Q3-osavuosiraportti
UUTTA
2 päivää sitten‧50 min
0,5078 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 11.12.
19,09 %Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
3 533
Myynti
Määrä
64
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 14 378 | - | - | ||
| 672 | - | - | ||
| 8 441 | - | - | ||
| 19 | - | - |
Ylin
18,135VWAP
Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
VWAP
Ylin
18,135Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 24.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 27.11. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 26.8. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.5. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 8.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 25.2. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·7 t sitten · MuokattuOne way to assess the future of a company is whether it makes many commercial "mistakes", individually perceived or "generally" ascertainable. I am here roughly excluding the freight market as a whole. I don't think the MPCC management makes many mistakes. Then the question is what the share price does - this is perhaps best illustrated by the old stock market image of the diligence (the company) driving along, and the share price as a dog on a long leash. Sometimes ahead and sometimes behind. Normally, I don't focus much on management. But in MPCC's case, I think it's crystal clear what the relevance of management is here.
·9 t sitten · MuokattuSorry folks, yesterday's closing was quite hectic. So the post I promised yesterday, comes here now. And the headline will be. The reason for DnB/JØRGEN LIAN's eternal negativity towards MPCC.. I'm very busy today too, so it will be a short version I can come back to the topic later. And the reason for all the negativity/crap is the following in simple terms. Some years ago, MPCC used DnB as its lender .... As most people know, boats are expensive, and financing involves billions. Over the years, we're talking about interest expenses for MPCC and interest income in the 100 million class for DnB... When MPCC chose to use other financing institutions, DnB found this very hard to accept. They were, in short, angry and vengeful. And as a template for the future, the order from the highest level was probably .... We shall not write anything positive about this company. Preferably, we /DnB should come up with at least 1, preferably 2 bad "reviews" during the last week before the Q-report is released. And they have kept the plan.....really. But as MPCC continues to sail with great results, it has become more difficult to find "negativity" about MPCC. You know that I have hinted that JØRGEN LIAN will soon run out of negative angles. And that he will say that the boats are painted the wrong color. That statement has not yet come, but it is approaching. The day before the report, this came from Jørgen. Even though the order book for feeder vessels is smaller than what we see for the entire combined container segment, fleet growth since 2029 (I assume he means 2019) has nevertheless been 30% in a market where volume growth has been 10%... Here I want to congratulate Jørgen a bit, it only took 1.5 years to discover that the order book for feeders is small compared to the larger boat types....Welcome to the party..all the rest of us. So, back to the post. Why doesn't he just say that the order book for the feeder class is from 11 to 13%.???? No, it's about negative commentary /understanding. What does the reader think about the difference between 13% and 30%? I assume everyone understands..... Now we come to JØRGEN LIAN's statement after the report was released. When HE states that the rates' amount and duration are IMPRESSIVE, he is actually saying. DnB/(me Jørgen) has been thoroughly wrong about what has happened since the start of 2024 until today regarding rate-level development within the feeder segment. He just says it in a different way. And is there ONE person here on the medium who believes in the man's stated increase in the share price of 3 to 5% on the news from the report. Can be counted in. And then to the funniest part, DnB/Car increases its estimate from 14,50 kr up to 14,90 kr. Based on the report. I would have liked to see that calculation, which numbers were used JØRGEN ... Have you raised the rate level, or are you still using the rates I have written down, every time you have spoken to the media..???? My calculation versus yours, diverges greatly, to put it nicely.. I look forward to the next "negative" outburst from DnB/Jørgen, because they will come, I can guarantee that.. Spelling is skipped, now it's full speed ahead with something completely different. Have a wonderful weekend everyone, you too Jørgen.- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWell folks, then we'll update ourselves on what the short sellers did yesterday (Thursday). And a little exchange of thoughts at the end. I'm setting up the list in a different order today. The total was reduced from 4.17% down to 3.45% = 0.72% (this is not correct) Or from 18.61 million shares down to 15.38 million shares. A reduction of approx. 3.23 million shares. These are also completely wrong numbers.. Due to the Financial Supervisory Authority's rule that positions UNDER 0.5% are not shown or counted in the number of shares. NUMERIC, Citadel A and ACTUS did nothing. Then we take big wolf Marshall W who reduced from 1.50% down to 1.37%=0.13% . Or from 6.67 million down to 6.08 million. A reduction of approx. 589,000 shares. Then we come to Voleon. And here comes the magic of the Financial Supervisory Authority. They stood at 0.59% before yesterday .and now stand at 0....This is obviously not the reality. But we take what we can confirm .... They must have reduced from 0.59% at least down to 0.49% Or by approx. 450,000 shares.. They may have reduced a bit further down but not to zero as the list shows. My tip is a maximum of 150,000 more shares. They have now become a "pike in the reeds" that swims just below the Financial Supervisory Authority's limit, and the chance that they suddenly reappear on the list is great. Then there will be a new list (now with only 4 players. like this.). Marshall W. 1,37% 6,08 mill NUMERIC. 0,90% 4,01 mill ACTUS. 0,61% 2,71 mill Citadel A. 0,57% 2,57. mill TOTALT. 3,45% 15,38 mill. And then we have at least one pike with approx 2 million shares So approx 17.4 million is probably quite close to reality. Then we conclude a bit Marshall W reduced by 589,000 shares and Voleon by approx 500,000 shares Then we say that these 2 reduced by approx 1.1 million shares yesterday. Total daily turnover was a little over 10 million shares. So yesterday's great increase was probably mostly due to the BRILLIANT report and not the short sellers' buyback of shares. However, we must still assume that it had an impact. Have a wonderful evening, and enjoy life.
·1 päivä sittenThere is much talk about the danger of future overcapacity in container shipping with rate drops as a result. As previously pointed out several times in the forum, this is a threat that mainly affects the large ocean carriers and not the smaller ships (feeders). A potential opening of Suez will, due to shorter transit times, especially from Asia to Europe, on paper lead to more available capacity. This is undoubtedly true, and more available capacity will in a normal situation lead to rate drops. What analysts and other experts do not seem to take into account are the immediate challenges the industry will face the moment the canal reopens. Everyone saw the chaos that arose when Evergreen put a ship across the canal? It took months to clear all the fully loaded ocean vessels that had accumulated in the canal and which more or less arrived at the transhipment ports in Europe (Rotterdam, Bremerhaven, Antwerp etc.) simultaneously. This led to massive congestion, as the capacity in these ports is already under pressure due to strikes and space challenges, which in turn led to good times for feeder operators. The canal was closed for 6 days... Imagine this scenario; There are 15-20 ships of size 17-23 000 TEUS going from Asia to Europe every week. If/when Suez reopens, in a hypothetical scenario, there will be approximately 15 - 20 ships en route around South Africa and 15-20 ships that will go through Suez. These will hit Europe more or less at the same time. (2 weeks around the Cape, 1 week+ saved via Suez)., The capacity in transhipment Europe is already at breaking point.. My prediction is that this will be complete chaos, with an overflow of volume and long waiting times for unloading. Complete chaos in this context means good times for everyone with ships in the feeder segment and, for that matter, in the ocean segment. History has shown us several times over the last 5-6 years that it takes much longer than one thinks to clear up major disruptions. A bonus in an even longer perspective will be further pressure on rates if ocean vessels remain queued for a longer time in Europe, with the result that there will be a lack of capacity in Asia if they do not make it back to their original schedule.. I think this looks quite promising :)- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWell folks. The update on what the short sellers did yesterday Thursday has arrived. It looks like a lot at first glance. But we who know about Finanstilsynet's "magic" limit won't be fooled Must break down the numbers, then the updates will come shortly
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q3-osavuosiraportti
UUTTA
2 päivää sitten‧50 min
0,5078 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 11.12.
19,09 %Tuotto/v
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·7 t sitten · MuokattuOne way to assess the future of a company is whether it makes many commercial "mistakes", individually perceived or "generally" ascertainable. I am here roughly excluding the freight market as a whole. I don't think the MPCC management makes many mistakes. Then the question is what the share price does - this is perhaps best illustrated by the old stock market image of the diligence (the company) driving along, and the share price as a dog on a long leash. Sometimes ahead and sometimes behind. Normally, I don't focus much on management. But in MPCC's case, I think it's crystal clear what the relevance of management is here.
- ·9 t sitten · MuokattuSorry folks, yesterday's closing was quite hectic. So the post I promised yesterday, comes here now. And the headline will be. The reason for DnB/JØRGEN LIAN's eternal negativity towards MPCC.. I'm very busy today too, so it will be a short version I can come back to the topic later. And the reason for all the negativity/crap is the following in simple terms. Some years ago, MPCC used DnB as its lender .... As most people know, boats are expensive, and financing involves billions. Over the years, we're talking about interest expenses for MPCC and interest income in the 100 million class for DnB... When MPCC chose to use other financing institutions, DnB found this very hard to accept. They were, in short, angry and vengeful. And as a template for the future, the order from the highest level was probably .... We shall not write anything positive about this company. Preferably, we /DnB should come up with at least 1, preferably 2 bad "reviews" during the last week before the Q-report is released. And they have kept the plan.....really. But as MPCC continues to sail with great results, it has become more difficult to find "negativity" about MPCC. You know that I have hinted that JØRGEN LIAN will soon run out of negative angles. And that he will say that the boats are painted the wrong color. That statement has not yet come, but it is approaching. The day before the report, this came from Jørgen. Even though the order book for feeder vessels is smaller than what we see for the entire combined container segment, fleet growth since 2029 (I assume he means 2019) has nevertheless been 30% in a market where volume growth has been 10%... Here I want to congratulate Jørgen a bit, it only took 1.5 years to discover that the order book for feeders is small compared to the larger boat types....Welcome to the party..all the rest of us. So, back to the post. Why doesn't he just say that the order book for the feeder class is from 11 to 13%.???? No, it's about negative commentary /understanding. What does the reader think about the difference between 13% and 30%? I assume everyone understands..... Now we come to JØRGEN LIAN's statement after the report was released. When HE states that the rates' amount and duration are IMPRESSIVE, he is actually saying. DnB/(me Jørgen) has been thoroughly wrong about what has happened since the start of 2024 until today regarding rate-level development within the feeder segment. He just says it in a different way. And is there ONE person here on the medium who believes in the man's stated increase in the share price of 3 to 5% on the news from the report. Can be counted in. And then to the funniest part, DnB/Car increases its estimate from 14,50 kr up to 14,90 kr. Based on the report. I would have liked to see that calculation, which numbers were used JØRGEN ... Have you raised the rate level, or are you still using the rates I have written down, every time you have spoken to the media..???? My calculation versus yours, diverges greatly, to put it nicely.. I look forward to the next "negative" outburst from DnB/Jørgen, because they will come, I can guarantee that.. Spelling is skipped, now it's full speed ahead with something completely different. Have a wonderful weekend everyone, you too Jørgen.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWell folks, then we'll update ourselves on what the short sellers did yesterday (Thursday). And a little exchange of thoughts at the end. I'm setting up the list in a different order today. The total was reduced from 4.17% down to 3.45% = 0.72% (this is not correct) Or from 18.61 million shares down to 15.38 million shares. A reduction of approx. 3.23 million shares. These are also completely wrong numbers.. Due to the Financial Supervisory Authority's rule that positions UNDER 0.5% are not shown or counted in the number of shares. NUMERIC, Citadel A and ACTUS did nothing. Then we take big wolf Marshall W who reduced from 1.50% down to 1.37%=0.13% . Or from 6.67 million down to 6.08 million. A reduction of approx. 589,000 shares. Then we come to Voleon. And here comes the magic of the Financial Supervisory Authority. They stood at 0.59% before yesterday .and now stand at 0....This is obviously not the reality. But we take what we can confirm .... They must have reduced from 0.59% at least down to 0.49% Or by approx. 450,000 shares.. They may have reduced a bit further down but not to zero as the list shows. My tip is a maximum of 150,000 more shares. They have now become a "pike in the reeds" that swims just below the Financial Supervisory Authority's limit, and the chance that they suddenly reappear on the list is great. Then there will be a new list (now with only 4 players. like this.). Marshall W. 1,37% 6,08 mill NUMERIC. 0,90% 4,01 mill ACTUS. 0,61% 2,71 mill Citadel A. 0,57% 2,57. mill TOTALT. 3,45% 15,38 mill. And then we have at least one pike with approx 2 million shares So approx 17.4 million is probably quite close to reality. Then we conclude a bit Marshall W reduced by 589,000 shares and Voleon by approx 500,000 shares Then we say that these 2 reduced by approx 1.1 million shares yesterday. Total daily turnover was a little over 10 million shares. So yesterday's great increase was probably mostly due to the BRILLIANT report and not the short sellers' buyback of shares. However, we must still assume that it had an impact. Have a wonderful evening, and enjoy life.
- ·1 päivä sittenThere is much talk about the danger of future overcapacity in container shipping with rate drops as a result. As previously pointed out several times in the forum, this is a threat that mainly affects the large ocean carriers and not the smaller ships (feeders). A potential opening of Suez will, due to shorter transit times, especially from Asia to Europe, on paper lead to more available capacity. This is undoubtedly true, and more available capacity will in a normal situation lead to rate drops. What analysts and other experts do not seem to take into account are the immediate challenges the industry will face the moment the canal reopens. Everyone saw the chaos that arose when Evergreen put a ship across the canal? It took months to clear all the fully loaded ocean vessels that had accumulated in the canal and which more or less arrived at the transhipment ports in Europe (Rotterdam, Bremerhaven, Antwerp etc.) simultaneously. This led to massive congestion, as the capacity in these ports is already under pressure due to strikes and space challenges, which in turn led to good times for feeder operators. The canal was closed for 6 days... Imagine this scenario; There are 15-20 ships of size 17-23 000 TEUS going from Asia to Europe every week. If/when Suez reopens, in a hypothetical scenario, there will be approximately 15 - 20 ships en route around South Africa and 15-20 ships that will go through Suez. These will hit Europe more or less at the same time. (2 weeks around the Cape, 1 week+ saved via Suez)., The capacity in transhipment Europe is already at breaking point.. My prediction is that this will be complete chaos, with an overflow of volume and long waiting times for unloading. Complete chaos in this context means good times for everyone with ships in the feeder segment and, for that matter, in the ocean segment. History has shown us several times over the last 5-6 years that it takes much longer than one thinks to clear up major disruptions. A bonus in an even longer perspective will be further pressure on rates if ocean vessels remain queued for a longer time in Europe, with the result that there will be a lack of capacity in Asia if they do not make it back to their original schedule.. I think this looks quite promising :)
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWell folks. The update on what the short sellers did yesterday Thursday has arrived. It looks like a lot at first glance. But we who know about Finanstilsynet's "magic" limit won't be fooled Must break down the numbers, then the updates will come shortly
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
3 533
Myynti
Määrä
64
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 14 378 | - | - | ||
| 672 | - | - | ||
| 8 441 | - | - | ||
| 19 | - | - |
Ylin
18,135VWAP
Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
VWAP
Ylin
18,135Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 24.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 27.11. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 26.8. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.5. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 8.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 25.2. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
Q3-osavuosiraportti
UUTTA
2 päivää sitten‧50 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 24.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 27.11. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 26.8. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 22.5. | |
| 2024 Yhtiökokous | 8.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 25.2. |
Datan lähde: Millistream, Quartr
0,5078 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 11.12.
19,09 %Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·7 t sitten · MuokattuOne way to assess the future of a company is whether it makes many commercial "mistakes", individually perceived or "generally" ascertainable. I am here roughly excluding the freight market as a whole. I don't think the MPCC management makes many mistakes. Then the question is what the share price does - this is perhaps best illustrated by the old stock market image of the diligence (the company) driving along, and the share price as a dog on a long leash. Sometimes ahead and sometimes behind. Normally, I don't focus much on management. But in MPCC's case, I think it's crystal clear what the relevance of management is here.
- ·9 t sitten · MuokattuSorry folks, yesterday's closing was quite hectic. So the post I promised yesterday, comes here now. And the headline will be. The reason for DnB/JØRGEN LIAN's eternal negativity towards MPCC.. I'm very busy today too, so it will be a short version I can come back to the topic later. And the reason for all the negativity/crap is the following in simple terms. Some years ago, MPCC used DnB as its lender .... As most people know, boats are expensive, and financing involves billions. Over the years, we're talking about interest expenses for MPCC and interest income in the 100 million class for DnB... When MPCC chose to use other financing institutions, DnB found this very hard to accept. They were, in short, angry and vengeful. And as a template for the future, the order from the highest level was probably .... We shall not write anything positive about this company. Preferably, we /DnB should come up with at least 1, preferably 2 bad "reviews" during the last week before the Q-report is released. And they have kept the plan.....really. But as MPCC continues to sail with great results, it has become more difficult to find "negativity" about MPCC. You know that I have hinted that JØRGEN LIAN will soon run out of negative angles. And that he will say that the boats are painted the wrong color. That statement has not yet come, but it is approaching. The day before the report, this came from Jørgen. Even though the order book for feeder vessels is smaller than what we see for the entire combined container segment, fleet growth since 2029 (I assume he means 2019) has nevertheless been 30% in a market where volume growth has been 10%... Here I want to congratulate Jørgen a bit, it only took 1.5 years to discover that the order book for feeders is small compared to the larger boat types....Welcome to the party..all the rest of us. So, back to the post. Why doesn't he just say that the order book for the feeder class is from 11 to 13%.???? No, it's about negative commentary /understanding. What does the reader think about the difference between 13% and 30%? I assume everyone understands..... Now we come to JØRGEN LIAN's statement after the report was released. When HE states that the rates' amount and duration are IMPRESSIVE, he is actually saying. DnB/(me Jørgen) has been thoroughly wrong about what has happened since the start of 2024 until today regarding rate-level development within the feeder segment. He just says it in a different way. And is there ONE person here on the medium who believes in the man's stated increase in the share price of 3 to 5% on the news from the report. Can be counted in. And then to the funniest part, DnB/Car increases its estimate from 14,50 kr up to 14,90 kr. Based on the report. I would have liked to see that calculation, which numbers were used JØRGEN ... Have you raised the rate level, or are you still using the rates I have written down, every time you have spoken to the media..???? My calculation versus yours, diverges greatly, to put it nicely.. I look forward to the next "negative" outburst from DnB/Jørgen, because they will come, I can guarantee that.. Spelling is skipped, now it's full speed ahead with something completely different. Have a wonderful weekend everyone, you too Jørgen.
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWell folks, then we'll update ourselves on what the short sellers did yesterday (Thursday). And a little exchange of thoughts at the end. I'm setting up the list in a different order today. The total was reduced from 4.17% down to 3.45% = 0.72% (this is not correct) Or from 18.61 million shares down to 15.38 million shares. A reduction of approx. 3.23 million shares. These are also completely wrong numbers.. Due to the Financial Supervisory Authority's rule that positions UNDER 0.5% are not shown or counted in the number of shares. NUMERIC, Citadel A and ACTUS did nothing. Then we take big wolf Marshall W who reduced from 1.50% down to 1.37%=0.13% . Or from 6.67 million down to 6.08 million. A reduction of approx. 589,000 shares. Then we come to Voleon. And here comes the magic of the Financial Supervisory Authority. They stood at 0.59% before yesterday .and now stand at 0....This is obviously not the reality. But we take what we can confirm .... They must have reduced from 0.59% at least down to 0.49% Or by approx. 450,000 shares.. They may have reduced a bit further down but not to zero as the list shows. My tip is a maximum of 150,000 more shares. They have now become a "pike in the reeds" that swims just below the Financial Supervisory Authority's limit, and the chance that they suddenly reappear on the list is great. Then there will be a new list (now with only 4 players. like this.). Marshall W. 1,37% 6,08 mill NUMERIC. 0,90% 4,01 mill ACTUS. 0,61% 2,71 mill Citadel A. 0,57% 2,57. mill TOTALT. 3,45% 15,38 mill. And then we have at least one pike with approx 2 million shares So approx 17.4 million is probably quite close to reality. Then we conclude a bit Marshall W reduced by 589,000 shares and Voleon by approx 500,000 shares Then we say that these 2 reduced by approx 1.1 million shares yesterday. Total daily turnover was a little over 10 million shares. So yesterday's great increase was probably mostly due to the BRILLIANT report and not the short sellers' buyback of shares. However, we must still assume that it had an impact. Have a wonderful evening, and enjoy life.
- ·1 päivä sittenThere is much talk about the danger of future overcapacity in container shipping with rate drops as a result. As previously pointed out several times in the forum, this is a threat that mainly affects the large ocean carriers and not the smaller ships (feeders). A potential opening of Suez will, due to shorter transit times, especially from Asia to Europe, on paper lead to more available capacity. This is undoubtedly true, and more available capacity will in a normal situation lead to rate drops. What analysts and other experts do not seem to take into account are the immediate challenges the industry will face the moment the canal reopens. Everyone saw the chaos that arose when Evergreen put a ship across the canal? It took months to clear all the fully loaded ocean vessels that had accumulated in the canal and which more or less arrived at the transhipment ports in Europe (Rotterdam, Bremerhaven, Antwerp etc.) simultaneously. This led to massive congestion, as the capacity in these ports is already under pressure due to strikes and space challenges, which in turn led to good times for feeder operators. The canal was closed for 6 days... Imagine this scenario; There are 15-20 ships of size 17-23 000 TEUS going from Asia to Europe every week. If/when Suez reopens, in a hypothetical scenario, there will be approximately 15 - 20 ships en route around South Africa and 15-20 ships that will go through Suez. These will hit Europe more or less at the same time. (2 weeks around the Cape, 1 week+ saved via Suez)., The capacity in transhipment Europe is already at breaking point.. My prediction is that this will be complete chaos, with an overflow of volume and long waiting times for unloading. Complete chaos in this context means good times for everyone with ships in the feeder segment and, for that matter, in the ocean segment. History has shown us several times over the last 5-6 years that it takes much longer than one thinks to clear up major disruptions. A bonus in an even longer perspective will be further pressure on rates if ocean vessels remain queued for a longer time in Europe, with the result that there will be a lack of capacity in Asia if they do not make it back to their original schedule.. I think this looks quite promising :)
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuWell folks. The update on what the short sellers did yesterday Thursday has arrived. It looks like a lot at first glance. But we who know about Finanstilsynet's "magic" limit won't be fooled Must break down the numbers, then the updates will come shortly
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
3 533
Myynti
Määrä
64
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 14 378 | - | - | ||
| 672 | - | - | ||
| 8 441 | - | - | ||
| 19 | - | - |
Ylin
18,135VWAP
Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
VWAP
Ylin
18,135Alin
17,465VaihtoMäärä
59 3 285 716
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt