Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.

Jinhui Shipping and Transportation

Jinhui Shipping and Transportation

5,90NOK
+2,08% (+0,12)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin6,00
Alin5,78
Vaihto
0,2 MNOK
5,90NOK
+2,08% (+0,12)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin6,00
Alin5,78
Vaihto
0,2 MNOK

Jinhui Shipping and Transportation

Jinhui Shipping and Transportation

5,90NOK
+2,08% (+0,12)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin6,00
Alin5,78
Vaihto
0,2 MNOK
5,90NOK
+2,08% (+0,12)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin6,00
Alin5,78
Vaihto
0,2 MNOK

Jinhui Shipping and Transportation

Jinhui Shipping and Transportation

5,90NOK
+2,08% (+0,12)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin6,00
Alin5,78
Vaihto
0,2 MNOK
5,90NOK
+2,08% (+0,12)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin6,00
Alin5,78
Vaihto
0,2 MNOK
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
16 päivää sitten
0,3065 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
5,30 %Tuotto/v

Tarjoustasot

NorwayOslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
10 000
Myynti
Määrä
5 000

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
1--
21--
89--
1--
14--
Ylin
6
VWAP
-
Alin
5,78
VaihtoMäärä
0,2 31 225
VWAP
-
Ylin
6
Alin
5,78
VaihtoMäärä
0,2 31 225

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
27.2.2026
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti27.11.
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti26.8.
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti26.5.
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti27.2.
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti25.11.2024
Datan lähde: FactSet

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    That the share price here measured against earnings and steel values should be >NOK 10 and not 6 is quite obvious compared to peers. It's not the definitive answer, just my opinion. 🧐 Revenue seems to be picking up, so there might be something to it.
    13 t sitten
    ·
    13 t sitten
    ·
    I would not call a turnover of 31K shares and 200K in turnover as picking up 😉
  • 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    This is not the definitive answer, but my opinion: A shipping company that over time is priced far, far below the value of its assets is by definition mismanaged. So the question is what can be done. Is there any realistic possibility of bringing about changes in JIN? Or are we stuck with two options - take it (today's management) or leave it (sell the shares)? For various reasons, I believe that it should be possible to obtain proxies for over 2 million shares. That, of course, depends on the interest from minority shareholders. Is this enough?
    17 t sitten
    ·
    17 t sitten
    ·
    And you repeat the same whining 100000 times. JIN is in many ways the easiest stock to deal with. You don't need to know anything about ships, about chartering, about rates, bunkers, or what Suez means or doesn't mean. Regarding JIN, you actually only need to deal with one thing, namely that the family decides everything! And even if all other shareholders wail and whine like you, they still decide. You only need to deal with ONE THING, and you can't figure that out. So whine away. You might as well stand next to the Nile and believe your whining can make it flow the other way.
    17 t sitten
    ·
    17 t sitten
    ·
    As I said - you are just a nuisance now. I posted a thread to discuss a specific matter. You have stated your opinion. Perhaps someone wants to discuss the matter I am raising.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    It will be interesting to see what Jinhui with its 3 Capesize (two chartered) gets out of the very high Capesize rates in today's market. The index is falling now, but has been over 5000 points for a short while and over 4000 points for a longer while. Potentially JIN may have secured strong rates for the three ships.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    A fleet replacement is a natural part of industrial shipping. Fewer tons/mile must be seen in conjunction with the fact that old ships will be penalized both in earnings and with costly maintenance to be kept in class. Net earnings for the shipping company will therefore be maintained over time with a lower average age, even if the number of owned ships may be reduced for a period, even in «Asia trade». That the shipping company chooses a cautious «gearing» with a low debt ratio in a volatile freight market further strengthens the long-term perspective and lays the foundation for stable returns to shareholders. If you as a shareholder are looking for short-term «super-returns» and sharply rising share prices in line with short-term increases in freight rates, then this is not the stock for you. Even the «Norwegian» companies have large bonus payments to management that dilute shareholders every time earnings rise sharply, either in the form of stock options or remuneration, so there is no difference.
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    I venture the assertion that most people who invest in Jinhui know that the management will not do share buybacks to raise the stock price. You were obviously one of the exceptions and feel cheated/betrayed. But the reason is that you obviously hadn't done your homework before you bought in. Then all the repetitions about how strange Jinhui shareholders are become a bit odd, to put it mildly.
    17 t sitten
    ·
    17 t sitten
    ·
    Again these comments that IT IS ME who is the problem here, not a management that destroys shareholder value.
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    What do you think? Are they buying one ship at the price of 3 of the ships they sold?
    9 t sitten
    ·
    9 t sitten
    ·
    You are wrong. They control directly and indirectly over 64%
    8 t sitten
    ·
    8 t sitten
    ·
    now - approx 65 pct. they control as mirhra writes
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset ja analyysit

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
16 päivää sitten
0,3065 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
5,30 %Tuotto/v

Uutiset ja analyysit

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    That the share price here measured against earnings and steel values should be >NOK 10 and not 6 is quite obvious compared to peers. It's not the definitive answer, just my opinion. 🧐 Revenue seems to be picking up, so there might be something to it.
    13 t sitten
    ·
    13 t sitten
    ·
    I would not call a turnover of 31K shares and 200K in turnover as picking up 😉
  • 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    This is not the definitive answer, but my opinion: A shipping company that over time is priced far, far below the value of its assets is by definition mismanaged. So the question is what can be done. Is there any realistic possibility of bringing about changes in JIN? Or are we stuck with two options - take it (today's management) or leave it (sell the shares)? For various reasons, I believe that it should be possible to obtain proxies for over 2 million shares. That, of course, depends on the interest from minority shareholders. Is this enough?
    17 t sitten
    ·
    17 t sitten
    ·
    And you repeat the same whining 100000 times. JIN is in many ways the easiest stock to deal with. You don't need to know anything about ships, about chartering, about rates, bunkers, or what Suez means or doesn't mean. Regarding JIN, you actually only need to deal with one thing, namely that the family decides everything! And even if all other shareholders wail and whine like you, they still decide. You only need to deal with ONE THING, and you can't figure that out. So whine away. You might as well stand next to the Nile and believe your whining can make it flow the other way.
    17 t sitten
    ·
    17 t sitten
    ·
    As I said - you are just a nuisance now. I posted a thread to discuss a specific matter. You have stated your opinion. Perhaps someone wants to discuss the matter I am raising.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    It will be interesting to see what Jinhui with its 3 Capesize (two chartered) gets out of the very high Capesize rates in today's market. The index is falling now, but has been over 5000 points for a short while and over 4000 points for a longer while. Potentially JIN may have secured strong rates for the three ships.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    A fleet replacement is a natural part of industrial shipping. Fewer tons/mile must be seen in conjunction with the fact that old ships will be penalized both in earnings and with costly maintenance to be kept in class. Net earnings for the shipping company will therefore be maintained over time with a lower average age, even if the number of owned ships may be reduced for a period, even in «Asia trade». That the shipping company chooses a cautious «gearing» with a low debt ratio in a volatile freight market further strengthens the long-term perspective and lays the foundation for stable returns to shareholders. If you as a shareholder are looking for short-term «super-returns» and sharply rising share prices in line with short-term increases in freight rates, then this is not the stock for you. Even the «Norwegian» companies have large bonus payments to management that dilute shareholders every time earnings rise sharply, either in the form of stock options or remuneration, so there is no difference.
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    I venture the assertion that most people who invest in Jinhui know that the management will not do share buybacks to raise the stock price. You were obviously one of the exceptions and feel cheated/betrayed. But the reason is that you obviously hadn't done your homework before you bought in. Then all the repetitions about how strange Jinhui shareholders are become a bit odd, to put it mildly.
    17 t sitten
    ·
    17 t sitten
    ·
    Again these comments that IT IS ME who is the problem here, not a management that destroys shareholder value.
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    What do you think? Are they buying one ship at the price of 3 of the ships they sold?
    9 t sitten
    ·
    9 t sitten
    ·
    You are wrong. They control directly and indirectly over 64%
    8 t sitten
    ·
    8 t sitten
    ·
    now - approx 65 pct. they control as mirhra writes
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

NorwayOslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
10 000
Myynti
Määrä
5 000

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
1--
21--
89--
1--
14--
Ylin
6
VWAP
-
Alin
5,78
VaihtoMäärä
0,2 31 225
VWAP
-
Ylin
6
Alin
5,78
VaihtoMäärä
0,2 31 225

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
27.2.2026
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti27.11.
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti26.8.
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti26.5.
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti27.2.
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti25.11.2024
Datan lähde: FactSet

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
16 päivää sitten

Uutiset ja analyysit

Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
27.2.2026
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti27.11.
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti26.8.
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti26.5.
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti27.2.
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti25.11.2024
Datan lähde: FactSet

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

0,3065 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
5,30 %Tuotto/v

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    16 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    That the share price here measured against earnings and steel values should be >NOK 10 and not 6 is quite obvious compared to peers. It's not the definitive answer, just my opinion. 🧐 Revenue seems to be picking up, so there might be something to it.
    13 t sitten
    ·
    13 t sitten
    ·
    I would not call a turnover of 31K shares and 200K in turnover as picking up 😉
  • 1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    This is not the definitive answer, but my opinion: A shipping company that over time is priced far, far below the value of its assets is by definition mismanaged. So the question is what can be done. Is there any realistic possibility of bringing about changes in JIN? Or are we stuck with two options - take it (today's management) or leave it (sell the shares)? For various reasons, I believe that it should be possible to obtain proxies for over 2 million shares. That, of course, depends on the interest from minority shareholders. Is this enough?
    17 t sitten
    ·
    17 t sitten
    ·
    And you repeat the same whining 100000 times. JIN is in many ways the easiest stock to deal with. You don't need to know anything about ships, about chartering, about rates, bunkers, or what Suez means or doesn't mean. Regarding JIN, you actually only need to deal with one thing, namely that the family decides everything! And even if all other shareholders wail and whine like you, they still decide. You only need to deal with ONE THING, and you can't figure that out. So whine away. You might as well stand next to the Nile and believe your whining can make it flow the other way.
    17 t sitten
    ·
    17 t sitten
    ·
    As I said - you are just a nuisance now. I posted a thread to discuss a specific matter. You have stated your opinion. Perhaps someone wants to discuss the matter I am raising.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    It will be interesting to see what Jinhui with its 3 Capesize (two chartered) gets out of the very high Capesize rates in today's market. The index is falling now, but has been over 5000 points for a short while and over 4000 points for a longer while. Potentially JIN may have secured strong rates for the three ships.
  • 2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    A fleet replacement is a natural part of industrial shipping. Fewer tons/mile must be seen in conjunction with the fact that old ships will be penalized both in earnings and with costly maintenance to be kept in class. Net earnings for the shipping company will therefore be maintained over time with a lower average age, even if the number of owned ships may be reduced for a period, even in «Asia trade». That the shipping company chooses a cautious «gearing» with a low debt ratio in a volatile freight market further strengthens the long-term perspective and lays the foundation for stable returns to shareholders. If you as a shareholder are looking for short-term «super-returns» and sharply rising share prices in line with short-term increases in freight rates, then this is not the stock for you. Even the «Norwegian» companies have large bonus payments to management that dilute shareholders every time earnings rise sharply, either in the form of stock options or remuneration, so there is no difference.
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    2 päivää sitten
    ·
    I venture the assertion that most people who invest in Jinhui know that the management will not do share buybacks to raise the stock price. You were obviously one of the exceptions and feel cheated/betrayed. But the reason is that you obviously hadn't done your homework before you bought in. Then all the repetitions about how strange Jinhui shareholders are become a bit odd, to put it mildly.
    17 t sitten
    ·
    17 t sitten
    ·
    Again these comments that IT IS ME who is the problem here, not a management that destroys shareholder value.
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    What do you think? Are they buying one ship at the price of 3 of the ships they sold?
    9 t sitten
    ·
    9 t sitten
    ·
    You are wrong. They control directly and indirectly over 64%
    8 t sitten
    ·
    8 t sitten
    ·
    now - approx 65 pct. they control as mirhra writes
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

NorwayOslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
10 000
Myynti
Määrä
5 000

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
1--
21--
89--
1--
14--
Ylin
6
VWAP
-
Alin
5,78
VaihtoMäärä
0,2 31 225
VWAP
-
Ylin
6
Alin
5,78
VaihtoMäärä
0,2 31 225

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt