2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
26 päivää sitten
‧29 min
0,3231 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
18,83%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 660 | - | - | ||
| 1 000 | - | - | ||
| 1 255 | - | - | ||
| 16 308 | - | - | ||
| 19 089 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 18.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 26.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 29.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 27.8.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·9 t sittenSome interesting reading in light of the Ventura deal: stock-financed acquisitions apparently often get hammered because the market assumes the buyer uses overvalued own shares as currency. This is an article from 2009.
·12 t sitten · MuokattuPositive view, but high execution and capital structure risk " Investment case SED Energy is undergoing a significant transformation. The company has already delivered strong growth in 2026, with 50 percent higher revenue and 72 percent higher adjusted EBITDA in Q2. H1 operational cash flow was USD 80.6 million, while net interest-bearing debt was reduced to only USD 17.6 million, corresponding to 0.1x LTM adjusted EBITDA. ([Energy Holdings][1]) The most important aspect for the case, however, is the Ventura transaction. The planned all-share transaction adds a significant deepwater drilling business to SED and increases total contract backlog to around USD 1.3 billion. Ventura shareholders are to receive up to 605 million new SED shares, which gives existing SED shareholders around 55 percent of the new company. ([Energy Holdings][2]) This makes the case interesting because SED is transforming from a relatively small company with strong cash generation to a larger offshore platform with multiple revenue streams. The central question is not whether the company will become larger. It will. The question is whether "the increase in EBITDA and free cash flow per share will be greater than the effect of dilution." This, in my assessment, will determine the repricing. " Key numbers | Key figures | SED before Ventura | | ---------------------------- | --------------: | | Share price | NOK 7.54 | | Q2 revenue growth | +50 % | | H1 revenue growth | +40 % | | Q2 adj. EBITDA growth | +72 % | | H1 adj. EBITDA growth | +44 % | | Operational cash flow H1 | USD 80.6m | | Net debt | USD 17.6m | | Net debt / LTM EBITDA | 0.1x | | Firm backlog | USD 342m | | Ventura + SED backlog | approx. USD 1.3bn | | Ventura consideration shares | up to 605m | | Expected ownership stake SED | approx. 55 % | | Expected ownership stake Ventura | approx. 45 % | | DNB bridge facility | USD 250m | | Q2 distribution | USD 25m | | 2026 distribution guidance | USD 90-110m | SED's Q2 figures show that the existing business already has high cash generation and low debt. ([Energy Holdings][1]) " Catalysts "1. Definitive Ventura agreement This is clearly the most important catalyst. The LOI is still not a completed merger. Final agreement, due diligence, and necessary approvals remain. The transaction is currently expected to be completed in Q1 2027. ([Energy Holdings][2]) A final agreement will reduce much of the transaction risk and make it easier for the market to value the combined business. ### 2. USD 1.3 bn backlog The backlog is perhaps the most important fundamental argument for the case. SED currently has USD 342 million in firm backlog. After Ventura, this increases to around USD 1.3 billion. ([Energy Holdings][1]) This provides significantly better visibility on future revenues. " 3. Cash flow and distributions SED has already distributed USD 132.5 million to shareholders since its inception. The company also has a 2026 guidance of USD 90-110 million in total distributions. ([Energy Holdings][2]) The next announced distribution is USD 25 million, estimated at NOK 0.32 per share. ([London South East][3]) This makes SED more interesting for investors looking for direct capital returns in addition to share price appreciation. " 4. Possible USA listing After completion, the company is considering a possible American dual listing/IPO. This is not part of today's base case, but could potentially provide greater access to the capital market and more investors. The company itself has referred to this as an opportunity after the transaction. ([Energy Holdings][2]) " Risks " 1. Dilution This is the most important risk. Up to 605 million new shares are to be issued to Ventura shareholders. Thus, Ventura must contribute enough EBITDA and free cash flow for the value per existing SED share to increase. If the market focuses more on the number of new shares than on the increased cash flow, the share may have problems with repricing. " 2. Debt SED currently has a very conservative balance sheet with only USD 17.6 million in net debt. ([Energy Holdings][1]) The Ventura transaction also involves a USD 250 million bridge facility from DNB for refinancing Ventura and liquidity needs until completion. ([Energy Holdings][2]) This means that the capital structure becomes significantly more important after the merger. " 3. Rig rates and utilization The combined company becomes more exposed to offshore drilling. Thus, dayrates, utilization, contract renewals, and any periods without contract become more important for valuation. " 4. Transaction risk This is still an LOI. There is no guarantee that a final agreement will be entered into orI myself have a position in SED Energy, and the analysis is therefore not entirely neutral. I have a positive view on the stock and can therefore naturally emphasize the factors I believe support the investment case. The analysis should therefore be seen as my own assessment and scenario analysis, not as an objective recommendation.
·13 t sittenSome thoughts after the presentation of the merger on September 11. In the presentation, there is a sheet showing free cash flow (available as dividend) at different scenarios regarding day rates. Purely strategically, I don't think the company would have set mid and high case so high if they believed that rates going forward would be very weak. It would indeed be a small "defeat" if they sign three new contracts that end up in the lowest tier for expected rates? One must also remember that they have ongoing contract meetings for extensions that are not yet signed, and it would be perceived as a weak delivery from ENH if they sign in the weakest third of the outcome space they themselves have outlined. Therefore, I believe this share price weakening due to uncertainty can be a gift package for those who want to get in now. The company that works with this daily almost certainly knows that they won't end up at the very bottom here. In that case, they would have lowered the entire guidance, and mid-case would, for example, be the best possible outcome for new contracts. The bottom line is that many are painting a bleak picture and believing in the worst case, while it is unlikely to happen.
Rates in the long term probably look like they will be good. More exploration and limited various rigs. There will be a squeeze in a few years and I expect rates will be well market-adjusted according to the contracts. The renewals now will probably be in the starting blocks for a long-lasting rate upturn for rigs.
1 päivä sittenQ2 looks very strong in terms of margins, FCF and distributions, but the 40% YoY decline in backlog concerns me a bit. How do you guys view 2027–28 if new contract awards remain delayed? Are the current distribution levels sustainable, or is the investment case heavily dependent on rebuilding the backlog?
Possibly this is a bit too bold a speculation, but this could be part of the reason for the LoI regarding a merger with Ventura from SED's perspective; SED gains increased flexibility with regard to slipping a bit on the next contract (if they wish to) since Ventura already has a good backlog.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
26 päivää sitten
‧29 min
0,3231 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
18,83%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenSome interesting reading in light of the Ventura deal: stock-financed acquisitions apparently often get hammered because the market assumes the buyer uses overvalued own shares as currency. This is an article from 2009.
- ·12 t sitten · MuokattuPositive view, but high execution and capital structure risk " Investment case SED Energy is undergoing a significant transformation. The company has already delivered strong growth in 2026, with 50 percent higher revenue and 72 percent higher adjusted EBITDA in Q2. H1 operational cash flow was USD 80.6 million, while net interest-bearing debt was reduced to only USD 17.6 million, corresponding to 0.1x LTM adjusted EBITDA. ([Energy Holdings][1]) The most important aspect for the case, however, is the Ventura transaction. The planned all-share transaction adds a significant deepwater drilling business to SED and increases total contract backlog to around USD 1.3 billion. Ventura shareholders are to receive up to 605 million new SED shares, which gives existing SED shareholders around 55 percent of the new company. ([Energy Holdings][2]) This makes the case interesting because SED is transforming from a relatively small company with strong cash generation to a larger offshore platform with multiple revenue streams. The central question is not whether the company will become larger. It will. The question is whether "the increase in EBITDA and free cash flow per share will be greater than the effect of dilution." This, in my assessment, will determine the repricing. " Key numbers | Key figures | SED before Ventura | | ---------------------------- | --------------: | | Share price | NOK 7.54 | | Q2 revenue growth | +50 % | | H1 revenue growth | +40 % | | Q2 adj. EBITDA growth | +72 % | | H1 adj. EBITDA growth | +44 % | | Operational cash flow H1 | USD 80.6m | | Net debt | USD 17.6m | | Net debt / LTM EBITDA | 0.1x | | Firm backlog | USD 342m | | Ventura + SED backlog | approx. USD 1.3bn | | Ventura consideration shares | up to 605m | | Expected ownership stake SED | approx. 55 % | | Expected ownership stake Ventura | approx. 45 % | | DNB bridge facility | USD 250m | | Q2 distribution | USD 25m | | 2026 distribution guidance | USD 90-110m | SED's Q2 figures show that the existing business already has high cash generation and low debt. ([Energy Holdings][1]) " Catalysts "1. Definitive Ventura agreement This is clearly the most important catalyst. The LOI is still not a completed merger. Final agreement, due diligence, and necessary approvals remain. The transaction is currently expected to be completed in Q1 2027. ([Energy Holdings][2]) A final agreement will reduce much of the transaction risk and make it easier for the market to value the combined business. ### 2. USD 1.3 bn backlog The backlog is perhaps the most important fundamental argument for the case. SED currently has USD 342 million in firm backlog. After Ventura, this increases to around USD 1.3 billion. ([Energy Holdings][1]) This provides significantly better visibility on future revenues. " 3. Cash flow and distributions SED has already distributed USD 132.5 million to shareholders since its inception. The company also has a 2026 guidance of USD 90-110 million in total distributions. ([Energy Holdings][2]) The next announced distribution is USD 25 million, estimated at NOK 0.32 per share. ([London South East][3]) This makes SED more interesting for investors looking for direct capital returns in addition to share price appreciation. " 4. Possible USA listing After completion, the company is considering a possible American dual listing/IPO. This is not part of today's base case, but could potentially provide greater access to the capital market and more investors. The company itself has referred to this as an opportunity after the transaction. ([Energy Holdings][2]) " Risks " 1. Dilution This is the most important risk. Up to 605 million new shares are to be issued to Ventura shareholders. Thus, Ventura must contribute enough EBITDA and free cash flow for the value per existing SED share to increase. If the market focuses more on the number of new shares than on the increased cash flow, the share may have problems with repricing. " 2. Debt SED currently has a very conservative balance sheet with only USD 17.6 million in net debt. ([Energy Holdings][1]) The Ventura transaction also involves a USD 250 million bridge facility from DNB for refinancing Ventura and liquidity needs until completion. ([Energy Holdings][2]) This means that the capital structure becomes significantly more important after the merger. " 3. Rig rates and utilization The combined company becomes more exposed to offshore drilling. Thus, dayrates, utilization, contract renewals, and any periods without contract become more important for valuation. " 4. Transaction risk This is still an LOI. There is no guarantee that a final agreement will be entered into orI myself have a position in SED Energy, and the analysis is therefore not entirely neutral. I have a positive view on the stock and can therefore naturally emphasize the factors I believe support the investment case. The analysis should therefore be seen as my own assessment and scenario analysis, not as an objective recommendation.
- ·13 t sittenSome thoughts after the presentation of the merger on September 11. In the presentation, there is a sheet showing free cash flow (available as dividend) at different scenarios regarding day rates. Purely strategically, I don't think the company would have set mid and high case so high if they believed that rates going forward would be very weak. It would indeed be a small "defeat" if they sign three new contracts that end up in the lowest tier for expected rates? One must also remember that they have ongoing contract meetings for extensions that are not yet signed, and it would be perceived as a weak delivery from ENH if they sign in the weakest third of the outcome space they themselves have outlined. Therefore, I believe this share price weakening due to uncertainty can be a gift package for those who want to get in now. The company that works with this daily almost certainly knows that they won't end up at the very bottom here. In that case, they would have lowered the entire guidance, and mid-case would, for example, be the best possible outcome for new contracts. The bottom line is that many are painting a bleak picture and believing in the worst case, while it is unlikely to happen.Rates in the long term probably look like they will be good. More exploration and limited various rigs. There will be a squeeze in a few years and I expect rates will be well market-adjusted according to the contracts. The renewals now will probably be in the starting blocks for a long-lasting rate upturn for rigs.
- 1 päivä sittenQ2 looks very strong in terms of margins, FCF and distributions, but the 40% YoY decline in backlog concerns me a bit. How do you guys view 2027–28 if new contract awards remain delayed? Are the current distribution levels sustainable, or is the investment case heavily dependent on rebuilding the backlog?Possibly this is a bit too bold a speculation, but this could be part of the reason for the LoI regarding a merger with Ventura from SED's perspective; SED gains increased flexibility with regard to slipping a bit on the next contract (if they wish to) since Ventura already has a good backlog.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 660 | - | - | ||
| 1 000 | - | - | ||
| 1 255 | - | - | ||
| 16 308 | - | - | ||
| 19 089 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 18.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 26.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 29.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 27.8.2025 |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
26 päivää sitten
‧29 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 18.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 26.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 29.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 24.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 27.8.2025 |
0,3231 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
18,83%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·9 t sittenSome interesting reading in light of the Ventura deal: stock-financed acquisitions apparently often get hammered because the market assumes the buyer uses overvalued own shares as currency. This is an article from 2009.
- ·12 t sitten · MuokattuPositive view, but high execution and capital structure risk " Investment case SED Energy is undergoing a significant transformation. The company has already delivered strong growth in 2026, with 50 percent higher revenue and 72 percent higher adjusted EBITDA in Q2. H1 operational cash flow was USD 80.6 million, while net interest-bearing debt was reduced to only USD 17.6 million, corresponding to 0.1x LTM adjusted EBITDA. ([Energy Holdings][1]) The most important aspect for the case, however, is the Ventura transaction. The planned all-share transaction adds a significant deepwater drilling business to SED and increases total contract backlog to around USD 1.3 billion. Ventura shareholders are to receive up to 605 million new SED shares, which gives existing SED shareholders around 55 percent of the new company. ([Energy Holdings][2]) This makes the case interesting because SED is transforming from a relatively small company with strong cash generation to a larger offshore platform with multiple revenue streams. The central question is not whether the company will become larger. It will. The question is whether "the increase in EBITDA and free cash flow per share will be greater than the effect of dilution." This, in my assessment, will determine the repricing. " Key numbers | Key figures | SED before Ventura | | ---------------------------- | --------------: | | Share price | NOK 7.54 | | Q2 revenue growth | +50 % | | H1 revenue growth | +40 % | | Q2 adj. EBITDA growth | +72 % | | H1 adj. EBITDA growth | +44 % | | Operational cash flow H1 | USD 80.6m | | Net debt | USD 17.6m | | Net debt / LTM EBITDA | 0.1x | | Firm backlog | USD 342m | | Ventura + SED backlog | approx. USD 1.3bn | | Ventura consideration shares | up to 605m | | Expected ownership stake SED | approx. 55 % | | Expected ownership stake Ventura | approx. 45 % | | DNB bridge facility | USD 250m | | Q2 distribution | USD 25m | | 2026 distribution guidance | USD 90-110m | SED's Q2 figures show that the existing business already has high cash generation and low debt. ([Energy Holdings][1]) " Catalysts "1. Definitive Ventura agreement This is clearly the most important catalyst. The LOI is still not a completed merger. Final agreement, due diligence, and necessary approvals remain. The transaction is currently expected to be completed in Q1 2027. ([Energy Holdings][2]) A final agreement will reduce much of the transaction risk and make it easier for the market to value the combined business. ### 2. USD 1.3 bn backlog The backlog is perhaps the most important fundamental argument for the case. SED currently has USD 342 million in firm backlog. After Ventura, this increases to around USD 1.3 billion. ([Energy Holdings][1]) This provides significantly better visibility on future revenues. " 3. Cash flow and distributions SED has already distributed USD 132.5 million to shareholders since its inception. The company also has a 2026 guidance of USD 90-110 million in total distributions. ([Energy Holdings][2]) The next announced distribution is USD 25 million, estimated at NOK 0.32 per share. ([London South East][3]) This makes SED more interesting for investors looking for direct capital returns in addition to share price appreciation. " 4. Possible USA listing After completion, the company is considering a possible American dual listing/IPO. This is not part of today's base case, but could potentially provide greater access to the capital market and more investors. The company itself has referred to this as an opportunity after the transaction. ([Energy Holdings][2]) " Risks " 1. Dilution This is the most important risk. Up to 605 million new shares are to be issued to Ventura shareholders. Thus, Ventura must contribute enough EBITDA and free cash flow for the value per existing SED share to increase. If the market focuses more on the number of new shares than on the increased cash flow, the share may have problems with repricing. " 2. Debt SED currently has a very conservative balance sheet with only USD 17.6 million in net debt. ([Energy Holdings][1]) The Ventura transaction also involves a USD 250 million bridge facility from DNB for refinancing Ventura and liquidity needs until completion. ([Energy Holdings][2]) This means that the capital structure becomes significantly more important after the merger. " 3. Rig rates and utilization The combined company becomes more exposed to offshore drilling. Thus, dayrates, utilization, contract renewals, and any periods without contract become more important for valuation. " 4. Transaction risk This is still an LOI. There is no guarantee that a final agreement will be entered into orI myself have a position in SED Energy, and the analysis is therefore not entirely neutral. I have a positive view on the stock and can therefore naturally emphasize the factors I believe support the investment case. The analysis should therefore be seen as my own assessment and scenario analysis, not as an objective recommendation.
- ·13 t sittenSome thoughts after the presentation of the merger on September 11. In the presentation, there is a sheet showing free cash flow (available as dividend) at different scenarios regarding day rates. Purely strategically, I don't think the company would have set mid and high case so high if they believed that rates going forward would be very weak. It would indeed be a small "defeat" if they sign three new contracts that end up in the lowest tier for expected rates? One must also remember that they have ongoing contract meetings for extensions that are not yet signed, and it would be perceived as a weak delivery from ENH if they sign in the weakest third of the outcome space they themselves have outlined. Therefore, I believe this share price weakening due to uncertainty can be a gift package for those who want to get in now. The company that works with this daily almost certainly knows that they won't end up at the very bottom here. In that case, they would have lowered the entire guidance, and mid-case would, for example, be the best possible outcome for new contracts. The bottom line is that many are painting a bleak picture and believing in the worst case, while it is unlikely to happen.Rates in the long term probably look like they will be good. More exploration and limited various rigs. There will be a squeeze in a few years and I expect rates will be well market-adjusted according to the contracts. The renewals now will probably be in the starting blocks for a long-lasting rate upturn for rigs.
- 1 päivä sittenQ2 looks very strong in terms of margins, FCF and distributions, but the 40% YoY decline in backlog concerns me a bit. How do you guys view 2027–28 if new contract awards remain delayed? Are the current distribution levels sustainable, or is the investment case heavily dependent on rebuilding the backlog?Possibly this is a bit too bold a speculation, but this could be part of the reason for the LoI regarding a merger with Ventura from SED's perspective; SED gains increased flexibility with regard to slipping a bit on the next contract (if they wish to) since Ventura already has a good backlog.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 660 | - | - | ||
| 1 000 | - | - | ||
| 1 255 | - | - | ||
| 16 308 | - | - | ||
| 19 089 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastot ja ETF:t, joilla on osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt