2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
121 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·7 t sittenMark has lost the plot when he demands that the company's owners (shareholders) must pay to get access to information about the company. He has a duty to inform the owners about all material information. The absurdities are piling up here.
·2 t sitten · MuokattuØbo He has a very good reason to keep it behind a paywall - Watch the latest Live stream he has made and then you would find out why. If you are a shareholder who wants to get your investment back, you should rather be glad that he is thinking it through :)
·1 päivä sittenFor everyone who wants to look at the documents themselves: https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-56-the-board-folder?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v- ·1 päivä sittenThe constructed "earn-out" agreement of 217 mkr Mark says 1 to 1 that the "earn-out" agreement is designed in case of bankruptcy/dismissal and that the agreement was changed the year after the original agreement was entered into. I well understand a liquidator questioning whether the agreement is valid, when the agreement primarily serves the purpose of emptying the company. Entering into an agreement where the company is obligated beyond its capabilities can render an agreement invalid, and therefore the liquidator says no, it is not a real creditor claim, but only designed to be a "poison pill" if SR should fall. The agreement is not reasonable and the agreement has payment terms which alone could drive the company into bankruptcy. Looking forward to May 11th, when a restructuring will be negotiated, but I think the real creditors will fight against this fraudulent enterprise being able to continue.·1 päivä sittenAt present, much of what is being discussed remains unresolved and based on interpretations. The earn-out structure can be criticized, but it can also be understood as a way to manage risk in case of termination or insolvency. This does not in itself make it fraud. The only issue that has so far been concretely problematized to some extent relates to the 'pump' around Lars Topholm. Furthermore, the rest must be clarified by the courts. If the promissory note defense is recognized, it could significantly change the understanding of the entire process. Until then, it makes the most sense to let the legal process take its course rather than drawing firm conclusions.·16 t sittenI can see that Mark has adjusted his wording now and speaks of a "reprimand" to Topholm, instead of "documented pump n dump". I am apparently not entirely off track and it pleases me that my messages and objective assessments are being adopted by Mark and hopefully also by you BQRS and others here.
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen can one sell/ when is it declared bankrupt so one can use it to offset tax from the sale of other shares? 😁 I'm about to sell shares, but don't know if it's stupid to do before this share has been marked as a loss so I can use this loss to sell other shares without tax?
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuIt's hard to say, but it's a hearing on May 11th in the Maritime and Commercial Court where it will be dealt with, and here it can end with liquidation/bankruptcy or reconstruction, we will know more on May 11th. The CEO and a number of shareholders are going all in on reconstruction based on the principle that it's better to preserve than to destroy value. Read more here, it's being fought tooth and nail. https://substack.wildceo.live/p As you can see, the CEO has been very active, the other party, however, is silent as the grave.·1 päivä sittenKloun As always, I am pleased that I can contribute to the objective debate here. As previously written, the lawyer works under both confidentiality and professional secrecy. I therefore have no objective reasons to question the secrecy. It is expected in my view. Should the trustee have done something wrong, then I think that discussion belongs when a court has spoken. - ·3 päivää sittenToday's live. Hope this answers the questions you asked. Good weekend https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-55-friday-q-and-a-jrgen?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v
·14 t sittenWe just hold here.·14 t sittenProgression generally does not see any proof of anything Mark Abraham writes on Substack, this despite the fact that Mark Abraham has company inside knowledge and at the same time spends all his waking hours rebuilding the company, draw your own conclusion about what motive Progression might have,
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
121 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·7 t sittenMark has lost the plot when he demands that the company's owners (shareholders) must pay to get access to information about the company. He has a duty to inform the owners about all material information. The absurdities are piling up here.·2 t sitten · MuokattuØbo He has a very good reason to keep it behind a paywall - Watch the latest Live stream he has made and then you would find out why. If you are a shareholder who wants to get your investment back, you should rather be glad that he is thinking it through :)
- ·1 päivä sittenFor everyone who wants to look at the documents themselves: https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-56-the-board-folder?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v
- ·1 päivä sittenThe constructed "earn-out" agreement of 217 mkr Mark says 1 to 1 that the "earn-out" agreement is designed in case of bankruptcy/dismissal and that the agreement was changed the year after the original agreement was entered into. I well understand a liquidator questioning whether the agreement is valid, when the agreement primarily serves the purpose of emptying the company. Entering into an agreement where the company is obligated beyond its capabilities can render an agreement invalid, and therefore the liquidator says no, it is not a real creditor claim, but only designed to be a "poison pill" if SR should fall. The agreement is not reasonable and the agreement has payment terms which alone could drive the company into bankruptcy. Looking forward to May 11th, when a restructuring will be negotiated, but I think the real creditors will fight against this fraudulent enterprise being able to continue.·1 päivä sittenAt present, much of what is being discussed remains unresolved and based on interpretations. The earn-out structure can be criticized, but it can also be understood as a way to manage risk in case of termination or insolvency. This does not in itself make it fraud. The only issue that has so far been concretely problematized to some extent relates to the 'pump' around Lars Topholm. Furthermore, the rest must be clarified by the courts. If the promissory note defense is recognized, it could significantly change the understanding of the entire process. Until then, it makes the most sense to let the legal process take its course rather than drawing firm conclusions.·16 t sittenI can see that Mark has adjusted his wording now and speaks of a "reprimand" to Topholm, instead of "documented pump n dump". I am apparently not entirely off track and it pleases me that my messages and objective assessments are being adopted by Mark and hopefully also by you BQRS and others here.
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen can one sell/ when is it declared bankrupt so one can use it to offset tax from the sale of other shares? 😁 I'm about to sell shares, but don't know if it's stupid to do before this share has been marked as a loss so I can use this loss to sell other shares without tax?·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuIt's hard to say, but it's a hearing on May 11th in the Maritime and Commercial Court where it will be dealt with, and here it can end with liquidation/bankruptcy or reconstruction, we will know more on May 11th. The CEO and a number of shareholders are going all in on reconstruction based on the principle that it's better to preserve than to destroy value. Read more here, it's being fought tooth and nail. https://substack.wildceo.live/p As you can see, the CEO has been very active, the other party, however, is silent as the grave.·1 päivä sittenKloun As always, I am pleased that I can contribute to the objective debate here. As previously written, the lawyer works under both confidentiality and professional secrecy. I therefore have no objective reasons to question the secrecy. It is expected in my view. Should the trustee have done something wrong, then I think that discussion belongs when a court has spoken.
- ·3 päivää sittenToday's live. Hope this answers the questions you asked. Good weekend https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-55-friday-q-and-a-jrgen?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v·14 t sittenWe just hold here.·14 t sittenProgression generally does not see any proof of anything Mark Abraham writes on Substack, this despite the fact that Mark Abraham has company inside knowledge and at the same time spends all his waking hours rebuilding the company, draw your own conclusion about what motive Progression might have,
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
121 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·7 t sittenMark has lost the plot when he demands that the company's owners (shareholders) must pay to get access to information about the company. He has a duty to inform the owners about all material information. The absurdities are piling up here.·2 t sitten · MuokattuØbo He has a very good reason to keep it behind a paywall - Watch the latest Live stream he has made and then you would find out why. If you are a shareholder who wants to get your investment back, you should rather be glad that he is thinking it through :)
- ·1 päivä sittenFor everyone who wants to look at the documents themselves: https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-56-the-board-folder?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v
- ·1 päivä sittenThe constructed "earn-out" agreement of 217 mkr Mark says 1 to 1 that the "earn-out" agreement is designed in case of bankruptcy/dismissal and that the agreement was changed the year after the original agreement was entered into. I well understand a liquidator questioning whether the agreement is valid, when the agreement primarily serves the purpose of emptying the company. Entering into an agreement where the company is obligated beyond its capabilities can render an agreement invalid, and therefore the liquidator says no, it is not a real creditor claim, but only designed to be a "poison pill" if SR should fall. The agreement is not reasonable and the agreement has payment terms which alone could drive the company into bankruptcy. Looking forward to May 11th, when a restructuring will be negotiated, but I think the real creditors will fight against this fraudulent enterprise being able to continue.·1 päivä sittenAt present, much of what is being discussed remains unresolved and based on interpretations. The earn-out structure can be criticized, but it can also be understood as a way to manage risk in case of termination or insolvency. This does not in itself make it fraud. The only issue that has so far been concretely problematized to some extent relates to the 'pump' around Lars Topholm. Furthermore, the rest must be clarified by the courts. If the promissory note defense is recognized, it could significantly change the understanding of the entire process. Until then, it makes the most sense to let the legal process take its course rather than drawing firm conclusions.·16 t sittenI can see that Mark has adjusted his wording now and speaks of a "reprimand" to Topholm, instead of "documented pump n dump". I am apparently not entirely off track and it pleases me that my messages and objective assessments are being adopted by Mark and hopefully also by you BQRS and others here.
- ·1 päivä sittenWhen can one sell/ when is it declared bankrupt so one can use it to offset tax from the sale of other shares? 😁 I'm about to sell shares, but don't know if it's stupid to do before this share has been marked as a loss so I can use this loss to sell other shares without tax?·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuIt's hard to say, but it's a hearing on May 11th in the Maritime and Commercial Court where it will be dealt with, and here it can end with liquidation/bankruptcy or reconstruction, we will know more on May 11th. The CEO and a number of shareholders are going all in on reconstruction based on the principle that it's better to preserve than to destroy value. Read more here, it's being fought tooth and nail. https://substack.wildceo.live/p As you can see, the CEO has been very active, the other party, however, is silent as the grave.·1 päivä sittenKloun As always, I am pleased that I can contribute to the objective debate here. As previously written, the lawyer works under both confidentiality and professional secrecy. I therefore have no objective reasons to question the secrecy. It is expected in my view. Should the trustee have done something wrong, then I think that discussion belongs when a court has spoken.
- ·3 päivää sittenToday's live. Hope this answers the questions you asked. Good weekend https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-55-friday-q-and-a-jrgen?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v·14 t sittenWe just hold here.·14 t sittenProgression generally does not see any proof of anything Mark Abraham writes on Substack, this despite the fact that Mark Abraham has company inside knowledge and at the same time spends all his waking hours rebuilding the company, draw your own conclusion about what motive Progression might have,
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt