Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
200 päivää sitten

Tarjoustasot

DenmarkNasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
27.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
22.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
3.4.2025
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti
25.11.2024
2024 Q2 -tulosraportti
22.8.2024

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 15 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    15 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    The decision to keep Eifo's credit termination secret was apparently taken by the board over Mark's head - when Mark explains the story. Mark has said that it was fully disclosed for 2 years, but it was "fully disclosed" among the board and Mark, and deliberately kept secret from shareholders until December 2025. The explanation was supposed to be that MAR did not allow the company to share the information (!) Mark directly says that MAR prevented the sharing of the information. (Note: MAR is precisely meant to ensure the market is informed and MAR is not created to be management's excuse for keeping information secret from the market.....) Mark does not believe it was material information that the company had had a credit line terminated, which was crucial for the company's operations. Even though it was millimeters from sending the company into bankruptcy.....one wonders about Mark's assessment of material information and that characterizes Mark's entire behavior.
  • 18 t sitten
    ·
    18 t sitten
    ·
    Mark's new straw man - SR and Danske Bank never entered into a repayment agreement, because Danske Bank has not signed the agreement "correctly" via e-signature. Marks has confirmed that the agreement exists by, among other things, signing the agreement, issuing a PR about the agreement, and paying the 1st agreed installment. Danske Bank has confirmed the agreement exists by endorsing the agreement with multiple signatures, by withdrawing the bankruptcy petition, and by receiving the 1st agreed installment. This strongly indicates that the agreement exists and the agreement is valid and binding, when both parties with their behavior show that an agreement has been entered into. This is stronger than a possible missing signature or some mess with Nem-id validation. Have a good weekend out there, both to the SR-critical and the Mark-loyal investors.
  • 19 t sitten
    ·
    19 t sitten
    ·
    Here excerpted from the internet. “A lawyer or a law firm acts in violation of good legal practice..., if the lawyer or law firm enters into a collaboration with other companies on terms or under circumstances where reasonably founded doubt can be raised as to whether the collaboration is compatible with the mentioned requirements for observing confidentiality and maintaining independence and integrity.” Covers a specific decision from the High Court, And to Kromann & Company, hand over the documents that exist, considering the 59 days you had responsibility in relation to the shareholders of Shape Robotics.
    18 t sitten
    ·
    18 t sitten
    ·
    Is there anything objective in the lawyer's actions that indicates that the lawyer has acted contrary to good legal practice?
    15 t sitten
    ·
    15 t sitten
    ·
    Kloun You are not very keen on talking about the process of Eifo's credit termination and the fact that Mark has been involved, either on his own, or together with the board, in withholding information from the market. Do you perhaps owe full transparency and fail to explain why you consistently protect Mark?
  • 20 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    20 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Here is a link to Friday's CEO video event https://www.wildceo.live/p/game-over-day-4-kurator-from-the-future-kromann-reumert-shape-robotics?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web The CEO goes live 5 minutes into the video. The post itself starts with “Yesterday at four in the morning, a DocuSign reminder landed in my inbox. It was from Kromann Reumert, asking me to sign a document called the Afviklingsaftale — the settlement agreement between Shape Robotics, Danske Bank, and EIFO. The same document that was used in court to justify the bankruptcy. The same document under which EUR 568,700 was paid from Romanian bank accounts into Kromann Reumert’s client account.” There is also more info here under news
    18 t sitten
    ·
    18 t sitten
    ·
    What does Mark need a "riminder" for now, besides cultivating "Wooden language" as always? Mark can simply read the press release that Mark himself issues on December 2, 2025 with the headline "Shape Robotics: Update on EIFO support withdrawal, bank facilities, and restructuring measures", where SR, Danske Bank and Eifo confirm they have entered into an agreement. In early December 2025, the agreement saved SR/Mark = it was a good agreement. March 2026, the same agreement is now taking the life out of SR/Mark = it is now a bad agreement. Mark turns 180 degrees and struggles in the net.
    13 t sitten
    ·
    13 t sitten
    ·
    Same same in my opinion.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    From borsen.dk no access Shape Robotics had its bankruptcy lifted last Friday, and a French investment company is now ready with a lifeline. However, there is a significant condition that currently blocks
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
200 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 15 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    15 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    The decision to keep Eifo's credit termination secret was apparently taken by the board over Mark's head - when Mark explains the story. Mark has said that it was fully disclosed for 2 years, but it was "fully disclosed" among the board and Mark, and deliberately kept secret from shareholders until December 2025. The explanation was supposed to be that MAR did not allow the company to share the information (!) Mark directly says that MAR prevented the sharing of the information. (Note: MAR is precisely meant to ensure the market is informed and MAR is not created to be management's excuse for keeping information secret from the market.....) Mark does not believe it was material information that the company had had a credit line terminated, which was crucial for the company's operations. Even though it was millimeters from sending the company into bankruptcy.....one wonders about Mark's assessment of material information and that characterizes Mark's entire behavior.
  • 18 t sitten
    ·
    18 t sitten
    ·
    Mark's new straw man - SR and Danske Bank never entered into a repayment agreement, because Danske Bank has not signed the agreement "correctly" via e-signature. Marks has confirmed that the agreement exists by, among other things, signing the agreement, issuing a PR about the agreement, and paying the 1st agreed installment. Danske Bank has confirmed the agreement exists by endorsing the agreement with multiple signatures, by withdrawing the bankruptcy petition, and by receiving the 1st agreed installment. This strongly indicates that the agreement exists and the agreement is valid and binding, when both parties with their behavior show that an agreement has been entered into. This is stronger than a possible missing signature or some mess with Nem-id validation. Have a good weekend out there, both to the SR-critical and the Mark-loyal investors.
  • 19 t sitten
    ·
    19 t sitten
    ·
    Here excerpted from the internet. “A lawyer or a law firm acts in violation of good legal practice..., if the lawyer or law firm enters into a collaboration with other companies on terms or under circumstances where reasonably founded doubt can be raised as to whether the collaboration is compatible with the mentioned requirements for observing confidentiality and maintaining independence and integrity.” Covers a specific decision from the High Court, And to Kromann & Company, hand over the documents that exist, considering the 59 days you had responsibility in relation to the shareholders of Shape Robotics.
    18 t sitten
    ·
    18 t sitten
    ·
    Is there anything objective in the lawyer's actions that indicates that the lawyer has acted contrary to good legal practice?
    15 t sitten
    ·
    15 t sitten
    ·
    Kloun You are not very keen on talking about the process of Eifo's credit termination and the fact that Mark has been involved, either on his own, or together with the board, in withholding information from the market. Do you perhaps owe full transparency and fail to explain why you consistently protect Mark?
  • 20 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    20 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Here is a link to Friday's CEO video event https://www.wildceo.live/p/game-over-day-4-kurator-from-the-future-kromann-reumert-shape-robotics?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web The CEO goes live 5 minutes into the video. The post itself starts with “Yesterday at four in the morning, a DocuSign reminder landed in my inbox. It was from Kromann Reumert, asking me to sign a document called the Afviklingsaftale — the settlement agreement between Shape Robotics, Danske Bank, and EIFO. The same document that was used in court to justify the bankruptcy. The same document under which EUR 568,700 was paid from Romanian bank accounts into Kromann Reumert’s client account.” There is also more info here under news
    18 t sitten
    ·
    18 t sitten
    ·
    What does Mark need a "riminder" for now, besides cultivating "Wooden language" as always? Mark can simply read the press release that Mark himself issues on December 2, 2025 with the headline "Shape Robotics: Update on EIFO support withdrawal, bank facilities, and restructuring measures", where SR, Danske Bank and Eifo confirm they have entered into an agreement. In early December 2025, the agreement saved SR/Mark = it was a good agreement. March 2026, the same agreement is now taking the life out of SR/Mark = it is now a bad agreement. Mark turns 180 degrees and struggles in the net.
    13 t sitten
    ·
    13 t sitten
    ·
    Same same in my opinion.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    From borsen.dk no access Shape Robotics had its bankruptcy lifted last Friday, and a French investment company is now ready with a lifeline. However, there is a significant condition that currently blocks
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

DenmarkNasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
27.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
22.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
3.4.2025
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti
25.11.2024
2024 Q2 -tulosraportti
22.8.2024

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
200 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
27.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
22.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
3.4.2025
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti
25.11.2024
2024 Q2 -tulosraportti
22.8.2024

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 15 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    15 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    The decision to keep Eifo's credit termination secret was apparently taken by the board over Mark's head - when Mark explains the story. Mark has said that it was fully disclosed for 2 years, but it was "fully disclosed" among the board and Mark, and deliberately kept secret from shareholders until December 2025. The explanation was supposed to be that MAR did not allow the company to share the information (!) Mark directly says that MAR prevented the sharing of the information. (Note: MAR is precisely meant to ensure the market is informed and MAR is not created to be management's excuse for keeping information secret from the market.....) Mark does not believe it was material information that the company had had a credit line terminated, which was crucial for the company's operations. Even though it was millimeters from sending the company into bankruptcy.....one wonders about Mark's assessment of material information and that characterizes Mark's entire behavior.
  • 18 t sitten
    ·
    18 t sitten
    ·
    Mark's new straw man - SR and Danske Bank never entered into a repayment agreement, because Danske Bank has not signed the agreement "correctly" via e-signature. Marks has confirmed that the agreement exists by, among other things, signing the agreement, issuing a PR about the agreement, and paying the 1st agreed installment. Danske Bank has confirmed the agreement exists by endorsing the agreement with multiple signatures, by withdrawing the bankruptcy petition, and by receiving the 1st agreed installment. This strongly indicates that the agreement exists and the agreement is valid and binding, when both parties with their behavior show that an agreement has been entered into. This is stronger than a possible missing signature or some mess with Nem-id validation. Have a good weekend out there, both to the SR-critical and the Mark-loyal investors.
  • 19 t sitten
    ·
    19 t sitten
    ·
    Here excerpted from the internet. “A lawyer or a law firm acts in violation of good legal practice..., if the lawyer or law firm enters into a collaboration with other companies on terms or under circumstances where reasonably founded doubt can be raised as to whether the collaboration is compatible with the mentioned requirements for observing confidentiality and maintaining independence and integrity.” Covers a specific decision from the High Court, And to Kromann & Company, hand over the documents that exist, considering the 59 days you had responsibility in relation to the shareholders of Shape Robotics.
    18 t sitten
    ·
    18 t sitten
    ·
    Is there anything objective in the lawyer's actions that indicates that the lawyer has acted contrary to good legal practice?
    15 t sitten
    ·
    15 t sitten
    ·
    Kloun You are not very keen on talking about the process of Eifo's credit termination and the fact that Mark has been involved, either on his own, or together with the board, in withholding information from the market. Do you perhaps owe full transparency and fail to explain why you consistently protect Mark?
  • 20 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    20 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Here is a link to Friday's CEO video event https://www.wildceo.live/p/game-over-day-4-kurator-from-the-future-kromann-reumert-shape-robotics?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web The CEO goes live 5 minutes into the video. The post itself starts with “Yesterday at four in the morning, a DocuSign reminder landed in my inbox. It was from Kromann Reumert, asking me to sign a document called the Afviklingsaftale — the settlement agreement between Shape Robotics, Danske Bank, and EIFO. The same document that was used in court to justify the bankruptcy. The same document under which EUR 568,700 was paid from Romanian bank accounts into Kromann Reumert’s client account.” There is also more info here under news
    18 t sitten
    ·
    18 t sitten
    ·
    What does Mark need a "riminder" for now, besides cultivating "Wooden language" as always? Mark can simply read the press release that Mark himself issues on December 2, 2025 with the headline "Shape Robotics: Update on EIFO support withdrawal, bank facilities, and restructuring measures", where SR, Danske Bank and Eifo confirm they have entered into an agreement. In early December 2025, the agreement saved SR/Mark = it was a good agreement. March 2026, the same agreement is now taking the life out of SR/Mark = it is now a bad agreement. Mark turns 180 degrees and struggles in the net.
    13 t sitten
    ·
    13 t sitten
    ·
    Same same in my opinion.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    From borsen.dk no access Shape Robotics had its bankruptcy lifted last Friday, and a French investment company is now ready with a lifeline. However, there is a significant condition that currently blocks
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

DenmarkNasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt
© 2026 Nordnet Bank AB.
Nordnet | Alvar Aallon katu 5 C, 3. krs | FI-00100 Helsinki