2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
123 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
5 t sitten · Muokattu5 t sitten · MuokattuThe pump and dump part 1 of 4 https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/pump-and-dump-shape-part-1-of-4?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios
·13 t sittenWhy can't the company hire an auditor? If the auditor audits based on facts in the company, then they won't get into trouble.
·12 t sitten · MuokattuJacob - 2 auditors have left SR/Mark in 12 months. This is completely unheard of and indicates some significant challenges with cooperation and trust. Whether the problem is due to bad auditors or bad management remains unresolved. But many external parties see it as the ultimate red flag when an auditor leaves a collaboration prematurely. Mark also says, on December 19, 2025, that the auditor collaboration will cease and SR is having discussions with other auditors with appropriate international experience and competencies. Later it turns out that the auditor slammed the door due to a lack of trust in management and a lack of communication. That was not exactly the angle Mark had in focus on Dec 19, 2025, when he was to inform the market. Here it sounded more like the auditor was incompetent and SR had another and "better" auditor in mind. It can also be noted that none of the 4-5 large international auditors, recognized mind you, will take SR as a client due to the history. Which is why Mark's narrative on December 19, 2025, testifies to a person who has his very own approach to reality - so one might well understand why the auditor left.·7 t sitten · MuokattuPeter I write that the investor must take responsibility for their own actions. I write nothing about it being the investor's fault. I write that the blame should not be placed on anyone other than oneself - that does not mean it is the investor's fault - but it is certainly the investor's responsibility. It is not certain that it is anyone's fault. However, I doubt you have anything to contribute in that regard, when you can't even read what I'm writing.- ·20 t sitten · MuokattuToday's text (day 57) including Pay wall/board folders, the Catch 22 Kurator files situation, a call to appear in the Sø-og Handelsretten on May 11.. and more….. Enjoy https://substack.com/@wildceo/note/p-196437045?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
·1 päivä sittenMark has lost the plot when he demands that the company's owners (shareholders) must pay to get access to information about the company. He has a duty to inform the owners about all material information. The absurdities are piling up here.·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuØbo He has a very good reason to keep it behind a paywall - Watch the latest Live stream he has made and then you would find out why. If you are a shareholder who wants to get your investment back, you should rather be glad that he is thinking it through :)
·2 päivää sittenFor everyone who wants to look at the documents themselves: https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-56-the-board-folder?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v·1 päivä sittenNo payment no documents, what did you expect?·1 päivä sittenWell, listen here. You complain that there is no transparency. Even though there is transparency. One just has to pay to get access to the information. So the only thing one logically could complain about when it comes to transparency, is that one has to pay to get the information. And you complain that there is no transparency. Do I need to spell it out more clearly? Or have you learned to put 2 and 2 together?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
123 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 5 t sitten · Muokattu5 t sitten · MuokattuThe pump and dump part 1 of 4 https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/pump-and-dump-shape-part-1-of-4?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios
- ·13 t sittenWhy can't the company hire an auditor? If the auditor audits based on facts in the company, then they won't get into trouble.·12 t sitten · MuokattuJacob - 2 auditors have left SR/Mark in 12 months. This is completely unheard of and indicates some significant challenges with cooperation and trust. Whether the problem is due to bad auditors or bad management remains unresolved. But many external parties see it as the ultimate red flag when an auditor leaves a collaboration prematurely. Mark also says, on December 19, 2025, that the auditor collaboration will cease and SR is having discussions with other auditors with appropriate international experience and competencies. Later it turns out that the auditor slammed the door due to a lack of trust in management and a lack of communication. That was not exactly the angle Mark had in focus on Dec 19, 2025, when he was to inform the market. Here it sounded more like the auditor was incompetent and SR had another and "better" auditor in mind. It can also be noted that none of the 4-5 large international auditors, recognized mind you, will take SR as a client due to the history. Which is why Mark's narrative on December 19, 2025, testifies to a person who has his very own approach to reality - so one might well understand why the auditor left.·7 t sitten · MuokattuPeter I write that the investor must take responsibility for their own actions. I write nothing about it being the investor's fault. I write that the blame should not be placed on anyone other than oneself - that does not mean it is the investor's fault - but it is certainly the investor's responsibility. It is not certain that it is anyone's fault. However, I doubt you have anything to contribute in that regard, when you can't even read what I'm writing.
- ·20 t sitten · MuokattuToday's text (day 57) including Pay wall/board folders, the Catch 22 Kurator files situation, a call to appear in the Sø-og Handelsretten on May 11.. and more….. Enjoy https://substack.com/@wildceo/note/p-196437045?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
- ·1 päivä sittenMark has lost the plot when he demands that the company's owners (shareholders) must pay to get access to information about the company. He has a duty to inform the owners about all material information. The absurdities are piling up here.·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuØbo He has a very good reason to keep it behind a paywall - Watch the latest Live stream he has made and then you would find out why. If you are a shareholder who wants to get your investment back, you should rather be glad that he is thinking it through :)
- ·2 päivää sittenFor everyone who wants to look at the documents themselves: https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-56-the-board-folder?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v·1 päivä sittenNo payment no documents, what did you expect?·1 päivä sittenWell, listen here. You complain that there is no transparency. Even though there is transparency. One just has to pay to get access to the information. So the only thing one logically could complain about when it comes to transparency, is that one has to pay to get the information. And you complain that there is no transparency. Do I need to spell it out more clearly? Or have you learned to put 2 and 2 together?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
123 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 5 t sitten · Muokattu5 t sitten · MuokattuThe pump and dump part 1 of 4 https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/pump-and-dump-shape-part-1-of-4?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios
- ·13 t sittenWhy can't the company hire an auditor? If the auditor audits based on facts in the company, then they won't get into trouble.·12 t sitten · MuokattuJacob - 2 auditors have left SR/Mark in 12 months. This is completely unheard of and indicates some significant challenges with cooperation and trust. Whether the problem is due to bad auditors or bad management remains unresolved. But many external parties see it as the ultimate red flag when an auditor leaves a collaboration prematurely. Mark also says, on December 19, 2025, that the auditor collaboration will cease and SR is having discussions with other auditors with appropriate international experience and competencies. Later it turns out that the auditor slammed the door due to a lack of trust in management and a lack of communication. That was not exactly the angle Mark had in focus on Dec 19, 2025, when he was to inform the market. Here it sounded more like the auditor was incompetent and SR had another and "better" auditor in mind. It can also be noted that none of the 4-5 large international auditors, recognized mind you, will take SR as a client due to the history. Which is why Mark's narrative on December 19, 2025, testifies to a person who has his very own approach to reality - so one might well understand why the auditor left.·7 t sitten · MuokattuPeter I write that the investor must take responsibility for their own actions. I write nothing about it being the investor's fault. I write that the blame should not be placed on anyone other than oneself - that does not mean it is the investor's fault - but it is certainly the investor's responsibility. It is not certain that it is anyone's fault. However, I doubt you have anything to contribute in that regard, when you can't even read what I'm writing.
- ·20 t sitten · MuokattuToday's text (day 57) including Pay wall/board folders, the Catch 22 Kurator files situation, a call to appear in the Sø-og Handelsretten on May 11.. and more….. Enjoy https://substack.com/@wildceo/note/p-196437045?r=5lpe1c&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
- ·1 päivä sittenMark has lost the plot when he demands that the company's owners (shareholders) must pay to get access to information about the company. He has a duty to inform the owners about all material information. The absurdities are piling up here.·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuØbo He has a very good reason to keep it behind a paywall - Watch the latest Live stream he has made and then you would find out why. If you are a shareholder who wants to get your investment back, you should rather be glad that he is thinking it through :)
- ·2 päivää sittenFor everyone who wants to look at the documents themselves: https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-56-the-board-folder?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v·1 päivä sittenNo payment no documents, what did you expect?·1 päivä sittenWell, listen here. You complain that there is no transparency. Even though there is transparency. One just has to pay to get access to the information. So the only thing one logically could complain about when it comes to transparency, is that one has to pay to get the information. And you complain that there is no transparency. Do I need to spell it out more clearly? Or have you learned to put 2 and 2 together?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt