2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
4 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 410 | NON | NON | ||
| 17 151 | SSWM | NON | ||
| 6 098 | NON | NON |
Ylin
0,374VWAP
Alin
0,368VaihtoMäärä
0 23 659
VWAP
Ylin
0,374Alin
0,368VaihtoMäärä
0 23 659
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 20.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 21.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.3.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·3 päivää sittenMixed results On the one hand, they hit well below guidance, on the other hand, they hit approximately where I expected and better than I had feared after they lost their, as far as we know, by far largest contract. I have previously posted my compilation of how good/bad they are at living up to guidance and will post an updated version in a reply to this post. As one can see, there is now a slight overweight of failed targets compared to fulfilled ones, which makes sense to measure, and perhaps most importantly, most failed targets failed significantly, while all achieved targets were only just barely achieved. This creates serious credibility problems, and it frankly seems incredible that from the beginning of the year I could estimate that the annual result would probably end at approximately the -6 Mkr it ends at (I think my estimate was -5 to -8) while they guide positively. It didn't add up then, and it doesn't now either. On the positive side, they write that this time they are guiding more conservatively, so we will see if they hit better this time, I very much hope so (they themselves write that they believe they will hit above guidance). Regarding guidance, it is also worth noting that guidance for the annual result and net cash flow has been omitted. Net cash flow is fine to do without. It has been positive for a couple of years now, yes, but only because they keep borrowing money, so there isn't much guidance in saying that they will again borrow money so they don't end up without working capital. Net result, on the other hand, is more critical. What most of us are waiting for is for them to turn it positive, so it would have been nice with guidance on how that part is going, but it might be too embarrassing to guide -2.5 to -4.5 Mkr (my best guess) a year after they thought they would hit positive. On the positive side, it is a good sign that they have hit a positive EBITDA, and it shows that they ARE on the right track, even if it is going somewhat slower than both we and they had hoped. For some companies, I would place more weight on EBITDA than I do for RISK because the expenses not included under EBITDA are quite critical: Most critical are probably interest expenses. They have financial expenses of 4.9 Mkr in 2025, and that number will only increase in 2026 as debt increases, so it's fine to make money from operations, but as long as one cannot earn enough to pay the interest on one's loans and therefore has to increase the loan, there is still a long way to go.
·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuNegative EBITDA in Q4? EBITDA for the first 3 quarters in 2025: +1.042t. EBITDA for the whole of 2025: +517t. They write that they have positive EBITDA in Q4 of 129t Hmmm......something doesn't add up?·3 päivää sittenBy the way: If you look at the figure top right on p11 in the Q4 report, you can see that they have downgraded the EBITDA result for Q3. They reported at the time 0.758 Mkr and in the figure it looks more like 0.2 Mkr. So we must hope that there won't be a similar downgrade of EBITDA for Q4 because then it will end up in negative.
·9.2.Good news will probably come soon from RI :-) Best regards Jimm
·10.2.And what news would that be??? I rather see a Q4 report that once again flops spectacularly and the price is halved....
·29.1.Buying opportunity called?·30.1.Perhaps they have changed strategy regarding announcements? However, I am not aware that they have announced a new policy for investor information. But I gradually find it becoming more and more embarrassing. There has been a lot of junk listed on First North/Spotlight. I hope RISK doesn't become the next in line to make headlines in Børsen as a result of a bankruptcy.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
4 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenMixed results On the one hand, they hit well below guidance, on the other hand, they hit approximately where I expected and better than I had feared after they lost their, as far as we know, by far largest contract. I have previously posted my compilation of how good/bad they are at living up to guidance and will post an updated version in a reply to this post. As one can see, there is now a slight overweight of failed targets compared to fulfilled ones, which makes sense to measure, and perhaps most importantly, most failed targets failed significantly, while all achieved targets were only just barely achieved. This creates serious credibility problems, and it frankly seems incredible that from the beginning of the year I could estimate that the annual result would probably end at approximately the -6 Mkr it ends at (I think my estimate was -5 to -8) while they guide positively. It didn't add up then, and it doesn't now either. On the positive side, they write that this time they are guiding more conservatively, so we will see if they hit better this time, I very much hope so (they themselves write that they believe they will hit above guidance). Regarding guidance, it is also worth noting that guidance for the annual result and net cash flow has been omitted. Net cash flow is fine to do without. It has been positive for a couple of years now, yes, but only because they keep borrowing money, so there isn't much guidance in saying that they will again borrow money so they don't end up without working capital. Net result, on the other hand, is more critical. What most of us are waiting for is for them to turn it positive, so it would have been nice with guidance on how that part is going, but it might be too embarrassing to guide -2.5 to -4.5 Mkr (my best guess) a year after they thought they would hit positive. On the positive side, it is a good sign that they have hit a positive EBITDA, and it shows that they ARE on the right track, even if it is going somewhat slower than both we and they had hoped. For some companies, I would place more weight on EBITDA than I do for RISK because the expenses not included under EBITDA are quite critical: Most critical are probably interest expenses. They have financial expenses of 4.9 Mkr in 2025, and that number will only increase in 2026 as debt increases, so it's fine to make money from operations, but as long as one cannot earn enough to pay the interest on one's loans and therefore has to increase the loan, there is still a long way to go.
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuNegative EBITDA in Q4? EBITDA for the first 3 quarters in 2025: +1.042t. EBITDA for the whole of 2025: +517t. They write that they have positive EBITDA in Q4 of 129t Hmmm......something doesn't add up?·3 päivää sittenBy the way: If you look at the figure top right on p11 in the Q4 report, you can see that they have downgraded the EBITDA result for Q3. They reported at the time 0.758 Mkr and in the figure it looks more like 0.2 Mkr. So we must hope that there won't be a similar downgrade of EBITDA for Q4 because then it will end up in negative.
- ·9.2.Good news will probably come soon from RI :-) Best regards Jimm·10.2.And what news would that be??? I rather see a Q4 report that once again flops spectacularly and the price is halved....
- ·29.1.Buying opportunity called?·30.1.Perhaps they have changed strategy regarding announcements? However, I am not aware that they have announced a new policy for investor information. But I gradually find it becoming more and more embarrassing. There has been a lot of junk listed on First North/Spotlight. I hope RISK doesn't become the next in line to make headlines in Børsen as a result of a bankruptcy.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 410 | NON | NON | ||
| 17 151 | SSWM | NON | ||
| 6 098 | NON | NON |
Ylin
0,374VWAP
Alin
0,368VaihtoMäärä
0 23 659
VWAP
Ylin
0,374Alin
0,368VaihtoMäärä
0 23 659
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 20.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 21.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.3.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
4 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla | |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 20.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 21.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 3.3.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenMixed results On the one hand, they hit well below guidance, on the other hand, they hit approximately where I expected and better than I had feared after they lost their, as far as we know, by far largest contract. I have previously posted my compilation of how good/bad they are at living up to guidance and will post an updated version in a reply to this post. As one can see, there is now a slight overweight of failed targets compared to fulfilled ones, which makes sense to measure, and perhaps most importantly, most failed targets failed significantly, while all achieved targets were only just barely achieved. This creates serious credibility problems, and it frankly seems incredible that from the beginning of the year I could estimate that the annual result would probably end at approximately the -6 Mkr it ends at (I think my estimate was -5 to -8) while they guide positively. It didn't add up then, and it doesn't now either. On the positive side, they write that this time they are guiding more conservatively, so we will see if they hit better this time, I very much hope so (they themselves write that they believe they will hit above guidance). Regarding guidance, it is also worth noting that guidance for the annual result and net cash flow has been omitted. Net cash flow is fine to do without. It has been positive for a couple of years now, yes, but only because they keep borrowing money, so there isn't much guidance in saying that they will again borrow money so they don't end up without working capital. Net result, on the other hand, is more critical. What most of us are waiting for is for them to turn it positive, so it would have been nice with guidance on how that part is going, but it might be too embarrassing to guide -2.5 to -4.5 Mkr (my best guess) a year after they thought they would hit positive. On the positive side, it is a good sign that they have hit a positive EBITDA, and it shows that they ARE on the right track, even if it is going somewhat slower than both we and they had hoped. For some companies, I would place more weight on EBITDA than I do for RISK because the expenses not included under EBITDA are quite critical: Most critical are probably interest expenses. They have financial expenses of 4.9 Mkr in 2025, and that number will only increase in 2026 as debt increases, so it's fine to make money from operations, but as long as one cannot earn enough to pay the interest on one's loans and therefore has to increase the loan, there is still a long way to go.
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuNegative EBITDA in Q4? EBITDA for the first 3 quarters in 2025: +1.042t. EBITDA for the whole of 2025: +517t. They write that they have positive EBITDA in Q4 of 129t Hmmm......something doesn't add up?·3 päivää sittenBy the way: If you look at the figure top right on p11 in the Q4 report, you can see that they have downgraded the EBITDA result for Q3. They reported at the time 0.758 Mkr and in the figure it looks more like 0.2 Mkr. So we must hope that there won't be a similar downgrade of EBITDA for Q4 because then it will end up in negative.
- ·9.2.Good news will probably come soon from RI :-) Best regards Jimm·10.2.And what news would that be??? I rather see a Q4 report that once again flops spectacularly and the price is halved....
- ·29.1.Buying opportunity called?·30.1.Perhaps they have changed strategy regarding announcements? However, I am not aware that they have announced a new policy for investor information. But I gradually find it becoming more and more embarrassing. There has been a lot of junk listed on First North/Spotlight. I hope RISK doesn't become the next in line to make headlines in Børsen as a result of a bankruptcy.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 410 | NON | NON | ||
| 17 151 | SSWM | NON | ||
| 6 098 | NON | NON |
Ylin
0,374VWAP
Alin
0,368VaihtoMäärä
0 23 659
VWAP
Ylin
0,374Alin
0,368VaihtoMäärä
0 23 659
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt