2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
120 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·4 t sittenFor everyone who wants to look at the documents themselves: https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-56-the-board-folder?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v
·14 t sittenThe constructed "earn-out" agreement of 217 mkr Mark says 1 to 1 that the "earn-out" agreement is designed in case of bankruptcy/dismissal and that the agreement was changed the year after the original agreement was entered into. I well understand a liquidator questioning whether the agreement is valid, when the agreement primarily serves the purpose of emptying the company. Entering into an agreement where the company is obligated beyond its capabilities can render an agreement invalid, and therefore the liquidator says no, it is not a real creditor claim, but only designed to be a "poison pill" if SR should fall. The agreement is not reasonable and the agreement has payment terms which alone could drive the company into bankruptcy. Looking forward to May 11th, when a restructuring will be negotiated, but I think the real creditors will fight against this fraudulent enterprise being able to continue.·10 t sittenAt present, much of what is being discussed remains unresolved and based on interpretations. The earn-out structure can be criticized, but it can also be understood as a way to manage risk in case of termination or insolvency. This does not in itself make it fraud. The only issue that has so far been concretely problematized to some extent relates to the 'pump' around Lars Topholm. Furthermore, the rest must be clarified by the courts. If the promissory note defense is recognized, it could significantly change the understanding of the entire process. Until then, it makes the most sense to let the legal process take its course rather than drawing firm conclusions.·7 t sittenBQRS Yes, a formal reprimand and nothing else. I can easily call that a remark. A remark completely without any form of consequences for the recipient. Therefore, the word remark fits quite well, and pay attention to the word "probably" in your post. There has precisely been no evidence presented for "pump", and therefore "probably" is written, so the sender has not committed to something that could resemble a statement requiring documentation. That is namely an action that takes place in the legal system and not with the supervisory authority. That is exactly what I have written.- ·19 t sittenWhen can one sell/ when is it declared bankrupt so one can use it to offset tax from the sale of other shares? 😁 I'm about to sell shares, but don't know if it's stupid to do before this share has been marked as a loss so I can use this loss to sell other shares without tax?
·14 t sitten · MuokattuIt's hard to say, but it's a hearing on May 11th in the Maritime and Commercial Court where it will be dealt with, and here it can end with liquidation/bankruptcy or reconstruction, we will know more on May 11th. The CEO and a number of shareholders are going all in on reconstruction based on the principle that it's better to preserve than to destroy value. Read more here, it's being fought tooth and nail. https://substack.wildceo.live/p As you can see, the CEO has been very active, the other party, however, is silent as the grave.·7 t sittenKloun As always, I am pleased that I can contribute to the objective debate here. As previously written, the lawyer works under both confidentiality and professional secrecy. I therefore have no objective reasons to question the secrecy. It is expected in my view. Should the trustee have done something wrong, then I think that discussion belongs when a court has spoken. - ·2 päivää sittenToday's live. Hope this answers the questions you asked. Good weekend https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-55-friday-q-and-a-jrgen?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v
·10 t sittenPump and dump, I must apologize for, it had no basis, the documents tell me something else, but I'm not a lawyer or an accountant, so one probably doesn't understand that. I can be happy on others' behalf, you will have enormous amounts of time freed up when May 11th is over, it must also have been a big burden for you to be on 24/7 all days of the week. I don't want this endless and meaningless dialogue anymore. I'm going out to sea in my Bette 47-foot motorboat.·10 t sittenThis is pure hobby, pleasure and not least professional pride. I keep myself sharp while I can help you Kloun, Bo, Bongo, Jesper mf along the way, if you otherwise seized the opportunity. - ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuToday at 16:30 I'm joining the daily Q&A session on Substack, and I'm going to ask some really challenging questions. Do you have anything you're wondering about and want answers to? Submit it below·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuThanks for the good initiative and good questions and good answers and a good weekend to all. All is well, as you can see, Reconstruction day is approaching, and then maybe nerves can settle. “Stay tuned” May 11th in Sø- og Handelsretten.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
120 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sittenFor everyone who wants to look at the documents themselves: https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-56-the-board-folder?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v
- ·14 t sittenThe constructed "earn-out" agreement of 217 mkr Mark says 1 to 1 that the "earn-out" agreement is designed in case of bankruptcy/dismissal and that the agreement was changed the year after the original agreement was entered into. I well understand a liquidator questioning whether the agreement is valid, when the agreement primarily serves the purpose of emptying the company. Entering into an agreement where the company is obligated beyond its capabilities can render an agreement invalid, and therefore the liquidator says no, it is not a real creditor claim, but only designed to be a "poison pill" if SR should fall. The agreement is not reasonable and the agreement has payment terms which alone could drive the company into bankruptcy. Looking forward to May 11th, when a restructuring will be negotiated, but I think the real creditors will fight against this fraudulent enterprise being able to continue.·10 t sittenAt present, much of what is being discussed remains unresolved and based on interpretations. The earn-out structure can be criticized, but it can also be understood as a way to manage risk in case of termination or insolvency. This does not in itself make it fraud. The only issue that has so far been concretely problematized to some extent relates to the 'pump' around Lars Topholm. Furthermore, the rest must be clarified by the courts. If the promissory note defense is recognized, it could significantly change the understanding of the entire process. Until then, it makes the most sense to let the legal process take its course rather than drawing firm conclusions.·7 t sittenBQRS Yes, a formal reprimand and nothing else. I can easily call that a remark. A remark completely without any form of consequences for the recipient. Therefore, the word remark fits quite well, and pay attention to the word "probably" in your post. There has precisely been no evidence presented for "pump", and therefore "probably" is written, so the sender has not committed to something that could resemble a statement requiring documentation. That is namely an action that takes place in the legal system and not with the supervisory authority. That is exactly what I have written.
- ·19 t sittenWhen can one sell/ when is it declared bankrupt so one can use it to offset tax from the sale of other shares? 😁 I'm about to sell shares, but don't know if it's stupid to do before this share has been marked as a loss so I can use this loss to sell other shares without tax?·14 t sitten · MuokattuIt's hard to say, but it's a hearing on May 11th in the Maritime and Commercial Court where it will be dealt with, and here it can end with liquidation/bankruptcy or reconstruction, we will know more on May 11th. The CEO and a number of shareholders are going all in on reconstruction based on the principle that it's better to preserve than to destroy value. Read more here, it's being fought tooth and nail. https://substack.wildceo.live/p As you can see, the CEO has been very active, the other party, however, is silent as the grave.·7 t sittenKloun As always, I am pleased that I can contribute to the objective debate here. As previously written, the lawyer works under both confidentiality and professional secrecy. I therefore have no objective reasons to question the secrecy. It is expected in my view. Should the trustee have done something wrong, then I think that discussion belongs when a court has spoken.
- ·2 päivää sittenToday's live. Hope this answers the questions you asked. Good weekend https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-55-friday-q-and-a-jrgen?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v·10 t sittenPump and dump, I must apologize for, it had no basis, the documents tell me something else, but I'm not a lawyer or an accountant, so one probably doesn't understand that. I can be happy on others' behalf, you will have enormous amounts of time freed up when May 11th is over, it must also have been a big burden for you to be on 24/7 all days of the week. I don't want this endless and meaningless dialogue anymore. I'm going out to sea in my Bette 47-foot motorboat.·10 t sittenThis is pure hobby, pleasure and not least professional pride. I keep myself sharp while I can help you Kloun, Bo, Bongo, Jesper mf along the way, if you otherwise seized the opportunity.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuToday at 16:30 I'm joining the daily Q&A session on Substack, and I'm going to ask some really challenging questions. Do you have anything you're wondering about and want answers to? Submit it below·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuThanks for the good initiative and good questions and good answers and a good weekend to all. All is well, as you can see, Reconstruction day is approaching, and then maybe nerves can settle. “Stay tuned” May 11th in Sø- og Handelsretten.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
120 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sittenFor everyone who wants to look at the documents themselves: https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-56-the-board-folder?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v
- ·14 t sittenThe constructed "earn-out" agreement of 217 mkr Mark says 1 to 1 that the "earn-out" agreement is designed in case of bankruptcy/dismissal and that the agreement was changed the year after the original agreement was entered into. I well understand a liquidator questioning whether the agreement is valid, when the agreement primarily serves the purpose of emptying the company. Entering into an agreement where the company is obligated beyond its capabilities can render an agreement invalid, and therefore the liquidator says no, it is not a real creditor claim, but only designed to be a "poison pill" if SR should fall. The agreement is not reasonable and the agreement has payment terms which alone could drive the company into bankruptcy. Looking forward to May 11th, when a restructuring will be negotiated, but I think the real creditors will fight against this fraudulent enterprise being able to continue.·10 t sittenAt present, much of what is being discussed remains unresolved and based on interpretations. The earn-out structure can be criticized, but it can also be understood as a way to manage risk in case of termination or insolvency. This does not in itself make it fraud. The only issue that has so far been concretely problematized to some extent relates to the 'pump' around Lars Topholm. Furthermore, the rest must be clarified by the courts. If the promissory note defense is recognized, it could significantly change the understanding of the entire process. Until then, it makes the most sense to let the legal process take its course rather than drawing firm conclusions.·7 t sittenBQRS Yes, a formal reprimand and nothing else. I can easily call that a remark. A remark completely without any form of consequences for the recipient. Therefore, the word remark fits quite well, and pay attention to the word "probably" in your post. There has precisely been no evidence presented for "pump", and therefore "probably" is written, so the sender has not committed to something that could resemble a statement requiring documentation. That is namely an action that takes place in the legal system and not with the supervisory authority. That is exactly what I have written.
- ·19 t sittenWhen can one sell/ when is it declared bankrupt so one can use it to offset tax from the sale of other shares? 😁 I'm about to sell shares, but don't know if it's stupid to do before this share has been marked as a loss so I can use this loss to sell other shares without tax?·14 t sitten · MuokattuIt's hard to say, but it's a hearing on May 11th in the Maritime and Commercial Court where it will be dealt with, and here it can end with liquidation/bankruptcy or reconstruction, we will know more on May 11th. The CEO and a number of shareholders are going all in on reconstruction based on the principle that it's better to preserve than to destroy value. Read more here, it's being fought tooth and nail. https://substack.wildceo.live/p As you can see, the CEO has been very active, the other party, however, is silent as the grave.·7 t sittenKloun As always, I am pleased that I can contribute to the objective debate here. As previously written, the lawyer works under both confidentiality and professional secrecy. I therefore have no objective reasons to question the secrecy. It is expected in my view. Should the trustee have done something wrong, then I think that discussion belongs when a court has spoken.
- ·2 päivää sittenToday's live. Hope this answers the questions you asked. Good weekend https://open.substack.com/pub/wildceo/p/game-over-day-55-friday-q-and-a-jrgen?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4nxr1v·10 t sittenPump and dump, I must apologize for, it had no basis, the documents tell me something else, but I'm not a lawyer or an accountant, so one probably doesn't understand that. I can be happy on others' behalf, you will have enormous amounts of time freed up when May 11th is over, it must also have been a big burden for you to be on 24/7 all days of the week. I don't want this endless and meaningless dialogue anymore. I'm going out to sea in my Bette 47-foot motorboat.·10 t sittenThis is pure hobby, pleasure and not least professional pride. I keep myself sharp while I can help you Kloun, Bo, Bongo, Jesper mf along the way, if you otherwise seized the opportunity.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuToday at 16:30 I'm joining the daily Q&A session on Substack, and I'm going to ask some really challenging questions. Do you have anything you're wondering about and want answers to? Submit it below·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuThanks for the good initiative and good questions and good answers and a good weekend to all. All is well, as you can see, Reconstruction day is approaching, and then maybe nerves can settle. “Stay tuned” May 11th in Sø- og Handelsretten.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt