2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
99 päivää sitten0,268 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
5 046 838
Myynti
Määrä
1 686 104
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2. 7 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 30.10.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 15.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 8.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 1.11.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·2 t sittenDoes anyone know if this is true? Then it looks like they have deliberately let akh die out by keeping akh alive until the complaint deadlines for the merger of the properties have passed and claiming that they have tried everything to find something they can use akh for, they just let it die with unpaid debt. Aker can take the deficit (17 billion NOK) with them when they let AKH die out. This is how it works in practice: The deficit remains in the estate When AKH goes into winding up/liquidation, the carried forward loss (and the tax value of ~3.74 billion NOK) remains in the liquidation estate. Aker ASA or Nscale can buy up the remains cheaply Aker ASA (which owns 67 % of AKH) can buy up debt claims or any small assets in the estate at a very low price (often almost for free, since there are no other buyers). They can then merge or transfer the deficit internally to a company that actually makes money (e.g., Nscale or another Aker company). The tax advantage is moved "for free" The deficit can be transferred in intra-group transactions without triggering tax (group contribution or merger). When Nscale or another Aker company makes money (e.g., from Stargate or Korgen), they can use the deficit to cut tax – without the minority shareholders in AKH getting a single penny from it. It is legal (as long as it follows the Companies Act and tax rules), but it feels outrageous because: The minorities get nothing. The Aker group gets the tax advantage "for free" after they have moved out the good bits (Narvik properties, projects) and let the shell die. That's why many write "slow-motion-robbing" or "planned from May" – they kept the shell alive just long enough to avoid complaints, and now they take the tax gold with them while we are left with 0.04 kr and an empty account.
·22 min sittenRobin Hood is a legendary English folk hero, known for stealing from the poor and giving to the rich.😎.
·11 t sittenA small guessing competition for how high and low we will go before a decision on delisting is to be made on 26/2. Starting by guessing <0.02 / 0.16>
·1 t sittenIf one anyway gets 0.04 per share if it's liquidated, then it surely won't go below that?- ·17 t sittenHope that there are 10% of shareholders who will demand an investigation of AKH 🤞🤞🤞
- ·16 t sitten · MuokattuProposal for liquidation is to be voted on at an extraordinary general meeting. What are the chances that the proposal will be voted down? What will the share price be if it is voted down? Possibly someone buys some "tickets" now at 1/10 of the price, which was a rat trap mousetrap in that case. Good opportunities to lower GAV now, at least in case this can be turned around.·12 t sittenAker Holdco owns 67.25% of the shares. Who controls this company? Is it the same people who sit on the board of Aker Horizons? The 67.25% of the shares have fallen just as much in value per share as ours. Is that something Holdco can live with? And what happens then with the carried forward deficit that made us speculate whether Nscale would be brought in? Do they let it disappear into thin air? I still think there are some loose ends here.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
99 päivää sitten0,268 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenDoes anyone know if this is true? Then it looks like they have deliberately let akh die out by keeping akh alive until the complaint deadlines for the merger of the properties have passed and claiming that they have tried everything to find something they can use akh for, they just let it die with unpaid debt. Aker can take the deficit (17 billion NOK) with them when they let AKH die out. This is how it works in practice: The deficit remains in the estate When AKH goes into winding up/liquidation, the carried forward loss (and the tax value of ~3.74 billion NOK) remains in the liquidation estate. Aker ASA or Nscale can buy up the remains cheaply Aker ASA (which owns 67 % of AKH) can buy up debt claims or any small assets in the estate at a very low price (often almost for free, since there are no other buyers). They can then merge or transfer the deficit internally to a company that actually makes money (e.g., Nscale or another Aker company). The tax advantage is moved "for free" The deficit can be transferred in intra-group transactions without triggering tax (group contribution or merger). When Nscale or another Aker company makes money (e.g., from Stargate or Korgen), they can use the deficit to cut tax – without the minority shareholders in AKH getting a single penny from it. It is legal (as long as it follows the Companies Act and tax rules), but it feels outrageous because: The minorities get nothing. The Aker group gets the tax advantage "for free" after they have moved out the good bits (Narvik properties, projects) and let the shell die. That's why many write "slow-motion-robbing" or "planned from May" – they kept the shell alive just long enough to avoid complaints, and now they take the tax gold with them while we are left with 0.04 kr and an empty account.·22 min sittenRobin Hood is a legendary English folk hero, known for stealing from the poor and giving to the rich.😎.
- ·11 t sittenA small guessing competition for how high and low we will go before a decision on delisting is to be made on 26/2. Starting by guessing <0.02 / 0.16>·1 t sittenIf one anyway gets 0.04 per share if it's liquidated, then it surely won't go below that?
- ·17 t sittenHope that there are 10% of shareholders who will demand an investigation of AKH 🤞🤞🤞
- ·16 t sitten · MuokattuProposal for liquidation is to be voted on at an extraordinary general meeting. What are the chances that the proposal will be voted down? What will the share price be if it is voted down? Possibly someone buys some "tickets" now at 1/10 of the price, which was a rat trap mousetrap in that case. Good opportunities to lower GAV now, at least in case this can be turned around.·12 t sittenAker Holdco owns 67.25% of the shares. Who controls this company? Is it the same people who sit on the board of Aker Horizons? The 67.25% of the shares have fallen just as much in value per share as ours. Is that something Holdco can live with? And what happens then with the carried forward deficit that made us speculate whether Nscale would be brought in? Do they let it disappear into thin air? I still think there are some loose ends here.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
5 046 838
Myynti
Määrä
1 686 104
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2. 7 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 30.10.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 15.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 8.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 1.11.2024 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
99 päivää sittenUutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2. 7 päivää |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 30.10.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 15.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 8.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 1.11.2024 |
0,268 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,00%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 t sittenDoes anyone know if this is true? Then it looks like they have deliberately let akh die out by keeping akh alive until the complaint deadlines for the merger of the properties have passed and claiming that they have tried everything to find something they can use akh for, they just let it die with unpaid debt. Aker can take the deficit (17 billion NOK) with them when they let AKH die out. This is how it works in practice: The deficit remains in the estate When AKH goes into winding up/liquidation, the carried forward loss (and the tax value of ~3.74 billion NOK) remains in the liquidation estate. Aker ASA or Nscale can buy up the remains cheaply Aker ASA (which owns 67 % of AKH) can buy up debt claims or any small assets in the estate at a very low price (often almost for free, since there are no other buyers). They can then merge or transfer the deficit internally to a company that actually makes money (e.g., Nscale or another Aker company). The tax advantage is moved "for free" The deficit can be transferred in intra-group transactions without triggering tax (group contribution or merger). When Nscale or another Aker company makes money (e.g., from Stargate or Korgen), they can use the deficit to cut tax – without the minority shareholders in AKH getting a single penny from it. It is legal (as long as it follows the Companies Act and tax rules), but it feels outrageous because: The minorities get nothing. The Aker group gets the tax advantage "for free" after they have moved out the good bits (Narvik properties, projects) and let the shell die. That's why many write "slow-motion-robbing" or "planned from May" – they kept the shell alive just long enough to avoid complaints, and now they take the tax gold with them while we are left with 0.04 kr and an empty account.·22 min sittenRobin Hood is a legendary English folk hero, known for stealing from the poor and giving to the rich.😎.
- ·11 t sittenA small guessing competition for how high and low we will go before a decision on delisting is to be made on 26/2. Starting by guessing <0.02 / 0.16>·1 t sittenIf one anyway gets 0.04 per share if it's liquidated, then it surely won't go below that?
- ·17 t sittenHope that there are 10% of shareholders who will demand an investigation of AKH 🤞🤞🤞
- ·16 t sitten · MuokattuProposal for liquidation is to be voted on at an extraordinary general meeting. What are the chances that the proposal will be voted down? What will the share price be if it is voted down? Possibly someone buys some "tickets" now at 1/10 of the price, which was a rat trap mousetrap in that case. Good opportunities to lower GAV now, at least in case this can be turned around.·12 t sittenAker Holdco owns 67.25% of the shares. Who controls this company? Is it the same people who sit on the board of Aker Horizons? The 67.25% of the shares have fallen just as much in value per share as ours. Is that something Holdco can live with? And what happens then with the carried forward deficit that made us speculate whether Nscale would be brought in? Do they let it disappear into thin air? I still think there are some loose ends here.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
5 046 838
Myynti
Määrä
1 686 104
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt