Q2-osavuosiraportti
Vain PDF
20 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
First North Denmark
Määrä
Osto
531
Myynti
Määrä
1 654
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 10.3.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 26.8. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 3.4. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 10.3. | |
| 2024 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.8.2024 | |
| 2023 Yhtiökokous | 3.4.2024 |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
21.8. · Muokattu·Upgrading, wonderful. Could be nice with course 5
21.8.·2024 result was shown at EBITDA = 10.4 million. So the upward adjustment must also be seen in light of a conservative guidance to start with. But otherwise it is of course only a positive message.
18.8.·Remember that returns to shareholders and for shipping companies BIG returns are the hallmark of a listed company! - it helps all the way through, also when doing M&A's, partly you get the best out of them, but it also becomes easier to create financing! - it is one of ERRIA's biggest problems that you have not rewarded your shareholders EVER! - that is not a good signal to send if you want to be a GROWTH COMPANY listed on a GROWTH STOCK EXCHANGE! - It is important to note that on a stock exchange the shareholder is the absolute most important stakeholder! - it is the whole basis of a stock exchange that you can find investors (shareholders) who will support a company with their money - therefore RETURN always comes first if you want to be listed on a stock exchange and have the unique opportunity it provides to finance your company and the ideas you may have! - if you don't want to and that's fine with me - but then you shouldn't be listed on a stock exchange, especially a growth stock exchange, then you have to find another way to raise capital and there are many who do that with great success!- 7.8.·If you hadn't made that investment in VIETNAM 12 million, of course there would have been a need for a capital injection! - I would also think you could have gotten a loan instead of the injection if you wanted to! - - but that would have been to the benefit of the shareholders! - I don't understand what the plans are - an expansion of the conglomerate strategy, where you use the income from the income-generating elements to cover the costs in the less positive segments! - will it take many more years before the shareholders get a GOOD return on their investment! ?8.8. · Muokattu·Well, it's good that you think it's a good return! - I hope you've sold your shares so you can enjoy the 25%! The people who went in at the time of the IPO and haven't received dividends for many years and haven't sold their shares, and have had to see a historically falling price, may see it a little differently! - they may have a little difficulty understanding that they now have to accept a further dilution of the price in order to continue a strategy that has so obviously been wrong - Previous and long-term investors are of course looking for a return on their investment from the time of the IPO! - i.e. the price should probably be tripled compared to today plus there will be considerable dividends for the next many years before they are quite understandably satisfied - by the way, these are the kind of investors who are the backbone of most companies and perhaps therefore should be treated particularly well! - By the way, we're talking about a share on the growth stock exchange! - it should grow, not just continue according to the old model = I don't think any company should! - NORDIC MARINE and the staff there are probably fine = by letting the company more or less continue instead of immediately integrating the company into the parent company, you are not only signaling that you want to continue the conglomerate model which has DEFINITELY not created OWNER value since the IPO - possibly personnel and management values, but not OWNER values for the shareholders! - it is to get these values that I and many others invest in companies and it is to get a share in our investments that companies are registered on the stock exchange - then you also have to accept that such demands are made on the companies and their management, it's that simple! THE OWNERS are still the most important STAKEHOLDER on the stock exchange! - In other words, I think a new strategy is needed and a replacement and not least an expansion of the board of directors and that the payment for NORDIC MARINE, which is to be immediately integrated, must be made via loan capital with a guarantee in the VIETNAM investment!9.8.·Well, that's how you look at it! - I don't - just like some others - I might even dare to say many others! but fortunately there are many different investors! - otherwise it would look bad for Danish listed companies and workplaces in Denmark! - I believe in the role of ownership and thus the duty to growth, development and change, as the engine of earnings, especially in a disruptive future! - that's why I thought it was a nice remark the new NOVO CEO made about your predecessor when he said FRUERGAARD was the best when he took over as CEO of NOVO - he is no longer - now it was him (the new CEO) who was the best! - In other words, there is of course nothing wrong with FRUERGAARD and the ideas he has or had at the time! - but things change and a company that wants to survive in a disruptive world must constantly change, and therefore you must constantly ensure that you have the best director, board of directors and organization - it is the owners', i.e. In listed companies, the shareholders', task to ensure this, and the way you can constantly monitor whether there is a need for change in listed companies is to follow the price and return! - that is also in my opinion (I have observed it in other companies, so it is not new to me!) what you need in ERRIA, and I could name other companies! - SHAREHOLDERS must, in my opinion, be tough in their demands for return - boards of directors and management must deliver, - or accept that if they cannot deliver, then changes must be made - I clearly support the business philosophy that what was good yesterday may not be good today! - of course, this does not mean that the current management/supervisory boards are suddenly incompetent - they can be perfectly fine just in another place or in another position! - but they just couldn't produce more where they are! - I also just think it's foolish not to take advantage of the opportunity for a larger board when the articles of association allow it and the opportunities are there, - it's the cheapest knowledge capital a company can get! - FIRST NORTH is a growth stock exchange! - ERRIA does not hide that they are a growth company, so I think it's completely wrong to claim that ERRIA is not a growth company. ! = it's a company that doesn't deliver on its promises - that's not good!
7.8.·Exciting with a small acquisition. There is little information about Nordic Marine Partner ApS, but we can inform you that in 2024 the company had a gross profit of DKK 4.6 million with a profit before tax of DKK 1.7 million. The profit grew by a good 20% compared to 2023. There is also little information about how much dilution existing shareholders must accept. It appears that the acquisition does not affect the guidance for 2025. If the company expects the same profit before tax as last year (DKK 1.7 million), then the 4 months should lift the result for the ERRIA group by a small DKK 600k. There are then two options: (1) This amount can be included in the current guidance interval for EBIT of DKK 4-7 million, or (2) ERRIA is behind guidance and the acquired 600k in EBIT will bring them back on track. Finally, I lack an expectation of what the acquisition will contribute on a normalized basis (i.e. on a full-year basis).21.8. · Muokattu·Now there was an upward adjustment: 20% better EBITDA, if you take the middle of the range. Quite nice and impressive. I wonder if the new acquisition will also contribute positively? My option (2) above is therefore now rejected. This suggests that there may be a little more to come when Erria is confident that the new acquisition is well integrated. All in all, very positive. However, I would like them to announce what the acquisition is expected to contribute more explicitly, so that shareholders can see the sense in the dilution.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q2-osavuosiraportti
Vain PDF
20 päivää sitten
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 21.8. · Muokattu·Upgrading, wonderful. Could be nice with course 521.8.·2024 result was shown at EBITDA = 10.4 million. So the upward adjustment must also be seen in light of a conservative guidance to start with. But otherwise it is of course only a positive message.
- 18.8.·Remember that returns to shareholders and for shipping companies BIG returns are the hallmark of a listed company! - it helps all the way through, also when doing M&A's, partly you get the best out of them, but it also becomes easier to create financing! - it is one of ERRIA's biggest problems that you have not rewarded your shareholders EVER! - that is not a good signal to send if you want to be a GROWTH COMPANY listed on a GROWTH STOCK EXCHANGE! - It is important to note that on a stock exchange the shareholder is the absolute most important stakeholder! - it is the whole basis of a stock exchange that you can find investors (shareholders) who will support a company with their money - therefore RETURN always comes first if you want to be listed on a stock exchange and have the unique opportunity it provides to finance your company and the ideas you may have! - if you don't want to and that's fine with me - but then you shouldn't be listed on a stock exchange, especially a growth stock exchange, then you have to find another way to raise capital and there are many who do that with great success!
- 7.8.·If you hadn't made that investment in VIETNAM 12 million, of course there would have been a need for a capital injection! - I would also think you could have gotten a loan instead of the injection if you wanted to! - - but that would have been to the benefit of the shareholders! - I don't understand what the plans are - an expansion of the conglomerate strategy, where you use the income from the income-generating elements to cover the costs in the less positive segments! - will it take many more years before the shareholders get a GOOD return on their investment! ?8.8. · Muokattu·Well, it's good that you think it's a good return! - I hope you've sold your shares so you can enjoy the 25%! The people who went in at the time of the IPO and haven't received dividends for many years and haven't sold their shares, and have had to see a historically falling price, may see it a little differently! - they may have a little difficulty understanding that they now have to accept a further dilution of the price in order to continue a strategy that has so obviously been wrong - Previous and long-term investors are of course looking for a return on their investment from the time of the IPO! - i.e. the price should probably be tripled compared to today plus there will be considerable dividends for the next many years before they are quite understandably satisfied - by the way, these are the kind of investors who are the backbone of most companies and perhaps therefore should be treated particularly well! - By the way, we're talking about a share on the growth stock exchange! - it should grow, not just continue according to the old model = I don't think any company should! - NORDIC MARINE and the staff there are probably fine = by letting the company more or less continue instead of immediately integrating the company into the parent company, you are not only signaling that you want to continue the conglomerate model which has DEFINITELY not created OWNER value since the IPO - possibly personnel and management values, but not OWNER values for the shareholders! - it is to get these values that I and many others invest in companies and it is to get a share in our investments that companies are registered on the stock exchange - then you also have to accept that such demands are made on the companies and their management, it's that simple! THE OWNERS are still the most important STAKEHOLDER on the stock exchange! - In other words, I think a new strategy is needed and a replacement and not least an expansion of the board of directors and that the payment for NORDIC MARINE, which is to be immediately integrated, must be made via loan capital with a guarantee in the VIETNAM investment!9.8.·Well, that's how you look at it! - I don't - just like some others - I might even dare to say many others! but fortunately there are many different investors! - otherwise it would look bad for Danish listed companies and workplaces in Denmark! - I believe in the role of ownership and thus the duty to growth, development and change, as the engine of earnings, especially in a disruptive future! - that's why I thought it was a nice remark the new NOVO CEO made about your predecessor when he said FRUERGAARD was the best when he took over as CEO of NOVO - he is no longer - now it was him (the new CEO) who was the best! - In other words, there is of course nothing wrong with FRUERGAARD and the ideas he has or had at the time! - but things change and a company that wants to survive in a disruptive world must constantly change, and therefore you must constantly ensure that you have the best director, board of directors and organization - it is the owners', i.e. In listed companies, the shareholders', task to ensure this, and the way you can constantly monitor whether there is a need for change in listed companies is to follow the price and return! - that is also in my opinion (I have observed it in other companies, so it is not new to me!) what you need in ERRIA, and I could name other companies! - SHAREHOLDERS must, in my opinion, be tough in their demands for return - boards of directors and management must deliver, - or accept that if they cannot deliver, then changes must be made - I clearly support the business philosophy that what was good yesterday may not be good today! - of course, this does not mean that the current management/supervisory boards are suddenly incompetent - they can be perfectly fine just in another place or in another position! - but they just couldn't produce more where they are! - I also just think it's foolish not to take advantage of the opportunity for a larger board when the articles of association allow it and the opportunities are there, - it's the cheapest knowledge capital a company can get! - FIRST NORTH is a growth stock exchange! - ERRIA does not hide that they are a growth company, so I think it's completely wrong to claim that ERRIA is not a growth company. ! = it's a company that doesn't deliver on its promises - that's not good!
- 7.8.·Exciting with a small acquisition. There is little information about Nordic Marine Partner ApS, but we can inform you that in 2024 the company had a gross profit of DKK 4.6 million with a profit before tax of DKK 1.7 million. The profit grew by a good 20% compared to 2023. There is also little information about how much dilution existing shareholders must accept. It appears that the acquisition does not affect the guidance for 2025. If the company expects the same profit before tax as last year (DKK 1.7 million), then the 4 months should lift the result for the ERRIA group by a small DKK 600k. There are then two options: (1) This amount can be included in the current guidance interval for EBIT of DKK 4-7 million, or (2) ERRIA is behind guidance and the acquired 600k in EBIT will bring them back on track. Finally, I lack an expectation of what the acquisition will contribute on a normalized basis (i.e. on a full-year basis).21.8. · Muokattu·Now there was an upward adjustment: 20% better EBITDA, if you take the middle of the range. Quite nice and impressive. I wonder if the new acquisition will also contribute positively? My option (2) above is therefore now rejected. This suggests that there may be a little more to come when Erria is confident that the new acquisition is well integrated. All in all, very positive. However, I would like them to announce what the acquisition is expected to contribute more explicitly, so that shareholders can see the sense in the dilution.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Denmark
Määrä
Osto
531
Myynti
Määrä
1 654
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 10.3.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 26.8. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 3.4. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 10.3. | |
| 2024 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.8.2024 | |
| 2023 Yhtiökokous | 3.4.2024 |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Q2-osavuosiraportti
Vain PDF
20 päivää sitten
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 10.3.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 26.8. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 3.4. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 10.3. | |
| 2024 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 21.8.2024 | |
| 2023 Yhtiökokous | 3.4.2024 |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 21.8. · Muokattu·Upgrading, wonderful. Could be nice with course 521.8.·2024 result was shown at EBITDA = 10.4 million. So the upward adjustment must also be seen in light of a conservative guidance to start with. But otherwise it is of course only a positive message.
- 18.8.·Remember that returns to shareholders and for shipping companies BIG returns are the hallmark of a listed company! - it helps all the way through, also when doing M&A's, partly you get the best out of them, but it also becomes easier to create financing! - it is one of ERRIA's biggest problems that you have not rewarded your shareholders EVER! - that is not a good signal to send if you want to be a GROWTH COMPANY listed on a GROWTH STOCK EXCHANGE! - It is important to note that on a stock exchange the shareholder is the absolute most important stakeholder! - it is the whole basis of a stock exchange that you can find investors (shareholders) who will support a company with their money - therefore RETURN always comes first if you want to be listed on a stock exchange and have the unique opportunity it provides to finance your company and the ideas you may have! - if you don't want to and that's fine with me - but then you shouldn't be listed on a stock exchange, especially a growth stock exchange, then you have to find another way to raise capital and there are many who do that with great success!
- 7.8.·If you hadn't made that investment in VIETNAM 12 million, of course there would have been a need for a capital injection! - I would also think you could have gotten a loan instead of the injection if you wanted to! - - but that would have been to the benefit of the shareholders! - I don't understand what the plans are - an expansion of the conglomerate strategy, where you use the income from the income-generating elements to cover the costs in the less positive segments! - will it take many more years before the shareholders get a GOOD return on their investment! ?8.8. · Muokattu·Well, it's good that you think it's a good return! - I hope you've sold your shares so you can enjoy the 25%! The people who went in at the time of the IPO and haven't received dividends for many years and haven't sold their shares, and have had to see a historically falling price, may see it a little differently! - they may have a little difficulty understanding that they now have to accept a further dilution of the price in order to continue a strategy that has so obviously been wrong - Previous and long-term investors are of course looking for a return on their investment from the time of the IPO! - i.e. the price should probably be tripled compared to today plus there will be considerable dividends for the next many years before they are quite understandably satisfied - by the way, these are the kind of investors who are the backbone of most companies and perhaps therefore should be treated particularly well! - By the way, we're talking about a share on the growth stock exchange! - it should grow, not just continue according to the old model = I don't think any company should! - NORDIC MARINE and the staff there are probably fine = by letting the company more or less continue instead of immediately integrating the company into the parent company, you are not only signaling that you want to continue the conglomerate model which has DEFINITELY not created OWNER value since the IPO - possibly personnel and management values, but not OWNER values for the shareholders! - it is to get these values that I and many others invest in companies and it is to get a share in our investments that companies are registered on the stock exchange - then you also have to accept that such demands are made on the companies and their management, it's that simple! THE OWNERS are still the most important STAKEHOLDER on the stock exchange! - In other words, I think a new strategy is needed and a replacement and not least an expansion of the board of directors and that the payment for NORDIC MARINE, which is to be immediately integrated, must be made via loan capital with a guarantee in the VIETNAM investment!9.8.·Well, that's how you look at it! - I don't - just like some others - I might even dare to say many others! but fortunately there are many different investors! - otherwise it would look bad for Danish listed companies and workplaces in Denmark! - I believe in the role of ownership and thus the duty to growth, development and change, as the engine of earnings, especially in a disruptive future! - that's why I thought it was a nice remark the new NOVO CEO made about your predecessor when he said FRUERGAARD was the best when he took over as CEO of NOVO - he is no longer - now it was him (the new CEO) who was the best! - In other words, there is of course nothing wrong with FRUERGAARD and the ideas he has or had at the time! - but things change and a company that wants to survive in a disruptive world must constantly change, and therefore you must constantly ensure that you have the best director, board of directors and organization - it is the owners', i.e. In listed companies, the shareholders', task to ensure this, and the way you can constantly monitor whether there is a need for change in listed companies is to follow the price and return! - that is also in my opinion (I have observed it in other companies, so it is not new to me!) what you need in ERRIA, and I could name other companies! - SHAREHOLDERS must, in my opinion, be tough in their demands for return - boards of directors and management must deliver, - or accept that if they cannot deliver, then changes must be made - I clearly support the business philosophy that what was good yesterday may not be good today! - of course, this does not mean that the current management/supervisory boards are suddenly incompetent - they can be perfectly fine just in another place or in another position! - but they just couldn't produce more where they are! - I also just think it's foolish not to take advantage of the opportunity for a larger board when the articles of association allow it and the opportunities are there, - it's the cheapest knowledge capital a company can get! - FIRST NORTH is a growth stock exchange! - ERRIA does not hide that they are a growth company, so I think it's completely wrong to claim that ERRIA is not a growth company. ! = it's a company that doesn't deliver on its promises - that's not good!
- 7.8.·Exciting with a small acquisition. There is little information about Nordic Marine Partner ApS, but we can inform you that in 2024 the company had a gross profit of DKK 4.6 million with a profit before tax of DKK 1.7 million. The profit grew by a good 20% compared to 2023. There is also little information about how much dilution existing shareholders must accept. It appears that the acquisition does not affect the guidance for 2025. If the company expects the same profit before tax as last year (DKK 1.7 million), then the 4 months should lift the result for the ERRIA group by a small DKK 600k. There are then two options: (1) This amount can be included in the current guidance interval for EBIT of DKK 4-7 million, or (2) ERRIA is behind guidance and the acquired 600k in EBIT will bring them back on track. Finally, I lack an expectation of what the acquisition will contribute on a normalized basis (i.e. on a full-year basis).21.8. · Muokattu·Now there was an upward adjustment: 20% better EBITDA, if you take the middle of the range. Quite nice and impressive. I wonder if the new acquisition will also contribute positively? My option (2) above is therefore now rejected. This suggests that there may be a little more to come when Erria is confident that the new acquisition is well integrated. All in all, very positive. However, I would like them to announce what the acquisition is expected to contribute more explicitly, so that shareholders can see the sense in the dilution.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Denmark
Määrä
Osto
531
Myynti
Määrä
1 654
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt