2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten57 min
2,40 SEK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 1.4.
0,31%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Stockholm
Määrä
Osto
494 541
Myynti
Määrä
492 573
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | - | - | ||
| 138 | - | - | ||
| 481 | - | - | ||
| 561 | - | - | ||
| 815 | - | - |
Ylin
670,8VWAP
Alin
637,7VaihtoMäärä
1 745,4 2 654 381
VWAP
Ylin
670,8Alin
637,7VaihtoMäärä
1 745,4 2 654 381
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 -tulosraportti | 23.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. | |
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 24.10.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 18.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 25.4.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 10.4.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenWhat do you say? Will the USA and Israel attack Iran? If so, when do you think it will happen? The USA has flown a lot of defense material to the Middle East, to scare or to be used?
·9 t sittenYou've put your finger on the clearest clue: All resources moved to the Persian Gulf, or the region around it. Own speculations follow (warning – long post): If the USA just wanted to make a statement, it would have been comparatively easy to fly down half a dozen B-2 Spirit from the base in Missouri and let them turn the Revolutionary Guard's bases and some of the facilities where they work on the Iranian nuclear weapons program* into rubble. This happened in June 2025 (Midnight Hammer). What has been done now is that: - a lot of very exclusive capabilities have been moved to the area (e.g. EW, nuke sniffer, SIGINT, as well as tanker aircraft and support functions/vessels. - air defense has been reinforced at a number of locations (air and naval bases) that the mullahs could hit with a missile, to avenge an American attack. Above all, the latter has taken a long time. Even the first movements were delayed when the eastern USA was hit by terrible weather. - - - The answer to the question 'What will happen?' can be found in things that don't make headlines. Look for reports/RUMINT regarding e.g. support vessels. Aircraft carriers and submarines can, as is well known, operate for years with the nuclear fuel they have on board, but an American destroyer drinks diesel and needs replenishment every third day to be a relevant resource (three destroyers are specifically assigned to CSG Abraham Lincoln). In addition, 7500 sailors and pilots need to eat and drink, which requires replenishment ≈ every 5-7 days, according to various online sources. - - - Spoke with Iran today (via detours and proxies – my friends mean that all communications are intercepted, and no one wants a visit from the IRGC). There is a deceptive calm there, as the large protests have been put down with rarely seen brutality. The Persian people are (rightly) really pissed at HM King Donald I, who on January 13 posted “Help is on the way” to those who protested. That was three weeks ago. How many human lives were needlessly wasted because of this, future historians will argue about. Conducting foreign policy via Truth Social is – in short – extremely reckless. In Iran, people are now talking about 'the other boat', which means they are speculating whether CSG George H W Bush is heading east. An article in Forbes mentioned this on January 21, and fueled rumors that the USA wanted to reinforce its presence in the Mediterranean = have an additional 50-80 cutting-edge aircraft ready for operations against Iran. So far, nothing suggests that it has crossed the Atlantic – and an aircraft carrier group cannot pass Gibraltar without making headlines... Iranian reports claim that the regime was willing to negotiate and even give up weapons-grade plutonium, but rumor-mongering among my Persian friends is intense right now, so it's best not to jump to conclusions. - - - However... All unglamorous data (concerning logistics etc.) at least tells me that an attack is reasonably imminent. But I thought that two weeks ago too... - - - *yes, I know that several of the Iranian facilities are deep inside mountains. However, it is possible to damage the operations, which was the effect of the operation on June 22 last year.·8 t sittenJust minutes after I posted the long rant above, I stumble upon this post on Twitter. It's a translation of a post by a Persian analyst, Shanin Moddares. I think he has some points... ”Military Analysis of the Region The United States, together with Israel, is planning a long-term military campaign against Iran; based on the initial assumption that the Iranian regime will, in response, target Israel and American bases across the Middle East. At present, there are at least 19 major U.S. bases and strategic command centers in the region, including: - Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar (CENTCOM headquarters) - The U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain - Camp Arifjan in Kuwait - As well as bases in Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and various Gulf countries. The critical point is that not all of these bases are equipped with permanent air defense systems. Some only have short-range defensive systems that are effectively useless against ballistic missiles. The large-scale deployment of THAAD and Patriot systems indicates that the Americans are preparing to provide missile defense coverage for nearly all of these bases. On the other hand, it is expected that the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln will be positioned off the coast of Oman (black dot). To protect it, air defense systems have even been deployed in the United Arab Emirates (route marked in red). The F-15 fighters stationed in Jordan and the British F-35s in Cyprus are not configured for offensive operations; their primary mission is to defend Israel against Iranian loitering munitions such as the Shahed-131/136. The key point here is: Logistics, coordination, and integration of such an extensive network of advanced systems take considerable time — and this process is still ongoing. This delay does not mean Trump has changed his mind; contrary to what many commentators, media outlets, journalists, and pseudo-analysts are trying to suggest. The puzzle is still being completed.” https://x.com/Eyalo365/status/2020121859694444580?s=20- ·1 päivä sittenOne doesn't put in this much work if one doesn't believe one has a good chance:) In a call with investors today Saab CEO Micael Johansson claimed Canada was considering ways “not to be too dependent on the US by having a dual fleet, both F-35 and the Gripens.” “We are providing all [the] detailed information that they need to understand,” he said. Specifically, the Swedish manufacturer has shared details around speed of technology transfer and “how quickly” it could stand up a local Gripen production facility. Johansson also suggested that, should a deal be completed, the manufacturing site will play host to future Gripen export aircraft. https://breakingdefense.com/2026/02/saab-shares-detailed-information-on-gripen-with-canada-as-part-of-dual-fleet-pitch/·1 päivä sittenI believe the dual fleet reasoning is what will ultimately prevail. The different cutting-edge aircraft systems complement each other. Speculation: - Canada places an additional order for ≈ 25 aircraft from Lockheed Martin. It would then get an F-35 fleet of almost the same size as Denmark, or Belgium. Excellent for air superiority or operations within the framework of the alliance. - The remaining 45-47 aircraft will be Gripen E/F. They will do the heavy lifting (air patrolling and incident readiness) in an excellent and cost-effective way. Add half a dozen GlobalEye and Canada has – given that it procures relevant weapons to equip them with – a potent, updated, and useful air defense. Four effects are achieved: - 1. Economies of scale regarding maintenance and updates for the 16 aircraft already ordered and paid for. In short, it becomes a slightly better deal, as costs for pilot training, spare parts, integration into the Canadian air defense, etc., are spread across more units. - 2. Independence vis-à-vis USA is marked in practical action, not just in well-formulated phrases in Davos. - 3. Better economics and higher availability of the aircraft fleet (the F-35 system's maintenance needs are sky-high). - 4. A more versatile air defense. The systems are good at different things – they complement each other. All this happens independently of the positive effects resulting from Saab's sweetened offer regarding production in Canada, technology transfer, etc. Carney has been remarkably clear on the issue of national independence. It is no longer political hot air, but an established and adopted strategy. It is said that Saab has an ≈ 40 percent chance of getting a contract signed with Canada. In my world, the chance is now greater than that: Canada must hedge because USA's next president could be J D Vance.
·1 päivä sittenHow can one decide on the dividend already now (3.60/share)? Isn't that done at the annual general meeting?
·1 päivä sittenWhat use do we have for the analysts?? They arrive long after the price has gone up and settled at a rather stable level, and then their target prices are often well below. It's not that hard to set such target prices. All of us on this forum can do that too, and if not, even better! So what damn use do we have for them?? I, however, have never had any use for them! I rather think they have a negative manipulative effect on the price because they are always below! (at least on the Saab stock)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten57 min
2,40 SEK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 1.4.
0,31%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenWhat do you say? Will the USA and Israel attack Iran? If so, when do you think it will happen? The USA has flown a lot of defense material to the Middle East, to scare or to be used?·9 t sittenYou've put your finger on the clearest clue: All resources moved to the Persian Gulf, or the region around it. Own speculations follow (warning – long post): If the USA just wanted to make a statement, it would have been comparatively easy to fly down half a dozen B-2 Spirit from the base in Missouri and let them turn the Revolutionary Guard's bases and some of the facilities where they work on the Iranian nuclear weapons program* into rubble. This happened in June 2025 (Midnight Hammer). What has been done now is that: - a lot of very exclusive capabilities have been moved to the area (e.g. EW, nuke sniffer, SIGINT, as well as tanker aircraft and support functions/vessels. - air defense has been reinforced at a number of locations (air and naval bases) that the mullahs could hit with a missile, to avenge an American attack. Above all, the latter has taken a long time. Even the first movements were delayed when the eastern USA was hit by terrible weather. - - - The answer to the question 'What will happen?' can be found in things that don't make headlines. Look for reports/RUMINT regarding e.g. support vessels. Aircraft carriers and submarines can, as is well known, operate for years with the nuclear fuel they have on board, but an American destroyer drinks diesel and needs replenishment every third day to be a relevant resource (three destroyers are specifically assigned to CSG Abraham Lincoln). In addition, 7500 sailors and pilots need to eat and drink, which requires replenishment ≈ every 5-7 days, according to various online sources. - - - Spoke with Iran today (via detours and proxies – my friends mean that all communications are intercepted, and no one wants a visit from the IRGC). There is a deceptive calm there, as the large protests have been put down with rarely seen brutality. The Persian people are (rightly) really pissed at HM King Donald I, who on January 13 posted “Help is on the way” to those who protested. That was three weeks ago. How many human lives were needlessly wasted because of this, future historians will argue about. Conducting foreign policy via Truth Social is – in short – extremely reckless. In Iran, people are now talking about 'the other boat', which means they are speculating whether CSG George H W Bush is heading east. An article in Forbes mentioned this on January 21, and fueled rumors that the USA wanted to reinforce its presence in the Mediterranean = have an additional 50-80 cutting-edge aircraft ready for operations against Iran. So far, nothing suggests that it has crossed the Atlantic – and an aircraft carrier group cannot pass Gibraltar without making headlines... Iranian reports claim that the regime was willing to negotiate and even give up weapons-grade plutonium, but rumor-mongering among my Persian friends is intense right now, so it's best not to jump to conclusions. - - - However... All unglamorous data (concerning logistics etc.) at least tells me that an attack is reasonably imminent. But I thought that two weeks ago too... - - - *yes, I know that several of the Iranian facilities are deep inside mountains. However, it is possible to damage the operations, which was the effect of the operation on June 22 last year.·8 t sittenJust minutes after I posted the long rant above, I stumble upon this post on Twitter. It's a translation of a post by a Persian analyst, Shanin Moddares. I think he has some points... ”Military Analysis of the Region The United States, together with Israel, is planning a long-term military campaign against Iran; based on the initial assumption that the Iranian regime will, in response, target Israel and American bases across the Middle East. At present, there are at least 19 major U.S. bases and strategic command centers in the region, including: - Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar (CENTCOM headquarters) - The U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain - Camp Arifjan in Kuwait - As well as bases in Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and various Gulf countries. The critical point is that not all of these bases are equipped with permanent air defense systems. Some only have short-range defensive systems that are effectively useless against ballistic missiles. The large-scale deployment of THAAD and Patriot systems indicates that the Americans are preparing to provide missile defense coverage for nearly all of these bases. On the other hand, it is expected that the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln will be positioned off the coast of Oman (black dot). To protect it, air defense systems have even been deployed in the United Arab Emirates (route marked in red). The F-15 fighters stationed in Jordan and the British F-35s in Cyprus are not configured for offensive operations; their primary mission is to defend Israel against Iranian loitering munitions such as the Shahed-131/136. The key point here is: Logistics, coordination, and integration of such an extensive network of advanced systems take considerable time — and this process is still ongoing. This delay does not mean Trump has changed his mind; contrary to what many commentators, media outlets, journalists, and pseudo-analysts are trying to suggest. The puzzle is still being completed.” https://x.com/Eyalo365/status/2020121859694444580?s=20
- ·1 päivä sittenOne doesn't put in this much work if one doesn't believe one has a good chance:) In a call with investors today Saab CEO Micael Johansson claimed Canada was considering ways “not to be too dependent on the US by having a dual fleet, both F-35 and the Gripens.” “We are providing all [the] detailed information that they need to understand,” he said. Specifically, the Swedish manufacturer has shared details around speed of technology transfer and “how quickly” it could stand up a local Gripen production facility. Johansson also suggested that, should a deal be completed, the manufacturing site will play host to future Gripen export aircraft. https://breakingdefense.com/2026/02/saab-shares-detailed-information-on-gripen-with-canada-as-part-of-dual-fleet-pitch/·1 päivä sittenI believe the dual fleet reasoning is what will ultimately prevail. The different cutting-edge aircraft systems complement each other. Speculation: - Canada places an additional order for ≈ 25 aircraft from Lockheed Martin. It would then get an F-35 fleet of almost the same size as Denmark, or Belgium. Excellent for air superiority or operations within the framework of the alliance. - The remaining 45-47 aircraft will be Gripen E/F. They will do the heavy lifting (air patrolling and incident readiness) in an excellent and cost-effective way. Add half a dozen GlobalEye and Canada has – given that it procures relevant weapons to equip them with – a potent, updated, and useful air defense. Four effects are achieved: - 1. Economies of scale regarding maintenance and updates for the 16 aircraft already ordered and paid for. In short, it becomes a slightly better deal, as costs for pilot training, spare parts, integration into the Canadian air defense, etc., are spread across more units. - 2. Independence vis-à-vis USA is marked in practical action, not just in well-formulated phrases in Davos. - 3. Better economics and higher availability of the aircraft fleet (the F-35 system's maintenance needs are sky-high). - 4. A more versatile air defense. The systems are good at different things – they complement each other. All this happens independently of the positive effects resulting from Saab's sweetened offer regarding production in Canada, technology transfer, etc. Carney has been remarkably clear on the issue of national independence. It is no longer political hot air, but an established and adopted strategy. It is said that Saab has an ≈ 40 percent chance of getting a contract signed with Canada. In my world, the chance is now greater than that: Canada must hedge because USA's next president could be J D Vance.
- ·1 päivä sittenHow can one decide on the dividend already now (3.60/share)? Isn't that done at the annual general meeting?
- ·1 päivä sittenWhat use do we have for the analysts?? They arrive long after the price has gone up and settled at a rather stable level, and then their target prices are often well below. It's not that hard to set such target prices. All of us on this forum can do that too, and if not, even better! So what damn use do we have for them?? I, however, have never had any use for them! I rather think they have a negative manipulative effect on the price because they are always below! (at least on the Saab stock)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Stockholm
Määrä
Osto
494 541
Myynti
Määrä
492 573
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | - | - | ||
| 138 | - | - | ||
| 481 | - | - | ||
| 561 | - | - | ||
| 815 | - | - |
Ylin
670,8VWAP
Alin
637,7VaihtoMäärä
1 745,4 2 654 381
VWAP
Ylin
670,8Alin
637,7VaihtoMäärä
1 745,4 2 654 381
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 -tulosraportti | 23.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. | |
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 24.10.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 18.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 25.4.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 10.4.2025 |
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
3 päivää sitten57 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Q1 -tulosraportti | 23.4. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. | |
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 24.10.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 18.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 25.4.2025 | |
| Vuosittainen yhtiökokous 2025 | 10.4.2025 |
2,40 SEK/osake
Irtoamispäivä 1.4.
0,31%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenWhat do you say? Will the USA and Israel attack Iran? If so, when do you think it will happen? The USA has flown a lot of defense material to the Middle East, to scare or to be used?·9 t sittenYou've put your finger on the clearest clue: All resources moved to the Persian Gulf, or the region around it. Own speculations follow (warning – long post): If the USA just wanted to make a statement, it would have been comparatively easy to fly down half a dozen B-2 Spirit from the base in Missouri and let them turn the Revolutionary Guard's bases and some of the facilities where they work on the Iranian nuclear weapons program* into rubble. This happened in June 2025 (Midnight Hammer). What has been done now is that: - a lot of very exclusive capabilities have been moved to the area (e.g. EW, nuke sniffer, SIGINT, as well as tanker aircraft and support functions/vessels. - air defense has been reinforced at a number of locations (air and naval bases) that the mullahs could hit with a missile, to avenge an American attack. Above all, the latter has taken a long time. Even the first movements were delayed when the eastern USA was hit by terrible weather. - - - The answer to the question 'What will happen?' can be found in things that don't make headlines. Look for reports/RUMINT regarding e.g. support vessels. Aircraft carriers and submarines can, as is well known, operate for years with the nuclear fuel they have on board, but an American destroyer drinks diesel and needs replenishment every third day to be a relevant resource (three destroyers are specifically assigned to CSG Abraham Lincoln). In addition, 7500 sailors and pilots need to eat and drink, which requires replenishment ≈ every 5-7 days, according to various online sources. - - - Spoke with Iran today (via detours and proxies – my friends mean that all communications are intercepted, and no one wants a visit from the IRGC). There is a deceptive calm there, as the large protests have been put down with rarely seen brutality. The Persian people are (rightly) really pissed at HM King Donald I, who on January 13 posted “Help is on the way” to those who protested. That was three weeks ago. How many human lives were needlessly wasted because of this, future historians will argue about. Conducting foreign policy via Truth Social is – in short – extremely reckless. In Iran, people are now talking about 'the other boat', which means they are speculating whether CSG George H W Bush is heading east. An article in Forbes mentioned this on January 21, and fueled rumors that the USA wanted to reinforce its presence in the Mediterranean = have an additional 50-80 cutting-edge aircraft ready for operations against Iran. So far, nothing suggests that it has crossed the Atlantic – and an aircraft carrier group cannot pass Gibraltar without making headlines... Iranian reports claim that the regime was willing to negotiate and even give up weapons-grade plutonium, but rumor-mongering among my Persian friends is intense right now, so it's best not to jump to conclusions. - - - However... All unglamorous data (concerning logistics etc.) at least tells me that an attack is reasonably imminent. But I thought that two weeks ago too... - - - *yes, I know that several of the Iranian facilities are deep inside mountains. However, it is possible to damage the operations, which was the effect of the operation on June 22 last year.·8 t sittenJust minutes after I posted the long rant above, I stumble upon this post on Twitter. It's a translation of a post by a Persian analyst, Shanin Moddares. I think he has some points... ”Military Analysis of the Region The United States, together with Israel, is planning a long-term military campaign against Iran; based on the initial assumption that the Iranian regime will, in response, target Israel and American bases across the Middle East. At present, there are at least 19 major U.S. bases and strategic command centers in the region, including: - Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar (CENTCOM headquarters) - The U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain - Camp Arifjan in Kuwait - As well as bases in Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and various Gulf countries. The critical point is that not all of these bases are equipped with permanent air defense systems. Some only have short-range defensive systems that are effectively useless against ballistic missiles. The large-scale deployment of THAAD and Patriot systems indicates that the Americans are preparing to provide missile defense coverage for nearly all of these bases. On the other hand, it is expected that the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln will be positioned off the coast of Oman (black dot). To protect it, air defense systems have even been deployed in the United Arab Emirates (route marked in red). The F-15 fighters stationed in Jordan and the British F-35s in Cyprus are not configured for offensive operations; their primary mission is to defend Israel against Iranian loitering munitions such as the Shahed-131/136. The key point here is: Logistics, coordination, and integration of such an extensive network of advanced systems take considerable time — and this process is still ongoing. This delay does not mean Trump has changed his mind; contrary to what many commentators, media outlets, journalists, and pseudo-analysts are trying to suggest. The puzzle is still being completed.” https://x.com/Eyalo365/status/2020121859694444580?s=20
- ·1 päivä sittenOne doesn't put in this much work if one doesn't believe one has a good chance:) In a call with investors today Saab CEO Micael Johansson claimed Canada was considering ways “not to be too dependent on the US by having a dual fleet, both F-35 and the Gripens.” “We are providing all [the] detailed information that they need to understand,” he said. Specifically, the Swedish manufacturer has shared details around speed of technology transfer and “how quickly” it could stand up a local Gripen production facility. Johansson also suggested that, should a deal be completed, the manufacturing site will play host to future Gripen export aircraft. https://breakingdefense.com/2026/02/saab-shares-detailed-information-on-gripen-with-canada-as-part-of-dual-fleet-pitch/·1 päivä sittenI believe the dual fleet reasoning is what will ultimately prevail. The different cutting-edge aircraft systems complement each other. Speculation: - Canada places an additional order for ≈ 25 aircraft from Lockheed Martin. It would then get an F-35 fleet of almost the same size as Denmark, or Belgium. Excellent for air superiority or operations within the framework of the alliance. - The remaining 45-47 aircraft will be Gripen E/F. They will do the heavy lifting (air patrolling and incident readiness) in an excellent and cost-effective way. Add half a dozen GlobalEye and Canada has – given that it procures relevant weapons to equip them with – a potent, updated, and useful air defense. Four effects are achieved: - 1. Economies of scale regarding maintenance and updates for the 16 aircraft already ordered and paid for. In short, it becomes a slightly better deal, as costs for pilot training, spare parts, integration into the Canadian air defense, etc., are spread across more units. - 2. Independence vis-à-vis USA is marked in practical action, not just in well-formulated phrases in Davos. - 3. Better economics and higher availability of the aircraft fleet (the F-35 system's maintenance needs are sky-high). - 4. A more versatile air defense. The systems are good at different things – they complement each other. All this happens independently of the positive effects resulting from Saab's sweetened offer regarding production in Canada, technology transfer, etc. Carney has been remarkably clear on the issue of national independence. It is no longer political hot air, but an established and adopted strategy. It is said that Saab has an ≈ 40 percent chance of getting a contract signed with Canada. In my world, the chance is now greater than that: Canada must hedge because USA's next president could be J D Vance.
- ·1 päivä sittenHow can one decide on the dividend already now (3.60/share)? Isn't that done at the annual general meeting?
- ·1 päivä sittenWhat use do we have for the analysts?? They arrive long after the price has gone up and settled at a rather stable level, and then their target prices are often well below. It's not that hard to set such target prices. All of us on this forum can do that too, and if not, even better! So what damn use do we have for them?? I, however, have never had any use for them! I rather think they have a negative manipulative effect on the price because they are always below! (at least on the Saab stock)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Stockholm
Määrä
Osto
494 541
Myynti
Määrä
492 573
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | - | - | ||
| 138 | - | - | ||
| 481 | - | - | ||
| 561 | - | - | ||
| 815 | - | - |
Ylin
670,8VWAP
Alin
637,7VaihtoMäärä
1 745,4 2 654 381
VWAP
Ylin
670,8Alin
637,7VaihtoMäärä
1 745,4 2 654 381
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt