2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
84 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 773 | - | - | ||
| 561 | - | - | ||
| 682 | - | - | ||
| 687 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 31.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·12 t sitten · MuokattuThomas Stenhjem You can insert a link into ChatGPT and ask it to summarize: The article from the newspaper Grenda is about politicians from Nordic Mining likely being invited to a meeting in the municipal council to present their plans for a quartz project at Lyngstrand in Kvinnherad municipality.  Here is a comprehensive summary: Background Nordic Mining is working on plans to develop a large-scale quartz extraction at Lyngstrand in Kvinnherad. Quartz is used, among other things, in: * solar panels * electronics and semiconductors * industrial glass * battery and technology products The company now wishes to strengthen its commitment and has established its own project team for the work. They aim to start further processes with drilling and permit applications during 2026.  What the municipal council wants It has been proposed that the municipal council should receive a thorough presentation directly from Nordic Mining. The goal is: * to give politicians better insight into the project * to inform residents about the plans * to open for questions and discussion regarding the consequences The article suggests that this will be a more comprehensive briefing than before, and that both local politicians and the public will get to hear what the project actually entails.  Historical context The article refers to Nordic Mining having previously been in contact with the municipality about the project. It is mentioned, among other things, that the then development manager visited the municipal council as early as 2013. This means that the plans have existed for a long time, but that they now seem to be gaining new momentum.  Why the project is important The project could be of great importance to the region: * potential jobs * increased industrial activity * economic ripple effects At the same time, there could be debate about: * impact on nature * environmental impact * transport and infrastructure * noise and landscape changes These are typical questions that often arise around mining and mineral projects in Norway. What seems to be the situation now As of now, it seems that: * the project is still in the planning and investigation phase * the municipality wants more information before further processing * Nordic Mining is trying to build local understanding and support It is not mentioned that the project has been finally approved yet. Underlying tension in the matter Although the article is relatively sober, there is a clear undertone that this could become an important and perhaps controversial local issue: * some will see great opportunities for jobs and value creation * others will be concerned about nature and the local environment Since quartz is important in modern technology and green industry, the project can also be linked to Norway's role in future raw material production.
·12 t sitten · MuokattuSeems like we are around 12kr, which is the issue price, and waiting to see if we will break upwards or downwards..on very low turnover
·14 t sittenI note that NOM prevailed in the Supreme Court in the case concerning the temporary halt of the deposition last week. I therefore wonder what practical significance this decision has going forward. Have the environmental organizations now exhausted their possibility to demand a temporary halt through the court, or can they file a new claim if the outcome for the state now becomes negative? In other words: How significant is the Supreme Court's decision for the further process? Can there still be new petitions for immediate halt and a new round in the legal system, or does this decision in practice put a stop to it? I am interested in hearing how others here assess the situation and what legal possibilities, if any, are still open going forward.
·12 t sittenWhat no one has an answer to is what the consequences will be if the decision from 2015 is declared invalid. Is it enough to write a new decision with correct justification? So, whether the entire process is simply a waste of society's resources and nitpicking.·11 t sittenNo, it must be justified! And if the ministry starts from scratch, it can take time, but much indicates that the authorities have a bit more understanding and knowledge for preparedness and critical minerals (cf. Fensfeltet) where the state has taken over the zoning plan work. For those who remember the Fosen case, the operation was not stopped, but the state was obliged to rectify the unlawful situation and it took time.
·15 t sittenSupreme Court Justices buying, or? 😂·14 t sittenMost have probably understood that regardless of the outcome in the verdict, the mine will never be stopped. It's just a formality as critical minerals that will then come in the next permit... Simple and straightforward.
·12 t sittenA "formality" that must be justified with a thorough analysis and consultation rounds ref. p 32-33 in the judgment. Simply put, it will probably only take a couple of years.- ·1 päivä sittenHas a spy who is present during the trial. First day and that person believes that the State is quite convincing and has a good case. Would have liked to be there myself but is currently in Spain.
·12 t sittenGekkgekk probably doesn't mean dispensation from the supreme court.. but dispensation from the state.. but relax, the state probably has control here, it will work out. 🍾🙌·12 t sittenOn what grounds will the state authorize an exemption if the Supreme Court finds that the permits are invalid?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
84 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·12 t sitten · MuokattuThomas Stenhjem You can insert a link into ChatGPT and ask it to summarize: The article from the newspaper Grenda is about politicians from Nordic Mining likely being invited to a meeting in the municipal council to present their plans for a quartz project at Lyngstrand in Kvinnherad municipality.  Here is a comprehensive summary: Background Nordic Mining is working on plans to develop a large-scale quartz extraction at Lyngstrand in Kvinnherad. Quartz is used, among other things, in: * solar panels * electronics and semiconductors * industrial glass * battery and technology products The company now wishes to strengthen its commitment and has established its own project team for the work. They aim to start further processes with drilling and permit applications during 2026.  What the municipal council wants It has been proposed that the municipal council should receive a thorough presentation directly from Nordic Mining. The goal is: * to give politicians better insight into the project * to inform residents about the plans * to open for questions and discussion regarding the consequences The article suggests that this will be a more comprehensive briefing than before, and that both local politicians and the public will get to hear what the project actually entails.  Historical context The article refers to Nordic Mining having previously been in contact with the municipality about the project. It is mentioned, among other things, that the then development manager visited the municipal council as early as 2013. This means that the plans have existed for a long time, but that they now seem to be gaining new momentum.  Why the project is important The project could be of great importance to the region: * potential jobs * increased industrial activity * economic ripple effects At the same time, there could be debate about: * impact on nature * environmental impact * transport and infrastructure * noise and landscape changes These are typical questions that often arise around mining and mineral projects in Norway. What seems to be the situation now As of now, it seems that: * the project is still in the planning and investigation phase * the municipality wants more information before further processing * Nordic Mining is trying to build local understanding and support It is not mentioned that the project has been finally approved yet. Underlying tension in the matter Although the article is relatively sober, there is a clear undertone that this could become an important and perhaps controversial local issue: * some will see great opportunities for jobs and value creation * others will be concerned about nature and the local environment Since quartz is important in modern technology and green industry, the project can also be linked to Norway's role in future raw material production.
- ·12 t sitten · MuokattuSeems like we are around 12kr, which is the issue price, and waiting to see if we will break upwards or downwards..on very low turnover
- ·14 t sittenI note that NOM prevailed in the Supreme Court in the case concerning the temporary halt of the deposition last week. I therefore wonder what practical significance this decision has going forward. Have the environmental organizations now exhausted their possibility to demand a temporary halt through the court, or can they file a new claim if the outcome for the state now becomes negative? In other words: How significant is the Supreme Court's decision for the further process? Can there still be new petitions for immediate halt and a new round in the legal system, or does this decision in practice put a stop to it? I am interested in hearing how others here assess the situation and what legal possibilities, if any, are still open going forward.·12 t sittenWhat no one has an answer to is what the consequences will be if the decision from 2015 is declared invalid. Is it enough to write a new decision with correct justification? So, whether the entire process is simply a waste of society's resources and nitpicking.·11 t sittenNo, it must be justified! And if the ministry starts from scratch, it can take time, but much indicates that the authorities have a bit more understanding and knowledge for preparedness and critical minerals (cf. Fensfeltet) where the state has taken over the zoning plan work. For those who remember the Fosen case, the operation was not stopped, but the state was obliged to rectify the unlawful situation and it took time.
- ·15 t sittenSupreme Court Justices buying, or? 😂·14 t sittenMost have probably understood that regardless of the outcome in the verdict, the mine will never be stopped. It's just a formality as critical minerals that will then come in the next permit... Simple and straightforward.·12 t sittenA "formality" that must be justified with a thorough analysis and consultation rounds ref. p 32-33 in the judgment. Simply put, it will probably only take a couple of years.
- ·1 päivä sittenHas a spy who is present during the trial. First day and that person believes that the State is quite convincing and has a good case. Would have liked to be there myself but is currently in Spain.·12 t sittenGekkgekk probably doesn't mean dispensation from the supreme court.. but dispensation from the state.. but relax, the state probably has control here, it will work out. 🍾🙌·12 t sittenOn what grounds will the state authorize an exemption if the Supreme Court finds that the permits are invalid?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 773 | - | - | ||
| 561 | - | - | ||
| 682 | - | - | ||
| 687 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 31.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
84 päivää sitten
‧36 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 12.5. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 4.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 31.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 11.2.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·12 t sitten · MuokattuThomas Stenhjem You can insert a link into ChatGPT and ask it to summarize: The article from the newspaper Grenda is about politicians from Nordic Mining likely being invited to a meeting in the municipal council to present their plans for a quartz project at Lyngstrand in Kvinnherad municipality.  Here is a comprehensive summary: Background Nordic Mining is working on plans to develop a large-scale quartz extraction at Lyngstrand in Kvinnherad. Quartz is used, among other things, in: * solar panels * electronics and semiconductors * industrial glass * battery and technology products The company now wishes to strengthen its commitment and has established its own project team for the work. They aim to start further processes with drilling and permit applications during 2026.  What the municipal council wants It has been proposed that the municipal council should receive a thorough presentation directly from Nordic Mining. The goal is: * to give politicians better insight into the project * to inform residents about the plans * to open for questions and discussion regarding the consequences The article suggests that this will be a more comprehensive briefing than before, and that both local politicians and the public will get to hear what the project actually entails.  Historical context The article refers to Nordic Mining having previously been in contact with the municipality about the project. It is mentioned, among other things, that the then development manager visited the municipal council as early as 2013. This means that the plans have existed for a long time, but that they now seem to be gaining new momentum.  Why the project is important The project could be of great importance to the region: * potential jobs * increased industrial activity * economic ripple effects At the same time, there could be debate about: * impact on nature * environmental impact * transport and infrastructure * noise and landscape changes These are typical questions that often arise around mining and mineral projects in Norway. What seems to be the situation now As of now, it seems that: * the project is still in the planning and investigation phase * the municipality wants more information before further processing * Nordic Mining is trying to build local understanding and support It is not mentioned that the project has been finally approved yet. Underlying tension in the matter Although the article is relatively sober, there is a clear undertone that this could become an important and perhaps controversial local issue: * some will see great opportunities for jobs and value creation * others will be concerned about nature and the local environment Since quartz is important in modern technology and green industry, the project can also be linked to Norway's role in future raw material production.
- ·12 t sitten · MuokattuSeems like we are around 12kr, which is the issue price, and waiting to see if we will break upwards or downwards..on very low turnover
- ·14 t sittenI note that NOM prevailed in the Supreme Court in the case concerning the temporary halt of the deposition last week. I therefore wonder what practical significance this decision has going forward. Have the environmental organizations now exhausted their possibility to demand a temporary halt through the court, or can they file a new claim if the outcome for the state now becomes negative? In other words: How significant is the Supreme Court's decision for the further process? Can there still be new petitions for immediate halt and a new round in the legal system, or does this decision in practice put a stop to it? I am interested in hearing how others here assess the situation and what legal possibilities, if any, are still open going forward.·12 t sittenWhat no one has an answer to is what the consequences will be if the decision from 2015 is declared invalid. Is it enough to write a new decision with correct justification? So, whether the entire process is simply a waste of society's resources and nitpicking.·11 t sittenNo, it must be justified! And if the ministry starts from scratch, it can take time, but much indicates that the authorities have a bit more understanding and knowledge for preparedness and critical minerals (cf. Fensfeltet) where the state has taken over the zoning plan work. For those who remember the Fosen case, the operation was not stopped, but the state was obliged to rectify the unlawful situation and it took time.
- ·15 t sittenSupreme Court Justices buying, or? 😂·14 t sittenMost have probably understood that regardless of the outcome in the verdict, the mine will never be stopped. It's just a formality as critical minerals that will then come in the next permit... Simple and straightforward.·12 t sittenA "formality" that must be justified with a thorough analysis and consultation rounds ref. p 32-33 in the judgment. Simply put, it will probably only take a couple of years.
- ·1 päivä sittenHas a spy who is present during the trial. First day and that person believes that the State is quite convincing and has a good case. Would have liked to be there myself but is currently in Spain.·12 t sittenGekkgekk probably doesn't mean dispensation from the supreme court.. but dispensation from the state.. but relax, the state probably has control here, it will work out. 🍾🙌·12 t sittenOn what grounds will the state authorize an exemption if the Supreme Court finds that the permits are invalid?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 773 | - | - | ||
| 561 | - | - | ||
| 682 | - | - | ||
| 687 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt