2026 H1 - tulosraportti
22 päivää sitten
‧45 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 1 023 | - | - | ||
| 12 083 | - | - | ||
| 3 504 | - | - | ||
| 4 513 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H2 - tulosraportti 26.2.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H1 - tulosraportti 28.8. | ||
2025 H2 - tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 H1 - tulosraportti 29.8.2025 | ||
2024 H2 - tulosraportti 26.2.2025 | ||
2024 H1 - tulosraportti 30.8.2024 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·14 t sitten · Muokattuguynextdoor7 I honestly think that analysis is far too contrived. You start with a bearish Elliott Wave scenario and then build a lot of levels on top, which in practice can be drawn in several different ways. When you simultaneously don't own the stock and clearly want to buy lower, it's hard not to get the impression that the analysis also very conveniently fits your own desire for a lower price. Pointing to 2.80, 2.00 and all the way down towards 1.60 solely based on wave theory seems very speculative in a small, news-driven stock like Thor. A strong announcement about sales, deliveries or production can change the whole picture in one day. So I simply don't buy the premise that the stock "must" go significantly lower before it can rise again. It's one possible technical narrative — not a definitive answer.
Of course it's fabricated when it's not positive😂 As said before, you just have to enjoy the (down)ride.
15 t sittenThor Medical ASA (TRMED) – Elliott Wave and Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis Thor Medical may have completed a major first wave at NOK 7.03, but the technical picture now points toward a corrective phase before the next sustainable advance. Because the listed company was previously Nordic Nanovector, I consider the NOK 0.639 low from 2023 the most relevant starting point for the present Thor Medical structure. Elliott Wave structure The advance from NOK 0.639 to NOK 7.03 can be counted as five waves. However, wave (4) overlaps wave (1), meaning it cannot be classified as a conventional impulse. The more appropriate interpretation is a possible leading diagonal forming major wave ①. The reversal from NOK 7.03 may therefore represent the beginning of major wave ②. Leading diagonals are frequently followed by relatively deep second-wave corrections. Market structure The daily and weekly charts currently show an important timeframe transition: * Daily swing trend: bearish * Daily internal trend: bearish * Last daily event: bearish Swing CHoCH * Weekly swing and internal trends: still bullish * Last weekly event: bullish BOS * Both timeframes registered a buy-side liquidity sweep before the reversal The daily structure has therefore confirmed a bearish shift, while the weekly structure has not yet officially turned bearish. The decisive weekly level is approximately NOK 3.98–4.05. A confirmed weekly close below this area would produce stronger evidence that major wave ② is underway. Anchored Volume Profile The profile is anchored from the 2023 low to the NOK 7.03 high and uses the current Thor Medical price structure: * VAH: approximately NOK 5.7–5.9 * POC: approximately NOK 4.55–4.65 * Secondary HVN: approximately NOK 2.6–2.83 * VAL: approximately NOK 1.85–1.95 The current price of NOK 4.605 is positioned almost exactly at the POC. This means the market is presently near its main accepted price and has not yet selected a clear longer-term direction. Acceptance below the POC, followed by a weekly break below NOK 3.98, would favour rotation toward the secondary HVN around NOK 2.6–2.83. Liquidity and volumetric order blocks The nearest important demand area is around NOK 3.70–4.05, where weekly liquidity, a Buy OB and the NOK 3.99 Fibonacci level converge. A deeper and potentially more important demand area is around NOK 1.47–1.70. This zone combines: * Weekly liquidity * Previous wave-(4) territory * The logarithmic 0.618 retracement at NOK 1.598 The first significant overhead Sell OB is around NOK 10–12. Additional supply is visible around NOK 18–22 and at higher historical levels. WaveTrend Momentum supports an early corrective phase: * Daily WaveTrend is bearish and below zero, although not deeply oversold. * Weekly WaveTrend is bearish, with the fast line below the signal line and a negative histogram. * Monthly WaveTrend remains marginally positive but has flattened near the upper region following a SELL warning. This suggests that the correction is confirmed on the lower timeframe, developing on the weekly timeframe and not yet fully confirmed on the monthly chart. Preferred corrective scenario My current preferred path is: 1. Weekly acceptance below NOK 3.98–4.05 2. Wave A toward NOK 2.45–2.83 3. Wave B rebound toward NOK 4.0–4.65, potentially NOK 5.36 4. Bearish continuation below the wave-A low 5. Wave C toward NOK 1.85–2.12 6. Possible final liquidity sweep toward NOK 1.598 NOK 1.598 should be viewed as a deeper sweep target rather than a guaranteed destination. For a confirmed wave-② bottom, I would want to see a liquidity sweep followed by a reclaim, bullish CHoCH and BOS, a confirmed Buy OB with volume expansion and bullish WaveTrend divergence. Bullish alternative If NOK 3.98–4.05 holds and price subsequently reclaims: * NOK 5.36 * VAH around NOK 5.7–5.9 * NOK 7.03 then the correction may remain considerably shallower. A sustained breakout above NOK 7.03 would require the Elliott count to be advanced or revised. Long-term outlook After a confirmed wave-② completion and a new breakout above NOK 7.03, the more defensible wave-③ objectives would initially be: * NOK 11–14 * Extended target around NOK 18–21 The much higher logarithmic projections around NOK 80 and NOK 200 remain highly speculative and should not be treated as active targets before the lower Sell OBs and resistance zones have been decisively absorbed. Conclusion The long-term potential remains bullish, but the shorter-term evidence currently favours correction: Daily structure is bearish, weekly momentum is bearish, but weekly price structure remains technically bullish until NOK 3.98–4.05 is broken. The market’s reaction around NOK 4.00 will likely determine whether Thor Medical forms a shallow correction or develops the larger ABC wave-② structure shown on the chart. This is my personal technical interpretation and not financial advice.
Since I invested and follow this, I provided some info to AI. Asked it to include the latest events and the Last year/day chart. It shows momentum is negative. Also a comment with a picture from guynextdoor7. Here is the answer: I actually strongly agree with your main point: right now, I think it's a bit early to draw the big conclusion. The technical picture has clearly weakened, but we have also had an extreme amount of company-specific noise in a very short time. And when I look at both your charts and the analysis from the forum, I would distinguish quite clearly between what is useful technical information and what becomes a bit too much Elliott fantasy. 😅 First: the price has actually done exactly what we expected After the share issue at 4.80, the share has now moved down towards the 4.60–4.75 area. The last trading days show, among other things, 4.60 → 4.74 → 4.73, with quite significant volume. This tells me first and foremost that the market is still digesting the share issue. 4.80 is now a very clear reference point, but that doesn't mean it will automatically hold. At the same time, I think it's too early to say that the long-term trend is broken. ⸻ The technical picture right now Here, I think the forum analysis hits quite well on the short horizon: * daily momentum is bearish * MACD has turned down * the share is below the shorter moving averages * RSI has cooled down significantly from the top * it has fallen from 7.03 to around 4.6–4.7 So yes: momentum has left TRMED in the short term. But that doesn't necessarily mean we have started an enormous ABC correction. Those are two completely different statements. The level I'm watching most closely I actually like the forum's 3.98–4.05 as an important level. Not because Elliott Wave tells us the share should go there, but because it's an area where the price structure has previously worked. I would think roughly like this: 4.60–4.70: Current area. Buyers need to start showing up here. 4.80: The issue price. Very interesting reference, but not necessarily support. 5.00–5.15: First sign that the share is starting to regain strength. 5.35–5.40: More interesting technical confirmation. 3.98–4.05: The really important area. A clear break below this would significantly change my technical picture. And here I agree more with the forum analysis than I usually do with Elliott Wave: I would much rather see what the market actually does around 4 kroner than start projecting 2.83 → 2.12 → 1.60. 😅 ⸻ I would take the Elliott analysis with a big pinch of salt 🧂 There's one thing in the analysis that I think is a bit too bombastic: "Wave C towards 1.85–2.12" and further possibility of 1.598. It can be drawn on the chart, yes. But that's not the same as the market having given us proof that it will happen. Elliott Wave is very useful as a scenario tool, in my opinion. But when one starts using many historical Fibonacci levels and a 2023 bottom at 0.639 to create price targets many years into the future, the uncertainty becomes enormous. I would therefore treat: 1.60 / 2.0 / 2.8 as hypothetical scenarios – not price targets. ⸻ And then comes the most important thing: THE FUNDAMENTALS have changed This is why I think it's too early to conclude. Since the end of August, we have received: AlphaOne in commercial production → first customer delivery → H1 → 300 mill. share issue → USA initiative → new share capital → Scatec settlement. That's quite a lot in three weeks. 😅 And the share issue at 4.80 was actually oversubscribed several times, while 300 mill. is intended to finance, among other things, US establishment, downstream Pb-212 production, commercial infrastructure, and raw material access. So I think it's wrong to look at the chart as if this is still the same company/case as before the 7-kroner rally. There has been a fundamental capitalization of the company. ⸻ What I would do now And here, I actually think what you said yourself is the best analysis: "Things need to calm down before one can see which way forward." Yep. 100 %. 🤠 I wouldn't try to guess if the next big move comes from 4.60, 4.05, or 3.50. I would wait for the chart to give us information. Scenario A – bullish 4.60–4.70 holds → 4.80 is regained → 5.00 is broken → higher volume. Then I start to believe that the market has absorbed the share issue. Scenario B – sideways 4.50–5.00 for a few weeks. This is actually my favorite scenario right now. It would be healthy. The market gets to digest the share issue, new shares get established owners, and the company can start delivering on what was actually financed. Scenario C – bearish 4.60 breaks → 4.40/4.20 breaks → 3.98–4.05 is broken on a weekly basis. Then the forum analysis's more bearish scenario becomes much more relevant. But we are not there yet. ⸻ And one more thing that I think is important for us: I found no newer Thor announcement after September 11 confirming that the repair issue has actually been completed. Thor has so far announced the intention for up to 9.4 million shares at 4.80, and it is, among other things, contingent on market price and necessary corporate decisions. So right here, I wouldn't do anything until we have the final announcement.- ·16 t sittenThor Medical is gearing up for growth AlphaOne is in commercial operation, and the company will now scale production and operations. The hunt for a commercial CFO with capital market experience shows clear ambitions – with both growth and profitability in focus. No confirmation on AlphaTwo or a new share issue, but the next proof must be increased deliveries, revenues, and better cash flow. Source: Økonomi24, September 15, 2026.
- ·21 t sittenI thought about it when I looked at the chart and realized why 4.6 might be hit. 4.6 was hit a few days ago too, before it reacted upwards shortly after (yes, it went a little below). The peak at ~7.1 kroner looks like the left shoulder in an inverse head-and-shoulders formation. 4.6-4.8-4.6 again becomes the "head" and if it maintains itself the way I see it, then it could become a reality that it will go up towards 7kr to complete this. In addition, volume is mainly lower around bottoms and high around tops (excluding the emission shares at 4.8). This is a somewhat speculative theory, like everything else here in the stock market. It might still be worth thinking about, since investor psychology likes patterns.
·23 t sittenNice to pick up some shares at these levels.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 H1 - tulosraportti
22 päivää sitten
‧45 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·14 t sitten · Muokattuguynextdoor7 I honestly think that analysis is far too contrived. You start with a bearish Elliott Wave scenario and then build a lot of levels on top, which in practice can be drawn in several different ways. When you simultaneously don't own the stock and clearly want to buy lower, it's hard not to get the impression that the analysis also very conveniently fits your own desire for a lower price. Pointing to 2.80, 2.00 and all the way down towards 1.60 solely based on wave theory seems very speculative in a small, news-driven stock like Thor. A strong announcement about sales, deliveries or production can change the whole picture in one day. So I simply don't buy the premise that the stock "must" go significantly lower before it can rise again. It's one possible technical narrative — not a definitive answer.Of course it's fabricated when it's not positive😂 As said before, you just have to enjoy the (down)ride.
- 15 t sittenThor Medical ASA (TRMED) – Elliott Wave and Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis Thor Medical may have completed a major first wave at NOK 7.03, but the technical picture now points toward a corrective phase before the next sustainable advance. Because the listed company was previously Nordic Nanovector, I consider the NOK 0.639 low from 2023 the most relevant starting point for the present Thor Medical structure. Elliott Wave structure The advance from NOK 0.639 to NOK 7.03 can be counted as five waves. However, wave (4) overlaps wave (1), meaning it cannot be classified as a conventional impulse. The more appropriate interpretation is a possible leading diagonal forming major wave ①. The reversal from NOK 7.03 may therefore represent the beginning of major wave ②. Leading diagonals are frequently followed by relatively deep second-wave corrections. Market structure The daily and weekly charts currently show an important timeframe transition: * Daily swing trend: bearish * Daily internal trend: bearish * Last daily event: bearish Swing CHoCH * Weekly swing and internal trends: still bullish * Last weekly event: bullish BOS * Both timeframes registered a buy-side liquidity sweep before the reversal The daily structure has therefore confirmed a bearish shift, while the weekly structure has not yet officially turned bearish. The decisive weekly level is approximately NOK 3.98–4.05. A confirmed weekly close below this area would produce stronger evidence that major wave ② is underway. Anchored Volume Profile The profile is anchored from the 2023 low to the NOK 7.03 high and uses the current Thor Medical price structure: * VAH: approximately NOK 5.7–5.9 * POC: approximately NOK 4.55–4.65 * Secondary HVN: approximately NOK 2.6–2.83 * VAL: approximately NOK 1.85–1.95 The current price of NOK 4.605 is positioned almost exactly at the POC. This means the market is presently near its main accepted price and has not yet selected a clear longer-term direction. Acceptance below the POC, followed by a weekly break below NOK 3.98, would favour rotation toward the secondary HVN around NOK 2.6–2.83. Liquidity and volumetric order blocks The nearest important demand area is around NOK 3.70–4.05, where weekly liquidity, a Buy OB and the NOK 3.99 Fibonacci level converge. A deeper and potentially more important demand area is around NOK 1.47–1.70. This zone combines: * Weekly liquidity * Previous wave-(4) territory * The logarithmic 0.618 retracement at NOK 1.598 The first significant overhead Sell OB is around NOK 10–12. Additional supply is visible around NOK 18–22 and at higher historical levels. WaveTrend Momentum supports an early corrective phase: * Daily WaveTrend is bearish and below zero, although not deeply oversold. * Weekly WaveTrend is bearish, with the fast line below the signal line and a negative histogram. * Monthly WaveTrend remains marginally positive but has flattened near the upper region following a SELL warning. This suggests that the correction is confirmed on the lower timeframe, developing on the weekly timeframe and not yet fully confirmed on the monthly chart. Preferred corrective scenario My current preferred path is: 1. Weekly acceptance below NOK 3.98–4.05 2. Wave A toward NOK 2.45–2.83 3. Wave B rebound toward NOK 4.0–4.65, potentially NOK 5.36 4. Bearish continuation below the wave-A low 5. Wave C toward NOK 1.85–2.12 6. Possible final liquidity sweep toward NOK 1.598 NOK 1.598 should be viewed as a deeper sweep target rather than a guaranteed destination. For a confirmed wave-② bottom, I would want to see a liquidity sweep followed by a reclaim, bullish CHoCH and BOS, a confirmed Buy OB with volume expansion and bullish WaveTrend divergence. Bullish alternative If NOK 3.98–4.05 holds and price subsequently reclaims: * NOK 5.36 * VAH around NOK 5.7–5.9 * NOK 7.03 then the correction may remain considerably shallower. A sustained breakout above NOK 7.03 would require the Elliott count to be advanced or revised. Long-term outlook After a confirmed wave-② completion and a new breakout above NOK 7.03, the more defensible wave-③ objectives would initially be: * NOK 11–14 * Extended target around NOK 18–21 The much higher logarithmic projections around NOK 80 and NOK 200 remain highly speculative and should not be treated as active targets before the lower Sell OBs and resistance zones have been decisively absorbed. Conclusion The long-term potential remains bullish, but the shorter-term evidence currently favours correction: Daily structure is bearish, weekly momentum is bearish, but weekly price structure remains technically bullish until NOK 3.98–4.05 is broken. The market’s reaction around NOK 4.00 will likely determine whether Thor Medical forms a shallow correction or develops the larger ABC wave-② structure shown on the chart. This is my personal technical interpretation and not financial advice.Since I invested and follow this, I provided some info to AI. Asked it to include the latest events and the Last year/day chart. It shows momentum is negative. Also a comment with a picture from guynextdoor7. Here is the answer: I actually strongly agree with your main point: right now, I think it's a bit early to draw the big conclusion. The technical picture has clearly weakened, but we have also had an extreme amount of company-specific noise in a very short time. And when I look at both your charts and the analysis from the forum, I would distinguish quite clearly between what is useful technical information and what becomes a bit too much Elliott fantasy. 😅 First: the price has actually done exactly what we expected After the share issue at 4.80, the share has now moved down towards the 4.60–4.75 area. The last trading days show, among other things, 4.60 → 4.74 → 4.73, with quite significant volume. This tells me first and foremost that the market is still digesting the share issue. 4.80 is now a very clear reference point, but that doesn't mean it will automatically hold. At the same time, I think it's too early to say that the long-term trend is broken. ⸻ The technical picture right now Here, I think the forum analysis hits quite well on the short horizon: * daily momentum is bearish * MACD has turned down * the share is below the shorter moving averages * RSI has cooled down significantly from the top * it has fallen from 7.03 to around 4.6–4.7 So yes: momentum has left TRMED in the short term. But that doesn't necessarily mean we have started an enormous ABC correction. Those are two completely different statements. The level I'm watching most closely I actually like the forum's 3.98–4.05 as an important level. Not because Elliott Wave tells us the share should go there, but because it's an area where the price structure has previously worked. I would think roughly like this: 4.60–4.70: Current area. Buyers need to start showing up here. 4.80: The issue price. Very interesting reference, but not necessarily support. 5.00–5.15: First sign that the share is starting to regain strength. 5.35–5.40: More interesting technical confirmation. 3.98–4.05: The really important area. A clear break below this would significantly change my technical picture. And here I agree more with the forum analysis than I usually do with Elliott Wave: I would much rather see what the market actually does around 4 kroner than start projecting 2.83 → 2.12 → 1.60. 😅 ⸻ I would take the Elliott analysis with a big pinch of salt 🧂 There's one thing in the analysis that I think is a bit too bombastic: "Wave C towards 1.85–2.12" and further possibility of 1.598. It can be drawn on the chart, yes. But that's not the same as the market having given us proof that it will happen. Elliott Wave is very useful as a scenario tool, in my opinion. But when one starts using many historical Fibonacci levels and a 2023 bottom at 0.639 to create price targets many years into the future, the uncertainty becomes enormous. I would therefore treat: 1.60 / 2.0 / 2.8 as hypothetical scenarios – not price targets. ⸻ And then comes the most important thing: THE FUNDAMENTALS have changed This is why I think it's too early to conclude. Since the end of August, we have received: AlphaOne in commercial production → first customer delivery → H1 → 300 mill. share issue → USA initiative → new share capital → Scatec settlement. That's quite a lot in three weeks. 😅 And the share issue at 4.80 was actually oversubscribed several times, while 300 mill. is intended to finance, among other things, US establishment, downstream Pb-212 production, commercial infrastructure, and raw material access. So I think it's wrong to look at the chart as if this is still the same company/case as before the 7-kroner rally. There has been a fundamental capitalization of the company. ⸻ What I would do now And here, I actually think what you said yourself is the best analysis: "Things need to calm down before one can see which way forward." Yep. 100 %. 🤠 I wouldn't try to guess if the next big move comes from 4.60, 4.05, or 3.50. I would wait for the chart to give us information. Scenario A – bullish 4.60–4.70 holds → 4.80 is regained → 5.00 is broken → higher volume. Then I start to believe that the market has absorbed the share issue. Scenario B – sideways 4.50–5.00 for a few weeks. This is actually my favorite scenario right now. It would be healthy. The market gets to digest the share issue, new shares get established owners, and the company can start delivering on what was actually financed. Scenario C – bearish 4.60 breaks → 4.40/4.20 breaks → 3.98–4.05 is broken on a weekly basis. Then the forum analysis's more bearish scenario becomes much more relevant. But we are not there yet. ⸻ And one more thing that I think is important for us: I found no newer Thor announcement after September 11 confirming that the repair issue has actually been completed. Thor has so far announced the intention for up to 9.4 million shares at 4.80, and it is, among other things, contingent on market price and necessary corporate decisions. So right here, I wouldn't do anything until we have the final announcement.
- ·16 t sittenThor Medical is gearing up for growth AlphaOne is in commercial operation, and the company will now scale production and operations. The hunt for a commercial CFO with capital market experience shows clear ambitions – with both growth and profitability in focus. No confirmation on AlphaTwo or a new share issue, but the next proof must be increased deliveries, revenues, and better cash flow. Source: Økonomi24, September 15, 2026.
- ·21 t sittenI thought about it when I looked at the chart and realized why 4.6 might be hit. 4.6 was hit a few days ago too, before it reacted upwards shortly after (yes, it went a little below). The peak at ~7.1 kroner looks like the left shoulder in an inverse head-and-shoulders formation. 4.6-4.8-4.6 again becomes the "head" and if it maintains itself the way I see it, then it could become a reality that it will go up towards 7kr to complete this. In addition, volume is mainly lower around bottoms and high around tops (excluding the emission shares at 4.8). This is a somewhat speculative theory, like everything else here in the stock market. It might still be worth thinking about, since investor psychology likes patterns.
- ·23 t sittenNice to pick up some shares at these levels.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 1 023 | - | - | ||
| 12 083 | - | - | ||
| 3 504 | - | - | ||
| 4 513 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H2 - tulosraportti 26.2.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H1 - tulosraportti 28.8. | ||
2025 H2 - tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 H1 - tulosraportti 29.8.2025 | ||
2024 H2 - tulosraportti 26.2.2025 | ||
2024 H1 - tulosraportti 30.8.2024 |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 H1 - tulosraportti
22 päivää sitten
‧45 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 H2 - tulosraportti 26.2.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 H1 - tulosraportti 28.8. | ||
2025 H2 - tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 H1 - tulosraportti 29.8.2025 | ||
2024 H2 - tulosraportti 26.2.2025 | ||
2024 H1 - tulosraportti 30.8.2024 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·14 t sitten · Muokattuguynextdoor7 I honestly think that analysis is far too contrived. You start with a bearish Elliott Wave scenario and then build a lot of levels on top, which in practice can be drawn in several different ways. When you simultaneously don't own the stock and clearly want to buy lower, it's hard not to get the impression that the analysis also very conveniently fits your own desire for a lower price. Pointing to 2.80, 2.00 and all the way down towards 1.60 solely based on wave theory seems very speculative in a small, news-driven stock like Thor. A strong announcement about sales, deliveries or production can change the whole picture in one day. So I simply don't buy the premise that the stock "must" go significantly lower before it can rise again. It's one possible technical narrative — not a definitive answer.Of course it's fabricated when it's not positive😂 As said before, you just have to enjoy the (down)ride.
- 15 t sittenThor Medical ASA (TRMED) – Elliott Wave and Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis Thor Medical may have completed a major first wave at NOK 7.03, but the technical picture now points toward a corrective phase before the next sustainable advance. Because the listed company was previously Nordic Nanovector, I consider the NOK 0.639 low from 2023 the most relevant starting point for the present Thor Medical structure. Elliott Wave structure The advance from NOK 0.639 to NOK 7.03 can be counted as five waves. However, wave (4) overlaps wave (1), meaning it cannot be classified as a conventional impulse. The more appropriate interpretation is a possible leading diagonal forming major wave ①. The reversal from NOK 7.03 may therefore represent the beginning of major wave ②. Leading diagonals are frequently followed by relatively deep second-wave corrections. Market structure The daily and weekly charts currently show an important timeframe transition: * Daily swing trend: bearish * Daily internal trend: bearish * Last daily event: bearish Swing CHoCH * Weekly swing and internal trends: still bullish * Last weekly event: bullish BOS * Both timeframes registered a buy-side liquidity sweep before the reversal The daily structure has therefore confirmed a bearish shift, while the weekly structure has not yet officially turned bearish. The decisive weekly level is approximately NOK 3.98–4.05. A confirmed weekly close below this area would produce stronger evidence that major wave ② is underway. Anchored Volume Profile The profile is anchored from the 2023 low to the NOK 7.03 high and uses the current Thor Medical price structure: * VAH: approximately NOK 5.7–5.9 * POC: approximately NOK 4.55–4.65 * Secondary HVN: approximately NOK 2.6–2.83 * VAL: approximately NOK 1.85–1.95 The current price of NOK 4.605 is positioned almost exactly at the POC. This means the market is presently near its main accepted price and has not yet selected a clear longer-term direction. Acceptance below the POC, followed by a weekly break below NOK 3.98, would favour rotation toward the secondary HVN around NOK 2.6–2.83. Liquidity and volumetric order blocks The nearest important demand area is around NOK 3.70–4.05, where weekly liquidity, a Buy OB and the NOK 3.99 Fibonacci level converge. A deeper and potentially more important demand area is around NOK 1.47–1.70. This zone combines: * Weekly liquidity * Previous wave-(4) territory * The logarithmic 0.618 retracement at NOK 1.598 The first significant overhead Sell OB is around NOK 10–12. Additional supply is visible around NOK 18–22 and at higher historical levels. WaveTrend Momentum supports an early corrective phase: * Daily WaveTrend is bearish and below zero, although not deeply oversold. * Weekly WaveTrend is bearish, with the fast line below the signal line and a negative histogram. * Monthly WaveTrend remains marginally positive but has flattened near the upper region following a SELL warning. This suggests that the correction is confirmed on the lower timeframe, developing on the weekly timeframe and not yet fully confirmed on the monthly chart. Preferred corrective scenario My current preferred path is: 1. Weekly acceptance below NOK 3.98–4.05 2. Wave A toward NOK 2.45–2.83 3. Wave B rebound toward NOK 4.0–4.65, potentially NOK 5.36 4. Bearish continuation below the wave-A low 5. Wave C toward NOK 1.85–2.12 6. Possible final liquidity sweep toward NOK 1.598 NOK 1.598 should be viewed as a deeper sweep target rather than a guaranteed destination. For a confirmed wave-② bottom, I would want to see a liquidity sweep followed by a reclaim, bullish CHoCH and BOS, a confirmed Buy OB with volume expansion and bullish WaveTrend divergence. Bullish alternative If NOK 3.98–4.05 holds and price subsequently reclaims: * NOK 5.36 * VAH around NOK 5.7–5.9 * NOK 7.03 then the correction may remain considerably shallower. A sustained breakout above NOK 7.03 would require the Elliott count to be advanced or revised. Long-term outlook After a confirmed wave-② completion and a new breakout above NOK 7.03, the more defensible wave-③ objectives would initially be: * NOK 11–14 * Extended target around NOK 18–21 The much higher logarithmic projections around NOK 80 and NOK 200 remain highly speculative and should not be treated as active targets before the lower Sell OBs and resistance zones have been decisively absorbed. Conclusion The long-term potential remains bullish, but the shorter-term evidence currently favours correction: Daily structure is bearish, weekly momentum is bearish, but weekly price structure remains technically bullish until NOK 3.98–4.05 is broken. The market’s reaction around NOK 4.00 will likely determine whether Thor Medical forms a shallow correction or develops the larger ABC wave-② structure shown on the chart. This is my personal technical interpretation and not financial advice.Since I invested and follow this, I provided some info to AI. Asked it to include the latest events and the Last year/day chart. It shows momentum is negative. Also a comment with a picture from guynextdoor7. Here is the answer: I actually strongly agree with your main point: right now, I think it's a bit early to draw the big conclusion. The technical picture has clearly weakened, but we have also had an extreme amount of company-specific noise in a very short time. And when I look at both your charts and the analysis from the forum, I would distinguish quite clearly between what is useful technical information and what becomes a bit too much Elliott fantasy. 😅 First: the price has actually done exactly what we expected After the share issue at 4.80, the share has now moved down towards the 4.60–4.75 area. The last trading days show, among other things, 4.60 → 4.74 → 4.73, with quite significant volume. This tells me first and foremost that the market is still digesting the share issue. 4.80 is now a very clear reference point, but that doesn't mean it will automatically hold. At the same time, I think it's too early to say that the long-term trend is broken. ⸻ The technical picture right now Here, I think the forum analysis hits quite well on the short horizon: * daily momentum is bearish * MACD has turned down * the share is below the shorter moving averages * RSI has cooled down significantly from the top * it has fallen from 7.03 to around 4.6–4.7 So yes: momentum has left TRMED in the short term. But that doesn't necessarily mean we have started an enormous ABC correction. Those are two completely different statements. The level I'm watching most closely I actually like the forum's 3.98–4.05 as an important level. Not because Elliott Wave tells us the share should go there, but because it's an area where the price structure has previously worked. I would think roughly like this: 4.60–4.70: Current area. Buyers need to start showing up here. 4.80: The issue price. Very interesting reference, but not necessarily support. 5.00–5.15: First sign that the share is starting to regain strength. 5.35–5.40: More interesting technical confirmation. 3.98–4.05: The really important area. A clear break below this would significantly change my technical picture. And here I agree more with the forum analysis than I usually do with Elliott Wave: I would much rather see what the market actually does around 4 kroner than start projecting 2.83 → 2.12 → 1.60. 😅 ⸻ I would take the Elliott analysis with a big pinch of salt 🧂 There's one thing in the analysis that I think is a bit too bombastic: "Wave C towards 1.85–2.12" and further possibility of 1.598. It can be drawn on the chart, yes. But that's not the same as the market having given us proof that it will happen. Elliott Wave is very useful as a scenario tool, in my opinion. But when one starts using many historical Fibonacci levels and a 2023 bottom at 0.639 to create price targets many years into the future, the uncertainty becomes enormous. I would therefore treat: 1.60 / 2.0 / 2.8 as hypothetical scenarios – not price targets. ⸻ And then comes the most important thing: THE FUNDAMENTALS have changed This is why I think it's too early to conclude. Since the end of August, we have received: AlphaOne in commercial production → first customer delivery → H1 → 300 mill. share issue → USA initiative → new share capital → Scatec settlement. That's quite a lot in three weeks. 😅 And the share issue at 4.80 was actually oversubscribed several times, while 300 mill. is intended to finance, among other things, US establishment, downstream Pb-212 production, commercial infrastructure, and raw material access. So I think it's wrong to look at the chart as if this is still the same company/case as before the 7-kroner rally. There has been a fundamental capitalization of the company. ⸻ What I would do now And here, I actually think what you said yourself is the best analysis: "Things need to calm down before one can see which way forward." Yep. 100 %. 🤠 I wouldn't try to guess if the next big move comes from 4.60, 4.05, or 3.50. I would wait for the chart to give us information. Scenario A – bullish 4.60–4.70 holds → 4.80 is regained → 5.00 is broken → higher volume. Then I start to believe that the market has absorbed the share issue. Scenario B – sideways 4.50–5.00 for a few weeks. This is actually my favorite scenario right now. It would be healthy. The market gets to digest the share issue, new shares get established owners, and the company can start delivering on what was actually financed. Scenario C – bearish 4.60 breaks → 4.40/4.20 breaks → 3.98–4.05 is broken on a weekly basis. Then the forum analysis's more bearish scenario becomes much more relevant. But we are not there yet. ⸻ And one more thing that I think is important for us: I found no newer Thor announcement after September 11 confirming that the repair issue has actually been completed. Thor has so far announced the intention for up to 9.4 million shares at 4.80, and it is, among other things, contingent on market price and necessary corporate decisions. So right here, I wouldn't do anything until we have the final announcement.
- ·16 t sittenThor Medical is gearing up for growth AlphaOne is in commercial operation, and the company will now scale production and operations. The hunt for a commercial CFO with capital market experience shows clear ambitions – with both growth and profitability in focus. No confirmation on AlphaTwo or a new share issue, but the next proof must be increased deliveries, revenues, and better cash flow. Source: Økonomi24, September 15, 2026.
- ·21 t sittenI thought about it when I looked at the chart and realized why 4.6 might be hit. 4.6 was hit a few days ago too, before it reacted upwards shortly after (yes, it went a little below). The peak at ~7.1 kroner looks like the left shoulder in an inverse head-and-shoulders formation. 4.6-4.8-4.6 again becomes the "head" and if it maintains itself the way I see it, then it could become a reality that it will go up towards 7kr to complete this. In addition, volume is mainly lower around bottoms and high around tops (excluding the emission shares at 4.8). This is a somewhat speculative theory, like everything else here in the stock market. It might still be worth thinking about, since investor psychology likes patterns.
- ·23 t sittenNice to pick up some shares at these levels.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 1 023 | - | - | ||
| 12 083 | - | - | ||
| 3 504 | - | - | ||
| 4 513 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt