2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
135 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·1 t sittenI check the comment thread on this stock from time to time, but nothing crucially new has happened from time to time. One lawsuit follows another, it's not moving an inch, so to speak, and in the meantime, SR's entire business foundation must have eroded away. This, consequently, will then lead to a flurry of compensation claims and lawsuits, but that's not running a business, it's a soap opera of a courtroom drama. There is probably not much value left in the company and IP for some robotics technology that has not been developed for at least the past year, where the Chinese, in particular, are literally sprinting ahead in the field, is not worth the paper it's written on. A restructuring will therefore be the same as starting a company from scratch, and there are no startups that get listed on the stock exchange from day 1. Mark Abraham has fought a brave battle, but surely no one is so naive as to believe that he won't get paid for this work if a restructuring were to succeed. This could, for example, be in the form of existing shareholders being sidelined in one way or another, as has been seen, for example, in SAS. This would give Mark Abraham the opportunity, especially if his partner's 3-digit million claim against the company survives a restructuring wholly or partially, to gain full control. In that situation, we existing shareholders have merely acted as alibis and useful idiots 😊 #usefulidiot
·22 min sittenNim It's hard to disagree with your observations, when it's largely 1 to 1 what I have written since November 28, 2025.
·3 t sitten · MuokattuA little further explanation regarding Børsen's article on Sunday. As Mark has written in this post - and with direct reference to the judgment, it has not been appealed by the Romanian authorities!! https://substack.wildceo.live/p/qed-brsen-kiertzner-and-the-case?utm_source=publication-search·2 t sittenBo What has SR delivered in terms of equipment or service to the customer? When I read "the verdict", it looks like a ruling in a case that overturns SR being excluded from a tender. It says nothing about SR having a real contract or having delivered any sales.... it sounds very mysterious and the Danish auditor slipped away...
·19 t sittenFrom Børsen Sunday: "Børsen can now reveal that Shape Robotics has never seen the shadow of most of the millions that the company booked as revenue in the second quarter of 2025. Two-thirds of the DKK 60 million revenue that Shape Robotics booked in the quarter is, according to Børsen's information, based on a compensation claim for a share of a grant that the company never received." My question: Is it even legal to book revenue that one has not yet received in cash? Surely it should only be booked as a receivable?
·3 t sittenYou must go to court with your accusations and questions or take 1v1, which you then find beneath your dignity, I cannot help you. my agenda is reconstruction not what has been stated in specific annual reports or similar in the past, Reconstruction provides access to auditor and loans and Nasdaq can be opened again, that is the logical outcome in this matter and if it cannot bear, then it is as it is, you can surely not disagree with that.- 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu1 päivä sitten · MuokattuSaw an article on Borsen https://substack.com/@wildceo/note/c-259966822?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action·20 t sittenI wonder if Børsen.dk and Finans.dk are getting the blame for Mark's bookkeeping? Or maybe Teis? One understands better and better why the auditor declined. #InsightfulAndCriticalInvestor
2 t sitten2 t sittenTämä julkaisu on poistettu.
·1 päivä sittenLet's just assume now that they get the company up and running again, then my assumption is that it has taken so much damage that it almost has to start from zero. I.e. Yes, companies can continue in that case but one must probably expect the stock price to fall 90% (again, that's just my guess). So as I see it, it doesn't matter much which way it falls, I think my money is lost regardless. Hakunamata - and look forward. Regarding buy or sell, it's always easy to see afterwards. Now I don't know when you bought in. If it was at the end of last year then you speculated, and took the risk, but I think many of us saw an opportunity for long-term business expansion with a corresponding price increase if shape could otherwise keep track of their cash flow·16 t sittenAntares The shares are probably also worthless, even if it were to end with a reconstruction. #insightful and critical investor
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
135 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenI check the comment thread on this stock from time to time, but nothing crucially new has happened from time to time. One lawsuit follows another, it's not moving an inch, so to speak, and in the meantime, SR's entire business foundation must have eroded away. This, consequently, will then lead to a flurry of compensation claims and lawsuits, but that's not running a business, it's a soap opera of a courtroom drama. There is probably not much value left in the company and IP for some robotics technology that has not been developed for at least the past year, where the Chinese, in particular, are literally sprinting ahead in the field, is not worth the paper it's written on. A restructuring will therefore be the same as starting a company from scratch, and there are no startups that get listed on the stock exchange from day 1. Mark Abraham has fought a brave battle, but surely no one is so naive as to believe that he won't get paid for this work if a restructuring were to succeed. This could, for example, be in the form of existing shareholders being sidelined in one way or another, as has been seen, for example, in SAS. This would give Mark Abraham the opportunity, especially if his partner's 3-digit million claim against the company survives a restructuring wholly or partially, to gain full control. In that situation, we existing shareholders have merely acted as alibis and useful idiots 😊 #usefulidiot·22 min sittenNim It's hard to disagree with your observations, when it's largely 1 to 1 what I have written since November 28, 2025.
- ·3 t sitten · MuokattuA little further explanation regarding Børsen's article on Sunday. As Mark has written in this post - and with direct reference to the judgment, it has not been appealed by the Romanian authorities!! https://substack.wildceo.live/p/qed-brsen-kiertzner-and-the-case?utm_source=publication-search·2 t sittenBo What has SR delivered in terms of equipment or service to the customer? When I read "the verdict", it looks like a ruling in a case that overturns SR being excluded from a tender. It says nothing about SR having a real contract or having delivered any sales.... it sounds very mysterious and the Danish auditor slipped away...
- ·19 t sittenFrom Børsen Sunday: "Børsen can now reveal that Shape Robotics has never seen the shadow of most of the millions that the company booked as revenue in the second quarter of 2025. Two-thirds of the DKK 60 million revenue that Shape Robotics booked in the quarter is, according to Børsen's information, based on a compensation claim for a share of a grant that the company never received." My question: Is it even legal to book revenue that one has not yet received in cash? Surely it should only be booked as a receivable?·3 t sittenYou must go to court with your accusations and questions or take 1v1, which you then find beneath your dignity, I cannot help you. my agenda is reconstruction not what has been stated in specific annual reports or similar in the past, Reconstruction provides access to auditor and loans and Nasdaq can be opened again, that is the logical outcome in this matter and if it cannot bear, then it is as it is, you can surely not disagree with that.
- 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu1 päivä sitten · MuokattuSaw an article on Borsen https://substack.com/@wildceo/note/c-259966822?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action·20 t sittenI wonder if Børsen.dk and Finans.dk are getting the blame for Mark's bookkeeping? Or maybe Teis? One understands better and better why the auditor declined. #InsightfulAndCriticalInvestor
- 2 t sitten2 t sittenTämä julkaisu on poistettu.·1 päivä sittenLet's just assume now that they get the company up and running again, then my assumption is that it has taken so much damage that it almost has to start from zero. I.e. Yes, companies can continue in that case but one must probably expect the stock price to fall 90% (again, that's just my guess). So as I see it, it doesn't matter much which way it falls, I think my money is lost regardless. Hakunamata - and look forward. Regarding buy or sell, it's always easy to see afterwards. Now I don't know when you bought in. If it was at the end of last year then you speculated, and took the risk, but I think many of us saw an opportunity for long-term business expansion with a corresponding price increase if shape could otherwise keep track of their cash flow·16 t sittenAntares The shares are probably also worthless, even if it were to end with a reconstruction. #insightful and critical investor
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
135 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenI check the comment thread on this stock from time to time, but nothing crucially new has happened from time to time. One lawsuit follows another, it's not moving an inch, so to speak, and in the meantime, SR's entire business foundation must have eroded away. This, consequently, will then lead to a flurry of compensation claims and lawsuits, but that's not running a business, it's a soap opera of a courtroom drama. There is probably not much value left in the company and IP for some robotics technology that has not been developed for at least the past year, where the Chinese, in particular, are literally sprinting ahead in the field, is not worth the paper it's written on. A restructuring will therefore be the same as starting a company from scratch, and there are no startups that get listed on the stock exchange from day 1. Mark Abraham has fought a brave battle, but surely no one is so naive as to believe that he won't get paid for this work if a restructuring were to succeed. This could, for example, be in the form of existing shareholders being sidelined in one way or another, as has been seen, for example, in SAS. This would give Mark Abraham the opportunity, especially if his partner's 3-digit million claim against the company survives a restructuring wholly or partially, to gain full control. In that situation, we existing shareholders have merely acted as alibis and useful idiots 😊 #usefulidiot·22 min sittenNim It's hard to disagree with your observations, when it's largely 1 to 1 what I have written since November 28, 2025.
- ·3 t sitten · MuokattuA little further explanation regarding Børsen's article on Sunday. As Mark has written in this post - and with direct reference to the judgment, it has not been appealed by the Romanian authorities!! https://substack.wildceo.live/p/qed-brsen-kiertzner-and-the-case?utm_source=publication-search·2 t sittenBo What has SR delivered in terms of equipment or service to the customer? When I read "the verdict", it looks like a ruling in a case that overturns SR being excluded from a tender. It says nothing about SR having a real contract or having delivered any sales.... it sounds very mysterious and the Danish auditor slipped away...
- ·19 t sittenFrom Børsen Sunday: "Børsen can now reveal that Shape Robotics has never seen the shadow of most of the millions that the company booked as revenue in the second quarter of 2025. Two-thirds of the DKK 60 million revenue that Shape Robotics booked in the quarter is, according to Børsen's information, based on a compensation claim for a share of a grant that the company never received." My question: Is it even legal to book revenue that one has not yet received in cash? Surely it should only be booked as a receivable?·3 t sittenYou must go to court with your accusations and questions or take 1v1, which you then find beneath your dignity, I cannot help you. my agenda is reconstruction not what has been stated in specific annual reports or similar in the past, Reconstruction provides access to auditor and loans and Nasdaq can be opened again, that is the logical outcome in this matter and if it cannot bear, then it is as it is, you can surely not disagree with that.
- 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu1 päivä sitten · MuokattuSaw an article on Borsen https://substack.com/@wildceo/note/c-259966822?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action·20 t sittenI wonder if Børsen.dk and Finans.dk are getting the blame for Mark's bookkeeping? Or maybe Teis? One understands better and better why the auditor declined. #InsightfulAndCriticalInvestor
- 2 t sitten2 t sittenTämä julkaisu on poistettu.·1 päivä sittenLet's just assume now that they get the company up and running again, then my assumption is that it has taken so much damage that it almost has to start from zero. I.e. Yes, companies can continue in that case but one must probably expect the stock price to fall 90% (again, that's just my guess). So as I see it, it doesn't matter much which way it falls, I think my money is lost regardless. Hakunamata - and look forward. Regarding buy or sell, it's always easy to see afterwards. Now I don't know when you bought in. If it was at the end of last year then you speculated, and took the risk, but I think many of us saw an opportunity for long-term business expansion with a corresponding price increase if shape could otherwise keep track of their cash flow·16 t sittenAntares The shares are probably also worthless, even if it were to end with a reconstruction. #insightful and critical investor
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt