2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
23 päivää sitten40 min
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
91 424
Myynti
Määrä
10 030
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 603 | - | - | ||
| 14 | - | - | ||
| 406 | - | - | ||
| 505 | - | - | ||
| 150 | - | - |
Ylin
139VWAP
Alin
138,2VaihtoMäärä
26,4 190 765
VWAP
Ylin
139Alin
138,2VaihtoMäärä
26,4 190 765
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 20.11. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 14.8. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 13.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 20.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 15.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenWe will see more acquisitions of old traditional companies that for several years have been neglected by investors, as more or less all chase the same giant tech, AI companies and partly arms companies, which for the same reason are today extremely overvalued, tending towards a regular stock bubble. It is generally peculiar to observe how different asset classes are priced completely differently today, where the aforementioned giant companies are overvalued to an unprecedented extent, along with property prices, especially around the large metropolises, which are also approaching bubble conditions. Meanwhile, the interest and thus the pricing of more traditional companies has been sharply declining.... at least until now. I believe in a nascent rotation from the giant companies to the more traditional industries, and this will mean more acquisitions and mergers with opportunities for significant premiums in the range of 50-100%. The pricing has simply become far too skewed between the different categories of shares and other asset classes.
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI don't disagree. But companies of this type can buy back shares if they really make money and thereby create enormous shareholder value. That makes a lot of sense if the companies are valued ultra-low. A good example of a guy who knows how to spot these companies is Michael Hypholdt. Check out Regulær invest. It's doing well.
1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenNordea has an EPS 2026 estimate 1,73 euros. So that offer of DKK 140 has P/E around 10,6. Very low and expecting higher offers closer to DKK 200 with P/E 2026 15-16.
·1 päivä sittenSo, do I understand correctly that they will give what corresponds to 155 per share. And if that holds water, then you can forget about anything higher. Otherwise, it probably doesn't make sense.....who would pay more than the price they have to pay for the item 155....that's throwing money away .... unless one considers it like paying at a restaurant +tip. Or there are buyers who want to buy the share at an inflated price and thus throw even more money away.....·1 päivä sittenHave tried to find a more reliable source for the 155 DKK. Must admit...I couldn't. So the price DKK 155 DKK from Apollo is thus - as I see it - currently not confirmed as an official bid. Only rumors - I apologize for having taken it as official. It is probably an expression of market expectations for a higher counter-bid. On the other hand - as you Eläköön also write - an official bid of 140 DKK has been made. If there are no other bids, and it is accepted, there is - if one buys the share at the current daily price - a "possible" gain of 1.60 DKK depending on the share's development, Good luck....- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI don't own the stock. And I'm considering buying the stock and started looking at the financial statements. (I use Owner Earnings to calculate from). I discover that they have a good business but have a very large debt, which ruins their financial statements. In 2025, Net Income is negative by a good 13 million euro. But the business itself is good.......the debt sends them to the mat :-( In million euro, the overall calculation is: - Interest expenses -27.6 (Nilfisk's total debt is 505.4 million EUR) - Net Income:-13.4 Sustainable Operating Income: 25 million (only remains positive due to depreciation/amortization). - Net Debt/EBITDA ratio: And almost all EBITDA goes to interest. The result was that operations (EBIT) (their core business) itself generates a profit of +28.3 million euro, and the core business can just cover operating costs and generate a positive profit, but debt eats EVERYTHING. In other words, Nilfisk is in a dangerous predicament: - They have a good business (EBIT) that makes money. - but debt ruins an otherwise healthy business. So there is no future for investment here....for me, that is. BUT, then I suddenly discover that they "might" be acquired by Apollo (unless there's something I haven't seen). Now it becomes interesting to see what Nilfisk is actually worth. And what will be paid for the company and what that is in relation to the current share price. Apollo certainly doesn't use the Owner Earnings method, but looks at how many times they pay for Nilfisk's earnings (EBITDA) and revenue in relation to comparable companies (Peers). They are buying the whole of Nilfisk, which includes both shareholder value (market capitalization) and Nilfisk's enormous debt. This corresponds to Enterprise Value (EV) = Market Capitalization + Net Debt) And Market Capitalization = 4,154 million DKK (155 DKK/share × 26.8 million shares) + Net Debt = 3,522 Enterprise Value thus becomes = 7,676 million DKK They will ultimately offer the equivalent of 155 DKK per share to the shareholders A high price, but they are probably paying for the potential, where they might look at Nilfisk's positive operating result (EBIT) and "believe/think" they can solve the debt and efficiency problems. I haven't been in any debate and there has probably been a lot of talk about the acquisition... apologies if so. At this moment, I would say that one can earn - per share - the difference between the current price minus 155 per share. Fair winds.......
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
23 päivää sitten40 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenWe will see more acquisitions of old traditional companies that for several years have been neglected by investors, as more or less all chase the same giant tech, AI companies and partly arms companies, which for the same reason are today extremely overvalued, tending towards a regular stock bubble. It is generally peculiar to observe how different asset classes are priced completely differently today, where the aforementioned giant companies are overvalued to an unprecedented extent, along with property prices, especially around the large metropolises, which are also approaching bubble conditions. Meanwhile, the interest and thus the pricing of more traditional companies has been sharply declining.... at least until now. I believe in a nascent rotation from the giant companies to the more traditional industries, and this will mean more acquisitions and mergers with opportunities for significant premiums in the range of 50-100%. The pricing has simply become far too skewed between the different categories of shares and other asset classes.·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI don't disagree. But companies of this type can buy back shares if they really make money and thereby create enormous shareholder value. That makes a lot of sense if the companies are valued ultra-low. A good example of a guy who knows how to spot these companies is Michael Hypholdt. Check out Regulær invest. It's doing well.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenNordea has an EPS 2026 estimate 1,73 euros. So that offer of DKK 140 has P/E around 10,6. Very low and expecting higher offers closer to DKK 200 with P/E 2026 15-16.·1 päivä sittenSo, do I understand correctly that they will give what corresponds to 155 per share. And if that holds water, then you can forget about anything higher. Otherwise, it probably doesn't make sense.....who would pay more than the price they have to pay for the item 155....that's throwing money away .... unless one considers it like paying at a restaurant +tip. Or there are buyers who want to buy the share at an inflated price and thus throw even more money away.....·1 päivä sittenHave tried to find a more reliable source for the 155 DKK. Must admit...I couldn't. So the price DKK 155 DKK from Apollo is thus - as I see it - currently not confirmed as an official bid. Only rumors - I apologize for having taken it as official. It is probably an expression of market expectations for a higher counter-bid. On the other hand - as you Eläköön also write - an official bid of 140 DKK has been made. If there are no other bids, and it is accepted, there is - if one buys the share at the current daily price - a "possible" gain of 1.60 DKK depending on the share's development, Good luck....
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI don't own the stock. And I'm considering buying the stock and started looking at the financial statements. (I use Owner Earnings to calculate from). I discover that they have a good business but have a very large debt, which ruins their financial statements. In 2025, Net Income is negative by a good 13 million euro. But the business itself is good.......the debt sends them to the mat :-( In million euro, the overall calculation is: - Interest expenses -27.6 (Nilfisk's total debt is 505.4 million EUR) - Net Income:-13.4 Sustainable Operating Income: 25 million (only remains positive due to depreciation/amortization). - Net Debt/EBITDA ratio: And almost all EBITDA goes to interest. The result was that operations (EBIT) (their core business) itself generates a profit of +28.3 million euro, and the core business can just cover operating costs and generate a positive profit, but debt eats EVERYTHING. In other words, Nilfisk is in a dangerous predicament: - They have a good business (EBIT) that makes money. - but debt ruins an otherwise healthy business. So there is no future for investment here....for me, that is. BUT, then I suddenly discover that they "might" be acquired by Apollo (unless there's something I haven't seen). Now it becomes interesting to see what Nilfisk is actually worth. And what will be paid for the company and what that is in relation to the current share price. Apollo certainly doesn't use the Owner Earnings method, but looks at how many times they pay for Nilfisk's earnings (EBITDA) and revenue in relation to comparable companies (Peers). They are buying the whole of Nilfisk, which includes both shareholder value (market capitalization) and Nilfisk's enormous debt. This corresponds to Enterprise Value (EV) = Market Capitalization + Net Debt) And Market Capitalization = 4,154 million DKK (155 DKK/share × 26.8 million shares) + Net Debt = 3,522 Enterprise Value thus becomes = 7,676 million DKK They will ultimately offer the equivalent of 155 DKK per share to the shareholders A high price, but they are probably paying for the potential, where they might look at Nilfisk's positive operating result (EBIT) and "believe/think" they can solve the debt and efficiency problems. I haven't been in any debate and there has probably been a lot of talk about the acquisition... apologies if so. At this moment, I would say that one can earn - per share - the difference between the current price minus 155 per share. Fair winds.......
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
91 424
Myynti
Määrä
10 030
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 603 | - | - | ||
| 14 | - | - | ||
| 406 | - | - | ||
| 505 | - | - | ||
| 150 | - | - |
Ylin
139VWAP
Alin
138,2VaihtoMäärä
26,4 190 765
VWAP
Ylin
139Alin
138,2VaihtoMäärä
26,4 190 765
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 20.11. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 14.8. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 13.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 20.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 15.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
23 päivää sitten40 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 26.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 20.11. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 14.8. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 13.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 20.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 15.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenWe will see more acquisitions of old traditional companies that for several years have been neglected by investors, as more or less all chase the same giant tech, AI companies and partly arms companies, which for the same reason are today extremely overvalued, tending towards a regular stock bubble. It is generally peculiar to observe how different asset classes are priced completely differently today, where the aforementioned giant companies are overvalued to an unprecedented extent, along with property prices, especially around the large metropolises, which are also approaching bubble conditions. Meanwhile, the interest and thus the pricing of more traditional companies has been sharply declining.... at least until now. I believe in a nascent rotation from the giant companies to the more traditional industries, and this will mean more acquisitions and mergers with opportunities for significant premiums in the range of 50-100%. The pricing has simply become far too skewed between the different categories of shares and other asset classes.·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI don't disagree. But companies of this type can buy back shares if they really make money and thereby create enormous shareholder value. That makes a lot of sense if the companies are valued ultra-low. A good example of a guy who knows how to spot these companies is Michael Hypholdt. Check out Regulær invest. It's doing well.
- 1 päivä sitten1 päivä sittenNordea has an EPS 2026 estimate 1,73 euros. So that offer of DKK 140 has P/E around 10,6. Very low and expecting higher offers closer to DKK 200 with P/E 2026 15-16.·1 päivä sittenSo, do I understand correctly that they will give what corresponds to 155 per share. And if that holds water, then you can forget about anything higher. Otherwise, it probably doesn't make sense.....who would pay more than the price they have to pay for the item 155....that's throwing money away .... unless one considers it like paying at a restaurant +tip. Or there are buyers who want to buy the share at an inflated price and thus throw even more money away.....·1 päivä sittenHave tried to find a more reliable source for the 155 DKK. Must admit...I couldn't. So the price DKK 155 DKK from Apollo is thus - as I see it - currently not confirmed as an official bid. Only rumors - I apologize for having taken it as official. It is probably an expression of market expectations for a higher counter-bid. On the other hand - as you Eläköön also write - an official bid of 140 DKK has been made. If there are no other bids, and it is accepted, there is - if one buys the share at the current daily price - a "possible" gain of 1.60 DKK depending on the share's development, Good luck....
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuI don't own the stock. And I'm considering buying the stock and started looking at the financial statements. (I use Owner Earnings to calculate from). I discover that they have a good business but have a very large debt, which ruins their financial statements. In 2025, Net Income is negative by a good 13 million euro. But the business itself is good.......the debt sends them to the mat :-( In million euro, the overall calculation is: - Interest expenses -27.6 (Nilfisk's total debt is 505.4 million EUR) - Net Income:-13.4 Sustainable Operating Income: 25 million (only remains positive due to depreciation/amortization). - Net Debt/EBITDA ratio: And almost all EBITDA goes to interest. The result was that operations (EBIT) (their core business) itself generates a profit of +28.3 million euro, and the core business can just cover operating costs and generate a positive profit, but debt eats EVERYTHING. In other words, Nilfisk is in a dangerous predicament: - They have a good business (EBIT) that makes money. - but debt ruins an otherwise healthy business. So there is no future for investment here....for me, that is. BUT, then I suddenly discover that they "might" be acquired by Apollo (unless there's something I haven't seen). Now it becomes interesting to see what Nilfisk is actually worth. And what will be paid for the company and what that is in relation to the current share price. Apollo certainly doesn't use the Owner Earnings method, but looks at how many times they pay for Nilfisk's earnings (EBITDA) and revenue in relation to comparable companies (Peers). They are buying the whole of Nilfisk, which includes both shareholder value (market capitalization) and Nilfisk's enormous debt. This corresponds to Enterprise Value (EV) = Market Capitalization + Net Debt) And Market Capitalization = 4,154 million DKK (155 DKK/share × 26.8 million shares) + Net Debt = 3,522 Enterprise Value thus becomes = 7,676 million DKK They will ultimately offer the equivalent of 155 DKK per share to the shareholders A high price, but they are probably paying for the potential, where they might look at Nilfisk's positive operating result (EBIT) and "believe/think" they can solve the debt and efficiency problems. I haven't been in any debate and there has probably been a lot of talk about the acquisition... apologies if so. At this moment, I would say that one can earn - per share - the difference between the current price minus 155 per share. Fair winds.......
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
91 424
Myynti
Määrä
10 030
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 603 | - | - | ||
| 14 | - | - | ||
| 406 | - | - | ||
| 505 | - | - | ||
| 150 | - | - |
Ylin
139VWAP
Alin
138,2VaihtoMäärä
26,4 190 765
VWAP
Ylin
139Alin
138,2VaihtoMäärä
26,4 190 765
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt