Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
44 päivää sitten

Tarjoustasot

NorwayEuronext Expand Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
395--
7--
20--
957--
500--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
26.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
26.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
19.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
26.2.2025

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 24 min sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    24 min sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    On forums, I often feel things become far too black and white. Either Norse is going straight into a new share issue, or people are talking almost as if a dividend is around the corner. For my part, I still have great faith in Norse, with or without a share issue, but at the same time, I think it's completely natural to objectively assess the share issue risk. When I look at it collectively, I assess that a share issue is still a real possibility, but not necessarily because the case is broken. It's primarily about balance and timing. Norse exited 2025 with approximately 17.5 million dollars in free cash, while the 20 million dollar overdraft facility was fully drawn, and maturity is pointed to April 30, 2026. That alone means the share issue question is not just about operations, but also about refinancing and buffer. At the same time, I think the market underestimates that operations have actually looked significantly better going into 2026. January came in with a full 99 percent load factor and TRASK up 21 percent year over year, and February with a 98 percent load factor and TRASK up 25 percent. In addition, we know that six aircraft on long-term ACMI provide stable income without fuel exposure, and that is an important reason why Norse can withstand this period better than before. What makes the picture difficult to read for me is the war and fuel. Norse has no fuel hedging on its own production, and jet fuel has gone to levels that in practice can eat up large parts of the margin improvement if this persists through Q2. IATA showed around 209 dollars per barrel in the last weekly cut, and several newspaper articles highlight that the supply situation could remain tight for months even if the conflict were to completely calm down. It is therefore entirely possible to be right that Q1 was better than feared, and at the same time believe that the board may still consider a share issue to secure the balance sheet. I also place some weight on the history. Norse has not been in the habit of waiting until the cash register is empty. On the contrary, they have several times raised capital or renegotiated financing in advance of weaker periods. We saw it in the share issue in November 2023, the repair issue in January 2024, the investment and loan facility in November 2024, and the directed issue in October 2025. That tells me that the board normally tries to stay a little ahead, not behind. Regarding Tigerstaden and MH Capital, I don't think one should overinterpret it, but it's not irrelevant either. For me, this is primarily a sign that some investors do not want to sit through the uncertainty, not necessarily that they know something the market doesn't know. So, overall, I assess that a share issue is still more likely than many optimists will admit, but also not as obvious as many pessimists pretend. If Norse secures an extension or replacement of the overdraft, and Q1/Q2 remains roughly in the area many of us model, the company can well get through the summer without a share issue. But if fuel remains at these levels, and refinancing is not clarified in a good way, then I think it's difficult to argue that the share issue risk is low. For my part, I therefore conclude that a share issue is absolutely a real possibility, but not because Norse is necessarily heading into something fundamentally weak. More because they still have a small financial buffer in a period of extreme fuel and geopolitical uncertainty. And that is exactly what the board must deal with, regardless of how strong the previous quarter was.
    15 min sitten
    ·
    15 min sitten
    ·
    Preponderance of probability that a share issue may become a necessity given the uncertainty surrounding the increased cost base and the demand outlook sounds reasonable.
  • 23 t sitten
    ·
    23 t sitten
    ·
    Sounding the alarm: – The crisis just three weeks away European airports are sounding the alarm before the summer season. Suppliers of jet fuel cannot cannot guarantee deliveries into May. https://www.finansavisen.no/
    37 min sitten
    ·
    37 min sitten
    ·
    The bet is whether fuel prices will come down quickly enough to prevent the need for an equity issuance. There is high risk even if fuel prices will eventually fall.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Does anyone have a good explanation for why we still haven't received the March figures from Norse? These normally come out at the very beginning of the month, so this is starting to get unusually late. It's hard to see that it's only about counting or practical matters. March was also not a transition month in the route network, so traffic data should in principle be relatively straightforward to publish. Thus, it's natural to ask: are they holding back the figures because they plan to release them together with a larger announcement? Strategy update? Financing? Something else? Anyone dare to speculate a bit?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Heard they fired the traffic figures lady. Nah.
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Jesus stands completely central in sørlandet after "søtlandsporten" was forcibly moved to Oslo.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    I am quite new to this and have almost never participated in discussions about stocks before, so I gladly welcome input. I have bought some shares in Norse, and most were bought before the price fell quite a bit. To do some of my own research, I have looked at available tickets on several of the company's routes to and from various destinations. It generally seems that there are few available tickets, especially in the summer season. I am a bit unsure how this should be interpreted – could it indicate high demand and potentially full flights, and if so, a positive effect on revenues? Or are there other explanations for the low availability? I am of course aware that fuel prices and other costs play a big role in profitability, but I found it interesting to look a bit at the demand for tickets. I gladly welcome thoughts from people with more experience in the sector.
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Kristian, norse mostly operates with full planes, 96-98 percent, in addition they transport a lot of fish.. Ticket prices have increased sharply recently, unprofitable routes have been removed. I have been involved for a long time, and will stay for a long time even though I am in the red this time:-)
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    When are the figures for q1 coming?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    21 may
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    thanks kaspers:-)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
44 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 24 min sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    24 min sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    On forums, I often feel things become far too black and white. Either Norse is going straight into a new share issue, or people are talking almost as if a dividend is around the corner. For my part, I still have great faith in Norse, with or without a share issue, but at the same time, I think it's completely natural to objectively assess the share issue risk. When I look at it collectively, I assess that a share issue is still a real possibility, but not necessarily because the case is broken. It's primarily about balance and timing. Norse exited 2025 with approximately 17.5 million dollars in free cash, while the 20 million dollar overdraft facility was fully drawn, and maturity is pointed to April 30, 2026. That alone means the share issue question is not just about operations, but also about refinancing and buffer. At the same time, I think the market underestimates that operations have actually looked significantly better going into 2026. January came in with a full 99 percent load factor and TRASK up 21 percent year over year, and February with a 98 percent load factor and TRASK up 25 percent. In addition, we know that six aircraft on long-term ACMI provide stable income without fuel exposure, and that is an important reason why Norse can withstand this period better than before. What makes the picture difficult to read for me is the war and fuel. Norse has no fuel hedging on its own production, and jet fuel has gone to levels that in practice can eat up large parts of the margin improvement if this persists through Q2. IATA showed around 209 dollars per barrel in the last weekly cut, and several newspaper articles highlight that the supply situation could remain tight for months even if the conflict were to completely calm down. It is therefore entirely possible to be right that Q1 was better than feared, and at the same time believe that the board may still consider a share issue to secure the balance sheet. I also place some weight on the history. Norse has not been in the habit of waiting until the cash register is empty. On the contrary, they have several times raised capital or renegotiated financing in advance of weaker periods. We saw it in the share issue in November 2023, the repair issue in January 2024, the investment and loan facility in November 2024, and the directed issue in October 2025. That tells me that the board normally tries to stay a little ahead, not behind. Regarding Tigerstaden and MH Capital, I don't think one should overinterpret it, but it's not irrelevant either. For me, this is primarily a sign that some investors do not want to sit through the uncertainty, not necessarily that they know something the market doesn't know. So, overall, I assess that a share issue is still more likely than many optimists will admit, but also not as obvious as many pessimists pretend. If Norse secures an extension or replacement of the overdraft, and Q1/Q2 remains roughly in the area many of us model, the company can well get through the summer without a share issue. But if fuel remains at these levels, and refinancing is not clarified in a good way, then I think it's difficult to argue that the share issue risk is low. For my part, I therefore conclude that a share issue is absolutely a real possibility, but not because Norse is necessarily heading into something fundamentally weak. More because they still have a small financial buffer in a period of extreme fuel and geopolitical uncertainty. And that is exactly what the board must deal with, regardless of how strong the previous quarter was.
    15 min sitten
    ·
    15 min sitten
    ·
    Preponderance of probability that a share issue may become a necessity given the uncertainty surrounding the increased cost base and the demand outlook sounds reasonable.
  • 23 t sitten
    ·
    23 t sitten
    ·
    Sounding the alarm: – The crisis just three weeks away European airports are sounding the alarm before the summer season. Suppliers of jet fuel cannot cannot guarantee deliveries into May. https://www.finansavisen.no/
    37 min sitten
    ·
    37 min sitten
    ·
    The bet is whether fuel prices will come down quickly enough to prevent the need for an equity issuance. There is high risk even if fuel prices will eventually fall.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Does anyone have a good explanation for why we still haven't received the March figures from Norse? These normally come out at the very beginning of the month, so this is starting to get unusually late. It's hard to see that it's only about counting or practical matters. March was also not a transition month in the route network, so traffic data should in principle be relatively straightforward to publish. Thus, it's natural to ask: are they holding back the figures because they plan to release them together with a larger announcement? Strategy update? Financing? Something else? Anyone dare to speculate a bit?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Heard they fired the traffic figures lady. Nah.
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Jesus stands completely central in sørlandet after "søtlandsporten" was forcibly moved to Oslo.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    I am quite new to this and have almost never participated in discussions about stocks before, so I gladly welcome input. I have bought some shares in Norse, and most were bought before the price fell quite a bit. To do some of my own research, I have looked at available tickets on several of the company's routes to and from various destinations. It generally seems that there are few available tickets, especially in the summer season. I am a bit unsure how this should be interpreted – could it indicate high demand and potentially full flights, and if so, a positive effect on revenues? Or are there other explanations for the low availability? I am of course aware that fuel prices and other costs play a big role in profitability, but I found it interesting to look a bit at the demand for tickets. I gladly welcome thoughts from people with more experience in the sector.
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Kristian, norse mostly operates with full planes, 96-98 percent, in addition they transport a lot of fish.. Ticket prices have increased sharply recently, unprofitable routes have been removed. I have been involved for a long time, and will stay for a long time even though I am in the red this time:-)
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    When are the figures for q1 coming?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    21 may
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    thanks kaspers:-)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

NorwayEuronext Expand Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
395--
7--
20--
957--
500--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
26.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
26.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
19.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
26.2.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
44 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
26.2.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
26.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
19.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
21.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
26.2.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Shareville

Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Kirjaudu
  • 24 min sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    24 min sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    On forums, I often feel things become far too black and white. Either Norse is going straight into a new share issue, or people are talking almost as if a dividend is around the corner. For my part, I still have great faith in Norse, with or without a share issue, but at the same time, I think it's completely natural to objectively assess the share issue risk. When I look at it collectively, I assess that a share issue is still a real possibility, but not necessarily because the case is broken. It's primarily about balance and timing. Norse exited 2025 with approximately 17.5 million dollars in free cash, while the 20 million dollar overdraft facility was fully drawn, and maturity is pointed to April 30, 2026. That alone means the share issue question is not just about operations, but also about refinancing and buffer. At the same time, I think the market underestimates that operations have actually looked significantly better going into 2026. January came in with a full 99 percent load factor and TRASK up 21 percent year over year, and February with a 98 percent load factor and TRASK up 25 percent. In addition, we know that six aircraft on long-term ACMI provide stable income without fuel exposure, and that is an important reason why Norse can withstand this period better than before. What makes the picture difficult to read for me is the war and fuel. Norse has no fuel hedging on its own production, and jet fuel has gone to levels that in practice can eat up large parts of the margin improvement if this persists through Q2. IATA showed around 209 dollars per barrel in the last weekly cut, and several newspaper articles highlight that the supply situation could remain tight for months even if the conflict were to completely calm down. It is therefore entirely possible to be right that Q1 was better than feared, and at the same time believe that the board may still consider a share issue to secure the balance sheet. I also place some weight on the history. Norse has not been in the habit of waiting until the cash register is empty. On the contrary, they have several times raised capital or renegotiated financing in advance of weaker periods. We saw it in the share issue in November 2023, the repair issue in January 2024, the investment and loan facility in November 2024, and the directed issue in October 2025. That tells me that the board normally tries to stay a little ahead, not behind. Regarding Tigerstaden and MH Capital, I don't think one should overinterpret it, but it's not irrelevant either. For me, this is primarily a sign that some investors do not want to sit through the uncertainty, not necessarily that they know something the market doesn't know. So, overall, I assess that a share issue is still more likely than many optimists will admit, but also not as obvious as many pessimists pretend. If Norse secures an extension or replacement of the overdraft, and Q1/Q2 remains roughly in the area many of us model, the company can well get through the summer without a share issue. But if fuel remains at these levels, and refinancing is not clarified in a good way, then I think it's difficult to argue that the share issue risk is low. For my part, I therefore conclude that a share issue is absolutely a real possibility, but not because Norse is necessarily heading into something fundamentally weak. More because they still have a small financial buffer in a period of extreme fuel and geopolitical uncertainty. And that is exactly what the board must deal with, regardless of how strong the previous quarter was.
    15 min sitten
    ·
    15 min sitten
    ·
    Preponderance of probability that a share issue may become a necessity given the uncertainty surrounding the increased cost base and the demand outlook sounds reasonable.
  • 23 t sitten
    ·
    23 t sitten
    ·
    Sounding the alarm: – The crisis just three weeks away European airports are sounding the alarm before the summer season. Suppliers of jet fuel cannot cannot guarantee deliveries into May. https://www.finansavisen.no/
    37 min sitten
    ·
    37 min sitten
    ·
    The bet is whether fuel prices will come down quickly enough to prevent the need for an equity issuance. There is high risk even if fuel prices will eventually fall.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Does anyone have a good explanation for why we still haven't received the March figures from Norse? These normally come out at the very beginning of the month, so this is starting to get unusually late. It's hard to see that it's only about counting or practical matters. March was also not a transition month in the route network, so traffic data should in principle be relatively straightforward to publish. Thus, it's natural to ask: are they holding back the figures because they plan to release them together with a larger announcement? Strategy update? Financing? Something else? Anyone dare to speculate a bit?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Heard they fired the traffic figures lady. Nah.
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 päivä sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    Jesus stands completely central in sørlandet after "søtlandsporten" was forcibly moved to Oslo.
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    I am quite new to this and have almost never participated in discussions about stocks before, so I gladly welcome input. I have bought some shares in Norse, and most were bought before the price fell quite a bit. To do some of my own research, I have looked at available tickets on several of the company's routes to and from various destinations. It generally seems that there are few available tickets, especially in the summer season. I am a bit unsure how this should be interpreted – could it indicate high demand and potentially full flights, and if so, a positive effect on revenues? Or are there other explanations for the low availability? I am of course aware that fuel prices and other costs play a big role in profitability, but I found it interesting to look a bit at the demand for tickets. I gladly welcome thoughts from people with more experience in the sector.
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    Kristian, norse mostly operates with full planes, 96-98 percent, in addition they transport a lot of fish.. Ticket prices have increased sharply recently, unprofitable routes have been removed. I have been involved for a long time, and will stay for a long time even though I am in the red this time:-)
  • 1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    When are the figures for q1 coming?
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    21 may
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    1 päivä sitten
    ·
    thanks kaspers:-)
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

NorwayEuronext Expand Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
395--
7--
20--
957--
500--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt
© 2026 Nordnet Bank AB.
Nordnet | Alvar Aallon katu 5 C, 3. krs | FI-00100 Helsinki