Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.

Rheinmetall

Rheinmetall

1 830,00EUR
+2,21% (+39,50)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin1 844,00
Alin1 750,00
Vaihto
471,7 MEUR
1 830,00EUR
+2,21% (+39,50)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin1 844,00
Alin1 750,00
Vaihto
471,7 MEUR

Rheinmetall

Rheinmetall

1 830,00EUR
+2,21% (+39,50)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin1 844,00
Alin1 750,00
Vaihto
471,7 MEUR
1 830,00EUR
+2,21% (+39,50)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin1 844,00
Alin1 750,00
Vaihto
471,7 MEUR

Rheinmetall

Rheinmetall

1 830,00EUR
+2,21% (+39,50)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin1 844,00
Alin1 750,00
Vaihto
471,7 MEUR
1 830,00EUR
+2,21% (+39,50)
Päätöskurssi
Ylin1 844,00
Alin1 750,00
Vaihto
471,7 MEUR
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
79 päivää sitten1 t 10 min
8,10 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,45%Tuotto/v

Tarjoustasot

GermanyXetra
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----
Ylin
1 844
VWAP
1 814
Alin
1 750
VaihtoMäärä
471,7 260 029
VWAP
1 814
Ylin
1 844
Alin
1 750
VaihtoMäärä
471,7 260 029

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
11.3.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti6.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti8.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti12.3.2025
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti7.11.2024

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 9 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    9 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    I believe Anders Puck Nielsen is right in his recent analysis, where he argues that it only makes sense for the USA to want to own Greenland if they are preparing for a future without Europe and Nato as alliance partners. So just the fact that the USA has pushed so hard for Greenland is a bad sign for Nato's future => Incitement for Europe to invest more in defense Another excellent analysis from Anders, by the way, which deserves to be seen in its entirety: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwRsTDlqU8I
  • 15 t sitten
    ·
    15 t sitten
    ·
    Can anyone explain why it's rising today? I was convinced we would see a sharp decline, now that Ukraine and Russia are meeting today?
    11 t sitten
    ·
    11 t sitten
    ·
    My thought is that it rose because there was a selloff yesterday due to TACO-Grønland, and the market does not believe that these peace talks about Ukraine lead anywhere. But at the same time, in my head, this rise is "air". Because people think it's a discount, without thinking that the previous rise came due to escalated Greenland rhetoric from Trump, so it has been de-escalated. If that made sense.
    6 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    6 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Now you must also keep in mind that this is how Trump negotiates, he wrote it himself in his own book. Go hard to get something between what one wants and already has, ish. The escalation, and then the softening of the rhetoric was lovely for those who trade both long and short. The fact that the sell-off didn't take the stock price back to approximately the level it had on this news tells me that the gap there is air.
  • 19 t sitten
    19 t sitten
    Tämä julkaisu on poistettu.
    19 t sitten
    ·
    19 t sitten
    ·
    What are you talking about?
    19 t sitten
    ·
    19 t sitten
    ·
    Sorry, I must have read/interpreted a piece of news incorrectly late last night. Was totally tired. But it is now a fact that Putin's army and war chest are shrinking.
  • 20 t sitten
    ·
    20 t sitten
    ·
    10 t sitten
    ·
    10 t sitten
    ·
    I asked ChatGPT to look into it a bit from a Rheinmetall perspective: What EU/NATO can realistically invest in around Greenland – and where Rheinmetall can participate: 1. Icebreakers / arctic specialized vessels EU/NATO interest: High (logistics, access, sovereignty) Rheinmetall: No Comment: Rheinmetall does not build ships or icebreakers. This is specialized civil/military shipbuilding (Finland, Canada, etc.). 2. Arctic patrol vessels EU/NATO interest: High Rheinmetall: Indirectly Comment: Not hulls or propulsion, but can supply sensors, weapon systems, ammunition and integration. 3. Frigates (F126 / F127) EU/NATO interest: National (e.g. Germany), not a direct EU project Rheinmetall: Indirectly Comment: Rheinmetall does not build frigates, but can supply naval guns, ammunition, sensors and parts of the combat system. 4. Land-based surveillance radar EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Radar and sensor systems, air and maritime surveillance, sensor fusion. 5. Maritime surveillance (sensors, EO/IR) EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Ship radar, electro-optical sensors, surveillance systems. 6. Air surveillance / ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: C4ISR systems, data fusion, command & control solutions. 7. Drones (UAV) for the Arctic EU/NATO interest: High Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: UAV platforms, sensors, mission systems, integration into existing networks. 8. Anti-drone systems (C-UAS) EU/NATO interest: Increasing Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Skyranger, Oerlikon-based C-UAS solutions, radar + effector. 9. Air defense (short to medium range) EU/NATO interest: Relevant Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Skyranger, Oerlikon cannons, missile integration, base protection. 10. Mobile land platforms (arctic logistics / bases) EU/NATO interest: Relevant Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Boxer (arctic configurations), support and logistics vehicles. 11. Mobile command centers (C2/C4) EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Mobile operations centers, battlefield management systems. 12. Secure military communication EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Encrypted communication, network and system integration. 13. Ammunition (land and naval, arctic use) EU/NATO interest: High Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Naval ammunition, artillery, cold-weather qualified ammo. 14. Training and simulation EU/NATO interest: Relevant Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Simulation systems, training environments for arctic operations. 15. Dog sleds 😉 EU/NATO interest: Critical (in memes) Rheinmetall: No
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
79 päivää sitten1 t 10 min
8,10 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,45%Tuotto/v

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 9 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    9 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    I believe Anders Puck Nielsen is right in his recent analysis, where he argues that it only makes sense for the USA to want to own Greenland if they are preparing for a future without Europe and Nato as alliance partners. So just the fact that the USA has pushed so hard for Greenland is a bad sign for Nato's future => Incitement for Europe to invest more in defense Another excellent analysis from Anders, by the way, which deserves to be seen in its entirety: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwRsTDlqU8I
  • 15 t sitten
    ·
    15 t sitten
    ·
    Can anyone explain why it's rising today? I was convinced we would see a sharp decline, now that Ukraine and Russia are meeting today?
    11 t sitten
    ·
    11 t sitten
    ·
    My thought is that it rose because there was a selloff yesterday due to TACO-Grønland, and the market does not believe that these peace talks about Ukraine lead anywhere. But at the same time, in my head, this rise is "air". Because people think it's a discount, without thinking that the previous rise came due to escalated Greenland rhetoric from Trump, so it has been de-escalated. If that made sense.
    6 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    6 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Now you must also keep in mind that this is how Trump negotiates, he wrote it himself in his own book. Go hard to get something between what one wants and already has, ish. The escalation, and then the softening of the rhetoric was lovely for those who trade both long and short. The fact that the sell-off didn't take the stock price back to approximately the level it had on this news tells me that the gap there is air.
  • 19 t sitten
    19 t sitten
    Tämä julkaisu on poistettu.
    19 t sitten
    ·
    19 t sitten
    ·
    What are you talking about?
    19 t sitten
    ·
    19 t sitten
    ·
    Sorry, I must have read/interpreted a piece of news incorrectly late last night. Was totally tired. But it is now a fact that Putin's army and war chest are shrinking.
  • 20 t sitten
    ·
    20 t sitten
    ·
    10 t sitten
    ·
    10 t sitten
    ·
    I asked ChatGPT to look into it a bit from a Rheinmetall perspective: What EU/NATO can realistically invest in around Greenland – and where Rheinmetall can participate: 1. Icebreakers / arctic specialized vessels EU/NATO interest: High (logistics, access, sovereignty) Rheinmetall: No Comment: Rheinmetall does not build ships or icebreakers. This is specialized civil/military shipbuilding (Finland, Canada, etc.). 2. Arctic patrol vessels EU/NATO interest: High Rheinmetall: Indirectly Comment: Not hulls or propulsion, but can supply sensors, weapon systems, ammunition and integration. 3. Frigates (F126 / F127) EU/NATO interest: National (e.g. Germany), not a direct EU project Rheinmetall: Indirectly Comment: Rheinmetall does not build frigates, but can supply naval guns, ammunition, sensors and parts of the combat system. 4. Land-based surveillance radar EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Radar and sensor systems, air and maritime surveillance, sensor fusion. 5. Maritime surveillance (sensors, EO/IR) EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Ship radar, electro-optical sensors, surveillance systems. 6. Air surveillance / ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: C4ISR systems, data fusion, command & control solutions. 7. Drones (UAV) for the Arctic EU/NATO interest: High Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: UAV platforms, sensors, mission systems, integration into existing networks. 8. Anti-drone systems (C-UAS) EU/NATO interest: Increasing Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Skyranger, Oerlikon-based C-UAS solutions, radar + effector. 9. Air defense (short to medium range) EU/NATO interest: Relevant Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Skyranger, Oerlikon cannons, missile integration, base protection. 10. Mobile land platforms (arctic logistics / bases) EU/NATO interest: Relevant Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Boxer (arctic configurations), support and logistics vehicles. 11. Mobile command centers (C2/C4) EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Mobile operations centers, battlefield management systems. 12. Secure military communication EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Encrypted communication, network and system integration. 13. Ammunition (land and naval, arctic use) EU/NATO interest: High Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Naval ammunition, artillery, cold-weather qualified ammo. 14. Training and simulation EU/NATO interest: Relevant Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Simulation systems, training environments for arctic operations. 15. Dog sleds 😉 EU/NATO interest: Critical (in memes) Rheinmetall: No
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

GermanyXetra
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----
Ylin
1 844
VWAP
1 814
Alin
1 750
VaihtoMäärä
471,7 260 029
VWAP
1 814
Ylin
1 844
Alin
1 750
VaihtoMäärä
471,7 260 029

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
11.3.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti6.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti8.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti12.3.2025
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti7.11.2024

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
79 päivää sitten1 t 10 min

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
11.3.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti6.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti7.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti8.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti12.3.2025
2024 Q3 -tulosraportti7.11.2024

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

8,10 EUR/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,45%Tuotto/v

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 9 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    9 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    I believe Anders Puck Nielsen is right in his recent analysis, where he argues that it only makes sense for the USA to want to own Greenland if they are preparing for a future without Europe and Nato as alliance partners. So just the fact that the USA has pushed so hard for Greenland is a bad sign for Nato's future => Incitement for Europe to invest more in defense Another excellent analysis from Anders, by the way, which deserves to be seen in its entirety: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwRsTDlqU8I
  • 15 t sitten
    ·
    15 t sitten
    ·
    Can anyone explain why it's rising today? I was convinced we would see a sharp decline, now that Ukraine and Russia are meeting today?
    11 t sitten
    ·
    11 t sitten
    ·
    My thought is that it rose because there was a selloff yesterday due to TACO-Grønland, and the market does not believe that these peace talks about Ukraine lead anywhere. But at the same time, in my head, this rise is "air". Because people think it's a discount, without thinking that the previous rise came due to escalated Greenland rhetoric from Trump, so it has been de-escalated. If that made sense.
    6 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    6 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Now you must also keep in mind that this is how Trump negotiates, he wrote it himself in his own book. Go hard to get something between what one wants and already has, ish. The escalation, and then the softening of the rhetoric was lovely for those who trade both long and short. The fact that the sell-off didn't take the stock price back to approximately the level it had on this news tells me that the gap there is air.
  • 19 t sitten
    19 t sitten
    Tämä julkaisu on poistettu.
    19 t sitten
    ·
    19 t sitten
    ·
    What are you talking about?
    19 t sitten
    ·
    19 t sitten
    ·
    Sorry, I must have read/interpreted a piece of news incorrectly late last night. Was totally tired. But it is now a fact that Putin's army and war chest are shrinking.
  • 20 t sitten
    ·
    20 t sitten
    ·
    10 t sitten
    ·
    10 t sitten
    ·
    I asked ChatGPT to look into it a bit from a Rheinmetall perspective: What EU/NATO can realistically invest in around Greenland – and where Rheinmetall can participate: 1. Icebreakers / arctic specialized vessels EU/NATO interest: High (logistics, access, sovereignty) Rheinmetall: No Comment: Rheinmetall does not build ships or icebreakers. This is specialized civil/military shipbuilding (Finland, Canada, etc.). 2. Arctic patrol vessels EU/NATO interest: High Rheinmetall: Indirectly Comment: Not hulls or propulsion, but can supply sensors, weapon systems, ammunition and integration. 3. Frigates (F126 / F127) EU/NATO interest: National (e.g. Germany), not a direct EU project Rheinmetall: Indirectly Comment: Rheinmetall does not build frigates, but can supply naval guns, ammunition, sensors and parts of the combat system. 4. Land-based surveillance radar EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Radar and sensor systems, air and maritime surveillance, sensor fusion. 5. Maritime surveillance (sensors, EO/IR) EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Ship radar, electro-optical sensors, surveillance systems. 6. Air surveillance / ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: C4ISR systems, data fusion, command & control solutions. 7. Drones (UAV) for the Arctic EU/NATO interest: High Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: UAV platforms, sensors, mission systems, integration into existing networks. 8. Anti-drone systems (C-UAS) EU/NATO interest: Increasing Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Skyranger, Oerlikon-based C-UAS solutions, radar + effector. 9. Air defense (short to medium range) EU/NATO interest: Relevant Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Skyranger, Oerlikon cannons, missile integration, base protection. 10. Mobile land platforms (arctic logistics / bases) EU/NATO interest: Relevant Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Boxer (arctic configurations), support and logistics vehicles. 11. Mobile command centers (C2/C4) EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Mobile operations centers, battlefield management systems. 12. Secure military communication EU/NATO interest: Very high Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Encrypted communication, network and system integration. 13. Ammunition (land and naval, arctic use) EU/NATO interest: High Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Naval ammunition, artillery, cold-weather qualified ammo. 14. Training and simulation EU/NATO interest: Relevant Rheinmetall: Yes Examples: Simulation systems, training environments for arctic operations. 15. Dog sleds 😉 EU/NATO interest: Critical (in memes) Rheinmetall: No
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

GermanyXetra
Määrä
Osto
0
Myynti
Määrä
0

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
----
Ylin
1 844
VWAP
1 814
Alin
1 750
VaihtoMäärä
471,7 260 029
VWAP
1 814
Ylin
1 844
Alin
1 750
VaihtoMäärä
471,7 260 029

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt