2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
41 päivää sitten
‧56 min
1,20 SEK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 5.10.
0,34%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 23.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 1.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·4 t sittenWhy doesn't Denmark buy Swedish planes and other gear? usa is more and more, I believe, intent on splitting cohesion and cooperation with Nato EU and f.eks. democracies like Ukraine. The day we need to use the F35 plane for combat, we might risk as defense perhaps Greenland, then they have pressed the black button so the stuff doesn't work. He has said he doesn't care about the EU, now he's pissing Canada off again. He sits and plays Risk with Putin, that doesn't work.
·5 t sittenThe Barracuda system – one of the least spectacular elements in Saab's product portfolio – has the potential to become a real revenue driver in the future. A latest-generation combat vehicle – say CV90 Mk IV – costs ≈ 130 million SEK. Then it's obviously crazy not to equip it with multispectral camouflage, which reduces both visual and IR signature. The experiences from Ukraine are crystal clear: Both people and machines of all kinds will need this type of signature-reducing camo. For some armed forces, the seasons will also require more sets (woodland/forest green works almost as poorly in winter as winter camo when there is no snow). Expect sales. - - - - The agreement with Holland contains no financial information. But based on what I've heard before (a rough estimate per vehicle), it's not small change. Everything is custom-fitted for each vehicle type. The sources are so uncertain that I do not intend to spread the figure further. But it is a seven-figure amount per vehicle.
·1 päivä sittenSaab, Canada and the Arctic NATO track Wish Saab was Norwegian, but as a shareholder I'd rather hope that Trump continues to make life difficult for Canada. F-35's strengths Best integration with NORAD and USA. Militarily the strongest solution and chosen by many NATO countries. Canada seems in practice to be tied to up to around 30 F-35s through ordered aircraft and payments for components for more aircraft. Saab's strengths Lower operating and maintenance costs. Can operate from simpler and more dispersed bases. Greater industrial cooperation, technology transfer and jobs in Canada. Already chosen as supplier of GlobalEye surveillance aircraft to Canada. Sweden is now a NATO member, which opens for closer defense integration. Saab is developing unmanned companion aircraft for Gripen, which in the long term can provide industrial partnerships and access to next-generation air combat systems. The politicians' biggest dilemma How to reduce dependence on the USA without weakening NORAD cooperation or defense capability. A compromise with, for example, 50 F-35s and 50 Gripens can therefore be the least risky political solution. Canada retains a strong F-35 capability, while Saab contributes jobs, industrial development and greater strategic freedom of action. This is not a public plan, but a possible scenario based on current developments. For Saab investors, therefore, the most interesting outcome is not that Gripen replaces F-35, but that Canada chooses Gripen in addition to F-35. In recent years, Canada has shown a clear preference for solutions that combine NATO integration, European cooperation and national industrial development. The country has chosen the British Type 26 design as the basis for 15 new surface ships being built in Canada, chosen the 212CD submarine in cooperation with Norway and Germany, and chosen Saab GlobalEye. The question is whether the fighter jet acquisition will be the next example of the same pattern. The pattern seems clear: Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Canada and the United Kingdom are increasingly coordinating capabilities, sensors and defense industry. Focus on the Arctic, the North Atlantic and the GIUK gap drives more cooperation and standardization. A larger Canadian F-35 fleet can also provide more opportunities for Kongsberg through integrated missile systems on the F-35 platform. At the same time, a Gripen choice can further strengthen European defense industrial cooperation. Personally, I also believe that Norway should consider 15-30 Gripens as a supplement to F-35 for patrol, sovereignty, and presence missions in the north, including operations from short-runway airfields in Finnmark. In addition, 2-3 GlobalEye aircraft could give Norway its own capability for monitoring the GIUK gap and the northern areas. That NATO acquires its own surveillance aircraft does not necessarily mean that these will always be available when Norwegian needs arise. In short: Canada has already chosen European solutions for submarines, surface ships and air surveillance. If the country also ends up with a combination of F-35 and Gripen, it will fit into a pattern where NATO integration, European cooperation and national industrial development go hand in hand. For Saab, it could be far more valuable than a pure fighter jet contract.
Reminds that Carney is to meet the EU leadership soon. Canada is approaching a comprehensive trade agreement with the EU and some are even talking about membership. Regardless, extensive arms contrskters are likely to kcome forward and it is quite possible that important signings will take place in September. Norway and Germany have already received the submarine contracrn and we have received a contract for JSM. Canada is building frigates of a class very similar to our type26. Gripen/GlobalEye is well positioned to be next.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
41 päivää sitten
‧56 min
1,20 SEK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 5.10.
0,34%Tuotto/v
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sittenWhy doesn't Denmark buy Swedish planes and other gear? usa is more and more, I believe, intent on splitting cohesion and cooperation with Nato EU and f.eks. democracies like Ukraine. The day we need to use the F35 plane for combat, we might risk as defense perhaps Greenland, then they have pressed the black button so the stuff doesn't work. He has said he doesn't care about the EU, now he's pissing Canada off again. He sits and plays Risk with Putin, that doesn't work.
- ·5 t sittenThe Barracuda system – one of the least spectacular elements in Saab's product portfolio – has the potential to become a real revenue driver in the future. A latest-generation combat vehicle – say CV90 Mk IV – costs ≈ 130 million SEK. Then it's obviously crazy not to equip it with multispectral camouflage, which reduces both visual and IR signature. The experiences from Ukraine are crystal clear: Both people and machines of all kinds will need this type of signature-reducing camo. For some armed forces, the seasons will also require more sets (woodland/forest green works almost as poorly in winter as winter camo when there is no snow). Expect sales. - - - - The agreement with Holland contains no financial information. But based on what I've heard before (a rough estimate per vehicle), it's not small change. Everything is custom-fitted for each vehicle type. The sources are so uncertain that I do not intend to spread the figure further. But it is a seven-figure amount per vehicle.
- ·1 päivä sittenSaab, Canada and the Arctic NATO track Wish Saab was Norwegian, but as a shareholder I'd rather hope that Trump continues to make life difficult for Canada. F-35's strengths Best integration with NORAD and USA. Militarily the strongest solution and chosen by many NATO countries. Canada seems in practice to be tied to up to around 30 F-35s through ordered aircraft and payments for components for more aircraft. Saab's strengths Lower operating and maintenance costs. Can operate from simpler and more dispersed bases. Greater industrial cooperation, technology transfer and jobs in Canada. Already chosen as supplier of GlobalEye surveillance aircraft to Canada. Sweden is now a NATO member, which opens for closer defense integration. Saab is developing unmanned companion aircraft for Gripen, which in the long term can provide industrial partnerships and access to next-generation air combat systems. The politicians' biggest dilemma How to reduce dependence on the USA without weakening NORAD cooperation or defense capability. A compromise with, for example, 50 F-35s and 50 Gripens can therefore be the least risky political solution. Canada retains a strong F-35 capability, while Saab contributes jobs, industrial development and greater strategic freedom of action. This is not a public plan, but a possible scenario based on current developments. For Saab investors, therefore, the most interesting outcome is not that Gripen replaces F-35, but that Canada chooses Gripen in addition to F-35. In recent years, Canada has shown a clear preference for solutions that combine NATO integration, European cooperation and national industrial development. The country has chosen the British Type 26 design as the basis for 15 new surface ships being built in Canada, chosen the 212CD submarine in cooperation with Norway and Germany, and chosen Saab GlobalEye. The question is whether the fighter jet acquisition will be the next example of the same pattern. The pattern seems clear: Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Canada and the United Kingdom are increasingly coordinating capabilities, sensors and defense industry. Focus on the Arctic, the North Atlantic and the GIUK gap drives more cooperation and standardization. A larger Canadian F-35 fleet can also provide more opportunities for Kongsberg through integrated missile systems on the F-35 platform. At the same time, a Gripen choice can further strengthen European defense industrial cooperation. Personally, I also believe that Norway should consider 15-30 Gripens as a supplement to F-35 for patrol, sovereignty, and presence missions in the north, including operations from short-runway airfields in Finnmark. In addition, 2-3 GlobalEye aircraft could give Norway its own capability for monitoring the GIUK gap and the northern areas. That NATO acquires its own surveillance aircraft does not necessarily mean that these will always be available when Norwegian needs arise. In short: Canada has already chosen European solutions for submarines, surface ships and air surveillance. If the country also ends up with a combination of F-35 and Gripen, it will fit into a pattern where NATO integration, European cooperation and national industrial development go hand in hand. For Saab, it could be far more valuable than a pure fighter jet contract.Reminds that Carney is to meet the EU leadership soon. Canada is approaching a comprehensive trade agreement with the EU and some are even talking about membership. Regardless, extensive arms contrskters are likely to kcome forward and it is quite possible that important signings will take place in September. Norway and Germany have already received the submarine contracrn and we have received a contract for JSM. Canada is building frigates of a class very similar to our type26. Gripen/GlobalEye is well positioned to be next.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 23.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 1.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
41 päivää sitten
‧56 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 23.10. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 17.7. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 23.4. | ||
Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2026 1.4. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 5.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 24.10.2025 |
1,20 SEK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 5.10.
0,34%Tuotto/v
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·4 t sittenWhy doesn't Denmark buy Swedish planes and other gear? usa is more and more, I believe, intent on splitting cohesion and cooperation with Nato EU and f.eks. democracies like Ukraine. The day we need to use the F35 plane for combat, we might risk as defense perhaps Greenland, then they have pressed the black button so the stuff doesn't work. He has said he doesn't care about the EU, now he's pissing Canada off again. He sits and plays Risk with Putin, that doesn't work.
- ·5 t sittenThe Barracuda system – one of the least spectacular elements in Saab's product portfolio – has the potential to become a real revenue driver in the future. A latest-generation combat vehicle – say CV90 Mk IV – costs ≈ 130 million SEK. Then it's obviously crazy not to equip it with multispectral camouflage, which reduces both visual and IR signature. The experiences from Ukraine are crystal clear: Both people and machines of all kinds will need this type of signature-reducing camo. For some armed forces, the seasons will also require more sets (woodland/forest green works almost as poorly in winter as winter camo when there is no snow). Expect sales. - - - - The agreement with Holland contains no financial information. But based on what I've heard before (a rough estimate per vehicle), it's not small change. Everything is custom-fitted for each vehicle type. The sources are so uncertain that I do not intend to spread the figure further. But it is a seven-figure amount per vehicle.
- ·1 päivä sittenSaab, Canada and the Arctic NATO track Wish Saab was Norwegian, but as a shareholder I'd rather hope that Trump continues to make life difficult for Canada. F-35's strengths Best integration with NORAD and USA. Militarily the strongest solution and chosen by many NATO countries. Canada seems in practice to be tied to up to around 30 F-35s through ordered aircraft and payments for components for more aircraft. Saab's strengths Lower operating and maintenance costs. Can operate from simpler and more dispersed bases. Greater industrial cooperation, technology transfer and jobs in Canada. Already chosen as supplier of GlobalEye surveillance aircraft to Canada. Sweden is now a NATO member, which opens for closer defense integration. Saab is developing unmanned companion aircraft for Gripen, which in the long term can provide industrial partnerships and access to next-generation air combat systems. The politicians' biggest dilemma How to reduce dependence on the USA without weakening NORAD cooperation or defense capability. A compromise with, for example, 50 F-35s and 50 Gripens can therefore be the least risky political solution. Canada retains a strong F-35 capability, while Saab contributes jobs, industrial development and greater strategic freedom of action. This is not a public plan, but a possible scenario based on current developments. For Saab investors, therefore, the most interesting outcome is not that Gripen replaces F-35, but that Canada chooses Gripen in addition to F-35. In recent years, Canada has shown a clear preference for solutions that combine NATO integration, European cooperation and national industrial development. The country has chosen the British Type 26 design as the basis for 15 new surface ships being built in Canada, chosen the 212CD submarine in cooperation with Norway and Germany, and chosen Saab GlobalEye. The question is whether the fighter jet acquisition will be the next example of the same pattern. The pattern seems clear: Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Canada and the United Kingdom are increasingly coordinating capabilities, sensors and defense industry. Focus on the Arctic, the North Atlantic and the GIUK gap drives more cooperation and standardization. A larger Canadian F-35 fleet can also provide more opportunities for Kongsberg through integrated missile systems on the F-35 platform. At the same time, a Gripen choice can further strengthen European defense industrial cooperation. Personally, I also believe that Norway should consider 15-30 Gripens as a supplement to F-35 for patrol, sovereignty, and presence missions in the north, including operations from short-runway airfields in Finnmark. In addition, 2-3 GlobalEye aircraft could give Norway its own capability for monitoring the GIUK gap and the northern areas. That NATO acquires its own surveillance aircraft does not necessarily mean that these will always be available when Norwegian needs arise. In short: Canada has already chosen European solutions for submarines, surface ships and air surveillance. If the country also ends up with a combination of F-35 and Gripen, it will fit into a pattern where NATO integration, European cooperation and national industrial development go hand in hand. For Saab, it could be far more valuable than a pure fighter jet contract.Reminds that Carney is to meet the EU leadership soon. Canada is approaching a comprehensive trade agreement with the EU and some are even talking about membership. Regardless, extensive arms contrskters are likely to kcome forward and it is quite possible that important signings will take place in September. Norway and Germany have already received the submarine contracrn and we have received a contract for JSM. Canada is building frigates of a class very similar to our type26. Gripen/GlobalEye is well positioned to be next.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt