2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
36 päivää sitten
‧46 min
0,3862 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,36%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 27.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 27.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·15 t sittenThat issue should probably be seen in light of a couple of things. Generally, we should have a reasonable level of information. I think we do. Otherwise, it's often the case that: 1. some things we want to hear about? 2. other things we don't want to hear about? It doesn't always make sense to signal/telegraph to all possible market participants at once and in advance, when the rules are as they are? It is, after all, possible to do rights issues/private placements/accelerated book-building etc. we all know that. I do agree, however, that the unexpected is often annoying. But not always? But a good example, I think, could be the recent purchase of the 4 x 7.000 TEU vessels, why? because, 1. if MPCC were to go through a classic rights issue (where all shareholders are offered subscription rights), which is what many would call a reasonably bureaucratic and lengthy process, typically requiring the preparation of a prospectus, approval from financial authorities, and a longer subscription period of several weeks etc. 2. With a prolonged issue, MPCC risks market conditions changing negatively during the subscription period. With a quick process, the price and capital are locked in within a few hours (often "overnight" as we saw), which eliminates the uncertainty of whether the desired amount will be raised. MPCC did that. 3. When the market knows that an issue is coming in, for example, 3 weeks, the market might start to short the stock or sell off to create liquidity to participate or other fun stuff that we investors/speculators might not want to hear about? This quite certainly creates downward pressure on the share price. A quick, closed process possibly limits this window and the effect of negative share price impact/development? Judge for yourself? 4. In MPCC's case, the purpose of the capital raising of 107 mill. $ was to strengthen the balance sheet and create flexibility to pursue further growth opportunities and refinance debt, as I understand it.. When a company like MPCC needs to act quickly to exploit opportunities in the shipping market, or secure new credit, then I think it's better to secure the money/liquidity when the opportunity is there (I expect management can assess the timing better than I?), so they are ready to pay when the need for cash/or credit lines arises, rather than waiting for a slower process with the associated risks? What do I know. 5. I don't entirely agree that it's better to forgo dividends than that we got an issue. That must be an individual assessment. I live off dividends. NB: I am long the stock, and I see the issue as purely positive.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
36 päivää sitten
‧46 min
0,3862 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,36%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·15 t sittenThat issue should probably be seen in light of a couple of things. Generally, we should have a reasonable level of information. I think we do. Otherwise, it's often the case that: 1. some things we want to hear about? 2. other things we don't want to hear about? It doesn't always make sense to signal/telegraph to all possible market participants at once and in advance, when the rules are as they are? It is, after all, possible to do rights issues/private placements/accelerated book-building etc. we all know that. I do agree, however, that the unexpected is often annoying. But not always? But a good example, I think, could be the recent purchase of the 4 x 7.000 TEU vessels, why? because, 1. if MPCC were to go through a classic rights issue (where all shareholders are offered subscription rights), which is what many would call a reasonably bureaucratic and lengthy process, typically requiring the preparation of a prospectus, approval from financial authorities, and a longer subscription period of several weeks etc. 2. With a prolonged issue, MPCC risks market conditions changing negatively during the subscription period. With a quick process, the price and capital are locked in within a few hours (often "overnight" as we saw), which eliminates the uncertainty of whether the desired amount will be raised. MPCC did that. 3. When the market knows that an issue is coming in, for example, 3 weeks, the market might start to short the stock or sell off to create liquidity to participate or other fun stuff that we investors/speculators might not want to hear about? This quite certainly creates downward pressure on the share price. A quick, closed process possibly limits this window and the effect of negative share price impact/development? Judge for yourself? 4. In MPCC's case, the purpose of the capital raising of 107 mill. $ was to strengthen the balance sheet and create flexibility to pursue further growth opportunities and refinance debt, as I understand it.. When a company like MPCC needs to act quickly to exploit opportunities in the shipping market, or secure new credit, then I think it's better to secure the money/liquidity when the opportunity is there (I expect management can assess the timing better than I?), so they are ready to pay when the need for cash/or credit lines arises, rather than waiting for a slower process with the associated risks? What do I know. 5. I don't entirely agree that it's better to forgo dividends than that we got an issue. That must be an individual assessment. I live off dividends. NB: I am long the stock, and I see the issue as purely positive.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 27.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 27.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
36 päivää sitten
‧46 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 27.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 27.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 |
0,3862 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,36%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·15 t sittenThat issue should probably be seen in light of a couple of things. Generally, we should have a reasonable level of information. I think we do. Otherwise, it's often the case that: 1. some things we want to hear about? 2. other things we don't want to hear about? It doesn't always make sense to signal/telegraph to all possible market participants at once and in advance, when the rules are as they are? It is, after all, possible to do rights issues/private placements/accelerated book-building etc. we all know that. I do agree, however, that the unexpected is often annoying. But not always? But a good example, I think, could be the recent purchase of the 4 x 7.000 TEU vessels, why? because, 1. if MPCC were to go through a classic rights issue (where all shareholders are offered subscription rights), which is what many would call a reasonably bureaucratic and lengthy process, typically requiring the preparation of a prospectus, approval from financial authorities, and a longer subscription period of several weeks etc. 2. With a prolonged issue, MPCC risks market conditions changing negatively during the subscription period. With a quick process, the price and capital are locked in within a few hours (often "overnight" as we saw), which eliminates the uncertainty of whether the desired amount will be raised. MPCC did that. 3. When the market knows that an issue is coming in, for example, 3 weeks, the market might start to short the stock or sell off to create liquidity to participate or other fun stuff that we investors/speculators might not want to hear about? This quite certainly creates downward pressure on the share price. A quick, closed process possibly limits this window and the effect of negative share price impact/development? Judge for yourself? 4. In MPCC's case, the purpose of the capital raising of 107 mill. $ was to strengthen the balance sheet and create flexibility to pursue further growth opportunities and refinance debt, as I understand it.. When a company like MPCC needs to act quickly to exploit opportunities in the shipping market, or secure new credit, then I think it's better to secure the money/liquidity when the opportunity is there (I expect management can assess the timing better than I?), so they are ready to pay when the need for cash/or credit lines arises, rather than waiting for a slower process with the associated risks? What do I know. 5. I don't entirely agree that it's better to forgo dividends than that we got an issue. That must be an individual assessment. I live off dividends. NB: I am long the stock, and I see the issue as purely positive.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt