2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
53 päivää sitten
‧1 t 1 min
4,70 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 15.10.
6,59%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | - | - | ||
| 803 | - | - | ||
| 878 | - | - | ||
| 1 004 | - | - | ||
| 666 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 19.5. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.7.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·3 t sittenI see that some are praising starlink. I, who have tried starlink in several places, think it's overpriced crap. For information, I used starlink in Sotra and Askøy in Western Norway. Clear view of the sky, followed all instructions. Ended up giving up on that stuff, incredibly bad speed compared to what you pay for. This was 1 year ago. Yes, Telenor is expensive, they squeeze everything they can from people. I see that as a big negative with Telenor. They are basically DNB, but in telecom. But compared to starlink, starlink is boss. At least at the current stage. I believe that the focus on the Nordics now will create more stable cash flows and margins than one could expect from Asia/Middle East. Yes, it is more expensive to acquire here in this country and more expensive to operate, but you get a much more stable group. Telenor's biggest problem is that they don't grow much, we hope these acquisitions lead to increased EPS. I see again and again that companies with sideways EPS usually end up falling significantly, because most investors want to invest in "up and to the right" graphs. I'm unsure about the stock price, P/E says it's fairly priced, P/S says it's a bit expensive compared to historical normals.
·1 päivä sittenWell, the question is whether one should continue to hold for dividend or, to twist the word, replace the stock....?- ·2 päivää sittenIn February, the Telenor share stood at 177 kr, now in June it stands at 145 kr per share. Admittedly, 5 kr has been paid out in dividends, but the share has performed very weakly. What is the reason for the fall?
·1 päivä sittenAn essential part especially for telecom companies must be restructuring and new thinking. It's nice with all the talk about Starlink etc., but then one must think new and create new needs and services. If one cannot manage this over time, one is dead. Telenor is a strong brand as of today. 
·10.6.Telenor pays 86 000 for each customer they have as of today. Does anyone have a thought on whether fiber optic network is a bit "old-fashioned" and/or expensive? Thinking then towards Starlink and similar. Not everyone needs super capacity and response time. Fear that Telenor might be forced into lower margins.
·1 päivä sitten · Muokattustarlink is shared bandwith, high delay and not useful for data business. you cannot compare that... and telenor has almost finished building out its fiber network in norway, so in the coming years it will reap the benefits from that. the rollout is almost there, we assume that norway is 90% built.. you don't have mobile without fiber, you have nothing without fiber.. or do you think mobile signals only travel through the air? capex to build starllink is way way way higher than what fiber will ever be.... and as said, not useful for anything other than private use. in 10 years, when capacity needs are doubled and more than that... good luck with satellites that are supposed to handle that... it's a dream, but that's typical elon... and fyi: the customers starlink has taken in so far, they have sold cheaply to..... they needed to make it look good before IPO!!!! but... it's interesting to see what people believe... we have tested starlink as an alternative for our customers... for b2b we have completely abandoned it..... b2b is where the money is, that's where the margins are... not on broadband...·1 päivä sittenThe problem with speed is that 1, it is shared so it is variable and 2: it is asymmetrical, so more down and little up.. yes, but remote areas have Telenor products for, WiFi broadband. So that is also solved. Problem 2 is delay, so RTT (round trip time) which is significantly higher than you get on both the other two I mention, and the last is 5G private networks which are under rapid development which is not possible via satellite (since it is not private) .. In my eyes, it is a supplement but can never be as good as what we have on the ground. And now we have only talked about mobile. If we take it to data networks, it is significantly quite unusable today. Companies (and many private individuals) want symmetrical bandwidth.. Then we can take the whole service part. Starlink is a website. You don't have any SLA there, project managers, service managers and everything else a company would require to purchase services. NOC, local installers etc etc… I don't know if it's v1, I wasn't involved myself but in those tests.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
53 päivää sitten
‧1 t 1 min
4,70 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 15.10.
6,59%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·3 t sittenI see that some are praising starlink. I, who have tried starlink in several places, think it's overpriced crap. For information, I used starlink in Sotra and Askøy in Western Norway. Clear view of the sky, followed all instructions. Ended up giving up on that stuff, incredibly bad speed compared to what you pay for. This was 1 year ago. Yes, Telenor is expensive, they squeeze everything they can from people. I see that as a big negative with Telenor. They are basically DNB, but in telecom. But compared to starlink, starlink is boss. At least at the current stage. I believe that the focus on the Nordics now will create more stable cash flows and margins than one could expect from Asia/Middle East. Yes, it is more expensive to acquire here in this country and more expensive to operate, but you get a much more stable group. Telenor's biggest problem is that they don't grow much, we hope these acquisitions lead to increased EPS. I see again and again that companies with sideways EPS usually end up falling significantly, because most investors want to invest in "up and to the right" graphs. I'm unsure about the stock price, P/E says it's fairly priced, P/S says it's a bit expensive compared to historical normals.
- ·1 päivä sittenWell, the question is whether one should continue to hold for dividend or, to twist the word, replace the stock....?
- ·2 päivää sittenIn February, the Telenor share stood at 177 kr, now in June it stands at 145 kr per share. Admittedly, 5 kr has been paid out in dividends, but the share has performed very weakly. What is the reason for the fall?·1 päivä sittenAn essential part especially for telecom companies must be restructuring and new thinking. It's nice with all the talk about Starlink etc., but then one must think new and create new needs and services. If one cannot manage this over time, one is dead. Telenor is a strong brand as of today.
- ·10.6.Telenor pays 86 000 for each customer they have as of today. Does anyone have a thought on whether fiber optic network is a bit "old-fashioned" and/or expensive? Thinking then towards Starlink and similar. Not everyone needs super capacity and response time. Fear that Telenor might be forced into lower margins.·1 päivä sitten · Muokattustarlink is shared bandwith, high delay and not useful for data business. you cannot compare that... and telenor has almost finished building out its fiber network in norway, so in the coming years it will reap the benefits from that. the rollout is almost there, we assume that norway is 90% built.. you don't have mobile without fiber, you have nothing without fiber.. or do you think mobile signals only travel through the air? capex to build starllink is way way way higher than what fiber will ever be.... and as said, not useful for anything other than private use. in 10 years, when capacity needs are doubled and more than that... good luck with satellites that are supposed to handle that... it's a dream, but that's typical elon... and fyi: the customers starlink has taken in so far, they have sold cheaply to..... they needed to make it look good before IPO!!!! but... it's interesting to see what people believe... we have tested starlink as an alternative for our customers... for b2b we have completely abandoned it..... b2b is where the money is, that's where the margins are... not on broadband...·1 päivä sittenThe problem with speed is that 1, it is shared so it is variable and 2: it is asymmetrical, so more down and little up.. yes, but remote areas have Telenor products for, WiFi broadband. So that is also solved. Problem 2 is delay, so RTT (round trip time) which is significantly higher than you get on both the other two I mention, and the last is 5G private networks which are under rapid development which is not possible via satellite (since it is not private) .. In my eyes, it is a supplement but can never be as good as what we have on the ground. And now we have only talked about mobile. If we take it to data networks, it is significantly quite unusable today. Companies (and many private individuals) want symmetrical bandwidth.. Then we can take the whole service part. Starlink is a website. You don't have any SLA there, project managers, service managers and everything else a company would require to purchase services. NOC, local installers etc etc… I don't know if it's v1, I wasn't involved myself but in those tests.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | - | - | ||
| 803 | - | - | ||
| 878 | - | - | ||
| 1 004 | - | - | ||
| 666 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 19.5. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.7.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
53 päivää sitten
‧1 t 1 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 19.5. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 18.7.2025 |
4,70 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 15.10.
6,59%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·3 t sittenI see that some are praising starlink. I, who have tried starlink in several places, think it's overpriced crap. For information, I used starlink in Sotra and Askøy in Western Norway. Clear view of the sky, followed all instructions. Ended up giving up on that stuff, incredibly bad speed compared to what you pay for. This was 1 year ago. Yes, Telenor is expensive, they squeeze everything they can from people. I see that as a big negative with Telenor. They are basically DNB, but in telecom. But compared to starlink, starlink is boss. At least at the current stage. I believe that the focus on the Nordics now will create more stable cash flows and margins than one could expect from Asia/Middle East. Yes, it is more expensive to acquire here in this country and more expensive to operate, but you get a much more stable group. Telenor's biggest problem is that they don't grow much, we hope these acquisitions lead to increased EPS. I see again and again that companies with sideways EPS usually end up falling significantly, because most investors want to invest in "up and to the right" graphs. I'm unsure about the stock price, P/E says it's fairly priced, P/S says it's a bit expensive compared to historical normals.
- ·1 päivä sittenWell, the question is whether one should continue to hold for dividend or, to twist the word, replace the stock....?
- ·2 päivää sittenIn February, the Telenor share stood at 177 kr, now in June it stands at 145 kr per share. Admittedly, 5 kr has been paid out in dividends, but the share has performed very weakly. What is the reason for the fall?·1 päivä sittenAn essential part especially for telecom companies must be restructuring and new thinking. It's nice with all the talk about Starlink etc., but then one must think new and create new needs and services. If one cannot manage this over time, one is dead. Telenor is a strong brand as of today.
- ·10.6.Telenor pays 86 000 for each customer they have as of today. Does anyone have a thought on whether fiber optic network is a bit "old-fashioned" and/or expensive? Thinking then towards Starlink and similar. Not everyone needs super capacity and response time. Fear that Telenor might be forced into lower margins.·1 päivä sitten · Muokattustarlink is shared bandwith, high delay and not useful for data business. you cannot compare that... and telenor has almost finished building out its fiber network in norway, so in the coming years it will reap the benefits from that. the rollout is almost there, we assume that norway is 90% built.. you don't have mobile without fiber, you have nothing without fiber.. or do you think mobile signals only travel through the air? capex to build starllink is way way way higher than what fiber will ever be.... and as said, not useful for anything other than private use. in 10 years, when capacity needs are doubled and more than that... good luck with satellites that are supposed to handle that... it's a dream, but that's typical elon... and fyi: the customers starlink has taken in so far, they have sold cheaply to..... they needed to make it look good before IPO!!!! but... it's interesting to see what people believe... we have tested starlink as an alternative for our customers... for b2b we have completely abandoned it..... b2b is where the money is, that's where the margins are... not on broadband...·1 päivä sittenThe problem with speed is that 1, it is shared so it is variable and 2: it is asymmetrical, so more down and little up.. yes, but remote areas have Telenor products for, WiFi broadband. So that is also solved. Problem 2 is delay, so RTT (round trip time) which is significantly higher than you get on both the other two I mention, and the last is 5G private networks which are under rapid development which is not possible via satellite (since it is not private) .. In my eyes, it is a supplement but can never be as good as what we have on the ground. And now we have only talked about mobile. If we take it to data networks, it is significantly quite unusable today. Companies (and many private individuals) want symmetrical bandwidth.. Then we can take the whole service part. Starlink is a website. You don't have any SLA there, project managers, service managers and everything else a company would require to purchase services. NOC, local installers etc etc… I don't know if it's v1, I wasn't involved myself but in those tests.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | - | - | ||
| 803 | - | - | ||
| 878 | - | - | ||
| 1 004 | - | - | ||
| 666 | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt