2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
128 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·2 t sittenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwTg80akmY4 New live video from Mark·1 t sittenMark said today in the live stream that Teis claimed in court in Denmark that the promissory note claim is not valid. But that doesn't really add up, because Teis has known about that claim from Romania since January 26. He had plenty of time and a clear duty to dispute it over there, he just didn't. Therefore, the claim is now finally registered in Romania and can no longer be challenged. By attacking the claim here in Denmark, Teis just shows himself that he has not done his job as a trustee. The claim's origin is in Romania with a Danish guarantee, so we can pursue it in both countries. He thus allowed a claim, which he now calls invalid, to become fully valid in Romania.
8 t sitten8 t sittenny substack: According to information we have received, the High Court is expected to rule on the forced liquidation this week. We expect Teis to be removed as liquidator — which would render today's bankruptcy ruling, and his opposition to reconstruction, null and void. It is also worth noting that today's decision-making process in court included an analysis of articles from Børsen. :) That said, I must again emphasise that we will not comment on the decision itself. A strong appeal is coming, and our arguments are solid. Unfortunately, the judge did not appear to understand how a promissory note operates — but we will respectfully address that on the record.·41 min sitten · MuokattuProgression You mean, the promissory note which he apparently allowed to become fully valid in Romania? Which he now in court in Denmark said was not valid? It seems he has known about it since January 26. But didn't quite take the time to dispute it. So now it is finally registered in Romania and can no longer be challenged there. I think it's strange if he now stands and contradicts himself. And even in court. Makes one think... Did he really do his proper duty as a trustee. Or if he perhaps was so busy covering his own ass, that he has now committed a catastrophic error? We'll have to find that out.- ·8 t sittenHow does that affect Mark's demand against Nasdaq and Nasdaq's upholding of the suspension, despite Mark's demand to have trading resumed? Does that put Mark in a better position?
- 11 t sitten11 t sittenFra Marks substack: Rekonstruktion failed at the first court. We prepare for appeal. As usual we wait patiently for the appeal. The reason, as I understand it was that the promissory note was signed only by Andre and not by me and Andre. Of course this is not correct, and we shall put the promissory note in enforcement through Bruxelles I bis. Denmark is the only EU country that has opted out from EEO (European Enforcement Order). So it will take some time… but enough for an appeal.·8 t sittenThey have 2-4 weeks to appeal. Which will most likely happen. So we'll have to see what is considered wrong with the assessment of the promissory note. And whether Teis is chosen as trustee again and again.·7 t sittenThat could very well be, yes. We'll have to see who becomes the trustee in the bankruptcy. Mark writes that: "According to information we have received, the Supreme Court is expected to make a decision on the compulsory dissolution this week. We expect Teis to be removed as liquidator" So we must follow what happens this week in relation to a new potential trustee or if Teis tries to sneak back in. He will probably fight hard to ensure that the case is dealt with before too long.
- ·11 t sittenShape Robotics goes bankrupt for the second time - Finance https://share.google/yZvJQsJw3UU1I3XLz
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
128 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwTg80akmY4 New live video from Mark·1 t sittenMark said today in the live stream that Teis claimed in court in Denmark that the promissory note claim is not valid. But that doesn't really add up, because Teis has known about that claim from Romania since January 26. He had plenty of time and a clear duty to dispute it over there, he just didn't. Therefore, the claim is now finally registered in Romania and can no longer be challenged. By attacking the claim here in Denmark, Teis just shows himself that he has not done his job as a trustee. The claim's origin is in Romania with a Danish guarantee, so we can pursue it in both countries. He thus allowed a claim, which he now calls invalid, to become fully valid in Romania.
- 8 t sitten8 t sittenny substack: According to information we have received, the High Court is expected to rule on the forced liquidation this week. We expect Teis to be removed as liquidator — which would render today's bankruptcy ruling, and his opposition to reconstruction, null and void. It is also worth noting that today's decision-making process in court included an analysis of articles from Børsen. :) That said, I must again emphasise that we will not comment on the decision itself. A strong appeal is coming, and our arguments are solid. Unfortunately, the judge did not appear to understand how a promissory note operates — but we will respectfully address that on the record.·41 min sitten · MuokattuProgression You mean, the promissory note which he apparently allowed to become fully valid in Romania? Which he now in court in Denmark said was not valid? It seems he has known about it since January 26. But didn't quite take the time to dispute it. So now it is finally registered in Romania and can no longer be challenged there. I think it's strange if he now stands and contradicts himself. And even in court. Makes one think... Did he really do his proper duty as a trustee. Or if he perhaps was so busy covering his own ass, that he has now committed a catastrophic error? We'll have to find that out.
- ·8 t sittenHow does that affect Mark's demand against Nasdaq and Nasdaq's upholding of the suspension, despite Mark's demand to have trading resumed? Does that put Mark in a better position?
- 11 t sitten11 t sittenFra Marks substack: Rekonstruktion failed at the first court. We prepare for appeal. As usual we wait patiently for the appeal. The reason, as I understand it was that the promissory note was signed only by Andre and not by me and Andre. Of course this is not correct, and we shall put the promissory note in enforcement through Bruxelles I bis. Denmark is the only EU country that has opted out from EEO (European Enforcement Order). So it will take some time… but enough for an appeal.·8 t sittenThey have 2-4 weeks to appeal. Which will most likely happen. So we'll have to see what is considered wrong with the assessment of the promissory note. And whether Teis is chosen as trustee again and again.·7 t sittenThat could very well be, yes. We'll have to see who becomes the trustee in the bankruptcy. Mark writes that: "According to information we have received, the Supreme Court is expected to make a decision on the compulsory dissolution this week. We expect Teis to be removed as liquidator" So we must follow what happens this week in relation to a new potential trustee or if Teis tries to sneak back in. He will probably fight hard to ensure that the case is dealt with before too long.
- ·11 t sittenShape Robotics goes bankrupt for the second time - Finance https://share.google/yZvJQsJw3UU1I3XLz
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
128 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwTg80akmY4 New live video from Mark·1 t sittenMark said today in the live stream that Teis claimed in court in Denmark that the promissory note claim is not valid. But that doesn't really add up, because Teis has known about that claim from Romania since January 26. He had plenty of time and a clear duty to dispute it over there, he just didn't. Therefore, the claim is now finally registered in Romania and can no longer be challenged. By attacking the claim here in Denmark, Teis just shows himself that he has not done his job as a trustee. The claim's origin is in Romania with a Danish guarantee, so we can pursue it in both countries. He thus allowed a claim, which he now calls invalid, to become fully valid in Romania.
- 8 t sitten8 t sittenny substack: According to information we have received, the High Court is expected to rule on the forced liquidation this week. We expect Teis to be removed as liquidator — which would render today's bankruptcy ruling, and his opposition to reconstruction, null and void. It is also worth noting that today's decision-making process in court included an analysis of articles from Børsen. :) That said, I must again emphasise that we will not comment on the decision itself. A strong appeal is coming, and our arguments are solid. Unfortunately, the judge did not appear to understand how a promissory note operates — but we will respectfully address that on the record.·41 min sitten · MuokattuProgression You mean, the promissory note which he apparently allowed to become fully valid in Romania? Which he now in court in Denmark said was not valid? It seems he has known about it since January 26. But didn't quite take the time to dispute it. So now it is finally registered in Romania and can no longer be challenged there. I think it's strange if he now stands and contradicts himself. And even in court. Makes one think... Did he really do his proper duty as a trustee. Or if he perhaps was so busy covering his own ass, that he has now committed a catastrophic error? We'll have to find that out.
- ·8 t sittenHow does that affect Mark's demand against Nasdaq and Nasdaq's upholding of the suspension, despite Mark's demand to have trading resumed? Does that put Mark in a better position?
- 11 t sitten11 t sittenFra Marks substack: Rekonstruktion failed at the first court. We prepare for appeal. As usual we wait patiently for the appeal. The reason, as I understand it was that the promissory note was signed only by Andre and not by me and Andre. Of course this is not correct, and we shall put the promissory note in enforcement through Bruxelles I bis. Denmark is the only EU country that has opted out from EEO (European Enforcement Order). So it will take some time… but enough for an appeal.·8 t sittenThey have 2-4 weeks to appeal. Which will most likely happen. So we'll have to see what is considered wrong with the assessment of the promissory note. And whether Teis is chosen as trustee again and again.·7 t sittenThat could very well be, yes. We'll have to see who becomes the trustee in the bankruptcy. Mark writes that: "According to information we have received, the Supreme Court is expected to make a decision on the compulsory dissolution this week. We expect Teis to be removed as liquidator" So we must follow what happens this week in relation to a new potential trustee or if Teis tries to sneak back in. He will probably fight hard to ensure that the case is dealt with before too long.
- ·11 t sittenShape Robotics goes bankrupt for the second time - Finance https://share.google/yZvJQsJw3UU1I3XLz
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt