2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
62 päivää sitten
Tarjoustasot
Nordic Growth Market
Määrä
Osto
105 913
Myynti
Määrä
49 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 565 | AVA | SWB | ||
| 16 435 | ENS | SWB | ||
| 565 | ENS | SWB | ||
| 19 | AVA | SHB | ||
| 503 | AVA | SHB |
Ylin
0,083VWAP
Alin
0,076VaihtoMäärä
0,1 646 530
VWAP
Ylin
0,083Alin
0,076VaihtoMäärä
0,1 646 530
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q4 -tulosraportti | 20.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 25.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 9.5.2025 | |
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 14.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 14.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·2 päivää sittenWell, what do you think? Personally, I've lost all confidence, especially in myself as a stock investor🤔
·1 päivä sittenI did not agree to the last one and I don't feel particularly keen now either to put more money into a big black hole. The management is doing a terrible job when it comes to information, both regarding ongoing matters and in anticipation of these requests for even more money. They must, for crying out loud, explain where they see a market that will make the company grow and not just survive to cover employees' salaries and other costs. The question is crystal clear, will these contributions generate a large and sustainable revenue stream !? Otherwise, they can look to the stars for more money from us, I also have a faint uneasy feeling that there are people slowly but surely acquiring further majority in the company to then corner the shares and delist the company, and then they will have gotten all the years from us and still have the company. The big question is, as before..... What added value will the contribution create for us shareholders !?
·2.1. · MuokattuIndependent scouting - various sources: Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) appears to be heading towards a two-part future: (1) rapid and broad industrialized growth in “replication-first” areas (photonics/metasurfaces/AR optics, LED/PV, micro-optics), and (2) a more uncertain but seriously pursued path towards selected semiconductor steps where cost/energy/simple process flows can break through – if defectivity, overlay, and the template ecosystem reach “mass production in practice”. Where NIL stands right now NIL has matured significantly and is often highlighted as particularly attractive where one wants to copy the same nanostructure over and over again across large areas (e.g., diffractive optics, waveguides, metasurfaces). In advanced chip lithography, the most noted commercial venture is Canon's NIL platform (FPA-1200NZ2C), which Canon itself promotes as a more energy-efficient and potentially cheaper path than EUV in certain flows. What drives NIL forward (why interest is increasing) Cost and energy: Canon has explicitly marketed NIL as having significantly lower energy requirements and simpler process steps compared to EUV in their narrative. Photonics/AR and large areas: Roll-to-plate/rolling NIL is highlighted as an enabler for scalable manufacturing of AR waveguides/diffractive elements and related micro-optics. Template innovation: Things are happening around templates (stamps) and their resolution/production, which is central for NIL to scale to “real” volume. The biggest obstacles (what determines if NIL becomes “mainstream” in chips) In chip production, these are the classic “make-or-break” points: Defects/particles (contact process → sensitive to contamination) and yield issues. Overlay/alignment (placing many layers exactly on top of each other) and mechanical deformations/wafer-distortion in contact steps. Template lifespan, cost, and supply chain (manufacturing, inspection, cleaning, replacement). Probable development 2026–2030 1) Strongest and most probable growth: photonics & nano-optics Here, NIL's “copying strength” fits perfectly: the same grating/metasurface/waveguide structure can be replicated with high precision and good unit cost once the process is established. 2) Semiconductors: more selectively – first where NIL provides clear ROI Rather than “replacing EUV outright,” it is more realistic that NIL takes niches or specific layers (e.g., patterns that are well suited for imprint, or where cost/energy/tool flow dominate). Canon also positions NIL as an EUV alternative for cost/energy, but the industry is still in a phase where proof in HVM (high-volume manufacturing) is what counts. 3) EUV will not be “idle” – and that affects NIL's window EUV (incl. High-NA) continues to be driven forward despite very high tool costs, which means NIL must win where EUV becomes too expensive/energy-intensive or where NIL offers fewer process steps with acceptable yield. What I would keep an eye on (signal intelligence) Independent HVM results: not just press releases – but yield/defectivity/overlay data over time. Template ecosystem: delivery capacity, inspection, cleaning, lifespan, and cost per wafer. Breakthroughs in AR/metasurfaces: if AR waveguides/metasurfaces scale in volume, NIL could become “default” for that entire optics class.- ·18.12.2025I'm probably the only one left holding the bag because no one is answering. That was indeed unfortunate..... Any thoughts out there?
·19.12.2025On the contrary! Most are probably left holding the bag and most have probably given up.·19.12.2025I read today that the Chinese are trying to develop a chip like Nvidia and such is made with lithography. They have tried to copy the Dutch company's product but have not succeeded. Is that nothing the guys at Obducat should comment on and if it is within their business area because it could be a really nice cliffhanger.....
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
62 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 päivää sittenWell, what do you think? Personally, I've lost all confidence, especially in myself as a stock investor🤔·1 päivä sittenI did not agree to the last one and I don't feel particularly keen now either to put more money into a big black hole. The management is doing a terrible job when it comes to information, both regarding ongoing matters and in anticipation of these requests for even more money. They must, for crying out loud, explain where they see a market that will make the company grow and not just survive to cover employees' salaries and other costs. The question is crystal clear, will these contributions generate a large and sustainable revenue stream !? Otherwise, they can look to the stars for more money from us, I also have a faint uneasy feeling that there are people slowly but surely acquiring further majority in the company to then corner the shares and delist the company, and then they will have gotten all the years from us and still have the company. The big question is, as before..... What added value will the contribution create for us shareholders !?
- ·2.1. · MuokattuIndependent scouting - various sources: Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) appears to be heading towards a two-part future: (1) rapid and broad industrialized growth in “replication-first” areas (photonics/metasurfaces/AR optics, LED/PV, micro-optics), and (2) a more uncertain but seriously pursued path towards selected semiconductor steps where cost/energy/simple process flows can break through – if defectivity, overlay, and the template ecosystem reach “mass production in practice”. Where NIL stands right now NIL has matured significantly and is often highlighted as particularly attractive where one wants to copy the same nanostructure over and over again across large areas (e.g., diffractive optics, waveguides, metasurfaces). In advanced chip lithography, the most noted commercial venture is Canon's NIL platform (FPA-1200NZ2C), which Canon itself promotes as a more energy-efficient and potentially cheaper path than EUV in certain flows. What drives NIL forward (why interest is increasing) Cost and energy: Canon has explicitly marketed NIL as having significantly lower energy requirements and simpler process steps compared to EUV in their narrative. Photonics/AR and large areas: Roll-to-plate/rolling NIL is highlighted as an enabler for scalable manufacturing of AR waveguides/diffractive elements and related micro-optics. Template innovation: Things are happening around templates (stamps) and their resolution/production, which is central for NIL to scale to “real” volume. The biggest obstacles (what determines if NIL becomes “mainstream” in chips) In chip production, these are the classic “make-or-break” points: Defects/particles (contact process → sensitive to contamination) and yield issues. Overlay/alignment (placing many layers exactly on top of each other) and mechanical deformations/wafer-distortion in contact steps. Template lifespan, cost, and supply chain (manufacturing, inspection, cleaning, replacement). Probable development 2026–2030 1) Strongest and most probable growth: photonics & nano-optics Here, NIL's “copying strength” fits perfectly: the same grating/metasurface/waveguide structure can be replicated with high precision and good unit cost once the process is established. 2) Semiconductors: more selectively – first where NIL provides clear ROI Rather than “replacing EUV outright,” it is more realistic that NIL takes niches or specific layers (e.g., patterns that are well suited for imprint, or where cost/energy/tool flow dominate). Canon also positions NIL as an EUV alternative for cost/energy, but the industry is still in a phase where proof in HVM (high-volume manufacturing) is what counts. 3) EUV will not be “idle” – and that affects NIL's window EUV (incl. High-NA) continues to be driven forward despite very high tool costs, which means NIL must win where EUV becomes too expensive/energy-intensive or where NIL offers fewer process steps with acceptable yield. What I would keep an eye on (signal intelligence) Independent HVM results: not just press releases – but yield/defectivity/overlay data over time. Template ecosystem: delivery capacity, inspection, cleaning, lifespan, and cost per wafer. Breakthroughs in AR/metasurfaces: if AR waveguides/metasurfaces scale in volume, NIL could become “default” for that entire optics class.
- ·18.12.2025I'm probably the only one left holding the bag because no one is answering. That was indeed unfortunate..... Any thoughts out there?·19.12.2025On the contrary! Most are probably left holding the bag and most have probably given up.·19.12.2025I read today that the Chinese are trying to develop a chip like Nvidia and such is made with lithography. They have tried to copy the Dutch company's product but have not succeeded. Is that nothing the guys at Obducat should comment on and if it is within their business area because it could be a really nice cliffhanger.....
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nordic Growth Market
Määrä
Osto
105 913
Myynti
Määrä
49 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 565 | AVA | SWB | ||
| 16 435 | ENS | SWB | ||
| 565 | ENS | SWB | ||
| 19 | AVA | SHB | ||
| 503 | AVA | SHB |
Ylin
0,083VWAP
Alin
0,076VaihtoMäärä
0,1 646 530
VWAP
Ylin
0,083Alin
0,076VaihtoMäärä
0,1 646 530
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q4 -tulosraportti | 20.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 25.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 9.5.2025 | |
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 14.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 14.2.2025 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
Vain PDF
62 päivää sitten
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q4 -tulosraportti | 20.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 25.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 9.5.2025 | |
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 14.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 14.2.2025 |
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·2 päivää sittenWell, what do you think? Personally, I've lost all confidence, especially in myself as a stock investor🤔·1 päivä sittenI did not agree to the last one and I don't feel particularly keen now either to put more money into a big black hole. The management is doing a terrible job when it comes to information, both regarding ongoing matters and in anticipation of these requests for even more money. They must, for crying out loud, explain where they see a market that will make the company grow and not just survive to cover employees' salaries and other costs. The question is crystal clear, will these contributions generate a large and sustainable revenue stream !? Otherwise, they can look to the stars for more money from us, I also have a faint uneasy feeling that there are people slowly but surely acquiring further majority in the company to then corner the shares and delist the company, and then they will have gotten all the years from us and still have the company. The big question is, as before..... What added value will the contribution create for us shareholders !?
- ·2.1. · MuokattuIndependent scouting - various sources: Nanoimprint Lithography (NIL) appears to be heading towards a two-part future: (1) rapid and broad industrialized growth in “replication-first” areas (photonics/metasurfaces/AR optics, LED/PV, micro-optics), and (2) a more uncertain but seriously pursued path towards selected semiconductor steps where cost/energy/simple process flows can break through – if defectivity, overlay, and the template ecosystem reach “mass production in practice”. Where NIL stands right now NIL has matured significantly and is often highlighted as particularly attractive where one wants to copy the same nanostructure over and over again across large areas (e.g., diffractive optics, waveguides, metasurfaces). In advanced chip lithography, the most noted commercial venture is Canon's NIL platform (FPA-1200NZ2C), which Canon itself promotes as a more energy-efficient and potentially cheaper path than EUV in certain flows. What drives NIL forward (why interest is increasing) Cost and energy: Canon has explicitly marketed NIL as having significantly lower energy requirements and simpler process steps compared to EUV in their narrative. Photonics/AR and large areas: Roll-to-plate/rolling NIL is highlighted as an enabler for scalable manufacturing of AR waveguides/diffractive elements and related micro-optics. Template innovation: Things are happening around templates (stamps) and their resolution/production, which is central for NIL to scale to “real” volume. The biggest obstacles (what determines if NIL becomes “mainstream” in chips) In chip production, these are the classic “make-or-break” points: Defects/particles (contact process → sensitive to contamination) and yield issues. Overlay/alignment (placing many layers exactly on top of each other) and mechanical deformations/wafer-distortion in contact steps. Template lifespan, cost, and supply chain (manufacturing, inspection, cleaning, replacement). Probable development 2026–2030 1) Strongest and most probable growth: photonics & nano-optics Here, NIL's “copying strength” fits perfectly: the same grating/metasurface/waveguide structure can be replicated with high precision and good unit cost once the process is established. 2) Semiconductors: more selectively – first where NIL provides clear ROI Rather than “replacing EUV outright,” it is more realistic that NIL takes niches or specific layers (e.g., patterns that are well suited for imprint, or where cost/energy/tool flow dominate). Canon also positions NIL as an EUV alternative for cost/energy, but the industry is still in a phase where proof in HVM (high-volume manufacturing) is what counts. 3) EUV will not be “idle” – and that affects NIL's window EUV (incl. High-NA) continues to be driven forward despite very high tool costs, which means NIL must win where EUV becomes too expensive/energy-intensive or where NIL offers fewer process steps with acceptable yield. What I would keep an eye on (signal intelligence) Independent HVM results: not just press releases – but yield/defectivity/overlay data over time. Template ecosystem: delivery capacity, inspection, cleaning, lifespan, and cost per wafer. Breakthroughs in AR/metasurfaces: if AR waveguides/metasurfaces scale in volume, NIL could become “default” for that entire optics class.
- ·18.12.2025I'm probably the only one left holding the bag because no one is answering. That was indeed unfortunate..... Any thoughts out there?·19.12.2025On the contrary! Most are probably left holding the bag and most have probably given up.·19.12.2025I read today that the Chinese are trying to develop a chip like Nvidia and such is made with lithography. They have tried to copy the Dutch company's product but have not succeeded. Is that nothing the guys at Obducat should comment on and if it is within their business area because it could be a really nice cliffhanger.....
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nordic Growth Market
Määrä
Osto
105 913
Myynti
Määrä
49 000
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 565 | AVA | SWB | ||
| 16 435 | ENS | SWB | ||
| 565 | ENS | SWB | ||
| 19 | AVA | SHB | ||
| 503 | AVA | SHB |
Ylin
0,083VWAP
Alin
0,076VaihtoMäärä
0,1 646 530
VWAP
Ylin
0,083Alin
0,076VaihtoMäärä
0,1 646 530
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt