2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
1 päivä sitten
‧1 t 1 min
4,70 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 15.10.
7,48%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 19.5. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·20 min sittenOverpaid, cumbersome management and foolish investments abroad. I have sold everything now. Good luck.
·1 t sitten16 insider purchases this week, Pareto upgrades to buy 150 and Danske Bank buy 157🙂
·1 t sittenQuestion to Chat gpt : Question whether satellites will take over for broadband on Earth or is it something similar to how satellites and satellite dishes did not take over for cable TV / broadband ? Answer : Yes, that is actually a pretty good comparison. Many believe that satellite internet will replace fiber and regular broadband, but it is likely that the two technologies will complement each other – much like satellite TV never completely took over for cable TV. Here's why: * Fiber is superior where it exists. Fiber has very high capacity, low latency (latency) and can handle enormous amounts of data. In densely populated areas, it is difficult to compete with this. * Satellite is superior where fiber is expensive or impossible. Services like Starlink make it possible to get fast internet in the mountains, at sea or in sparsely populated areas without digging cables. It resembles the development of TV: * Satellite TV gave many access to TV where cable did not exist. * Cable TV (and later fiber) was often more stable and could deliver more services. * Ultimately, internet-based streaming took over much of the TV market, not satellite.
I copied your question into mistral.ai. Here are some answers. This is a very relevant question, and there is much to suggest that satellites will not completely take over from traditional broadband on Earth – in the same way that satellite dishes never completely replaced cable TV or fiber broadband. Here are some key points to understand why: 1. Technological limitations Latency (delay): Satellite internet (e.g., Starlink, OneWeb) has higher latency than fiber or cable, because the signal has to travel up to the satellite and back. This is critical for applications like gaming, video calls, or real-time financial transactions. Starlink: ~20–50 ms (low in a satellite context, but still higher than fiber). Fiber: 1–10 ms. Bandwidth and capacity: Satellites have limited capacity compared to fiber. While fiber can deliver symmetric 1 Gbps+ to each household, satellites share bandwidth across many users in an area, which can lead to bottlenecks in densely populated areas. Weather and physical obstructions: Satellite connections can be affected by weather (e.g., rain, snow) and physical obstructions (e.g., trees, buildings). Fiber is immune to this. Economy and infrastructure Cost: Satellite internet is more expensive to operate per user than fiber. While Starlink has reduced costs, it is still not competitive with fiber in the long term for the mass market. Example: Starlink costs ~100–150 USD/month + equipment (~600 USD). Fiber in Norway often costs 300–600 NOK/month with higher speed. Infrastructure investments: Fiber and cable TV are already built out in densely populated areas, and it is costly to replace this. Satellites, however, are ideal for remote areas where fiber is not profitable.
·4 t sittenNew insider purchase today. Insider purchases totaling 2.8 mill NOK yesterday and today. https://innsidehandel.no/selskap/TEL
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
1 päivä sitten
‧1 t 1 min
4,70 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 15.10.
7,48%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·20 min sittenOverpaid, cumbersome management and foolish investments abroad. I have sold everything now. Good luck.
- ·1 t sitten16 insider purchases this week, Pareto upgrades to buy 150 and Danske Bank buy 157🙂
- ·1 t sittenQuestion to Chat gpt : Question whether satellites will take over for broadband on Earth or is it something similar to how satellites and satellite dishes did not take over for cable TV / broadband ? Answer : Yes, that is actually a pretty good comparison. Many believe that satellite internet will replace fiber and regular broadband, but it is likely that the two technologies will complement each other – much like satellite TV never completely took over for cable TV. Here's why: * Fiber is superior where it exists. Fiber has very high capacity, low latency (latency) and can handle enormous amounts of data. In densely populated areas, it is difficult to compete with this. * Satellite is superior where fiber is expensive or impossible. Services like Starlink make it possible to get fast internet in the mountains, at sea or in sparsely populated areas without digging cables. It resembles the development of TV: * Satellite TV gave many access to TV where cable did not exist. * Cable TV (and later fiber) was often more stable and could deliver more services. * Ultimately, internet-based streaming took over much of the TV market, not satellite.I copied your question into mistral.ai. Here are some answers. This is a very relevant question, and there is much to suggest that satellites will not completely take over from traditional broadband on Earth – in the same way that satellite dishes never completely replaced cable TV or fiber broadband. Here are some key points to understand why: 1. Technological limitations Latency (delay): Satellite internet (e.g., Starlink, OneWeb) has higher latency than fiber or cable, because the signal has to travel up to the satellite and back. This is critical for applications like gaming, video calls, or real-time financial transactions. Starlink: ~20–50 ms (low in a satellite context, but still higher than fiber). Fiber: 1–10 ms. Bandwidth and capacity: Satellites have limited capacity compared to fiber. While fiber can deliver symmetric 1 Gbps+ to each household, satellites share bandwidth across many users in an area, which can lead to bottlenecks in densely populated areas. Weather and physical obstructions: Satellite connections can be affected by weather (e.g., rain, snow) and physical obstructions (e.g., trees, buildings). Fiber is immune to this. Economy and infrastructure Cost: Satellite internet is more expensive to operate per user than fiber. While Starlink has reduced costs, it is still not competitive with fiber in the long term for the mass market. Example: Starlink costs ~100–150 USD/month + equipment (~600 USD). Fiber in Norway often costs 300–600 NOK/month with higher speed. Infrastructure investments: Fiber and cable TV are already built out in densely populated areas, and it is costly to replace this. Satellites, however, are ideal for remote areas where fiber is not profitable.
- ·4 t sittenNew insider purchase today. Insider purchases totaling 2.8 mill NOK yesterday and today. https://innsidehandel.no/selskap/TEL
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 19.5. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
1 päivä sitten
‧1 t 1 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 28.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 16.7. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 19.5. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 28.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 6.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 29.10.2025 |
4,70 NOK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 15.10.
7,48%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·20 min sittenOverpaid, cumbersome management and foolish investments abroad. I have sold everything now. Good luck.
- ·1 t sitten16 insider purchases this week, Pareto upgrades to buy 150 and Danske Bank buy 157🙂
- ·1 t sittenQuestion to Chat gpt : Question whether satellites will take over for broadband on Earth or is it something similar to how satellites and satellite dishes did not take over for cable TV / broadband ? Answer : Yes, that is actually a pretty good comparison. Many believe that satellite internet will replace fiber and regular broadband, but it is likely that the two technologies will complement each other – much like satellite TV never completely took over for cable TV. Here's why: * Fiber is superior where it exists. Fiber has very high capacity, low latency (latency) and can handle enormous amounts of data. In densely populated areas, it is difficult to compete with this. * Satellite is superior where fiber is expensive or impossible. Services like Starlink make it possible to get fast internet in the mountains, at sea or in sparsely populated areas without digging cables. It resembles the development of TV: * Satellite TV gave many access to TV where cable did not exist. * Cable TV (and later fiber) was often more stable and could deliver more services. * Ultimately, internet-based streaming took over much of the TV market, not satellite.I copied your question into mistral.ai. Here are some answers. This is a very relevant question, and there is much to suggest that satellites will not completely take over from traditional broadband on Earth – in the same way that satellite dishes never completely replaced cable TV or fiber broadband. Here are some key points to understand why: 1. Technological limitations Latency (delay): Satellite internet (e.g., Starlink, OneWeb) has higher latency than fiber or cable, because the signal has to travel up to the satellite and back. This is critical for applications like gaming, video calls, or real-time financial transactions. Starlink: ~20–50 ms (low in a satellite context, but still higher than fiber). Fiber: 1–10 ms. Bandwidth and capacity: Satellites have limited capacity compared to fiber. While fiber can deliver symmetric 1 Gbps+ to each household, satellites share bandwidth across many users in an area, which can lead to bottlenecks in densely populated areas. Weather and physical obstructions: Satellite connections can be affected by weather (e.g., rain, snow) and physical obstructions (e.g., trees, buildings). Fiber is immune to this. Economy and infrastructure Cost: Satellite internet is more expensive to operate per user than fiber. While Starlink has reduced costs, it is still not competitive with fiber in the long term for the mass market. Example: Starlink costs ~100–150 USD/month + equipment (~600 USD). Fiber in Norway often costs 300–600 NOK/month with higher speed. Infrastructure investments: Fiber and cable TV are already built out in densely populated areas, and it is costly to replace this. Satellites, however, are ideal for remote areas where fiber is not profitable.
- ·4 t sittenNew insider purchase today. Insider purchases totaling 2.8 mill NOK yesterday and today. https://innsidehandel.no/selskap/TEL
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt