Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Puuuuuha, just read the announcement, what a load of investor gas or at least with a nice IR coating - many thoughts and visions but nothing concrete in a situation where one has to go out and ask for money for survival.
There will be a strong exodus from the stock, so it's out now or fully along for the ride (north or south). Therefore, existing investors close to the company are almost forced along.
When a company has burned so many millions for years and could not deliver anything sensible, and still only points to 10% EBIT as a future goal and even “someday”!!!
It is a sign that the business model is not very scalable – or that the cost base is structurally too high. That worries me, and it should also worry a board of directors a lot.
Growth case - one directly admits it is not, but merely a minor mediocre Danish industrial company - that's a shame. More focus in strategy, restructuring of the business model, and management.
Oh well… I suppose they have a decisive board chairman and meanwhile I'll keep an eye out for just a little rescue sale.
That type of announcement about delivering something to a larger well-known brands can be own branding, more than generating profit. Surely LEGO can manage without one of their measuring devices. We don't know the order size (x mio.) if it's even an order. When I read the announcement, it might as well look like they are delivering it to show what they can do. LEGO won't pay overprice if a competitor has a similar measuring device.
I completely agree with your post. I wasn't aware there was talk of a “new financing round” when there was an IPO. The IPO was precisely for scaling and expanding into Europe…. I don't remember reading anything about that, but I don't really want to read the IPO script again either.
I don't find it appealing to invest in a company that is at its lowest price level, and the financial statements clearly show that they cannot make money.
@MadisonSq: I don't think you're right about the lack of sales profiles, as previously written, it takes a very long time to get in with companies, but time will tell who of us is right.
And yes, for a long time it has been a problem to get reasonable sales vs. development costs, and the thought that one has spread oneself too thin has indeed crossed my mind several times, but I also believe it has been a conscious choice, and yes, now this venture must soon prove its worth.
Regarding inventory/demo setups, that was actually also something they were well aware needed to be addressed.
As in all industries I have experienced where veeeery long decision-making processes have been the norm, it is typically also those who would have liked it delivered yesterday. And as can be read in the press release, some of the money will specifically go to this.
As previously written, I believe there will be more sales / ARR and less development costs, and that they will thereby begin to generate profit.
@born1956: see my reply to MadisonSq, but I can understand your skepticism when looking at their historical cashburn.
@111111: Thanks for the kind words :-)
To your questions: no, they didn't say anything about the possible capital increase, since they have to announce that kind of thing via a press release, since everyone has to have access to that kind of information at the same time.
But it's safe to say that if there is a capital increase / issue, it will be within approx. the next 5 months.
That said, it is not even certain that there will be an issue for existing shareholders, if "a rich uncle" comes along and throws in the bag of money they want, they have the option of issuing new shares at market price without pre-emptive rights for existing shareholders, as stated in the press release:
"Based on Q-Interline's articles of association §5.1, which deals with the board of directors' authorization to increase the share capital, the board of directors has decided to explore the possibilities of implementing a capital increase, either by issuing new shares at a preferential price with pre-emptive rights to existing shareholders, or by issuing new shares at market price without pre-emptive rights for existing shareholders."
That said, it will probably end up with an issue, as I think that the "rich uncles" out there are not that risk-averse at the moment, and I don't see that picture changing within the next 5 months.
1
Näytä vielä 5 kommenttia
Näytä enemmän
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Q-Interline A/S: Q-Interline indgår treårig rammeaftale med TINE – Norges største mejerikoncern
19 elo 07.34
∙
Lehdistötiedote
Q-Interline indgår treårig rammeaftale med TINE – Norges største mejerikoncern
18 elo 19.05
∙
Osakeuutinen
Q-Interline A/S: Q-Interline nedjusterer forventningerne til årets omsætning og driftsresultat. Markant fremgang i ARR-salget kan ikke opveje vigende salg af analysesystemer i første halvår
18 elo 19.05
∙
Lehdistötiedote
Q-Interline nedjusterer forventningerne til årets omsætning og driftsresultat. Markant fremgang i ARR-salget kan ikke opveje vigende salg af analysesystemer i første halvår
13 elo 11.50
∙
Osakeuutinen
Q-Interline A/S: Q-Interline underskriver global leverandøraftale med førende aktør inden for produktion af spiseolier
13 elo 11.50
∙
Lehdistötiedote
Q-Interline underskriver global leverandøraftale med førende aktør inden for produktion af spiseolier
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Q-Interline A/S: Q-Interline indgår treårig rammeaftale med TINE – Norges største mejerikoncern
19 elo 07.34
∙
Lehdistötiedote
Q-Interline indgår treårig rammeaftale med TINE – Norges største mejerikoncern
18 elo 19.05
∙
Osakeuutinen
Q-Interline A/S: Q-Interline nedjusterer forventningerne til årets omsætning og driftsresultat. Markant fremgang i ARR-salget kan ikke opveje vigende salg af analysesystemer i første halvår
18 elo 19.05
∙
Lehdistötiedote
Q-Interline nedjusterer forventningerne til årets omsætning og driftsresultat. Markant fremgang i ARR-salget kan ikke opveje vigende salg af analysesystemer i første halvår
13 elo 11.50
∙
Osakeuutinen
Q-Interline A/S: Q-Interline underskriver global leverandøraftale med førende aktør inden for produktion af spiseolier
13 elo 11.50
∙
Lehdistötiedote
Q-Interline underskriver global leverandøraftale med førende aktør inden for produktion af spiseolier
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Puuuuuha, just read the announcement, what a load of investor gas or at least with a nice IR coating - many thoughts and visions but nothing concrete in a situation where one has to go out and ask for money for survival.
There will be a strong exodus from the stock, so it's out now or fully along for the ride (north or south). Therefore, existing investors close to the company are almost forced along.
When a company has burned so many millions for years and could not deliver anything sensible, and still only points to 10% EBIT as a future goal and even “someday”!!!
It is a sign that the business model is not very scalable – or that the cost base is structurally too high. That worries me, and it should also worry a board of directors a lot.
Growth case - one directly admits it is not, but merely a minor mediocre Danish industrial company - that's a shame. More focus in strategy, restructuring of the business model, and management.
Oh well… I suppose they have a decisive board chairman and meanwhile I'll keep an eye out for just a little rescue sale.
That type of announcement about delivering something to a larger well-known brands can be own branding, more than generating profit. Surely LEGO can manage without one of their measuring devices. We don't know the order size (x mio.) if it's even an order. When I read the announcement, it might as well look like they are delivering it to show what they can do. LEGO won't pay overprice if a competitor has a similar measuring device.
I completely agree with your post. I wasn't aware there was talk of a “new financing round” when there was an IPO. The IPO was precisely for scaling and expanding into Europe…. I don't remember reading anything about that, but I don't really want to read the IPO script again either.
I don't find it appealing to invest in a company that is at its lowest price level, and the financial statements clearly show that they cannot make money.
@MadisonSq: I don't think you're right about the lack of sales profiles, as previously written, it takes a very long time to get in with companies, but time will tell who of us is right.
And yes, for a long time it has been a problem to get reasonable sales vs. development costs, and the thought that one has spread oneself too thin has indeed crossed my mind several times, but I also believe it has been a conscious choice, and yes, now this venture must soon prove its worth.
Regarding inventory/demo setups, that was actually also something they were well aware needed to be addressed.
As in all industries I have experienced where veeeery long decision-making processes have been the norm, it is typically also those who would have liked it delivered yesterday. And as can be read in the press release, some of the money will specifically go to this.
As previously written, I believe there will be more sales / ARR and less development costs, and that they will thereby begin to generate profit.
@born1956: see my reply to MadisonSq, but I can understand your skepticism when looking at their historical cashburn.
@111111: Thanks for the kind words :-)
To your questions: no, they didn't say anything about the possible capital increase, since they have to announce that kind of thing via a press release, since everyone has to have access to that kind of information at the same time.
But it's safe to say that if there is a capital increase / issue, it will be within approx. the next 5 months.
That said, it is not even certain that there will be an issue for existing shareholders, if "a rich uncle" comes along and throws in the bag of money they want, they have the option of issuing new shares at market price without pre-emptive rights for existing shareholders, as stated in the press release:
"Based on Q-Interline's articles of association §5.1, which deals with the board of directors' authorization to increase the share capital, the board of directors has decided to explore the possibilities of implementing a capital increase, either by issuing new shares at a preferential price with pre-emptive rights to existing shareholders, or by issuing new shares at market price without pre-emptive rights for existing shareholders."
That said, it will probably end up with an issue, as I think that the "rich uncles" out there are not that risk-averse at the moment, and I don't see that picture changing within the next 5 months.
1
Näytä vielä 5 kommenttia
Näytä enemmän
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Denmark
Määrä
Osto
1 700
3,8
Myynti
Määrä
3,88
250
Viimeisimmät kaupat
Näytä enemmän
Aika
Hinta
Määrä
Ostaja
Myyjä
3,6
169
-
-
3,6
381
-
-
3,6
19
-
-
3,3
11
-
-
3,14
3 369
-
-
Ylin
3,8
VWAP
3,24
Alin
3,14
VaihtoMäärä
0 4 276
VWAP
3,24
Ylin
3,8
Alin
3,14
VaihtoMäärä
0 4 276
Tietoa osakekaupankäyntiin liittyvistä riskeistä
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.
Q-Interline A/S: Q-Interline indgår treårig rammeaftale med TINE – Norges største mejerikoncern
19 elo 07.34
∙
Lehdistötiedote
Q-Interline indgår treårig rammeaftale med TINE – Norges største mejerikoncern
18 elo 19.05
∙
Osakeuutinen
Q-Interline A/S: Q-Interline nedjusterer forventningerne til årets omsætning og driftsresultat. Markant fremgang i ARR-salget kan ikke opveje vigende salg af analysesystemer i første halvår
18 elo 19.05
∙
Lehdistötiedote
Q-Interline nedjusterer forventningerne til årets omsætning og driftsresultat. Markant fremgang i ARR-salget kan ikke opveje vigende salg af analysesystemer i første halvår
13 elo 11.50
∙
Osakeuutinen
Q-Interline A/S: Q-Interline underskriver global leverandøraftale med førende aktør inden for produktion af spiseolier
13 elo 11.50
∙
Lehdistötiedote
Q-Interline underskriver global leverandøraftale med førende aktør inden for produktion af spiseolier
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.
Yhtiötapahtumat
Näytä kaikki
Seuraava tapahtuma
Sijoittajakalenteri ei ole saatavilla
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 H1 -tulosraportti
21.8.
2024 H2 -tulosraportti
14.3.
2024 H1 -tulosraportti
21.8.2024
2023 H2 -tulosraportti
14.3.2024
2023 H1 -tulosraportti
21.8.2023
Datan lähde: Quartr
Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi
Sertifikaatit
Shareville
Liity keskusteluun SharevillessäShareville on aktiivisten yksityissijoittajien yhteisö, jossa voit seurata muiden asiakkaiden kaupankäyntiä ja omistuksia.
Puuuuuha, just read the announcement, what a load of investor gas or at least with a nice IR coating - many thoughts and visions but nothing concrete in a situation where one has to go out and ask for money for survival.
There will be a strong exodus from the stock, so it's out now or fully along for the ride (north or south). Therefore, existing investors close to the company are almost forced along.
When a company has burned so many millions for years and could not deliver anything sensible, and still only points to 10% EBIT as a future goal and even “someday”!!!
It is a sign that the business model is not very scalable – or that the cost base is structurally too high. That worries me, and it should also worry a board of directors a lot.
Growth case - one directly admits it is not, but merely a minor mediocre Danish industrial company - that's a shame. More focus in strategy, restructuring of the business model, and management.
Oh well… I suppose they have a decisive board chairman and meanwhile I'll keep an eye out for just a little rescue sale.
That type of announcement about delivering something to a larger well-known brands can be own branding, more than generating profit. Surely LEGO can manage without one of their measuring devices. We don't know the order size (x mio.) if it's even an order. When I read the announcement, it might as well look like they are delivering it to show what they can do. LEGO won't pay overprice if a competitor has a similar measuring device.
I completely agree with your post. I wasn't aware there was talk of a “new financing round” when there was an IPO. The IPO was precisely for scaling and expanding into Europe…. I don't remember reading anything about that, but I don't really want to read the IPO script again either.
I don't find it appealing to invest in a company that is at its lowest price level, and the financial statements clearly show that they cannot make money.
@MadisonSq: I don't think you're right about the lack of sales profiles, as previously written, it takes a very long time to get in with companies, but time will tell who of us is right.
And yes, for a long time it has been a problem to get reasonable sales vs. development costs, and the thought that one has spread oneself too thin has indeed crossed my mind several times, but I also believe it has been a conscious choice, and yes, now this venture must soon prove its worth.
Regarding inventory/demo setups, that was actually also something they were well aware needed to be addressed.
As in all industries I have experienced where veeeery long decision-making processes have been the norm, it is typically also those who would have liked it delivered yesterday. And as can be read in the press release, some of the money will specifically go to this.
As previously written, I believe there will be more sales / ARR and less development costs, and that they will thereby begin to generate profit.
@born1956: see my reply to MadisonSq, but I can understand your skepticism when looking at their historical cashburn.
@111111: Thanks for the kind words :-)
To your questions: no, they didn't say anything about the possible capital increase, since they have to announce that kind of thing via a press release, since everyone has to have access to that kind of information at the same time.
But it's safe to say that if there is a capital increase / issue, it will be within approx. the next 5 months.
That said, it is not even certain that there will be an issue for existing shareholders, if "a rich uncle" comes along and throws in the bag of money they want, they have the option of issuing new shares at market price without pre-emptive rights for existing shareholders, as stated in the press release:
"Based on Q-Interline's articles of association §5.1, which deals with the board of directors' authorization to increase the share capital, the board of directors has decided to explore the possibilities of implementing a capital increase, either by issuing new shares at a preferential price with pre-emptive rights to existing shareholders, or by issuing new shares at market price without pre-emptive rights for existing shareholders."
That said, it will probably end up with an issue, as I think that the "rich uncles" out there are not that risk-averse at the moment, and I don't see that picture changing within the next 5 months.
1
Näytä vielä 5 kommenttia
Näytä enemmän
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Sharevillen käyttäjiltä, eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.
Tarjoustasot
First North Denmark
Määrä
Osto
1 700
3,8
Myynti
Määrä
3,88
250
Viimeisimmät kaupat
Näytä enemmän
Aika
Hinta
Määrä
Ostaja
Myyjä
3,6
169
-
-
3,6
381
-
-
3,6
19
-
-
3,3
11
-
-
3,14
3 369
-
-
Ylin
3,8
VWAP
3,24
Alin
3,14
VaihtoMäärä
0 4 276
VWAP
3,24
Ylin
3,8
Alin
3,14
VaihtoMäärä
0 4 276
Tietoa osakekaupankäyntiin liittyvistä riskeistä
Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.