2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
135 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·58 min sitten · Muokattu- ·3 t sitten
·3 t sittenMark complains somewhat about having to pay to read Lars K.'s CV? Interesting, But wait, hasn't Mark himself chosen to hide information behind a paywall? Do you know the type @kloun, who complains about something someone else does, while they themselves do the same? The topic? You get a hint. It starts with G and rhymes with Jette. Can you "guess" what it is :-) Mark also believes that Lars K. is untrustworthy and has nothing relevant to offer. Lars K. is probably the most preferred source in Denmark when it comes to professional insight into accounting, rules and ethics, and is deeply respected among auditors. #insightful and critical investor·2 t sittenKloun You clearly don't care for facts. So you need to calm down. 
·5 t sittenA short question kloun. When do we hear the result about appeal??·4 t sitten · MuokattuI believe Mark has said that we will know most of it in about 5 weeks' time, there are several important dates as I recall, and I now see nothing to prevent reconstruction from being chosen, it is a high court we are in now, here more time is spent on the legal aspects and not like in the district court where things move a bit faster and in this case, one clearly has a bias for the counterparty/system. I will see if I can find the dates, they are in one of the last wildceo. https://substack.wildceo.live/p·4 t sitten5 weeks - that probably fits quite well with my estimate of 1-2 months Nothing prevents a reconstruction, except for everything that speaks against a reconstruction :-)
·14 t sittenI check the comment thread on this stock from time to time, but nothing crucially new has happened from time to time. One lawsuit follows another, it's not moving an inch, so to speak, and in the meantime, SR's entire business foundation must have eroded away. This, consequently, will then lead to a flurry of compensation claims and lawsuits, but that's not running a business, it's a soap opera of a courtroom drama. There is probably not much value left in the company and IP for some robotics technology that has not been developed for at least the past year, where the Chinese, in particular, are literally sprinting ahead in the field, is not worth the paper it's written on. A restructuring will therefore be the same as starting a company from scratch, and there are no startups that get listed on the stock exchange from day 1. Mark Abraham has fought a brave battle, but surely no one is so naive as to believe that he won't get paid for this work if a restructuring were to succeed. This could, for example, be in the form of existing shareholders being sidelined in one way or another, as has been seen, for example, in SAS. This would give Mark Abraham the opportunity, especially if his partner's 3-digit million claim against the company survives a restructuring wholly or partially, to gain full control. In that situation, we existing shareholders have merely acted as alibis and useful idiots 😊 #usefulidiot
·15 t sitten · MuokattuA little further explanation regarding Børsen's article on Sunday. As Mark has written in this post - and with direct reference to the judgment, it has not been appealed by the Romanian authorities!! https://substack.wildceo.live/p/qed-brsen-kiertzner-and-the-case?utm_source=publication-search·15 t sittenBo What has SR delivered in terms of equipment or service to the customer? When I read "the verdict", it looks like a ruling in a case that overturns SR being excluded from a tender. It says nothing about SR having a real contract or having delivered any sales.... it sounds very mysterious and the Danish auditor slipped away...·5 t sittenKloun Can you document that SR was well-functioning before the bankruptcy and it was the bankruptcy early January that caused your "loss"? I think you have Mark as a primary source, and Mark as a secondary source, and Marks as a 3rd source and only source. There are neither external sources nor facts that support your recurring assessment.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
135 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·58 min sitten · Muokattu
- ·3 t sitten·3 t sittenMark complains somewhat about having to pay to read Lars K.'s CV? Interesting, But wait, hasn't Mark himself chosen to hide information behind a paywall? Do you know the type @kloun, who complains about something someone else does, while they themselves do the same? The topic? You get a hint. It starts with G and rhymes with Jette. Can you "guess" what it is :-) Mark also believes that Lars K. is untrustworthy and has nothing relevant to offer. Lars K. is probably the most preferred source in Denmark when it comes to professional insight into accounting, rules and ethics, and is deeply respected among auditors. #insightful and critical investor·2 t sittenKloun You clearly don't care for facts. So you need to calm down.
- ·5 t sittenA short question kloun. When do we hear the result about appeal??·4 t sitten · MuokattuI believe Mark has said that we will know most of it in about 5 weeks' time, there are several important dates as I recall, and I now see nothing to prevent reconstruction from being chosen, it is a high court we are in now, here more time is spent on the legal aspects and not like in the district court where things move a bit faster and in this case, one clearly has a bias for the counterparty/system. I will see if I can find the dates, they are in one of the last wildceo. https://substack.wildceo.live/p·4 t sitten5 weeks - that probably fits quite well with my estimate of 1-2 months Nothing prevents a reconstruction, except for everything that speaks against a reconstruction :-)
- ·14 t sittenI check the comment thread on this stock from time to time, but nothing crucially new has happened from time to time. One lawsuit follows another, it's not moving an inch, so to speak, and in the meantime, SR's entire business foundation must have eroded away. This, consequently, will then lead to a flurry of compensation claims and lawsuits, but that's not running a business, it's a soap opera of a courtroom drama. There is probably not much value left in the company and IP for some robotics technology that has not been developed for at least the past year, where the Chinese, in particular, are literally sprinting ahead in the field, is not worth the paper it's written on. A restructuring will therefore be the same as starting a company from scratch, and there are no startups that get listed on the stock exchange from day 1. Mark Abraham has fought a brave battle, but surely no one is so naive as to believe that he won't get paid for this work if a restructuring were to succeed. This could, for example, be in the form of existing shareholders being sidelined in one way or another, as has been seen, for example, in SAS. This would give Mark Abraham the opportunity, especially if his partner's 3-digit million claim against the company survives a restructuring wholly or partially, to gain full control. In that situation, we existing shareholders have merely acted as alibis and useful idiots 😊 #usefulidiot
- ·15 t sitten · MuokattuA little further explanation regarding Børsen's article on Sunday. As Mark has written in this post - and with direct reference to the judgment, it has not been appealed by the Romanian authorities!! https://substack.wildceo.live/p/qed-brsen-kiertzner-and-the-case?utm_source=publication-search·15 t sittenBo What has SR delivered in terms of equipment or service to the customer? When I read "the verdict", it looks like a ruling in a case that overturns SR being excluded from a tender. It says nothing about SR having a real contract or having delivered any sales.... it sounds very mysterious and the Danish auditor slipped away...·5 t sittenKloun Can you document that SR was well-functioning before the bankruptcy and it was the bankruptcy early January that caused your "loss"? I think you have Mark as a primary source, and Mark as a secondary source, and Marks as a 3rd source and only source. There are neither external sources nor facts that support your recurring assessment.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
135 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·58 min sitten · Muokattu
- ·3 t sitten·3 t sittenMark complains somewhat about having to pay to read Lars K.'s CV? Interesting, But wait, hasn't Mark himself chosen to hide information behind a paywall? Do you know the type @kloun, who complains about something someone else does, while they themselves do the same? The topic? You get a hint. It starts with G and rhymes with Jette. Can you "guess" what it is :-) Mark also believes that Lars K. is untrustworthy and has nothing relevant to offer. Lars K. is probably the most preferred source in Denmark when it comes to professional insight into accounting, rules and ethics, and is deeply respected among auditors. #insightful and critical investor·2 t sittenKloun You clearly don't care for facts. So you need to calm down.
- ·5 t sittenA short question kloun. When do we hear the result about appeal??·4 t sitten · MuokattuI believe Mark has said that we will know most of it in about 5 weeks' time, there are several important dates as I recall, and I now see nothing to prevent reconstruction from being chosen, it is a high court we are in now, here more time is spent on the legal aspects and not like in the district court where things move a bit faster and in this case, one clearly has a bias for the counterparty/system. I will see if I can find the dates, they are in one of the last wildceo. https://substack.wildceo.live/p·4 t sitten5 weeks - that probably fits quite well with my estimate of 1-2 months Nothing prevents a reconstruction, except for everything that speaks against a reconstruction :-)
- ·14 t sittenI check the comment thread on this stock from time to time, but nothing crucially new has happened from time to time. One lawsuit follows another, it's not moving an inch, so to speak, and in the meantime, SR's entire business foundation must have eroded away. This, consequently, will then lead to a flurry of compensation claims and lawsuits, but that's not running a business, it's a soap opera of a courtroom drama. There is probably not much value left in the company and IP for some robotics technology that has not been developed for at least the past year, where the Chinese, in particular, are literally sprinting ahead in the field, is not worth the paper it's written on. A restructuring will therefore be the same as starting a company from scratch, and there are no startups that get listed on the stock exchange from day 1. Mark Abraham has fought a brave battle, but surely no one is so naive as to believe that he won't get paid for this work if a restructuring were to succeed. This could, for example, be in the form of existing shareholders being sidelined in one way or another, as has been seen, for example, in SAS. This would give Mark Abraham the opportunity, especially if his partner's 3-digit million claim against the company survives a restructuring wholly or partially, to gain full control. In that situation, we existing shareholders have merely acted as alibis and useful idiots 😊 #usefulidiot
- ·15 t sitten · MuokattuA little further explanation regarding Børsen's article on Sunday. As Mark has written in this post - and with direct reference to the judgment, it has not been appealed by the Romanian authorities!! https://substack.wildceo.live/p/qed-brsen-kiertzner-and-the-case?utm_source=publication-search·15 t sittenBo What has SR delivered in terms of equipment or service to the customer? When I read "the verdict", it looks like a ruling in a case that overturns SR being excluded from a tender. It says nothing about SR having a real contract or having delivered any sales.... it sounds very mysterious and the Danish auditor slipped away...·5 t sittenKloun Can you document that SR was well-functioning before the bankruptcy and it was the bankruptcy early January that caused your "loss"? I think you have Mark as a primary source, and Mark as a secondary source, and Marks as a 3rd source and only source. There are neither external sources nor facts that support your recurring assessment.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt