287m - $35m = $252 million (Equity value) * Share price: ~5.80 NOK * (Upside from today's price: +175 %) Scenario B: Priced like Aker BP (2.8x EBITDA) * Enterprise Value: $125m x 2.8 = $350 million * Minus net debt: $350m - $35m = $315 million (Equity value) * Share price: ~7.20 NOK * (Upside from today's price: +240 %) 3. Why is there such a big gap? Even though the calculation above shows a theoretical price of over 7 kroner, there are several reasons why QEC is not traded there today: * Size and Liquidity: Large funds can easily buy into Aker BP. QEC is too small for the largest investors, which keeps the price down. * Dividend: Aker BP and Vår Energi send billions back to shareholders every quarter. QEC must first prove that they can pay down the debt and be left with cash. * Jurisdiction: Norway (NCS) is considered one of the safest places in the world for oil production. Brazil has higher political risk, which requires a higher "risk premium" (lower price). In summary: If QEC manages to deliver stable figures through 2026 and eliminate the debt, it is natural that their multiples approach the rest of the sector. Even a moderate repricing to 1.5x EBITDA (which is still far below Aker BP) would send the share price closer to 3.50 – 4.00 NOK.
- ·1 päivä sittenThe sale of motney as well as escalation in the Middle East. Very strange that this isn't shooting up today. For some reason, everything happens on weekends😂·1 päivä sittenYes, very strange indeed 🤡·10 t sittenSo you, odeand😂 get out into nature a bit, breathe in the beautiful Norwegian mountain scent. It will be exciting with the oil price on Monday, in short good luck with the algo🤣 px is hoarding money now. The so-called debt you refer to all the time is soon paid 😊 I wonder what you will be able to complain about then.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 768 | - | - | ||
| 2 231 | - | - | ||
| 1 000 | - | - | ||
| 4 922 | - | - | ||
| 500 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt