2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
57 päivää sitten
‧46 min
0,3862 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,66%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 27.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 27.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·1 t sittenMoving towards longer sailing distances - the Houthis are ensuring that..favorable for shipping and container 👍
Hi Cool Hand. The El-Nino effect has already begun in the Panama Canal... The draft-draught depth has already started to be reduced. And the number of boats allowed to pass in a given time period is reduced. So to simplify it all. 1. Less cargo on the boat to reduce draught. 2. Fewer boats are allowed to pass 3. Higher prices for the "slots" in the queue. 4. Longer waiting time before entering the canal. All this leads to tied-up capacity in TEU. 5. Longer waiting time = tied capacity .. 6. The logistics problems are growing. Overall, 2026 must surely be designated as a terrible year for the people working with the difficult logistics plans. They have had a tough year, and it looks far from like the problem is diminishing. It almost seems to be increasing. Almost none of this is negative for the feeder class. Have a good day everyone
·2 t sittenMærsk has chosen to temporarily halt its feeder service to Ukraine via the port Chornomorsk Fishing Port. Mærsk states this according to Bloomberg News. It is justified by "the current situation" affecting operations, but without elaborating on the actual circumstances. Bloomberg News writes in this regard that Russia has repeatedly attacked Ukraine's port infrastructure during the war. Import cargo to Chornomorsk will be redirected to Constanta in Romania, and export customers can either cancel their bookings free of charge or move the port of loading from Chornomorsk to Constanta without extra cost, it is stated. Feeder service refers to the smaller vessels that connect the port with the large container routes.- ·3 t sittenGood with newer boats towards 2030 as strict environmental requirements come into force old machines are expensive and difficult to convert
·1 päivä sittenMPCC and name change at part-owner and capital exercises etc. It is a relevant issue that was raised about the above this morning, now the post has been deleted. Risks for strategy and capital exercises are always present and especially within shipping with often somewhat complicated ownership and interest structures, which one can easily overlook if one looks a lot (or mostly) at rates and ships etc. Regarding dividends. MPCC had a younger fleet and high rates post-covid a few years ago. Now time has passed and the fleet needs to be renewed responsibly enough, partly via a reduction of the dividend. Most here know the story. It's not an issue anymore, as such. There is fundamentally nothing wrong with a company group (Like MPC Oceanic group - let's call it that after the name change) expanding, changing, growing, getting new owners etc. If one wants to try to spot in time whether concerns about the MPC structure and the MPCC share begin to materialize in practice, one can keep an eye on a couple of concrete warning signs. NB: I don't have 100% overview of the company structures, but monitor MPCC via press releases/q-reports etc. Here is a link to part of the story:https://www.mpc.de/en/media/asset-and-investment-management/muenchmeyer-petersen-co-divests-all-shares-in-mpc-capital-to-a-strategic-investor#:~:text=%E2%80%9CWe%20are%20convinced%20that%20MPC%20Capital%20AG,and%20management%20solutions%2C%E2%80%9D%20adds%20Dr.%20Axel%20Schroeder. I normally keep an eye on such exercises below; there may be more refined techniques! But read it as it is intended and supplement and assess yourself when it becomes relevant in the future for the MPCC share, namely: 1. Change in dividend policy, from what we know now, to a more structurally violent and ongoing process. Change in frequency, one could call it. 2. Now we got 4 "new" newer used ships. If we get, for example, many deals of that kind, we must look closer at it. But, 3. I would say that I think we should expect more deals, without there being something fishy, because MPCC has a couple of handfuls of ships from 2006 onwards. Soon old dogs (but rates are high and they are still alive). In that regard, we might get a new capex-wave, but that doesn't have to be bad, not even in relation to capital exercises from "part-owners'" side. I believe the indebtedness is under control at MPCC, we continuously gain insight via q-reports. Most often, ship acquisitions happen with associated charters. So if that continues... 4. If MPCC starts buying "slightly" older or "more expensive" ships from private entities that can be related to the main shareholders (e.g. the Castor/Pavimar sphere) - whatever the justification might be! - Now we must see what the development in the indices says and geopolitics. Could well change the assessment a bit, I think. 5. if MPCC/MPC capitalgroup outsources ship management tasks to associated companies at perhaps "great/very great" terms/market prices, it is a classic warning sign that values might, under assessment of reasonableness and circumstances, be "guided" out of MPCC for the benefit of, shall we say, other purposes... One-off amounts, fixed amounts and "large/larger" ongoing amounts often lead one to think of the "straw method" (siphoning off funds), even though it is of course not forbidden to earn money and does not have to be a problem. 6. If the management of MPCC officially launches plans for a name change (e.g. away from the "MPC Container Ships" known to us to something broader like "MPCC Ocean Ships" or something else fanciful :-)) I.e., one begins to introduce the idea of moving away from the core business (feeder container ships) and into other segments (such as dry bulk or tankers, which the Castor group has historically been involved in, as I recall it), it is a sign that the company may no longer be what we know. Then we must assess the situation from there. No worries. But for now, MPCC is as we know MPCC. The parent company is another story and does not need to cause concern. Assess continuously yourself. Shipping is not boring. I am long in the stock and buy continuously.
1 päivä sittenTämä julkaisu on poistettu.Mpcc has a completely superior management. Cannot be compared with Castor Ships AS. What do you want with this post?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
57 päivää sitten
‧46 min
0,3862 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,66%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenMoving towards longer sailing distances - the Houthis are ensuring that..favorable for shipping and container 👍Hi Cool Hand. The El-Nino effect has already begun in the Panama Canal... The draft-draught depth has already started to be reduced. And the number of boats allowed to pass in a given time period is reduced. So to simplify it all. 1. Less cargo on the boat to reduce draught. 2. Fewer boats are allowed to pass 3. Higher prices for the "slots" in the queue. 4. Longer waiting time before entering the canal. All this leads to tied-up capacity in TEU. 5. Longer waiting time = tied capacity .. 6. The logistics problems are growing. Overall, 2026 must surely be designated as a terrible year for the people working with the difficult logistics plans. They have had a tough year, and it looks far from like the problem is diminishing. It almost seems to be increasing. Almost none of this is negative for the feeder class. Have a good day everyone
- ·2 t sittenMærsk has chosen to temporarily halt its feeder service to Ukraine via the port Chornomorsk Fishing Port. Mærsk states this according to Bloomberg News. It is justified by "the current situation" affecting operations, but without elaborating on the actual circumstances. Bloomberg News writes in this regard that Russia has repeatedly attacked Ukraine's port infrastructure during the war. Import cargo to Chornomorsk will be redirected to Constanta in Romania, and export customers can either cancel their bookings free of charge or move the port of loading from Chornomorsk to Constanta without extra cost, it is stated. Feeder service refers to the smaller vessels that connect the port with the large container routes.
- ·3 t sittenGood with newer boats towards 2030 as strict environmental requirements come into force old machines are expensive and difficult to convert
- ·1 päivä sittenMPCC and name change at part-owner and capital exercises etc. It is a relevant issue that was raised about the above this morning, now the post has been deleted. Risks for strategy and capital exercises are always present and especially within shipping with often somewhat complicated ownership and interest structures, which one can easily overlook if one looks a lot (or mostly) at rates and ships etc. Regarding dividends. MPCC had a younger fleet and high rates post-covid a few years ago. Now time has passed and the fleet needs to be renewed responsibly enough, partly via a reduction of the dividend. Most here know the story. It's not an issue anymore, as such. There is fundamentally nothing wrong with a company group (Like MPC Oceanic group - let's call it that after the name change) expanding, changing, growing, getting new owners etc. If one wants to try to spot in time whether concerns about the MPC structure and the MPCC share begin to materialize in practice, one can keep an eye on a couple of concrete warning signs. NB: I don't have 100% overview of the company structures, but monitor MPCC via press releases/q-reports etc. Here is a link to part of the story:https://www.mpc.de/en/media/asset-and-investment-management/muenchmeyer-petersen-co-divests-all-shares-in-mpc-capital-to-a-strategic-investor#:~:text=%E2%80%9CWe%20are%20convinced%20that%20MPC%20Capital%20AG,and%20management%20solutions%2C%E2%80%9D%20adds%20Dr.%20Axel%20Schroeder. I normally keep an eye on such exercises below; there may be more refined techniques! But read it as it is intended and supplement and assess yourself when it becomes relevant in the future for the MPCC share, namely: 1. Change in dividend policy, from what we know now, to a more structurally violent and ongoing process. Change in frequency, one could call it. 2. Now we got 4 "new" newer used ships. If we get, for example, many deals of that kind, we must look closer at it. But, 3. I would say that I think we should expect more deals, without there being something fishy, because MPCC has a couple of handfuls of ships from 2006 onwards. Soon old dogs (but rates are high and they are still alive). In that regard, we might get a new capex-wave, but that doesn't have to be bad, not even in relation to capital exercises from "part-owners'" side. I believe the indebtedness is under control at MPCC, we continuously gain insight via q-reports. Most often, ship acquisitions happen with associated charters. So if that continues... 4. If MPCC starts buying "slightly" older or "more expensive" ships from private entities that can be related to the main shareholders (e.g. the Castor/Pavimar sphere) - whatever the justification might be! - Now we must see what the development in the indices says and geopolitics. Could well change the assessment a bit, I think. 5. if MPCC/MPC capitalgroup outsources ship management tasks to associated companies at perhaps "great/very great" terms/market prices, it is a classic warning sign that values might, under assessment of reasonableness and circumstances, be "guided" out of MPCC for the benefit of, shall we say, other purposes... One-off amounts, fixed amounts and "large/larger" ongoing amounts often lead one to think of the "straw method" (siphoning off funds), even though it is of course not forbidden to earn money and does not have to be a problem. 6. If the management of MPCC officially launches plans for a name change (e.g. away from the "MPC Container Ships" known to us to something broader like "MPCC Ocean Ships" or something else fanciful :-)) I.e., one begins to introduce the idea of moving away from the core business (feeder container ships) and into other segments (such as dry bulk or tankers, which the Castor group has historically been involved in, as I recall it), it is a sign that the company may no longer be what we know. Then we must assess the situation from there. No worries. But for now, MPCC is as we know MPCC. The parent company is another story and does not need to cause concern. Assess continuously yourself. Shipping is not boring. I am long in the stock and buy continuously.
- 1 päivä sittenTämä julkaisu on poistettu.Mpcc has a completely superior management. Cannot be compared with Castor Ships AS. What do you want with this post?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 27.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 27.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
57 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 27.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 27.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 |
0,3862 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,66%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenMoving towards longer sailing distances - the Houthis are ensuring that..favorable for shipping and container 👍Hi Cool Hand. The El-Nino effect has already begun in the Panama Canal... The draft-draught depth has already started to be reduced. And the number of boats allowed to pass in a given time period is reduced. So to simplify it all. 1. Less cargo on the boat to reduce draught. 2. Fewer boats are allowed to pass 3. Higher prices for the "slots" in the queue. 4. Longer waiting time before entering the canal. All this leads to tied-up capacity in TEU. 5. Longer waiting time = tied capacity .. 6. The logistics problems are growing. Overall, 2026 must surely be designated as a terrible year for the people working with the difficult logistics plans. They have had a tough year, and it looks far from like the problem is diminishing. It almost seems to be increasing. Almost none of this is negative for the feeder class. Have a good day everyone
- ·2 t sittenMærsk has chosen to temporarily halt its feeder service to Ukraine via the port Chornomorsk Fishing Port. Mærsk states this according to Bloomberg News. It is justified by "the current situation" affecting operations, but without elaborating on the actual circumstances. Bloomberg News writes in this regard that Russia has repeatedly attacked Ukraine's port infrastructure during the war. Import cargo to Chornomorsk will be redirected to Constanta in Romania, and export customers can either cancel their bookings free of charge or move the port of loading from Chornomorsk to Constanta without extra cost, it is stated. Feeder service refers to the smaller vessels that connect the port with the large container routes.
- ·3 t sittenGood with newer boats towards 2030 as strict environmental requirements come into force old machines are expensive and difficult to convert
- ·1 päivä sittenMPCC and name change at part-owner and capital exercises etc. It is a relevant issue that was raised about the above this morning, now the post has been deleted. Risks for strategy and capital exercises are always present and especially within shipping with often somewhat complicated ownership and interest structures, which one can easily overlook if one looks a lot (or mostly) at rates and ships etc. Regarding dividends. MPCC had a younger fleet and high rates post-covid a few years ago. Now time has passed and the fleet needs to be renewed responsibly enough, partly via a reduction of the dividend. Most here know the story. It's not an issue anymore, as such. There is fundamentally nothing wrong with a company group (Like MPC Oceanic group - let's call it that after the name change) expanding, changing, growing, getting new owners etc. If one wants to try to spot in time whether concerns about the MPC structure and the MPCC share begin to materialize in practice, one can keep an eye on a couple of concrete warning signs. NB: I don't have 100% overview of the company structures, but monitor MPCC via press releases/q-reports etc. Here is a link to part of the story:https://www.mpc.de/en/media/asset-and-investment-management/muenchmeyer-petersen-co-divests-all-shares-in-mpc-capital-to-a-strategic-investor#:~:text=%E2%80%9CWe%20are%20convinced%20that%20MPC%20Capital%20AG,and%20management%20solutions%2C%E2%80%9D%20adds%20Dr.%20Axel%20Schroeder. I normally keep an eye on such exercises below; there may be more refined techniques! But read it as it is intended and supplement and assess yourself when it becomes relevant in the future for the MPCC share, namely: 1. Change in dividend policy, from what we know now, to a more structurally violent and ongoing process. Change in frequency, one could call it. 2. Now we got 4 "new" newer used ships. If we get, for example, many deals of that kind, we must look closer at it. But, 3. I would say that I think we should expect more deals, without there being something fishy, because MPCC has a couple of handfuls of ships from 2006 onwards. Soon old dogs (but rates are high and they are still alive). In that regard, we might get a new capex-wave, but that doesn't have to be bad, not even in relation to capital exercises from "part-owners'" side. I believe the indebtedness is under control at MPCC, we continuously gain insight via q-reports. Most often, ship acquisitions happen with associated charters. So if that continues... 4. If MPCC starts buying "slightly" older or "more expensive" ships from private entities that can be related to the main shareholders (e.g. the Castor/Pavimar sphere) - whatever the justification might be! - Now we must see what the development in the indices says and geopolitics. Could well change the assessment a bit, I think. 5. if MPCC/MPC capitalgroup outsources ship management tasks to associated companies at perhaps "great/very great" terms/market prices, it is a classic warning sign that values might, under assessment of reasonableness and circumstances, be "guided" out of MPCC for the benefit of, shall we say, other purposes... One-off amounts, fixed amounts and "large/larger" ongoing amounts often lead one to think of the "straw method" (siphoning off funds), even though it is of course not forbidden to earn money and does not have to be a problem. 6. If the management of MPCC officially launches plans for a name change (e.g. away from the "MPC Container Ships" known to us to something broader like "MPCC Ocean Ships" or something else fanciful :-)) I.e., one begins to introduce the idea of moving away from the core business (feeder container ships) and into other segments (such as dry bulk or tankers, which the Castor group has historically been involved in, as I recall it), it is a sign that the company may no longer be what we know. Then we must assess the situation from there. No worries. But for now, MPCC is as we know MPCC. The parent company is another story and does not need to cause concern. Assess continuously yourself. Shipping is not boring. I am long in the stock and buy continuously.
- 1 päivä sittenTämä julkaisu on poistettu.Mpcc has a completely superior management. Cannot be compared with Castor Ships AS. What do you want with this post?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt