Siirry pääsisältöön
Käyttämääsi selainta ei enää tueta – lue lisää.
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
Ylin-
Alin-
Vaihto-
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
60 päivää sitten

Tarjoustasot

NorwayEuronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
4 000--
3 500--
2 000--
14--
25 451--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
28.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
13.3.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
21.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
27.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
28.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
14.3.2025

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 1 t sitten
    ·
    1 t sitten
    ·
    Can anyone imagine a scenario where the result of the strategic review leads to the market pricing HAV lower?
    2 min sitten
    ·
    2 min sitten
    ·
    Not really
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    3 t sitten
    ·
    As if Hav wasn't already undervalued at sale, the future looks bright with regard to growth as well: https://e24.no/energi-og-klima/i/Pd5jdp/nye-klimakrav-til-offshoreskip?utm_source=iosapp&utm_medium=share
    2 t sitten
    ·
    2 t sitten
    ·
    Regulations and requirements will be a good driver for HAV's services and products, the EU is also pushing hard in the same direction.
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    3 t sitten
    ·
    Tests 14 again, last was probably July 2022
    1 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    It looks like a floor is forming at 14,- now.
  • 8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Asked ChatGPT to make an assessment What do you think is a realistic price for HAV Group as a whole from a larger player? Purely strategically, I think HAV Group looks like a typical company where the stock market value can be significantly lower than what an industrial buyer would actually be willing to pay. If I were to realistically speculate on a whole company bid in today's market, I might think something like this: low/realistic floor: ~1.2–1.5 billion NOK more likely industrial scenario: ~1.8–2.5 billion NOK aggressive strategic bid: 3 billion+ if several players see large synergies That sounds like a lot relative to how HAV has historically been priced on the stock exchange. But that's precisely why such "strategic reviews" often occur. When I roughly sum up the parts in my head: NES / Energy Design & Smart Control: maybe 1–1.5+ billion alone in an industrial sale HAV Design: maybe 200–400 million in the current cycle HAV Hydrogen: maybe low financial value now, but strategic option value ballast/water treatment: still value, service base, installed base expertise environment + customers + backlog + system integration: often underestimated on the stock exchange What makes HAV interesting is that they have actually built something resembling a complete green maritime technology platform: design electrical energy systems control/automation hydrogen integration maritime approvals/regulatory competence There are not many such environments in the Nordics. And if a large player wants to quickly buy into green maritime technology, it is often cheaper to acquire an existing environment than to build everything themselves over 5–10 years.
    8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    If one had asked AI the same regarding the Valuation of SEAM in November 25, one would probably have gotten many strange answers then too. The fact is that SEAM was sold for 2bn... NES has better Margins and is on track this year for quite similar revenue. So that the value of NES at least can be between 1.5-2bn is completely realistic.
    8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Sounds good, actually. It's way beyond today's mcap..
  • 8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Nice development despite low volume. Are we sniffing at 14,- before the weekend?
    8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Note that selling hardly occurs downwards. It is low volume, but buyer must meet seller in most transactions. That bodes well for the price development. One should also not rule out that some of the larger players suddenly place a block purchase, we have seen some instances of that recently. Such a purchase alone can lift the price a lot.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
60 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 1 t sitten
    ·
    1 t sitten
    ·
    Can anyone imagine a scenario where the result of the strategic review leads to the market pricing HAV lower?
    2 min sitten
    ·
    2 min sitten
    ·
    Not really
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    3 t sitten
    ·
    As if Hav wasn't already undervalued at sale, the future looks bright with regard to growth as well: https://e24.no/energi-og-klima/i/Pd5jdp/nye-klimakrav-til-offshoreskip?utm_source=iosapp&utm_medium=share
    2 t sitten
    ·
    2 t sitten
    ·
    Regulations and requirements will be a good driver for HAV's services and products, the EU is also pushing hard in the same direction.
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    3 t sitten
    ·
    Tests 14 again, last was probably July 2022
    1 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    It looks like a floor is forming at 14,- now.
  • 8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Asked ChatGPT to make an assessment What do you think is a realistic price for HAV Group as a whole from a larger player? Purely strategically, I think HAV Group looks like a typical company where the stock market value can be significantly lower than what an industrial buyer would actually be willing to pay. If I were to realistically speculate on a whole company bid in today's market, I might think something like this: low/realistic floor: ~1.2–1.5 billion NOK more likely industrial scenario: ~1.8–2.5 billion NOK aggressive strategic bid: 3 billion+ if several players see large synergies That sounds like a lot relative to how HAV has historically been priced on the stock exchange. But that's precisely why such "strategic reviews" often occur. When I roughly sum up the parts in my head: NES / Energy Design & Smart Control: maybe 1–1.5+ billion alone in an industrial sale HAV Design: maybe 200–400 million in the current cycle HAV Hydrogen: maybe low financial value now, but strategic option value ballast/water treatment: still value, service base, installed base expertise environment + customers + backlog + system integration: often underestimated on the stock exchange What makes HAV interesting is that they have actually built something resembling a complete green maritime technology platform: design electrical energy systems control/automation hydrogen integration maritime approvals/regulatory competence There are not many such environments in the Nordics. And if a large player wants to quickly buy into green maritime technology, it is often cheaper to acquire an existing environment than to build everything themselves over 5–10 years.
    8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    If one had asked AI the same regarding the Valuation of SEAM in November 25, one would probably have gotten many strange answers then too. The fact is that SEAM was sold for 2bn... NES has better Margins and is on track this year for quite similar revenue. So that the value of NES at least can be between 1.5-2bn is completely realistic.
    8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Sounds good, actually. It's way beyond today's mcap..
  • 8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Nice development despite low volume. Are we sniffing at 14,- before the weekend?
    8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Note that selling hardly occurs downwards. It is low volume, but buyer must meet seller in most transactions. That bodes well for the price development. One should also not rule out that some of the larger players suddenly place a block purchase, we have seen some instances of that recently. Such a purchase alone can lift the price a lot.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

NorwayEuronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
4 000--
3 500--
2 000--
14--
25 451--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
28.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
13.3.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
21.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
27.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
28.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
14.3.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
60 päivää sitten

Uutiset

AI
Viimeisin
Tämän sivun uutiset ja/tai sijoitussuositukset tai otteet niistä sekä niihin liittyvät linkit ovat mainitun tahon tuottamia ja toimittamia. Nordnet ei ole osallistunut materiaalin laatimiseen, eikä ole tarkistanut sen sisältöä tai tehnyt sisältöön muutoksia. Lue lisää sijoitussuosituksista.

Yhtiötapahtumat

Datan lähde: FactSet, Quartr
Seuraava tapahtuma
2026 Q1 -tulosraportti
28.5.
Menneet tapahtumat
2025 Q4 -tulosraportti
13.3.
2025 Q3 -tulosraportti
21.11.2025
2025 Q2 -tulosraportti
27.8.2025
2025 Q1 -tulosraportti
28.5.2025
2024 Q4 -tulosraportti
14.3.2025

Tuotteita joiden kohde-etuutena tämä arvopaperi

Foorumi

Liity keskusteluun Nordnet Socialissa
Kirjaudu
  • 1 t sitten
    ·
    1 t sitten
    ·
    Can anyone imagine a scenario where the result of the strategic review leads to the market pricing HAV lower?
    2 min sitten
    ·
    2 min sitten
    ·
    Not really
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    3 t sitten
    ·
    As if Hav wasn't already undervalued at sale, the future looks bright with regard to growth as well: https://e24.no/energi-og-klima/i/Pd5jdp/nye-klimakrav-til-offshoreskip?utm_source=iosapp&utm_medium=share
    2 t sitten
    ·
    2 t sitten
    ·
    Regulations and requirements will be a good driver for HAV's services and products, the EU is also pushing hard in the same direction.
  • 3 t sitten
    ·
    3 t sitten
    ·
    Tests 14 again, last was probably July 2022
    1 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    1 t sitten · Muokattu
    ·
    It looks like a floor is forming at 14,- now.
  • 8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Asked ChatGPT to make an assessment What do you think is a realistic price for HAV Group as a whole from a larger player? Purely strategically, I think HAV Group looks like a typical company where the stock market value can be significantly lower than what an industrial buyer would actually be willing to pay. If I were to realistically speculate on a whole company bid in today's market, I might think something like this: low/realistic floor: ~1.2–1.5 billion NOK more likely industrial scenario: ~1.8–2.5 billion NOK aggressive strategic bid: 3 billion+ if several players see large synergies That sounds like a lot relative to how HAV has historically been priced on the stock exchange. But that's precisely why such "strategic reviews" often occur. When I roughly sum up the parts in my head: NES / Energy Design & Smart Control: maybe 1–1.5+ billion alone in an industrial sale HAV Design: maybe 200–400 million in the current cycle HAV Hydrogen: maybe low financial value now, but strategic option value ballast/water treatment: still value, service base, installed base expertise environment + customers + backlog + system integration: often underestimated on the stock exchange What makes HAV interesting is that they have actually built something resembling a complete green maritime technology platform: design electrical energy systems control/automation hydrogen integration maritime approvals/regulatory competence There are not many such environments in the Nordics. And if a large player wants to quickly buy into green maritime technology, it is often cheaper to acquire an existing environment than to build everything themselves over 5–10 years.
    8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    If one had asked AI the same regarding the Valuation of SEAM in November 25, one would probably have gotten many strange answers then too. The fact is that SEAM was sold for 2bn... NES has better Margins and is on track this year for quite similar revenue. So that the value of NES at least can be between 1.5-2bn is completely realistic.
    8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Sounds good, actually. It's way beyond today's mcap..
  • 8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Nice development despite low volume. Are we sniffing at 14,- before the weekend?
    8.5.
    ·
    8.5.
    ·
    Note that selling hardly occurs downwards. It is low volume, but buyer must meet seller in most transactions. That bodes well for the price development. One should also not rule out that some of the larger players suddenly place a block purchase, we have seen some instances of that recently. Such a purchase alone can lift the price a lot.
Yllä olevat kommentit ovat peräisin Nordnetin sosiaalisen verkoston Nordnet Socialin käyttäjiltä, ​​eikä niitä ole muokattu eikä Nordnet ole tarkastanut niitä etukäteen. Ne eivät tarkoita, että Nordnet tarjoaisi sijoitusneuvoja tai sijoitussuosituksia. Nordnet ei ota vastuuta kommenteista.

Tarjoustasot

NorwayEuronext Growth Oslo
Määrä
Osto
-
Myynti
Määrä
-

Viimeisimmät kaupat

AikaHintaMääräOstajaMyyjä
4 000--
3 500--
2 000--
14--
25 451--

Huomioi, että vaikka osakkeisiin säästäminen on pitkällä aikavälillä tuottanut hyvin, tulevasta tuotosta ei ole takeita. On olemassa riski, että et saa sijoittamiasi varoja takaisin.

Välittäjätilasto

Dataa ei löytynyt