Q3-osavuosiraportti
UUTTA
2 päivää sitten‧50 min
0,5078 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 11.12.
19,09 %Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
3 533
Myynti
Määrä
64
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 14 378 | - | - | ||
| 672 | - | - | ||
| 8 441 | - | - | ||
| 19 | - | - |
Ylin
18,135VWAP
Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
VWAP
Ylin
18,135Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 24.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 27.11. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 26.8. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.5. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 8.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 25.2. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·12 t sitten · MuokattuWell folks, then we'll update ourselves on what the short sellers did yesterday (Thursday). And a little exchange of thoughts at the end. I'm setting up the list in a different order today. The total was reduced from 4.17% down to 3.45% = 0.72% (this is not correct) Or from 18.61 million shares down to 15.38 million shares. A reduction of approx. 3.23 million shares. These are also completely wrong numbers.. Due to the Financial Supervisory Authority's rule that positions UNDER 0.5% are not shown or counted in the number of shares. NUMERIC, Citadel A and ACTUS did nothing. Then we take big wolf Marshall W who reduced from 1.50% down to 1.37%=0.13% . Or from 6.67 million down to 6.08 million. A reduction of approx. 589,000 shares. Then we come to Voleon. And here comes the magic of the Financial Supervisory Authority. They stood at 0.59% before yesterday .and now stand at 0....This is obviously not the reality. But we take what we can confirm .... They must have reduced from 0.59% at least down to 0.49% Or by approx. 450,000 shares.. They may have reduced a bit further down but not to zero as the list shows. My tip is a maximum of 150,000 more shares. They have now become a "pike in the reeds" that swims just below the Financial Supervisory Authority's limit, and the chance that they suddenly reappear on the list is great. Then there will be a new list (now with only 4 players. like this.). Marshall W. 1,37% 6,08 mill NUMERIC. 0,90% 4,01 mill ACTUS. 0,61% 2,71 mill Citadel A. 0,57% 2,57. mill TOTALT. 3,45% 15,38 mill. And then we have at least one pike with approx 2 million shares So approx 17.4 million is probably quite close to reality. Then we conclude a bit Marshall W reduced by 589,000 shares and Voleon by approx 500,000 shares Then we say that these 2 reduced by approx 1.1 million shares yesterday. Total daily turnover was a little over 10 million shares. So yesterday's great increase was probably mostly due to the BRILLIANT report and not the short sellers' buyback of shares. However, we must still assume that it had an impact. Have a wonderful evening, and enjoy life.
·13 t sittenThere is much talk about the danger of future overcapacity in container shipping with rate drops as a result. As previously pointed out several times in the forum, this is a threat that mainly affects the large ocean carriers and not the smaller ships (feeders). A potential opening of Suez will, due to shorter transit times, especially from Asia to Europe, on paper lead to more available capacity. This is undoubtedly true, and more available capacity will in a normal situation lead to rate drops. What analysts and other experts do not seem to take into account are the immediate challenges the industry will face the moment the canal reopens. Everyone saw the chaos that arose when Evergreen put a ship across the canal? It took months to clear all the fully loaded ocean vessels that had accumulated in the canal and which more or less arrived at the transhipment ports in Europe (Rotterdam, Bremerhaven, Antwerp etc.) simultaneously. This led to massive congestion, as the capacity in these ports is already under pressure due to strikes and space challenges, which in turn led to good times for feeder operators. The canal was closed for 6 days... Imagine this scenario; There are 15-20 ships of size 17-23 000 TEUS going from Asia to Europe every week. If/when Suez reopens, in a hypothetical scenario, there will be approximately 15 - 20 ships en route around South Africa and 15-20 ships that will go through Suez. These will hit Europe more or less at the same time. (2 weeks around the Cape, 1 week+ saved via Suez)., The capacity in transhipment Europe is already at breaking point.. My prediction is that this will be complete chaos, with an overflow of volume and long waiting times for unloading. Complete chaos in this context means good times for everyone with ships in the feeder segment and, for that matter, in the ocean segment. History has shown us several times over the last 5-6 years that it takes much longer than one thinks to clear up major disruptions. A bonus in an even longer perspective will be further pressure on rates if ocean vessels remain queued for a longer time in Europe, with the result that there will be a lack of capacity in Asia if they do not make it back to their original schedule.. I think this looks quite promising :)- ·13 t sitten · MuokattuWell folks. The update on what the short sellers did yesterday Thursday has arrived. It looks like a lot at first glance. But we who know about Finanstilsynet's "magic" limit won't be fooled Must break down the numbers, then the updates will come shortly
·14 t sittenConsidering an entry here. Has anyone relatively recently calculated what NAV is? I believe in the segment and have previously been a shareholder. I will use the weekend to read up. I appreciate some help.- ·15 t sitten · MuokattuSee some write about DnB/Car Jørgen Lian's "exploits/writings" about MPCC. I have told the story behind the always negative analyses at least 2 times, but tonight or during the afternoon/evening we will have a repetition. Once worked together with an old man. He said::;EVERYTHING has a natural explanation, it was only when I got older myself that I realized he was right. An explanation lies behind Jørgen /DnB's analyses too. Have a splendid day and a good weekend everyone.·15 t sittenDNB used the word impressive and said future ship purchases were worth 3-5% on the share price so now they have updated the target from 14.5 to 14.9 or just under 3% - still negative bias on MPC then.·14 t sitten · Muokattuticket2the_moon. When I saw Jørgen Lian utter the word "imponerende" about MPCC, my coffee got stuck in my throat. Jørgen has certainly not said this in the 3-4 years I've been with MPCC. I guarantee that .... But he somehow had to get out of the mess he had gotten himself into... Let's go back a bit in time. On May 24, 2024, DnB analyst Jørgen Lian stated the following..... A valuation in iMPCC that reflects a consistently good market for all open days until 2026 IS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. And how did that go, Jørgen ...You were wrong. But it's worse than that. from Q2 -25 to Q-3 -25, the fantastic management at MPCC has increased the contract volume from 34% up to 55% for 2027... Yes Jørgen, now we're probably talking pm too good to be true again???? Now MPCC is starting to fill up its order book over 55% for 2027 with brilliant rates . Or too good to be true were probably the words Jørgen used.... Just to top it all off, 31% of the order book for 2028 is now also filled up ... With what rates, Jørgen??? No wonder he HAS to use the word IMPRESSIVE. He is exposed in the market, that's my theory. Admitting that one has been wrong is sometimes difficult. Those who have backbone and are honest, they do it anyway. Have a great weekend everyone, you too Jørgen.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q3-osavuosiraportti
UUTTA
2 päivää sitten‧50 min
0,5078 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 11.12.
19,09 %Tuotto/v
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·12 t sitten · MuokattuWell folks, then we'll update ourselves on what the short sellers did yesterday (Thursday). And a little exchange of thoughts at the end. I'm setting up the list in a different order today. The total was reduced from 4.17% down to 3.45% = 0.72% (this is not correct) Or from 18.61 million shares down to 15.38 million shares. A reduction of approx. 3.23 million shares. These are also completely wrong numbers.. Due to the Financial Supervisory Authority's rule that positions UNDER 0.5% are not shown or counted in the number of shares. NUMERIC, Citadel A and ACTUS did nothing. Then we take big wolf Marshall W who reduced from 1.50% down to 1.37%=0.13% . Or from 6.67 million down to 6.08 million. A reduction of approx. 589,000 shares. Then we come to Voleon. And here comes the magic of the Financial Supervisory Authority. They stood at 0.59% before yesterday .and now stand at 0....This is obviously not the reality. But we take what we can confirm .... They must have reduced from 0.59% at least down to 0.49% Or by approx. 450,000 shares.. They may have reduced a bit further down but not to zero as the list shows. My tip is a maximum of 150,000 more shares. They have now become a "pike in the reeds" that swims just below the Financial Supervisory Authority's limit, and the chance that they suddenly reappear on the list is great. Then there will be a new list (now with only 4 players. like this.). Marshall W. 1,37% 6,08 mill NUMERIC. 0,90% 4,01 mill ACTUS. 0,61% 2,71 mill Citadel A. 0,57% 2,57. mill TOTALT. 3,45% 15,38 mill. And then we have at least one pike with approx 2 million shares So approx 17.4 million is probably quite close to reality. Then we conclude a bit Marshall W reduced by 589,000 shares and Voleon by approx 500,000 shares Then we say that these 2 reduced by approx 1.1 million shares yesterday. Total daily turnover was a little over 10 million shares. So yesterday's great increase was probably mostly due to the BRILLIANT report and not the short sellers' buyback of shares. However, we must still assume that it had an impact. Have a wonderful evening, and enjoy life.
- ·13 t sittenThere is much talk about the danger of future overcapacity in container shipping with rate drops as a result. As previously pointed out several times in the forum, this is a threat that mainly affects the large ocean carriers and not the smaller ships (feeders). A potential opening of Suez will, due to shorter transit times, especially from Asia to Europe, on paper lead to more available capacity. This is undoubtedly true, and more available capacity will in a normal situation lead to rate drops. What analysts and other experts do not seem to take into account are the immediate challenges the industry will face the moment the canal reopens. Everyone saw the chaos that arose when Evergreen put a ship across the canal? It took months to clear all the fully loaded ocean vessels that had accumulated in the canal and which more or less arrived at the transhipment ports in Europe (Rotterdam, Bremerhaven, Antwerp etc.) simultaneously. This led to massive congestion, as the capacity in these ports is already under pressure due to strikes and space challenges, which in turn led to good times for feeder operators. The canal was closed for 6 days... Imagine this scenario; There are 15-20 ships of size 17-23 000 TEUS going from Asia to Europe every week. If/when Suez reopens, in a hypothetical scenario, there will be approximately 15 - 20 ships en route around South Africa and 15-20 ships that will go through Suez. These will hit Europe more or less at the same time. (2 weeks around the Cape, 1 week+ saved via Suez)., The capacity in transhipment Europe is already at breaking point.. My prediction is that this will be complete chaos, with an overflow of volume and long waiting times for unloading. Complete chaos in this context means good times for everyone with ships in the feeder segment and, for that matter, in the ocean segment. History has shown us several times over the last 5-6 years that it takes much longer than one thinks to clear up major disruptions. A bonus in an even longer perspective will be further pressure on rates if ocean vessels remain queued for a longer time in Europe, with the result that there will be a lack of capacity in Asia if they do not make it back to their original schedule.. I think this looks quite promising :)
- ·13 t sitten · MuokattuWell folks. The update on what the short sellers did yesterday Thursday has arrived. It looks like a lot at first glance. But we who know about Finanstilsynet's "magic" limit won't be fooled Must break down the numbers, then the updates will come shortly
- ·14 t sittenConsidering an entry here. Has anyone relatively recently calculated what NAV is? I believe in the segment and have previously been a shareholder. I will use the weekend to read up. I appreciate some help.
- ·15 t sitten · MuokattuSee some write about DnB/Car Jørgen Lian's "exploits/writings" about MPCC. I have told the story behind the always negative analyses at least 2 times, but tonight or during the afternoon/evening we will have a repetition. Once worked together with an old man. He said::;EVERYTHING has a natural explanation, it was only when I got older myself that I realized he was right. An explanation lies behind Jørgen /DnB's analyses too. Have a splendid day and a good weekend everyone.·15 t sittenDNB used the word impressive and said future ship purchases were worth 3-5% on the share price so now they have updated the target from 14.5 to 14.9 or just under 3% - still negative bias on MPC then.·14 t sitten · Muokattuticket2the_moon. When I saw Jørgen Lian utter the word "imponerende" about MPCC, my coffee got stuck in my throat. Jørgen has certainly not said this in the 3-4 years I've been with MPCC. I guarantee that .... But he somehow had to get out of the mess he had gotten himself into... Let's go back a bit in time. On May 24, 2024, DnB analyst Jørgen Lian stated the following..... A valuation in iMPCC that reflects a consistently good market for all open days until 2026 IS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. And how did that go, Jørgen ...You were wrong. But it's worse than that. from Q2 -25 to Q-3 -25, the fantastic management at MPCC has increased the contract volume from 34% up to 55% for 2027... Yes Jørgen, now we're probably talking pm too good to be true again???? Now MPCC is starting to fill up its order book over 55% for 2027 with brilliant rates . Or too good to be true were probably the words Jørgen used.... Just to top it all off, 31% of the order book for 2028 is now also filled up ... With what rates, Jørgen??? No wonder he HAS to use the word IMPRESSIVE. He is exposed in the market, that's my theory. Admitting that one has been wrong is sometimes difficult. Those who have backbone and are honest, they do it anyway. Have a great weekend everyone, you too Jørgen.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
3 533
Myynti
Määrä
64
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 14 378 | - | - | ||
| 672 | - | - | ||
| 8 441 | - | - | ||
| 19 | - | - |
Ylin
18,135VWAP
Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
VWAP
Ylin
18,135Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 24.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 27.11. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 26.8. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.5. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 8.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 25.2. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Q3-osavuosiraportti
UUTTA
2 päivää sitten‧50 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 24.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 27.11. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 26.8. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.5. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 8.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 25.2. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
0,5078 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 11.12.
19,09 %Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·12 t sitten · MuokattuWell folks, then we'll update ourselves on what the short sellers did yesterday (Thursday). And a little exchange of thoughts at the end. I'm setting up the list in a different order today. The total was reduced from 4.17% down to 3.45% = 0.72% (this is not correct) Or from 18.61 million shares down to 15.38 million shares. A reduction of approx. 3.23 million shares. These are also completely wrong numbers.. Due to the Financial Supervisory Authority's rule that positions UNDER 0.5% are not shown or counted in the number of shares. NUMERIC, Citadel A and ACTUS did nothing. Then we take big wolf Marshall W who reduced from 1.50% down to 1.37%=0.13% . Or from 6.67 million down to 6.08 million. A reduction of approx. 589,000 shares. Then we come to Voleon. And here comes the magic of the Financial Supervisory Authority. They stood at 0.59% before yesterday .and now stand at 0....This is obviously not the reality. But we take what we can confirm .... They must have reduced from 0.59% at least down to 0.49% Or by approx. 450,000 shares.. They may have reduced a bit further down but not to zero as the list shows. My tip is a maximum of 150,000 more shares. They have now become a "pike in the reeds" that swims just below the Financial Supervisory Authority's limit, and the chance that they suddenly reappear on the list is great. Then there will be a new list (now with only 4 players. like this.). Marshall W. 1,37% 6,08 mill NUMERIC. 0,90% 4,01 mill ACTUS. 0,61% 2,71 mill Citadel A. 0,57% 2,57. mill TOTALT. 3,45% 15,38 mill. And then we have at least one pike with approx 2 million shares So approx 17.4 million is probably quite close to reality. Then we conclude a bit Marshall W reduced by 589,000 shares and Voleon by approx 500,000 shares Then we say that these 2 reduced by approx 1.1 million shares yesterday. Total daily turnover was a little over 10 million shares. So yesterday's great increase was probably mostly due to the BRILLIANT report and not the short sellers' buyback of shares. However, we must still assume that it had an impact. Have a wonderful evening, and enjoy life.
- ·13 t sittenThere is much talk about the danger of future overcapacity in container shipping with rate drops as a result. As previously pointed out several times in the forum, this is a threat that mainly affects the large ocean carriers and not the smaller ships (feeders). A potential opening of Suez will, due to shorter transit times, especially from Asia to Europe, on paper lead to more available capacity. This is undoubtedly true, and more available capacity will in a normal situation lead to rate drops. What analysts and other experts do not seem to take into account are the immediate challenges the industry will face the moment the canal reopens. Everyone saw the chaos that arose when Evergreen put a ship across the canal? It took months to clear all the fully loaded ocean vessels that had accumulated in the canal and which more or less arrived at the transhipment ports in Europe (Rotterdam, Bremerhaven, Antwerp etc.) simultaneously. This led to massive congestion, as the capacity in these ports is already under pressure due to strikes and space challenges, which in turn led to good times for feeder operators. The canal was closed for 6 days... Imagine this scenario; There are 15-20 ships of size 17-23 000 TEUS going from Asia to Europe every week. If/when Suez reopens, in a hypothetical scenario, there will be approximately 15 - 20 ships en route around South Africa and 15-20 ships that will go through Suez. These will hit Europe more or less at the same time. (2 weeks around the Cape, 1 week+ saved via Suez)., The capacity in transhipment Europe is already at breaking point.. My prediction is that this will be complete chaos, with an overflow of volume and long waiting times for unloading. Complete chaos in this context means good times for everyone with ships in the feeder segment and, for that matter, in the ocean segment. History has shown us several times over the last 5-6 years that it takes much longer than one thinks to clear up major disruptions. A bonus in an even longer perspective will be further pressure on rates if ocean vessels remain queued for a longer time in Europe, with the result that there will be a lack of capacity in Asia if they do not make it back to their original schedule.. I think this looks quite promising :)
- ·13 t sitten · MuokattuWell folks. The update on what the short sellers did yesterday Thursday has arrived. It looks like a lot at first glance. But we who know about Finanstilsynet's "magic" limit won't be fooled Must break down the numbers, then the updates will come shortly
- ·14 t sittenConsidering an entry here. Has anyone relatively recently calculated what NAV is? I believe in the segment and have previously been a shareholder. I will use the weekend to read up. I appreciate some help.
- ·15 t sitten · MuokattuSee some write about DnB/Car Jørgen Lian's "exploits/writings" about MPCC. I have told the story behind the always negative analyses at least 2 times, but tonight or during the afternoon/evening we will have a repetition. Once worked together with an old man. He said::;EVERYTHING has a natural explanation, it was only when I got older myself that I realized he was right. An explanation lies behind Jørgen /DnB's analyses too. Have a splendid day and a good weekend everyone.·15 t sittenDNB used the word impressive and said future ship purchases were worth 3-5% on the share price so now they have updated the target from 14.5 to 14.9 or just under 3% - still negative bias on MPC then.·14 t sitten · Muokattuticket2the_moon. When I saw Jørgen Lian utter the word "imponerende" about MPCC, my coffee got stuck in my throat. Jørgen has certainly not said this in the 3-4 years I've been with MPCC. I guarantee that .... But he somehow had to get out of the mess he had gotten himself into... Let's go back a bit in time. On May 24, 2024, DnB analyst Jørgen Lian stated the following..... A valuation in iMPCC that reflects a consistently good market for all open days until 2026 IS TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE. And how did that go, Jørgen ...You were wrong. But it's worse than that. from Q2 -25 to Q-3 -25, the fantastic management at MPCC has increased the contract volume from 34% up to 55% for 2027... Yes Jørgen, now we're probably talking pm too good to be true again???? Now MPCC is starting to fill up its order book over 55% for 2027 with brilliant rates . Or too good to be true were probably the words Jørgen used.... Just to top it all off, 31% of the order book for 2028 is now also filled up ... With what rates, Jørgen??? No wonder he HAS to use the word IMPRESSIVE. He is exposed in the market, that's my theory. Admitting that one has been wrong is sometimes difficult. Those who have backbone and are honest, they do it anyway. Have a great weekend everyone, you too Jørgen.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
3 533
Myynti
Määrä
64
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 14 378 | - | - | ||
| 672 | - | - | ||
| 8 441 | - | - | ||
| 19 | - | - |
Ylin
18,135VWAP
Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
VWAP
Ylin
18,135Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt