2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
Tänään
‧11 min
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
28 min sittenI'm out, good luck everyone. I'll keep an eye on it and maybe buy back in but right now I'm taking what's left of my investment and licking my wounds.
·32 min sittenA little comfort for those of you who are in the red with Norse: Bjørn Tore Larsen himself has an estimated unrealized loss of around 550–600 million kroner since the start, based on the capital he has invested and today's share price. So I hardly believe this is a "voluntary project" for him. He has very strong financial incentives to get Norse back on track, reduce his own loss and simultaneously the shareholders'. If one also looks at the financing and the loan that was recently taken up, I believe there is a clear strategic thought behind this. It's about buying the company time and room to maneuver to implement the plan, not just about keeping operations going from month to month. In other words, Larsen has significant skin in the game. Now it remains to be seen if the strategy actually manages to create value again.
BTL has a much higher GAV than me, so I think that if he gets something back, it will probably be a plus for me.
·1 t sittenA bit interesting timing around the new loan I think the new loan of USD 52 mill. is worth looking into a bit closer. Norse just raised money through the share issue, has restructured operations, and we are already well into Q3. Nevertheless, they are now securing additional financing on quite expensive terms. Could it be more than just a need for liquidity? With several interested parties involved in the formal strategic process, NDAs signed, and indicative proposals expected in H2, a possible thought could be to secure enough "runway" so that Norse is not forced into a situation where a buyer can wait for a potential bankruptcy estate and buy cheap. That is: ensure that the company actually has time to carry out a strategic process and potentially be sold as a company – not as a bankruptcy estate. Just a thought, but I find the timing interesting.
Norse – is this really a sustainable business model? I think it's time to look beyond the headlines about high load factors and "record" unit revenue. Norse has now secured USD 52 million in secured financing. And the terms are, to say the least, not very favorable for shareholders: USD 52 mill. nominal loan Norse only receives 95 % of par, i.e., approx. USD 49,4 mill. in gross liquidity 15 % annual interest Maturity already in May 2027 Repayment at 103 % of par, i.e., USD 53,56 mill. The loan is secured, so lenders have collateral in the company's assets In addition, lenders have a 3 % compensation linked to the equity value upon change of control/sale. This is not cheap financing. It is expensive capital with significant security for the lenders. Based solely on the stated terms, we are talking about millions of dollars in financing costs in a very short time. Norse must therefore both pay 15 % interest, repay 103 % of the loan's nominal value, and they have already provided collateral to the lenders. And here comes the big question: Where will the money for the repayment come from?
·1 t sittenI see it's being written that the company now has 0 value, so I'm asking about these confidentiality agreements that have been entered into. Is this fabricated or are the speculators just good Samaritans with fat wallets?
Shouldn't the market price the stock at 0 and adjust the stock down more sharply in advance of the results. Not surprising with a large loss this q. I have a buy order at 31 øre.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
Tänään
‧11 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 28 min sittenI'm out, good luck everyone. I'll keep an eye on it and maybe buy back in but right now I'm taking what's left of my investment and licking my wounds.
- ·32 min sittenA little comfort for those of you who are in the red with Norse: Bjørn Tore Larsen himself has an estimated unrealized loss of around 550–600 million kroner since the start, based on the capital he has invested and today's share price. So I hardly believe this is a "voluntary project" for him. He has very strong financial incentives to get Norse back on track, reduce his own loss and simultaneously the shareholders'. If one also looks at the financing and the loan that was recently taken up, I believe there is a clear strategic thought behind this. It's about buying the company time and room to maneuver to implement the plan, not just about keeping operations going from month to month. In other words, Larsen has significant skin in the game. Now it remains to be seen if the strategy actually manages to create value again.BTL has a much higher GAV than me, so I think that if he gets something back, it will probably be a plus for me.
- ·1 t sittenA bit interesting timing around the new loan I think the new loan of USD 52 mill. is worth looking into a bit closer. Norse just raised money through the share issue, has restructured operations, and we are already well into Q3. Nevertheless, they are now securing additional financing on quite expensive terms. Could it be more than just a need for liquidity? With several interested parties involved in the formal strategic process, NDAs signed, and indicative proposals expected in H2, a possible thought could be to secure enough "runway" so that Norse is not forced into a situation where a buyer can wait for a potential bankruptcy estate and buy cheap. That is: ensure that the company actually has time to carry out a strategic process and potentially be sold as a company – not as a bankruptcy estate. Just a thought, but I find the timing interesting.Norse – is this really a sustainable business model? I think it's time to look beyond the headlines about high load factors and "record" unit revenue. Norse has now secured USD 52 million in secured financing. And the terms are, to say the least, not very favorable for shareholders: USD 52 mill. nominal loan Norse only receives 95 % of par, i.e., approx. USD 49,4 mill. in gross liquidity 15 % annual interest Maturity already in May 2027 Repayment at 103 % of par, i.e., USD 53,56 mill. The loan is secured, so lenders have collateral in the company's assets In addition, lenders have a 3 % compensation linked to the equity value upon change of control/sale. This is not cheap financing. It is expensive capital with significant security for the lenders. Based solely on the stated terms, we are talking about millions of dollars in financing costs in a very short time. Norse must therefore both pay 15 % interest, repay 103 % of the loan's nominal value, and they have already provided collateral to the lenders. And here comes the big question: Where will the money for the repayment come from?
- ·1 t sittenI see it's being written that the company now has 0 value, so I'm asking about these confidentiality agreements that have been entered into. Is this fabricated or are the speculators just good Samaritans with fat wallets?Shouldn't the market price the stock at 0 and adjust the stock down more sharply in advance of the results. Not surprising with a large loss this q. I have a buy order at 31 øre.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt
Asiakkaat katsoivat myös
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti
UUTTA
Tänään
‧11 min
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Datan lähde: Quartr| Seuraava tapahtuma | |
|---|---|
2026 Q3 -tulosraportti 25.11. |
| Menneet tapahtumat | ||
|---|---|---|
2026 Q2 -tulosraportti 20.8. | ||
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti 21.5. | ||
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti 26.2. | ||
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti 26.11.2025 | ||
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti 19.8.2025 |
Foorumi
Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
- 28 min sittenI'm out, good luck everyone. I'll keep an eye on it and maybe buy back in but right now I'm taking what's left of my investment and licking my wounds.
- ·32 min sittenA little comfort for those of you who are in the red with Norse: Bjørn Tore Larsen himself has an estimated unrealized loss of around 550–600 million kroner since the start, based on the capital he has invested and today's share price. So I hardly believe this is a "voluntary project" for him. He has very strong financial incentives to get Norse back on track, reduce his own loss and simultaneously the shareholders'. If one also looks at the financing and the loan that was recently taken up, I believe there is a clear strategic thought behind this. It's about buying the company time and room to maneuver to implement the plan, not just about keeping operations going from month to month. In other words, Larsen has significant skin in the game. Now it remains to be seen if the strategy actually manages to create value again.BTL has a much higher GAV than me, so I think that if he gets something back, it will probably be a plus for me.
- ·1 t sittenA bit interesting timing around the new loan I think the new loan of USD 52 mill. is worth looking into a bit closer. Norse just raised money through the share issue, has restructured operations, and we are already well into Q3. Nevertheless, they are now securing additional financing on quite expensive terms. Could it be more than just a need for liquidity? With several interested parties involved in the formal strategic process, NDAs signed, and indicative proposals expected in H2, a possible thought could be to secure enough "runway" so that Norse is not forced into a situation where a buyer can wait for a potential bankruptcy estate and buy cheap. That is: ensure that the company actually has time to carry out a strategic process and potentially be sold as a company – not as a bankruptcy estate. Just a thought, but I find the timing interesting.Norse – is this really a sustainable business model? I think it's time to look beyond the headlines about high load factors and "record" unit revenue. Norse has now secured USD 52 million in secured financing. And the terms are, to say the least, not very favorable for shareholders: USD 52 mill. nominal loan Norse only receives 95 % of par, i.e., approx. USD 49,4 mill. in gross liquidity 15 % annual interest Maturity already in May 2027 Repayment at 103 % of par, i.e., USD 53,56 mill. The loan is secured, so lenders have collateral in the company's assets In addition, lenders have a 3 % compensation linked to the equity value upon change of control/sale. This is not cheap financing. It is expensive capital with significant security for the lenders. Based solely on the stated terms, we are talking about millions of dollars in financing costs in a very short time. Norse must therefore both pay 15 % interest, repay 103 % of the loan's nominal value, and they have already provided collateral to the lenders. And here comes the big question: Where will the money for the repayment come from?
- ·1 t sittenI see it's being written that the company now has 0 value, so I'm asking about these confidentiality agreements that have been entered into. Is this fabricated or are the speculators just good Samaritans with fat wallets?Shouldn't the market price the stock at 0 and adjust the stock down more sharply in advance of the results. Not surprising with a large loss this q. I have a buy order at 31 øre.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
Ei dataa
Viimeisimmät kaupat
| Aika | Hinta | Määrä | Ostaja | Myyjä |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | - | - |
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Välittäjätilasto
Dataa ei löytynyt