2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧43 min
0,70 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 28.5.
6,48%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 15.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 6.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·11 t sitten · MuokattuWell, another Sunday, where I usually do a small "deep dive" on a stock. I had actually thought of taking OET or FRO, but there are already many sensible takes on them - and for some strange reason, there isn't much activity on Torm (compared to, for example, FRO). So now I'm taking Torm again - also because I believe it's the best buy in tank right now (and yes, that's why it's my largest position - but I also have over 30% of the portfolio in other tank). I have now looked for "the holes in the cheese" on Torm to see if there was anything I had overlooked in q1 and outlook. But I actually can't find anything that should be alarming. In reality, I discovered that the drop in price and new estimates on current vessel values mean that Torm de facto trades at NAV at market close on Friday on NASDAQ. Virtually all other tanker shipping companies currently trade with a significant premium compared to NAV (except Tsakos, which as always trades below NAV). This in itself makes Torm "more secure and consolidated". When this is held against the fact that Torm is raking in money in flies' quantities, with an average in q2 of over $71k/day - and with very efficient cash break even - then I will still stick to my previous analyses = Torm is the best tanker cash cow currently. I won't bore you by repeating myself too much, but LR2 being pulled over due to lack of suezmax and Aframax and increased ton/mil, which then leaves more demand for MR etc etc. You've heard that before and it still applies. Is that a guarantee that there won't be more craziness in the price? No, as said so many times before, tank is a very volatile sector - and the 3rd Gulf War has meant that tank (and oil for that matter) has gained many new shareholders. They often trade on "emotions" and combined with algorithmic trading and other junk - then sometimes what happened last week happens. Am I still "all in"? YES!
·3 t sittenThoughts for a Sunday. As you yourself point out, you repeat yourself, you don't write any info that you haven't written before, yet you get many thumbs up. We are indeed so happy that others believe the same as ourselves. You can certainly repeat it. Info about Torm or for that matter other stocks is only welcome if it aligns with our own opinion, but then we also gobble it up. We become negative if someone plays devil's advocate or finds the hair in our soup. And many of us have that problem.·1 t sitten · MuokattuNet asset value - that is, the net value of the ships that Torm owns. The question here is whether one considers that parameter irrelevant or not. I, for my part, believe that it is significant - and others do not. So be it.- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuWell, I'm taking more of a beating in my NASDAQ Torm holding today. I'm still holding them - believe in the case even though it's now down by 25% of my total portfolio. Not considering selling for a second. Hope I'm right 😀
·1 päivä sittenBut why buy the American Torm?·1 päivä sittenAt times, my job gets in the way of my hobby, so I don't get to trade in DK - and once I've made up my mind, I might end up buying dual-listed shares on NYSE/NASDAQ.....even though it costs me a bit in currency fees. There's no deeper meaning than that. - ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuWell, now I've had time to dive into the report. Here's my take on it: Torm has chosen a strategy of increasing the fleet by 8 vessels (two 2015 already from q2). They have done this because they must believe in the future market (alternatively, they could have simply maintained the number, or done "a DNORD" and sold vessels during the 25% increase in NAV that has occurred). The consequence of this choice means that the q1 pay out ratio was only 58% instead of Torm's expected modus of 82% - which in cold cash means that we get $0.7 instead of the expected $1 (I should just mention my expectations). Regarding the outlook, Torm guides for 2026 EBITDA of between $800 million to $1.1 billion - which is quite good for the owners of the 101 million shares. How Torm lands naturally depends on how the remaining 20,000 spot days of the year are sold. Right now it looks wildly good with historically high rates, mex currently average of almost $72k per day. This is driven by an already good rate level, which has been accelerated by the Iran crisis, sending product tankers on "long haul" voyages, which then increases ton-miles, which in turn drives demand. Why this drop today then? I think it was a combination of these factors: 1. A previously seen "sell the news" effect and profit taking. 2. Now there are again rumors that the Iran conflict will be over soon. This again meant a macro shift away from energy and tankers, as all the other times this narrative has spread in the Market. 3. Rates generally on tankers have fallen from fantasy rates to "just really high rates". 4. For Torm specifically, the strategy of fleet expansion has meant that Torm shareholders will receive less dividend this year (I have now re-evaluated my own estimate from $6-7 down to around $5) Am I still keen on Torm then? Yes, I have increased by 33% today at approx 208, as overall I like what I was presented with. And I expect that management believes in the future with lots of good voyages after an opening of Hormuz (otherwise they would not have increased the fleet).·3 päivää sittenOkay several things - let me start with the last first - the oil. I can easily see that the crisis can push for green transition. However, this will initially happen in the more prosperous countries. The countries where population growth is rising the most do not have the same extent of funds for new expensive technology, but must rely on much cheaper fossil solutions. Therefore, many macroeconomic analyses point to oil consumption rising and only peaking in 2035 (there are certainly more analyses pointing to other years - but the trend is the same). As for Torm and dividend, I mentioned it as a possible trigger - among several - for why people sold out on an otherwise really good report. There are many who are in Torm precisely for this - and for example hate Scorpio Tankers because they are not so dividend-friendly and hoard money. Personally, it means less to me, as I always go for the case. Whether they pay out, buy back shares or invest to earn more cash is all fine by me. But I don't like companies that sit on a large pile of inactive cash. If Torm believes that it is a better business with 8 extra ships - then that's fine by me. I have very great confidence in Torm's management - which is why I increased my already very large Torm portfolio by 33% when the price dropped to 208 yesterday. Torm outlook and results showed that they actually earn the money I had bet on. And great that so many want to debate the Torm case.
·3 päivää sittenToday we once again truly saw what AI-controlled algorithmic trading can do to a stock, which after a good earnings report reached a price increase of 10 kr. only to subsequently fall with a price decrease of 7.2 kr. It is also a very clear example of why Novo and many other stocks have had it extra difficult and are not allowed to move much. Some will surely stubbornly maintain that it's just profit-taking. So be it.·3 päivää sittenAlright, my planned-economy friend. I agree - especially when it's followed by the "lemming effect". Now you can call me a grumpy old boomer - but 4 weeks ago I went through the same thing with Petronor. There was the same sudden incomprehensible dynamic, and it was knocked down to 12.5 NOK.......4 weeks later - as of today - it trades at 17.64 NOK. I have learned to sit calmly when these things happen, without there being a reason for massive price drops. In my view, today's result is completely silly.....but that's just my opinion!
·13.5.Why is it diving now when the press has highlighted it. Maybe that's why ?
·3 päivää sittenpeople over at Frontline write that there is massive robot trading from USA at their opening, that triggers a lot of auto stop loos 🤔
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧43 min
0,70 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 28.5.
6,48%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·11 t sitten · MuokattuWell, another Sunday, where I usually do a small "deep dive" on a stock. I had actually thought of taking OET or FRO, but there are already many sensible takes on them - and for some strange reason, there isn't much activity on Torm (compared to, for example, FRO). So now I'm taking Torm again - also because I believe it's the best buy in tank right now (and yes, that's why it's my largest position - but I also have over 30% of the portfolio in other tank). I have now looked for "the holes in the cheese" on Torm to see if there was anything I had overlooked in q1 and outlook. But I actually can't find anything that should be alarming. In reality, I discovered that the drop in price and new estimates on current vessel values mean that Torm de facto trades at NAV at market close on Friday on NASDAQ. Virtually all other tanker shipping companies currently trade with a significant premium compared to NAV (except Tsakos, which as always trades below NAV). This in itself makes Torm "more secure and consolidated". When this is held against the fact that Torm is raking in money in flies' quantities, with an average in q2 of over $71k/day - and with very efficient cash break even - then I will still stick to my previous analyses = Torm is the best tanker cash cow currently. I won't bore you by repeating myself too much, but LR2 being pulled over due to lack of suezmax and Aframax and increased ton/mil, which then leaves more demand for MR etc etc. You've heard that before and it still applies. Is that a guarantee that there won't be more craziness in the price? No, as said so many times before, tank is a very volatile sector - and the 3rd Gulf War has meant that tank (and oil for that matter) has gained many new shareholders. They often trade on "emotions" and combined with algorithmic trading and other junk - then sometimes what happened last week happens. Am I still "all in"? YES!·3 t sittenThoughts for a Sunday. As you yourself point out, you repeat yourself, you don't write any info that you haven't written before, yet you get many thumbs up. We are indeed so happy that others believe the same as ourselves. You can certainly repeat it. Info about Torm or for that matter other stocks is only welcome if it aligns with our own opinion, but then we also gobble it up. We become negative if someone plays devil's advocate or finds the hair in our soup. And many of us have that problem.·1 t sitten · MuokattuNet asset value - that is, the net value of the ships that Torm owns. The question here is whether one considers that parameter irrelevant or not. I, for my part, believe that it is significant - and others do not. So be it.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuWell, I'm taking more of a beating in my NASDAQ Torm holding today. I'm still holding them - believe in the case even though it's now down by 25% of my total portfolio. Not considering selling for a second. Hope I'm right 😀·1 päivä sittenBut why buy the American Torm?·1 päivä sittenAt times, my job gets in the way of my hobby, so I don't get to trade in DK - and once I've made up my mind, I might end up buying dual-listed shares on NYSE/NASDAQ.....even though it costs me a bit in currency fees. There's no deeper meaning than that.
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuWell, now I've had time to dive into the report. Here's my take on it: Torm has chosen a strategy of increasing the fleet by 8 vessels (two 2015 already from q2). They have done this because they must believe in the future market (alternatively, they could have simply maintained the number, or done "a DNORD" and sold vessels during the 25% increase in NAV that has occurred). The consequence of this choice means that the q1 pay out ratio was only 58% instead of Torm's expected modus of 82% - which in cold cash means that we get $0.7 instead of the expected $1 (I should just mention my expectations). Regarding the outlook, Torm guides for 2026 EBITDA of between $800 million to $1.1 billion - which is quite good for the owners of the 101 million shares. How Torm lands naturally depends on how the remaining 20,000 spot days of the year are sold. Right now it looks wildly good with historically high rates, mex currently average of almost $72k per day. This is driven by an already good rate level, which has been accelerated by the Iran crisis, sending product tankers on "long haul" voyages, which then increases ton-miles, which in turn drives demand. Why this drop today then? I think it was a combination of these factors: 1. A previously seen "sell the news" effect and profit taking. 2. Now there are again rumors that the Iran conflict will be over soon. This again meant a macro shift away from energy and tankers, as all the other times this narrative has spread in the Market. 3. Rates generally on tankers have fallen from fantasy rates to "just really high rates". 4. For Torm specifically, the strategy of fleet expansion has meant that Torm shareholders will receive less dividend this year (I have now re-evaluated my own estimate from $6-7 down to around $5) Am I still keen on Torm then? Yes, I have increased by 33% today at approx 208, as overall I like what I was presented with. And I expect that management believes in the future with lots of good voyages after an opening of Hormuz (otherwise they would not have increased the fleet).·3 päivää sittenOkay several things - let me start with the last first - the oil. I can easily see that the crisis can push for green transition. However, this will initially happen in the more prosperous countries. The countries where population growth is rising the most do not have the same extent of funds for new expensive technology, but must rely on much cheaper fossil solutions. Therefore, many macroeconomic analyses point to oil consumption rising and only peaking in 2035 (there are certainly more analyses pointing to other years - but the trend is the same). As for Torm and dividend, I mentioned it as a possible trigger - among several - for why people sold out on an otherwise really good report. There are many who are in Torm precisely for this - and for example hate Scorpio Tankers because they are not so dividend-friendly and hoard money. Personally, it means less to me, as I always go for the case. Whether they pay out, buy back shares or invest to earn more cash is all fine by me. But I don't like companies that sit on a large pile of inactive cash. If Torm believes that it is a better business with 8 extra ships - then that's fine by me. I have very great confidence in Torm's management - which is why I increased my already very large Torm portfolio by 33% when the price dropped to 208 yesterday. Torm outlook and results showed that they actually earn the money I had bet on. And great that so many want to debate the Torm case.
- ·3 päivää sittenToday we once again truly saw what AI-controlled algorithmic trading can do to a stock, which after a good earnings report reached a price increase of 10 kr. only to subsequently fall with a price decrease of 7.2 kr. It is also a very clear example of why Novo and many other stocks have had it extra difficult and are not allowed to move much. Some will surely stubbornly maintain that it's just profit-taking. So be it.·3 päivää sittenAlright, my planned-economy friend. I agree - especially when it's followed by the "lemming effect". Now you can call me a grumpy old boomer - but 4 weeks ago I went through the same thing with Petronor. There was the same sudden incomprehensible dynamic, and it was knocked down to 12.5 NOK.......4 weeks later - as of today - it trades at 17.64 NOK. I have learned to sit calmly when these things happen, without there being a reason for massive price drops. In my view, today's result is completely silly.....but that's just my opinion!
- ·13.5.Why is it diving now when the press has highlighted it. Maybe that's why ?·3 päivää sittenpeople over at Frontline write that there is massive robot trading from USA at their opening, that triggers a lot of auto stop loos 🤔
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 15.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 6.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
4 päivää sitten
‧43 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 26.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 13.5. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 15.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 6.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 14.8.2025 |
0,70 USD/osake
Irtoamispäivä 28.5.
6,48%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·11 t sitten · MuokattuWell, another Sunday, where I usually do a small "deep dive" on a stock. I had actually thought of taking OET or FRO, but there are already many sensible takes on them - and for some strange reason, there isn't much activity on Torm (compared to, for example, FRO). So now I'm taking Torm again - also because I believe it's the best buy in tank right now (and yes, that's why it's my largest position - but I also have over 30% of the portfolio in other tank). I have now looked for "the holes in the cheese" on Torm to see if there was anything I had overlooked in q1 and outlook. But I actually can't find anything that should be alarming. In reality, I discovered that the drop in price and new estimates on current vessel values mean that Torm de facto trades at NAV at market close on Friday on NASDAQ. Virtually all other tanker shipping companies currently trade with a significant premium compared to NAV (except Tsakos, which as always trades below NAV). This in itself makes Torm "more secure and consolidated". When this is held against the fact that Torm is raking in money in flies' quantities, with an average in q2 of over $71k/day - and with very efficient cash break even - then I will still stick to my previous analyses = Torm is the best tanker cash cow currently. I won't bore you by repeating myself too much, but LR2 being pulled over due to lack of suezmax and Aframax and increased ton/mil, which then leaves more demand for MR etc etc. You've heard that before and it still applies. Is that a guarantee that there won't be more craziness in the price? No, as said so many times before, tank is a very volatile sector - and the 3rd Gulf War has meant that tank (and oil for that matter) has gained many new shareholders. They often trade on "emotions" and combined with algorithmic trading and other junk - then sometimes what happened last week happens. Am I still "all in"? YES!·3 t sittenThoughts for a Sunday. As you yourself point out, you repeat yourself, you don't write any info that you haven't written before, yet you get many thumbs up. We are indeed so happy that others believe the same as ourselves. You can certainly repeat it. Info about Torm or for that matter other stocks is only welcome if it aligns with our own opinion, but then we also gobble it up. We become negative if someone plays devil's advocate or finds the hair in our soup. And many of us have that problem.·1 t sitten · MuokattuNet asset value - that is, the net value of the ships that Torm owns. The question here is whether one considers that parameter irrelevant or not. I, for my part, believe that it is significant - and others do not. So be it.
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuWell, I'm taking more of a beating in my NASDAQ Torm holding today. I'm still holding them - believe in the case even though it's now down by 25% of my total portfolio. Not considering selling for a second. Hope I'm right 😀·1 päivä sittenBut why buy the American Torm?·1 päivä sittenAt times, my job gets in the way of my hobby, so I don't get to trade in DK - and once I've made up my mind, I might end up buying dual-listed shares on NYSE/NASDAQ.....even though it costs me a bit in currency fees. There's no deeper meaning than that.
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuWell, now I've had time to dive into the report. Here's my take on it: Torm has chosen a strategy of increasing the fleet by 8 vessels (two 2015 already from q2). They have done this because they must believe in the future market (alternatively, they could have simply maintained the number, or done "a DNORD" and sold vessels during the 25% increase in NAV that has occurred). The consequence of this choice means that the q1 pay out ratio was only 58% instead of Torm's expected modus of 82% - which in cold cash means that we get $0.7 instead of the expected $1 (I should just mention my expectations). Regarding the outlook, Torm guides for 2026 EBITDA of between $800 million to $1.1 billion - which is quite good for the owners of the 101 million shares. How Torm lands naturally depends on how the remaining 20,000 spot days of the year are sold. Right now it looks wildly good with historically high rates, mex currently average of almost $72k per day. This is driven by an already good rate level, which has been accelerated by the Iran crisis, sending product tankers on "long haul" voyages, which then increases ton-miles, which in turn drives demand. Why this drop today then? I think it was a combination of these factors: 1. A previously seen "sell the news" effect and profit taking. 2. Now there are again rumors that the Iran conflict will be over soon. This again meant a macro shift away from energy and tankers, as all the other times this narrative has spread in the Market. 3. Rates generally on tankers have fallen from fantasy rates to "just really high rates". 4. For Torm specifically, the strategy of fleet expansion has meant that Torm shareholders will receive less dividend this year (I have now re-evaluated my own estimate from $6-7 down to around $5) Am I still keen on Torm then? Yes, I have increased by 33% today at approx 208, as overall I like what I was presented with. And I expect that management believes in the future with lots of good voyages after an opening of Hormuz (otherwise they would not have increased the fleet).·3 päivää sittenOkay several things - let me start with the last first - the oil. I can easily see that the crisis can push for green transition. However, this will initially happen in the more prosperous countries. The countries where population growth is rising the most do not have the same extent of funds for new expensive technology, but must rely on much cheaper fossil solutions. Therefore, many macroeconomic analyses point to oil consumption rising and only peaking in 2035 (there are certainly more analyses pointing to other years - but the trend is the same). As for Torm and dividend, I mentioned it as a possible trigger - among several - for why people sold out on an otherwise really good report. There are many who are in Torm precisely for this - and for example hate Scorpio Tankers because they are not so dividend-friendly and hoard money. Personally, it means less to me, as I always go for the case. Whether they pay out, buy back shares or invest to earn more cash is all fine by me. But I don't like companies that sit on a large pile of inactive cash. If Torm believes that it is a better business with 8 extra ships - then that's fine by me. I have very great confidence in Torm's management - which is why I increased my already very large Torm portfolio by 33% when the price dropped to 208 yesterday. Torm outlook and results showed that they actually earn the money I had bet on. And great that so many want to debate the Torm case.
- ·3 päivää sittenToday we once again truly saw what AI-controlled algorithmic trading can do to a stock, which after a good earnings report reached a price increase of 10 kr. only to subsequently fall with a price decrease of 7.2 kr. It is also a very clear example of why Novo and many other stocks have had it extra difficult and are not allowed to move much. Some will surely stubbornly maintain that it's just profit-taking. So be it.·3 päivää sittenAlright, my planned-economy friend. I agree - especially when it's followed by the "lemming effect". Now you can call me a grumpy old boomer - but 4 weeks ago I went through the same thing with Petronor. There was the same sudden incomprehensible dynamic, and it was knocked down to 12.5 NOK.......4 weeks later - as of today - it trades at 17.64 NOK. I have learned to sit calmly when these things happen, without there being a reason for massive price drops. In my view, today's result is completely silly.....but that's just my opinion!
- ·13.5.Why is it diving now when the press has highlighted it. Maybe that's why ?·3 päivää sittenpeople over at Frontline write that there is massive robot trading from USA at their opening, that triggers a lot of auto stop loos 🤔
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt