Q2-osavuosiraportti
77 päivää sitten
2,70 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,85 %
Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Xetra
Määrä
Osto
229
Myynti
Määrä
271
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
70,05VWAP
Alin
69,7VaihtoMäärä
0,5 6 692
VWAP
Ylin
70,05Alin
69,7VaihtoMäärä
0,5 6 692
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 12.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 7.8. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 8.7. | |
| 2025 Yhtiökokous | 28.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 13.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 10.3. |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
12.10.·I believe there may be hope ahead in that Egnsinvest expects a revaluation of values due to greater demand for German properties. Preliminary key figures for Q3 2025 The result before exchange rate and value adjustments (EBVAT) is expected to amount to DKK 4.7 million in Q3 2025 and thus follows the expectations previously announced. The fulfillment of the expectations is due to the fact that the company has managed to implement rent increases and achieve low vacancy. EgnsINVEST Ejendomme Tyskland A/S also narrows the interval for the expectations for the total EBVAT at the end of the year to be DKK 15.0 to 16.0 million. In connection with refinancing, the company has converted Euribor3 loans to loans with a longer interest rate fixation, which is the reason for the adjusted announcement. The company expects a positive adjustment of the property values of DKK 4.8 million. in Q3 2025, which comes in a period with unchanged return requirements. This means that DKK 13.9 million has been value adjusted year to date based on the high demand for the company's leases and the possibility of raising the rent.
7.10.·from 95 to 66. Isn't that just drastic enough, despite one year's profit?
10.10.·How do you distinguish a dog/value trap from a cheap value stock? Often missed buying something like this. The latest macro figures from Germany were terrible and the German consumers are not exactly in a great mood for discretionary consumption and the long-term interest rate is going up on large loans to finance inv infra, energy transition and defense. My expensive experience is that cheap can become cheaper and needs a clear trigger for a turnaround. What are the triggers here? Must understand them to know about deep diving into the case. Good luck to you inside
22.9. · Muokattu·Are there any Danes who own this share, have received dividends and applied for a refund from the German tax authorities? It seems like a somewhat cumbersome process and I would like to hear from someone who has been through it.
22.9.·Hi Kaamads I didn't have a very large portfolio at the time of the X-day, so I haven't put much effort into it so far. However, you have the option of receiving shares instead of dividends, so I THINK you won't have to worry about dividend tax. People with more experience in this area would be happy to give their input.- 19.9.·LEG has become my largest position in the portfolio over the past month, as I see the current price level of €66.4 compared to the future prospects as being extremely advantageous. IMO, the case is similar to the Jyske Bank case towards the end of last year, where the Jyske Bank price was down to DKK 465. The main reasons for this are: - the expected Liquidity from operations after investment in future growth AFFO is 215-225 million for 2025, corresponding to €2.95 per share. AFFO is currently distributed as dividend, which, all other things being equal, ensures a dividend of 4.45% per year. - Net asset value per share is €103.3. All other things being equal, there is therefore a 55% increase potential before the company is traded at net asset value. - NTA per share is €131, which as I understand it is net asset value when deferred tax on value adjustments of the property portfolio is not taken into account. Therefore, NTA represents the value a new company must pay if they purchase the properties individually in the market. (what must be paid in the market to restore the cash flow from operations the company has) Thorleif Jackson has shown graphs in an older article on the shareholders' association that indicate that LEG has historically traded close to NTA, if this is the case, there is almost 100% upside potential. - I expect that LEG can maintain an LFL growth in rent of 3% per year. which, with an unchanged return requirement on the properties, all else being equal, will result in an increase in net worth of 6% (at 50% leverage) alone on the value adjustment of the property portfolio. In addition, there is the operating profit for the company. Therefore, I expect a value creation in the company in this scenario of 10-12% per year. - In the second half of 2024 and the first half of 2025, there have been positive value adjustments on the property portfolio, but the value adjustments have been smaller than the LFL increase in rental income, which I interpret as meaning that the capital return requirement has continued to increase/under pressure during this period. - LEG has 17% of the portfolio that is under rent restriction. According to the company, there is an upside to market rent of 61% on these properties. 60% of these properties will transition to market rent in 2028. Events that could cause the share to rise: - The 2025 financial statements will likely be the first financial statements with a positive result in recent years. - Synergies from the acquired property company will only really come into play next year. - The utilization of rental potential from 2028 onwards. The most significant risk as I see it concerns the future interest rate level in Europe. LEG has very low financing costs at present, and even with the current interest rate level, there is a prospect of increasing financing costs in the company. I am not too worried about the impact of interest rate developments on operating profit in the coming years, but interest rate developments have a major impact on the valuation of the properties. Negative value adjustments could quickly destroy the company's positive result, at the same time it could pressure the company's creditworthiness and thus further pressure future financing costs. As can be seen from the above, I am very bullish on this, and would therefore like some input on the risk factors you see in the short and long term for the share. At the same time, I would like some critical eyes on my partial conclusions and interpretations. As I have mentioned previously, I own the share, and the post is not a purchase recommendation but rather a proposal for a more nuanced debate on the company's opportunities and risks.
22.9.·Thanks for a good post with substance! I largely agree with your observations. and generally believe that the real estate sector in Europe is undervalued (maybe except for France and the UK, which I am a little cautious about). If I had to make a counterargument, then LEG should sell some of their properties when the share price and NTA deviate so much from each other. When/if they don't do that (and Vonovia, for example, has sold quite a few properties over the last few years), then explanations could be 1) that the properties are actually not worth that much in today's trading, or 2) that there is a bit of empire building on the part of the management (wrapped up as economies of scale and short-term market imbalances). As investors, we should ask ourselves - and perhaps the management - whether any of these are at play? I am currently a long-term buyer of European real estate companies with centrally located properties, but there is also something about timing, and it cannot be denied that rising long-term interest rates can cause some turbulence in the short term,23.9.·I agree with your thinking, as selling properties at market value and using the proceeds for share buybacks will ensure shareholders have a larger property base per share. From the company's perspective, however, I can understand that they are not selling more than necessary at current prices. I believe LEG has succeeded in blowing the whistle. In the period 1/1 2024 -30/6 2025, they have sold a total of 4,600 units located in areas where they do not believe they can achieve economies of scale, at prices that at least correspond to the property valuations. The proceeds have been used to acquire another property company with 9,000 units (at a discount compared to the property valuation). LEG still has 5,000 units for sale in areas they no longer want to focus on, and these units will also only be sold if the property valuation is achieved. The interest rate level is also my biggest concern. The 10-year German interest rate has increased by 0.6% points this year, while the 3-month interest rate has fallen by 1.5% points in the same period, so there is probably no doubt that it is the fear of rising interest rates that is weighing on the stock. 
17.9.·The dear podcast millionaire club speaks highly of this stock, but it has been on a downward trend for a long time. Do people see a possible turnaround with lower interest rates in sight?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q2-osavuosiraportti
77 päivää sitten
2,70 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,85 %
Tuotto/v
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 12.10.·I believe there may be hope ahead in that Egnsinvest expects a revaluation of values due to greater demand for German properties. Preliminary key figures for Q3 2025 The result before exchange rate and value adjustments (EBVAT) is expected to amount to DKK 4.7 million in Q3 2025 and thus follows the expectations previously announced. The fulfillment of the expectations is due to the fact that the company has managed to implement rent increases and achieve low vacancy. EgnsINVEST Ejendomme Tyskland A/S also narrows the interval for the expectations for the total EBVAT at the end of the year to be DKK 15.0 to 16.0 million. In connection with refinancing, the company has converted Euribor3 loans to loans with a longer interest rate fixation, which is the reason for the adjusted announcement. The company expects a positive adjustment of the property values of DKK 4.8 million. in Q3 2025, which comes in a period with unchanged return requirements. This means that DKK 13.9 million has been value adjusted year to date based on the high demand for the company's leases and the possibility of raising the rent.
- 7.10.·from 95 to 66. Isn't that just drastic enough, despite one year's profit?10.10.·How do you distinguish a dog/value trap from a cheap value stock? Often missed buying something like this. The latest macro figures from Germany were terrible and the German consumers are not exactly in a great mood for discretionary consumption and the long-term interest rate is going up on large loans to finance inv infra, energy transition and defense. My expensive experience is that cheap can become cheaper and needs a clear trigger for a turnaround. What are the triggers here? Must understand them to know about deep diving into the case. Good luck to you inside
- 22.9. · Muokattu·Are there any Danes who own this share, have received dividends and applied for a refund from the German tax authorities? It seems like a somewhat cumbersome process and I would like to hear from someone who has been through it.22.9.·Hi Kaamads I didn't have a very large portfolio at the time of the X-day, so I haven't put much effort into it so far. However, you have the option of receiving shares instead of dividends, so I THINK you won't have to worry about dividend tax. People with more experience in this area would be happy to give their input.
- 19.9.·LEG has become my largest position in the portfolio over the past month, as I see the current price level of €66.4 compared to the future prospects as being extremely advantageous. IMO, the case is similar to the Jyske Bank case towards the end of last year, where the Jyske Bank price was down to DKK 465. The main reasons for this are: - the expected Liquidity from operations after investment in future growth AFFO is 215-225 million for 2025, corresponding to €2.95 per share. AFFO is currently distributed as dividend, which, all other things being equal, ensures a dividend of 4.45% per year. - Net asset value per share is €103.3. All other things being equal, there is therefore a 55% increase potential before the company is traded at net asset value. - NTA per share is €131, which as I understand it is net asset value when deferred tax on value adjustments of the property portfolio is not taken into account. Therefore, NTA represents the value a new company must pay if they purchase the properties individually in the market. (what must be paid in the market to restore the cash flow from operations the company has) Thorleif Jackson has shown graphs in an older article on the shareholders' association that indicate that LEG has historically traded close to NTA, if this is the case, there is almost 100% upside potential. - I expect that LEG can maintain an LFL growth in rent of 3% per year. which, with an unchanged return requirement on the properties, all else being equal, will result in an increase in net worth of 6% (at 50% leverage) alone on the value adjustment of the property portfolio. In addition, there is the operating profit for the company. Therefore, I expect a value creation in the company in this scenario of 10-12% per year. - In the second half of 2024 and the first half of 2025, there have been positive value adjustments on the property portfolio, but the value adjustments have been smaller than the LFL increase in rental income, which I interpret as meaning that the capital return requirement has continued to increase/under pressure during this period. - LEG has 17% of the portfolio that is under rent restriction. According to the company, there is an upside to market rent of 61% on these properties. 60% of these properties will transition to market rent in 2028. Events that could cause the share to rise: - The 2025 financial statements will likely be the first financial statements with a positive result in recent years. - Synergies from the acquired property company will only really come into play next year. - The utilization of rental potential from 2028 onwards. The most significant risk as I see it concerns the future interest rate level in Europe. LEG has very low financing costs at present, and even with the current interest rate level, there is a prospect of increasing financing costs in the company. I am not too worried about the impact of interest rate developments on operating profit in the coming years, but interest rate developments have a major impact on the valuation of the properties. Negative value adjustments could quickly destroy the company's positive result, at the same time it could pressure the company's creditworthiness and thus further pressure future financing costs. As can be seen from the above, I am very bullish on this, and would therefore like some input on the risk factors you see in the short and long term for the share. At the same time, I would like some critical eyes on my partial conclusions and interpretations. As I have mentioned previously, I own the share, and the post is not a purchase recommendation but rather a proposal for a more nuanced debate on the company's opportunities and risks.22.9.·Thanks for a good post with substance! I largely agree with your observations. and generally believe that the real estate sector in Europe is undervalued (maybe except for France and the UK, which I am a little cautious about). If I had to make a counterargument, then LEG should sell some of their properties when the share price and NTA deviate so much from each other. When/if they don't do that (and Vonovia, for example, has sold quite a few properties over the last few years), then explanations could be 1) that the properties are actually not worth that much in today's trading, or 2) that there is a bit of empire building on the part of the management (wrapped up as economies of scale and short-term market imbalances). As investors, we should ask ourselves - and perhaps the management - whether any of these are at play? I am currently a long-term buyer of European real estate companies with centrally located properties, but there is also something about timing, and it cannot be denied that rising long-term interest rates can cause some turbulence in the short term,23.9.·I agree with your thinking, as selling properties at market value and using the proceeds for share buybacks will ensure shareholders have a larger property base per share. From the company's perspective, however, I can understand that they are not selling more than necessary at current prices. I believe LEG has succeeded in blowing the whistle. In the period 1/1 2024 -30/6 2025, they have sold a total of 4,600 units located in areas where they do not believe they can achieve economies of scale, at prices that at least correspond to the property valuations. The proceeds have been used to acquire another property company with 9,000 units (at a discount compared to the property valuation). LEG still has 5,000 units for sale in areas they no longer want to focus on, and these units will also only be sold if the property valuation is achieved. The interest rate level is also my biggest concern. The 10-year German interest rate has increased by 0.6% points this year, while the 3-month interest rate has fallen by 1.5% points in the same period, so there is probably no doubt that it is the fear of rising interest rates that is weighing on the stock.
- 17.9.·The dear podcast millionaire club speaks highly of this stock, but it has been on a downward trend for a long time. Do people see a possible turnaround with lower interest rates in sight?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Xetra
Määrä
Osto
229
Myynti
Määrä
271
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
70,05VWAP
Alin
69,7VaihtoMäärä
0,5 6 692
VWAP
Ylin
70,05Alin
69,7VaihtoMäärä
0,5 6 692
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 12.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 7.8. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 8.7. | |
| 2025 Yhtiökokous | 28.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 13.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 10.3. |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
Q2-osavuosiraportti
77 päivää sitten
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 12.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 7.8. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 8.7. | |
| 2025 Yhtiökokous | 28.5. | |
| 2025 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 13.5. | |
| 2024 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 10.3. |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
2,70 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,85 %
Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 12.10.·I believe there may be hope ahead in that Egnsinvest expects a revaluation of values due to greater demand for German properties. Preliminary key figures for Q3 2025 The result before exchange rate and value adjustments (EBVAT) is expected to amount to DKK 4.7 million in Q3 2025 and thus follows the expectations previously announced. The fulfillment of the expectations is due to the fact that the company has managed to implement rent increases and achieve low vacancy. EgnsINVEST Ejendomme Tyskland A/S also narrows the interval for the expectations for the total EBVAT at the end of the year to be DKK 15.0 to 16.0 million. In connection with refinancing, the company has converted Euribor3 loans to loans with a longer interest rate fixation, which is the reason for the adjusted announcement. The company expects a positive adjustment of the property values of DKK 4.8 million. in Q3 2025, which comes in a period with unchanged return requirements. This means that DKK 13.9 million has been value adjusted year to date based on the high demand for the company's leases and the possibility of raising the rent.
- 7.10.·from 95 to 66. Isn't that just drastic enough, despite one year's profit?10.10.·How do you distinguish a dog/value trap from a cheap value stock? Often missed buying something like this. The latest macro figures from Germany were terrible and the German consumers are not exactly in a great mood for discretionary consumption and the long-term interest rate is going up on large loans to finance inv infra, energy transition and defense. My expensive experience is that cheap can become cheaper and needs a clear trigger for a turnaround. What are the triggers here? Must understand them to know about deep diving into the case. Good luck to you inside
- 22.9. · Muokattu·Are there any Danes who own this share, have received dividends and applied for a refund from the German tax authorities? It seems like a somewhat cumbersome process and I would like to hear from someone who has been through it.22.9.·Hi Kaamads I didn't have a very large portfolio at the time of the X-day, so I haven't put much effort into it so far. However, you have the option of receiving shares instead of dividends, so I THINK you won't have to worry about dividend tax. People with more experience in this area would be happy to give their input.
- 19.9.·LEG has become my largest position in the portfolio over the past month, as I see the current price level of €66.4 compared to the future prospects as being extremely advantageous. IMO, the case is similar to the Jyske Bank case towards the end of last year, where the Jyske Bank price was down to DKK 465. The main reasons for this are: - the expected Liquidity from operations after investment in future growth AFFO is 215-225 million for 2025, corresponding to €2.95 per share. AFFO is currently distributed as dividend, which, all other things being equal, ensures a dividend of 4.45% per year. - Net asset value per share is €103.3. All other things being equal, there is therefore a 55% increase potential before the company is traded at net asset value. - NTA per share is €131, which as I understand it is net asset value when deferred tax on value adjustments of the property portfolio is not taken into account. Therefore, NTA represents the value a new company must pay if they purchase the properties individually in the market. (what must be paid in the market to restore the cash flow from operations the company has) Thorleif Jackson has shown graphs in an older article on the shareholders' association that indicate that LEG has historically traded close to NTA, if this is the case, there is almost 100% upside potential. - I expect that LEG can maintain an LFL growth in rent of 3% per year. which, with an unchanged return requirement on the properties, all else being equal, will result in an increase in net worth of 6% (at 50% leverage) alone on the value adjustment of the property portfolio. In addition, there is the operating profit for the company. Therefore, I expect a value creation in the company in this scenario of 10-12% per year. - In the second half of 2024 and the first half of 2025, there have been positive value adjustments on the property portfolio, but the value adjustments have been smaller than the LFL increase in rental income, which I interpret as meaning that the capital return requirement has continued to increase/under pressure during this period. - LEG has 17% of the portfolio that is under rent restriction. According to the company, there is an upside to market rent of 61% on these properties. 60% of these properties will transition to market rent in 2028. Events that could cause the share to rise: - The 2025 financial statements will likely be the first financial statements with a positive result in recent years. - Synergies from the acquired property company will only really come into play next year. - The utilization of rental potential from 2028 onwards. The most significant risk as I see it concerns the future interest rate level in Europe. LEG has very low financing costs at present, and even with the current interest rate level, there is a prospect of increasing financing costs in the company. I am not too worried about the impact of interest rate developments on operating profit in the coming years, but interest rate developments have a major impact on the valuation of the properties. Negative value adjustments could quickly destroy the company's positive result, at the same time it could pressure the company's creditworthiness and thus further pressure future financing costs. As can be seen from the above, I am very bullish on this, and would therefore like some input on the risk factors you see in the short and long term for the share. At the same time, I would like some critical eyes on my partial conclusions and interpretations. As I have mentioned previously, I own the share, and the post is not a purchase recommendation but rather a proposal for a more nuanced debate on the company's opportunities and risks.22.9.·Thanks for a good post with substance! I largely agree with your observations. and generally believe that the real estate sector in Europe is undervalued (maybe except for France and the UK, which I am a little cautious about). If I had to make a counterargument, then LEG should sell some of their properties when the share price and NTA deviate so much from each other. When/if they don't do that (and Vonovia, for example, has sold quite a few properties over the last few years), then explanations could be 1) that the properties are actually not worth that much in today's trading, or 2) that there is a bit of empire building on the part of the management (wrapped up as economies of scale and short-term market imbalances). As investors, we should ask ourselves - and perhaps the management - whether any of these are at play? I am currently a long-term buyer of European real estate companies with centrally located properties, but there is also something about timing, and it cannot be denied that rising long-term interest rates can cause some turbulence in the short term,23.9.·I agree with your thinking, as selling properties at market value and using the proceeds for share buybacks will ensure shareholders have a larger property base per share. From the company's perspective, however, I can understand that they are not selling more than necessary at current prices. I believe LEG has succeeded in blowing the whistle. In the period 1/1 2024 -30/6 2025, they have sold a total of 4,600 units located in areas where they do not believe they can achieve economies of scale, at prices that at least correspond to the property valuations. The proceeds have been used to acquire another property company with 9,000 units (at a discount compared to the property valuation). LEG still has 5,000 units for sale in areas they no longer want to focus on, and these units will also only be sold if the property valuation is achieved. The interest rate level is also my biggest concern. The 10-year German interest rate has increased by 0.6% points this year, while the 3-month interest rate has fallen by 1.5% points in the same period, so there is probably no doubt that it is the fear of rising interest rates that is weighing on the stock.
- 17.9.·The dear podcast millionaire club speaks highly of this stock, but it has been on a downward trend for a long time. Do people see a possible turnaround with lower interest rates in sight?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Xetra
Määrä
Osto
229
Myynti
Määrä
271
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
70,05VWAP
Alin
69,7VaihtoMäärä
0,5 6 692
VWAP
Ylin
70,05Alin
69,7VaihtoMäärä
0,5 6 692
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt