2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
129 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·7 t sittenWe just have to await the course of events. All that is written in here is without significance, or have I misunderstood something?
·5 t sitten · Muokattu@Myggen1 Can't one say that sharing Mark Abraham's post provides useful knowledge about the matter, especially if one is a shareholder and when there is serious talk about a reconstruction, of course in case of bankruptcy then it's irrelevant, that nuance should probably be included in your assessment. @Myggen1- ·14 t sitten · MuokattuToday's good question. And then just the last one for now from my side, it's in relation to SR. Here excerpted from Substack "After another sleepless night thinking about the trial and how to improve our chances, I came to a single conclusion: we need to gain the court's trust. But what do you do when the Danish trust system itself isn't trustworthy? Trusting the trust system can't answer a single question. Why, on the 6th of January, when the unlawful bankruptcy of Shape was ruled at the Maritime and Commercial Court, did the judge not even grant a short adjournment to make sure we were present? Shape Robotics is not a coffee shop you can declare bankrupt in a single court day without the management in the room. Asking for advice. 🙏" Any suggestions
·1 t sittenKloun What I am writing is not about the court, but how the company stood before a number of creditors had enough. Financial statements have not been submitted since 1Q 2025, so what basis is there for there being money in the bank without financial statements, and creditors not being paid. 
·1 päivä sittenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwTg80akmY4 New live video from Mark·16 t sittenPeter You write that Teis as trustee has "a clear duty" to dispute the claim of 217 mkr. Is it in Romania or in Denmark where there is "a clear duty"? How does this clear duty arise? Teis disputes the claim in Danish bankruptcy law, which is completely by the book according to my knowledge, but I don't know everything, so I hope you can bring some factual knowledge to the table.
1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenny substack: According to information we have received, the High Court is expected to rule on the forced liquidation this week. We expect Teis to be removed as liquidator — which would render today's bankruptcy ruling, and his opposition to reconstruction, null and void. It is also worth noting that today's decision-making process in court included an analysis of articles from Børsen. :) That said, I must again emphasise that we will not comment on the decision itself. A strong appeal is coming, and our arguments are solid. Unfortunately, the judge did not appear to understand how a promissory note operates — but we will respectfully address that on the record.·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuProgression You mean, the promissory note which he apparently allowed to become fully valid in Romania? Which he now in court in Denmark said was not valid? It seems he has known about it since January 26. But didn't quite take the time to dispute it. So now it is finally registered in Romania and can no longer be challenged there. I think it's strange if he now stands and contradicts himself. And even in court. Makes one think... Did he really do his proper duty as a trustee. Or if he perhaps was so busy covering his own ass, that he has now committed a catastrophic error? We'll have to find that out.·15 t sitten · MuokattuPeter Regarding the answer about the validity of the promissory note. I have previously written my assessment of the claim in the bankruptcy and am therefore not surprised that neither Teis nor the court has found that the claim should not be recognized. Whether it is valid in Romania? I don't know and I am also somewhat indifferent. My primary focus is on the Danish bankruptcy which is handled according to Danish law. What do you say? You sound enormously surprised about the bankruptcy decree yesterday. Have you only listened to Mark or do you remember to listen to other sources, so you ensure your knowledge as best as possible.- ·1 päivä sittenHow does that affect Mark's demand against Nasdaq and Nasdaq's upholding of the suspension, despite Mark's demand to have trading resumed? Does that put Mark in a better position?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
129 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·7 t sittenWe just have to await the course of events. All that is written in here is without significance, or have I misunderstood something?·5 t sitten · Muokattu@Myggen1 Can't one say that sharing Mark Abraham's post provides useful knowledge about the matter, especially if one is a shareholder and when there is serious talk about a reconstruction, of course in case of bankruptcy then it's irrelevant, that nuance should probably be included in your assessment. @Myggen1
- ·14 t sitten · MuokattuToday's good question. And then just the last one for now from my side, it's in relation to SR. Here excerpted from Substack "After another sleepless night thinking about the trial and how to improve our chances, I came to a single conclusion: we need to gain the court's trust. But what do you do when the Danish trust system itself isn't trustworthy? Trusting the trust system can't answer a single question. Why, on the 6th of January, when the unlawful bankruptcy of Shape was ruled at the Maritime and Commercial Court, did the judge not even grant a short adjournment to make sure we were present? Shape Robotics is not a coffee shop you can declare bankrupt in a single court day without the management in the room. Asking for advice. 🙏" Any suggestions·1 t sittenKloun What I am writing is not about the court, but how the company stood before a number of creditors had enough. Financial statements have not been submitted since 1Q 2025, so what basis is there for there being money in the bank without financial statements, and creditors not being paid.
- ·1 päivä sittenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwTg80akmY4 New live video from Mark·16 t sittenPeter You write that Teis as trustee has "a clear duty" to dispute the claim of 217 mkr. Is it in Romania or in Denmark where there is "a clear duty"? How does this clear duty arise? Teis disputes the claim in Danish bankruptcy law, which is completely by the book according to my knowledge, but I don't know everything, so I hope you can bring some factual knowledge to the table.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenny substack: According to information we have received, the High Court is expected to rule on the forced liquidation this week. We expect Teis to be removed as liquidator — which would render today's bankruptcy ruling, and his opposition to reconstruction, null and void. It is also worth noting that today's decision-making process in court included an analysis of articles from Børsen. :) That said, I must again emphasise that we will not comment on the decision itself. A strong appeal is coming, and our arguments are solid. Unfortunately, the judge did not appear to understand how a promissory note operates — but we will respectfully address that on the record.·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuProgression You mean, the promissory note which he apparently allowed to become fully valid in Romania? Which he now in court in Denmark said was not valid? It seems he has known about it since January 26. But didn't quite take the time to dispute it. So now it is finally registered in Romania and can no longer be challenged there. I think it's strange if he now stands and contradicts himself. And even in court. Makes one think... Did he really do his proper duty as a trustee. Or if he perhaps was so busy covering his own ass, that he has now committed a catastrophic error? We'll have to find that out.·15 t sitten · MuokattuPeter Regarding the answer about the validity of the promissory note. I have previously written my assessment of the claim in the bankruptcy and am therefore not surprised that neither Teis nor the court has found that the claim should not be recognized. Whether it is valid in Romania? I don't know and I am also somewhat indifferent. My primary focus is on the Danish bankruptcy which is handled according to Danish law. What do you say? You sound enormously surprised about the bankruptcy decree yesterday. Have you only listened to Mark or do you remember to listen to other sources, so you ensure your knowledge as best as possible.
- ·1 päivä sittenHow does that affect Mark's demand against Nasdaq and Nasdaq's upholding of the suspension, despite Mark's demand to have trading resumed? Does that put Mark in a better position?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
129 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.1. | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 27.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·7 t sittenWe just have to await the course of events. All that is written in here is without significance, or have I misunderstood something?·5 t sitten · Muokattu@Myggen1 Can't one say that sharing Mark Abraham's post provides useful knowledge about the matter, especially if one is a shareholder and when there is serious talk about a reconstruction, of course in case of bankruptcy then it's irrelevant, that nuance should probably be included in your assessment. @Myggen1
- ·14 t sitten · MuokattuToday's good question. And then just the last one for now from my side, it's in relation to SR. Here excerpted from Substack "After another sleepless night thinking about the trial and how to improve our chances, I came to a single conclusion: we need to gain the court's trust. But what do you do when the Danish trust system itself isn't trustworthy? Trusting the trust system can't answer a single question. Why, on the 6th of January, when the unlawful bankruptcy of Shape was ruled at the Maritime and Commercial Court, did the judge not even grant a short adjournment to make sure we were present? Shape Robotics is not a coffee shop you can declare bankrupt in a single court day without the management in the room. Asking for advice. 🙏" Any suggestions·1 t sittenKloun What I am writing is not about the court, but how the company stood before a number of creditors had enough. Financial statements have not been submitted since 1Q 2025, so what basis is there for there being money in the bank without financial statements, and creditors not being paid.
- ·1 päivä sittenhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwTg80akmY4 New live video from Mark·16 t sittenPeter You write that Teis as trustee has "a clear duty" to dispute the claim of 217 mkr. Is it in Romania or in Denmark where there is "a clear duty"? How does this clear duty arise? Teis disputes the claim in Danish bankruptcy law, which is completely by the book according to my knowledge, but I don't know everything, so I hope you can bring some factual knowledge to the table.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenny substack: According to information we have received, the High Court is expected to rule on the forced liquidation this week. We expect Teis to be removed as liquidator — which would render today's bankruptcy ruling, and his opposition to reconstruction, null and void. It is also worth noting that today's decision-making process in court included an analysis of articles from Børsen. :) That said, I must again emphasise that we will not comment on the decision itself. A strong appeal is coming, and our arguments are solid. Unfortunately, the judge did not appear to understand how a promissory note operates — but we will respectfully address that on the record.·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuProgression You mean, the promissory note which he apparently allowed to become fully valid in Romania? Which he now in court in Denmark said was not valid? It seems he has known about it since January 26. But didn't quite take the time to dispute it. So now it is finally registered in Romania and can no longer be challenged there. I think it's strange if he now stands and contradicts himself. And even in court. Makes one think... Did he really do his proper duty as a trustee. Or if he perhaps was so busy covering his own ass, that he has now committed a catastrophic error? We'll have to find that out.·15 t sitten · MuokattuPeter Regarding the answer about the validity of the promissory note. I have previously written my assessment of the claim in the bankruptcy and am therefore not surprised that neither Teis nor the court has found that the claim should not be recognized. Whether it is valid in Romania? I don't know and I am also somewhat indifferent. My primary focus is on the Danish bankruptcy which is handled according to Danish law. What do you say? You sound enormously surprised about the bankruptcy decree yesterday. Have you only listened to Mark or do you remember to listen to other sources, so you ensure your knowledge as best as possible.
- ·1 päivä sittenHow does that affect Mark's demand against Nasdaq and Nasdaq's upholding of the suspension, despite Mark's demand to have trading resumed? Does that put Mark in a better position?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt