2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
126 päivää sitten18 min
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 10.9.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 29.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 10.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 25.11.2024 | |
| 2024 Q2 -tulosraportti | 22.8.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·20 min sitten · MuokattuFrom Børsen.dk "Mystery surrounding Shape Robotics chairman's large share purchase: Securities register cannot find the trades" Yes, in early December it was written that one could not take the communication from SR/Mark into account regarding share purchases and loans from the chairman. Subsequently, there was a possible external capital agreement, which almost only lacked a signature, and that SR was looking for a new large international auditor, after the previous auditor had slammed the door, which one had to endure. I wonder if Mark comments on the chairman's missing transaction on LinkedIn? Did SR even get a loan from the chairman? Did SR have a real conversation with a new auditor? How far was SR in negotiations with IRIS? The risk of 3 x no was highlighted despite fervent criticism from the SR loyalists. All these questions I highlighted in the critical days in early December and around the auditor's departure on Dec. 18th, which was exactly 14 days after the suspicious company announcements. The 14 days that the auditor legally must give management to rectify, before the hammer falls. Mark naturally did not comply, but started a war instead. The skeletons are coming out of the closet, as promised.
·5 t sittenShouldn't the bankruptcy have been withdrawn by now. Some days ago Mark wrote, it was 97-98% certain! Things take time.
·4 t sittenEh, I've already accepted that my money is gone. If it then gets reversed and I can get something back, I'll see it as a bonus, but I'm not counting on anything, so I can't be disappointed either😅
1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenhahhaaha taskan munaa saatana
·1 päivä sittenThis has somehow become a discussion about whether one likes the former CEO of SR or not, I think it's a mistake and won't yield anything going forward. What I regret most is that as a shareholder, I am not allowed to see/hear/participate in the EGF. But it had to end in bankruptcy because the former CEO did not behave as a Danish CEO would have done, namely give up and sneak out the back door and go underground. So, with the combined help of the former CEO, someone with a user on Nordnet, Finans, and surely others, to thwart any possibilities there might be for a reconstruction, I find that regrettable for me as an SR shareholder.
·4 t sittenIt has gone wrong because Ceo has not ensured that the bills are paid. Creditors do not file for bankruptcy if they get their money, or there are realistic agreements about it.
·1 päivä sittenRegardless of what frustrated Shape owners think about it not being over, or that Mark might be right about pump & dump. It has no bearing on the fact that the company went bankrupt. At most, it might have meant that the company had to dilute itself more heavily than otherwise. The fact is that the company went bankrupt because. - The CEO apparently did not read and "could not open" an e-box from the bankruptcy court - The CEO & CFO leveraged themselves to the hilt with invoice financing, which is extremely risky. Instead of working with payment terms and creating a positive cash flow. - Curiously enough, the CEO only started telling all the exciting conspiracies after the company was about to go bankrupt; the transactions had not been reported until then. He has been in contact several times this year with, among others, the stock exchange, which pointed out risks for investors and the company's operations, and stated that things were going brilliantly and they were in the process of delivering on the plan and 1 billion - The board and management even chose not to secure operations by issuing a share issue, before the company's operations and survival were on the brink. - No other CEOs follow stock debate forums or write insider knowledge on LinkedIn. Something that has previously been pointed out and that their communication should go through the stock exchange. If you read his posts, he seems decidedly psychotic and with a mentality that "everyone is after him". But the man is CEO, and responsible for this. - The CEO withheld information from shareholders and the board about EIFO loans. - The CEO withdrew the quarterly report on the day, to hide the serious financial situation. - The CEO believes that the best way to handle critical analyses from the media is to sue them, instead of calmly proving them wrong? What other companies act like that in Denmark? I maintain that I have never read about a more psychotic and unsuitable CEO to run a company. He can think what he wants about Denmark, but he has apparently systematically misled company boards before and has been convicted (appealed).
8 t sitten8 t sittenI also had money in this and hope i get it back if some miracle happens - i assume it wont happen. I will say though, some of these things i read here make no sense to me. “Curiously enough, the CEO only started……” How exactly is that curious? The timeline is not that long - if you publish stuff like this as soon as you start noticing it, you will surely come off as a maniac - with no finished report or evidence. Obviously you build the case and publish it later when you can connect the dots. Im not picking any sides here, im simply saying that you are literally proving his point by spreading negative press about him - whats the gain from that anyways, taking the time to write this here? Really just looks like spreading negative press. I wont speak on the other points you had, since im not an expert, and dont have any immediate response to those facts you presented. Have a good day everyone :)7 t sitten7 t sittenWell, we are after the same thing then. How is speculating and assuming things as you doing - going to give anyone that.(again im only referring to the one statement) I mean if you want truthfulness and justice, you can simply let the law and the process run its course. Your argument that he is trying to shift focus… what does your post do? The same thing for the opposite part. Im all for him coming out as the bad guy if thats the truth, and i dont necessarily think that you are wrong at all. But dont you see how this is the wrong way to find the truth? You are basically using your voice to try and harm his credibility. I feel like as public outsiders, all we can do is stop slandering and just observe, unless you have very specific documented proof of what you say. Ask yourself, do you want truthfulness or do you want him to be the bad guy?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
126 päivää sitten18 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·20 min sitten · MuokattuFrom Børsen.dk "Mystery surrounding Shape Robotics chairman's large share purchase: Securities register cannot find the trades" Yes, in early December it was written that one could not take the communication from SR/Mark into account regarding share purchases and loans from the chairman. Subsequently, there was a possible external capital agreement, which almost only lacked a signature, and that SR was looking for a new large international auditor, after the previous auditor had slammed the door, which one had to endure. I wonder if Mark comments on the chairman's missing transaction on LinkedIn? Did SR even get a loan from the chairman? Did SR have a real conversation with a new auditor? How far was SR in negotiations with IRIS? The risk of 3 x no was highlighted despite fervent criticism from the SR loyalists. All these questions I highlighted in the critical days in early December and around the auditor's departure on Dec. 18th, which was exactly 14 days after the suspicious company announcements. The 14 days that the auditor legally must give management to rectify, before the hammer falls. Mark naturally did not comply, but started a war instead. The skeletons are coming out of the closet, as promised.
- ·5 t sittenShouldn't the bankruptcy have been withdrawn by now. Some days ago Mark wrote, it was 97-98% certain! Things take time.·4 t sittenEh, I've already accepted that my money is gone. If it then gets reversed and I can get something back, I'll see it as a bonus, but I'm not counting on anything, so I can't be disappointed either😅
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenhahhaaha taskan munaa saatana
- ·1 päivä sittenThis has somehow become a discussion about whether one likes the former CEO of SR or not, I think it's a mistake and won't yield anything going forward. What I regret most is that as a shareholder, I am not allowed to see/hear/participate in the EGF. But it had to end in bankruptcy because the former CEO did not behave as a Danish CEO would have done, namely give up and sneak out the back door and go underground. So, with the combined help of the former CEO, someone with a user on Nordnet, Finans, and surely others, to thwart any possibilities there might be for a reconstruction, I find that regrettable for me as an SR shareholder.·4 t sittenIt has gone wrong because Ceo has not ensured that the bills are paid. Creditors do not file for bankruptcy if they get their money, or there are realistic agreements about it.
- ·1 päivä sittenRegardless of what frustrated Shape owners think about it not being over, or that Mark might be right about pump & dump. It has no bearing on the fact that the company went bankrupt. At most, it might have meant that the company had to dilute itself more heavily than otherwise. The fact is that the company went bankrupt because. - The CEO apparently did not read and "could not open" an e-box from the bankruptcy court - The CEO & CFO leveraged themselves to the hilt with invoice financing, which is extremely risky. Instead of working with payment terms and creating a positive cash flow. - Curiously enough, the CEO only started telling all the exciting conspiracies after the company was about to go bankrupt; the transactions had not been reported until then. He has been in contact several times this year with, among others, the stock exchange, which pointed out risks for investors and the company's operations, and stated that things were going brilliantly and they were in the process of delivering on the plan and 1 billion - The board and management even chose not to secure operations by issuing a share issue, before the company's operations and survival were on the brink. - No other CEOs follow stock debate forums or write insider knowledge on LinkedIn. Something that has previously been pointed out and that their communication should go through the stock exchange. If you read his posts, he seems decidedly psychotic and with a mentality that "everyone is after him". But the man is CEO, and responsible for this. - The CEO withheld information from shareholders and the board about EIFO loans. - The CEO withdrew the quarterly report on the day, to hide the serious financial situation. - The CEO believes that the best way to handle critical analyses from the media is to sue them, instead of calmly proving them wrong? What other companies act like that in Denmark? I maintain that I have never read about a more psychotic and unsuitable CEO to run a company. He can think what he wants about Denmark, but he has apparently systematically misled company boards before and has been convicted (appealed).8 t sitten8 t sittenI also had money in this and hope i get it back if some miracle happens - i assume it wont happen. I will say though, some of these things i read here make no sense to me. “Curiously enough, the CEO only started……” How exactly is that curious? The timeline is not that long - if you publish stuff like this as soon as you start noticing it, you will surely come off as a maniac - with no finished report or evidence. Obviously you build the case and publish it later when you can connect the dots. Im not picking any sides here, im simply saying that you are literally proving his point by spreading negative press about him - whats the gain from that anyways, taking the time to write this here? Really just looks like spreading negative press. I wont speak on the other points you had, since im not an expert, and dont have any immediate response to those facts you presented. Have a good day everyone :)7 t sitten7 t sittenWell, we are after the same thing then. How is speculating and assuming things as you doing - going to give anyone that.(again im only referring to the one statement) I mean if you want truthfulness and justice, you can simply let the law and the process run its course. Your argument that he is trying to shift focus… what does your post do? The same thing for the opposite part. Im all for him coming out as the bad guy if thats the truth, and i dont necessarily think that you are wrong at all. But dont you see how this is the wrong way to find the truth? You are basically using your voice to try and harm his credibility. I feel like as public outsiders, all we can do is stop slandering and just observe, unless you have very specific documented proof of what you say. Ask yourself, do you want truthfulness or do you want him to be the bad guy?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 10.9.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 29.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 10.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 25.11.2024 | |
| 2024 Q2 -tulosraportti | 22.8.2024 |
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
126 päivää sitten18 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 10.9.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 29.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 10.4.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 25.11.2024 | |
| 2024 Q2 -tulosraportti | 22.8.2024 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·20 min sitten · MuokattuFrom Børsen.dk "Mystery surrounding Shape Robotics chairman's large share purchase: Securities register cannot find the trades" Yes, in early December it was written that one could not take the communication from SR/Mark into account regarding share purchases and loans from the chairman. Subsequently, there was a possible external capital agreement, which almost only lacked a signature, and that SR was looking for a new large international auditor, after the previous auditor had slammed the door, which one had to endure. I wonder if Mark comments on the chairman's missing transaction on LinkedIn? Did SR even get a loan from the chairman? Did SR have a real conversation with a new auditor? How far was SR in negotiations with IRIS? The risk of 3 x no was highlighted despite fervent criticism from the SR loyalists. All these questions I highlighted in the critical days in early December and around the auditor's departure on Dec. 18th, which was exactly 14 days after the suspicious company announcements. The 14 days that the auditor legally must give management to rectify, before the hammer falls. Mark naturally did not comply, but started a war instead. The skeletons are coming out of the closet, as promised.
- ·5 t sittenShouldn't the bankruptcy have been withdrawn by now. Some days ago Mark wrote, it was 97-98% certain! Things take time.·4 t sittenEh, I've already accepted that my money is gone. If it then gets reversed and I can get something back, I'll see it as a bonus, but I'm not counting on anything, so I can't be disappointed either😅
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenhahhaaha taskan munaa saatana
- ·1 päivä sittenThis has somehow become a discussion about whether one likes the former CEO of SR or not, I think it's a mistake and won't yield anything going forward. What I regret most is that as a shareholder, I am not allowed to see/hear/participate in the EGF. But it had to end in bankruptcy because the former CEO did not behave as a Danish CEO would have done, namely give up and sneak out the back door and go underground. So, with the combined help of the former CEO, someone with a user on Nordnet, Finans, and surely others, to thwart any possibilities there might be for a reconstruction, I find that regrettable for me as an SR shareholder.·4 t sittenIt has gone wrong because Ceo has not ensured that the bills are paid. Creditors do not file for bankruptcy if they get their money, or there are realistic agreements about it.
- ·1 päivä sittenRegardless of what frustrated Shape owners think about it not being over, or that Mark might be right about pump & dump. It has no bearing on the fact that the company went bankrupt. At most, it might have meant that the company had to dilute itself more heavily than otherwise. The fact is that the company went bankrupt because. - The CEO apparently did not read and "could not open" an e-box from the bankruptcy court - The CEO & CFO leveraged themselves to the hilt with invoice financing, which is extremely risky. Instead of working with payment terms and creating a positive cash flow. - Curiously enough, the CEO only started telling all the exciting conspiracies after the company was about to go bankrupt; the transactions had not been reported until then. He has been in contact several times this year with, among others, the stock exchange, which pointed out risks for investors and the company's operations, and stated that things were going brilliantly and they were in the process of delivering on the plan and 1 billion - The board and management even chose not to secure operations by issuing a share issue, before the company's operations and survival were on the brink. - No other CEOs follow stock debate forums or write insider knowledge on LinkedIn. Something that has previously been pointed out and that their communication should go through the stock exchange. If you read his posts, he seems decidedly psychotic and with a mentality that "everyone is after him". But the man is CEO, and responsible for this. - The CEO withheld information from shareholders and the board about EIFO loans. - The CEO withdrew the quarterly report on the day, to hide the serious financial situation. - The CEO believes that the best way to handle critical analyses from the media is to sue them, instead of calmly proving them wrong? What other companies act like that in Denmark? I maintain that I have never read about a more psychotic and unsuitable CEO to run a company. He can think what he wants about Denmark, but he has apparently systematically misled company boards before and has been convicted (appealed).8 t sitten8 t sittenI also had money in this and hope i get it back if some miracle happens - i assume it wont happen. I will say though, some of these things i read here make no sense to me. “Curiously enough, the CEO only started……” How exactly is that curious? The timeline is not that long - if you publish stuff like this as soon as you start noticing it, you will surely come off as a maniac - with no finished report or evidence. Obviously you build the case and publish it later when you can connect the dots. Im not picking any sides here, im simply saying that you are literally proving his point by spreading negative press about him - whats the gain from that anyways, taking the time to write this here? Really just looks like spreading negative press. I wont speak on the other points you had, since im not an expert, and dont have any immediate response to those facts you presented. Have a good day everyone :)7 t sitten7 t sittenWell, we are after the same thing then. How is speculating and assuming things as you doing - going to give anyone that.(again im only referring to the one statement) I mean if you want truthfulness and justice, you can simply let the law and the process run its course. Your argument that he is trying to shift focus… what does your post do? The same thing for the opposite part. Im all for him coming out as the bad guy if thats the truth, and i dont necessarily think that you are wrong at all. But dont you see how this is the wrong way to find the truth? You are basically using your voice to try and harm his credibility. I feel like as public outsiders, all we can do is stop slandering and just observe, unless you have very specific documented proof of what you say. Ask yourself, do you want truthfulness or do you want him to be the bad guy?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt