Q1-osavuosiraportti
17 päivää sitten‧1 t 37 min
1,05 USD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,68 %
Tuotto/v
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
60
Myynti
Määrä
18
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Yhtiökokous | 25.9. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 29.8. | |
| 2025 Vuosiraportti | 26.6. | |
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 15.5. | |
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 20.2. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 15.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
2 t sitten·Alibaba is rising in the pre-market and on the Hong Kong stock exchange due to the proclaimed anti-involution policy, which in theory is positive news for Alibaba because it can provide a floor under the margins in e-commerce and instant retail. In other words, if the government can stop the price war in e-commerce, it can help Alibaba to better margins and reduce losses. Alibaba is a giant, so they can immediately do better than small competitors if the discount race is dampened.- 2 päivää sitten·According to Gurufocus, Alibaba and Baidu have started using their own chips for AI training, which reduces their dependence on Nvidia – a geopolitical vulnerability that has so far put a lid on the case. This strengthens strategic independence and can provide better margins in the long term. This shows that Chinese AI giants are not just software players, but also invest deeply in hardware → strengthening their position in the national AI economy and have a high innovation capacity. The price increases (+5% Alibaba, +8% Baidu Hong Kong stock exchange) indicate that the market interprets it as an important strategic step – especially because the fear of chip sanctions from the US has hampered sentiment. The development is still in its early stages. This could be potentially good news because it shows strategic momentum and gives more control over the value chain and is the first step on the journey towards challenging Nvidia.
2 päivää sitten·Others who bought because they like the name😝
2 päivää sitten · Muokattu·Not at all. Bought because it is a good and important company with great potential. I also thought it would be good to have a little investment in the Chinese market as a kind of counterpoint to the "West" in terms of AI. The investment is therefore limited due to the complicated political situation in China. The name has nothing to do with me, quite the opposite. If they had another name that I liked better and that I experienced sounded more professional, I could have invested a little more. Conclusion: I, unlike you, definitely did not buy because I "liked" the name. To me, this sounds unprofessional to buy a company because of its name. It sounds more rational and more correct for an increased probability of higher returns in the long term to buy a company because of "the fundamentals" and not the name. If I were you, I would focus more on other factors than names, although it is not illegal to buy based on names and in some cases names can have some meaning, but generally speaking, the importance of names has limited meaning for a company.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q1-osavuosiraportti
17 päivää sitten‧1 t 37 min
1,05 USD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,68 %
Tuotto/v
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 2 t sitten·Alibaba is rising in the pre-market and on the Hong Kong stock exchange due to the proclaimed anti-involution policy, which in theory is positive news for Alibaba because it can provide a floor under the margins in e-commerce and instant retail. In other words, if the government can stop the price war in e-commerce, it can help Alibaba to better margins and reduce losses. Alibaba is a giant, so they can immediately do better than small competitors if the discount race is dampened.
- 2 päivää sitten·According to Gurufocus, Alibaba and Baidu have started using their own chips for AI training, which reduces their dependence on Nvidia – a geopolitical vulnerability that has so far put a lid on the case. This strengthens strategic independence and can provide better margins in the long term. This shows that Chinese AI giants are not just software players, but also invest deeply in hardware → strengthening their position in the national AI economy and have a high innovation capacity. The price increases (+5% Alibaba, +8% Baidu Hong Kong stock exchange) indicate that the market interprets it as an important strategic step – especially because the fear of chip sanctions from the US has hampered sentiment. The development is still in its early stages. This could be potentially good news because it shows strategic momentum and gives more control over the value chain and is the first step on the journey towards challenging Nvidia.
- 2 päivää sitten·Others who bought because they like the name😝2 päivää sitten · Muokattu·Not at all. Bought because it is a good and important company with great potential. I also thought it would be good to have a little investment in the Chinese market as a kind of counterpoint to the "West" in terms of AI. The investment is therefore limited due to the complicated political situation in China. The name has nothing to do with me, quite the opposite. If they had another name that I liked better and that I experienced sounded more professional, I could have invested a little more. Conclusion: I, unlike you, definitely did not buy because I "liked" the name. To me, this sounds unprofessional to buy a company because of its name. It sounds more rational and more correct for an increased probability of higher returns in the long term to buy a company because of "the fundamentals" and not the name. If I were you, I would focus more on other factors than names, although it is not illegal to buy based on names and in some cases names can have some meaning, but generally speaking, the importance of names has limited meaning for a company.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
60
Myynti
Määrä
18
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Yhtiökokous | 25.9. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 29.8. | |
| 2025 Vuosiraportti | 26.6. | |
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 15.5. | |
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 20.2. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 15.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
Q1-osavuosiraportti
17 päivää sitten‧1 t 37 min
Uutiset ja analyysit
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
| 2025 Yhtiökokous | 25.9. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2026 Q1-osavuosiraportti | 29.8. | |
| 2025 Vuosiraportti | 26.6. | |
| 2025 Q4-osavuosiraportti | 15.5. | |
| 2025 Q3-osavuosiraportti | 20.2. | |
| 2025 Q2-osavuosiraportti | 15.11.2024 |
Datan lähde: Morningstar, Quartr
1,05 USD/osake
Viimeisin osinko
0,68 %
Tuotto/v
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
- 2 t sitten·Alibaba is rising in the pre-market and on the Hong Kong stock exchange due to the proclaimed anti-involution policy, which in theory is positive news for Alibaba because it can provide a floor under the margins in e-commerce and instant retail. In other words, if the government can stop the price war in e-commerce, it can help Alibaba to better margins and reduce losses. Alibaba is a giant, so they can immediately do better than small competitors if the discount race is dampened.
- 2 päivää sitten·According to Gurufocus, Alibaba and Baidu have started using their own chips for AI training, which reduces their dependence on Nvidia – a geopolitical vulnerability that has so far put a lid on the case. This strengthens strategic independence and can provide better margins in the long term. This shows that Chinese AI giants are not just software players, but also invest deeply in hardware → strengthening their position in the national AI economy and have a high innovation capacity. The price increases (+5% Alibaba, +8% Baidu Hong Kong stock exchange) indicate that the market interprets it as an important strategic step – especially because the fear of chip sanctions from the US has hampered sentiment. The development is still in its early stages. This could be potentially good news because it shows strategic momentum and gives more control over the value chain and is the first step on the journey towards challenging Nvidia.
- 2 päivää sitten·Others who bought because they like the name😝2 päivää sitten · Muokattu·Not at all. Bought because it is a good and important company with great potential. I also thought it would be good to have a little investment in the Chinese market as a kind of counterpoint to the "West" in terms of AI. The investment is therefore limited due to the complicated political situation in China. The name has nothing to do with me, quite the opposite. If they had another name that I liked better and that I experienced sounded more professional, I could have invested a little more. Conclusion: I, unlike you, definitely did not buy because I "liked" the name. To me, this sounds unprofessional to buy a company because of its name. It sounds more rational and more correct for an increased probability of higher returns in the long term to buy a company because of "the fundamentals" and not the name. If I were you, I would focus more on other factors than names, although it is not illegal to buy based on names and in some cases names can have some meaning, but generally speaking, the importance of names has limited meaning for a company.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
60
Myynti
Määrä
18
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Ylin
-VWAP
Alin
-Vaihto ()
VWAP
Ylin
-Alin
-Vaihto ()
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt