2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
77 päivää sitten
‧11 min
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | ||
| 150 | ||
| 186 280 | ||
| 25 | ||
| 10 000 |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 25.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
·6 min sittenWhat do the rest of you think about the outcome of the strategic process? Personally, I am starting to fear that we will end up with a solution where a larger, well-capitalized player comes in and takes over control of the company in cooperation with the current largest shareholders, through a directed share issue and extensive capital expansion. The longer the strategic process drags on, the more uncertain I become as to whether we will actually see a cash offer for the company, with a specific price per share to current shareholders. As mentioned in a previous post, there is a requirement that European airlines must have at least 50% European ownership and effective control. Could this be part of the explanation for how a potential solution will be structured? A possible scenario is that new capital comes from a larger international player, while current major European owners participate in a directed share issue to ensure that the ownership requirements continue to be met. In such a scenario, we small shareholders risk being heavily diluted and practically left on the sidelines, while the largest players secure further ownership and control. Naturally, I hope for a solution that also safeguards current shareholders, but I must admit that I am becoming increasingly skeptical as to whether a traditional cash-settled acquisition is the most probable outcome. What do the rest of you think? Is this a realistic scenario, or are there factors that suggest we might still receive a cash offer? Particularly interested in hearing your thoughts @manawa As I see it, you have provided many good and well-thought-out analyses along the way. Unfortunately, a war got in the way of the good path we were on. How do you assess the situation and the most likely outcomes now?
·16 t sittenWho can actually buy the company? In connection with the ongoing strategic process in Norse, I recently became a bit curious about one thing: Can an Asian airline buy all of Norse and at the same time retain the company's European traffic rights? After examining the regulations, it turns out that this is not so simple. Norse has a European operator structure and associated traffic rights, which can make the company attractive for Asian airlines that want greater access to the European market. According to EU/EEA regulations, more than 50 % of a European airline must be owned by EU/EEA interests, who must also have actual control over the company. An Asian player can therefore normally not buy 100 % of Norse and at the same time keep the European operating permits unchanged. An interesting example is Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), which recently entered into a wet lease agreement with Norse for two Boeing 787-9. A small fun fact is that PIA was recently privatized. An investor consortium led by Arif Habib took over control in June 2026. Here, well-capitalized owners stand behind, with a total investment commitment of around 180 billion Pakistani rupees, of which significant amounts will be used to strengthen and further develop the airline. If these investors see a strategic potential in Norse, PIA can in my assessment be an interesting candidate. They have already established a commercial collaboration through the wet lease agreement, and Norse can potentially provide access to a European operator platform, capacity and traffic rights. However, the ownership rules create some limitations. PIA can normally not take over the majority and the actual control over the European aviation business. An alternative could be to team up with European investors who retain majority ownership and control. It makes me wonder whether the strategic process might just as well end in a partnership or a shared ownership structure as a complete acquisition. Can PIA and their new well-capitalized owners be a relevant candidate if they see the value of Norse's European platform? This is naturally just speculation on my part, but I find the connection interesting, especially considering the timing of the privatization, the capital that has come in, and the recently concluded agreement between the companies. What do you think?
Do you also drink in the middle of the week? Hehe... nah, I think the angle is good. I don't quite see where we who are today's owners stand in such a case. But, if PIA contributes to lifting the value in the company, then I recommend them to go for it!- ·1 päivä sittenDemocrats triumph....end of war in the Middle East...oil down and Norse up. Simple? Hope so...🛫🛫🛫🚀🚀🚀💰💰💰
1 päivä sittenJulkaisu on poistettu.
Who is pia? Thai lady? Democrats support war and despise Russia. We will see how the hare jumps.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
77 päivää sitten
‧11 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·6 min sittenWhat do the rest of you think about the outcome of the strategic process? Personally, I am starting to fear that we will end up with a solution where a larger, well-capitalized player comes in and takes over control of the company in cooperation with the current largest shareholders, through a directed share issue and extensive capital expansion. The longer the strategic process drags on, the more uncertain I become as to whether we will actually see a cash offer for the company, with a specific price per share to current shareholders. As mentioned in a previous post, there is a requirement that European airlines must have at least 50% European ownership and effective control. Could this be part of the explanation for how a potential solution will be structured? A possible scenario is that new capital comes from a larger international player, while current major European owners participate in a directed share issue to ensure that the ownership requirements continue to be met. In such a scenario, we small shareholders risk being heavily diluted and practically left on the sidelines, while the largest players secure further ownership and control. Naturally, I hope for a solution that also safeguards current shareholders, but I must admit that I am becoming increasingly skeptical as to whether a traditional cash-settled acquisition is the most probable outcome. What do the rest of you think? Is this a realistic scenario, or are there factors that suggest we might still receive a cash offer? Particularly interested in hearing your thoughts @manawa As I see it, you have provided many good and well-thought-out analyses along the way. Unfortunately, a war got in the way of the good path we were on. How do you assess the situation and the most likely outcomes now?
- ·16 t sittenWho can actually buy the company? In connection with the ongoing strategic process in Norse, I recently became a bit curious about one thing: Can an Asian airline buy all of Norse and at the same time retain the company's European traffic rights? After examining the regulations, it turns out that this is not so simple. Norse has a European operator structure and associated traffic rights, which can make the company attractive for Asian airlines that want greater access to the European market. According to EU/EEA regulations, more than 50 % of a European airline must be owned by EU/EEA interests, who must also have actual control over the company. An Asian player can therefore normally not buy 100 % of Norse and at the same time keep the European operating permits unchanged. An interesting example is Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), which recently entered into a wet lease agreement with Norse for two Boeing 787-9. A small fun fact is that PIA was recently privatized. An investor consortium led by Arif Habib took over control in June 2026. Here, well-capitalized owners stand behind, with a total investment commitment of around 180 billion Pakistani rupees, of which significant amounts will be used to strengthen and further develop the airline. If these investors see a strategic potential in Norse, PIA can in my assessment be an interesting candidate. They have already established a commercial collaboration through the wet lease agreement, and Norse can potentially provide access to a European operator platform, capacity and traffic rights. However, the ownership rules create some limitations. PIA can normally not take over the majority and the actual control over the European aviation business. An alternative could be to team up with European investors who retain majority ownership and control. It makes me wonder whether the strategic process might just as well end in a partnership or a shared ownership structure as a complete acquisition. Can PIA and their new well-capitalized owners be a relevant candidate if they see the value of Norse's European platform? This is naturally just speculation on my part, but I find the connection interesting, especially considering the timing of the privatization, the capital that has come in, and the recently concluded agreement between the companies. What do you think?Do you also drink in the middle of the week? Hehe... nah, I think the angle is good. I don't quite see where we who are today's owners stand in such a case. But, if PIA contributes to lifting the value in the company, then I recommend them to go for it!
- ·1 päivä sittenDemocrats triumph....end of war in the Middle East...oil down and Norse up. Simple? Hope so...🛫🛫🛫🚀🚀🚀💰💰💰
- 1 päivä sittenJulkaisu on poistettu.Who is pia? Thai lady? Democrats support war and despise Russia. We will see how the hare jumps.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | ||
| 150 | ||
| 186 280 | ||
| 25 | ||
| 10 000 |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 25.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti
77 päivää sitten
‧11 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 - tulosraportti 25.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 - tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 - tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 - tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 - tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 - tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
- ·6 min sittenWhat do the rest of you think about the outcome of the strategic process? Personally, I am starting to fear that we will end up with a solution where a larger, well-capitalized player comes in and takes over control of the company in cooperation with the current largest shareholders, through a directed share issue and extensive capital expansion. The longer the strategic process drags on, the more uncertain I become as to whether we will actually see a cash offer for the company, with a specific price per share to current shareholders. As mentioned in a previous post, there is a requirement that European airlines must have at least 50% European ownership and effective control. Could this be part of the explanation for how a potential solution will be structured? A possible scenario is that new capital comes from a larger international player, while current major European owners participate in a directed share issue to ensure that the ownership requirements continue to be met. In such a scenario, we small shareholders risk being heavily diluted and practically left on the sidelines, while the largest players secure further ownership and control. Naturally, I hope for a solution that also safeguards current shareholders, but I must admit that I am becoming increasingly skeptical as to whether a traditional cash-settled acquisition is the most probable outcome. What do the rest of you think? Is this a realistic scenario, or are there factors that suggest we might still receive a cash offer? Particularly interested in hearing your thoughts @manawa As I see it, you have provided many good and well-thought-out analyses along the way. Unfortunately, a war got in the way of the good path we were on. How do you assess the situation and the most likely outcomes now?
- ·16 t sittenWho can actually buy the company? In connection with the ongoing strategic process in Norse, I recently became a bit curious about one thing: Can an Asian airline buy all of Norse and at the same time retain the company's European traffic rights? After examining the regulations, it turns out that this is not so simple. Norse has a European operator structure and associated traffic rights, which can make the company attractive for Asian airlines that want greater access to the European market. According to EU/EEA regulations, more than 50 % of a European airline must be owned by EU/EEA interests, who must also have actual control over the company. An Asian player can therefore normally not buy 100 % of Norse and at the same time keep the European operating permits unchanged. An interesting example is Pakistan International Airlines (PIA), which recently entered into a wet lease agreement with Norse for two Boeing 787-9. A small fun fact is that PIA was recently privatized. An investor consortium led by Arif Habib took over control in June 2026. Here, well-capitalized owners stand behind, with a total investment commitment of around 180 billion Pakistani rupees, of which significant amounts will be used to strengthen and further develop the airline. If these investors see a strategic potential in Norse, PIA can in my assessment be an interesting candidate. They have already established a commercial collaboration through the wet lease agreement, and Norse can potentially provide access to a European operator platform, capacity and traffic rights. However, the ownership rules create some limitations. PIA can normally not take over the majority and the actual control over the European aviation business. An alternative could be to team up with European investors who retain majority ownership and control. It makes me wonder whether the strategic process might just as well end in a partnership or a shared ownership structure as a complete acquisition. Can PIA and their new well-capitalized owners be a relevant candidate if they see the value of Norse's European platform? This is naturally just speculation on my part, but I find the connection interesting, especially considering the timing of the privatization, the capital that has come in, and the recently concluded agreement between the companies. What do you think?Do you also drink in the middle of the week? Hehe... nah, I think the angle is good. I don't quite see where we who are today's owners stand in such a case. But, if PIA contributes to lifting the value in the company, then I recommend them to go for it!
- ·1 päivä sittenDemocrats triumph....end of war in the Middle East...oil down and Norse up. Simple? Hope so...🛫🛫🛫🚀🚀🚀💰💰💰
- 1 päivä sittenJulkaisu on poistettu.Who is pia? Thai lady? Democrats support war and despise Russia. We will see how the hare jumps.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | ||
| 150 | ||
| 186 280 | ||
| 25 | ||
| 10 000 |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Rahastoja ja ETF:iä jotka omistavat osaketta
Mikään rahasto ei ilmoita osaketta kymmenen suurimman omistuksensa joukossa.
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt