Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut1,94%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori teollisuusmateriaalit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaSEK
- Lainoitusaste75%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The Sub-Fund’s investment objective is to achieve appropriate income and the highest possible longterm value increase by investing within: - Defense, aerospace and security sector (including homeland and cyber security); - Technology, commodity, infrastructure sectors necessary for society resilience, self-sufficiency, resource independence and for energy transition, digitalisation and electrification. The Sub-Fund will invest mainly in securities of companies without geographical restrictions with the exception of defense companies in Russia and China and in accordance with the principle of risk diversification. No guarantee can be given that the Sub-Fund’s objective will be reached.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Omistukset
Päivitetty 31.1.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet98,6%
- Lyhyt korko1,4%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenIt's so typical - I rebalanced a bit in the funds and moved 40% of the position here into mining funds, and right after the switch was completed, Hanwha goes up 19,83% overnight. 🙈
·2 päivää sittenStrait of Hormuz closed: Will set fire to any ship 2 min Intisaar Ali SHARE Iran's Revolutionary Guard's commander says that the Strait of Hormuz is closed, and that Iran will set fire to any ship that tries to pass, according to Iranian media. Reuters reports this.
·3 päivää sittenI'll put in a little extra on a buy today🤔- ·28.2.International Law – principle or political weapon? International law is often presented as civilization's highest standard. A neutral framework that holds states accountable regardless of who they are. But is that really how it works in practice? Look at the debate about the war in Gaza. Norwegian politicians, including Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide, repeatedly state that Israel's warfare is not in line with international law. That can be a legitimate assessment. But then it is natural to ask a follow-up question: Do we hold Iran to the same standard? Iran is no innocent bystander. The Iranian clerical regime has for years financed, trained, and armed Hamas and Hezbollah. Without Iranian support, the attack on October 7, 2023 – where over 1200 people were massacred and over 200 taken as hostages – would hardly have been possible to carry out. Iran fires ballistic missiles at Israeli cities. The Houthi movement, which Iran supports, attacks international shipping in the Red Sea in violation of maritime law. And within its own borders? Iran executes political dissidents, persecutes religious minorities, executes minors, and systematically oppresses women – all in violation of conventions the country itself has ratified. During the Women, Life, Freedom uprising in 2022-2023, hundreds were killed in the streets by security forces. The international community's reaction? A shrug. This is not a defense speech for Israel. It is a question of consistency. International law loses its legitimacy when it is used selectively. When democracies are held to a standard that authoritarian regimes are never confronted with. This happens partly because democracies actually care about international opinion and can be pressured. Iran does not. The pressure ends up where it is easiest to apply – not where it is most necessary. The result is international law that in practice functions as a political instrument. Conveniently available when it suits the foreign policy agenda, and discreetly set aside when it does not. It serves neither peace, justice, nor the civilian populations international law is meant to protect. If international law is to mean something, it must apply to everyone. Always. Not just when it is politically opportune. Relevant links: UN Declaration of Human Rights: https://www.fn.no/om-fn/avtaler/menneskerettigheter/fns-verdenserklaering-om-menneskerettigheter Human Rights Watch – Iran 2023: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/iran ICJ – the basis of international law: https://www.icj-cij.org/what-is-international-law Amnesty International – Iran: https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/middle-east-and-north-africa/iran/
·1 päivä sittenInteresting observations. Something I like about investing is that I believe not easily believing everything I read, not getting caught at all by polarizing trends, trying my best to look at companies and the world with objective glasses, raising my gaze to look at opportunities from a very long-term perspective, and surely something more :) Thanks. - ·28.2.🚨 USA and Israel attack Iran – what does that mean for Finserve Global Security, AuAg Silver Bullet and DNB Nuclear Energy? Today, February 28, 2026, what many have feared is happening: USA and Israel have launched coordinated attacks against Iran. President Trump refers to it as large combat operations with the goal of regime change. Iran responds with missiles against Israel, Bahrain, Qatar and Kuwait, and declares American and Israeli interests as legitimate targets. This is no longer a scenario. It is reality. 🛢️ Oil and the Strait of Hormuz – the great uncertainty Around 20 percent of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz daily. If Iranian export terminals or Kharg Island are hit, the oil price can quickly move sharply up. A blockade will send shockwaves through the global economy. The market reacts immediately to such risk. Energy prices are the first indicator of how seriously investors assess the situation. ⚔️ Finserve Global Security – this is the fund's scenario Finserve Global Security is exposed to defense and security. The conflict reinforces a trend that was already clear: Europe and the West are significantly increasing defense budgets. This is not just about a temporary crisis. Geopolitical instability has become a structural factor in budgeting and industrial planning. Order books in the defense industry were already solid. Such an escalation can provide further momentum. 🥈 AuAg Silver Bullet – safe haven and industrial metal AuAg Silver Bullet provides exposure to silver producers. Silver has a dual role: 1. Safe haven in periods of geopolitical unrest 2. Critical input factor in solar energy, electrification and technology Silver was already trading around 90 dollars per ounce this week – before the attacks started. Monday's opening will be interesting. At the same time, one must be prepared for volatility. Silver moves quickly in both directions. ⚛️ DNB Nuclear Energy – energy security at the center DNB Nuclear Energy also becomes relevant in this picture. When oil and gas supplies are threatened, the argument for stable, domestic power production is strengthened. Nuclear power has already received increased political support in Europe and the USA due to energy security and climate concerns. A new energy crisis can further accelerate investments in nuclear power. 📊 My positioning I am holding all three funds and making no changes now. My investment case has been: • Geopolitical instability • European rearmament • Structural demand for strategic raw materials and energy Today's events reinforce these trends. At the same time, we must be prepared for strong fluctuations and unpredictable developments. The oil price and the situation in the Strait of Hormuz will be key indicators in the coming days. What do you others think? Are you positioned for increased geopolitical risk?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut1,94%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori teollisuusmateriaalit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaSEK
- Lainoitusaste75%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The Sub-Fund’s investment objective is to achieve appropriate income and the highest possible longterm value increase by investing within: - Defense, aerospace and security sector (including homeland and cyber security); - Technology, commodity, infrastructure sectors necessary for society resilience, self-sufficiency, resource independence and for energy transition, digitalisation and electrification. The Sub-Fund will invest mainly in securities of companies without geographical restrictions with the exception of defense companies in Russia and China and in accordance with the principle of risk diversification. No guarantee can be given that the Sub-Fund’s objective will be reached.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Omistukset
Päivitetty 31.1.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet98,6%
- Lyhyt korko1,4%
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenIt's so typical - I rebalanced a bit in the funds and moved 40% of the position here into mining funds, and right after the switch was completed, Hanwha goes up 19,83% overnight. 🙈
- ·2 päivää sittenStrait of Hormuz closed: Will set fire to any ship 2 min Intisaar Ali SHARE Iran's Revolutionary Guard's commander says that the Strait of Hormuz is closed, and that Iran will set fire to any ship that tries to pass, according to Iranian media. Reuters reports this.
- ·3 päivää sittenI'll put in a little extra on a buy today🤔
- ·28.2.International Law – principle or political weapon? International law is often presented as civilization's highest standard. A neutral framework that holds states accountable regardless of who they are. But is that really how it works in practice? Look at the debate about the war in Gaza. Norwegian politicians, including Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide, repeatedly state that Israel's warfare is not in line with international law. That can be a legitimate assessment. But then it is natural to ask a follow-up question: Do we hold Iran to the same standard? Iran is no innocent bystander. The Iranian clerical regime has for years financed, trained, and armed Hamas and Hezbollah. Without Iranian support, the attack on October 7, 2023 – where over 1200 people were massacred and over 200 taken as hostages – would hardly have been possible to carry out. Iran fires ballistic missiles at Israeli cities. The Houthi movement, which Iran supports, attacks international shipping in the Red Sea in violation of maritime law. And within its own borders? Iran executes political dissidents, persecutes religious minorities, executes minors, and systematically oppresses women – all in violation of conventions the country itself has ratified. During the Women, Life, Freedom uprising in 2022-2023, hundreds were killed in the streets by security forces. The international community's reaction? A shrug. This is not a defense speech for Israel. It is a question of consistency. International law loses its legitimacy when it is used selectively. When democracies are held to a standard that authoritarian regimes are never confronted with. This happens partly because democracies actually care about international opinion and can be pressured. Iran does not. The pressure ends up where it is easiest to apply – not where it is most necessary. The result is international law that in practice functions as a political instrument. Conveniently available when it suits the foreign policy agenda, and discreetly set aside when it does not. It serves neither peace, justice, nor the civilian populations international law is meant to protect. If international law is to mean something, it must apply to everyone. Always. Not just when it is politically opportune. Relevant links: UN Declaration of Human Rights: https://www.fn.no/om-fn/avtaler/menneskerettigheter/fns-verdenserklaering-om-menneskerettigheter Human Rights Watch – Iran 2023: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/iran ICJ – the basis of international law: https://www.icj-cij.org/what-is-international-law Amnesty International – Iran: https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/middle-east-and-north-africa/iran/·1 päivä sittenInteresting observations. Something I like about investing is that I believe not easily believing everything I read, not getting caught at all by polarizing trends, trying my best to look at companies and the world with objective glasses, raising my gaze to look at opportunities from a very long-term perspective, and surely something more :) Thanks.
- ·28.2.🚨 USA and Israel attack Iran – what does that mean for Finserve Global Security, AuAg Silver Bullet and DNB Nuclear Energy? Today, February 28, 2026, what many have feared is happening: USA and Israel have launched coordinated attacks against Iran. President Trump refers to it as large combat operations with the goal of regime change. Iran responds with missiles against Israel, Bahrain, Qatar and Kuwait, and declares American and Israeli interests as legitimate targets. This is no longer a scenario. It is reality. 🛢️ Oil and the Strait of Hormuz – the great uncertainty Around 20 percent of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz daily. If Iranian export terminals or Kharg Island are hit, the oil price can quickly move sharply up. A blockade will send shockwaves through the global economy. The market reacts immediately to such risk. Energy prices are the first indicator of how seriously investors assess the situation. ⚔️ Finserve Global Security – this is the fund's scenario Finserve Global Security is exposed to defense and security. The conflict reinforces a trend that was already clear: Europe and the West are significantly increasing defense budgets. This is not just about a temporary crisis. Geopolitical instability has become a structural factor in budgeting and industrial planning. Order books in the defense industry were already solid. Such an escalation can provide further momentum. 🥈 AuAg Silver Bullet – safe haven and industrial metal AuAg Silver Bullet provides exposure to silver producers. Silver has a dual role: 1. Safe haven in periods of geopolitical unrest 2. Critical input factor in solar energy, electrification and technology Silver was already trading around 90 dollars per ounce this week – before the attacks started. Monday's opening will be interesting. At the same time, one must be prepared for volatility. Silver moves quickly in both directions. ⚛️ DNB Nuclear Energy – energy security at the center DNB Nuclear Energy also becomes relevant in this picture. When oil and gas supplies are threatened, the argument for stable, domestic power production is strengthened. Nuclear power has already received increased political support in Europe and the USA due to energy security and climate concerns. A new energy crisis can further accelerate investments in nuclear power. 📊 My positioning I am holding all three funds and making no changes now. My investment case has been: • Geopolitical instability • European rearmament • Structural demand for strategic raw materials and energy Today's events reinforce these trends. At the same time, we must be prepared for strong fluctuations and unpredictable developments. The oil price and the situation in the Strait of Hormuz will be key indicators in the coming days. What do you others think? Are you positioned for increased geopolitical risk?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tunnusluvut
Riskitaso
?
Keskimääräinen: 4 / 7
Tunnusluvut
- Juoksevat kulut1,94%
- OmaisuusluokkaOsake
- KategoriaSektori teollisuusmateriaalit osakkeet
- PerusvaluuttaSEK
- Lainoitusaste75%
- Avaintietoasiakirja
Tietoa rahastosta
The Sub-Fund’s investment objective is to achieve appropriate income and the highest possible longterm value increase by investing within: - Defense, aerospace and security sector (including homeland and cyber security); - Technology, commodity, infrastructure sectors necessary for society resilience, self-sufficiency, resource independence and for energy transition, digitalisation and electrification. The Sub-Fund will invest mainly in securities of companies without geographical restrictions with the exception of defense companies in Russia and China and in accordance with the principle of risk diversification. No guarantee can be given that the Sub-Fund’s objective will be reached.
Vastaavan tyyppisiä rahastoja
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenIt's so typical - I rebalanced a bit in the funds and moved 40% of the position here into mining funds, and right after the switch was completed, Hanwha goes up 19,83% overnight. 🙈
- ·2 päivää sittenStrait of Hormuz closed: Will set fire to any ship 2 min Intisaar Ali SHARE Iran's Revolutionary Guard's commander says that the Strait of Hormuz is closed, and that Iran will set fire to any ship that tries to pass, according to Iranian media. Reuters reports this.
- ·3 päivää sittenI'll put in a little extra on a buy today🤔
- ·28.2.International Law – principle or political weapon? International law is often presented as civilization's highest standard. A neutral framework that holds states accountable regardless of who they are. But is that really how it works in practice? Look at the debate about the war in Gaza. Norwegian politicians, including Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide, repeatedly state that Israel's warfare is not in line with international law. That can be a legitimate assessment. But then it is natural to ask a follow-up question: Do we hold Iran to the same standard? Iran is no innocent bystander. The Iranian clerical regime has for years financed, trained, and armed Hamas and Hezbollah. Without Iranian support, the attack on October 7, 2023 – where over 1200 people were massacred and over 200 taken as hostages – would hardly have been possible to carry out. Iran fires ballistic missiles at Israeli cities. The Houthi movement, which Iran supports, attacks international shipping in the Red Sea in violation of maritime law. And within its own borders? Iran executes political dissidents, persecutes religious minorities, executes minors, and systematically oppresses women – all in violation of conventions the country itself has ratified. During the Women, Life, Freedom uprising in 2022-2023, hundreds were killed in the streets by security forces. The international community's reaction? A shrug. This is not a defense speech for Israel. It is a question of consistency. International law loses its legitimacy when it is used selectively. When democracies are held to a standard that authoritarian regimes are never confronted with. This happens partly because democracies actually care about international opinion and can be pressured. Iran does not. The pressure ends up where it is easiest to apply – not where it is most necessary. The result is international law that in practice functions as a political instrument. Conveniently available when it suits the foreign policy agenda, and discreetly set aside when it does not. It serves neither peace, justice, nor the civilian populations international law is meant to protect. If international law is to mean something, it must apply to everyone. Always. Not just when it is politically opportune. Relevant links: UN Declaration of Human Rights: https://www.fn.no/om-fn/avtaler/menneskerettigheter/fns-verdenserklaering-om-menneskerettigheter Human Rights Watch – Iran 2023: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/iran ICJ – the basis of international law: https://www.icj-cij.org/what-is-international-law Amnesty International – Iran: https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/middle-east-and-north-africa/iran/·1 päivä sittenInteresting observations. Something I like about investing is that I believe not easily believing everything I read, not getting caught at all by polarizing trends, trying my best to look at companies and the world with objective glasses, raising my gaze to look at opportunities from a very long-term perspective, and surely something more :) Thanks.
- ·28.2.🚨 USA and Israel attack Iran – what does that mean for Finserve Global Security, AuAg Silver Bullet and DNB Nuclear Energy? Today, February 28, 2026, what many have feared is happening: USA and Israel have launched coordinated attacks against Iran. President Trump refers to it as large combat operations with the goal of regime change. Iran responds with missiles against Israel, Bahrain, Qatar and Kuwait, and declares American and Israeli interests as legitimate targets. This is no longer a scenario. It is reality. 🛢️ Oil and the Strait of Hormuz – the great uncertainty Around 20 percent of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz daily. If Iranian export terminals or Kharg Island are hit, the oil price can quickly move sharply up. A blockade will send shockwaves through the global economy. The market reacts immediately to such risk. Energy prices are the first indicator of how seriously investors assess the situation. ⚔️ Finserve Global Security – this is the fund's scenario Finserve Global Security is exposed to defense and security. The conflict reinforces a trend that was already clear: Europe and the West are significantly increasing defense budgets. This is not just about a temporary crisis. Geopolitical instability has become a structural factor in budgeting and industrial planning. Order books in the defense industry were already solid. Such an escalation can provide further momentum. 🥈 AuAg Silver Bullet – safe haven and industrial metal AuAg Silver Bullet provides exposure to silver producers. Silver has a dual role: 1. Safe haven in periods of geopolitical unrest 2. Critical input factor in solar energy, electrification and technology Silver was already trading around 90 dollars per ounce this week – before the attacks started. Monday's opening will be interesting. At the same time, one must be prepared for volatility. Silver moves quickly in both directions. ⚛️ DNB Nuclear Energy – energy security at the center DNB Nuclear Energy also becomes relevant in this picture. When oil and gas supplies are threatened, the argument for stable, domestic power production is strengthened. Nuclear power has already received increased political support in Europe and the USA due to energy security and climate concerns. A new energy crisis can further accelerate investments in nuclear power. 📊 My positioning I am holding all three funds and making no changes now. My investment case has been: • Geopolitical instability • European rearmament • Structural demand for strategic raw materials and energy Today's events reinforce these trends. At the same time, we must be prepared for strong fluctuations and unpredictable developments. The oil price and the situation in the Strait of Hormuz will be key indicators in the coming days. What do you others think? Are you positioned for increased geopolitical risk?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Omistukset
Päivitetty 31.1.2026
Jakauma
- Osakkeet98,6%
- Lyhyt korko1,4%