2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
43 päivää sitten
‧22 min
0,187 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,14%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 764 | - | - | ||
| 12 | - | - | ||
| 28 | - | - | ||
| 237 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 25.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·5 t sittenI think project sales as promised are dragging out, and in the meantime, there is the conflict in the Middle East which could affect if information is not released to shareholders. I thought the message that the sale would roll over into the next year meant a quick sale!? If this sale is particularly difficult, could sales of other projects have been completed? What will Sneve say at Q1?
·5 t sittenWhat is interesting here is why it is taking so long. Is it because they plan to sell the entire energy portfolio and only be left with the data center part, or because the project sale will be much larger than initially assumed? If the negotiations had broken down, we would have been notified. I'd rather wait three more months if it means we sell 50 % more than initially planned in the negotiations.
·7 t sittenAdvanced dialogues since December. Negotiations in February. One probably actually expects something concrete before Q1 - April 29?- ·1 päivä sitten · Muokattuhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7446881574790430720-xO-Q?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAADg8JfQBO0jU0NlX48KPEJWJvEjHE6AUkTU I think this from Blix is quite bullish for Magnora, actually. Briefly explained: they are building out proper network infrastructure in the Nordics (100G, multiple routes, connection to Finland etc.). This provides better capacity, lower latency and less risk of downtime. Why is that important? Data centers (which Magnora is focusing on) are completely dependent on exactly this, not just power, but also good connectivity. -lower risk in Magnora's data center projects -more attractive for customers (AI, cloud etc.) -better basis for growth And since Magnora and Blix already collaborate (Storespeed), this looks more and more like something being built together, not by chance. In short: Blix builds the surrounding infrastructure – Magnora can reap the benefits.
·1 päivä sittenYes, one has co-ownership in Storespeed and of course there will be some form of cooperation here. The point is that I don't see this as being "quite bullish for Magnora". Maybe it's just me who's a bit tired of AI posts (which this obviously is). But companies like Blix, I believe, will be chosen because of what services they can deliver and not least price. I believe that this is what the owner of the facility (or developer if it's not the same actor) decides, and therefore this has less significance for Magnora. As I said, this is speculation, but it would surprise me if this, as I said, were to be very bullish. I now asked CoPilot to make a critical assessment of what Blix wrote, against all sorts of different comparisons against MGN but especially against similar companies like Blix. The answer from CoPilot (which is by no means a definitive answer) was that these are things that all "competitors" have, and that the points mentioned are, among other things, industry standard, requirements, and completely common. 1. 100G connection Answer: Yes – this is standard in the class Blix belongs to. 2. Full-table BGP Answer: Yes – absolutely standard. 3. POP structure in several regions Answer: Yes – completely normal. 4. Redundant routes / ring structure Answer: Yes – this is actually a requirement, not a choice. 5. Routes via Finland / Europe Answer: Yes – also common. 6. Edge-near presence Answer: Yes – this is an industry trend, not a Blix-unique strategy. 7. Connection to Equinix Fabric Answer: Yes – common among serious players. Answer: Yes – this is standard in the class Blix belongs to. 2. Full-table BGP Answer: Yes – absolutely standard. 3. POP structure in several regions Answer: Yes – completely normal. 4. Redundant routes / ring structure Answer: Yes – this is actually a requirement, not a choice. 5. Routes via Finland / Europe Answer: Yes – also common. 6. Edge-near presence Answer: Yes – this is an industry trend, not a Blix-uni strategy. 7. Connection to Equinix Fabric Answer: Yes – common among serious players - ·2 päivää sittenWhat are the thoughts on recession here on the thread?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
43 päivää sitten
‧22 min
0,187 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,14%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·5 t sittenI think project sales as promised are dragging out, and in the meantime, there is the conflict in the Middle East which could affect if information is not released to shareholders. I thought the message that the sale would roll over into the next year meant a quick sale!? If this sale is particularly difficult, could sales of other projects have been completed? What will Sneve say at Q1?·5 t sittenWhat is interesting here is why it is taking so long. Is it because they plan to sell the entire energy portfolio and only be left with the data center part, or because the project sale will be much larger than initially assumed? If the negotiations had broken down, we would have been notified. I'd rather wait three more months if it means we sell 50 % more than initially planned in the negotiations.
- ·7 t sittenAdvanced dialogues since December. Negotiations in February. One probably actually expects something concrete before Q1 - April 29?
- ·1 päivä sitten · Muokattuhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7446881574790430720-xO-Q?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAADg8JfQBO0jU0NlX48KPEJWJvEjHE6AUkTU I think this from Blix is quite bullish for Magnora, actually. Briefly explained: they are building out proper network infrastructure in the Nordics (100G, multiple routes, connection to Finland etc.). This provides better capacity, lower latency and less risk of downtime. Why is that important? Data centers (which Magnora is focusing on) are completely dependent on exactly this, not just power, but also good connectivity. -lower risk in Magnora's data center projects -more attractive for customers (AI, cloud etc.) -better basis for growth And since Magnora and Blix already collaborate (Storespeed), this looks more and more like something being built together, not by chance. In short: Blix builds the surrounding infrastructure – Magnora can reap the benefits.·1 päivä sittenYes, one has co-ownership in Storespeed and of course there will be some form of cooperation here. The point is that I don't see this as being "quite bullish for Magnora". Maybe it's just me who's a bit tired of AI posts (which this obviously is). But companies like Blix, I believe, will be chosen because of what services they can deliver and not least price. I believe that this is what the owner of the facility (or developer if it's not the same actor) decides, and therefore this has less significance for Magnora. As I said, this is speculation, but it would surprise me if this, as I said, were to be very bullish. I now asked CoPilot to make a critical assessment of what Blix wrote, against all sorts of different comparisons against MGN but especially against similar companies like Blix. The answer from CoPilot (which is by no means a definitive answer) was that these are things that all "competitors" have, and that the points mentioned are, among other things, industry standard, requirements, and completely common. 1. 100G connection Answer: Yes – this is standard in the class Blix belongs to. 2. Full-table BGP Answer: Yes – absolutely standard. 3. POP structure in several regions Answer: Yes – completely normal. 4. Redundant routes / ring structure Answer: Yes – this is actually a requirement, not a choice. 5. Routes via Finland / Europe Answer: Yes – also common. 6. Edge-near presence Answer: Yes – this is an industry trend, not a Blix-unique strategy. 7. Connection to Equinix Fabric Answer: Yes – common among serious players. Answer: Yes – this is standard in the class Blix belongs to. 2. Full-table BGP Answer: Yes – absolutely standard. 3. POP structure in several regions Answer: Yes – completely normal. 4. Redundant routes / ring structure Answer: Yes – this is actually a requirement, not a choice. 5. Routes via Finland / Europe Answer: Yes – also common. 6. Edge-near presence Answer: Yes – this is an industry trend, not a Blix-uni strategy. 7. Connection to Equinix Fabric Answer: Yes – common among serious players
- ·2 päivää sittenWhat are the thoughts on recession here on the thread?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 764 | - | - | ||
| 12 | - | - | ||
| 28 | - | - | ||
| 237 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 25.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
43 päivää sitten
‧22 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 29.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 25.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.7.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 25.4.2025 | ||
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti 27.2.2025 |
0,187 NOK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
3,14%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·5 t sittenI think project sales as promised are dragging out, and in the meantime, there is the conflict in the Middle East which could affect if information is not released to shareholders. I thought the message that the sale would roll over into the next year meant a quick sale!? If this sale is particularly difficult, could sales of other projects have been completed? What will Sneve say at Q1?·5 t sittenWhat is interesting here is why it is taking so long. Is it because they plan to sell the entire energy portfolio and only be left with the data center part, or because the project sale will be much larger than initially assumed? If the negotiations had broken down, we would have been notified. I'd rather wait three more months if it means we sell 50 % more than initially planned in the negotiations.
- ·7 t sittenAdvanced dialogues since December. Negotiations in February. One probably actually expects something concrete before Q1 - April 29?
- ·1 päivä sitten · Muokattuhttps://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7446881574790430720-xO-Q?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&rcm=ACoAADg8JfQBO0jU0NlX48KPEJWJvEjHE6AUkTU I think this from Blix is quite bullish for Magnora, actually. Briefly explained: they are building out proper network infrastructure in the Nordics (100G, multiple routes, connection to Finland etc.). This provides better capacity, lower latency and less risk of downtime. Why is that important? Data centers (which Magnora is focusing on) are completely dependent on exactly this, not just power, but also good connectivity. -lower risk in Magnora's data center projects -more attractive for customers (AI, cloud etc.) -better basis for growth And since Magnora and Blix already collaborate (Storespeed), this looks more and more like something being built together, not by chance. In short: Blix builds the surrounding infrastructure – Magnora can reap the benefits.·1 päivä sittenYes, one has co-ownership in Storespeed and of course there will be some form of cooperation here. The point is that I don't see this as being "quite bullish for Magnora". Maybe it's just me who's a bit tired of AI posts (which this obviously is). But companies like Blix, I believe, will be chosen because of what services they can deliver and not least price. I believe that this is what the owner of the facility (or developer if it's not the same actor) decides, and therefore this has less significance for Magnora. As I said, this is speculation, but it would surprise me if this, as I said, were to be very bullish. I now asked CoPilot to make a critical assessment of what Blix wrote, against all sorts of different comparisons against MGN but especially against similar companies like Blix. The answer from CoPilot (which is by no means a definitive answer) was that these are things that all "competitors" have, and that the points mentioned are, among other things, industry standard, requirements, and completely common. 1. 100G connection Answer: Yes – this is standard in the class Blix belongs to. 2. Full-table BGP Answer: Yes – absolutely standard. 3. POP structure in several regions Answer: Yes – completely normal. 4. Redundant routes / ring structure Answer: Yes – this is actually a requirement, not a choice. 5. Routes via Finland / Europe Answer: Yes – also common. 6. Edge-near presence Answer: Yes – this is an industry trend, not a Blix-unique strategy. 7. Connection to Equinix Fabric Answer: Yes – common among serious players. Answer: Yes – this is standard in the class Blix belongs to. 2. Full-table BGP Answer: Yes – absolutely standard. 3. POP structure in several regions Answer: Yes – completely normal. 4. Redundant routes / ring structure Answer: Yes – this is actually a requirement, not a choice. 5. Routes via Finland / Europe Answer: Yes – also common. 6. Edge-near presence Answer: Yes – this is an industry trend, not a Blix-uni strategy. 7. Connection to Equinix Fabric Answer: Yes – common among serious players
- ·2 päivää sittenWhat are the thoughts on recession here on the thread?
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Oslo Børs
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | - | ||
| 764 | - | - | ||
| 12 | - | - | ||
| 28 | - | - | ||
| 237 | - | - |
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt