Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.

A.P. Møller - Mærsk B

A.P. Møller - Mærsk B

14 410DKK
−3,06% (−455,00)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin14 575
Alin14 280
Vaihto
296,3 MDKK
14 410DKK
−3,06% (−455,00)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin14 575
Alin14 280
Vaihto
296,3 MDKK

A.P. Møller - Mærsk B

A.P. Møller - Mærsk B

14 410DKK
−3,06% (−455,00)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin14 575
Alin14 280
Vaihto
296,3 MDKK
14 410DKK
−3,06% (−455,00)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin14 575
Alin14 280
Vaihto
296,3 MDKK

A.P. Møller - Mærsk B

A.P. Møller - Mærsk B

14 410DKK
−3,06% (−455,00)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin14 575
Alin14 280
Vaihto
296,3 MDKK
14 410DKK
−3,06% (−455,00)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin14 575
Alin14 280
Vaihto
296,3 MDKK
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
80 päivää sitten1 t 1 min
1 120,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,53%Tuotto/v

Tarjoustasot

DenmarkNasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
7 356
Myynti
Määrä
7 376

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
415ENSENS
35--
1--
5--
6--
Ylin
14 575
VWAP
14 405
Alin
14 280
VaihtoMäärä
296,3 20 578
VWAP
14 405
Ylin
14 575
Alin
14 280
VaihtoMäärä
296,3 20 578

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet
Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
5.2.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti6.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti8.5.2025
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 202518.3.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti6.2.2025

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    What do you think: are we heading down now? Some banks/institutions have set low justified values for Maersk …
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    It doesn't really look like the shorts are exiting, it has been around 4.5% for a while now and is heading towards 5% again. The buyback program doesn't seem to scare them.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Welcome to a Good Friday for AP
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Are you short in it?
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    The collaboration between Mærsk and Hapag-Lloyd, known as Gemini Cooperation, appears to be a success based on preliminary results and ambitions for 2026. Reasons for the positive assessment: High punctuality: The alliance aims for a reliability of over 90 %. By the beginning of 2026, Gemini already has a reliability of around 89-91 % in the initial operational phases, which is significantly higher than the market average. Innovative network: The cooperation uses a "hub-and-spoke" model, where large vessels sail between central hubs, while smaller "shuttles" quickly distribute cargo to other ports. This reduces waiting times and increases flexibility. Operational savings: Already by the end of 2025, Hapag-Lloyd began to see the first operational savings as a result of the cooperation, and these are expected to become even more significant during 2026. Green transition: Both shipping companies are among the most ambitious regarding decarbonization. The cooperation allows them to optimize the fleet and better utilize fuel-efficient vessels. Challenges in 2026: External factors: Red Sea: Due to the security situation, the network continues to sail around Africa (Cape of Good Hope). Certain routes may begin to return to the Suez Canal in 2026, if security permits. Ramp-up phase: In the early phase, customers have experienced certain challenges with connections and space shortages, which the alliance is working to fully stabilize in 2026. Overall, the Gemini cooperation is considered one of the most promising shifts in the shipping industry in 2026, as it combines high service quality with lower operating costs. Mærsk yes sir. I'm damn well holding onto my 46stk
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    ...and for comparisons, there was 1120kr last year as well as buybacks for 14.4bn. So a slightly less good year than 24, but still fine. Add to that that APM has over 70% of the shares, so the stock is not super liquid. And in that context, it's worth noting. The company with a market value of 250bn, and outstanding share capital of 30% i.e., 75bn. dkk. This also means that APM actually only needs to put 50bn more into "itself", then they can own 90% of the share capital, and thus have the right to delist itself, and compulsorily buy back the rest of the company - this is naturally "rumors and conspiracy", but seen from APM's side, the annual profits might do better staying within the company, than pleasing a market that, as seen with APM glasses, constantly leans to the negative side. But in the short term, we might go down a bit more, and the financial report might again send the stock down (as it usually goes), but the underlying numbers tend to be good - for long-term shareholders. Enough about that - this is not a recommendation for anything, but merely a comment that we don't quite know which way the wind is blowing - when it comes to APM in the 3-4-5 year perspective...it will be exciting to see what happens. Ahoy!
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    The market as such is neither more negative nor more positive than it is justified. Being listed on the stock exchange can be cumbersome, and the Mærsk family has never liked to consider others. A delisting would mean they can score it all themselves, yes, but at the same time it also means that if there's turbulence, they will also have to take all the beatings themselves. And with madmen like Xi, Putin, and now with an even more unpredictable and mentally ill fascist leader also in the West, i.e. Trump, the world has clearly become even more uncertain and turbulent than almost ever before, so it's quite a chance to take to run it all themselves. If they move everything to usa, then it could be a fantastic idea.
  • 20.1.
    ·
    20.1.
    ·
    Possible reason for today's jump: Reuters Tue, 20 January 2026 at 10:01 am CET 2 min read PARIS, Jan 20 (Reuters) - Shipping group CMA CGM will re-reroute vessels on three of its services away from the Suez Canal ​due to global uncertainties, it said on Tuesday, reining in plans ‌to expand transits after two years of disruption linked to attacks on vessels. Shipping companies have ‌been weighing a return to the critical Asia-Europe trade corridor after vessels were rerouted around southern Africa in late 2023 following attacks in the Red Sea by Yemeni Houthi rebels, who claimed they were motivated by the war ⁠in Gaza and the plight ‌of Palestinians. A ceasefire in Gaza and subsequent lull in Houthi attacks had raised hopes for normalized traffic. After making limited ‍transits using naval escorts, the Marseille-based firm had been poised to expand its use of the route, sending two large container ships through the canal last month ​while planning regular transits from January for an India-U.S. service. CMA CGM DOESN'T ‌ELABORATE ON 'COMPLEX INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT' However, in a customer advisory posted on its website, CMA CGM said it would, for now, reroute vessels deployed on its French Asia Line 1 (FAL 1), French Asia Line 3 (FAL3) and Mediterranean Club Express (MEX) services via the Cape of Good Hope in southern Africa, citing "the complex ⁠and uncertain international context." CMA CGM, the world's ​third-largest container shipping line, did not elaborate on ​the global uncertainties. Since December, unrest in Iran and warnings by U.S. President Donald Trump of possible intervention by Washington have ‍revived worries about ⁠instability in the region, though Trump has in recent days said violence appears to be subsiding. Maersk, the world's second-largest container line, said last ⁠week that one of its services would cross the Red Sea and Suez Canal ‌from this month. (Reporting by Gus Trompiz; writing by Dominique Vidalon; editing ‌by Inti Landauro and Bernadette Baum)
    20.1.
    ·
    20.1.
    ·
    Can you tell me why AP is crashing again ????
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
80 päivää sitten1 t 1 min
1 120,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,53%Tuotto/v

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    What do you think: are we heading down now? Some banks/institutions have set low justified values for Maersk …
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    It doesn't really look like the shorts are exiting, it has been around 4.5% for a while now and is heading towards 5% again. The buyback program doesn't seem to scare them.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Welcome to a Good Friday for AP
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Are you short in it?
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    The collaboration between Mærsk and Hapag-Lloyd, known as Gemini Cooperation, appears to be a success based on preliminary results and ambitions for 2026. Reasons for the positive assessment: High punctuality: The alliance aims for a reliability of over 90 %. By the beginning of 2026, Gemini already has a reliability of around 89-91 % in the initial operational phases, which is significantly higher than the market average. Innovative network: The cooperation uses a "hub-and-spoke" model, where large vessels sail between central hubs, while smaller "shuttles" quickly distribute cargo to other ports. This reduces waiting times and increases flexibility. Operational savings: Already by the end of 2025, Hapag-Lloyd began to see the first operational savings as a result of the cooperation, and these are expected to become even more significant during 2026. Green transition: Both shipping companies are among the most ambitious regarding decarbonization. The cooperation allows them to optimize the fleet and better utilize fuel-efficient vessels. Challenges in 2026: External factors: Red Sea: Due to the security situation, the network continues to sail around Africa (Cape of Good Hope). Certain routes may begin to return to the Suez Canal in 2026, if security permits. Ramp-up phase: In the early phase, customers have experienced certain challenges with connections and space shortages, which the alliance is working to fully stabilize in 2026. Overall, the Gemini cooperation is considered one of the most promising shifts in the shipping industry in 2026, as it combines high service quality with lower operating costs. Mærsk yes sir. I'm damn well holding onto my 46stk
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    ...and for comparisons, there was 1120kr last year as well as buybacks for 14.4bn. So a slightly less good year than 24, but still fine. Add to that that APM has over 70% of the shares, so the stock is not super liquid. And in that context, it's worth noting. The company with a market value of 250bn, and outstanding share capital of 30% i.e., 75bn. dkk. This also means that APM actually only needs to put 50bn more into "itself", then they can own 90% of the share capital, and thus have the right to delist itself, and compulsorily buy back the rest of the company - this is naturally "rumors and conspiracy", but seen from APM's side, the annual profits might do better staying within the company, than pleasing a market that, as seen with APM glasses, constantly leans to the negative side. But in the short term, we might go down a bit more, and the financial report might again send the stock down (as it usually goes), but the underlying numbers tend to be good - for long-term shareholders. Enough about that - this is not a recommendation for anything, but merely a comment that we don't quite know which way the wind is blowing - when it comes to APM in the 3-4-5 year perspective...it will be exciting to see what happens. Ahoy!
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    The market as such is neither more negative nor more positive than it is justified. Being listed on the stock exchange can be cumbersome, and the Mærsk family has never liked to consider others. A delisting would mean they can score it all themselves, yes, but at the same time it also means that if there's turbulence, they will also have to take all the beatings themselves. And with madmen like Xi, Putin, and now with an even more unpredictable and mentally ill fascist leader also in the West, i.e. Trump, the world has clearly become even more uncertain and turbulent than almost ever before, so it's quite a chance to take to run it all themselves. If they move everything to usa, then it could be a fantastic idea.
  • 20.1.
    ·
    20.1.
    ·
    Possible reason for today's jump: Reuters Tue, 20 January 2026 at 10:01 am CET 2 min read PARIS, Jan 20 (Reuters) - Shipping group CMA CGM will re-reroute vessels on three of its services away from the Suez Canal ​due to global uncertainties, it said on Tuesday, reining in plans ‌to expand transits after two years of disruption linked to attacks on vessels. Shipping companies have ‌been weighing a return to the critical Asia-Europe trade corridor after vessels were rerouted around southern Africa in late 2023 following attacks in the Red Sea by Yemeni Houthi rebels, who claimed they were motivated by the war ⁠in Gaza and the plight ‌of Palestinians. A ceasefire in Gaza and subsequent lull in Houthi attacks had raised hopes for normalized traffic. After making limited ‍transits using naval escorts, the Marseille-based firm had been poised to expand its use of the route, sending two large container ships through the canal last month ​while planning regular transits from January for an India-U.S. service. CMA CGM DOESN'T ‌ELABORATE ON 'COMPLEX INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT' However, in a customer advisory posted on its website, CMA CGM said it would, for now, reroute vessels deployed on its French Asia Line 1 (FAL 1), French Asia Line 3 (FAL3) and Mediterranean Club Express (MEX) services via the Cape of Good Hope in southern Africa, citing "the complex ⁠and uncertain international context." CMA CGM, the world's ​third-largest container shipping line, did not elaborate on ​the global uncertainties. Since December, unrest in Iran and warnings by U.S. President Donald Trump of possible intervention by Washington have ‍revived worries about ⁠instability in the region, though Trump has in recent days said violence appears to be subsiding. Maersk, the world's second-largest container line, said last ⁠week that one of its services would cross the Red Sea and Suez Canal ‌from this month. (Reporting by Gus Trompiz; writing by Dominique Vidalon; editing ‌by Inti Landauro and Bernadette Baum)
    20.1.
    ·
    20.1.
    ·
    Can you tell me why AP is crashing again ????
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

DenmarkNasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
7 356
Myynti
Määrä
7 376

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
415ENSENS
35--
1--
5--
6--
Ylin
14 575
VWAP
14 405
Alin
14 280
VaihtoMäärä
296,3 20 578
VWAP
14 405
Ylin
14 575
Alin
14 280
VaihtoMäärä
296,3 20 578

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet
Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
5.2.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti6.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti8.5.2025
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 202518.3.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti6.2.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
80 päivää sitten1 t 1 min

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet
Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
5.2.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti6.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti8.5.2025
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 202518.3.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti6.2.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

1 120,00 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
7,53%Tuotto/v

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    What do you think: are we heading down now? Some banks/institutions have set low justified values for Maersk …
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    It doesn't really look like the shorts are exiting, it has been around 4.5% for a while now and is heading towards 5% again. The buyback program doesn't seem to scare them.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Welcome to a Good Friday for AP
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Are you short in it?
  • 3 päivää sitten
    ·
    3 päivää sitten
    ·
    The collaboration between Mærsk and Hapag-Lloyd, known as Gemini Cooperation, appears to be a success based on preliminary results and ambitions for 2026. Reasons for the positive assessment: High punctuality: The alliance aims for a reliability of over 90 %. By the beginning of 2026, Gemini already has a reliability of around 89-91 % in the initial operational phases, which is significantly higher than the market average. Innovative network: The cooperation uses a "hub-and-spoke" model, where large vessels sail between central hubs, while smaller "shuttles" quickly distribute cargo to other ports. This reduces waiting times and increases flexibility. Operational savings: Already by the end of 2025, Hapag-Lloyd began to see the first operational savings as a result of the cooperation, and these are expected to become even more significant during 2026. Green transition: Both shipping companies are among the most ambitious regarding decarbonization. The cooperation allows them to optimize the fleet and better utilize fuel-efficient vessels. Challenges in 2026: External factors: Red Sea: Due to the security situation, the network continues to sail around Africa (Cape of Good Hope). Certain routes may begin to return to the Suez Canal in 2026, if security permits. Ramp-up phase: In the early phase, customers have experienced certain challenges with connections and space shortages, which the alliance is working to fully stabilize in 2026. Overall, the Gemini cooperation is considered one of the most promising shifts in the shipping industry in 2026, as it combines high service quality with lower operating costs. Mærsk yes sir. I'm damn well holding onto my 46stk
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    ...and for comparisons, there was 1120kr last year as well as buybacks for 14.4bn. So a slightly less good year than 24, but still fine. Add to that that APM has over 70% of the shares, so the stock is not super liquid. And in that context, it's worth noting. The company with a market value of 250bn, and outstanding share capital of 30% i.e., 75bn. dkk. This also means that APM actually only needs to put 50bn more into "itself", then they can own 90% of the share capital, and thus have the right to delist itself, and compulsorily buy back the rest of the company - this is naturally "rumors and conspiracy", but seen from APM's side, the annual profits might do better staying within the company, than pleasing a market that, as seen with APM glasses, constantly leans to the negative side. But in the short term, we might go down a bit more, and the financial report might again send the stock down (as it usually goes), but the underlying numbers tend to be good - for long-term shareholders. Enough about that - this is not a recommendation for anything, but merely a comment that we don't quite know which way the wind is blowing - when it comes to APM in the 3-4-5 year perspective...it will be exciting to see what happens. Ahoy!
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    The market as such is neither more negative nor more positive than it is justified. Being listed on the stock exchange can be cumbersome, and the Mærsk family has never liked to consider others. A delisting would mean they can score it all themselves, yes, but at the same time it also means that if there's turbulence, they will also have to take all the beatings themselves. And with madmen like Xi, Putin, and now with an even more unpredictable and mentally ill fascist leader also in the West, i.e. Trump, the world has clearly become even more uncertain and turbulent than almost ever before, so it's quite a chance to take to run it all themselves. If they move everything to usa, then it could be a fantastic idea.
  • 20.1.
    ·
    20.1.
    ·
    Possible reason for today's jump: Reuters Tue, 20 January 2026 at 10:01 am CET 2 min read PARIS, Jan 20 (Reuters) - Shipping group CMA CGM will re-reroute vessels on three of its services away from the Suez Canal ​due to global uncertainties, it said on Tuesday, reining in plans ‌to expand transits after two years of disruption linked to attacks on vessels. Shipping companies have ‌been weighing a return to the critical Asia-Europe trade corridor after vessels were rerouted around southern Africa in late 2023 following attacks in the Red Sea by Yemeni Houthi rebels, who claimed they were motivated by the war ⁠in Gaza and the plight ‌of Palestinians. A ceasefire in Gaza and subsequent lull in Houthi attacks had raised hopes for normalized traffic. After making limited ‍transits using naval escorts, the Marseille-based firm had been poised to expand its use of the route, sending two large container ships through the canal last month ​while planning regular transits from January for an India-U.S. service. CMA CGM DOESN'T ‌ELABORATE ON 'COMPLEX INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT' However, in a customer advisory posted on its website, CMA CGM said it would, for now, reroute vessels deployed on its French Asia Line 1 (FAL 1), French Asia Line 3 (FAL3) and Mediterranean Club Express (MEX) services via the Cape of Good Hope in southern Africa, citing "the complex ⁠and uncertain international context." CMA CGM, the world's ​third-largest container shipping line, did not elaborate on ​the global uncertainties. Since December, unrest in Iran and warnings by U.S. President Donald Trump of possible intervention by Washington have ‍revived worries about ⁠instability in the region, though Trump has in recent days said violence appears to be subsiding. Maersk, the world's second-largest container line, said last ⁠week that one of its services would cross the Red Sea and Suez Canal ‌from this month. (Reporting by Gus Trompiz; writing by Dominique Vidalon; editing ‌by Inti Landauro and Bernadette Baum)
    20.1.
    ·
    20.1.
    ·
    Can you tell me why AP is crashing again ????
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

DenmarkNasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
7 356
Myynti
Määrä
7 376

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
415ENSENS
35--
1--
5--
6--
Ylin
14 575
VWAP
14 405
Alin
14 280
VaihtoMäärä
296,3 20 578
VWAP
14 405
Ylin
14 575
Alin
14 280
VaihtoMäärä
296,3 20 578

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt