Q3-osavuosiraportti
8 päivää sitten‧1 t
0,12 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 31.10.
14,13 %
Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
112
Myynti
Määrä
996
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
10,27VWAP
Alin
10,04VaihtoMäärä
202,6 28 630 461
VWAP
Ylin
10,27Alin
10,04VaihtoMäärä
202,6 28 630 461
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 21.10. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 22.7. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.7. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.4. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 21.4. |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
22.10.·14.26% in direct return, is that right?
15.10.·I'm considering it primarily for the dividend. Does anyone know if there is a difference in the dividend here at Nordnet versus having the share in a share savings account at your own bank?
21.10.·so what you are saying is that agnc is the smartest to buy in a general deposit with an associated currency account? I have an almost full share savings account of 145,000 kr and a 10 year outlook and want to enjoy my dividends, should I buy in a share savings account or general deposit? or retirement pension
23.10.23.10.Indeed, according to my own approach, I’m the kind of investor who prefers to avoid paying tax on unrealised gains, especially when most of my positions are long-term dividend holds. Here’s why: 1. The stocks I buy are meant to generate income, not constant trading gains. If I see a sudden 10% spike within a week of buying, I might take profit — because that’s often just short-term momentum. Usually, I can re-enter later at a lower price and sometimes even catch the ex-dividend day in the process. 2. I don’t mind holding a quality stock “in the red” for months or even a year or two, as long as it keeps paying dividends and fundamentals remain intact. For example, Coca-Cola might only yield 3%, but it’s defensive and always recovers. Strong companies give you patience. With AGNC, it’s a bit different. The dividend is huge and the risk moderate-to-high — not because the company is bad, but because its business model relies on interest spreads. It’s sustainable enough, but not comparable to a mega-cap like KO. Personally, I treat a 5–10% dip as a Black Friday discount, not necessarily a red flag. If the drop is due to general market panic or a temporary earnings miss, I’ll often DCA to average down. It shortens the road to recovery. Of course, I’ve also learned the hard way to avoid yield traps — that’s why research måtter. And sometimes, you just cant predict correctly... But if I do 75-85% of the time, and spread my allocations accordingly, my losing positions will be leveled out by the winning ones. (i.e. Dont put 50% of your AOP in AGNC, always balance it with more safe bets like coca cola and pfizer, for instance... If one of four positions turns out to be a disaster, the three good ones will save the day anyway.) So, AGNC going down 8% in a year would suck, but at least the 15% return will cover the loss. And I will probably have bought more, so I get them at maybe 10% discount and still generate even more dividents at a lower GAV. And since I keep My positions balanced, the AOP of AGNC normally would remain within my comfort zone... For example, I might have a note saying to keep the AOP within 5-10%. So when makinh an entry on AGNC at 10,30 usd, I will do so at 5% AOP because I feel it is probably 60-75% likely that a dca buy around 9-9,5 usd is likely within a year or two. The reason for not waiting with the entry is simply that I dont want to risk "missing the train", if 10 usd turns out to be the new permanent lowest support (ie. the 25-40% in My hypothethical risk assesment, if that makes sense?). An as mentioned, I will still feel that I win by getting 6-12 months of insane 15% annual payout. And that wont stop just because I have a hypothethical short term loss. So when buying more, I repair some of the hypothethical loss by buying at 9 usd. So when it bounces back to 9,5 or 10 usd I AM back in the green even excluding the dividends that (hopefully) just keep on coming. For this reason I always make sure the stock has been paying out dividends consistently for at least 5-15 years before deciding my level of commitment. For example, if it has stopped paying dividends in years 2012, 13, and 22-23... I would surely think twice about making an entry (or at least how big of an AOP it should be at risk wise - Unless other factors make me convinced that it is a good move of course. Sometimes it is just a sign of a healthy strategy rather than a weakness. Now, back to the main point: about ASK vs. AKT (Stock Savings vs. General Account). Most of my dividend stocks are long-term holds, not high-volatility trades. They move ±5–10% yearly, and there’s rarely a reason to sell in between. So being taxed every single year on unrealised gains makes little sense to me — especially when one year’s +5% can easily become –5% the next. If I hold for 10 years and end up +50%, I’d rather pay the tax once upon selling (AKT) rather than paying 17% yearly on imaginary growth that might never fully materialise. It feels like taxing a shop for the potential profit of 1000 pairs of shoes before they’re sold — and if those shoes go out of fashion, the shop doesn’t get the prepaid tax back. Even for active traders, I believe AKT offers more control and flexibility. ASK fits index funds better, because those are 80–90% likely to yield a stable 5–10% annual return without major drawdowns — that can’t be said for most individual dividend stocks. So for me, AGNC (and similar income-focused positions) make more sense on a general account (AKT) where tax is paid only on realised gains and dividends. But of course — every investor’s comfort level is different. I just prefer knowing exactly what I’m taxed on, when it happens, and why. It makes things feel more reliable, and being both slightly autistic and having strong ADHD, I need a certain degree of reliability in my life :) and going by calculated risks and foreseeable taxation surely gives me just that. Hope that helps, just ask if I am being unclear.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q3-osavuosiraportti
8 päivää sitten‧1 t
0,12 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 31.10.
14,13 %
Tuotto/v
Uutiset ja analyysit
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 22.10.·14.26% in direct return, is that right?
- 15.10.·I'm considering it primarily for the dividend. Does anyone know if there is a difference in the dividend here at Nordnet versus having the share in a share savings account at your own bank?21.10.·so what you are saying is that agnc is the smartest to buy in a general deposit with an associated currency account? I have an almost full share savings account of 145,000 kr and a 10 year outlook and want to enjoy my dividends, should I buy in a share savings account or general deposit? or retirement pension23.10.23.10.Indeed, according to my own approach, I’m the kind of investor who prefers to avoid paying tax on unrealised gains, especially when most of my positions are long-term dividend holds. Here’s why: 1. The stocks I buy are meant to generate income, not constant trading gains. If I see a sudden 10% spike within a week of buying, I might take profit — because that’s often just short-term momentum. Usually, I can re-enter later at a lower price and sometimes even catch the ex-dividend day in the process. 2. I don’t mind holding a quality stock “in the red” for months or even a year or two, as long as it keeps paying dividends and fundamentals remain intact. For example, Coca-Cola might only yield 3%, but it’s defensive and always recovers. Strong companies give you patience. With AGNC, it’s a bit different. The dividend is huge and the risk moderate-to-high — not because the company is bad, but because its business model relies on interest spreads. It’s sustainable enough, but not comparable to a mega-cap like KO. Personally, I treat a 5–10% dip as a Black Friday discount, not necessarily a red flag. If the drop is due to general market panic or a temporary earnings miss, I’ll often DCA to average down. It shortens the road to recovery. Of course, I’ve also learned the hard way to avoid yield traps — that’s why research måtter. And sometimes, you just cant predict correctly... But if I do 75-85% of the time, and spread my allocations accordingly, my losing positions will be leveled out by the winning ones. (i.e. Dont put 50% of your AOP in AGNC, always balance it with more safe bets like coca cola and pfizer, for instance... If one of four positions turns out to be a disaster, the three good ones will save the day anyway.) So, AGNC going down 8% in a year would suck, but at least the 15% return will cover the loss. And I will probably have bought more, so I get them at maybe 10% discount and still generate even more dividents at a lower GAV. And since I keep My positions balanced, the AOP of AGNC normally would remain within my comfort zone... For example, I might have a note saying to keep the AOP within 5-10%. So when makinh an entry on AGNC at 10,30 usd, I will do so at 5% AOP because I feel it is probably 60-75% likely that a dca buy around 9-9,5 usd is likely within a year or two. The reason for not waiting with the entry is simply that I dont want to risk "missing the train", if 10 usd turns out to be the new permanent lowest support (ie. the 25-40% in My hypothethical risk assesment, if that makes sense?). An as mentioned, I will still feel that I win by getting 6-12 months of insane 15% annual payout. And that wont stop just because I have a hypothethical short term loss. So when buying more, I repair some of the hypothethical loss by buying at 9 usd. So when it bounces back to 9,5 or 10 usd I AM back in the green even excluding the dividends that (hopefully) just keep on coming. For this reason I always make sure the stock has been paying out dividends consistently for at least 5-15 years before deciding my level of commitment. For example, if it has stopped paying dividends in years 2012, 13, and 22-23... I would surely think twice about making an entry (or at least how big of an AOP it should be at risk wise - Unless other factors make me convinced that it is a good move of course. Sometimes it is just a sign of a healthy strategy rather than a weakness. Now, back to the main point: about ASK vs. AKT (Stock Savings vs. General Account). Most of my dividend stocks are long-term holds, not high-volatility trades. They move ±5–10% yearly, and there’s rarely a reason to sell in between. So being taxed every single year on unrealised gains makes little sense to me — especially when one year’s +5% can easily become –5% the next. If I hold for 10 years and end up +50%, I’d rather pay the tax once upon selling (AKT) rather than paying 17% yearly on imaginary growth that might never fully materialise. It feels like taxing a shop for the potential profit of 1000 pairs of shoes before they’re sold — and if those shoes go out of fashion, the shop doesn’t get the prepaid tax back. Even for active traders, I believe AKT offers more control and flexibility. ASK fits index funds better, because those are 80–90% likely to yield a stable 5–10% annual return without major drawdowns — that can’t be said for most individual dividend stocks. So for me, AGNC (and similar income-focused positions) make more sense on a general account (AKT) where tax is paid only on realised gains and dividends. But of course — every investor’s comfort level is different. I just prefer knowing exactly what I’m taxed on, when it happens, and why. It makes things feel more reliable, and being both slightly autistic and having strong ADHD, I need a certain degree of reliability in my life :) and going by calculated risks and foreseeable taxation surely gives me just that. Hope that helps, just ask if I am being unclear.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
112
Myynti
Määrä
996
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
10,27VWAP
Alin
10,04VaihtoMäärä
202,6 28 630 461
VWAP
Ylin
10,27Alin
10,04VaihtoMäärä
202,6 28 630 461
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 21.10. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 22.7. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.7. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.4. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 21.4. |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
Q3-osavuosiraportti
8 päivää sitten‧1 t
Uutiset ja analyysit
Ei uutisia tällä hetkellä
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 21.10. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 22.7. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.7. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.4. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 21.4. |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
0,12 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 31.10.
14,13 %
Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 22.10.·14.26% in direct return, is that right?
- 15.10.·I'm considering it primarily for the dividend. Does anyone know if there is a difference in the dividend here at Nordnet versus having the share in a share savings account at your own bank?21.10.·so what you are saying is that agnc is the smartest to buy in a general deposit with an associated currency account? I have an almost full share savings account of 145,000 kr and a 10 year outlook and want to enjoy my dividends, should I buy in a share savings account or general deposit? or retirement pension23.10.23.10.Indeed, according to my own approach, I’m the kind of investor who prefers to avoid paying tax on unrealised gains, especially when most of my positions are long-term dividend holds. Here’s why: 1. The stocks I buy are meant to generate income, not constant trading gains. If I see a sudden 10% spike within a week of buying, I might take profit — because that’s often just short-term momentum. Usually, I can re-enter later at a lower price and sometimes even catch the ex-dividend day in the process. 2. I don’t mind holding a quality stock “in the red” for months or even a year or two, as long as it keeps paying dividends and fundamentals remain intact. For example, Coca-Cola might only yield 3%, but it’s defensive and always recovers. Strong companies give you patience. With AGNC, it’s a bit different. The dividend is huge and the risk moderate-to-high — not because the company is bad, but because its business model relies on interest spreads. It’s sustainable enough, but not comparable to a mega-cap like KO. Personally, I treat a 5–10% dip as a Black Friday discount, not necessarily a red flag. If the drop is due to general market panic or a temporary earnings miss, I’ll often DCA to average down. It shortens the road to recovery. Of course, I’ve also learned the hard way to avoid yield traps — that’s why research måtter. And sometimes, you just cant predict correctly... But if I do 75-85% of the time, and spread my allocations accordingly, my losing positions will be leveled out by the winning ones. (i.e. Dont put 50% of your AOP in AGNC, always balance it with more safe bets like coca cola and pfizer, for instance... If one of four positions turns out to be a disaster, the three good ones will save the day anyway.) So, AGNC going down 8% in a year would suck, but at least the 15% return will cover the loss. And I will probably have bought more, so I get them at maybe 10% discount and still generate even more dividents at a lower GAV. And since I keep My positions balanced, the AOP of AGNC normally would remain within my comfort zone... For example, I might have a note saying to keep the AOP within 5-10%. So when makinh an entry on AGNC at 10,30 usd, I will do so at 5% AOP because I feel it is probably 60-75% likely that a dca buy around 9-9,5 usd is likely within a year or two. The reason for not waiting with the entry is simply that I dont want to risk "missing the train", if 10 usd turns out to be the new permanent lowest support (ie. the 25-40% in My hypothethical risk assesment, if that makes sense?). An as mentioned, I will still feel that I win by getting 6-12 months of insane 15% annual payout. And that wont stop just because I have a hypothethical short term loss. So when buying more, I repair some of the hypothethical loss by buying at 9 usd. So when it bounces back to 9,5 or 10 usd I AM back in the green even excluding the dividends that (hopefully) just keep on coming. For this reason I always make sure the stock has been paying out dividends consistently for at least 5-15 years before deciding my level of commitment. For example, if it has stopped paying dividends in years 2012, 13, and 22-23... I would surely think twice about making an entry (or at least how big of an AOP it should be at risk wise - Unless other factors make me convinced that it is a good move of course. Sometimes it is just a sign of a healthy strategy rather than a weakness. Now, back to the main point: about ASK vs. AKT (Stock Savings vs. General Account). Most of my dividend stocks are long-term holds, not high-volatility trades. They move ±5–10% yearly, and there’s rarely a reason to sell in between. So being taxed every single year on unrealised gains makes little sense to me — especially when one year’s +5% can easily become –5% the next. If I hold for 10 years and end up +50%, I’d rather pay the tax once upon selling (AKT) rather than paying 17% yearly on imaginary growth that might never fully materialise. It feels like taxing a shop for the potential profit of 1000 pairs of shoes before they’re sold — and if those shoes go out of fashion, the shop doesn’t get the prepaid tax back. Even for active traders, I believe AKT offers more control and flexibility. ASK fits index funds better, because those are 80–90% likely to yield a stable 5–10% annual return without major drawdowns — that can’t be said for most individual dividend stocks. So for me, AGNC (and similar income-focused positions) make more sense on a general account (AKT) where tax is paid only on realised gains and dividends. But of course — every investor’s comfort level is different. I just prefer knowing exactly what I’m taxed on, when it happens, and why. It makes things feel more reliable, and being both slightly autistic and having strong ADHD, I need a certain degree of reliability in my life :) and going by calculated risks and foreseeable taxation surely gives me just that. Hope that helps, just ask if I am being unclear.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
112
Myynti
Määrä
996
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
10,27VWAP
Alin
10,04VaihtoMäärä
202,6 28 630 461
VWAP
Ylin
10,27Alin
10,04VaihtoMäärä
202,6 28 630 461
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt