2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
78 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·3 t sittenToday's straw man Mark finds reason to compare Teis' (the KR lawyer) work in 2 cases, which Mark finds are "similar" SBS versus SR Let me briefly explain significant differences that Mark has not noticed on the fly SBS A controlled liquidation, where the company formally, after a vote among the ownership, winds itself up by realizing assets, paying creditors, and distributing dividends to shareholders. Creditors are paid and the rest is paid out to the shareholders. Teis is thus the "liquidator" and the company continues operations until the company is dissolved. The MAR rules are followed and the market is informed of significant matters. The "nice" way a company is shut down. SR The company enters bankruptcy, after a bankruptcy decree issued by the city court, because Mark has not paid the creditors. Thus, neither controlled nor determined by the shareholders. Operations cease immediately if the trustee does not find reason to continue operations. Teis acts as "trustee" and follows the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, which overrides MAR. The trustee must not pay bills with creditors' money and therefore the trustee does nothing in relation to MAR if it disadvantages the creditors. Mark naturally does not highlight the difference, as it would undermine Mark's narrative. Remember to be critical out there and listen to multiple sources and not just the one that tells you the story you want to hear. Happy Sunday and enjoy the beautiful spring weather
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuDaily Brief from CEO https://open.substack.com/pub/mevk827/p/game-over-day-11-two-zero-the-courts?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios Absolutely positive for SR, CEO and us shareholders, it is hard to remain pessimistic Have a good weekend.
·1 päivä sittenWell, it sounds pretty good, but it's written by Mark who is the/ one of those who led us here. Therefore, I still remain as before, as if the baby is dead. And I didn't think the company was allowed to continue, but Mark writes that it does.·3 t sitten · MuokattuKloun I'll gladly keep it short. "Documents" probably also cover who internally at SR decided to keep Eifos' credit termination secret from the market and you as a shareholder, for almost 2 years. Have a good Sunday- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuGood news, perhaps except for Progression who are probably smarter than the court, I look forward to hearing comments from that side. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/markrabraham_shaperobotics-ruleoflaw-denmark-share-7440728404334804992-7SYb?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAAARpbicBIXyImFWucwSyMHp6NHVIcTURcQs Here excerpted and translated into Danish with google translate “Denmark is a rule of law country. Today it proved it again. Today, the Maritime and Commercial Court — in the reopening ordered by the High Court of Eastern Denmark — has given Shape Robotics a deadline of 5 months for proper service of process. Exactly what the law requires. Exactly what we asked for. This is not a technicality. This is the rule of law in practice . On March 5, 2026, three judges in the High Court of Eastern Denmark unanimously annulled the bankruptcy judgment and sent the case back to the Maritime and Commercial Court for renewed processing. Why? Because the original bankruptcy petition was never legally served on Shape Robotics. Today, at this reopening, the Maritime and Commercial Court did what the law requires: it gave 5 months for proper and legal service of the bankruptcy petition — in full compliance with the Danish Administration of Justice Act and EU Regulation 2020/1784. Shape Robotics must now get its assets and documents back from Teis Gullitz-Wormslev and Kromann Reumert. The former trustee had 3.7 million DKK in company funds, operating records, and subsidiary documentation for 59 days — without issuing any market information. The Supreme Court annulled the bankruptcy. The property must be returned. Now we focus on what matters most: restarting trading, consolidating the company, and working to recover from the mess Teis and Kromann have created. This is our priority — to get Shape Robotics back to full operational strength, restore shareholder value, and rebuild what was unlawfully disrupted. Today's decision by the Maritime and Commercial Court is a big step forward in our mission to bring Shape Robotics back on track. The courts are working. The institutions are holding up. The rule of law is alive and well in Denmark. We are getting stronger day by day. 💪 #ShapeRobotics #RuleOfLaw #Denmark #CorporateGovernance #Justice #ShareholderRights #DanishLaw #Bankruptcy #Courts”
·2 päivää sittenSurely they'll soon have gotten their act together and get trading opened. Or get it closed completely. It can't be that difficult, can it, with all the highly paid people.·11 min sittenAs written, it's a complicated story. After all, I don't believe that Mark is just making something up here with iris. I agree with you that the money must be in the account first. The liquidator must ensure that the missing vouchers and documents are handed over, so we can proceed with either continuation or total bankruptcy.- 2 päivää sitten2 päivää sitten·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuGood morning Kloun Interesting Mark, we would like to declare the agreement with Danske Bank invalid. Danske Bank believes the agreement is valid, otherwise Mark would surely have presented documentation that the bank had revoked the agreement together with Mark? Here's what I immediately notice; - Mark confirms the agreement with his signature on Nov 28, 2025 - Mark confirms the agreement by issuing a company announcement about the agreement, Dec 2025. - Mark finds money in Romania and pays the first installment, Dec, 2025. - Mark now refers to "contra proferentem" which is only used if it is a valid agreement "with unclear terms", March 2026. Do you also assess that Mark is contradicting his own actions?·1 päivä sittenKloun I am simply answering you at eye level. Don't bring up my knowledge as a topic if you can't handle a counter-response.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
78 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 t sittenToday's straw man Mark finds reason to compare Teis' (the KR lawyer) work in 2 cases, which Mark finds are "similar" SBS versus SR Let me briefly explain significant differences that Mark has not noticed on the fly SBS A controlled liquidation, where the company formally, after a vote among the ownership, winds itself up by realizing assets, paying creditors, and distributing dividends to shareholders. Creditors are paid and the rest is paid out to the shareholders. Teis is thus the "liquidator" and the company continues operations until the company is dissolved. The MAR rules are followed and the market is informed of significant matters. The "nice" way a company is shut down. SR The company enters bankruptcy, after a bankruptcy decree issued by the city court, because Mark has not paid the creditors. Thus, neither controlled nor determined by the shareholders. Operations cease immediately if the trustee does not find reason to continue operations. Teis acts as "trustee" and follows the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, which overrides MAR. The trustee must not pay bills with creditors' money and therefore the trustee does nothing in relation to MAR if it disadvantages the creditors. Mark naturally does not highlight the difference, as it would undermine Mark's narrative. Remember to be critical out there and listen to multiple sources and not just the one that tells you the story you want to hear. Happy Sunday and enjoy the beautiful spring weather
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuDaily Brief from CEO https://open.substack.com/pub/mevk827/p/game-over-day-11-two-zero-the-courts?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios Absolutely positive for SR, CEO and us shareholders, it is hard to remain pessimistic Have a good weekend.·1 päivä sittenWell, it sounds pretty good, but it's written by Mark who is the/ one of those who led us here. Therefore, I still remain as before, as if the baby is dead. And I didn't think the company was allowed to continue, but Mark writes that it does.·3 t sitten · MuokattuKloun I'll gladly keep it short. "Documents" probably also cover who internally at SR decided to keep Eifos' credit termination secret from the market and you as a shareholder, for almost 2 years. Have a good Sunday
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuGood news, perhaps except for Progression who are probably smarter than the court, I look forward to hearing comments from that side. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/markrabraham_shaperobotics-ruleoflaw-denmark-share-7440728404334804992-7SYb?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAAARpbicBIXyImFWucwSyMHp6NHVIcTURcQs Here excerpted and translated into Danish with google translate “Denmark is a rule of law country. Today it proved it again. Today, the Maritime and Commercial Court — in the reopening ordered by the High Court of Eastern Denmark — has given Shape Robotics a deadline of 5 months for proper service of process. Exactly what the law requires. Exactly what we asked for. This is not a technicality. This is the rule of law in practice . On March 5, 2026, three judges in the High Court of Eastern Denmark unanimously annulled the bankruptcy judgment and sent the case back to the Maritime and Commercial Court for renewed processing. Why? Because the original bankruptcy petition was never legally served on Shape Robotics. Today, at this reopening, the Maritime and Commercial Court did what the law requires: it gave 5 months for proper and legal service of the bankruptcy petition — in full compliance with the Danish Administration of Justice Act and EU Regulation 2020/1784. Shape Robotics must now get its assets and documents back from Teis Gullitz-Wormslev and Kromann Reumert. The former trustee had 3.7 million DKK in company funds, operating records, and subsidiary documentation for 59 days — without issuing any market information. The Supreme Court annulled the bankruptcy. The property must be returned. Now we focus on what matters most: restarting trading, consolidating the company, and working to recover from the mess Teis and Kromann have created. This is our priority — to get Shape Robotics back to full operational strength, restore shareholder value, and rebuild what was unlawfully disrupted. Today's decision by the Maritime and Commercial Court is a big step forward in our mission to bring Shape Robotics back on track. The courts are working. The institutions are holding up. The rule of law is alive and well in Denmark. We are getting stronger day by day. 💪 #ShapeRobotics #RuleOfLaw #Denmark #CorporateGovernance #Justice #ShareholderRights #DanishLaw #Bankruptcy #Courts”
- ·2 päivää sittenSurely they'll soon have gotten their act together and get trading opened. Or get it closed completely. It can't be that difficult, can it, with all the highly paid people.·11 min sittenAs written, it's a complicated story. After all, I don't believe that Mark is just making something up here with iris. I agree with you that the money must be in the account first. The liquidator must ensure that the missing vouchers and documents are handed over, so we can proceed with either continuation or total bankruptcy.
- 2 päivää sitten2 päivää sitten·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuGood morning Kloun Interesting Mark, we would like to declare the agreement with Danske Bank invalid. Danske Bank believes the agreement is valid, otherwise Mark would surely have presented documentation that the bank had revoked the agreement together with Mark? Here's what I immediately notice; - Mark confirms the agreement with his signature on Nov 28, 2025 - Mark confirms the agreement by issuing a company announcement about the agreement, Dec 2025. - Mark finds money in Romania and pays the first installment, Dec, 2025. - Mark now refers to "contra proferentem" which is only used if it is a valid agreement "with unclear terms", March 2026. Do you also assess that Mark is contradicting his own actions?·1 päivä sittenKloun I am simply answering you at eye level. Don't bring up my knowledge as a topic if you can't handle a counter-response.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
78 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 t sittenToday's straw man Mark finds reason to compare Teis' (the KR lawyer) work in 2 cases, which Mark finds are "similar" SBS versus SR Let me briefly explain significant differences that Mark has not noticed on the fly SBS A controlled liquidation, where the company formally, after a vote among the ownership, winds itself up by realizing assets, paying creditors, and distributing dividends to shareholders. Creditors are paid and the rest is paid out to the shareholders. Teis is thus the "liquidator" and the company continues operations until the company is dissolved. The MAR rules are followed and the market is informed of significant matters. The "nice" way a company is shut down. SR The company enters bankruptcy, after a bankruptcy decree issued by the city court, because Mark has not paid the creditors. Thus, neither controlled nor determined by the shareholders. Operations cease immediately if the trustee does not find reason to continue operations. Teis acts as "trustee" and follows the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, which overrides MAR. The trustee must not pay bills with creditors' money and therefore the trustee does nothing in relation to MAR if it disadvantages the creditors. Mark naturally does not highlight the difference, as it would undermine Mark's narrative. Remember to be critical out there and listen to multiple sources and not just the one that tells you the story you want to hear. Happy Sunday and enjoy the beautiful spring weather
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuDaily Brief from CEO https://open.substack.com/pub/mevk827/p/game-over-day-11-two-zero-the-courts?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios Absolutely positive for SR, CEO and us shareholders, it is hard to remain pessimistic Have a good weekend.·1 päivä sittenWell, it sounds pretty good, but it's written by Mark who is the/ one of those who led us here. Therefore, I still remain as before, as if the baby is dead. And I didn't think the company was allowed to continue, but Mark writes that it does.·3 t sitten · MuokattuKloun I'll gladly keep it short. "Documents" probably also cover who internally at SR decided to keep Eifos' credit termination secret from the market and you as a shareholder, for almost 2 years. Have a good Sunday
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuGood news, perhaps except for Progression who are probably smarter than the court, I look forward to hearing comments from that side. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/markrabraham_shaperobotics-ruleoflaw-denmark-share-7440728404334804992-7SYb?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAAARpbicBIXyImFWucwSyMHp6NHVIcTURcQs Here excerpted and translated into Danish with google translate “Denmark is a rule of law country. Today it proved it again. Today, the Maritime and Commercial Court — in the reopening ordered by the High Court of Eastern Denmark — has given Shape Robotics a deadline of 5 months for proper service of process. Exactly what the law requires. Exactly what we asked for. This is not a technicality. This is the rule of law in practice . On March 5, 2026, three judges in the High Court of Eastern Denmark unanimously annulled the bankruptcy judgment and sent the case back to the Maritime and Commercial Court for renewed processing. Why? Because the original bankruptcy petition was never legally served on Shape Robotics. Today, at this reopening, the Maritime and Commercial Court did what the law requires: it gave 5 months for proper and legal service of the bankruptcy petition — in full compliance with the Danish Administration of Justice Act and EU Regulation 2020/1784. Shape Robotics must now get its assets and documents back from Teis Gullitz-Wormslev and Kromann Reumert. The former trustee had 3.7 million DKK in company funds, operating records, and subsidiary documentation for 59 days — without issuing any market information. The Supreme Court annulled the bankruptcy. The property must be returned. Now we focus on what matters most: restarting trading, consolidating the company, and working to recover from the mess Teis and Kromann have created. This is our priority — to get Shape Robotics back to full operational strength, restore shareholder value, and rebuild what was unlawfully disrupted. Today's decision by the Maritime and Commercial Court is a big step forward in our mission to bring Shape Robotics back on track. The courts are working. The institutions are holding up. The rule of law is alive and well in Denmark. We are getting stronger day by day. 💪 #ShapeRobotics #RuleOfLaw #Denmark #CorporateGovernance #Justice #ShareholderRights #DanishLaw #Bankruptcy #Courts”
- ·2 päivää sittenSurely they'll soon have gotten their act together and get trading opened. Or get it closed completely. It can't be that difficult, can it, with all the highly paid people.·11 min sittenAs written, it's a complicated story. After all, I don't believe that Mark is just making something up here with iris. I agree with you that the money must be in the account first. The liquidator must ensure that the missing vouchers and documents are handed over, so we can proceed with either continuation or total bankruptcy.
- 2 päivää sitten2 päivää sitten·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuGood morning Kloun Interesting Mark, we would like to declare the agreement with Danske Bank invalid. Danske Bank believes the agreement is valid, otherwise Mark would surely have presented documentation that the bank had revoked the agreement together with Mark? Here's what I immediately notice; - Mark confirms the agreement with his signature on Nov 28, 2025 - Mark confirms the agreement by issuing a company announcement about the agreement, Dec 2025. - Mark finds money in Romania and pays the first installment, Dec, 2025. - Mark now refers to "contra proferentem" which is only used if it is a valid agreement "with unclear terms", March 2026. Do you also assess that Mark is contradicting his own actions?·1 päivä sittenKloun I am simply answering you at eye level. Don't bring up my knowledge as a topic if you can't handle a counter-response.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt