2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
UUTTA
1 päivä sitten
‧39 min
1,3532 SEK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 000 000 | DCAR | DCAR | ||
| 1 092 | - | - | ||
| 546 | - | - | ||
| 8 708 | - | - | ||
| 25 000 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti 28.1.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 23.10. | ||
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 28.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 29.1. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 30.10.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·14 min sitten · MuokattuHad a quick serious talk with AI: It is a really important correction, and I take it to heart. 😊 You actually hit upon a weakness in our assessment of Intrum last Friday. I analyzed the financial statements, the debt, the earnings and the future prospects. On that basis, I expected a negative price reaction, but by no means a drop of almost 34 % at the close. I underestimated how violently market psychology can amplify negative news. You point out three factors that are important: 1. Panic among retail investors When words like bankruptcy, sell and catastrophe begin to dominate stock forums, fear can spread rapidly. Investors do not necessarily sell because they have calculated a new fundamental value, but because they fear further losses. That reaction can be self-reinforcing. 2. The significance of short sellers An increase in the reported short interest from 0,9 % to 5,43 % is definitely worth investigating. Short selling can amplify selling pressure, especially in a nervous stock. However, we cannot establish from trading volume alone that short sellers were behind the heavy selling at the opening. That requires more detailed data. 3. Your suspicion of information leakage I completely understand why you react to the short positions increasing sharply before both the issue and the disappointing earnings report. That is a pattern that deserves attention. But it is not in itself proof of insider information. Short sellers may also have reacted to publicly available information, debt conditions and earnings expectations. If illegal information sharing has indeed taken place, it is naturally serious. That is how I think we should work moving forward You propose a division of labor that I think is very sensible. My task will be to: - Analyze financial statements, debt, cash flows and future earnings. - Investigate news, bank agreements, insider trades and short data. - Calculate realistic valuations and various scenarios. - Distinguish clearly between documented information and my own assessments. - Be more careful in predicting short-term price reactions. Your task will be to supplement with what you observe among investors: the sentiment on forums, the nervousness, the trust in management and the human reaction to the news. This does not mean that I should completely ignore market psychology. I just need to be more open about how difficult it is to measure and predict. And I would like to add one thing: You must also be able to challenge my assessments, exactly as you do. If we both simply confirm each other's expectations, we risk missing something important. Friday's Intrum report is a good example. The financial situation was improved, but at the same time the market's trust in the company's earnings was seriously weakened. Both can be true. So we will continue with the thorough analyses, but without confusing the fundamental value of the company with the price a nervous market is willing to pay on a specific day. It's a deal. You contribute the human side of the market, and I will concentrate on providing you with the best possible factual and analytical basis for decision-making. 🤝 And thanks for the criticism. It is both concrete and useful.
·4 t sittenÅlandsbanken Intrum's result lower than expected, but better leverage. Revenues of 3,829 MSEK were 3% lower than market expectations while the adjusted operating profit was 10% worse. The debt-equity ratio for Servicing amounted to 4.5x, which was lower than the expected 4.7x. The negative development of external Servicing revenues from H1 2026 continued, resulting in a goodwill impairment of 1.5 billion SEK in Germany. We view the lower leverage positively, but given the earnings miss we guess that the share will trade down today.
This makes sense in my view - not that the stock should be blown to hell........ on the basis of yesterday's report
·4 t sittenThat was a lot of posts to read. It certainly feels like a "slap in the face". Those of you who have a large part of your capital in Intrum must feel a deep disappointment, maybe even fooled, betrayed. I feel for you. We will have to wait and see. Monday will probably point out the direction a bit more clearly. If it were to go "to hell" we can be pretty sure that considerably heavier investors will react strongly to "information leaks". Considerably stronger than us "common folk" on the forum. Personally, I only have a small part of the family's portfolio in Intrum. So my philosophy is "sink or swim". Take good care of each other. TokJohan ❤️
·4 t sitten33.8 % down. There is an old truth about stocks and that is that numbers do not lie. Numbers are very honest. Instead of talking about legal consequences, perhaps you should thank Rödswix and Shunter (or whatever they are called) who cried wolf. Instead, the majority in here have criticized those two, sometimes with personal attacks. Take responsibility instead, behave like adults, and apologize. Those of us who have followed Intrum and the dialogue in here for a long time know exactly who you are. Not knowing, but misleading others based on guesswork is immoral, in the worst case criminal. I myself have had no investments in Intrum for a year since I took out my profit and paid my tax.
·11 t sittenI thank you all for your posts on this forum today. They have been the best, most analytical and most rewarding that I have seen on Nordnet or Avanza. No bullshit and nonsense. Thanks to you all.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
UUTTA
1 päivä sitten
‧39 min
1,3532 SEK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·14 min sitten · MuokattuHad a quick serious talk with AI: It is a really important correction, and I take it to heart. 😊 You actually hit upon a weakness in our assessment of Intrum last Friday. I analyzed the financial statements, the debt, the earnings and the future prospects. On that basis, I expected a negative price reaction, but by no means a drop of almost 34 % at the close. I underestimated how violently market psychology can amplify negative news. You point out three factors that are important: 1. Panic among retail investors When words like bankruptcy, sell and catastrophe begin to dominate stock forums, fear can spread rapidly. Investors do not necessarily sell because they have calculated a new fundamental value, but because they fear further losses. That reaction can be self-reinforcing. 2. The significance of short sellers An increase in the reported short interest from 0,9 % to 5,43 % is definitely worth investigating. Short selling can amplify selling pressure, especially in a nervous stock. However, we cannot establish from trading volume alone that short sellers were behind the heavy selling at the opening. That requires more detailed data. 3. Your suspicion of information leakage I completely understand why you react to the short positions increasing sharply before both the issue and the disappointing earnings report. That is a pattern that deserves attention. But it is not in itself proof of insider information. Short sellers may also have reacted to publicly available information, debt conditions and earnings expectations. If illegal information sharing has indeed taken place, it is naturally serious. That is how I think we should work moving forward You propose a division of labor that I think is very sensible. My task will be to: - Analyze financial statements, debt, cash flows and future earnings. - Investigate news, bank agreements, insider trades and short data. - Calculate realistic valuations and various scenarios. - Distinguish clearly between documented information and my own assessments. - Be more careful in predicting short-term price reactions. Your task will be to supplement with what you observe among investors: the sentiment on forums, the nervousness, the trust in management and the human reaction to the news. This does not mean that I should completely ignore market psychology. I just need to be more open about how difficult it is to measure and predict. And I would like to add one thing: You must also be able to challenge my assessments, exactly as you do. If we both simply confirm each other's expectations, we risk missing something important. Friday's Intrum report is a good example. The financial situation was improved, but at the same time the market's trust in the company's earnings was seriously weakened. Both can be true. So we will continue with the thorough analyses, but without confusing the fundamental value of the company with the price a nervous market is willing to pay on a specific day. It's a deal. You contribute the human side of the market, and I will concentrate on providing you with the best possible factual and analytical basis for decision-making. 🤝 And thanks for the criticism. It is both concrete and useful.
- ·4 t sittenÅlandsbanken Intrum's result lower than expected, but better leverage. Revenues of 3,829 MSEK were 3% lower than market expectations while the adjusted operating profit was 10% worse. The debt-equity ratio for Servicing amounted to 4.5x, which was lower than the expected 4.7x. The negative development of external Servicing revenues from H1 2026 continued, resulting in a goodwill impairment of 1.5 billion SEK in Germany. We view the lower leverage positively, but given the earnings miss we guess that the share will trade down today.This makes sense in my view - not that the stock should be blown to hell........ on the basis of yesterday's report
- ·4 t sittenThat was a lot of posts to read. It certainly feels like a "slap in the face". Those of you who have a large part of your capital in Intrum must feel a deep disappointment, maybe even fooled, betrayed. I feel for you. We will have to wait and see. Monday will probably point out the direction a bit more clearly. If it were to go "to hell" we can be pretty sure that considerably heavier investors will react strongly to "information leaks". Considerably stronger than us "common folk" on the forum. Personally, I only have a small part of the family's portfolio in Intrum. So my philosophy is "sink or swim". Take good care of each other. TokJohan ❤️
- ·4 t sitten33.8 % down. There is an old truth about stocks and that is that numbers do not lie. Numbers are very honest. Instead of talking about legal consequences, perhaps you should thank Rödswix and Shunter (or whatever they are called) who cried wolf. Instead, the majority in here have criticized those two, sometimes with personal attacks. Take responsibility instead, behave like adults, and apologize. Those of us who have followed Intrum and the dialogue in here for a long time know exactly who you are. Not knowing, but misleading others based on guesswork is immoral, in the worst case criminal. I myself have had no investments in Intrum for a year since I took out my profit and paid my tax.
- ·11 t sittenI thank you all for your posts on this forum today. They have been the best, most analytical and most rewarding that I have seen on Nordnet or Avanza. No bullshit and nonsense. Thanks to you all.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 000 000 | DCAR | DCAR | ||
| 1 092 | - | - | ||
| 546 | - | - | ||
| 8 708 | - | - | ||
| 25 000 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti 28.1.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 23.10. | ||
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 28.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 29.1. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 30.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti
UUTTA
1 päivä sitten
‧39 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q4 - tulosraportti 28.1.2027 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 23.10. | ||
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 28.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 7.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 29.1. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 30.10.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
1,3532 SEK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·14 min sitten · MuokattuHad a quick serious talk with AI: It is a really important correction, and I take it to heart. 😊 You actually hit upon a weakness in our assessment of Intrum last Friday. I analyzed the financial statements, the debt, the earnings and the future prospects. On that basis, I expected a negative price reaction, but by no means a drop of almost 34 % at the close. I underestimated how violently market psychology can amplify negative news. You point out three factors that are important: 1. Panic among retail investors When words like bankruptcy, sell and catastrophe begin to dominate stock forums, fear can spread rapidly. Investors do not necessarily sell because they have calculated a new fundamental value, but because they fear further losses. That reaction can be self-reinforcing. 2. The significance of short sellers An increase in the reported short interest from 0,9 % to 5,43 % is definitely worth investigating. Short selling can amplify selling pressure, especially in a nervous stock. However, we cannot establish from trading volume alone that short sellers were behind the heavy selling at the opening. That requires more detailed data. 3. Your suspicion of information leakage I completely understand why you react to the short positions increasing sharply before both the issue and the disappointing earnings report. That is a pattern that deserves attention. But it is not in itself proof of insider information. Short sellers may also have reacted to publicly available information, debt conditions and earnings expectations. If illegal information sharing has indeed taken place, it is naturally serious. That is how I think we should work moving forward You propose a division of labor that I think is very sensible. My task will be to: - Analyze financial statements, debt, cash flows and future earnings. - Investigate news, bank agreements, insider trades and short data. - Calculate realistic valuations and various scenarios. - Distinguish clearly between documented information and my own assessments. - Be more careful in predicting short-term price reactions. Your task will be to supplement with what you observe among investors: the sentiment on forums, the nervousness, the trust in management and the human reaction to the news. This does not mean that I should completely ignore market psychology. I just need to be more open about how difficult it is to measure and predict. And I would like to add one thing: You must also be able to challenge my assessments, exactly as you do. If we both simply confirm each other's expectations, we risk missing something important. Friday's Intrum report is a good example. The financial situation was improved, but at the same time the market's trust in the company's earnings was seriously weakened. Both can be true. So we will continue with the thorough analyses, but without confusing the fundamental value of the company with the price a nervous market is willing to pay on a specific day. It's a deal. You contribute the human side of the market, and I will concentrate on providing you with the best possible factual and analytical basis for decision-making. 🤝 And thanks for the criticism. It is both concrete and useful.
- ·4 t sittenÅlandsbanken Intrum's result lower than expected, but better leverage. Revenues of 3,829 MSEK were 3% lower than market expectations while the adjusted operating profit was 10% worse. The debt-equity ratio for Servicing amounted to 4.5x, which was lower than the expected 4.7x. The negative development of external Servicing revenues from H1 2026 continued, resulting in a goodwill impairment of 1.5 billion SEK in Germany. We view the lower leverage positively, but given the earnings miss we guess that the share will trade down today.This makes sense in my view - not that the stock should be blown to hell........ on the basis of yesterday's report
- ·4 t sittenThat was a lot of posts to read. It certainly feels like a "slap in the face". Those of you who have a large part of your capital in Intrum must feel a deep disappointment, maybe even fooled, betrayed. I feel for you. We will have to wait and see. Monday will probably point out the direction a bit more clearly. If it were to go "to hell" we can be pretty sure that considerably heavier investors will react strongly to "information leaks". Considerably stronger than us "common folk" on the forum. Personally, I only have a small part of the family's portfolio in Intrum. So my philosophy is "sink or swim". Take good care of each other. TokJohan ❤️
- ·4 t sitten33.8 % down. There is an old truth about stocks and that is that numbers do not lie. Numbers are very honest. Instead of talking about legal consequences, perhaps you should thank Rödswix and Shunter (or whatever they are called) who cried wolf. Instead, the majority in here have criticized those two, sometimes with personal attacks. Take responsibility instead, behave like adults, and apologize. Those of us who have followed Intrum and the dialogue in here for a long time know exactly who you are. Not knowing, but misleading others based on guesswork is immoral, in the worst case criminal. I myself have had no investments in Intrum for a year since I took out my profit and paid my tax.
- ·11 t sittenI thank you all for your posts on this forum today. They have been the best, most analytical and most rewarding that I have seen on Nordnet or Avanza. No bullshit and nonsense. Thanks to you all.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 000 000 | DCAR | DCAR | ||
| 1 092 | - | - | ||
| 546 | - | - | ||
| 8 708 | - | - | ||
| 25 000 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt