2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
44 päivää sitten1 t 40 min
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
500
Myynti
Määrä
1 073
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 563 | - | - | ||
| 1 029 | - | - | ||
| 3 437 | - | - | ||
| 2 264 | - | - | ||
| 6 916 | - | - |
Ylin
7VWAP
Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
4 585 399
VWAP
Ylin
7Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
4 585 399
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 24.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 30.10. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 7.8. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 30.4. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 18.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 31.10.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenUgh! How boring this day turned out to be. Are these banks selling to themselves/each other? I wonder if Isaksen will have to give us a small stock exchange announcement next week, so we can go into the Christmas holiday with a good mood.·1 päivä sittenMmm...profit-taking..it's enough to look at the green numbers for my part. And buy, when there's extra money. But, I guess we are all needed. The long-term, short-term, traders, fortune hunters and these big banks....
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuMeta part 3: I see that several people are asking questions about how software and AI will interpret the surroundings in AR glasses. Now, it wasn't me who first brought up Meta's work on using software and AI to interpret the surroundings rather than more advanced sensors with OIS and AF. It was stated in the report that Myragubben shared, and there's no doubt that this is something they are working on. They write in the report for Aria that software and AI can be the future-oriented solution in AR glasses, rather than more advanced hardware with AF and OIS. Several newer reports from Meta confirm that this is a strategy they are continuing to work on. But we cannot know which technology they will end up with in the various future glasses. And there will be different needs for cameras and sensors intended for humans and AI. I see that several people write that it will require an enormous amount of data and processing power if AI is to interpret blurry data. First and foremost, one must distinguish between images intended for humans and images intended for machines. An image that looks poor and blurry to us can have better details and be more mathematically correct for machine interpretation. The most advanced AR platforms support 12 or more cameras/sensors. These can have different tasks and focal distances to capture the surroundings at short and long distances. Or cameras with OIS and AF. Furthermore, Meta is working on eye tracking. The software will know exactly where we are looking, what depth an object is at, and they will even see the difference between whether we are reading a text or looking at an object. When eye tracking registers that text is being read, the software or AI does not need to interpret the entire image. It only needs to interpret a few percent of the image with the specific text or object one is looking at. I also do not rule out that TLens will be seen in AI glasses. But it is probably not Meta/Luxottica glasses with volumes of several million units that will be launched first with TLens. The first consumer product that poLight will enter is unlikely to have that volume. Because that's not how they (OEMs) usually work.
·16 t sittenI think it's very good to have someone who asks critical questions and scrutinizes positively charged information. I haven't been on the forums so much that I've let myself be annoyed by the day after. So for me, until now, critical questions have been good. It is only when one cannot answer the critical questions that one must take another round with oneself.
·1 päivä sittenCan someone say very simple things about this company, for example 3 positive things and 3 negative things? And, do they make money, have they made money or when have they estimated to make money. Thanks in advance for proper and clear answers
·23 t sittenPositive: 1.Good management that cares about the shareholders! 2.Great technology that is very scalable and is only in the early stages of its evolution (TLens and Twedge, what else can this technology be used for?) 3.Features that distinguish the technology from others when it comes to particularly great advantages in certain markets (e.g. AR) Negative: 1. Takes time to develop a technology that established giants see risk in implementing 2. Dependent on additional funds as they do not yet have significant revenues (possibly one avoids further share issues and things work out) 3. More expensive than other technology They are slowly starting to get more frequent orders and possibly a breakthrough can be achieved by 2026-27 and one avoids a share issue ever again.
·2 päivää sittenWe can probably establish that if one of the big players chooses AF, then all the others will follow. They have no choice. THEN it will be chaos.·1 päivä sittenNo one can state anything for certain. Not even OEMs or poLight know which technology will be prevalent in the future. And there will be several solutions that will be used. There will be different display solutions and there will be a difference in cameras and sensors intended for AI and humans.
·22 t sitten · MuokattuI am writing this directly to you. (Dag N. Derpå) Not because you need my support, but I find the supposedly unpleasant accusations you are subjected to, in themselves, an interesting phenomenon. Briefly and imprecisely: What the ape flock does, is called in psychology PROJECTION: One transfers one's own unconscious values/thoughts that one does not want to acknowledge in oneself, onto another individual. It can also be called externalization of cognitive dissonance. It is human. Probably stems from our origin based on the instincts of an ape flock, where feeling like part of a flock is very important when the world is not as one would wish (all the time). Individuals who stand out are the easiest to attack. I note that you have two stars in your profile. Not many have that... HAPPY WEEKEND to both monkeys and all other herd animals... ;-)
·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuLook at the 5-year picture. Check all the peaks. Dec/Jan recurs in 2/3 of the cases. Not last year though.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
44 päivää sitten1 t 40 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenUgh! How boring this day turned out to be. Are these banks selling to themselves/each other? I wonder if Isaksen will have to give us a small stock exchange announcement next week, so we can go into the Christmas holiday with a good mood.·1 päivä sittenMmm...profit-taking..it's enough to look at the green numbers for my part. And buy, when there's extra money. But, I guess we are all needed. The long-term, short-term, traders, fortune hunters and these big banks....
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuMeta part 3: I see that several people are asking questions about how software and AI will interpret the surroundings in AR glasses. Now, it wasn't me who first brought up Meta's work on using software and AI to interpret the surroundings rather than more advanced sensors with OIS and AF. It was stated in the report that Myragubben shared, and there's no doubt that this is something they are working on. They write in the report for Aria that software and AI can be the future-oriented solution in AR glasses, rather than more advanced hardware with AF and OIS. Several newer reports from Meta confirm that this is a strategy they are continuing to work on. But we cannot know which technology they will end up with in the various future glasses. And there will be different needs for cameras and sensors intended for humans and AI. I see that several people write that it will require an enormous amount of data and processing power if AI is to interpret blurry data. First and foremost, one must distinguish between images intended for humans and images intended for machines. An image that looks poor and blurry to us can have better details and be more mathematically correct for machine interpretation. The most advanced AR platforms support 12 or more cameras/sensors. These can have different tasks and focal distances to capture the surroundings at short and long distances. Or cameras with OIS and AF. Furthermore, Meta is working on eye tracking. The software will know exactly where we are looking, what depth an object is at, and they will even see the difference between whether we are reading a text or looking at an object. When eye tracking registers that text is being read, the software or AI does not need to interpret the entire image. It only needs to interpret a few percent of the image with the specific text or object one is looking at. I also do not rule out that TLens will be seen in AI glasses. But it is probably not Meta/Luxottica glasses with volumes of several million units that will be launched first with TLens. The first consumer product that poLight will enter is unlikely to have that volume. Because that's not how they (OEMs) usually work.·16 t sittenI think it's very good to have someone who asks critical questions and scrutinizes positively charged information. I haven't been on the forums so much that I've let myself be annoyed by the day after. So for me, until now, critical questions have been good. It is only when one cannot answer the critical questions that one must take another round with oneself.
- ·1 päivä sittenCan someone say very simple things about this company, for example 3 positive things and 3 negative things? And, do they make money, have they made money or when have they estimated to make money. Thanks in advance for proper and clear answers·23 t sittenPositive: 1.Good management that cares about the shareholders! 2.Great technology that is very scalable and is only in the early stages of its evolution (TLens and Twedge, what else can this technology be used for?) 3.Features that distinguish the technology from others when it comes to particularly great advantages in certain markets (e.g. AR) Negative: 1. Takes time to develop a technology that established giants see risk in implementing 2. Dependent on additional funds as they do not yet have significant revenues (possibly one avoids further share issues and things work out) 3. More expensive than other technology They are slowly starting to get more frequent orders and possibly a breakthrough can be achieved by 2026-27 and one avoids a share issue ever again.
- ·2 päivää sittenWe can probably establish that if one of the big players chooses AF, then all the others will follow. They have no choice. THEN it will be chaos.·1 päivä sittenNo one can state anything for certain. Not even OEMs or poLight know which technology will be prevalent in the future. And there will be several solutions that will be used. There will be different display solutions and there will be a difference in cameras and sensors intended for AI and humans.·22 t sitten · MuokattuI am writing this directly to you. (Dag N. Derpå) Not because you need my support, but I find the supposedly unpleasant accusations you are subjected to, in themselves, an interesting phenomenon. Briefly and imprecisely: What the ape flock does, is called in psychology PROJECTION: One transfers one's own unconscious values/thoughts that one does not want to acknowledge in oneself, onto another individual. It can also be called externalization of cognitive dissonance. It is human. Probably stems from our origin based on the instincts of an ape flock, where feeling like part of a flock is very important when the world is not as one would wish (all the time). Individuals who stand out are the easiest to attack. I note that you have two stars in your profile. Not many have that... HAPPY WEEKEND to both monkeys and all other herd animals... ;-)
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuLook at the 5-year picture. Check all the peaks. Dec/Jan recurs in 2/3 of the cases. Not last year though.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
500
Myynti
Määrä
1 073
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 563 | - | - | ||
| 1 029 | - | - | ||
| 3 437 | - | - | ||
| 2 264 | - | - | ||
| 6 916 | - | - |
Ylin
7VWAP
Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
4 585 399
VWAP
Ylin
7Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
4 585 399
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 24.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 30.10. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 7.8. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 30.4. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 18.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 31.10.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
44 päivää sitten1 t 40 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 24.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 30.10. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 7.8. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 30.4. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 18.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 31.10.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenUgh! How boring this day turned out to be. Are these banks selling to themselves/each other? I wonder if Isaksen will have to give us a small stock exchange announcement next week, so we can go into the Christmas holiday with a good mood.·1 päivä sittenMmm...profit-taking..it's enough to look at the green numbers for my part. And buy, when there's extra money. But, I guess we are all needed. The long-term, short-term, traders, fortune hunters and these big banks....
- ·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuMeta part 3: I see that several people are asking questions about how software and AI will interpret the surroundings in AR glasses. Now, it wasn't me who first brought up Meta's work on using software and AI to interpret the surroundings rather than more advanced sensors with OIS and AF. It was stated in the report that Myragubben shared, and there's no doubt that this is something they are working on. They write in the report for Aria that software and AI can be the future-oriented solution in AR glasses, rather than more advanced hardware with AF and OIS. Several newer reports from Meta confirm that this is a strategy they are continuing to work on. But we cannot know which technology they will end up with in the various future glasses. And there will be different needs for cameras and sensors intended for humans and AI. I see that several people write that it will require an enormous amount of data and processing power if AI is to interpret blurry data. First and foremost, one must distinguish between images intended for humans and images intended for machines. An image that looks poor and blurry to us can have better details and be more mathematically correct for machine interpretation. The most advanced AR platforms support 12 or more cameras/sensors. These can have different tasks and focal distances to capture the surroundings at short and long distances. Or cameras with OIS and AF. Furthermore, Meta is working on eye tracking. The software will know exactly where we are looking, what depth an object is at, and they will even see the difference between whether we are reading a text or looking at an object. When eye tracking registers that text is being read, the software or AI does not need to interpret the entire image. It only needs to interpret a few percent of the image with the specific text or object one is looking at. I also do not rule out that TLens will be seen in AI glasses. But it is probably not Meta/Luxottica glasses with volumes of several million units that will be launched first with TLens. The first consumer product that poLight will enter is unlikely to have that volume. Because that's not how they (OEMs) usually work.·16 t sittenI think it's very good to have someone who asks critical questions and scrutinizes positively charged information. I haven't been on the forums so much that I've let myself be annoyed by the day after. So for me, until now, critical questions have been good. It is only when one cannot answer the critical questions that one must take another round with oneself.
- ·1 päivä sittenCan someone say very simple things about this company, for example 3 positive things and 3 negative things? And, do they make money, have they made money or when have they estimated to make money. Thanks in advance for proper and clear answers·23 t sittenPositive: 1.Good management that cares about the shareholders! 2.Great technology that is very scalable and is only in the early stages of its evolution (TLens and Twedge, what else can this technology be used for?) 3.Features that distinguish the technology from others when it comes to particularly great advantages in certain markets (e.g. AR) Negative: 1. Takes time to develop a technology that established giants see risk in implementing 2. Dependent on additional funds as they do not yet have significant revenues (possibly one avoids further share issues and things work out) 3. More expensive than other technology They are slowly starting to get more frequent orders and possibly a breakthrough can be achieved by 2026-27 and one avoids a share issue ever again.
- ·2 päivää sittenWe can probably establish that if one of the big players chooses AF, then all the others will follow. They have no choice. THEN it will be chaos.·1 päivä sittenNo one can state anything for certain. Not even OEMs or poLight know which technology will be prevalent in the future. And there will be several solutions that will be used. There will be different display solutions and there will be a difference in cameras and sensors intended for AI and humans.·22 t sitten · MuokattuI am writing this directly to you. (Dag N. Derpå) Not because you need my support, but I find the supposedly unpleasant accusations you are subjected to, in themselves, an interesting phenomenon. Briefly and imprecisely: What the ape flock does, is called in psychology PROJECTION: One transfers one's own unconscious values/thoughts that one does not want to acknowledge in oneself, onto another individual. It can also be called externalization of cognitive dissonance. It is human. Probably stems from our origin based on the instincts of an ape flock, where feeling like part of a flock is very important when the world is not as one would wish (all the time). Individuals who stand out are the easiest to attack. I note that you have two stars in your profile. Not many have that... HAPPY WEEKEND to both monkeys and all other herd animals... ;-)
- ·2 päivää sitten · MuokattuLook at the 5-year picture. Check all the peaks. Dec/Jan recurs in 2/3 of the cases. Not last year though.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
500
Myynti
Määrä
1 073
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 563 | - | - | ||
| 1 029 | - | - | ||
| 3 437 | - | - | ||
| 2 264 | - | - | ||
| 6 916 | - | - |
Ylin
7VWAP
Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
4 585 399
VWAP
Ylin
7Alin
6,63VaihtoMäärä
4 585 399
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt