2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
71 päivää sitten
‧10 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
·1 t sittenNow: Investtech warns against, among others, Norse Atlantic. https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2026/07/31/8369352/gjor-endringer-i-portefoljen-advarer-mot-atte-aksjer
Based on the trend, is it taken into account that this is due to a share issue at an 80% discount? It's just garbage that comes out from these shoe lasts in Investtech.
·5 t sittenI think the Norse case looks interesting. The figures so far suggest that the ACMI/wet lease model is more profitable and predictable than operating a large proprietary route network. Norse has around 12 Boeing 787-9s and pays an estimated nearly 1 billion kroner in annual leasing, service, and other aircraft-related costs. This corresponds to approximately 80–90 million kroner per month for the entire fleet. The interesting thing is that the leasing agreements are said to be very favorable compared to today's market prices. Norse can thus lease out the aircraft at market price and retain the margin between the rental price and what the customer pays. This becomes particularly valuable when the availability of Dreamliners is limited and new aircraft are not expected to be delivered until around 2034–2035. With approximately ten years remaining on the leasing agreements, Norse therefore holds a potential competitive advantage. Management has previously estimated the value of the leasing agreements and Gatwick slots at around 3–6 billion kroner++ The company is currently valued at approximately 1.1 billion kroner at a share price of around 0.40 kroner. A price of 0.80 kroner would have resulted in a valuation of approximately 2.3 billion kroner. According to Arctic's price target 22.06.2026 I do not expect Q2 2026 to necessarily show a positive net result. Q3 is normally the strongest period for airlines, and in my assessment, it could be the quarter where Norse approaches break-even or turns a profit. The best thing Norse can do is probably to further shift its business model towards long-term and profitable ACMI agreements, while only retaining the most profitable proprietary routes. The largest investors have chosen to participate in the capital raise. There is no guarantee of success, but they have probably made more thorough assessments and had access to more information than ordinary small shareholders. For me, the key lies in one thing: Norse must prove that the favorable leasing agreements can be converted into lasting positive cash flow. If they manage that, today's valuation appears low. What do you think?
1 päivä sittenBe a bit grown-up and keep your observations about Aker and other (for Norse) completely irrelevant companies where they belong..You'd better enjoy yourselves with bickering on the thread under the respective companies. Thanks!
·1 päivä sittenYou should apologize to everyone who warned you, now you're in a tight spot. Take out the money and learn from it.That is so wrong jonjohansen. I have earned a lot on Norse and the shares I have left are free. So no matter when I sell the last ones, I will just earn even more.
·24.7. · MuokattuPeople follow others' opinions about stocks all the time, and it's almost always a bad idea. You have no idea what the other person is holding. A guy on Twitter, a colleague at work, or an analyst on TV has completely different figures in their account, a different time horizon, and a different stomach for risk than you. What's fine for them might be completely wrong for you. Many of those who shout loudly have their own interests. They own the stock themselves, or have shorted it, get paid to talk about it, or simply profit from you trading. When they say "buy now", it's not certain they themselves are holding it; they might well be selling at the same time. When they shout "sell now", it could just as easily be that they are buying up cheaper shares while scaring others out. When everyone follows the same tips, it quickly becomes herd mentality. On the way up, the price is pushed higher without the company actually becoming more valuable. On the way down, the mood turns, and everyone runs for the door at the same time. Those who entered late on the upturn, or sold too late on the downturn, are left with the loss. We have seen it time and time again. When something is talked about everywhere, it's usually already priced in. Professionals have traded long ago. You then often buy or sell at a price that has already accounted for the "good news" or the panic. And if you don't understand why you own the stock yourself, you also don't know when it's time to sell. Then emotions quickly take over, FOMO on the way up, panic on the way down. What actually works better for most people is to decide what you yourself can tolerate, how long you should hold, and then build something simple and diversified. Preferably index funds if you don't want to dig into numbers all the time. Or do proper research yourself if you really want to pick individual stocks. Others' opinions are noise. Your own plan and your own understanding are what keep you away from the biggest mistakes.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
71 päivää sitten
‧10 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenNow: Investtech warns against, among others, Norse Atlantic. https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2026/07/31/8369352/gjor-endringer-i-portefoljen-advarer-mot-atte-aksjerBased on the trend, is it taken into account that this is due to a share issue at an 80% discount? It's just garbage that comes out from these shoe lasts in Investtech.
- ·5 t sittenI think the Norse case looks interesting. The figures so far suggest that the ACMI/wet lease model is more profitable and predictable than operating a large proprietary route network. Norse has around 12 Boeing 787-9s and pays an estimated nearly 1 billion kroner in annual leasing, service, and other aircraft-related costs. This corresponds to approximately 80–90 million kroner per month for the entire fleet. The interesting thing is that the leasing agreements are said to be very favorable compared to today's market prices. Norse can thus lease out the aircraft at market price and retain the margin between the rental price and what the customer pays. This becomes particularly valuable when the availability of Dreamliners is limited and new aircraft are not expected to be delivered until around 2034–2035. With approximately ten years remaining on the leasing agreements, Norse therefore holds a potential competitive advantage. Management has previously estimated the value of the leasing agreements and Gatwick slots at around 3–6 billion kroner++ The company is currently valued at approximately 1.1 billion kroner at a share price of around 0.40 kroner. A price of 0.80 kroner would have resulted in a valuation of approximately 2.3 billion kroner. According to Arctic's price target 22.06.2026 I do not expect Q2 2026 to necessarily show a positive net result. Q3 is normally the strongest period for airlines, and in my assessment, it could be the quarter where Norse approaches break-even or turns a profit. The best thing Norse can do is probably to further shift its business model towards long-term and profitable ACMI agreements, while only retaining the most profitable proprietary routes. The largest investors have chosen to participate in the capital raise. There is no guarantee of success, but they have probably made more thorough assessments and had access to more information than ordinary small shareholders. For me, the key lies in one thing: Norse must prove that the favorable leasing agreements can be converted into lasting positive cash flow. If they manage that, today's valuation appears low. What do you think?
- 1 päivä sittenBe a bit grown-up and keep your observations about Aker and other (for Norse) completely irrelevant companies where they belong..You'd better enjoy yourselves with bickering on the thread under the respective companies. Thanks!
- ·1 päivä sittenYou should apologize to everyone who warned you, now you're in a tight spot. Take out the money and learn from it.That is so wrong jonjohansen. I have earned a lot on Norse and the shares I have left are free. So no matter when I sell the last ones, I will just earn even more.
- ·24.7. · MuokattuPeople follow others' opinions about stocks all the time, and it's almost always a bad idea. You have no idea what the other person is holding. A guy on Twitter, a colleague at work, or an analyst on TV has completely different figures in their account, a different time horizon, and a different stomach for risk than you. What's fine for them might be completely wrong for you. Many of those who shout loudly have their own interests. They own the stock themselves, or have shorted it, get paid to talk about it, or simply profit from you trading. When they say "buy now", it's not certain they themselves are holding it; they might well be selling at the same time. When they shout "sell now", it could just as easily be that they are buying up cheaper shares while scaring others out. When everyone follows the same tips, it quickly becomes herd mentality. On the way up, the price is pushed higher without the company actually becoming more valuable. On the way down, the mood turns, and everyone runs for the door at the same time. Those who entered late on the upturn, or sold too late on the downturn, are left with the loss. We have seen it time and time again. When something is talked about everywhere, it's usually already priced in. Professionals have traded long ago. You then often buy or sell at a price that has already accounted for the "good news" or the panic. And if you don't understand why you own the stock yourself, you also don't know when it's time to sell. Then emotions quickly take over, FOMO on the way up, panic on the way down. What actually works better for most people is to decide what you yourself can tolerate, how long you should hold, and then build something simple and diversified. Preferably index funds if you don't want to dig into numbers all the time. Or do proper research yourself if you really want to pick individual stocks. Others' opinions are noise. Your own plan and your own understanding are what keep you away from the biggest mistakes.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5.2025 |
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
71 päivää sitten
‧10 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 | ||
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- ·1 t sittenNow: Investtech warns against, among others, Norse Atlantic. https://www.finansavisen.no/finans/2026/07/31/8369352/gjor-endringer-i-portefoljen-advarer-mot-atte-aksjerBased on the trend, is it taken into account that this is due to a share issue at an 80% discount? It's just garbage that comes out from these shoe lasts in Investtech.
- ·5 t sittenI think the Norse case looks interesting. The figures so far suggest that the ACMI/wet lease model is more profitable and predictable than operating a large proprietary route network. Norse has around 12 Boeing 787-9s and pays an estimated nearly 1 billion kroner in annual leasing, service, and other aircraft-related costs. This corresponds to approximately 80–90 million kroner per month for the entire fleet. The interesting thing is that the leasing agreements are said to be very favorable compared to today's market prices. Norse can thus lease out the aircraft at market price and retain the margin between the rental price and what the customer pays. This becomes particularly valuable when the availability of Dreamliners is limited and new aircraft are not expected to be delivered until around 2034–2035. With approximately ten years remaining on the leasing agreements, Norse therefore holds a potential competitive advantage. Management has previously estimated the value of the leasing agreements and Gatwick slots at around 3–6 billion kroner++ The company is currently valued at approximately 1.1 billion kroner at a share price of around 0.40 kroner. A price of 0.80 kroner would have resulted in a valuation of approximately 2.3 billion kroner. According to Arctic's price target 22.06.2026 I do not expect Q2 2026 to necessarily show a positive net result. Q3 is normally the strongest period for airlines, and in my assessment, it could be the quarter where Norse approaches break-even or turns a profit. The best thing Norse can do is probably to further shift its business model towards long-term and profitable ACMI agreements, while only retaining the most profitable proprietary routes. The largest investors have chosen to participate in the capital raise. There is no guarantee of success, but they have probably made more thorough assessments and had access to more information than ordinary small shareholders. For me, the key lies in one thing: Norse must prove that the favorable leasing agreements can be converted into lasting positive cash flow. If they manage that, today's valuation appears low. What do you think?
- 1 päivä sittenBe a bit grown-up and keep your observations about Aker and other (for Norse) completely irrelevant companies where they belong..You'd better enjoy yourselves with bickering on the thread under the respective companies. Thanks!
- ·1 päivä sittenYou should apologize to everyone who warned you, now you're in a tight spot. Take out the money and learn from it.That is so wrong jonjohansen. I have earned a lot on Norse and the shares I have left are free. So no matter when I sell the last ones, I will just earn even more.
- ·24.7. · MuokattuPeople follow others' opinions about stocks all the time, and it's almost always a bad idea. You have no idea what the other person is holding. A guy on Twitter, a colleague at work, or an analyst on TV has completely different figures in their account, a different time horizon, and a different stomach for risk than you. What's fine for them might be completely wrong for you. Many of those who shout loudly have their own interests. They own the stock themselves, or have shorted it, get paid to talk about it, or simply profit from you trading. When they say "buy now", it's not certain they themselves are holding it; they might well be selling at the same time. When they shout "sell now", it could just as easily be that they are buying up cheaper shares while scaring others out. When everyone follows the same tips, it quickly becomes herd mentality. On the way up, the price is pushed higher without the company actually becoming more valuable. On the way down, the mood turns, and everyone runs for the door at the same time. Those who entered late on the upturn, or sold too late on the downturn, are left with the loss. We have seen it time and time again. When something is talked about everywhere, it's usually already priced in. Professionals have traded long ago. You then often buy or sell at a price that has already accounted for the "good news" or the panic. And if you don't understand why you own the stock yourself, you also don't know when it's time to sell. Then emotions quickly take over, FOMO on the way up, panic on the way down. What actually works better for most people is to decide what you yourself can tolerate, how long you should hold, and then build something simple and diversified. Preferably index funds if you don't want to dig into numbers all the time. Or do proper research yourself if you really want to pick individual stocks. Others' opinions are noise. Your own plan and your own understanding are what keep you away from the biggest mistakes.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt