2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
133 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
37 min sitten · Muokattu37 min sitten · MuokattuSaw an article on Borsen https://substack.com/@wildceo/note/c-259966822?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
·1 t sittenHello all readers. I am a small investor, still at the beginner stage. I have been following along from the sidelines and have read quite a bit back and forth between some different daily co-investors in here. (Maybe you should take a breather from each other, smiles) I have a question that perhaps is a bit obvious. But should it now happen that shape gets back on track, will the assets we have then become worth something again, or are they already lost and merely awaiting a final decision to be written off as a loss? Thanks in advance and if my question seems weird or silly, then I apologize But as written, beginner stage. 😊
·1 t sittenWelcome. Yes, the tone can get a bit shrill. It has been seen before in other cases where an investment has gone off track. If the company gets back on track, will the shares then be worth something? Well, maybe. Values are a funny thing, after all. A value only exists if someone is willing to pay for "the value". Realistically speaking - the value is with very high probability 0 kr. per share. Someone will surely think otherwise and they are welcome to contribute and have their assessment included, on equal terms. We don't know the future and maybe something surprising and unforeseen will happen.·41 min sitten · MuokattuYou are right about that. My approach was probably a rookie mistake or a poor interpretation of the famous words "time in the market beats timing of the market". In hindsight, I probably should have sold instead of bought. But that's just how it is. You have to fall before you can rise. 😊 However, I still hope that they will come back. That would be nice for the portfolio 🙈- ·3 t sitten · MuokattuThinking a bit outside the box this lovely Saturday Does Mark Abraham deliberately send SR Rumænien into restructuring to ensure the company doesn't get caught by the Danish bankruptcy and Teis? SR Rumænien is formally owned by the Danish company, which is why the value, if any, belongs to the estate or whatever it ends up being. But the move of Mark sending the company into restructuring I cannot fathom. What real business is there in Romania today and is it really just a chess move to ensure Teis doesn't have direct access to the company because Romanian law steps in and "secures" the company? It's otherwise an interesting headline from Børsen.dk today. Unfortunately, I cannot read the content myself, but I would not be surprised if revenue has been pumped and manipulated by Mark, who I assume was CEO at the time of recognizing an uncertain lawsuit.
·2 t sittenFrom Mark:·2 t sittenWelcome back BQRS Your non-communication is a bit odd. Have you gotten a handle on the Danish bankruptcy law? - 5 t sitten5 t sitten“Shape Robotics Romania Has Entered Reconstruction Proceedings. The Battlefield Has Just Doubled In Size.” https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-69-romania-enters-the?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios
·2 t sittenYes. If it is rejected, then we will have a deduction for the loss at some point. A claim of 550 million against the company is also a significant part.·1 t sittenKloun Thanks for the choice of words for "The illegal bankruptcy". In round figures, there is approx. 250 mio. kr to Mark's girlfriend, nephew (or similar) and the father In addition, a small 200 mo. kr. from the Romanian bank that "financed" the company's receivables. That leaves 100 mio kr for all sorts of other things, including Danske Bank, Eifo, the state etc. It is probably only the approx. 250 mio. which are a direct consequence of the bankruptcy The 200 mio. kr. could potentially have been mortgaged with fictitious figures, now that we also hear Børsen.dk mention, what I also said in November, that revenue and debtors resembled something that could well be inflated/fictitious. Therefore, it cannot unequivocally be said that it arose as a result of the bankruptcy. - ·1 päivä sittenHaven't followed much, so I apologize if this has been answered. What is Andre Fehrn's role in this? Shouldn't he, as Chairman of the Board, have seen it coming? Especially since as a former CEO he should know the company in detail.
·6 t sitten · MuokattuI think the entire board of directors must know what has transpired, and what condition the company was/is in based on the financial statements. There is also the possibility that they are keeping a low profile for various reasons. There is quite a bit of boasting about the company's previous turnaround, so where is the money now when bills were not paid.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
133 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 37 min sitten · Muokattu37 min sitten · MuokattuSaw an article on Borsen https://substack.com/@wildceo/note/c-259966822?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
- ·1 t sittenHello all readers. I am a small investor, still at the beginner stage. I have been following along from the sidelines and have read quite a bit back and forth between some different daily co-investors in here. (Maybe you should take a breather from each other, smiles) I have a question that perhaps is a bit obvious. But should it now happen that shape gets back on track, will the assets we have then become worth something again, or are they already lost and merely awaiting a final decision to be written off as a loss? Thanks in advance and if my question seems weird or silly, then I apologize But as written, beginner stage. 😊·1 t sittenWelcome. Yes, the tone can get a bit shrill. It has been seen before in other cases where an investment has gone off track. If the company gets back on track, will the shares then be worth something? Well, maybe. Values are a funny thing, after all. A value only exists if someone is willing to pay for "the value". Realistically speaking - the value is with very high probability 0 kr. per share. Someone will surely think otherwise and they are welcome to contribute and have their assessment included, on equal terms. We don't know the future and maybe something surprising and unforeseen will happen.·41 min sitten · MuokattuYou are right about that. My approach was probably a rookie mistake or a poor interpretation of the famous words "time in the market beats timing of the market". In hindsight, I probably should have sold instead of bought. But that's just how it is. You have to fall before you can rise. 😊 However, I still hope that they will come back. That would be nice for the portfolio 🙈
- ·3 t sitten · MuokattuThinking a bit outside the box this lovely Saturday Does Mark Abraham deliberately send SR Rumænien into restructuring to ensure the company doesn't get caught by the Danish bankruptcy and Teis? SR Rumænien is formally owned by the Danish company, which is why the value, if any, belongs to the estate or whatever it ends up being. But the move of Mark sending the company into restructuring I cannot fathom. What real business is there in Romania today and is it really just a chess move to ensure Teis doesn't have direct access to the company because Romanian law steps in and "secures" the company? It's otherwise an interesting headline from Børsen.dk today. Unfortunately, I cannot read the content myself, but I would not be surprised if revenue has been pumped and manipulated by Mark, who I assume was CEO at the time of recognizing an uncertain lawsuit.·2 t sittenFrom Mark:·2 t sittenWelcome back BQRS Your non-communication is a bit odd. Have you gotten a handle on the Danish bankruptcy law?
- 5 t sitten5 t sitten“Shape Robotics Romania Has Entered Reconstruction Proceedings. The Battlefield Has Just Doubled In Size.” https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-69-romania-enters-the?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios·2 t sittenYes. If it is rejected, then we will have a deduction for the loss at some point. A claim of 550 million against the company is also a significant part.·1 t sittenKloun Thanks for the choice of words for "The illegal bankruptcy". In round figures, there is approx. 250 mio. kr to Mark's girlfriend, nephew (or similar) and the father In addition, a small 200 mo. kr. from the Romanian bank that "financed" the company's receivables. That leaves 100 mio kr for all sorts of other things, including Danske Bank, Eifo, the state etc. It is probably only the approx. 250 mio. which are a direct consequence of the bankruptcy The 200 mio. kr. could potentially have been mortgaged with fictitious figures, now that we also hear Børsen.dk mention, what I also said in November, that revenue and debtors resembled something that could well be inflated/fictitious. Therefore, it cannot unequivocally be said that it arose as a result of the bankruptcy.
- ·1 päivä sittenHaven't followed much, so I apologize if this has been answered. What is Andre Fehrn's role in this? Shouldn't he, as Chairman of the Board, have seen it coming? Especially since as a former CEO he should know the company in detail.·6 t sitten · MuokattuI think the entire board of directors must know what has transpired, and what condition the company was/is in based on the financial statements. There is also the possibility that they are keeping a low profile for various reasons. There is quite a bit of boasting about the company's previous turnaround, so where is the money now when bills were not paid.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
133 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 37 min sitten · Muokattu37 min sitten · MuokattuSaw an article on Borsen https://substack.com/@wildceo/note/c-259966822?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
- ·1 t sittenHello all readers. I am a small investor, still at the beginner stage. I have been following along from the sidelines and have read quite a bit back and forth between some different daily co-investors in here. (Maybe you should take a breather from each other, smiles) I have a question that perhaps is a bit obvious. But should it now happen that shape gets back on track, will the assets we have then become worth something again, or are they already lost and merely awaiting a final decision to be written off as a loss? Thanks in advance and if my question seems weird or silly, then I apologize But as written, beginner stage. 😊·1 t sittenWelcome. Yes, the tone can get a bit shrill. It has been seen before in other cases where an investment has gone off track. If the company gets back on track, will the shares then be worth something? Well, maybe. Values are a funny thing, after all. A value only exists if someone is willing to pay for "the value". Realistically speaking - the value is with very high probability 0 kr. per share. Someone will surely think otherwise and they are welcome to contribute and have their assessment included, on equal terms. We don't know the future and maybe something surprising and unforeseen will happen.·41 min sitten · MuokattuYou are right about that. My approach was probably a rookie mistake or a poor interpretation of the famous words "time in the market beats timing of the market". In hindsight, I probably should have sold instead of bought. But that's just how it is. You have to fall before you can rise. 😊 However, I still hope that they will come back. That would be nice for the portfolio 🙈
- ·3 t sitten · MuokattuThinking a bit outside the box this lovely Saturday Does Mark Abraham deliberately send SR Rumænien into restructuring to ensure the company doesn't get caught by the Danish bankruptcy and Teis? SR Rumænien is formally owned by the Danish company, which is why the value, if any, belongs to the estate or whatever it ends up being. But the move of Mark sending the company into restructuring I cannot fathom. What real business is there in Romania today and is it really just a chess move to ensure Teis doesn't have direct access to the company because Romanian law steps in and "secures" the company? It's otherwise an interesting headline from Børsen.dk today. Unfortunately, I cannot read the content myself, but I would not be surprised if revenue has been pumped and manipulated by Mark, who I assume was CEO at the time of recognizing an uncertain lawsuit.·2 t sittenFrom Mark:·2 t sittenWelcome back BQRS Your non-communication is a bit odd. Have you gotten a handle on the Danish bankruptcy law?
- 5 t sitten5 t sitten“Shape Robotics Romania Has Entered Reconstruction Proceedings. The Battlefield Has Just Doubled In Size.” https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-69-romania-enters-the?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios·2 t sittenYes. If it is rejected, then we will have a deduction for the loss at some point. A claim of 550 million against the company is also a significant part.·1 t sittenKloun Thanks for the choice of words for "The illegal bankruptcy". In round figures, there is approx. 250 mio. kr to Mark's girlfriend, nephew (or similar) and the father In addition, a small 200 mo. kr. from the Romanian bank that "financed" the company's receivables. That leaves 100 mio kr for all sorts of other things, including Danske Bank, Eifo, the state etc. It is probably only the approx. 250 mio. which are a direct consequence of the bankruptcy The 200 mio. kr. could potentially have been mortgaged with fictitious figures, now that we also hear Børsen.dk mention, what I also said in November, that revenue and debtors resembled something that could well be inflated/fictitious. Therefore, it cannot unequivocally be said that it arose as a result of the bankruptcy.
- ·1 päivä sittenHaven't followed much, so I apologize if this has been answered. What is Andre Fehrn's role in this? Shouldn't he, as Chairman of the Board, have seen it coming? Especially since as a former CEO he should know the company in detail.·6 t sitten · MuokattuI think the entire board of directors must know what has transpired, and what condition the company was/is in based on the financial statements. There is also the possibility that they are keeping a low profile for various reasons. There is quite a bit of boasting about the company's previous turnaround, so where is the money now when bills were not paid.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt