2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
38 päivää sitten31 min
4,00 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,55 %Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
1 000
Myynti
Määrä
178
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 517 | - | - | ||
| 1 357 | - | - | ||
| 1 937 | - | - | ||
| 1 937 | - | - | ||
| 9 210 | - | - |
Ylin
112,6VWAP
Alin
111,5VaihtoMäärä
121,2 1 084 023
VWAP
Ylin
112,6Alin
111,5VaihtoMäärä
121,2 1 084 023
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 12.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 14.7. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 9.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 29.10.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·3 päivää sittenDividend, compared to capital appreciation of a given share, is somewhat negative - unless one personally needs regular liquidity injection. One realizes this in some companies that then choose not to pay out dividends but rather use profit for investments, and share buybacks. As a personal investor (share and fund account) one is charged with dividend tax and can then reinvest the crumbs. Of course, the pain of taxation is postponed on an ASK or Zero account, - where in return one has the pleasure of paying ongoing wealth tax on the latent tax in the account. -A brilliant measure from the tax-eager Norwegian politicians - so-called wealth tax on tax debt. My opinion: I personally don't care much about dividends or not - except for the share price fluctuations that occur when enthusiasm overflows regarding a decided dividend. :) - But I understand that others are .....
·2 päivää sittenYou have forgotten the shielding deduction which is of crucial importance when the account reaches a certain size. Admittedly not in the low-interest years, but now it seems to yield an okay return. It accumulates when not utilized. How one uses it is up to each individual, I like to reap benefits along the way. Taking profit to reduce financial risk is never wrong. It's easy to become greedy, but the most risk-taking are also those who have succeeded best in the market over the last 5 years. You can regulate your wealth tax through tax planning. What and how you can read about on various pages. Tip: there is no more debt on a new car. For example, I complained about the valuation of my primary residence a few years ago and it was approved. Bergen municipality had assessed the residence at almost 35% over the sales price. The municipality was too greedy, I wouldn't have bothered if it was 10%. Start from your current tax position, then take measures to bring down your wealth tax. Regarding a company's share purchases in its own company, Swedish Match's cannibal strategy is one of the most successful I know of. One should read a bit about it. Thomas Nielsen sold the company just before it was acquired. The guy is game, appeared in the media and explained what, how and why. Like him. Equinor and other companies have tended to make acquisitions in other companies at an inflated price when things are going exceptionally well for themselves. The oil sands adventure, shale oil, onshore oil in unstable parts of the world, Ørsted (I think this could be okay in the long run), various subsidized offshore wind turbine stuff, and Scatec which has been good. They should rather have bought back and cancelled their own shares in addition to paying out extraordinary dividends. Another stark example is Schibsted's purchase of Viaplay or the company that Strong paid too much for. Helge Lund and Skogen Lund are still highly respected leaders in Norway and the golden parachutes they received were of significant importance. Company leadership is not just about enduring difficult times, but also what one does when things are going well. How long has Orkla's current management been doing what they've been asked to do? To make visible and sell off parts of the business. However, they also have some skeletons in the closet, Vitapro is the prime example of overpricing.
·18.12.Exciting to see if resistance at 114.50 is passed before Christmas. In that case, the way is open to 121.30
·3 päivää sittenEgiherm. Now m1ster probably had a reflection regarding return yield. Not unlike your reflection regarding dividend expectations. Both are input in the return debate/speculation. Furthermore, in that regard, I can refute your input that the buyback (4 bn) comes from the cash balance (it is "only" 1 bn in Q3). This is taken from the share capital. Reference is made to earlier. Orkla ASA («Orkla») has decided to implement a share buyback program. The purpose of the buyback program is to return excess capital to the shareholders by reducing the company's share capital.
·15.12.Geisha will turn into porridge this year too, it seems 😆
·15.12.I bought 2
·13.12.Is this worth holding in the portfolio, as a defensive stock with stable dividend + inflation defense?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
38 päivää sitten31 min
4,00 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,55 %Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenDividend, compared to capital appreciation of a given share, is somewhat negative - unless one personally needs regular liquidity injection. One realizes this in some companies that then choose not to pay out dividends but rather use profit for investments, and share buybacks. As a personal investor (share and fund account) one is charged with dividend tax and can then reinvest the crumbs. Of course, the pain of taxation is postponed on an ASK or Zero account, - where in return one has the pleasure of paying ongoing wealth tax on the latent tax in the account. -A brilliant measure from the tax-eager Norwegian politicians - so-called wealth tax on tax debt. My opinion: I personally don't care much about dividends or not - except for the share price fluctuations that occur when enthusiasm overflows regarding a decided dividend. :) - But I understand that others are .....·2 päivää sittenYou have forgotten the shielding deduction which is of crucial importance when the account reaches a certain size. Admittedly not in the low-interest years, but now it seems to yield an okay return. It accumulates when not utilized. How one uses it is up to each individual, I like to reap benefits along the way. Taking profit to reduce financial risk is never wrong. It's easy to become greedy, but the most risk-taking are also those who have succeeded best in the market over the last 5 years. You can regulate your wealth tax through tax planning. What and how you can read about on various pages. Tip: there is no more debt on a new car. For example, I complained about the valuation of my primary residence a few years ago and it was approved. Bergen municipality had assessed the residence at almost 35% over the sales price. The municipality was too greedy, I wouldn't have bothered if it was 10%. Start from your current tax position, then take measures to bring down your wealth tax. Regarding a company's share purchases in its own company, Swedish Match's cannibal strategy is one of the most successful I know of. One should read a bit about it. Thomas Nielsen sold the company just before it was acquired. The guy is game, appeared in the media and explained what, how and why. Like him. Equinor and other companies have tended to make acquisitions in other companies at an inflated price when things are going exceptionally well for themselves. The oil sands adventure, shale oil, onshore oil in unstable parts of the world, Ørsted (I think this could be okay in the long run), various subsidized offshore wind turbine stuff, and Scatec which has been good. They should rather have bought back and cancelled their own shares in addition to paying out extraordinary dividends. Another stark example is Schibsted's purchase of Viaplay or the company that Strong paid too much for. Helge Lund and Skogen Lund are still highly respected leaders in Norway and the golden parachutes they received were of significant importance. Company leadership is not just about enduring difficult times, but also what one does when things are going well. How long has Orkla's current management been doing what they've been asked to do? To make visible and sell off parts of the business. However, they also have some skeletons in the closet, Vitapro is the prime example of overpricing.
- ·18.12.Exciting to see if resistance at 114.50 is passed before Christmas. In that case, the way is open to 121.30·3 päivää sittenEgiherm. Now m1ster probably had a reflection regarding return yield. Not unlike your reflection regarding dividend expectations. Both are input in the return debate/speculation. Furthermore, in that regard, I can refute your input that the buyback (4 bn) comes from the cash balance (it is "only" 1 bn in Q3). This is taken from the share capital. Reference is made to earlier. Orkla ASA («Orkla») has decided to implement a share buyback program. The purpose of the buyback program is to return excess capital to the shareholders by reducing the company's share capital.
- ·15.12.Geisha will turn into porridge this year too, it seems 😆·15.12.I bought 2
- ·13.12.Is this worth holding in the portfolio, as a defensive stock with stable dividend + inflation defense?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
1 000
Myynti
Määrä
178
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 517 | - | - | ||
| 1 357 | - | - | ||
| 1 937 | - | - | ||
| 1 937 | - | - | ||
| 9 210 | - | - |
Ylin
112,6VWAP
Alin
111,5VaihtoMäärä
121,2 1 084 023
VWAP
Ylin
112,6Alin
111,5VaihtoMäärä
121,2 1 084 023
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 12.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 14.7. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 9.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 29.10.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
38 päivää sitten31 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 12.2.2026 |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 14.11. | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 14.7. | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 9.5. | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 13.2. | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 29.10.2024 |
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
4,00 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,55 %Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sittenDividend, compared to capital appreciation of a given share, is somewhat negative - unless one personally needs regular liquidity injection. One realizes this in some companies that then choose not to pay out dividends but rather use profit for investments, and share buybacks. As a personal investor (share and fund account) one is charged with dividend tax and can then reinvest the crumbs. Of course, the pain of taxation is postponed on an ASK or Zero account, - where in return one has the pleasure of paying ongoing wealth tax on the latent tax in the account. -A brilliant measure from the tax-eager Norwegian politicians - so-called wealth tax on tax debt. My opinion: I personally don't care much about dividends or not - except for the share price fluctuations that occur when enthusiasm overflows regarding a decided dividend. :) - But I understand that others are .....·2 päivää sittenYou have forgotten the shielding deduction which is of crucial importance when the account reaches a certain size. Admittedly not in the low-interest years, but now it seems to yield an okay return. It accumulates when not utilized. How one uses it is up to each individual, I like to reap benefits along the way. Taking profit to reduce financial risk is never wrong. It's easy to become greedy, but the most risk-taking are also those who have succeeded best in the market over the last 5 years. You can regulate your wealth tax through tax planning. What and how you can read about on various pages. Tip: there is no more debt on a new car. For example, I complained about the valuation of my primary residence a few years ago and it was approved. Bergen municipality had assessed the residence at almost 35% over the sales price. The municipality was too greedy, I wouldn't have bothered if it was 10%. Start from your current tax position, then take measures to bring down your wealth tax. Regarding a company's share purchases in its own company, Swedish Match's cannibal strategy is one of the most successful I know of. One should read a bit about it. Thomas Nielsen sold the company just before it was acquired. The guy is game, appeared in the media and explained what, how and why. Like him. Equinor and other companies have tended to make acquisitions in other companies at an inflated price when things are going exceptionally well for themselves. The oil sands adventure, shale oil, onshore oil in unstable parts of the world, Ørsted (I think this could be okay in the long run), various subsidized offshore wind turbine stuff, and Scatec which has been good. They should rather have bought back and cancelled their own shares in addition to paying out extraordinary dividends. Another stark example is Schibsted's purchase of Viaplay or the company that Strong paid too much for. Helge Lund and Skogen Lund are still highly respected leaders in Norway and the golden parachutes they received were of significant importance. Company leadership is not just about enduring difficult times, but also what one does when things are going well. How long has Orkla's current management been doing what they've been asked to do? To make visible and sell off parts of the business. However, they also have some skeletons in the closet, Vitapro is the prime example of overpricing.
- ·18.12.Exciting to see if resistance at 114.50 is passed before Christmas. In that case, the way is open to 121.30·3 päivää sittenEgiherm. Now m1ster probably had a reflection regarding return yield. Not unlike your reflection regarding dividend expectations. Both are input in the return debate/speculation. Furthermore, in that regard, I can refute your input that the buyback (4 bn) comes from the cash balance (it is "only" 1 bn in Q3). This is taken from the share capital. Reference is made to earlier. Orkla ASA («Orkla») has decided to implement a share buyback program. The purpose of the buyback program is to return excess capital to the shareholders by reducing the company's share capital.
- ·15.12.Geisha will turn into porridge this year too, it seems 😆·15.12.I bought 2
- ·13.12.Is this worth holding in the portfolio, as a defensive stock with stable dividend + inflation defense?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
1 000
Myynti
Määrä
178
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 517 | - | - | ||
| 1 357 | - | - | ||
| 1 937 | - | - | ||
| 1 937 | - | - | ||
| 9 210 | - | - |
Ylin
112,6VWAP
Alin
111,5VaihtoMäärä
121,2 1 084 023
VWAP
Ylin
112,6Alin
111,5VaihtoMäärä
121,2 1 084 023
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt