2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
54 päivää sitten1 t 52 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
170,67VWAP
Alin
163,69VaihtoMäärä
3 193,6 19 234 491
VWAP
Ylin
170,67Alin
163,69VaihtoMäärä
3 193,6 19 234 491
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 3.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 30.10. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 31.7. | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 12.6. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 1.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·19 t sittenDisappointing that we shareholders have now lost 13,656 bitcoins this quarter. There is no difference from selling bitcoins and diluting shareholders in the way he is doing now. On the other hand, it allows them to endure a potential bear market 3 years into the future, even though one must remember their ordinary debt, which will either have to be paid or converted in 2027, 2028 etc. I am a shareholder myself, but fundamentally believe that his preferred strategy has been a huge mistake. He should have stuck to ATM only, then the risk would be smaller. Unfortunately, he didn't understand that. While he stuck to this strategy, he could find a long-term way to make money on them instead of having to pay money out. Why change a strategy that already worked? He has used AI to create the new strategy, and AI sometimes hallucinates and does not take reality into account. I am still a shareholder, but am very skeptical of the preferred strategy. It seems that right now it is preferred shareholders who are winning. In the long run, however, they will also lose if MSTR loses.·6 t sittenIt's funny that you say that preferreds do not cause any dilution. Out of the total 8 trillion preferred, in just 3 weeks they have diluted us for over 2 trillion to pay them. So effectively we have only received 5.1 trillion from preferred right now. That is peanuts. If they had sold the same number of shares as they have sold now, but when the price was 350-450, then we would have received twice as much money for the dilution, which they could have used to buy bitcoin. So all the shares they have diluted us for now to pay preferred, could have brought in just 4 trillion. That shows how effective ATM is compared to the headache with preferred. I don't understand that you can't see it? Far fewer risks, less complexity and generally just a better balance sheet.
·19 t sitten · MuokattuThoughts on USD inflow, the stated goal is 24 months of coverage. Now there are almost 32. There has been talk of a product (dollar-based stable coin) with 8% interest created by the bank, which is to yield 8% interest per year and is backed by STRC which yields 10% interest and can balance changes in the dollar's value over the year. Will these 540 million be used for more BTC or to expand STRC? If they had wanted two years of coverage, they could create STRC for 2.7 billion dollars (27 million shares). Then they can buy 30000 BTC with the money they get in for stretch.
·18 t sittenWhat Michael Saylor said in the last interview with intangeblecoins was that MSTR is not able to stabilize STRC 100% to $100. The banks must step in there, use STRC as a base, add 10-20% liquidity and with that offer accounts that can give approx 8% return without the residual volatility of STRC.
·20 t sittenI think the retirement savings account needs to be topped up a bit. Let's go! :)
·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuI am curious if there is a realistic scenario where BTC in 5 or 10 years is at the level of 250,000–1,000,000 USD, but where MSTR nevertheless remains stuck in the range of 100–400 USD. Can the price get stuck in any way due to shorts, low mNAV or something else I haven't thought of? I am especially thinking that Strategy continuously issues new shares to buy more BTC, often when the price is high. (And yes, I know you get more BTC per share, which is great. ) Asking purely out of curiosity. I am a long-term holder myself, currently sitting on a decent unrealized loss, but still see great potential in the long run and continuously buy more.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
54 päivää sitten1 t 52 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·19 t sittenDisappointing that we shareholders have now lost 13,656 bitcoins this quarter. There is no difference from selling bitcoins and diluting shareholders in the way he is doing now. On the other hand, it allows them to endure a potential bear market 3 years into the future, even though one must remember their ordinary debt, which will either have to be paid or converted in 2027, 2028 etc. I am a shareholder myself, but fundamentally believe that his preferred strategy has been a huge mistake. He should have stuck to ATM only, then the risk would be smaller. Unfortunately, he didn't understand that. While he stuck to this strategy, he could find a long-term way to make money on them instead of having to pay money out. Why change a strategy that already worked? He has used AI to create the new strategy, and AI sometimes hallucinates and does not take reality into account. I am still a shareholder, but am very skeptical of the preferred strategy. It seems that right now it is preferred shareholders who are winning. In the long run, however, they will also lose if MSTR loses.·6 t sittenIt's funny that you say that preferreds do not cause any dilution. Out of the total 8 trillion preferred, in just 3 weeks they have diluted us for over 2 trillion to pay them. So effectively we have only received 5.1 trillion from preferred right now. That is peanuts. If they had sold the same number of shares as they have sold now, but when the price was 350-450, then we would have received twice as much money for the dilution, which they could have used to buy bitcoin. So all the shares they have diluted us for now to pay preferred, could have brought in just 4 trillion. That shows how effective ATM is compared to the headache with preferred. I don't understand that you can't see it? Far fewer risks, less complexity and generally just a better balance sheet.
- ·19 t sitten · MuokattuThoughts on USD inflow, the stated goal is 24 months of coverage. Now there are almost 32. There has been talk of a product (dollar-based stable coin) with 8% interest created by the bank, which is to yield 8% interest per year and is backed by STRC which yields 10% interest and can balance changes in the dollar's value over the year. Will these 540 million be used for more BTC or to expand STRC? If they had wanted two years of coverage, they could create STRC for 2.7 billion dollars (27 million shares). Then they can buy 30000 BTC with the money they get in for stretch.·18 t sittenWhat Michael Saylor said in the last interview with intangeblecoins was that MSTR is not able to stabilize STRC 100% to $100. The banks must step in there, use STRC as a base, add 10-20% liquidity and with that offer accounts that can give approx 8% return without the residual volatility of STRC.
- ·20 t sittenI think the retirement savings account needs to be topped up a bit. Let's go! :)
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuI am curious if there is a realistic scenario where BTC in 5 or 10 years is at the level of 250,000–1,000,000 USD, but where MSTR nevertheless remains stuck in the range of 100–400 USD. Can the price get stuck in any way due to shorts, low mNAV or something else I haven't thought of? I am especially thinking that Strategy continuously issues new shares to buy more BTC, often when the price is high. (And yes, I know you get more BTC per share, which is great. ) Asking purely out of curiosity. I am a long-term holder myself, currently sitting on a decent unrealized loss, but still see great potential in the long run and continuously buy more.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
170,67VWAP
Alin
163,69VaihtoMäärä
3 193,6 19 234 491
VWAP
Ylin
170,67Alin
163,69VaihtoMäärä
3 193,6 19 234 491
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 3.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 30.10. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 31.7. | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 12.6. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 1.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
54 päivää sitten1 t 52 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 3.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 30.10. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 31.7. | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 12.6. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 1.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·19 t sittenDisappointing that we shareholders have now lost 13,656 bitcoins this quarter. There is no difference from selling bitcoins and diluting shareholders in the way he is doing now. On the other hand, it allows them to endure a potential bear market 3 years into the future, even though one must remember their ordinary debt, which will either have to be paid or converted in 2027, 2028 etc. I am a shareholder myself, but fundamentally believe that his preferred strategy has been a huge mistake. He should have stuck to ATM only, then the risk would be smaller. Unfortunately, he didn't understand that. While he stuck to this strategy, he could find a long-term way to make money on them instead of having to pay money out. Why change a strategy that already worked? He has used AI to create the new strategy, and AI sometimes hallucinates and does not take reality into account. I am still a shareholder, but am very skeptical of the preferred strategy. It seems that right now it is preferred shareholders who are winning. In the long run, however, they will also lose if MSTR loses.·6 t sittenIt's funny that you say that preferreds do not cause any dilution. Out of the total 8 trillion preferred, in just 3 weeks they have diluted us for over 2 trillion to pay them. So effectively we have only received 5.1 trillion from preferred right now. That is peanuts. If they had sold the same number of shares as they have sold now, but when the price was 350-450, then we would have received twice as much money for the dilution, which they could have used to buy bitcoin. So all the shares they have diluted us for now to pay preferred, could have brought in just 4 trillion. That shows how effective ATM is compared to the headache with preferred. I don't understand that you can't see it? Far fewer risks, less complexity and generally just a better balance sheet.
- ·19 t sitten · MuokattuThoughts on USD inflow, the stated goal is 24 months of coverage. Now there are almost 32. There has been talk of a product (dollar-based stable coin) with 8% interest created by the bank, which is to yield 8% interest per year and is backed by STRC which yields 10% interest and can balance changes in the dollar's value over the year. Will these 540 million be used for more BTC or to expand STRC? If they had wanted two years of coverage, they could create STRC for 2.7 billion dollars (27 million shares). Then they can buy 30000 BTC with the money they get in for stretch.·18 t sittenWhat Michael Saylor said in the last interview with intangeblecoins was that MSTR is not able to stabilize STRC 100% to $100. The banks must step in there, use STRC as a base, add 10-20% liquidity and with that offer accounts that can give approx 8% return without the residual volatility of STRC.
- ·20 t sittenI think the retirement savings account needs to be topped up a bit. Let's go! :)
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuI am curious if there is a realistic scenario where BTC in 5 or 10 years is at the level of 250,000–1,000,000 USD, but where MSTR nevertheless remains stuck in the range of 100–400 USD. Can the price get stuck in any way due to shorts, low mNAV or something else I haven't thought of? I am especially thinking that Strategy continuously issues new shares to buy more BTC, often when the price is high. (And yes, I know you get more BTC per share, which is great. ) Asking purely out of curiosity. I am a long-term holder myself, currently sitting on a decent unrealized loss, but still see great potential in the long run and continuously buy more.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
170,67VWAP
Alin
163,69VaihtoMäärä
3 193,6 19 234 491
VWAP
Ylin
170,67Alin
163,69VaihtoMäärä
3 193,6 19 234 491
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt