2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
68 päivää sitten34 min
5,35 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
5,36%Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
408 226
Myynti
Määrä
405 236
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 750 | DDB | DDB | ||
| 692 | - | - | ||
| 1 616 | - | - | ||
| 64 | - | - | ||
| 1 039 | - | - |
Ylin
320,3VWAP
Alin
316,1VaihtoMäärä
283,6 888 932
VWAP
Ylin
320,3Alin
316,1VaihtoMäärä
283,6 888 932
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 6.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 18.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 2.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 7.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 31.10.2024 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuI have been a shareholder for many years with very solid returns. Last week I sold my entire holding at approximately 320 on average. I am very concerned about the Greenland rhetoric from Trump and its impact on Danish stocks, especially finance. The Cibor/Euribor/Nibor interest rate market is controlled by usa. They have many opportunities to pressure Danish assets. If usa were to use military force against Greenland without permission from Denmark, then I would not hold any shares beyond European Defence. If, on the other hand, Denmark makes a deal and a large fee is paid by USA to «utilize» Greenland, then it could be financially positive from a stock perspective. Other input?
·2 t sittenIf it gets so bad that there is an actual attack (military/financial), then there is no safe haven. EU defence fragmented and many have been drawn into the US defence industrial complex because it has been the only way to make money and zero different manufacturers buy from each other. E.g. the F35 program. It is probably not unlikely that if that happens, EU leaders will be forced to make some kind of counter-response and then one risks ending up in a tit for tat fight as China and US have been involved in.
·9.1.Isn't it only poor people who pay fees. I am a plus plus customer-I don't think I have any fees?
·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuUgh, that's because you have a lot of debt, I pay a fee and complained and got the message that I have too little debt, therefore😝87kr per month..must find another bank..
·9.1.I can hardly remember a longer period than the one we are in now, where it has been so quiet around DB. It's great if they can "behave properly" and just continue to run the business! Then it will probably remain a good case, I think.·9.1.Hi. Again, you are exaggerating. KYC/AML is legally mandated and banks follow European guidelines. Return to shareholders is created through a range of products that banks offer. The sum of this includes the interest margin, smaller fee’s and other income. If the fees are perceived as high, just check with other banks. Competition is great, but the requirements from the authorities are the same.
·8.1.Danske bank is right on the border between 'Hold' and 'Sell' according to my model. I cover almost all Danish stocks in my model, which is publicly available and updated every day: https://github.com/P1N60/stock_predictor/blob/main/data/screener_results/simple_screener_results.csv The stocks are ranked from 'best' to 'worst', as given by the 'Recommendation Score' column. The model finds stocks that are traded at too low a price in relation to the company's earnings, growth, board, and the stock's momentum. To be transparent, the last column shows if I myself own shares in the given company.
·6.1.If it goes up sharply (more than 20%), I will sell the day before the ex-date and then buy back.
·8.1.If you sell for example at 320 the day before ex-date, and then buy the day after at 310 after a distribution of 10kr, it probably doesn't mean much. You have a gain on DB, and you pay tax on the gain from the sale at 320. Thus, you pay tax on the profit of 10kr when you buy it at 310 and reset your GAK. As I see it, you lose what corresponds to 2 times brokerage fees. If you had a loss, I might understand it, if you had a realized gain elsewhere. So why exactly do you sell and then buy at the lower price?·8.1.That's fair - I think I hear many say that often the shares don't fall quite as much as the dividend. But maybe you'll be right :)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
68 päivää sitten34 min
5,35 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
5,36%Tuotto/v
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuI have been a shareholder for many years with very solid returns. Last week I sold my entire holding at approximately 320 on average. I am very concerned about the Greenland rhetoric from Trump and its impact on Danish stocks, especially finance. The Cibor/Euribor/Nibor interest rate market is controlled by usa. They have many opportunities to pressure Danish assets. If usa were to use military force against Greenland without permission from Denmark, then I would not hold any shares beyond European Defence. If, on the other hand, Denmark makes a deal and a large fee is paid by USA to «utilize» Greenland, then it could be financially positive from a stock perspective. Other input?·2 t sittenIf it gets so bad that there is an actual attack (military/financial), then there is no safe haven. EU defence fragmented and many have been drawn into the US defence industrial complex because it has been the only way to make money and zero different manufacturers buy from each other. E.g. the F35 program. It is probably not unlikely that if that happens, EU leaders will be forced to make some kind of counter-response and then one risks ending up in a tit for tat fight as China and US have been involved in.
- ·9.1.Isn't it only poor people who pay fees. I am a plus plus customer-I don't think I have any fees?·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuUgh, that's because you have a lot of debt, I pay a fee and complained and got the message that I have too little debt, therefore😝87kr per month..must find another bank..
- ·9.1.I can hardly remember a longer period than the one we are in now, where it has been so quiet around DB. It's great if they can "behave properly" and just continue to run the business! Then it will probably remain a good case, I think.·9.1.Hi. Again, you are exaggerating. KYC/AML is legally mandated and banks follow European guidelines. Return to shareholders is created through a range of products that banks offer. The sum of this includes the interest margin, smaller fee’s and other income. If the fees are perceived as high, just check with other banks. Competition is great, but the requirements from the authorities are the same.
- ·8.1.Danske bank is right on the border between 'Hold' and 'Sell' according to my model. I cover almost all Danish stocks in my model, which is publicly available and updated every day: https://github.com/P1N60/stock_predictor/blob/main/data/screener_results/simple_screener_results.csv The stocks are ranked from 'best' to 'worst', as given by the 'Recommendation Score' column. The model finds stocks that are traded at too low a price in relation to the company's earnings, growth, board, and the stock's momentum. To be transparent, the last column shows if I myself own shares in the given company.
- ·6.1.If it goes up sharply (more than 20%), I will sell the day before the ex-date and then buy back.·8.1.If you sell for example at 320 the day before ex-date, and then buy the day after at 310 after a distribution of 10kr, it probably doesn't mean much. You have a gain on DB, and you pay tax on the gain from the sale at 320. Thus, you pay tax on the profit of 10kr when you buy it at 310 and reset your GAK. As I see it, you lose what corresponds to 2 times brokerage fees. If you had a loss, I might understand it, if you had a realized gain elsewhere. So why exactly do you sell and then buy at the lower price?·8.1.That's fair - I think I hear many say that often the shares don't fall quite as much as the dividend. But maybe you'll be right :)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
408 226
Myynti
Määrä
405 236
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 750 | DDB | DDB | ||
| 692 | - | - | ||
| 1 616 | - | - | ||
| 64 | - | - | ||
| 1 039 | - | - |
Ylin
320,3VWAP
Alin
316,1VaihtoMäärä
283,6 888 932
VWAP
Ylin
320,3Alin
316,1VaihtoMäärä
283,6 888 932
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 6.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 18.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 2.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 7.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 31.10.2024 |
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
68 päivää sitten34 min
Uutiset
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr, FactSet| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 -tulosraportti | 5.2. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 -tulosraportti | 6.11.2025 | |
| 2025 Q2 -tulosraportti | 18.7.2025 | |
| 2025 Q1 -tulosraportti | 2.5.2025 | |
| 2024 Q4 -tulosraportti | 7.2.2025 | |
| 2024 Q3 -tulosraportti | 31.10.2024 |
5,35 DKK/osake
Viimeisin osinko
5,36%Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- ·3 päivää sitten · MuokattuI have been a shareholder for many years with very solid returns. Last week I sold my entire holding at approximately 320 on average. I am very concerned about the Greenland rhetoric from Trump and its impact on Danish stocks, especially finance. The Cibor/Euribor/Nibor interest rate market is controlled by usa. They have many opportunities to pressure Danish assets. If usa were to use military force against Greenland without permission from Denmark, then I would not hold any shares beyond European Defence. If, on the other hand, Denmark makes a deal and a large fee is paid by USA to «utilize» Greenland, then it could be financially positive from a stock perspective. Other input?·2 t sittenIf it gets so bad that there is an actual attack (military/financial), then there is no safe haven. EU defence fragmented and many have been drawn into the US defence industrial complex because it has been the only way to make money and zero different manufacturers buy from each other. E.g. the F35 program. It is probably not unlikely that if that happens, EU leaders will be forced to make some kind of counter-response and then one risks ending up in a tit for tat fight as China and US have been involved in.
- ·9.1.Isn't it only poor people who pay fees. I am a plus plus customer-I don't think I have any fees?·1 päivä sitten · MuokattuUgh, that's because you have a lot of debt, I pay a fee and complained and got the message that I have too little debt, therefore😝87kr per month..must find another bank..
- ·9.1.I can hardly remember a longer period than the one we are in now, where it has been so quiet around DB. It's great if they can "behave properly" and just continue to run the business! Then it will probably remain a good case, I think.·9.1.Hi. Again, you are exaggerating. KYC/AML is legally mandated and banks follow European guidelines. Return to shareholders is created through a range of products that banks offer. The sum of this includes the interest margin, smaller fee’s and other income. If the fees are perceived as high, just check with other banks. Competition is great, but the requirements from the authorities are the same.
- ·8.1.Danske bank is right on the border between 'Hold' and 'Sell' according to my model. I cover almost all Danish stocks in my model, which is publicly available and updated every day: https://github.com/P1N60/stock_predictor/blob/main/data/screener_results/simple_screener_results.csv The stocks are ranked from 'best' to 'worst', as given by the 'Recommendation Score' column. The model finds stocks that are traded at too low a price in relation to the company's earnings, growth, board, and the stock's momentum. To be transparent, the last column shows if I myself own shares in the given company.
- ·6.1.If it goes up sharply (more than 20%), I will sell the day before the ex-date and then buy back.·8.1.If you sell for example at 320 the day before ex-date, and then buy the day after at 310 after a distribution of 10kr, it probably doesn't mean much. You have a gain on DB, and you pay tax on the gain from the sale at 320. Thus, you pay tax on the profit of 10kr when you buy it at 310 and reset your GAK. As I see it, you lose what corresponds to 2 times brokerage fees. If you had a loss, I might understand it, if you had a realized gain elsewhere. So why exactly do you sell and then buy at the lower price?·8.1.That's fair - I think I hear many say that often the shares don't fall quite as much as the dividend. But maybe you'll be right :)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Nasdaq Copenhagen
Määrä
Osto
408 226
Myynti
Määrä
405 236
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 750 | DDB | DDB | ||
| 692 | - | - | ||
| 1 616 | - | - | ||
| 64 | - | - | ||
| 1 039 | - | - |
Ylin
320,3VWAP
Alin
316,1VaihtoMäärä
283,6 888 932
VWAP
Ylin
320,3Alin
316,1VaihtoMäärä
283,6 888 932
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt