Q2-osavuosiraportti
58 päivää sitten‧56 min
0,69 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 10.10.
6,31 %
Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
300
Myynti
Määrä
20
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
44,41VWAP
Alin
43,86VaihtoMäärä
301,9 12 027 497
VWAP
Ylin
44,41Alin
43,86VaihtoMäärä
301,9 12 027 497
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 21.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.7. | |
| 2025 Yhtiökokous | 22.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.4. | |
| 2024 Vuosiraportti | 12.2. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 24.1. |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
31.8.·Hi, what do you think, is it profitable to own foreign companies that pay dividends, when there is almost 50% in tax (both withholding tax and Norwegian tax) or would you rather go for Norwegian companies?
2 päivää sitten·In Norway, the assessed value was only a fraction of the real value of shares. Shares listed on the OTC were almost zero. And we had no dividend tax at all. But then we got a bourgeois government led by the Christian People's Party. A party with around 5% got the Prime Minister, and the Conservative Party, a party with about 25%, got the Minister of Finance. These together with the Farmer's Party formed a government. They all claim in their party programs that they are pro-business. We had a tax regime that was almost untouched since Gerhardsen with 0 tax on dividends. But the Conservative Party's Minister of Finance suddenly got it into his head to start tampering with this. The result is that every damn government since has increased the tax burden on dividends. Now it is 38.7%. And you can almost forget about writing off losses. Because what you can write off is the interest rate that you get in the bank at any given time. Is it any wonder that people are fleeing the country. If you include VAT of 25% on almost everything you buy, the state ends up with well over half of the money for the people!
24.6.·Is there a Swede who is the boss of Verizon?
11.3.·Verizon warned that its subscriber growth in the first quarter is likely to be “weak” due to strong competition from rivals that are luring customers with promotions. The move sent the stock down 5.3% in premarket trading.  After a promotional quarter in December, Verizon has pulled back on customer offers while rivals continued their promotions, intensifying competition, Chief Revenue Officer Frank Boulben said at Deutsche Bank’s Media, Internet & Telecom Conference. In a saturated market, U.S. carriers have relied on incentives in a fierce battle for customers, boosting subscriber growth but also raising concerns about profits. Shares in Verizon rival AT&T fell 4.5% as it also saw increased subscriber churn in January, while T-Mobile US fell 2.1%. Verizon also saw a “slow start” to phone upgrades in the first quarter, suggesting customers are continuing to hold off on purchases due to growing concerns about the U.S. economy. Still, the company expects to add more wireless subscribers with monthly bills in 2025 than the roughly 900,000 it added last year as it takes advantage of its customizable myPlan. Verizon doesn’t expect a big impact from U.S. immigration restrictions. “We expect a very limited impact on the postpaid side, where customers have to show some form of identification to get a contract. So if there’s any impact, we’ll see it at the lower end of the prepaid market,” Boulben said.- 7.3.·52 week high. On track towards $50.
- 6.3.·Verizon Communications faces both risks and opportunities in the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)’s consideration of its $2 billion contract. One of the biggest risks to Verizon is the financial loss that would result if the FAA chose to terminate the contract or reallocate the work to SpaceX. Such a loss would not only impact the company’s financial position but also its position in the marketplace. In addition, SpaceX’s involvement in the work could reduce Verizon’s competitive advantage, as SpaceX may gain a larger role in future contracts related to information technology upgrades. There is also a potential reputational risk to Verizon. The FAA’s decision could create public debate about conflicts of interest, especially since Elon Musk’s close ties to the U.S. President could raise suspicions of political influence over the decision. This could damage the reputations of both SpaceX and Verizon. If the FAA chose to reallocate the work, it could also create uncertainty and disruption to Verizon’s operational plans, which could lead to increased costs and complexity in their resource allocation. On the positive side, if the FAA decides to continue working with Verizon, even if some of the work goes to SpaceX, it could allow Verizon to maintain a portion of the contract and continue to position itself in the information technology and telecommunications market. It could also lead to long-term partnerships with the FAA and open up future contracts. Continuing to work together will also strengthen Verizon’s technological position, and if they manage to handle the situation effectively, they can demonstrate their ability to collaborate across companies, which could be an advantage in future government procurements. Finally, if Verizon handles the situation well, they can build a positive reputation for navigating a complex decision-making process, which could benefit the company in the long term. Overall, Verizon faces both significant risks and interesting opportunities in light of the FAA’s decision, and how they respond to the situation will have a major impact on their future development.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q2-osavuosiraportti
58 päivää sitten‧56 min
0,69 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 10.10.
6,31 %
Tuotto/v
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 31.8.·Hi, what do you think, is it profitable to own foreign companies that pay dividends, when there is almost 50% in tax (both withholding tax and Norwegian tax) or would you rather go for Norwegian companies?2 päivää sitten·In Norway, the assessed value was only a fraction of the real value of shares. Shares listed on the OTC were almost zero. And we had no dividend tax at all. But then we got a bourgeois government led by the Christian People's Party. A party with around 5% got the Prime Minister, and the Conservative Party, a party with about 25%, got the Minister of Finance. These together with the Farmer's Party formed a government. They all claim in their party programs that they are pro-business. We had a tax regime that was almost untouched since Gerhardsen with 0 tax on dividends. But the Conservative Party's Minister of Finance suddenly got it into his head to start tampering with this. The result is that every damn government since has increased the tax burden on dividends. Now it is 38.7%. And you can almost forget about writing off losses. Because what you can write off is the interest rate that you get in the bank at any given time. Is it any wonder that people are fleeing the country. If you include VAT of 25% on almost everything you buy, the state ends up with well over half of the money for the people!
- 24.6.·Is there a Swede who is the boss of Verizon?
- 11.3.·Verizon warned that its subscriber growth in the first quarter is likely to be “weak” due to strong competition from rivals that are luring customers with promotions. The move sent the stock down 5.3% in premarket trading.  After a promotional quarter in December, Verizon has pulled back on customer offers while rivals continued their promotions, intensifying competition, Chief Revenue Officer Frank Boulben said at Deutsche Bank’s Media, Internet & Telecom Conference. In a saturated market, U.S. carriers have relied on incentives in a fierce battle for customers, boosting subscriber growth but also raising concerns about profits. Shares in Verizon rival AT&T fell 4.5% as it also saw increased subscriber churn in January, while T-Mobile US fell 2.1%. Verizon also saw a “slow start” to phone upgrades in the first quarter, suggesting customers are continuing to hold off on purchases due to growing concerns about the U.S. economy. Still, the company expects to add more wireless subscribers with monthly bills in 2025 than the roughly 900,000 it added last year as it takes advantage of its customizable myPlan. Verizon doesn’t expect a big impact from U.S. immigration restrictions. “We expect a very limited impact on the postpaid side, where customers have to show some form of identification to get a contract. So if there’s any impact, we’ll see it at the lower end of the prepaid market,” Boulben said.
- 7.3.·52 week high. On track towards $50.
- 6.3.·Verizon Communications faces both risks and opportunities in the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)’s consideration of its $2 billion contract. One of the biggest risks to Verizon is the financial loss that would result if the FAA chose to terminate the contract or reallocate the work to SpaceX. Such a loss would not only impact the company’s financial position but also its position in the marketplace. In addition, SpaceX’s involvement in the work could reduce Verizon’s competitive advantage, as SpaceX may gain a larger role in future contracts related to information technology upgrades. There is also a potential reputational risk to Verizon. The FAA’s decision could create public debate about conflicts of interest, especially since Elon Musk’s close ties to the U.S. President could raise suspicions of political influence over the decision. This could damage the reputations of both SpaceX and Verizon. If the FAA chose to reallocate the work, it could also create uncertainty and disruption to Verizon’s operational plans, which could lead to increased costs and complexity in their resource allocation. On the positive side, if the FAA decides to continue working with Verizon, even if some of the work goes to SpaceX, it could allow Verizon to maintain a portion of the contract and continue to position itself in the information technology and telecommunications market. It could also lead to long-term partnerships with the FAA and open up future contracts. Continuing to work together will also strengthen Verizon’s technological position, and if they manage to handle the situation effectively, they can demonstrate their ability to collaborate across companies, which could be an advantage in future government procurements. Finally, if Verizon handles the situation well, they can build a positive reputation for navigating a complex decision-making process, which could benefit the company in the long term. Overall, Verizon faces both significant risks and interesting opportunities in light of the FAA’s decision, and how they respond to the situation will have a major impact on their future development.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
300
Myynti
Määrä
20
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
44,41VWAP
Alin
43,86VaihtoMäärä
301,9 12 027 497
VWAP
Ylin
44,41Alin
43,86VaihtoMäärä
301,9 12 027 497
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 21.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.7. | |
| 2025 Yhtiökokous | 22.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.4. | |
| 2024 Vuosiraportti | 12.2. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 24.1. |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
Q2-osavuosiraportti
58 päivää sitten‧56 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 21.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.7. | |
| 2025 Yhtiökokous | 22.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.4. | |
| 2024 Vuosiraportti | 12.2. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 24.1. |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
0,69 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 10.10.
6,31 %
Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 31.8.·Hi, what do you think, is it profitable to own foreign companies that pay dividends, when there is almost 50% in tax (both withholding tax and Norwegian tax) or would you rather go for Norwegian companies?2 päivää sitten·In Norway, the assessed value was only a fraction of the real value of shares. Shares listed on the OTC were almost zero. And we had no dividend tax at all. But then we got a bourgeois government led by the Christian People's Party. A party with around 5% got the Prime Minister, and the Conservative Party, a party with about 25%, got the Minister of Finance. These together with the Farmer's Party formed a government. They all claim in their party programs that they are pro-business. We had a tax regime that was almost untouched since Gerhardsen with 0 tax on dividends. But the Conservative Party's Minister of Finance suddenly got it into his head to start tampering with this. The result is that every damn government since has increased the tax burden on dividends. Now it is 38.7%. And you can almost forget about writing off losses. Because what you can write off is the interest rate that you get in the bank at any given time. Is it any wonder that people are fleeing the country. If you include VAT of 25% on almost everything you buy, the state ends up with well over half of the money for the people!
- 24.6.·Is there a Swede who is the boss of Verizon?
- 11.3.·Verizon warned that its subscriber growth in the first quarter is likely to be “weak” due to strong competition from rivals that are luring customers with promotions. The move sent the stock down 5.3% in premarket trading.  After a promotional quarter in December, Verizon has pulled back on customer offers while rivals continued their promotions, intensifying competition, Chief Revenue Officer Frank Boulben said at Deutsche Bank’s Media, Internet & Telecom Conference. In a saturated market, U.S. carriers have relied on incentives in a fierce battle for customers, boosting subscriber growth but also raising concerns about profits. Shares in Verizon rival AT&T fell 4.5% as it also saw increased subscriber churn in January, while T-Mobile US fell 2.1%. Verizon also saw a “slow start” to phone upgrades in the first quarter, suggesting customers are continuing to hold off on purchases due to growing concerns about the U.S. economy. Still, the company expects to add more wireless subscribers with monthly bills in 2025 than the roughly 900,000 it added last year as it takes advantage of its customizable myPlan. Verizon doesn’t expect a big impact from U.S. immigration restrictions. “We expect a very limited impact on the postpaid side, where customers have to show some form of identification to get a contract. So if there’s any impact, we’ll see it at the lower end of the prepaid market,” Boulben said.
- 7.3.·52 week high. On track towards $50.
- 6.3.·Verizon Communications faces both risks and opportunities in the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)’s consideration of its $2 billion contract. One of the biggest risks to Verizon is the financial loss that would result if the FAA chose to terminate the contract or reallocate the work to SpaceX. Such a loss would not only impact the company’s financial position but also its position in the marketplace. In addition, SpaceX’s involvement in the work could reduce Verizon’s competitive advantage, as SpaceX may gain a larger role in future contracts related to information technology upgrades. There is also a potential reputational risk to Verizon. The FAA’s decision could create public debate about conflicts of interest, especially since Elon Musk’s close ties to the U.S. President could raise suspicions of political influence over the decision. This could damage the reputations of both SpaceX and Verizon. If the FAA chose to reallocate the work, it could also create uncertainty and disruption to Verizon’s operational plans, which could lead to increased costs and complexity in their resource allocation. On the positive side, if the FAA decides to continue working with Verizon, even if some of the work goes to SpaceX, it could allow Verizon to maintain a portion of the contract and continue to position itself in the information technology and telecommunications market. It could also lead to long-term partnerships with the FAA and open up future contracts. Continuing to work together will also strengthen Verizon’s technological position, and if they manage to handle the situation effectively, they can demonstrate their ability to collaborate across companies, which could be an advantage in future government procurements. Finally, if Verizon handles the situation well, they can build a positive reputation for navigating a complex decision-making process, which could benefit the company in the long term. Overall, Verizon faces both significant risks and interesting opportunities in light of the FAA’s decision, and how they respond to the situation will have a major impact on their future development.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
300
Myynti
Määrä
20
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
44,41VWAP
Alin
43,86VaihtoMäärä
301,9 12 027 497
VWAP
Ylin
44,41Alin
43,86VaihtoMäärä
301,9 12 027 497
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt