2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
6 päivää sitten
‧32 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·1 päivä sittenWell, I don't know about you, but I overlooked that Bioporto expects KDIGO to finish finalizing the documents in Q4. KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) published an updated draft clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) at the end of March 2026. The company has provided feedback on the draft guideline and expects the final guideline to be published at the end of 2026. https://www.inderes.dk/en/releases/bioporto-announces-interim-results-for-the-second-quarter-and-first-half-of-2026This is a reply to both Bagerbrød and Muldyr. KDIGO has already, contrary to custom, informed which recommendations the different topics/categories receive. see link. Because it is known which treatment centers receive which recommendation, Bioporto has already in H1 closed deals with 54 hospitals.. In Q2 Bioporto has closed deals with 50 hospitals, From memory, I think there is a record in Q2. That Bioporto has closed so many deals in Q2 is only because KDIGO that the recommendations have been published. I have explained the following previously, as soon as I found out that KDIGO made an exception this time, by publishing the recommendations before they had finalized the documents. But a lot of water has flowed under the bridge since then, and new shareholders have certainly also joined. This is how they have done it in most cases. (I have read somewhere that these fill approx. 8,000 pages) Normally, they would only publish their recommendations gradually as they had finalized a chapter, (a topic/category) and they usually do it this way, because it would be unmanageable for the recipients if they only published everything when all 8,000 pages are finalized. It can be anything they come with recommendations for. The last time they came with a recommendation was what they thought people with diabetes should eat. And when they come with a recommendation, it is often several companies that produce what KDIGO recommends etc. Therefore, the tradition has been that they published one chapter at a time. But in this case with the NGAL test, it is Bioporto's test and as is known, Bioporto holds the patent for this, and therefore there is only one company that produces it KDIGO has several rules they must follow( as they themselves have written) and one of these rules is that when they come with a recommendation about this and that, it must always be done with due diligence. Because Bioporto is the only one that produces the test, to which KDIGO has given recommendations, they have assessed. Since no atomic bomb came (that there was evidence that the test did not work as intended) in the extended consultation process. So KDIGO published the recommendations that they had talked about in advance, which recommendations the different topics/categories should have. For to show due diligence. because if they did as they usually did, KDIGO's committee feared that Bioporto would not be able to reach everyone who would suddenly need this test based on KDIGO's recommendations. That is the reason why, contrary to custom, they already in April published their recommendations. KDIGO had not said anything, they had just published their recommendations, and I found out there because at that time I was in the process of finding out what KDIGO was. KDIGO also doesn't need to say anything because all treatment centers and companies that are affected by their recommendations have set an alarm so they are made aware of this. This is how you read the colors The red. the departments affected by this recommendation must integrate the NGAL test into their routine treatment. The blue. KDIGO recommends that they have the test in their routine treatment. The yellow here it is up to the doctors themselves to assess if they think it makes sense to use the NGAL test routinely. The green no recommendation, that is correct. it should not be detailed https://kdigo.org/guidelines/- ·2 päivää sittenI have a question regarding the 54 hospitals where Bioporto has closed a deal. I've become unsure if Bioporto has closed deals with all 54 hospitals before June 31st in Q2, or did he mean that they had closed deals with the 54 hospitals in total, up to August 20th, when there was a webcast?yes guidance is 60+ hospitals in 2026. As I wrote, I just watched the H1 webcast again, and it wasn't a waste of time, because this second time I heard that CB stated that we should probably expect the next guidance to be conditional, and not, as before, set in stone. The conditional guidance will naturally be about the number of hospitals they close deals with. (Based on previous webcasts, we have been explained that it works like this in the USA. There is a board that sets the budget for one year at a time, and they usually include a buffer. Therefore, we have seen that early in the year, Q1 and Q2, only a few hospitals close a deal with Bioporto, and late in the year. In Q3, the board can see if there is anything left from the mentioned buffer, and if there is, the board will approve an agreement for the NGAL test. But in Q4, they can see if there is room in the budget, if so, they will start to get agreements with Bioporto at this time. This has been the reason why Bioporto has traditionally received most agreements in Q4) But that was before KDIGO's various recommendations. It is clear to see that KDIGO's recommendations, which were published at the end of March, have been the direct reason why they have gained so many hospitals in Q2, because in Q1 they had gained 4 hospitals. With that in mind, it is natural that CB and KW cannot provide a fixed guidance, because as they say, we should expect it to be moved one or more times. If that happens, it will also affect guidance for 2027, 2028 and onwards. My expectations are that: When they have gained 54 hospitals in H1, I think that they will, at a minimum, close deals with at least as many or more in H2.
2 päivää sitten"Takeover a plausible scenario We view BioPorto as a potential acquisition target given the scalability of ProNephro and the likely relatively modest transaction size for large diagnostics companies. Based on past Nordic healthcare transactions, we estimate a potential deal could be executed at c7x EV/sales or c20x EV/EBITDA. We use our 2032e forecasts as a normalised year, reflecting global rollout of ProNephro and more representative margins. Discounting the implied valuation to present value using a 16.5% WACC (in line with our DCF) implies an equity value of DKK5.1–6.1 per share." DNB Carnegie, 20. august 2026, side 4
·21.8.Dear Bioporto The studies you are conducting!: Were concrete test kits from your "bad" batches used? Are we - next! - to expect/accept that the test kits you used could originate from your faulty tests?! Is the next news that your studies have been compromised? What about thinking a bit ahead? Take responsibility! Create trust!!!!: But you don't! ARE YOUR USED KITS FROM THE BATCH IN QUESTION???? Just think a bit!!!!Bagerbrød they have cleaned up after this batch. According to CB, no customers have complaints about it. Everything is 10-4. It is being discussed in the webcast.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
6 päivää sitten
‧32 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenWell, I don't know about you, but I overlooked that Bioporto expects KDIGO to finish finalizing the documents in Q4. KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) published an updated draft clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) at the end of March 2026. The company has provided feedback on the draft guideline and expects the final guideline to be published at the end of 2026. https://www.inderes.dk/en/releases/bioporto-announces-interim-results-for-the-second-quarter-and-first-half-of-2026This is a reply to both Bagerbrød and Muldyr. KDIGO has already, contrary to custom, informed which recommendations the different topics/categories receive. see link. Because it is known which treatment centers receive which recommendation, Bioporto has already in H1 closed deals with 54 hospitals.. In Q2 Bioporto has closed deals with 50 hospitals, From memory, I think there is a record in Q2. That Bioporto has closed so many deals in Q2 is only because KDIGO that the recommendations have been published. I have explained the following previously, as soon as I found out that KDIGO made an exception this time, by publishing the recommendations before they had finalized the documents. But a lot of water has flowed under the bridge since then, and new shareholders have certainly also joined. This is how they have done it in most cases. (I have read somewhere that these fill approx. 8,000 pages) Normally, they would only publish their recommendations gradually as they had finalized a chapter, (a topic/category) and they usually do it this way, because it would be unmanageable for the recipients if they only published everything when all 8,000 pages are finalized. It can be anything they come with recommendations for. The last time they came with a recommendation was what they thought people with diabetes should eat. And when they come with a recommendation, it is often several companies that produce what KDIGO recommends etc. Therefore, the tradition has been that they published one chapter at a time. But in this case with the NGAL test, it is Bioporto's test and as is known, Bioporto holds the patent for this, and therefore there is only one company that produces it KDIGO has several rules they must follow( as they themselves have written) and one of these rules is that when they come with a recommendation about this and that, it must always be done with due diligence. Because Bioporto is the only one that produces the test, to which KDIGO has given recommendations, they have assessed. Since no atomic bomb came (that there was evidence that the test did not work as intended) in the extended consultation process. So KDIGO published the recommendations that they had talked about in advance, which recommendations the different topics/categories should have. For to show due diligence. because if they did as they usually did, KDIGO's committee feared that Bioporto would not be able to reach everyone who would suddenly need this test based on KDIGO's recommendations. That is the reason why, contrary to custom, they already in April published their recommendations. KDIGO had not said anything, they had just published their recommendations, and I found out there because at that time I was in the process of finding out what KDIGO was. KDIGO also doesn't need to say anything because all treatment centers and companies that are affected by their recommendations have set an alarm so they are made aware of this. This is how you read the colors The red. the departments affected by this recommendation must integrate the NGAL test into their routine treatment. The blue. KDIGO recommends that they have the test in their routine treatment. The yellow here it is up to the doctors themselves to assess if they think it makes sense to use the NGAL test routinely. The green no recommendation, that is correct. it should not be detailed https://kdigo.org/guidelines/
- ·2 päivää sittenI have a question regarding the 54 hospitals where Bioporto has closed a deal. I've become unsure if Bioporto has closed deals with all 54 hospitals before June 31st in Q2, or did he mean that they had closed deals with the 54 hospitals in total, up to August 20th, when there was a webcast?yes guidance is 60+ hospitals in 2026. As I wrote, I just watched the H1 webcast again, and it wasn't a waste of time, because this second time I heard that CB stated that we should probably expect the next guidance to be conditional, and not, as before, set in stone. The conditional guidance will naturally be about the number of hospitals they close deals with. (Based on previous webcasts, we have been explained that it works like this in the USA. There is a board that sets the budget for one year at a time, and they usually include a buffer. Therefore, we have seen that early in the year, Q1 and Q2, only a few hospitals close a deal with Bioporto, and late in the year. In Q3, the board can see if there is anything left from the mentioned buffer, and if there is, the board will approve an agreement for the NGAL test. But in Q4, they can see if there is room in the budget, if so, they will start to get agreements with Bioporto at this time. This has been the reason why Bioporto has traditionally received most agreements in Q4) But that was before KDIGO's various recommendations. It is clear to see that KDIGO's recommendations, which were published at the end of March, have been the direct reason why they have gained so many hospitals in Q2, because in Q1 they had gained 4 hospitals. With that in mind, it is natural that CB and KW cannot provide a fixed guidance, because as they say, we should expect it to be moved one or more times. If that happens, it will also affect guidance for 2027, 2028 and onwards. My expectations are that: When they have gained 54 hospitals in H1, I think that they will, at a minimum, close deals with at least as many or more in H2.
- 2 päivää sitten"Takeover a plausible scenario We view BioPorto as a potential acquisition target given the scalability of ProNephro and the likely relatively modest transaction size for large diagnostics companies. Based on past Nordic healthcare transactions, we estimate a potential deal could be executed at c7x EV/sales or c20x EV/EBITDA. We use our 2032e forecasts as a normalised year, reflecting global rollout of ProNephro and more representative margins. Discounting the implied valuation to present value using a 16.5% WACC (in line with our DCF) implies an equity value of DKK5.1–6.1 per share." DNB Carnegie, 20. august 2026, side 4
- ·21.8.Dear Bioporto The studies you are conducting!: Were concrete test kits from your "bad" batches used? Are we - next! - to expect/accept that the test kits you used could originate from your faulty tests?! Is the next news that your studies have been compromised? What about thinking a bit ahead? Take responsibility! Create trust!!!!: But you don't! ARE YOUR USED KITS FROM THE BATCH IN QUESTION???? Just think a bit!!!!Bagerbrød they have cleaned up after this batch. According to CB, no customers have complaints about it. Everything is 10-4. It is being discussed in the webcast.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.8.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
6 päivää sitten
‧32 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.3. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 19.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 15.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 päivä sittenWell, I don't know about you, but I overlooked that Bioporto expects KDIGO to finish finalizing the documents in Q4. KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) published an updated draft clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) at the end of March 2026. The company has provided feedback on the draft guideline and expects the final guideline to be published at the end of 2026. https://www.inderes.dk/en/releases/bioporto-announces-interim-results-for-the-second-quarter-and-first-half-of-2026This is a reply to both Bagerbrød and Muldyr. KDIGO has already, contrary to custom, informed which recommendations the different topics/categories receive. see link. Because it is known which treatment centers receive which recommendation, Bioporto has already in H1 closed deals with 54 hospitals.. In Q2 Bioporto has closed deals with 50 hospitals, From memory, I think there is a record in Q2. That Bioporto has closed so many deals in Q2 is only because KDIGO that the recommendations have been published. I have explained the following previously, as soon as I found out that KDIGO made an exception this time, by publishing the recommendations before they had finalized the documents. But a lot of water has flowed under the bridge since then, and new shareholders have certainly also joined. This is how they have done it in most cases. (I have read somewhere that these fill approx. 8,000 pages) Normally, they would only publish their recommendations gradually as they had finalized a chapter, (a topic/category) and they usually do it this way, because it would be unmanageable for the recipients if they only published everything when all 8,000 pages are finalized. It can be anything they come with recommendations for. The last time they came with a recommendation was what they thought people with diabetes should eat. And when they come with a recommendation, it is often several companies that produce what KDIGO recommends etc. Therefore, the tradition has been that they published one chapter at a time. But in this case with the NGAL test, it is Bioporto's test and as is known, Bioporto holds the patent for this, and therefore there is only one company that produces it KDIGO has several rules they must follow( as they themselves have written) and one of these rules is that when they come with a recommendation about this and that, it must always be done with due diligence. Because Bioporto is the only one that produces the test, to which KDIGO has given recommendations, they have assessed. Since no atomic bomb came (that there was evidence that the test did not work as intended) in the extended consultation process. So KDIGO published the recommendations that they had talked about in advance, which recommendations the different topics/categories should have. For to show due diligence. because if they did as they usually did, KDIGO's committee feared that Bioporto would not be able to reach everyone who would suddenly need this test based on KDIGO's recommendations. That is the reason why, contrary to custom, they already in April published their recommendations. KDIGO had not said anything, they had just published their recommendations, and I found out there because at that time I was in the process of finding out what KDIGO was. KDIGO also doesn't need to say anything because all treatment centers and companies that are affected by their recommendations have set an alarm so they are made aware of this. This is how you read the colors The red. the departments affected by this recommendation must integrate the NGAL test into their routine treatment. The blue. KDIGO recommends that they have the test in their routine treatment. The yellow here it is up to the doctors themselves to assess if they think it makes sense to use the NGAL test routinely. The green no recommendation, that is correct. it should not be detailed https://kdigo.org/guidelines/
- ·2 päivää sittenI have a question regarding the 54 hospitals where Bioporto has closed a deal. I've become unsure if Bioporto has closed deals with all 54 hospitals before June 31st in Q2, or did he mean that they had closed deals with the 54 hospitals in total, up to August 20th, when there was a webcast?yes guidance is 60+ hospitals in 2026. As I wrote, I just watched the H1 webcast again, and it wasn't a waste of time, because this second time I heard that CB stated that we should probably expect the next guidance to be conditional, and not, as before, set in stone. The conditional guidance will naturally be about the number of hospitals they close deals with. (Based on previous webcasts, we have been explained that it works like this in the USA. There is a board that sets the budget for one year at a time, and they usually include a buffer. Therefore, we have seen that early in the year, Q1 and Q2, only a few hospitals close a deal with Bioporto, and late in the year. In Q3, the board can see if there is anything left from the mentioned buffer, and if there is, the board will approve an agreement for the NGAL test. But in Q4, they can see if there is room in the budget, if so, they will start to get agreements with Bioporto at this time. This has been the reason why Bioporto has traditionally received most agreements in Q4) But that was before KDIGO's various recommendations. It is clear to see that KDIGO's recommendations, which were published at the end of March, have been the direct reason why they have gained so many hospitals in Q2, because in Q1 they had gained 4 hospitals. With that in mind, it is natural that CB and KW cannot provide a fixed guidance, because as they say, we should expect it to be moved one or more times. If that happens, it will also affect guidance for 2027, 2028 and onwards. My expectations are that: When they have gained 54 hospitals in H1, I think that they will, at a minimum, close deals with at least as many or more in H2.
- 2 päivää sitten"Takeover a plausible scenario We view BioPorto as a potential acquisition target given the scalability of ProNephro and the likely relatively modest transaction size for large diagnostics companies. Based on past Nordic healthcare transactions, we estimate a potential deal could be executed at c7x EV/sales or c20x EV/EBITDA. We use our 2032e forecasts as a normalised year, reflecting global rollout of ProNephro and more representative margins. Discounting the implied valuation to present value using a 16.5% WACC (in line with our DCF) implies an equity value of DKK5.1–6.1 per share." DNB Carnegie, 20. august 2026, side 4
- ·21.8.Dear Bioporto The studies you are conducting!: Were concrete test kits from your "bad" batches used? Are we - next! - to expect/accept that the test kits you used could originate from your faulty tests?! Is the next news that your studies have been compromised? What about thinking a bit ahead? Take responsibility! Create trust!!!!: But you don't! ARE YOUR USED KITS FROM THE BATCH IN QUESTION???? Just think a bit!!!!Bagerbrød they have cleaned up after this batch. According to CB, no customers have complaints about it. Everything is 10-4. It is being discussed in the webcast.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt