2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
51 päivää sitten
‧31 min
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 567 | - | - | ||
| 1 091 | - | - | ||
| 2 498 | - | - | ||
| 1 458 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 20.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 28.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·21 t sitten · MuokattuHypothesis: ELABS is being prepared for acquisition. Management: CEO: Former product manager and investor relations manager. So not a salesperson, but someone whose strength is in product, and with experience with investors. CFO: ex-auditor from PwC. Here there should be no more curve-balls in the financial reporting. Focus on accuracy and secure management, exactly what the market needs now to rebuild trust. Product, not sales: Large industry players are often not as concerned with revenue, customer base, and bottom line in immature companies as private investors are. They are (of course, somewhat dependent on the purpose of the M&A case) typically more interested in the product and how it complements or improves their existing portfolio, as well as the competence in the team they acquire, i.e., synergies. However, they are often unwilling to take significant product risk, so the evidence that the technology works and scales must be strong before anyone expresses concrete interest. This is about product, not sales, and is the core competence of the new CEO. And in a due diligence process, correct, clear books and good management systems (the new CFO's core competence) are valued more than visions and sales pitches. Share issues: The share issue rounds argue against them being in dialogue about an acquisition now, which in turn may indicate that ELABS is a ways off from having strong (enough) evidence of the technology's value and scalability. At the same time, M&A processes are often long. Both factors mean that the war chest had to be filled up. In addition, the cost base is being slimmed down, which is positive from an acquisition perspective because it reduces the buyer's PnL risk. The cost cut, however, could also be motivated by survival rather than acquisition. Disclaimer: I have been invested in ELABS before and sold at a loss. I still believe in the company both as a growth case and for acquisition, but right now it seems that the company is being prepared for acquisition. However, there will be no new entry from my side until the question of a repeat share issue is clarified…
·1 päivä sittenTranche 1 and 2 completed. What about the repair issue? When will this eventually be decided? It's been a while since the EGM now
3 päivää sitten3 päivää sittenI feel like we are good to go for some sideways development for quite some time.. I'm considering taking the 50% loss and move on
·2 päivää sittenIt would be very nice if everyone could discuss Elab and not other companies here on the forum. I own shares in several places but I don't think I should start writing about them here.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
51 päivää sitten
‧31 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·21 t sitten · MuokattuHypothesis: ELABS is being prepared for acquisition. Management: CEO: Former product manager and investor relations manager. So not a salesperson, but someone whose strength is in product, and with experience with investors. CFO: ex-auditor from PwC. Here there should be no more curve-balls in the financial reporting. Focus on accuracy and secure management, exactly what the market needs now to rebuild trust. Product, not sales: Large industry players are often not as concerned with revenue, customer base, and bottom line in immature companies as private investors are. They are (of course, somewhat dependent on the purpose of the M&A case) typically more interested in the product and how it complements or improves their existing portfolio, as well as the competence in the team they acquire, i.e., synergies. However, they are often unwilling to take significant product risk, so the evidence that the technology works and scales must be strong before anyone expresses concrete interest. This is about product, not sales, and is the core competence of the new CEO. And in a due diligence process, correct, clear books and good management systems (the new CFO's core competence) are valued more than visions and sales pitches. Share issues: The share issue rounds argue against them being in dialogue about an acquisition now, which in turn may indicate that ELABS is a ways off from having strong (enough) evidence of the technology's value and scalability. At the same time, M&A processes are often long. Both factors mean that the war chest had to be filled up. In addition, the cost base is being slimmed down, which is positive from an acquisition perspective because it reduces the buyer's PnL risk. The cost cut, however, could also be motivated by survival rather than acquisition. Disclaimer: I have been invested in ELABS before and sold at a loss. I still believe in the company both as a growth case and for acquisition, but right now it seems that the company is being prepared for acquisition. However, there will be no new entry from my side until the question of a repeat share issue is clarified…
- ·1 päivä sittenTranche 1 and 2 completed. What about the repair issue? When will this eventually be decided? It's been a while since the EGM now
- 3 päivää sitten3 päivää sittenI feel like we are good to go for some sideways development for quite some time.. I'm considering taking the 50% loss and move on·2 päivää sittenIt would be very nice if everyone could discuss Elab and not other companies here on the forum. I own shares in several places but I don't think I should start writing about them here.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 567 | - | - | ||
| 1 091 | - | - | ||
| 2 498 | - | - | ||
| 1 458 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 20.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 28.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
51 päivää sitten
‧31 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 20.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 28.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 22.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·21 t sitten · MuokattuHypothesis: ELABS is being prepared for acquisition. Management: CEO: Former product manager and investor relations manager. So not a salesperson, but someone whose strength is in product, and with experience with investors. CFO: ex-auditor from PwC. Here there should be no more curve-balls in the financial reporting. Focus on accuracy and secure management, exactly what the market needs now to rebuild trust. Product, not sales: Large industry players are often not as concerned with revenue, customer base, and bottom line in immature companies as private investors are. They are (of course, somewhat dependent on the purpose of the M&A case) typically more interested in the product and how it complements or improves their existing portfolio, as well as the competence in the team they acquire, i.e., synergies. However, they are often unwilling to take significant product risk, so the evidence that the technology works and scales must be strong before anyone expresses concrete interest. This is about product, not sales, and is the core competence of the new CEO. And in a due diligence process, correct, clear books and good management systems (the new CFO's core competence) are valued more than visions and sales pitches. Share issues: The share issue rounds argue against them being in dialogue about an acquisition now, which in turn may indicate that ELABS is a ways off from having strong (enough) evidence of the technology's value and scalability. At the same time, M&A processes are often long. Both factors mean that the war chest had to be filled up. In addition, the cost base is being slimmed down, which is positive from an acquisition perspective because it reduces the buyer's PnL risk. The cost cut, however, could also be motivated by survival rather than acquisition. Disclaimer: I have been invested in ELABS before and sold at a loss. I still believe in the company both as a growth case and for acquisition, but right now it seems that the company is being prepared for acquisition. However, there will be no new entry from my side until the question of a repeat share issue is clarified…
- ·1 päivä sittenTranche 1 and 2 completed. What about the repair issue? When will this eventually be decided? It's been a while since the EGM now
- 3 päivää sitten3 päivää sittenI feel like we are good to go for some sideways development for quite some time.. I'm considering taking the 50% loss and move on·2 päivää sittenIt would be very nice if everyone could discuss Elab and not other companies here on the forum. I own shares in several places but I don't think I should start writing about them here.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 567 | - | - | ||
| 1 091 | - | - | ||
| 2 498 | - | - | ||
| 1 458 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt